Sud-Kivu province covers 69,130 km² and population is estimated at 6,432,984 people. This province is located in eastern part of DRC between 1˚36' of latitude South and 5˚ of latitude South at one hand and 26˚47' of longitude East and 29˚20' and longitude East at the other hand [6] . Survey was implemented in Bukavu principal town and his hinterland of around 50 km, see Figure 1 in the territories of Kabare, Walungu and Kalehe.

Interview was carried out on 2^nd to 22^th April 2015 using standard methods of interviews and structured questionnaires at the household level. Site sampling was randomly done. Questionnaire was submitted to 18 sites; in Bukavu town and his hinterland for at all 180 stakeholders with 10 households per street and village.

Data were collected on the socio demographic characteristics, on production practices adopted by farmers, stock size and composition, management and housing systems adopted, feeding systems, diseases, weights and prices taken on chicken products. Then, households were interviewed in Bukavu town in 9 streets and in his hinterland 9 villages. The number of animals was converted

into Tropical Livestock Unit (TLU), where cattle are weighed with 0.7, sheep/goat 0.1, swine with 0.2 and chicken 0.01 [7] , duck was assigned 0.02 TLU, rabbit 0.01 TLU, cavy 0.005 TLU [8] . Materials used were GPS and an electronic scale “Electronic Kitchen scale SF-400” to weight eggs and chickens. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis such as frequency distribution, percentages and means comparison on IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 software.

Regarding on Table 1, gender issue represented male at 66.3% and female 36.7%. Gender balance is observed in six sites, eleven had at least 40% of females and one had 60% of females. The average age of the farmers was 39.3 ± 14.5 years, although there were significant (P < 0.05) differences in the average age of the farmers across the sites. Mushenyi site had the oldest farmers with an average of 49.3 ± 9.5 years when the youngest was in Kasali site with 23.6 ± 11.4 years. The education level indicted that majority of farmers did the secondary school 41.7% followed by primary school 31.7, illiterate 22.2% and university 4.4%. The chicken’s experience from grouping age demonstrated that 0 up to 5 years the average of years’ experience in chicken production was 2.6 ± 1.5 years,

*Significant at P<0.05, values in parentheses are percentages.

6 to 10 years 8.1 ± 1.7 years and above 10 years, 15.0 ± 13.5 years.

Various animals are reared in the study area, see Table 2. According to the TLU, the highest mean is recorded to swine 2.3 ± 2.0 TLU, followed by cattle 2.2 ± 2.9 TLU, sheep 0.32 ± 0.3 TLU, goat 0.31 ± 0.2 TLU and chicken 0.26 ± 1.7 TLU were both significant (P < 0.05) differences in TLU average across the sites, duck 0.12 ± 0.5 TLU, cavy 0.09 ± 1.5 TLU and Rabbit 0.04 TLU. Swine, goats and chickens were more reared in the region than the other animal species.

Table 2 shows the animal species.

*Significant at P < 0.05.

Regarding Table 3, the average of clutches per year was 2.8 ± 0.5. Duration of clutch was 18.8 ± 6.1 days, eggs number per clutch was 14.7 ± 4.2. For incubation, the average of eggs number incubated per hen was 8.8 ± 2.3, number of eggs hatched 7.9 ± 2.3. The weaning period was 88.2 ± 21.7 days where chick’s number at the weaning period was 5.2 ± 2.8. The rate of mortality was 34.1% ± 25.2%. Across the sites and when we consider the different parameters analyzed, there were high significant (P < 0.001) differences in the average. Ciyanja site had a low rate of mortality 5.6% ± 2.4% and Buholombo the highest with 68.7% ± 9.7%.

At Table 4, hen usually laid egg once each day (61.1%) and the mortality incidence per season was 68.5% in wet season.

Table 5 shows that the averages of chicken products weight were respectively 42.3 ± 5.1 g of egg, 442.4 ± 205.3 g of chicks at weaning pediod, 1265.5 ± 282.1 g of hen and 1571.4 ± 483.0 g of cock. The weight performances within the sites were performed for egg in Mushenyi 46.6 ± 5.2 g, chicks at weaning period in

*** Significant at P < 0.001.

Nkungu 700.0 ± 349.6 g, hen in Ciyanja 1771.0 ± 177.9 g and cock in Kamagema 2305.0 ± 670.8 g. There were high weights significant (P < 0.001) differences in average across the sites of egg, chicken at weaning period, hen and cock.

The common chicken accommodations at Table 6 were chickens in the human house 29.4% followed by adobes kitchen and free-range 23.9% and house adobe and enclosure 7.8%.

The feeding systems at Table 7 were dominated by the pure free-range 42.7%, followed by free-range with grains given to the chickens 36.7%, enclosure with concentrate 11.1%, confined poultry where chickens were entirely nourished on concentrate 5.0%.

Values in parentheses are percentages.

***Significant at P < 0.001.

*A = Buholohombo, B = Cikonyi, C = Cimpunda, D = Cirhagabwa, E = Ciriri, F = Ciyanja, G = Ibambiro, H = Ikambi, I = Kasali, J = Kazaroho, K = Luzira, L = Mashululwe, M = Mulamba, N = Mulengeza, O = Kamagema, P = Mushenyi, Q = Nkungu and R = Quartier C, Values in parentheses are percentages.

*A = Buholohombo, B = Cikonyi, C = Cimpunda, D = Cirhagabwa, E = Ciriri, F = Ciyanja, G = Ibambiro, H = Ikambi, I = Kasali, J = Kazaroho, K = Luzira, L = Mashululwe, M = Mulamba, N = Mulengeza, O = Kamagema, P = Mushenyi, Q = Nkungu and R = Quartier C, Values in parentheses are percentages.

With regard on Table 8, extension services didn’t work normally; 91.7% of farmers were not assisted by them. Interviewees who didn’t adhere to farmer’s association represented at 98.5%.

Regarding Table 9, the averages price were respectively of egg 0.20 ± 0.8 $, hen 6.5 ± 1.8 $ and cock 9.7 ± 1.9 $. There were high significant (P < 0.001) differences in the average of all chicken’s prices products across the sites. Then, prices are variously represented through the sites. Within the sites, hens from Ibambiro and Kasali were more profitable, it is the same to Buholohombo and Luzira for the cock and Ikambi the egg. Majority of chicken farmers had between

*A = Buholohombo, B = Cikonyi, C = Cimpunda, D = Cirhagabwa, E = Ciriri, F = Ciyanja, G = Ibambiro, H = Ikambi, I = Kasali, J = Kazaroho, K = Luzira, L = Mashululwe, M = Mulamba, N = Mulengeza, O = Kamagema, P = Mushenyi, Q = Nkungu and R = Quartier C, Values in parentheses are percentages.

***Significant at P < 0.001, values in parentheses are percentages.

up 101 to 200$ per month 39.9%. They are followed by those who had between 31 to 200$ per month 24.1%.

Farmers interviewed were yet young 39.3 years. Respondents’ mean age was 40.9 years in Sud-Kivu [9] . The gender issue on chicken farmers interviewed was dominated by 60.6% of males but in the same province, [10] observed that is was 54.3% of females who were interviewed on monogastric animal farmers. In Senegal poultry production is mainly managed by women and children [11] . Even if majority of chicken’s farmers did at least the secondary school, 22.2% of illiterates are yet enough among farmers. According to the animal species, four sites had a good diversification. In TLU classification, swine got the first place followed by cattle. Cattle are symbol for peasants’ social status and their possession reflects the wealth class that people belong to according to their self-perception [12] . Unhappily, cattle are not intended for regular consumption. The relationships of TLU with both education level and land size available point at multidimensional poverty restricting livestock husbandry [9] . This is why cattle are replacing slowly by other animal species such as swine in the region. The local chicken rate of mortality in Sud-Kivu is 34.1%. The characteristics of these local chickens in Sud-Kivu are almost similar to those observed in Africa where 40% of the chicks die within the first 8 - 12 weeks, hen lay in 3 - 4 clutches of 10 - 15 eggs each clutch a year and that is 30 to 60 eggs per year, hen weight 1170 to 1500 g as observed [13] [14] . To fight malnutrition and poverty, DRC government should promote chicken industry. As reproduction cycle of ruminants is long, a particular attention should be paid to promote the monogastrics animals. Non ruminants are prolific, robust animals have excellent meat quality; they can play an important role in fighting food insecurity [9] . We need a good program of local chickens characterization coupled with genetic molecular analysis in the entire Sud-Kivu province and why not in all the country before the selection begins.

Majority of chickens traders had a revenue up 101 to 200 $ that is almost similar to Ethiopian where poultry farmer was between 91 to 150 $ per month [15] . Chicken products prices are high in Bukavu town and his hinterland when in Tanzania, coq is cost 7 $ and hen 4.3 $ [13] . A poultry trader makes a monthly profit of 200 Birr (22 USD) [15] . The traditional system must be improved. It is possible in DRC to make benefit of 7 $ monthly the first year and 107.3 $ per month the second year on local chickens with at beginning of ten hens and one cock [16] . But also semi-intensive and intensive systems with improved chickens should be promoted to produce more food and income.