Ectopic pregnancy is the implantation of an embryo outside the uterine cavity. Tubal pregnancy is one of the ectopic pregnancy, which frequency is around 1.3% - 2.4% [1] [2]. Treatment strategies involve watchful waiting, surgery, medical treatment such as methotrexate [2]. Surgery is the primary treatment approach for tubal pregnancy with massive hemorrhage. However, deciding between open surgery and laparoscopic surgery remains debatable [3] [4], because of their individual characteristics. These reports indicated that laparoscopic surgery might be difficult owing to unfamiliarity and the learning curves for surgeons, anesthetists, and operation theater nursing staff. In this case report, we present four cases of tubal pregnancy with massive hemoperitoneum that were treated by laparoscopic surgery and provide tips for the treatment of massive hemoperitoneum. All patients had given their consent for the case report to be published.

Patient background is presented in Table 1. The patient age ranged from 20 to 37 years. The gestational age was 5 - 8 weeks from the last menstrual day in cases 1 and 2, and from the ovulation day in case 3. The gestational sac diameter ranged from 20 to 76 mm, and the serum hCG level ranged from 7280 to 15,604 mIU/mL. In case 2, serum hCG was not measured because a fetal heartbeat was noted.

Cases 1 and 4 had intra-abdominal hemorrhage of >2000 mL, and they experienced rupture of the isthmus of the left tube. The shock index (SI) surpassed 1 in all cases, except case 4.

*Not measured because of fetal heartbeat.

Tubal pregnancy was confirmed according to serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels and ultrasonographic landmarks, including 1) presence of a gestational sac outside of the uterus, 2) an empty uterine cavity, and 3) a clearly visible empty cervical canal.

Laparoscopic surgery was started with necessary preparations or with blood transfusion in parallel. The approach (salpingotomy or salpingectomy) was jointly decided by the surgeon and the patient on consideration of the size of the tubal mass, the desire to have a baby, the history of tubal pregnancy on the ipsilateral side, and the risk of persistent ectopic pregnancy. With regard to the procedure, a laparoscope was inserted into the abdominal cavity from a 10-mm umbilical incision using the open access technique, and three additional trocars were introduced at the lower portion of the abdomen under direct vision. An adequate visual field was established by creating pneumoperitoneum at a pressure of 8 mmHg.

However, the massive hemoperitoneum caused difficulty securing the visual field. Bleeding may be immediately stopped by lifting the pregnancy lesion with a pair of forceps (Figure 1(a), Figure 1(b)).

The surgical approach was decided after consultation with the anesthesiologist and after taking into consideration the patient’s characteristics.

According to the system for emergency surgery, laparoscopic surgery is possible 24 h through the on-call system for obstetricians and anesthesiologists.

Case 1 was a 20-year-old woman who was 5 weeks pregnancy. She experienced massive hemoperitoneum owing to rupture of the isthmus related to pregnancy. Considering that the dorsal position is difficult to execute owing to abdominal pain, the patient was intubated in the lateral decubitus position. On the other hand, the time spent from entering the operating room to starting surgery by anesthesia introduction was 57 min. The abdominal hemorrhage volume was 2700 mL. The clots were difficult to vacuum, but the lesion was identified by scooping the left tube without vacuuming all clots (Figure 1(a)). Considering a diagnosis of isthmus tube rupture, we performed left salpingectomy. The preoperative SI was 1.5, and we started blood transfusion before the surgery to prevent deterioration of the hemodynamic condition. The patient received 6 units of red blood cells, 10 units of fresh-frozen plasma, 15 units of platelets, and 3000 units of antithrombin III. The patient required 10 days of hospitalization after surgery without any treatment because of pleural effusion and atelectasis owing to rapid blood transfusion.

Case 2 was a 37-year-old woman who was 8weeks pregnant. The lesion was left ampullary tube and the maximum size of the gestational sac was 76 mm. This case is the only case that confirmed fetal heart beat. Considering a diagnosis of left ampullary tube pregnancy, we performed left salpingectomy. Blood inside of abdomen was vacuumed to secure the field of view before lifting the fallopian tube, and thus, the operative time increased as 141 min. However, the time from starting surgery to starting insufflation was fast as 4 min. The abdominal hemorrhage volume was 1100 mL.

Case 3 was a 36-year-old woman who was 6 weeks pregnant. She got pregnant after internal uterine insemination at our hospital. We considered a diagnosis of left ampullary tube pregnancy, we performed left salpingectomy. The abdominal hemorrhage volume was 850 mL. Although the preoperative SI was 1.3, blood transfusion was not needed.

Case 4 was a 37-year-old woman who was 8 weeks pregnant. Owing to sudden abdominal pain, she was transported by ambulance to the hospital. Her blood pressure was 79/39 mmHg, which was low. Her pulse rate was 52 beats/min, and the SI was 0.7. Vaginal ultrasonography showed the gestational sac close to the left ovary, and it was not inside the uterus. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage was noted, with an estimated volume of >1000 mL. The time spent from entering the operating room to starting surgery was 18 min, and the time spent from starting surgery to starting insufflation was 2 min. The left tube was scooped before vacuuming all the blood, and we could reach the lesion. A left isthmus tubal pregnancy was noted, and left salpingectomy was performed. The patient received 4 units of red blood cells, 4 units of fresh-frozen plasma, and 1500 units of antithrombin III. Her vital signs were stable during and after the surgery. All cases were completely treated by laparoscopic surgery. None of these patients had persistent ectopic pregnancy.

The operative time of each case is shown in Table 2. The average time spent from entering the operating room to starting surgery by anesthesia introduction and facility apparatus preparation was 33 ± 9 min. In case 1, the anesthesia time was extended owing to difficulty in maintaining the position for abdominal pain. From the start of insufflation, we reached the lesion within 7 min in cases 1, 3, and 4. However, in case 2, blood was vacuumed to secure the field of view before lifting the fallopian tube, and thus, the time increased. The tips to shorten the operation time and avoid increasing hemorrhage were leaching and stopping bleeding by grapping the lesion as soon as possible.

Deciding between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for ectopic pregnancy is controversial because each approach has its own characteristics [3] [4]. Although laparoscopic surgery is less invasive than open surgery, the former might depend on the technique of the surgeon and the status of facilities, including the preparation of the equipment, before bleeding is controlled. Open surgery has been generally preferred in hemorrhagic shock cases [5]. However, technical improvements and interest in minimally invasive treatments have raised the demand for laparoscopic surgery, and it has advanced to adaptive expansion rapidly in recent years [6].

Various reports have compared laparoscopic surgery with laparotomy [7] [8] [9] [10], and these reports have identified many advantages of laparoscopic surgery and its non-inferiority when compared with laparotomy. In particular, smaller bleeding amount; shorter operative time, hospitalization duration, and recovery duration; and lower pain were suggested for laparoscopic surgery when compared with laparotomy (Table 3).

In the present study, the median hospitalization duration of the four laparoscopic surgery cases was 4.5 days (range, 3 - 12 days). In open surgery cases, the hospitalization duration is generally a minimum of 7 days. Hence, the burden on patients is lower with laparoscopic surgery than with open surgery.

Tubal pregnancy is the most common ectopic pregnancy, accounting for over

OR: operating room, NA: not available.

95% of cases [11]. However, the risk of bleeding varies according to the pregnancy site. Thus, preoperative evaluation and diagnosis are important. Among the four cases in this report, two that had a bleeding volume of >2000 mL were diagnosed with isthmus tube pregnancy, which might be associated with increased bleeding when compared with that for ampullary tube pregnancy.

All cases presented SI > 1 or low blood pressure, and two cases needed blood transfusion. Even the cases that present bleeding volume of >2000 ml and SI > 1 may be treated by laparoscopic surgery with appropriate hydration and blood transfusion.

Although the ampullary and fimprial pregnancies are the most common sites of ectopic pregnancy [11], two of four cases were isthmic pregnancies in current report. There is a report that the risk of ruptured ectopic pregnancy was greater for cornual and isthmic pregnancies compared with ampullary-fimbrial pregnancies, but logistic regression analysis identified no significance [12].

Presently, we do not adopt autologous blood transfusion for ectopic pregnancy to prevent amniotic fluid and villus contamination. However, some reports have suggested the feasibility of autologous blood transfusion for ectopic pregnancy [13] [14].

We encountered four cases of tubal pregnancy with massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and they were successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery. To initiate surgery without deterioration of the hemodynamic condition, blood transfusion can be started simultaneously with preparation for laparoscopic surgery. Lifting the pregnancy lesion with a pair of forceps can help immediately to stop bleeding, even if it is difficult to secure the visual field owing to massive bleeding. When there is difficulty in anesthesia or isthmus pregnancy, care should be taken to avoid an increase in the amount of bleeding associated with extension of the perioperative period.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Oishi, S., Mekaru, K., Miyagi, M., Akamine, K., Heshiki, C. and Aoki, Y. (2020) Tubal Pregnancy with Acute Bleeding Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery: Tips and Case Presentation. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 10, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2020.101009