This study was an examination of the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout among therapists working in rehabilitation hospitals. The mediating effects of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue were verified through structural equation modeling. The participants were 204 therapists working at rehabilitation hospitals located in a metropolitan area, and they completed the Emotional Dissonance Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the Professional Quality of Life Scale. The results are as follows. First, emotional dissonance, compassion satisfaction, and compassion fatigue had significant correlations with burnout. Second, mediating effects of compassion satisfaction/fatigue were found in the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout. Consequently, emotional dissonance had both direct and indirect effects on burnout. Lastly, this study’s implications, limitations and suggestions for future study are presented.
Rehabilitation refers to all therapeutic interventions performed in an effort to improve and maintain optimal sensory, physical, cognitive, psychological and social performance in persons with disabilities; rehabilitation encompasses the full range of treatment to recover patients’ quality of life (QoL). Professionals including physical therapists, occupational therapists, psychotherapists, and speech therapists who provide professional services in the field of rehabilitation are essential to improving QoL for people with disabilities. However, therapists in rehabilitation hospitals often experience burnout ( Lloyd & King, 2001), especially when a patient’s recovery is slow and the patient or caregivers feel stress about the process ( Kim, 1987). This is especially true considering that the main purpose of rehabilitation hospitals is continuous and intensive rehabilitation of patients after the acute phase of injury ( Korea Health Industry Development Institute, 2005).
Burnout is defined as emotional depletion and cynicism in helping professionals who work face to face with clients, and helping professionals are prone to experience burnout ( Delia & Patrick, 1996). Researchers have described how therapists who are experiencing burnout can experience gradual deterioration in their therapeutic skills and abilities and how burnout can lead to potential incompetence ( Cherniss, 1980; Seo, 2012; Suh & Kim, 2002; Yoo & Park, 2002); burnout in this way prevents therapists from effectively using their expertise in providing services, and there have been reports of burnouts in nurses ( Ahn, Yea, & Yeum, 2011), physical therapists ( Kim, 2014), and occupational therapists ( Lee & Jung, 2016).
Rehabilitation therapists who work in hospitals have high job stress ( Kim, 2014). They must provide therapeutic services, but they must also do emotional labor when they have to ignore or control their feelings. In this process, emotional dissonance occurs in rehabilitation therapists who have experienced burnout.
Emotional dissonance is defined as a discrepancy in emotions when there is a conflict between personal feelings and norms that require specific attitudes ( Brotheridge, 2001). Because many medical institutions place customer satisfaction first, customers now expect and demand continuously increasing levels of service from medical professionals; consequently, emotional dissonance is inevitable for emotional laborers in hospitals ( Kim & Kim, 2013). Prior research has shown that emotional dissonance causes fatigue that impedes performance, deepens burnout, and negatively affects job performance ( Dormann & Kaiser, 2002). The greater the emotional dissonance a person experiences, the more likely the person will experience a false ego, considering him- or herself as hypocritical, leading to psychological maladjustment ( Ashforch & Humphrey, 1993). Emotional dissonance causes a number of negative effects including tension, stress, burnout, alienation from true feelings, lower self-esteem, and work dissatisfaction ( Heuven & Bakker, 2003; Mann, 2004), and emotional dissonance is also closely related to burnout ( Kirk, Koeske, & Koeske, 1993).
Considering the factors that affect emotional dissonance and burnout, we proposed examining compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Compassion satisfaction refers to the joyful feelings that result from having the ability to help others ( Figley & Stamm, 1996) and the experience of contentment in the course of helping others ( Stamm, 2010). Collins & Long (2003) described compassion satisfaction as a defensive factor against compassion fatigue, a buffer against traumatic experience. Compassion fatigue, on the other hand, results from stress in the course of work, and it has a mental and emotional impact. It is similar to burnout but unique in being found only in helping professionals who work with trauma victims ( Robins, Meltzer, & Zelikovsky, 2009). Compassion fatigue is the result of emotional exhaustion from helping others ( Sabo, 2008), and it occurs more often in situations where constant compassion is required ( Fetter, 2012); it can cause anger, fatigue, headache, gastrointestinal disorders, high blood pressure, weight changes, and sleep disorders and weaken the immune system ( Figley, 2012).
Previous studies with helping professionals showed that emergency room nurses who performed frequent emotional labor experienced more emotional dissonance ( Yoon, 2003), and greater emotional dissonance reduces compassion satisfaction and increases compassion fatigue ( Jeong, 2016). Furthermore, nurses’ high compassion fatigue increased burnout ( Kim, 2011; Lee, 2015; Lee & Yom, 2013), and the same result was obtained in a study of firefighters ( Kim, 2019). Compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue are related to burnout: Stamm (2010) observed that the former decreases the possibility of burnout while the latter increases possibilities of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. In addition, high compassion satisfaction reduces burnout due to work-related stress ( Conrad & Kellar-Guenther, 2006; Robertson & Gow, 2011; Stamm, 2002), acts as a protective mechanism against secondary traumatic stress, and maintains mental well-being ( Collins & Long, 2003).
Based on these findings, we aimed with this study to investigate the relationships between emotional dissonance, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout in therapists in various fields in rehabilitation hospitals. Based on findings that compassion satisfaction is a source of strength for continuing work in high-stress jobs while compassion fatigue increases burnout ( Jeon & Ha, 2012; Kim, 2011), we assumed that compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue would have a mediating effect on the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout. Few investigators have examined the paths between emotional dissonance, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout at the same time. Thus, the aim of this study was to provide basic data for reducing burnout in rehabilitation therapists and preparing necessary preventive interventions for them.
As presented in
This study entailed a survey of 204 therapists working in two rehabilitation hospitals located in a metropolitan area. We excluded two questionnaires for incomplete response data, leaving 202 questionnaires for the data analysis. The participants’ mean age was 28.79 ± 4.85 years and the other demographic characteristics of the participants were presented in
We conducted this study after receiving research approval from the Seoul Rehabilitation Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. SRH2018R-04); the distributed surveys were either on paper or online. We provided the following
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 81 | 40.1 |
| Female | 121 | 59.9 | |
| Education level | Vocational college graduate | 34 | 16.8 |
| College graduate | 138 | 68.3 | |
| Master’s degree holder | 30 | 14.9 | |
| Total work experience | <1 year | 27 | 13.3 |
| 1 - 5 years | 70 | 34.7 | |
| 5 - 10 years | 80 | 39.6 | |
| 10 - 15 years | 15 | 7.4 | |
| >15 years | 10 | 5.0 | |
| Specific job | Physical therapist | 102 | 50.5 |
| Occupational therapist | 77 | 38.1 | |
| Speech therapist | 12 | 5.9 | |
| Psychotherapist | 10 | 5.0 | |
| others | 1 | 0.5 |
information on the first page of the questionnaire: the purpose of the study and the fact that all questionnaires were anonymous, the survey could be discontinued at any time if participants wanted to stop, and the collected data were used for research purposes only. After participants signed a consent form, they began responding. The questionnaire was in the order of the Emotional Dissonance Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and the Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5. When they completed the surveys, participants received small gifts in appreciation of their time.
· Emotional Dissonance Scale. Park (2008) developed the Emotional Dissonance Scale to fit hospital employees based on Kruml & Geddes’ (2000) Dimensions of Emotional Labor. The scale is composed of four items rated on a seven-point Likert scale; one sample scale item is “Sometimes it is hard because I show feelings to patients that do not match my real feelings,” and higher scores indicate greater emotional dissonance. Park reported a Cronbach’s α of 0.78, while it was 0.86 in this study. Because this was a single-factor scale, we randomly assigned the items to construct two parcels for analysis.
· Maslach Burnout Inventory. Maslach & Jackson (1981) developed the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), and it was translated and modified by Lee (2011). The MBI consists of three sub-factors: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decrease in personal accomplishment. The emotional exhaustion subscale measures psychological overload and feelings of fatigue at work. The depersonalization subscale assesses one’s degree of dehumanization, that is, treating service recipients in a cold way. The decrease in personal accomplishment subscale measures feelings of incompetence and unsuccessful achievements in work with people. The MBI is composed of nine items for emotional exhaustion, five for depersonalization, and eight for decrease in personal accomplishment, for a total of 22 items, all rated on five-point Likert scales (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree); the higher the score, the higher the burnout. Lee found a Cronbach’s α of 0.80 for the MBI, and the alpha was 0.89 in this study.
· Professional Quality of Life Scale. We employed the Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5 (ProQOL-5) to assess compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in the participants. The ProQOL-5 was developed by Stamm (2009) and is composed of three subscales measuring compassion satisfaction, burnout, and compassion fatigue. We used the compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue subscales; each has ten items rated on a five-point Likert scale. For the compassion fatigue subscale, we used eight items after excluding two items that did not belong to the factor; the higher the score, the stronger the construct. Stamm reported that the Cronbach’s α was 0.88 for compassion satisfaction and 0.81 for compassion fatigue. In this study, we found that Cronbach’s α was 0.89 for compassion satisfaction and 0.66 for compassion fatigue. Because this was a single-factor scale, we randomly assigned the items to construct two parcels for analysis.
We analyzed the data using IBM SPSS 24.0 and AMOS 21.0. First, we identified the demographic characteristics of the study participants and established the reliability of the measurement tools; then we calculated descriptive statistics and conducted correlation analyses. We checked skewness and kurtosis to judge normality, which is the basic assumption of a structural equation model.
Second, we performed confirmatory factor analysis to validate the model, checking the fit and factor load of the measurement model. We used the absolute fit index RMSEA and the central fit index TLI and CFI to test the measurement model’s goodness of fit ( Hong, 2000). The Tucker-Lewis and comparative fit indices are considered to indicate high model fit at 0.9 and above; for RMSEA, below 0.05 is very good, below 0.08 is good, and below 0.10 is moderate ( Woo, 2012).
Third, we analyzed the research model using AMOS 21, using RMSEA, TLI, and CFI to verify the research model’s fit ( Hong, 2000). Finally, we examined the indirect effect through the path coefficient of the final model and performed bootstrapping to verify the mediating effect.
We analyzed the correlations between each variable, and the results are shown in
Before we verified the research model, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis to validate the measurement variables. The factor loadings of the measurement variables ranged from 0.55 to 0.96, which were estimated as a significant path. Specifically, the loadings for emotional dissonance were 0.84 and 0.95, and those for compassion satisfaction were 0.96 and 0.89. The compassion fatigue factor loadings were 0.80 and 0.66, and the burnout loadings were 0.65, 0.73, and 0.55. We judged the measurement model to be appropriate.
Next, we examined the overall fit of the measurement model. We found the
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED | 1. ED1 | – | ||||||||
| 2. ED2 | 0.79** | – | ||||||||
| CS | 3. CS1 | −0.21** | −0.27** | – | ||||||
| 4. CS2 | −0.19** | −0.21** | 0.85** | – | ||||||
| CF | 5. CF1 | 0.29** | 0.30** | −0.17* | 0.15* | – | ||||
| 6. CF2 | 0.25** | 0.19** | −0.06 | −0.06 | 0.53** | – | ||||
| B | 7. DP | 0.35** | 0.41** | −0.36** | −0.32** | 0.44** | 0.31** | – | ||
| 8. EE | 0.46** | 0.53** | −0.43** | −0.39** | 0.41** | 0.36** | 0.53** | – | ||
| 9. PA | 0.21** | 0.23** | −0.57** | −0.56** | 0.22** | 0.13 | 0.36** | 0.32** | – | |
| Mean | 3.77 | 4.09 | 3.48 | 3.55 | 2.50 | 2.43 | 1.93 | 2.78 | 2.44 | |
| S.D. | 1.21 | 1.27 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.42 | |
| Skewness | −0.31 | −0.38 | −0.03 | −0.08 | −0.03 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.36 | 0.41 | |
| Kurtosis | −0.46 | −0.05 | −0.21 | −0.26 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.21 | −0.04 | 0.31 | |
Note. ED: Emotional Dissonance, CS: Compassion Satisfaction, CF: Compassion Fatigue, B: Burnout, DP: Depersonalization, EE: Emotional Exhaustion, PA: Personal accomplishment, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
| Variable | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Emotional Dissonance | – | |||
| 2. Compassion Satisfaction | −0.24** | – | ||
| 3. Compassion Fatigue | 0.31** | −0.13 | – | |
| 4. Burnout | 0.53** | −0.57** | 0.47** | – |
**p < 0.01.
following results: χ2 (N = 202, df = 21) = 55.91 (p < 0.001), CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.93, and RMSEA = 0.09. Therefore, the overall fit of the measurement model we used in this study was appropriate.
We set a research model and a competition model as follows: The research model assumed a partial mediation effect of compassion satisfaction/fatigue in the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout, while the competition model assumed a complete mediation effect that did not include a direct path between emotional dissonance and burnout. The results of confirming the goodness of fit are presented in
Next, we verified the path coefficients and significance of the final model. As shown in
We conducted bootstrap analysis to verify the mediating effects of compassion
| χ2 | df | p | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research model | 56.68 | 22 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.09 (0.06 ~ 0.12) |
| Competition model | 76.06 | 23 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.11 (0.08 ~ 0.13) |
Note. CI: Confidence Interval.
| Route | B | β | S.E. | C.R. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED → CS | −0.15 | −0.29*** | 0.04 | −3.80 |
| ED → CF | 0.18 | 0.39*** | 0.04 | 4.48 |
| CS → Burnout | −0.38 | −0.52*** | 0.06 | −6.80 |
| CF → Burnout | 0.40 | 0.48*** | 0.08 | 4.77 |
| ED → Burnout | 0.13 | 0.35*** | 0.03 | 4.47 |
Note. ED: Emotional Dissonance, CS: Compassion Satisfaction, CF: Compassion Fatigue, Β: unstandardized coefficients, β: standardized coefficients, S.E.: standard error, C.R.: critical ratio, ***p < 0.001.
satisfaction/fatigue in the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout. The indirect effects and confidence intervals of the mediation model are presented in
The results obtained in this study are summarized as follows. First, the three predictors of burnout—emotional dissonance, compassion satisfaction, and compassion fatigue—had significant correlations with burnout. Second, mediating effects of compassion satisfaction/fatigue were found in the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout; in other words, emotional dissonance affected compassion satisfaction/fatigue, which in turn affected burnout. Consequently, emotional dissonance had both direct and indirect effects on burnout.
For this study, we examined the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout in therapists working in rehabilitation hospitals, and we explored the mediating effects of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in the process. The conclusion and their implications are as follows.
First, all predictors of burnout we used in this study showed significant positive and negative correlations with burnout. Emotional dissonance had a strong positive correlation, which supported the previous findings on the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout ( Kirk et al., 1993; Lewig & Dollard, 2003; Morris & Feldman, 1996; Suh & Kim, 2002). In the previous studies, the study subjects were case managers, call center workers, and psychotherapists. Therefore, we expanded the scope of subjects, and we confirmed that therapists in rehabilitation hospitals also experience emotional dissonance and eventually burnout when they suppress or disguise their actual feelings in their professional roles.
The reduction in burnout with increased compassion satisfaction is in line with findings from previous studies ( Collins & Long, 2003; Jun, 2013; Kim, 2013; Slocum-Gori, 2011; Stamm, 2002; Yang, 2013; Yom & Kim, 2012). Previous researchers obtained their results from nurses and hospice and mental health
| Path | Indirect effects | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||
| ED → CS → Burnout | 0.08*** | 0.02 | 0.19 |
| ED → CF → Burnout | 0.15*** | 0.05 | 0.30 |
Note. CI: Confidence Interval, ED: Emotional Dissonance, CS: Compassion Satisfaction, CF: Compassion Fatigue, ***p < 0.001.
care workers, and we have added findings for rehabilitation therapists. Consistently across all of these groups, compassion satisfaction reduced the risk of burnout. Similarly, increased burnout that accompanied compassion fatigue was consistent across subjects, and the findings in this study supported that conclusion.
Second, in the relationship between therapists’ emotional dissonance and burnout, we observed partial mediating effects of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. This study’s important contribution lies in how our findings integrate with the results of previous studies. Specifically, previous researchers examined the relationships among individual constructs: In one study, emotional dissonance had a statistically significant effect on compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue ( Jeong, 2016). Other studies have shown that compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue have a significant effect on burnout ( Friedman, 2002; Kim, 2011; Shin, 2007). With this study, we could observe both direct and indirect effects by examining these relationships together.
The implications of this study are as follows. First, we identified factors that affect burnout specifically among therapists working in rehabilitation hospitals, an understudied population. The findings indicate that the greater their emotional dissonance, the more rehabilitation therapists experience burnout. Most service employment suggests rules for expressing feelings that make the other person feel better, including kindness and patience ( Park & Shin, 2011; Seffrin, 2002), and rehabilitation hospitals are no exception; this explains why hospital therapists are more likely to experience emotional dissonance. However, considering the results of this study, finding ways to reduce emotional dissonance and preparing countermeasures are necessary for reducing rehabilitation therapist burnout.
Second, this study is meaningful in that we examined the relationships between emotional dissonance, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout all together. For this study, we investigated the influences of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue as the mediators on the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout. Researchers have examined these relationships individually, but few have looked at them together. In addition, it is meaningful that we could integrate the results of previous studies and model the associations between the predictors of burnout.
Third, we detailed how rehabilitation therapists’ emotional dissonance led to burnout by discovering the mediating effects of compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue in the relationship between emotional dissonance and burnout. Unresolved compassion fatigue eventually leads to burnout, and burnout causes physical, mental, and emotional exhaustion. It reduces therapists’ quality of care and professionalism and increases turnover potential, which affects hospital management. Therefore, efforts to reduce burnout among rehabilitation therapists are necessary. Because compassion fatigue can be prevented and treated ( Lombardo & Eyle, 2011), effective interventions to minimize it in therapists need to be developed.
The limitations of this study are as follows. First, we examined therapists in rehabilitation hospitals in Korea, so there is limited generalizability of our results to all rehabilitation therapists. Second, we did not cover all possible variables that could affect the burnout. Therefore, other factors may affect burnout in rehabilitation therapists in addition to the factors we examined.
There might be suggestions for future studies. First, it is important to reduce compassion fatigue to reduce burnout in therapists, and qualitative research will be needed for in-depth analyses of the compassion fatigue experienced by therapists. Second, based on the findings from this study, interventions to reduce burnout should be developed and studied, and further research will be needed to verify their effectiveness. We hope that these findings and those from future studies will contribute to the well-being of the therapists in rehabilitation hospitals.
This paper is part of Hee Jin Kim’s thesis for 2019 Master’s degree.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Kim, H. J., Ha, J. H., & Jue, J. (2020). Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue, Emotional Dissonance, and Burnout in Therapists in Rehabilitation Hospitals. Psychology, 11, 190-203. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.111013