<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCT</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cancer Therapy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2151-1934</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jct.2020.112008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCT-98609</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation the Possibility of Using of miRNA-21 as a Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Colorectal Cancer (South Egypt Experience)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ashraf</surname><given-names>Zedain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hosny</surname><given-names>Badrawy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mayada</surname><given-names>Fawzy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dina</surname><given-names>Ismail Abd El Razik</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sanaa</surname><given-names>Saber</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abeer</surname><given-names>Ibrahim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Medical Oncology &amp;amp; Hematological malignancy, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Clinical Pathology, South Egypt Cancer Institute, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>01</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>88</fpage><lpage>97</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: 
  Micro RNA 21
   
  (miRNA
  -
  21) is overexpressed in numerous solid types of tumor
  s
  , indicating that its biology is relevant to numerous types of cancer. However,
   
  in Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
   
  there is a lot of studie
  s
   confirmed its use as diagnostic marker, other studies suggested it could be used as a predictive marker for 5 Fu sensitivity so this study was conducted to verified the significance of using miRNA-21 as a prognostic and predictive factor in CRC. 
  <b>Patients and Methods: </b>
  It is a prospective study 
  that 
  included 45 patients with stage I-IV CRC who attended at South Egypt Cancer Institute from April 2017 to October 2018.
   
  miRNA-21 was measured by (q PCR) from peri
  pheral blood.
   
  Response to 5-FU containing regimens was assessed using RECIST
   criteria and its levels of expression were correlated to the clincopathological data,
   
  response and survival of the patients.
   
  <b>Results:</b>
   
  High expression of the miRNA21 was significantly associated with advanced stage of CRC p &lt;
   
  0.001,
   
  Lymph Node (LN)
   
  invasion p &lt;
   
  0.001,distant metastasis p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.01 lymphovascular (LVI) invasion p &lt;
   
  0.01 and pre
  -
  treatment level of Carcino
   
  Embryonic Antigen (CEA) p &lt;
   
  0.031. Also we found that high expression level significantly badly affected the response to 5-Fu containing regimen p &lt;
   
  0.001, DFS p &lt; 0.01 and OS p &lt;
   
  0.01.
   
  <b>Conclusion:</b>
   miRNA-21 could be used as non
  -
  invasive prognostic and predictive marker in CRC.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CRC</kwd><kwd> miRNA-21</kwd><kwd> Prognostic</kwd><kwd> Predictive</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Colorectal cancer remains the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in both men and women and represents one of the most frequent causes of cancer death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref1">1</xref>] due to its diversity in the clinical course. And approximately 50% of patients with colorectal cancer die from distant metastases, and in particular liver metastases, within 10 years of the initial diagnosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Clinicians up to now still require recognizing prognostic markers with minimal invasion and with high sensitivity, to improve the survival rate of CRC patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>The advances of molecular biology have added to a better understanding of cancer development, predicting its evolution, therapeutic response and even developing molecular target [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref5">5</xref>]. Recent studies have proved that microRNA (miRNA) play important roles in tumor invasion and metastasis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref7">7</xref>]. miRNA are small, non-coding RNA that block specific target genes in mammalian cells by suppressing translation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref8">8</xref>]. Depending on the target gene, miRNA can act as either oncogenes or tumor suppressive genes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref9">9</xref>]. Several studies results proved that the aberrant expression of specific miRNA can be used as potent prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref11">11</xref>]. Because current prognostic markers of many cancers, including colorectal cancer, poorly predict metastatic progression or tumor response to chemotherapy, the identification of such prognostic markers is the subject of intense research.</p><p>Several miRNAs isolated from serum have been evaluated for their use as prognostic markers in CRC. A recent report revealed a panel of miRNAs (miR-21, let-7g, miR-31, miR-92a, miR-181b, and miR-203) that can be reliably used as prognostic marker for CRC, with 93% sensitivity and 91% specificity in comparison with the traditional markers (CEA and CA19-9) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref12">12</xref>]. Furthermore, miR-21 has also been shown to be able to differentiate both adenoma and CRC from healthy controls [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref14">14</xref>]. Also recent studies suggested that low miRNA-21 could sensitize CRC cells to 5-fu treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>However these results are still under investigations and researches, the results are not mature enough to reach agreement or consensus about which miRNA would be used as prognostic or predictive marker.</p><p>As miRNAs are still under investigation in colorectal cancer, so we choose mi RNA21 to focus on it in our study as the previous studies’ results about it were encouraging.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This is a prospective study was done on 45 CRC newly diagnosed who presented to South Egypt Cancer Institute in the period between May 2017 and October 2018 with median follow up period of 18 months. All patients included in this study will subject to: Full history taking and complete clinical examination, all patients staged according to the 8<sup>th</sup> edition, 2017 revision of the TNM staging classification. All patients had complete laboratory investigation and CEA at diagnosis. Biopsy was taken whether by endoscopy or surgery and sent to the pathology laboratory as a routine and examined by expert pathologist.</p><p>Received 5FU based chemotherapy regimen either CAPOX, FOLFOX or FOLIRI according to their stage + the target therapy in the pantumomab in patients with metastatic colorectal with K ras wild type. Patients followed up by computed tomography scan (CT) on the chest and pelvi-abdomen every 3 months during the treatment and every 6 months during the follow up. The response interpreted according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) criteria. All patients have signed a written consent containing the detailed description of the study. The research program was approved by the ethical committee, South Egypt Cancer Institute, SCI-IRBIORG0006563N0 = 354.</p><p>Before the start of the treatment we collected 2 ml of peripheral blood sample via direct venous puncture with complete aseptic precautions and measured miRNA-21 by q real time PCR.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Methods of miRNA-21 Measurement</title><p>miRNA was isolated from peripheral venous blood samples by using the miRN easy Mini kit from Qiagen, Hilden, Germany.</p><p>Isolated miRNA is converted to its complementary DNA (CDNA) by using TaqMan miRNA Reverse Transcription kit from Qiagen, Hilden, Germany.</p><p>Then relative quantification of miRNA expression is measured by performing Q-PCR amplification using Taqman Universal PCR Master MixII (2x) and Taqman small RNA Assay (20x) by 7500 fast real time PCR system, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Analysis</title><p>To calculate relative expression in RT-qPCR qPCR Ct values for:</p><p>1) The gene being tested: in control and experimental samples;</p><p>2) The housekeeping gene: in control and experimental samples.</p><p>&#183; Take the average of the Cycle threshold (Ct) values for the housekeeping gene and the gene being tested in the experimental and control samples, returning 4 values. The 4 values are Gene being Tested Experimental (TE), Gene being Tested Control (TC), Housekeeping Gene Experimental (HE), and Housekeeping Gene Control (HC).</p><p>&#183; Calculate ΔCt values for the experimental (ΔCTE) and control (ΔCTC) conditions. ΔCTE is the differences between TE and HE (TE-HE) and ΔCTC is the difference between TC and HC (TC-HC).</p><p>&#183; Then, calculate ΔΔCt which is the difference between ΔCTE and ΔCTC (ΔCTE-ΔCTC) to arrive at the Double Delta Ct Value (ΔΔCt).</p><p>&#183; Calculate fold change: Relative quantification (RQ) which is the value of 2^-ΔΔCt to get the expression status. If RQ is more than 1 means expression of target is more than the control included in my experiment (up expressed) and if RQ is less than 1 means expression of target is less than the control (down expressed).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data was represented as numbers, percentages, means or median. All analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 21. Univariant factors were analyzed using the chi-square test for categorical variables, Cox’s proportional hazard regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of death according to serum and tumor miRNA levels, unadjusted and adjusted for potential confounding factors for death, Assumptions of proportionality were confirmed for the Cox proportional hazards analyses by generating Kaplan-Meier survival curves (e.g., high- vs. low-expression groups) and by ensuring that the two curves did not intersect each other. All p values are two-sided; p less than or equal to 0.05 also we calculated the odd ratio (OR) between low and high expression groups.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. The Clinico-Pathological Features of the Studied Patients</title><p>We enrolled 45 patients with CRC newly diagnosed who presented to SECI out patients clinic from May 2017 to September 2018. Tumor characteristics of the study patients are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. 16 patients (36%) had high risk pathology</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Clinico-pathological character of the patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (years), Mean &#177; standard deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177; 15.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(51)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Site of tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >( 51)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rectum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low risk pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(64)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High risk pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(36)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade of tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(16)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(36)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Lymphovascular invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(33)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(42)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not assessed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(24)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tissue invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >limited invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(15)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marked invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(84)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Lymph node invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(29)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(71)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Distant metastasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(51)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(27)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advanced stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(34)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >CEA at presentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5 ng/m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(44)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥5 ng/m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(56)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Data was expressed in form of mean (SD) and frequency (percentage).</p><p>(mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet ring carcinoma, mucoid adenocarcinoma with signet ring differentiation and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) and 29 patients (64%) patients had low risk pathology (well differentiated adenocarcinoma and moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma) with 7 patients (16%) had grade 1 (G1) tumor, 22 patients (49%) had G2 tumor and 16 patients (35%) had G3 tumor. 15 patients (33%) had negative lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 19 patients (42%) had positive LVI. 11 patients LVI not assessed.</p><p>Regarding the TNM staging, only 7 patients (16%) had limited invasion (T1, T2) and 38 (84%) patients had marked invasion (T3, T4). 13 (29%) patients had N0 and 32 (71%) had N+ (N1, N2, Nx). 22 (49%) patients presented with stage I-III, while 23 (51%) presented with metastatic disease (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). 25 (56%) patients presented with high CEA level (≥5 ng/ml) while 20 (44%) patients with normal level (&lt;5 ng/ml) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Expression of miRNA-21 and Its Correlation with Control and Clinico-Pathological Features</title><p>Nineteen patients (42%) had down expressed miRNA-21 level and 26 patients (57.78%) had up expressed level with (cut off value = 1). We didn’t find any significant association between the high expression of miRNA21 and age, sex, site of tumors, pathology type and tumors grads (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). However, our results</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Corerelatioon between miRNA-21 expression and clicopathological data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >MiRNA21</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Down expressed N = 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Up expressed N = 26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low risk pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(59</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.878</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High risk pathology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(56)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Differentiation of tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well differentiated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.609</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate differentiated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(64)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poorly differentiated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(56)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Lymphovascular invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(73)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(68)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not assessed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(82)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(57)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.433</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marked invasion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(61)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(25 )</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(75)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(59)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metastatic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(74)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advanced stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(73)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T = tumor invasion, N = lymph node invasion, M = distant metastasis.</p><p>found significant association between high expression of miRNA21 and LVI p &lt; 0.01 and the LN invasions p value = 0.002 OR 16.5 (95% CI: 2.99 - 90.86). So patients with down expressed miRNA-21 were about 16 times more likely to have no lymph node invasion at time of diagnosis than those with up expressed miRNA21 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Also we found statistical significant correlation with miRNA-21 and distant metastasis p value = 0.01, OR 0.244 (95% CI: 0.069 - 0.862).</p><p>Patients with down expressed miRNA-21 are about four times less likely to being metastatic than those with up expressed miRNA-21 with (95% CI: 1.16 - 14.49) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The miRNA-21 was statistically significant stage p value = 0.001, OR 13.33 (95% CI: 2.44 - 73.02) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). There was also significant corelation between CEA and miRNA21 with p value = 0.01, OR 3.86 (95% CI: 1.11 - 13.46). Patients with down expressed miRNA21 were about three times more likely to have CEA at presentation &lt;5 ng/ml than those with up expression with (95% CI: 1.11 - 13.46).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. The Correlation of the miRNA-21 with the Response to 5-Fu Based Chemotherapy</title><p>The response to 5-fu based regimen in metastatic patients showed statistically significant association with the low expression of miRNA21 levels p value = 0.001.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. The Correlation of the miRNA-21 with the Survival</title><p>Our results showed statistical significant difference in patients with low expression of miRNA-21 in patients with early disease (non metastatic) in their median DFS than those who presented with high expression p value = 0.024 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Hazard of relapse with up expressed miRNA-21 = 2.26 (95% CI: 1.05 - 4.85). On the other hand, we didn’t find significant difference between patients with low and high expression of miRNA-21 in advanced patients with metastases in their median PFS p value = 0.05 Regarding the OS results showed significant difference between patients with low and high expression of miRNA 23 months (95% CI: 21.1 - 25.53) vs. 20 months (95% CI: 16.28 - 22.91), Hazard of death with up expressed miRNA21 = 4.22 (95% CI = 0.901 - 19.65), p value = 0.04 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>miRNA-21 is one of the most extensively investigated oncogenic miRNAs whose expression is frequently up-regulated in CRC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref16">16</xref>]. It can down regulate several tumor suppressor genes, including PTEN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref17">17</xref>].which acts as a lipid phosphatase to dephosphorylate phosphatidylinositol 3 trisphosphate (PIP3), antagonizing the PI3K/Akt pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref6">6</xref>]. This pathway has an important effect on numerous biological functions, such as cell proliferation, adhesion, angiogenesis, migration, invasion, metabolism and anti-apoptosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref18">18</xref>]. This suggests the oncogenic role of miRNA-21 in CRC.</p><p>We conducted this study to investigate the miRNA21 as a prognostic and predictive factor in our cases of CRC.</p><p>There was no significant relationships in our study between the miRNA21 and the age, sex and site of tumor this was matched with previous studies by Zhang et al. and Bastaminejad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>Also we didn’t find significant association between miRNA21 expression and pathological type and grade of differentiation this similar to the results of Mima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref21">21</xref>]. Our results might disagree with Wu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref22">22</xref>] who showed that miRNA-21 expression was significantly higher in patients with poor differentiation but this asymmetry probably explained by small sample size in our study.</p><p>There was no significant relationship in our study with the depth of invasion this was similar to results of Schee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref23">23</xref>] while Oue et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref16">16</xref>] demonstrated that miRNA-21 expression was significantly increased in patients with T4, versus patients with T1–T3. These discrepancies might be explained by different sample size and may be different cut off values.</p><p>Patients with down expressed miRNA21 in our study are about four times less likely to being metastatic than those with high expression level. This was similar to results of multiple studies example of which Toiyama et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref13">13</xref>] and Drusco et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref24">24</xref>].</p><p>We found strong association between high expression of mi RNA and advanced stage and that was in line with previous results like Liu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref25">25</xref>] and Bastaminejad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref20">20</xref>] also significant association was found between the levels of expression of miRNA21 and LVI and this was explained by Fukushima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref26">26</xref>] who reported that miRNA inhibit programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) which cause more invasion and intravasation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>Despite our results contradict previous meta-analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref27">27</xref>] who reported no association between expression of mi RNA 21 and CEA levels. However, our results were in line with Wu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref22">22</xref>], as our data showed that patients with down expressed miRNA21 are about three times more likely to have CEA at presentation &lt;5 ng/ml than those with up expressed miRNA21, OR 3.86 (95% CI= 1.11 - 13.46).</p><p>Regarding the response to 5FU based chemotherapy and survival, patients with high expressed level of miRNA21 were statistically significant insensitive to 5 FU chemotherapy this was similar to results of Caram&#233;s et al. and Takaaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>Moreover, we found strong significant association with DFS and OS which agree with previous researches like Tsukamotoet al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref30">30</xref>], Xia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref27">27</xref>] and Gao et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref31">31</xref>]. But our results failed to find association with PFS however similar results were published before by Jie et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98609-ref5">5</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>miRNA-21 high expression is associated with bad risk factors and poor DFS and OS in CRC, also its high expression associated with decreased sensitivity to 5Fu based regimens. So miRNA-21 could be considered as an ideal non-invasive prognostic and predictive marker in CRC.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zedain, A., Badrawy, H., Fawzy, M., El Razik, D.I.A., Saber, S. and Ibrahim, A. (2020) Evaluation the Possibility of Using of miRNA-21 as a Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Colorectal Cancer (South Egypt Experience). Journal of Cancer Therapy, 11, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2020.112008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.98609-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, T., Guo, F., Yu, Y., et al. (2017) Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Chemoresistance to Colorectal Cancer by Modulating Autophagy. Cell, 170, 548-563.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holzel, D., Eckel, R. and Engel, J. (2009) Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Frequency, Prognosis, and Consequences. Der Chirurg, 80, 331-340.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-008-1603-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Q., Gumireddy, K., Schrier, M., et al. (2008) The microRNAs miR-373 and miR-520c Promote Tumour Invasion and Metastasis. Nature Cell Biology, 10, 202-210.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1681</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, L. and Weinberg, R.A. (2008) Micromanagers of Malignancy: Role of microRNAs in Regulating Metastasis. Trends in Genetics, 24, 448-456.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2008.06.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jie, Y., Dongling, M., Andrew, F., et al. (2017) Expression Analysis of microRNA as Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Oncotarget, 8, 52403-52412.  
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi, R., Li, Y., Wang, F.L., et al. (2016) MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 8, 330-340. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i4.330</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wellner, U., Schubert, J., Burk, U.C., et al. (2009) The EMT-Activator ZEB1 Promotes Tumorigenicity by Repressing Stemness-Inhibiting microRNAs. Nature Cell Biology, 11, 1487-1495. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bartel, D.P. (2004) MicroRNAs: Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function. Cell, 116, 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, W., Dahlberg, J.E. and Tam, W. (2007) MicroRNAs in Tumorigenesis: A Primer. The American Journal of Pathology, 171, 728-738.  
https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2007.070070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schepeler, T., Reinert, J.T., Ostenfeld, M.S., et al. (2008) Diagnostic and Prognostic microRNAs in Stage II Colon Cancer. Cancer Research, 68, 6416-6424.  
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schetter, A.J., Leung, S.Y., Sohn, J.J., et al. (2008) MicroRNA Expression Profiles Associated with Prognosis and Therapeutic Outcome in Colon Adenocarcinoma. JAMA, 299, 425-436. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.4.425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Huang, S.K., Zhao, M., Yang, M., Zhong, J.L., Gu, Y.Y., Peng, H., Che, Y.Q. and Huang, C.Z. (2014) Identification of a Circulating microRNA Signature for Colorectal Cancer Detection. PLoS ONE, 9, e87451.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toiyama, Y., Takahashi, M., Hur, K., Nagasaka, T., Tanaka, K., Inoue, Y., Kusunoki, M., Boland, C.R. and Goel, A. (2013) Serum miR-21 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 849-859. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hollis, M., Nair, K., Vyas, A., Chaturvedi, L.S., Gambhir, S. and Vyas, D. (2015) MicroRNAs Potential Utility in Colon Cancer: Early Detection, Prognosis, and Chemosensitivity. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 21, 8284-8292.  
https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, H.-M., Wang, C., Yuan, Z., et al. (2019) LncRNA NEAT1 Promotes the Tumorigenesis of Colorectal Cancer by Sponging miR-193a-3p. Cell Proliferation, 52, e12526.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oue, N., Anami, K., Schetter, A.J., et al. (2014) High miR-21 Expression from FFPE Tissues Is Associated with Poor Survival and Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer. International Journal of Cancer, 134, 1926-1934.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28522</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leslie, N.R. and Downes, C.P. (2002) PTEN: The Down Side of PI 3-Kinase Signalling. Cellular Signalling, 14, 285-295.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-6568(01)00234-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bader, A.G., Kang, S., Zhao, L., et al. (2005) Oncogenic PI3K Deregulates Transcription and Translation. Nature Reviews Cancer, 5, 921-929.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1753</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, W., Zhang, T., Jin, R., et al. (2014) MicroRNA-301a Promotes Migration and Invasion by Targeting TGFBR2 in Human Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Experimental &amp; Clinical Cancer Research, 33, Article No. 113.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-014-0113-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bastaminejad, S., Taherikalani, M., Ghanbari, R., et al. (2016) Investigation of microrna-21 Expression Levels in Serum and Stool as a Potential Non-Invasive Biomarker for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Iranian Biomedical Journal, 21, 106-113.  
https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.2.106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mima, K., Sukawa, Y., Nishihara, R., et al. (2016) Fusobacterium nucleatum and T-Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma. JAMA Oncology, 1, 653-661.  
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Y., Song, Y., Xiong, Y., et al. (2017) MicroRNA-21 (Mir-21) Promotes Cell Growth and Invasion by Repressing Tumor Suppressor PTEN in Colorectal Cancer. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, 43, 945-958.  
https://doi.org/10.1159/000481648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schee, K., Boye, K., Abrahamsen, T., et al. (2012) Clinical Relevance of microRNA miR-21, miR-31, miR-92a, miR-101, miR-106a and miR-145 in Colorectal Cancer. BMC Cancer, 12, Article No. 505. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drusco, A., Nuovo, G.J., Zanesi, N., et al. (2014) MicroRNA Profiles Discriminate among Colon Cancer Metastasis. PLoS ONE, 9, e96670.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, G.H., Zhou, Z.G., Chen, R., et al. (2013) Serum miR-21 and miR-92a as Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. Tumor Biology, 34, 2175-2181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0753-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fukushima, Y., Iinuma, H., Tsukamoto, M., et al. (2015) Clinical Significance of microRNA-21 as a Biomarker in Each Dukes’ Stage of Colorectal Cancer. Oncology Reports, 33, 573-582. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3614</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xia, X., Yang, B., Zhai, X., et al. (2013) Prognostic Role of microRNA-21 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 8, e80426.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caramés, C., Cristóbal, I., Moreno, V., et al. (2015) MicroRNA-21 Predicts Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 30, 899-906.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2231-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takaaki, M., Naoki, H., Yosuke, K., et al. (2017) MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers, 9, 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers9090124</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsukamoto, M., Iinuma, H., Yagi, T., et al. (2017) Circulating Exosomal MicroRNA-21 as a Biomarker in Each Tumor Stage of Colorectal Cancer. Oncology, 92, 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1159/000463387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98609-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, S., Zhao, Z.-Y., Wu, R., et al. (2018) Prognostic Value of microRNAs in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cancer Management and Research, 10, 907-929.  
https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S157493</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>