Quartz arenite of first cycle origin (95% - 100% quartz) has been relatively rarely encountered throughout the Phanerozoic [2] [3] [4] [5].

Its genesis, in combination with kaolinite neoformation [6] [7] [8] [9], has been predominantly interpreted as by chemical weathering, mostly under warm humid climate (pH: 5 - 6) and by diagenetic processes like intrastratal solution [10] [11] [12] [13], thereby underlying qualitative/quantitative reduction of the source areas’ primary mineral content.

There seems a general agreement among insiders that the agents mentioned above, do not only dissolve so-called “unstable” and “stable” heavy minerals, but may also attack or partially dissolve “ultra-stable heavies”, the latter by effects of hydrothermal pore water under increasing burial depth (Figure 1(A)), whereby carbonate cement and clayey matrix would commonly retard such progressive corrosion.

Undoubtedly, in such cases the interpretation of source areas by using heavy minerals for provenance analysis becomes rather delicate or even useless.

However, there is evidence by the KPB-event (Chicxclub Crater, Yucatan,

Mexico: ~65 Ma) that overwhelming “sturz rain” initiated by a major impact owning high temperature and extreme acidity (pH < 4), has global effect on Earth’s atmosphere and surface [15] [16] [17] [18].

Calculations tell of some several billion tons of such acid precipitation by an impact.

The extreme high acidity of hot “sturz rain” primarily relates to the enormous impact energy causing the disintegration of N₂ and O₂ molecules of the atmosphere to react generating nitric oxides (NO_x) in connection with hot whirl-storms and more or less global precipitation of even boiling water. Their reaction with water generates nitrous acid (HNO₂) and nitric acid (HNO₃). The same reactions concern other relevant gases like CO₂ " carbonic acid (H₂CO₃), SO₂ " sulfuric acid (H₂SO₃/H₂SO₄), and both HF " fluoric acid and HCl " chloric acid providing by their mixture pH-values < 4 depending on crater distance [9] [15] [16] [17] [18].

In case of the KPB-event, the impactor interacted with the atmosphere (78.9% N₂, 20% O₂, 1% CO₂), with a seawater column of ~100 m (C1, N, S, F), some 2900 m interstratified carbonate and sulfate rocks (CO₂, SO₂), and finally with a ~30 km granite sequence of the basement (C1, N, S, F) [17] (Table 1). Figure 2 shows the basic mineralogical data of the KPB-event at Agosta, Spain exposing kaolinite boundary clay and C and O-isotope distribution around the extinction layer [17] [19].

Beyond that, experiments surprisingly verify that a mixture of HNO₃ (1/6 of 5%), H₂SO₄ (1/6 of 5%) and HF (2/3 of 5%) dealing with 200 ml for dissolution of 10 gram of rock sample dissolve common β-quartz in order to enrich both high pressure SiO₂-modifications coesite and stishovite from shock wave deformed silicate rocks inferring that β-quartz and other silicates of different rock types are dissolvable under the high acidity applied [20].

Reconfirming Stoeffler’s experiments in nature, one of our master students (G. Ramme) found, by additional investigations to his Diploma Thesis [21], highly corroded quartz grains in upper most Maastrichtian quartz arenites at Uhry, North Germany (Figure 1(B)), deposited in both rim synclines of a salt

diapir in trap position. We relate this evidence of high acidity to the KPB-event (65 Ma) and/or to the later Popigai/Chesapeake-events (36.5/36.1 Ma) shortly prior to the Eocene/Oligocene b. (33.75 Ma), see for comparison [22]. Pre-KPB plume effects cannot be excluded.

Furthermore, toxic metals (Al, Be, Pb, Hg, Cd, Ti, Cu, Fe, Ni, Mn, Sr, V, U and Zn) frequently substituted in common minerals of relevant rocks and soils are released in soluble form for subsequent toxic reaction [18]. Thus, i.e. Fe³⁺ may be washed out from clastic deposits to lose its reddish/brownish color (red beds) for later re-precipitation.

Hence, the concept submitted tells: if such highly acid solutions initiated by major impacting volcanism work in situ through a certain timespan in a suitable geologic setting of arkosic/subarkosic sandstones, mature first cycle quartz arenites may be the product, in paragenesis with kaolinite neoformation.

In order to have a solid ground for testing the temporal coincidence of impact age with sedimentary implications like formation boundaries, sequence-analytical patterns (SB, MFS), architectural elements, lithofacies, and mineral content, we apply the major impact data of Price [23] as we did in a former pilot study [24] in Jordan [24].

Price recovered such convulsive events by using the plate tectonic parameters of abrupt change of both direction and speed of plates’ motion. He applied the ATLAS-SYSTEM (version 3.3) developed by A. Smith and co-workers, Cambridge University, England as mapping global reconstruction system for P.C. in order to design maps and tracks of continental bodies or individual islands through various Phanerozoic episodes. Figure 3 shows the tracks of Fennoscandia (A) and of Hawaii (B) during the early Paleozoic and Figure 4 follows the tracks of South America (A) and Africa (B) during the Lower Cretaceous.

Thus, the ATLAS-SYSTEM represents a map-making package comprising EULER-rotations and a variety of utilities for creating paleogeographic reconstructions for the last 600 Ma. It provides estimates of the past position of present-day shaped coastlines.

This paper tries to check the relevance of Price’s Major Impacts to quartz arenites under the aspect of indirectly initiated super-acidic “sturz rain” conditions by analyzing the following Phanerozoic quartz arenites deposited on the Arabian Platform across Jordan (Figure 5). As for mineralogic comparison, an arkosic/subarkosic sequence (Saleb F.) is added.

- Saleb F.: Lower Cambrian, arkosic/subarkosic arenite (0 - 70 m).

- Burj/White Fine Sandstone F.: Early/Middle Cambrian developed intraformationally from subarkosic to quartz arenite (max. 110 m).

- Umm Ishrin F.: Middle/Upper Cambrian, quartz arenite (max. 110 m).

- Disi F.: Upper Cambrian/Early Ordovician Quartz arenite (250 m).

- Um Sahm F.: Arenig¹, quartz² arenite (250 m).

- Kurnub F.: Lower Cretaceous, intraformational transition from sub-arkosic to quartz arenite (upper part) (220 m).

Two other quartz arenite sequences of the same geological setting (Arabian Platform) as the Permo-Triassic Umm Irna F. and the Lower Triassic Ma’in/Dardur F. are intended to be possibly dealt with separately.

The Arabian Plate comprises the Arabian Shield, the adjoining Arabian Platform,

and the surrounding sedimentary basins [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]. It was part of Gondwana through the Paleozoic era and developed as a result of late Proterozoic suturing of several terranes dominated by largely basic volcanism and plutonic rocks that were localized along the NE and WNW-trending basement sutures like the Najd strike slip movement (Figure 6, Figure 7).

The chronostratigraphic data relate to Sharland et al. [30], recalibrated and adapted by Haq & Al-Qahtani [31], re-applied by Schneider et al. [32] (Figure 5, Figure 8).

In SW Jordan, as the northwestern part of the Arabian Plate, the Pan-African calc-alkali granitoids (625 - 600 Ma) were succeeded by the Volcano-Sedimentary Pan-African Molasse Sequence represented by the Saramuj Conglomerate (600 -

595 Ma), [33] [34] [35]. After several phases the Pan-African Mountain Building completed the Gondwana formation around the Precambrian/Cambrian b. (550 - 542 Ma) (Figure 5).

Gondwana’s central parts were dominated by late Proterozoic Island complexes built up of ophiolites and basaltic/andesitic volcanics intruded by granitoids and accompanied by metamorphics [27] [28]. These rock suites provided the siliciclastics of the complete early Paleozoic sequences of Jordan (~1700 m) and finally almost all Phanerozoic clastics until Cretaceous.

Thus, the “Jordanian Platform” represented throughout the Phanerozoic a sensitive transition zone between the stable Arabian Shield and the Tethys Seaway, where predominantly a warm humid climate and eustasy were the most controlling factors in regard to paleogeography, architectural sedimentary elements, and clastics’ mineral assemblages [5] [30] [31] [32]. These siliciclastic series mostly reveal second and third order sequences separated by regional unconformities/hiatus where stratigraphic b. are mainly related to Sequence b. (SB) and Maximum Flooding Surface (MFS) (Figure 5, Figure 8).

The early Cambrian uplift caused wide-spread erosion during the block faulting Molasse-Phase of the Pan-African Mountain-Building and was followed by proximal alluvial fans of the Saleb F. (526.5 - 514 Ma), [32] [33] [34] [35] [36]. The important Pre-Siq/Angudan Unconformity (SB) is overlain by the Burj F. composed of interstratified marine carbonates and the braid plain deltaic White Fine Sandstone F. of Middle Cambrian age (514 - 506 Ma). Anoxic blackshale represents a MFS as a maximum Tethys ingression due to global sea level rise [30] [31] [32] (Figure 9).

After the Tethys regression increasing detrital influx provided northward prograding sand flats of the Umm Ishrin F. (Middle/Late Cambrian) rarely invaded by Cruziana-bearing shale where a monotonous downstream accretion (DA) dominated in a High-Stand-System-Tract (506 - 505.5 - 496 Ma), [32] [36] [37].

The Umm Ishrin/Disi F. b. is a “problematic fact in question” discussed as hiatus/unconformity. This boundary marks an abrupt change from low/medium energy bedded DA-macroforms to thick-bedded high energy DA-macroforms of massive sedimentary load building up some 10 - 12 fining upward sequences of the Disi F. [32] [38] (Figure 10(A), Figure 10(B)).

That demands a dramatic change of atmospheric conditions (“sturz rain”-events). The DA-macroforms are frequently overturned and own flow-structures, deposited under critical transport velocity and accompanied by isolated well rounded scattered quartz pebbles (up to 12 cm^Φ) and lag-deposits at the base of fining upward sequences (Figure 11).

Shales intercalated in the middle/upper part of the Disi F. bear Cruclana furcifera and other Cr. ichnofacies of early Ordovician age representing a MFS (~486 Ma), [38] [39] [40].

So it seems probable that the base of the Disi F, has to be set into the Upper Cambrian, or even coinciding with the Middle/Upper Cambrian b. (501 Ma).

At the Disi/Umm Sahm F. b. (483 Ma) a slight sea level rise transferred the fluvial dominated braid plains of the Disi F. towards a fluvial dominated braid plain delta bearing marine ichnofauna and intertidal/mixed flats, so becoming increasingly marine [32] [38] [39].

The Umm Sahm/Hiswah F. b. (~ 474 Ma) coincides with a SB on the Arabian Plate and the onset of south hemisphere glaciation. It is followed by an important transgression that developed from shore face to off shore environment represented by graptolite-bearing black shales (MFS: 469 Ma), as an anoxic event on ocean floor (Figure 8).

Geologic Setting and Paleogeography of the Lower Cretaceous (Kurnub Group)

This sequence crops out east of the Jordan Rift shoulder between Ras en Naqab in the south and the Zerqa River in the north [41].

During the Lower Cretaceous (145.5 Ma), also exposing quartz arenite across Jordan, the general Paleogeography between the Arabian/Nubian Shield and the Tethys Seaway remained more or less similar like during the early Paleozoic.

The Near East was affected from the Jurassic/Cretaceous b. until the Hauterivian by orogenic movements accompanied by volcanic activity across the Levant that left a hiatus with paleosol in North Jordan overlain with quartz arenites [41] [42] (Figures 12-14).

From time to time marine incursions occurred onto the Jordanian platform. However, most of the study area was part of proximal to distal braid plains whose hinterland provided up to 220 m of siliciclastics through the time-span Hauterivian until the Lower/Upper Cretaceous b (99 Ma).

While North Jordan exposes three main transgressive incursions onto the platform that relate to global sea level rise, the fining upward cycles of quartz arenite in central and south Jordan remained without marine influence (Figure 14). In areas of marine influence the Kurnub Group reveals a highly differentiated

spectrum of various sedimentary environments of interbedded shelf carbonates, tidal flats, coastal swamps and lignites [41].

The source rock composition of the Nubian/Arabian hinterland has to be interpreted, according to heavy mineral analysis, as similar like that of the early Paleozoic Series.

Price [23] applied his track dates of plates for the time-span 600 - 250 Ma to both Fennoscandia (Figure 3(A)) and Hawaii/Pacific (Figure 3(B)). Most of sudden changes (direction, velocity) of both plates reveal high coincidence in time. One difference concerns the 526.4 Ma-event of Hawaii to be correlated with the St. David/Merioneth b. (523 Ma) and the 514 Ma-event of Fennoscandia to be correlated with the Maentwrog/Dolgellian b. (514 Ma). As he stresses, both references are of equal validity. Since dating moves in a process of refinement (recalibration), he is aware of age error bars of up to 5%. However, most of the relevant early Paleozoic track changes (550, 502, 456/455 ~441 Ma) coincide with major stratigraphic boundaries (Figure 5, Figure 8).

Thus, he does not hesitate to conclude that major impacts were controlling, driving or even determining the Geologic History throughout the early Paleozoic.

Plate 1. Landscape scenarios of Phanerozoic Arenite Formations, Jordan. (A) Cambrian section located in the Numeira area (Southeastern end of the Dead Sea). Lower part: lower Cambrian (Saleb F.): fluvial sand flats (S). Middle part: Middle Cambrian (Burj F.): composed of two marine ingression (pelites P), Mixed tidal flats bearing Rusophycus, intertidal and lagoonal pelites, massive and slightly bedded intertidal and Sabkha dolomites (D) correlates with worldwide sea level rise. Both MFSs are situated in the top part of the pelites, Upper part: (Upper Cambrian: Umm Ishrin F.) fluvial sandflats, 3 D megaripple facies and DA elements of median transport energy. (B) Fluvial-deltaic downward accretion elements of the Disi F. (Upper Cambrian-Tremadoc), intercalated with a dark-red marine ingression by pelite-bearing Cruziana furcifera (Lower Ordovician), Disi area. South Jordan. Length of outcrop ~ 80 m.

Plate 2. Architectural elements and lithofacies of Phanerozoic Quartz Arenites. (A) Fluvial downward accretion elements of moderate transport energy. Umm Ishrin F. (Upper Cambrian), section height ~100 meters, Jebel Ram. (B) Fining upward mass flow (Gms) indicating a hazardous flash-flood in the transition zone Umm Ishrin/Disi F., northern Wadi Ram. (C) Fine-grained bar sediments occupied by Scolithos-Ichnofacies dipping east northeastward. Their top portions reveal south/north-directed channel fill (St), also bearing Scolithos in the uppermost laminated part (Sh), Wadi Abu Khusheiba. (D) High transport energy—directed overturned cross bedding in the Disi F., downstream accretion braided streams, Disi area. B. Amireh. Jordan University, Amman (1986). (E) Cruziana furcifera in red marine pelites indicating Lower Ordovician age, Jebel Amud, Disi area. (F) Jebel Amud, west of Disi; below: Quartz arenite (Umm Ishrin F.), (dark) overlain with quartz arenite of the Disi F. (white) that is intercalated by a few meters thick marine dark pelite-bearing Cruziana furcifera of Lower Ordovician age (arrow).

Plate 3. SEM and thin section photomicrographs of Phanerozoic Arenites. (A) Syntaxial overgrowth of quartz in quartz arenite, Umm Ishrin F., Wadi Zerqa Ma’in [50]. (B) Lower Cretaceous quartz arenite showing a porosity of ~25% and poor syntaxial overgrowth. Note the angular form of quartz grains, Wadi Zerqa Ma’in [50]. (C) Epitaxy of neoformed kaolinite/dickte crystals on syntaxally overgrown quartz grain. Umm Ishrin f./Upper Cambrian, Wadi Zerqa Ma’in [50]. (D) Like (C) however, partial replacement of quartz by dickite neoformation [50]. (E) Dickite-neoformation in pore space of Umm Ishrin quartz aranite, Wadi Zerqa Ma’in [50]. (F) Dickite as seen at SEM in form of large “books” of stacked hexagonal dickite plates, Disi F., Lower Ordovician [14]. (G) Kurnub quartz arenite, porosity 25% - 30%. Note slight syntaxial overgrowth and the angular corroded quartz grains, Wadi Zerqa Ma’in [50]. (H) Quartz arenite, Umm Ishrin F./Upper Cambrian. Thin section shows syntaxial overgrowth of ±well rounded quartz grains and kaolinite/dickite filling the porespace, Wadi Zerqa Ma’in, x nicols. (I) Zircon displaying slight overgrowth (saw fish-like) with thin euhedral faces [47]. Interpretation: in situ-dissolution and immediate re-precipitation, grain mount photograph.

Thereby, the impact site must definitely not coincide with the reference areas; however, the impact itself does influence the motion of continental masses. In case of continents’ collision, sharp track changes would be destroyed. Concerning oceanic plates, a shorter residence time for tracks is to be expected caused by subduction.

In the following, chronostratigraphic age (Figure 5), sequence-analytical patterns (SBs, MFSs), major impacts (Figure 3(A), Figure 3(B), Figure 4(A), Figure 3(B)), and mass extinctions (Figure 15), [43] [44] [45] [46], are compiled in Figure 16. Most of the granulometric, mineralogic/chemical data relate to Amireh’s PhD-thesis [47] : Table 2 provides the granulometric data after Folk &Ward [48], architectural elements and lithofacies are based on Miall [49], (Table 3). Table 4 presents the light and heavy minerals from grain mounts [47] and Table 5 major and trace elements [47] of one arkosic/subarkosic arenite and five quartz arenite F. (see Introduction).

In order to document the mineralogical contrast versus quartz arenites to be dealt, the Lower Cambrian Saleb F. will be first characterized.

Research work carried out until now across Jordan evidence the unique character of its geologic setting as part of the Arabian Platform. The focus is directed on the similar paleogeographic framework provided throughout hundred millions of years comprising the according similar sequence-analytical patterns by cyclicity, predominantly through the early Paleozoic and lower Cretaceous.

Based on tectonic quietness and global sea level undulation, the northwestern edge of the Arabian Plate has developed a surprisingly high “sensitivity” during the interplay of marine incursions from the Tethys Seaway and the progradation of clastic braid plains/deltas fed by the Arabian/Nubian Shield what is manifold realized by even thin pelite layers partially bearing Cruziana-Ichnofacies, in most cases relating to global sea level rise [39] [40] [56] [57].

Haq’s and Al-Qahtani’s Chart of the Arabian Plate submits an excellent basis for manifold geoscientific correlations like formation boundaries with sequence-analytical patterns (SB, MFS), major impacts (rare events), mass extinctions, and even mineralogic/petrographic variations.

The Chart is also useful for representing the contradiction between “classic

diagenesis” (including intrastratal solution and hydrothermalism by increasing burial depth) and the new aspect of qualitative/quantitative reduction of the primary mineral content of source rocks by a dramatic change of “atmospheric chemistry” after a major impact [15] [16] and plume volcanism [23] [28] what finally results in quartz arenite deposits of very high maturity.

Dissolution processes under such conditions also concern ultrastable heavy minerals like tourmaline and zircon as well as common quartz all attacked by mixtures of aggressive acids (HNO₃, H₂SO₄, HF, HCl and H₂CO₃).

For contrasting the spectrum of the primary mineral content versus the final diagenetic stage, Figure 18 shows three thin sections drawn from an arkosic/ subarkosic arenite of the fluvial Saleb F. (A), a fluvial braid-plain quartz arenite of the Disi F. (B), and a subarkosic arenite of marine Silurian (C).

Generally spoken, syntaxial overgrowth of quartz is relatively low in contrast to massive dickite neoformation where the latter replaces quartz with increasing burial depth.

Quartz arenites without any marine influence lack in most cases all unstable

“heavies” (apatite^, garnet, hornblende, epidote, zoisite) in contrast to the arkosic Saleb F. and marine clastics (Silurian, marine intercalations in fluvial quartz arenites relating to pH > 7 resp. primary clay mineral conservation).

The burial history of the Phanerozoic suite of Jordan is shown in Figure 19 after Lopatin’s Time-Temperature-Index of Maturity TTI = ∑ n min n max ( Δ T n ) ( r n ) , [58]. It sets the field of dickite neoformation in SE Jordan (Mudawwara) below ~2000 m at a temperature of ~85˚C - 90˚C [14]. The Saleb F. reached the onset of hydrocarbon generation (liquid window) during the early Cretaceous.

The surprisingly high quantitative variation of “ultrastable heavies” relates to manifold changing pH, reworking, -transport, and resedimentation throughout a high complexity of architectural elements and lithofacies types under variable transport energy and “acidic sturz rain” conditions.

Roundness of quartz pebbles and grains covers a broad spectrum from very well rounded scattered pebbles in the Disi F., poorly rounded or even angular despite long transport distance and frequent intra-formational reworking. We relate these phenomena to the high acidity of both transport medium and pore water as well as to the diagenetic replacement by kaolinite/dickite neoformation.

It cannot be excluded that the fining-upward-cycles of the Disi F. and Lower Cretaceous Kurnub Gr. may indicate a cyclicity of changing atmospheric chemistry as cause of “rare events”.

Haq’s and Al-Qahtani’s chronostratigraphic charts (Early Paleozoic, Jurassic/Cretaceous) open our horizon, in connection with Price’s Major Impacts, and Rampino’s Mass Extinctions for a challenging field of highly possible correlations as follows:

Correlations throughout the Early Paleozoic (Figure 16):

Most of the lithostratigraphic boundaries of the Jordanian Platform coincide with the chronostratigraphic boundaries on the Arabian Plate.

The end of magmatism of the Pan-African Molasse-Sequence and a SB meet the Precambrian/Cambrian b. (542 Ma).

Most of the SBs and Major Impacts correlate with the lithostratigraphic resp. with the chronostratigraphic b. (542, 526.5, 514, 506, 502, 456/455.4 Ma).

Mass Extinctions meet Major Impacts on 550 Ma (~20%), 526.5 Ma (~33%), 514 Ma (~38%), 502 Ma (~32%) and an anoxic event 469 Ma = MFS (474 Ma ~15%).

Anoxic pelites (Burj F., Hiswah F.) correlate with worldwide sea level rise: MFS 506 Ma = Cm 20, 469 Ma = Cm 30, 454 Ma = Cm 040.

MFS coincide on both Jordanian Platform and the Arabian Plate.

Correlations throughout the Early Cretaceous (Kurnub Group) (Figure 17):

There appears a temporal relation between geologic/sedimentologic processes that happened in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Paraña-Event [23] in the South Atlantic (140 - 135 Ma). The latter relates to the initial outbreak of the hot spot Tristan da Cunha what obviously introduced the opening of the South Atlantic [28]. This magmatic event caused the effusion of both Paraña and Etendeka flood Basalts [23] [28].

Thus, magmatism in the Levant (i.e. Anti-Lebanon) coincides with the Jurassic/Cretaceous b. (145.5 Ma) while a hiatus (paleosols in Jordan and adjacent areas) as well as the development of the Inner Hellenic suture (ophiolites) in Greece cover the time-span 145.5 - 130 Ma comprising a SB (136.4 Ma) on the Arabian Plate.

A track point of South America was set by Price at 138 Ma (Figure 20): the first significant track change occurred on 135.1 Ma which would fix the “rare event” (birth of the hot spot), immediately followed by the effusion of both Flood Basalts above cited. Radiometric age analysis (⁴⁰AR/³⁹Ar) cover a time-span of the lava flows of 137 - 127 Ma [59]. Obviously, the hot spot remained long-lasting on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR), since recently it belongs, some 400 km east of it, to the African Plate (Figure 20). Both plates followed a northern drift component during MAR-Spreading (Figure 20): South America towards NW, South Africa towards N.

Because of temporal coincidence of the hot spot magmatism (Paraña, Etendeka), plates’ motion, and the geologic processes in the Near East, there is reason to accept a very high probability to find the cause for these processes in the compressive role of the northward moving African plate towards the Arabian and Eurasian Plate during the interval 145.5 - ~130 Ma (Figure 20).

Global mass extinctions took place around the Jurassic/Cretaceous b. (145.5 Ma: 13%, 138/137 Ma: 7%) = onset of Paraña magmatism followed by a SB (136.4 Ma) = Valanginian/Hauterivian b., another “rare event” (128 Ma: 12% and 113 Ma: 13%) coinciding with a SB = Aptian/Albian b., and finally on 90 Ma: 45% = Albian/Cenomanian b. accompanying the geologic processes (Figure 17).

While MORB-Basalts are classic tholeiites, hot spot basalts are indeed also tholeiites, however associated with alkali basalts that own higher concentrations of lithophile elements like K, Rb, P, Ti, and Light Rare-Earth-Elements [28]. Both Paraña and Etendeka Flood Basalts belong to the latter. Thus, Frisch explains the chemical difference by slower magmatic activity (magma differentiation), Price postulates a major impact what caused that the Paraña Flood Basalts contain material originating from molten continental lithosphere? Presuming that this was the most energetic “Rare Event” throughout the Phanerozoic and assuming a crater diameter of >500 km [23].

Thus, after Price, there is no other known geological process that could have caused such an abrupt direction change of plate motion which would not be imaginable by a plume.

He infers, in connection with Wilson [60], that a plume head of ~2000 km^Φ with a maximum elevation of ~2 km, cannot generate the magnitude of lateral stress required to split a super-continent what demands a more powerful mechanism. So, according to Price, Gondwana was struck by a large extraterrestrial body about 135.1 Ma ago that gave rise for both Paraña and Etendeka Flood Basalts.

Flood Basalt effusions commonly produce many 100,000 to millions km³ within less than one to a few million years spreading out over many 100,000 km², even several km³ basalt/year. The outflow occurs in cycles predominantly on ocean floor [28].

The dualistic scenario Major Impact/Hot Spot (Plume, Super Plume) provokes the question whether the tremendous output of basaltic lava and magmatic gases of plumes may induce a similar change of atmospheric chemistry like major impacts do in order to get a similar chemical influence on mineral solubility of surface clastics. Table 6 and Table 7 list up the composition of volcanic gases and magmatic gases during outbreaks on Kilauea/Hawaii and Erta-’Ale/Ethiopia [9].

If the effects of such volcanic gas mixtures and their relating acids produced by hot spots, would be comparable with those of major impacts, then the extremely high compositional maturity and the angular-corroded form of clastic quartz grains of the Lower Cretaceous Kurnub quartz arenites deposited on the Jordanian Platform would be explained herewith. Thus, the “diagenetic/atmospheric processes” would be comparable with those of the Early Paleozoic quartz arenites.

The Early Cretaceous period exhibits throughout ~45 Ma 12 MFSs and ~12

Sources: Shepherd. 1938. p. 321 (Kilauea); Giggenbach and Le Guern. 1976. p. 26 (Erta’Ale). The three Kilauea samples are Shepherd’s Nos. J8. J11. J13; the first two from Erta’Ale are representative individual samples and the third is an average of 18 samples. Shepherd calculated all chlorine as Cl₂; his numbers are expressed here as HCl, for ease of comparison with the Erta’Ale analyses. ^†May include some H₂S.

SBs indicating an average of one MFS/SB per 4 Ma. The total time comprises 6 major impacts, 4 mass extinctions and 10 - 13 marine black shale ingressions (MFSs) on the Arabian Platform [31].

Positive correlations are generally given by:

Main SBs to both formation b. and mass extinctions.

The SBs-cycles/MFSs-cycles occurred in fairly regular time-spans.

Interplay of major impacts, hot spot activity (Tristan da Cunha), beginning opening of the South Atlantic with northward motion of the African Plate, and mountain building in the collision zone of the latter with Eurasia.

Tremendous volcanic/hot spot activity along the South Atlantic Rift zone, varying global change of atmospheric chemistry caused by both major impacts and super-volcanism and accompanied by cyclic acidic “sturz rain” that had influence on the qualitative/quantitative composition of the Early Cretaceous sediments and rocks (quartz arenites) and on cyclic transport energy (regular fining upward sequences owning lag deposits).

Taking into account all results of this paper, there is to state-accepting a certain scope of analytical error—a high coincidence of the parameters applied and a high probability of more or less global influence by major impacts and super-volcanism induced change of atmospheric chemistry, plate motion and relating mountain building (i.e. Inner Hellenic Suture/Greece), mass extinction and sea level fluctuation (SBs, MFSs). Furthermore, the fining up ward cycles through the Disi F. and the Early Cretaceous F. challenges to verify the interdependence of the processes dealt with.

The results submitted in this paper allow putting, finally, some relating questions:

May cyclic fining upward sequences of quartz arenites be originated by hazardous atmospheric chemical processes (acidic “sturz rain events”) that have been initiated by so-called “rare events” like major impacts and/or plume-volcanism?

May major impacts trigger a plume/super-plume?

With regard to the fact that hot spots may produce > 20 km³ lava and gas per year which would be comparable with basalt lava effusion along Mid-Oceanic Ridges [28], is there any verified significant influence on climate change and consequences for the further course of Earth History? [Compare: 61 and 62].

Example: the Cretaceous interval 115 - 90 Ma was the warmest period since Precambrian possibly caused by an immense outflow of basaltic lava and gas produced by a super-plume (several hot spots active during the same time-span), [28] [63] : Sea level rise: up to 250 m.

By the way: in Jordan the transition zone Albian/Cenomanian reveals a continuous facies change ranging from fluvial quartz arenite to arenaceous glaucony-bearing dolostone and marly dolomite indicating by lithofacies and ichnofossils the beginning of a warmer climate in an intertidal environment (MFS K 120). K-Ar dating yields under best preservation conditions a radiometric age of the glauconies of 96.1 ± 1.1 Ma (GMU = glaucony marker unit). Hitherto, the GMU controversaries varied between Uppermost Albian and Lowermost Cenomanian [64].

According to GTS 2004 [30] [31] GMU definitely represents the Cenomanian base since the Albian/Cenomanian b. owns an age of 99.6 Ma.

- Is there a direct effect of cyclic super plume activity on cyclic MFSs/SBs by the gigantic lava outflow on ocean floor and by increasing heat flow with regard to sea level rise? (Replacement and volume increase by warming up of seawater!) (see [28] [63] ).

- Has a dramatic change of atmospheric chemistry and linked climate, caused merely by a plume/super-plume volcanism, the capacity to generate a major mass extinction like in the case of the Siberian flood basalts at the Permian/Triassic b.? (~60%) Yes, it has (see [65] [66] [67] ). Thus, without verification of crater and/or shocked fall out back the cause of mass extinction throughout the early Paleozoic remains open.

- Are the results of this paper convincing enough to follow the “95%-Confidence Line” generally accepted in Science? [68].

“HOT SPOTS” from other “BOUNDARIES”:

“And if you would tie hundred knots—the cord remains one” (Rumi, in [69] )

“Words you use for denotation of states signify only approach” (Kalabadhi in [69] )

“A scientist with an open mind, who can question the present knowledge of science, will have more of a chance of discovering a higher truth.

A Buddhist in her quest for higher understanding also has to question her present views concerning reality. The technique of understanding is to overcome views and knowledge. The way of non-attachment from views is the basic teaching of Buddhism concerning understanding.” (Thich Nhat Hanh, [70] ).

The results speak for themselves accepting the analytical error scope:

EARLY PALEOZOIC:

- Chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic b. widely coincide with sequence-analytical patterns (SBs, MFSs):

513 Ma, 501 Ma?, 488 Ma, 483 Ma, 470 Ma?, 460.9 - 455.4 Ma.

- Impact events correlate with chronostratigraphic b.:

513/514 Ma, 501/502 Ma, 526.5Ma, 460/455.4, 456 Ma

- Mass extinctions correlate with impact events:

550 Ma: 20%, 526.5 Ma: 33%, 514 Ma: 38%, 502 Ma: 32%

EARLY CRETACEOUS:

- Temporal coincidence of the Tristan da Cunha Hot Spot-Event (Paraña/Etendeka Flood B, (137 - 127 Ma)) " track change of South America (135.1 Ma) " northward drifting of the African Plate " collision with Eurasia Inner Hellenic Suture since ~140 Ma, paleosol f., and volcanism in the Levant (145.5 - 136.4 Ma).

- Global mass extinctions correlate with formation b.

145.5 Ma (13%) = J/Kb., 138/137 Ma (7%) = onset of Paraña volcanism followed by SB on the Arabian Platform, 136.4 Ma = Val./Haut. b.Impact: 128 Ma (12%), 113 Ma (13%) = SB, Apt/Alb b., 90 Ma (15%) = Alb/Cen. b.

- Correlation of SBs with Formation b. and mass extinction

- SBs/MFSs-cycles in regular time intervals, each~12 cycles through 45 Ma (one fining upward sequence ~4 Ma) on the Arabian Platform. Relate these patterns to hazardous “sturz rain” events of high acidity directed by the super plume volcanism during the opening of the South Atlantic! And therefore, comparable with the indirect effects of major impacting volcanism during the Early Paleozoic!

The high temporal coincidence of the interdisciplinary geoscientific patterns applied, make obvious that extraterrestrial and super-volcanic processes may have more influence on sedimentary rock formation as hitherto thought.

This paper comprises research work carried through the last 40 years in Jordan, finally initiated by the discovery of the impact crater Jebel Waqf as Suwwan, Jordan.

The results relate to an intensive and efficient cooperation with colleagues of the Department of Geology, Jordan University, Amman, the Natural Resources Authority (NRA) of Jordan, and the former Department of Geosciences, Braunschweig Technical University, Germany.

We are grateful for financial and technical support provided by the Deutsche For-schungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) and by the Jordan University, Amman.

The manifold sedimentologic field campaigns were mainly conducted with B.S, Amireh who received his (PhD) from Braunschweig Technical University, A.M. Abed, Fawzy Naji, H. Khoury, E. Salameh, and W. Schneider, not to forget many drivers throughout several decades.

The NRA-Colleagues contributed a mass of sedimentologic data by their mapping work and several constructive publications concerning the Early Paleozoic Sedimentology.

Our papers of the last years published in this Journal wouldn’t be written without the fascinating book of N.J. Price “Major Impacts and Plate Tectonics”. He has built an inviting bridge to us Sedimentary Geologists for developing interdisciplinary ideas and concepts.

B.U. Haq and A.M, Al-Qahtani established a Cycle Chart of the Arabian Platform that provides an excellent temporal framework and base for manifold correlations of chronostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic, sequence-analytical date, major impact events, and mass extinctions throughout the Paleozoic and Lower Cretaceous between the Arabian-Nubian Shield and the Tethys seaway.

Thus, thanks to all who cooperated with us, including many Bedouins and villagers across wide realms of Jordan in this unforgettable project touching Nature, Science, Culture, and Society of Jordan.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Schneider, W. and Salameh, E. (2020) Phanerozoic Quartz Arenite Formation and Sequence-Analytical Patterns: Indirectly Relating to Major Impacting and Super Plume Volcanism, Jordan, Arabian Plate Open Journal of Geology, 10, 13-52. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2020.101002