<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2020.112021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-98585</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of Weed Incidence and Biomass in Coffee Intercropped with Oil Palm in Avenue and Hollow Square Arrangement in Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>O. Famaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>A. Adeosun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>O. Ayegboyin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>B. Adejobi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>O.</surname><given-names>S. O. Akanbi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>F. Okunade</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN), Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>01</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>276</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2020</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Weed incidence and biomass in tree crop plantations are mainly influenced by environmental, farm management practices and cropping systems. Manipulation of intercropping systems to improve weed management in coffee intercropped with oil palm requires a better understanding of 
  spatial
   and temporal dynamics of weeds. To evaluate the effect of weed incidence and biomass in coffee intercropped with oil palm in avenue and hollow square arrangement, a study was carried out in 
  Cocoa
   Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN) in two locations. The locations are Idi-Ayunre (7
  &amp;deg;
  25
  '
  N, 3
  &amp;deg;
  24
  '
  E) (an alfisol) and Uhonmora (6
  &amp;deg;
  5
  '
  N, 5
  &amp;deg;
  50
  '
  E) (ultisol) in rainforest and derived savannah parts of Nigeria respectively. The experiment had three treatments comprising coffee sole (control), coffee with oil palm (Hollow square) arrangement and coffee with oil palm (Avenue) planting. Coffee was planted 3.0
   
  m apart while oil palm was planted 9
   
  m apart. Equal size of land area was used for coffee in each treatment. The experimental design was Randomized Complete Block (RCBD) with three replicates. Data on vegetative growth of coffee, weed incidence and biomass were taken at three-monthly intervals. The result showed that coffee/oil palm (Hollow Square) had the least weed incidence and biomass closely followed by coffee/oil palm (Avenue) planting. The control had the highest weed biomass which was significantly different from Hollow square and Avenue planting at P
   
  ≤
   
  0.05. The morphological parameters on coffee followed the same pattern but Hollow square arrangement was significantly higher than Avenue and control at P
   
  ≤
   
  0.05.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Evaluation</kwd><kwd> Weed</kwd><kwd> Incidence</kwd><kwd> Biomass</kwd><kwd> Coffee</kwd><kwd> Intercropped</kwd><kwd> Oil Palm</kwd><kwd> Hollow Square</kwd><kwd> Avenue Arrangement</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Weed flora has changed over the past century, with either increasing or decreasing species abundance depending on the management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref3">3</xref>]. In an integrated approach, the development of cropping systems such as appropriate spatial arrangements and the efficient intercropping systems will help crops themselves to compete with weeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref4">4</xref>]. Manipulation of cropping systems for the purpose of improving integrated weed management requires a good understanding of weed dynamics and influences of crop and soil-related factors on weed life cycles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>Weeds have been implicated as the most damaging of crop pests because weed communities continue to adapt in response to new management measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref6">6</xref>]. Weed presence may cause more problems in some cropping systems, especially in organic farming where application of systemic agrochemicals is not allowed. Belde et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref7">7</xref>] found that the composition of weed seed in the soil seed bank hardly changed six years after converting a farm from conventional to organic systems. However, many other investigators showed positive effect of cropping systems on biodiversity of farm lands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref10">10</xref>]. Weed seed banks may reflect the status of weed population in the present and the past and could be regarded as an indicator of the impact of crop management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref11">11</xref>]. Furthermore, weed causes reduction in crop yield and extra cost in the total labour use in crop production. Akobundu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref12">12</xref>] stated that weed causes 65% reduction in yield of root and tuber crops and takes 25% of total labour use in production. Weed control constitutes the greatest problem during the early year of field establishment of coffee plant when they have not formed sizeable canopy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref13">13</xref>]. Weed still appears to be the most deleterious constraint causing berry yield reduction. It is one of the commonest agronomic problems in coffee after planting on the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>Hoe weeding which is the traditional method of weed control in Nigeria is very expensive, labour intensive, time consuming and exposes coffee soil to erosion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref15">15</xref>]. Herbicides are very expensive for peasant farmers who are the major coffee growers in Nigeria. The current high cost of labour and unavailability of herbicide have necessitated the need for the cropping system manipulation to reduce weed incidence in coffee and equally improve its vigour and survival rate at early year of field establishment before the canopy closes.</p><p>Weed control through farming system practice of planting food crops has been found to suppress weed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref18">18</xref>]. Intercropping had been reported to increase crop diversity, biological stability of the ecosystem and labour efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref19">19</xref>]. Intercropping in coffee to provide food and income for the farmers is usually possible at the juvenile stage before the leaf canopy closes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref20">20</xref>]. With the global food crisis, intercropping coffee with tree crops of economic value that can still be together for years beyond the juvenile stage is of vital importance. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and biomass of weed in coffee intercropped with oil palm in Avenue planting and Hollow square arrangement.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study was carried out in Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria (CRIN) in two locations between year 2012 and 2013 covering two rainy seasons and two dry seasons. The rainy season which runs from April to October is characterized by heavy rains, low ambient temperature and high humidity; while dry season running from November to March is characterized by little or no rain, high ambient temperature and very low humidity. The locations are Idi-Ayunre (7˚25'N, 3˚24'E) (an alfisol) and Uhonmora (6˚5'N, 5˚50'E) (an ultisol) in rainforest and derived savanna zones of Nigeria respectively.</p><p>The coffee (Coffee canephora) seeds were obtained from CRIN research plot and raised into seedlings in CRIN central nursery. Oil palm seedlings (Tenera variety) were obtained from National Institute for Oil Palm Research (NIFOR), Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. Plantain suckers were obtained from CRIN as shade for coffee seedlings at establishment.</p><p>The experiment had three treatments comprising of coffee sole (control), coffee/oil palm (Avenue) planting and coffee/oil palm (Hollow square) arrangement. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications. In Avenue planting, one line in three of palms omitted and the space planted with coffee. Hollow square treatment was created by omitting one palm out of each square of nine palms planted with coffee; while control was pure stands of coffee and pure stand of oil palm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Coffee was planted 3 m &#215; 3 m plant spacing, while oil palm was planted 9 m &#215; 9 m. The plantain was planted at 3 m &#215; 3 m as shade crop at different geometry of coffee.</p><p>Weeding was carried regularly at 3 months interval during the experiment. Quadrants of 30 cm &#215; 30 cm were used to take weed samples per treatment before each time of weeding.</p><p>Data collected on physical and chemical properties of the soil at the beginning of the experiment through soil sampling and laboratory assay. Weed species were identified and collected by throwing a 30 &#215; 30 cm quadrant three times per plot. Fresh and dry weight of the weed after oven drying for 72 hours to a constant weight at 85˚C was determined. The results obtained were subjected to statistical analysis and LSD was used to separate the means that were significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The result of the initial physical and chemical properties of the soils used for the experiments is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The particle-size analysis of the soils of both Idi-Ayunre and Uhonmora experimental sites showed that the soils were sandy loam, Alfisols and Utisols respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref21">21</xref>]. The silt and clay contents of the soils at both locations (18.40% and 21.20%) were below the 32% estimated to be adequate for soils considered to be ideal for tree crops production especially coffee [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref22">22</xref>]. Based on the established critical levels for soils in South-Western Nigeria, the soils at Idi-Ayunre and Uhonmora were acidic with pH ranging between 6.2 - 5.2. The total nitrogen of both Idi-Ayunre and Uhonmora soils (0.07% and 0.09%) was less than 0.15% which is considered optimal for most crops including coffee. The soils also had low CEC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref23">23</xref>]. The available P (7.40 and 7.15 mg/kg for Idi-ayunre and Uhonmora respectively) is considered inadequate for coffee and oil-Palm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref22">22</xref>]. Only Uhonmora soil gave exchangeable potassium below the critical value of 0.3 cmol/kg required for coffee. The exchangeable Ca<sup>2+</sup> of both locations fell below the critical value of 5 cmol/kg required for coffee growth. Again, at both locations, the exchangeable Mg<sup>2+</sup> was inadequate for coffee production. Obatolu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref24">24</xref>] earlier observed the general low Mg<sup>2+</sup> nutrient content of coffee soils in southern part of Nigeria. The low nutrient contents of the soils implied the need for external input of nutrients in order to meet the requirements for optimal coffee growth. It is obvious that the soils of both Idi-Ayunre and Uhonmora were inherently low in fertility and were therefore expected to show positive response to soil amendment.</p><p>Predominant weed species observed in the plots are indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The weeds were more of annual broad leaf weeds than grasses and sedges. Weed incidence was more prevalent in Idi-Ayunre than in Uhonmora. This might probably be as a result of the fact that Idi-Ayuunre was in Rain Forest zone with</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Physical and chemical soil properties of the experimental sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soil Properties</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Idi-Ayunre</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Uhonmora</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH (H<sub>2</sub>O)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Organic carbon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Total Nitrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available P (mg/kg) Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchangeable K (cmol/kg) Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchangeable Ca (cmol/kg) Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchangeable Mg (cmol/kg) Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchangeable Na (cmol/kg) Soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Silt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soil Classification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alfisol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ultisol</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Common weed species present at the experimental sites and their level of occurrence</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Weed species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Level of infestation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Idi-Ayunre</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Uhonmora</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Broad leaf weeds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Euphorbia hirta L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Euphorbia Heterophylla L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Talinum triangulare (Jacq) Wild</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tridax procumbens L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ancanthospermum hispidum DC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspillia Africana (Pers) CD Adams</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and Robinson</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amaranthus viridis L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Solanum nigrum L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grasses</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cynodon dactylon (L.) Prs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleusine indica Gaertn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panicum maximum Jacq</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chloris pilasa (Scham)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sedges</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyperus rotundus L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyperus esculentum L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyperus deformis L.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>+++ = High occurrence (60% - 90%); ++ = Moderate occurrence (40% - 59%); + = Minor occurrence (1% - 39%); - = Nil (absent).</p><p>more rains, while Uhonmora was in Derived Savanna. Also, there was less weed infestation in the second year compared to the first year in both locations. The higher vegetative growth of coffee and oil palm in the second year might be responsible for this. This shows that weed infestation might have constituted a major set-back to coffee production in early stage of field establishment, especially before the canopy closed. This is in consonance with CRIN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref13">13</xref>] which found out that weed constituted the greatest problem of coffee production during the early year of field establishment before they formed sizeable canopy. It was also reported that weed was the commonest agronomic problem in coffee on the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the weed biomass at both locations. The highest weed biomass was recorded in the control treatment followed by Avenue with the least in Hollow square arrangement. This suggests the exposure of the ground surface of control treatment to more insolation. The significant less weed biomass in the hollow square arrangement plots suggests lesser weed incidence and lower labour</p><p>requirement for weeding compared to the control plots. This also implies that coffee/oil palm in Hollow square arrangement is a better cropping system than other treatments. This agrees with the earlier work of Adeyemi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref25">25</xref>] that reported appropriate intercropping system of food crop combinations that would increase labour efficiency in coffee production. It also corroborates Famaye [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref16">16</xref>] who reported that coffee/plantain farming system suppressed weed growth. Similarly, Santos et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref20">20</xref>] had reported a reduced weed infestation in coffee intercrop with herbaceous legumes. This underscores the significance of intercropping system in the control of weed in coffee farms.</p><p>The plant height and leaf area of coffee are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> respectively. Coffee in Hollow square was higher in plant height as well as leaf area than other treatments, although the difference was not significant (P &lt; 0.05). The least incidence of weed under coffee Hollow square and the consequent less competition from weeds for plant nutrients might have made nutrients more available for the coffee under this treatment, thus leading to better growth. The least growth was recorded in the control. The higher plant height and leaf area of</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean plant height (cm) of coffee intercropped with oil palm in hollow square and avenue arrangements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Months after transplanting</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Idi-Ayunre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee sole (Control)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avenue arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hollow square arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (P &lt; 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Uhonmora</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee sole (Control)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avenue arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hollow square arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (P &lt; 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mean leaf area (cm<sup>2</sup>) of coffee intercropped with oil palm in avenue and hollow square arrangements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Months after transplanting</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Idi-Ayunre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee sole (Control)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avenue arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hollow square arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (P &lt; 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Uhonmora</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee sole (Control)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avenue arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hollow square arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (P &lt; 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>coffee in Hollow square arrangement than in the control confirms the finding of Obatolu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.98585-ref14">14</xref>] on the possibility of intercropping coffee with other crops.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion and Recommendations</title><p>The Hollow square arrangement of growing coffee with oil palm was found superior to Avenue arrangement and coffee sole cropping as it enhanced the growth of coffee as well as reduced weed infestation in coffee plantation. This Hollow square arrangement appears to be more profitable and could be recommended to Robusta coffee farmers in Nigeria.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Famaye, A.O., Adeosun, S.A., Ayegboyin, K.O., Adejobi, K.B., Akanbi, O.S.O. and Okunade, A.F. (2020) Evaluation of Weed Incidence and Biomass in Coffee Intercropped with Oil Palm in Avenue and Hollow Square Arrangement in Nigeria. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11, 276-284. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.112021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.98585-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bagmet</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Dynamic of the Segetal Element of Weed Flora in the Lower-Volga Region</article-title><source> Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 85</fpage>-<lpage>90</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marshall, E.J.P., Brown, V.K., Boatman, N.D., Lutman, P.J.W., Squire, G.R. and Ward, L.K. (2003) The Role of Weeds in Supporting Biological Diversity within Crop Fields. Weed Science, 43, 77-89.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00326.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoate, C., Boatman, D., Borralho, R.J., Carvalho, C.R., Desnoo, G.R. and Eden, P. (2002) Ecological Impacts of Arable Intensification in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 337-365. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0473</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avola, G., Tuttobene, R., Gresta, F. and Abbate, V. (2008) Weed Control Strategies for Grain Legumes. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 389-395. 
https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davis, A.S. and Liebman, M (2003) Cropping System Effects on Giant Fox Tail (Setariat Faberi) Demography: 1 Green Manure and Tillage Training. Weed Science, 51, 919-929. https://doi.org/10.1614/P2002-133A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sosnoski, L.M. and Cardina, J. (2006) Weed Seed Bank Community Composition in a 35-Year-Old Tillage and Rotation Experiment. Weed Science, 54, 263-273. 
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-001R2.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belde, M., Mattheis, A., Sprenger, B. and Albrecht, H. (2000) Long-Term Development of Yield Affected Weeds after the Change from Conventional to Integrated and Organic Farming. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 17, 291-301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gruber, H., Haedel, K. and Broschewitz, B. (2000) Influence of Farming System on Weeds in Thresh Crops of Six-Year Crop Rotation. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 17, 33-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hald, A.B. (1999) Weed Vegetation (Wild Flora) of Long Established Organic versus Conventional Cereal Fields in Denmark. Annals of Applied Biology, 134, 307-314.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb05269.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Elsen, T. (2000) Species Diversity as a Task for Organic Agriculture in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems &amp; Environment, 77, 101-109. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00096-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buhler, D.D., Koher, K.A. Thompson, R.L. (2001) Weed Seed Bank Dynamics during Five-Year Crop Rotation. Weed Techniques, 15, 170-176. 
https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0170:WSBDDA]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akobundu, I.O. (1987) Weed Science in the Tropics, Principles and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, London, 522 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CRIN (1989) Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria Progress (In) Tree Crop Research. 2nd Edition, CRIN, 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obatolu, R.R., Okelana, F.A., Adeyemi, A.A., Fawole, E.A., Oduwole, O.O., Omolaja, S.S., Famaye, A.O. and Ojelade, K.T.M. (1998) Coffee Production Manual (Handbook of Recommendation).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moss, R.I. (1956) A Guide to Coffee Culture in Jamaica Department of Agriculture Jamaica. 55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Famaye, A.O. and Agboola, A.A. (2003) Evaluation of Weed Biomass in Coffee Canephora Intercropped with Maize, Cassava, and Plantain in Nigeria. Journal of Weed Science, 16, 9-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feitas Santos, J.C., Junior da Cunha, A. and de Melo, B. (2014) Soil Cover and Weed Control on Coffee Intercropping Perennial Legume. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 4, 149-158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nchangi, Y.K., Nkongho, R.N., Mala, W.A. and Levang, P. (2016) Efficacy of Oil Palm Intercropping by Smallholders. Case Study in South-West Cameroon. Agroforestry System, 90, 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9873-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stomp, D. (2017) Smallholder Oil Palm: Space for Diversification? Wageningen University, Wageningen, 78 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feitas Santos, J.C., Junior da Cunha, A., Ferreira, F.A., Santos, R.H.S., Sakuyama, N.S. and de Lima, P.C. (2016) Herbaceous Legumes Intercropping in Weed Management of the Coffee Crop. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 5, 91-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System for Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. USDA Handbook, No. 436, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egbe, N.E., Ayodele, E.A. and Obatolu, C.R. (1989) Soil and Nutrition of Cocoa, Coffee, Kola. Cashew and Tea. In: Progress in Tree Crop Research in Nigeria, 2nd Edition, CRIN, Ibadan, 27-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogunwale, J.A., Olaniyan, J.O. and Aduloju, M.O. (2002) Morphological, Physico-Chemical and Clay Mineralogical Properties of Soils Overlaying Basement Complex Rocks in Ilorin East, Nigeria. Moor Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 147-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obatolu, C.R. (1991) Growth and Nutrient Uptake of Coffee (Coffea spp) Seedlings Grown on Different Organic Materials. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, 276 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.98585-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adeyemi, A.A. (1997) Intercropping Coffee with Arable in Tree Crops. In: Proceeding on Coffee Production Technology Transfer Workshop, ABU College of Agriculture, Kabba Kogi State, 39-46.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>