A bulk sample of the 0 - 15 cm depth of a soil mapped as Deerfield loamy fine sand (mixed, mesic Aquic Udipsamments) was collected, dried to constant

moisture in a forced-air oven at 40˚C, and ground to pass a 2-mm sieve. Dried soil sample was thoroughly mixed in a new cement mixer. Soil pH was measured by 1:1 soil:water [13] and soil organic matter (SOM) was measured gravimetrically by loss on ignition (LOI) [14]. Soil total C and N were measured by combustion using an Elementar Variomax instrument [15]. Soil NO₃-N and NH₄-N were extracted by 2-M KCl and measured on a Skalar auto analyzer [16]. Those two are the inorganic sources of soil N which are taken up by plants. Mehlich-3 extractable nutrients were measured by the standard procedure [17]. Relative amount of sand, silt, and clay were measured by the hydrometer method [18]. The PPBwas ground to fineness in a new coffee grinder and analyzed for pH, total C, total N, NO₃-N, and NH₄-N as described. Total P and total K were measured by standard method and converted to P₂O₅ and K₂O equivalents [19].

We amended the bulk soil sample with monocalcium phosphate ((CaH₂PO₄)₂), potassium chloride (KCl), sulfate of potash and magnesia (Sul-Po-Mag), zinc sulfate (ZnSO₄) and pelletized lime to supply the equivalent of 56, 112, 36, 48, 8.4, and 2800 kg∙ha⁻¹ of: P₂O₅, K₂O, Mg, S, Zn, and lime respectively. This ensured that N was the only soil amendment that could limit the corn yield potential.

The experimental units consisted of 24-cm diameter-7.2-liter black plastic pots. The required amount of N source for all five replications of each treatment was thoroughly mixed with the appropriate quantity of soil in a cement mixer. Then 9 kg of N-treated soil was transferred into each plastic pot and the pot was tamped three times to create a uniform soil bulk density. Five seeds of corn hybrid DEKALB “DK C67-14”, a high biomass producing hybrid, were planted in each pot on 5-July 2017 and thinned to one seedling per pot five days after germination. Greenhouse temperature was set to maintain at 24˚C. Supplemental light was provided 12 hrs∙day⁻¹ from 7:00 AM to 7:00 pm and corn was watered as needed. Corn was grown for 77 days and the experiment was terminated on 19-September 2017 when most plants had reached the silk growth stage (R-1).

At the end of the study we measured and recorded the height of each corn plant from the lowest node above the soil level to the top of the tassel and cut the total above-ground portion of each plant at 1 cm above the soil level. Plant samples were dried to constant weight in a forced-air oven and plant dry biomass was recorded. Plant samples from all five replications were ground in a Willey Mini-Mill to pass a 20-mesh sieve and analyzed for total N with combustion method. Total N uptake per plant was calculated by multiplying the whole plant biomass by its respective N concentration.

After the corn harvest we transferred the soil from each pot (selected N-treatments: 0, 90 and 180 kg total N ha⁻¹) to a clean plastic tub, removed the roots manually, mixed the soil thoroughly, and collected representative samples by the quarter method. Postharvest samples were ground to pass a 2-mm-sieve and analyzed for pH, total N, NH₄-N, NO₃-N, and SOM as described before.

We performed analysis of variance (ANOVA) to evaluate and compare the effect of N-treatment on corn growth parameters and post-harvest soil properties using the SAS software package. When appropriate, means were separated by the least significant difference (LSD) method and interpreted as significant when P ≤ 0.10.

Prior to addition of any soil amendment, the soil pH was 5.5 and SOM was 28 g∙kg⁻¹ (Table 2). Soil texture was sandy loam; sand and clay were the most and least predominant soil particles respectively. Soil inorganic N was 13.2 mg∙kg⁻¹ and NH₄-N was the predominant form. Mehlich-3 extractable K was 28 mg/kg indicating the need for supplemental K fertilization.

The PPB had a pH 7.7 which is within the range of values reported by Price et al. (2009) [5] and Ziadi et al. (2013) [6]. Carbon and N concentrations were 379 and 14 g∙kg⁻¹ respectively and C:N ratio was 27.2 (Table 3). The C and N concentrations of 276 and 3 mg∙kg⁻¹ and C:N ratio of 92 respectively have been reported by others [5]. The C and N concentrations of 329 - 438, 10.5 - 315 mg∙kg⁻¹ and C:N of 14 - 31 for two secondary treated PPB have been reported [6].

Nitrate-N was below the detection limit and NH₄-N was very low (0.18 g∙kg⁻¹) indicating that organic N was the predominant source of N. Therefore, N mineralization/immobilization is expected to be the key determinant of the N fertilizer value of PPB. The PPB contained several plant essential nutrients including

(P) and potassium (K), thus it is a potential low grade and high organic matter source of those two nutrients.

Nitrogen treatment did not significantly influence (P ≥ 0.1) plant height which numerically ranged 175 - 183 cm (Table 4). However, it significantly (P < 0.0001) affected corn dry biomass, N concentration, and N uptake. Corn dry biomass ranged 26.9 - 41.1 g∙plant⁻¹. Dry biomass of corn that did not receive any N was 38.3 g∙plant⁻¹and was not significantly different than urea-N treated corn (38.1 - 40.9 g∙plant⁻¹) or corn treated with 90 kg PPB-N ha⁻¹. Application of 180 kg∙ha⁻¹ of PPB-N produced the significantly smallest plant biomass (26.9 g∙plant⁻¹). Application of ≥135 kg PPB-N ha⁻¹ significantly reduced the corn dry biomass as compared to lower rates of PPB, 0-N, or urea-N treatments. There was a trend of decreasing plant biomass with increasing PPB rate. This is consistent with Gagnon et al. (2012) [20] who reported corn dry biomass of 9.7, and 14 Mg∙ha⁻¹ for plants that received 150 kg N ha⁻¹ from PB and mineral fertilizer respectively. It is also similar to the effect of a deinking PB, where increasing the PB application rate decreased the dry biomass of perennial ryegrass (Lolium Perrenne) (Simard et al., 1998) [21]. However, N’Dayegamiye et al. (2003) [22] reported that application of 3.2 Mg∙ha⁻¹ (dry weight) PB, with C:N ratio of 14, significantly increased corn dry biomass as compared to 0 N control. In our study corn amended with high PPB rates exhibited visual symptoms consistent with N deficiency (yellowing of the lower leaves). The difference between our results and theirs can be attributed to the wider C:N ratio of the PPB we used (14 vs. 27.2). We believe that the wide C:N ratio (27.2) of our PPB

^zmeans followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P value = 0.10.

promoted immobilization of soil and PPB-N. Several researchers have noted that application of PB with C:N ratio > 30 can result in microbial sequestration of N in soil [7] [23] [24]. Some other researchers, have noted a critical C:N ratio of 12 - 30 [12]. Our data indicates that N immobilization occurred at the C:N ratio of 27.2.

From a beneficial use perspective, the C/N ratio of the PPB can be reduced by incorporating inorganic N (from a nitrogen fertilizer) into the pellets. This approach have been tested by several researchers with generally successful outcomes [25] [26] [27].

Nitrogen concentration in corn ranged 6.2 - 11.5 g∙kg⁻¹ and there was no significant difference in N concentration between plants that did not received any N (8.7 g∙kg⁻¹) and plants fertilized with 45 or 90 kg urea-N ha⁻¹ (9.5 - 10.2 g∙kg⁻¹). However, PPB application significantly reduced corn N concentration as compared with the corn that did not receive any N (6.2 - 6.7 vs 8.7 g∙kg⁻¹). On average the application of PPB reduced the corn N concentration by 26% as compared to the corn that did not receive any N. At any given N application rate, the N concentration of urea-N treated corn was significantly more than PPB-N treated corn. Increasing PPB application rate often numerically albeit not significantly reduced corn N concentration. This is in agreement with Simmard et al. [21] who reported that increasing PB application rate decreased N concentration in barley grain and straw. Similar results were reported by Feagly et al. (1994) [28] and Douglass et al. (2003) [29]. The trend in our corn N concentration indicates N immobilization by PPB application.

Total N uptake (removed from soil) by the corn plant reflected corn dry biomass and N concentration. Total N uptake by corn that did not receive any N and corn fertilized with urea-N or PPB-N were 327, 166 - 278, and 379 - 455 mg∙plant⁻¹ respectively. This is in agreement with Gagnon et al. (2012) [20] who noted that N uptake by silage corn fertilized with 150 kg inorganic N ha⁻¹ was significantly more than corn that received the same amount of total N from a PB with C:N ratio of 50. Nitrogen uptake by any urea treated corn was significantly more than corn treated with any PPB. There was no significant difference in N uptake among the plants that did not receive any N and those fertilized with 45 or 90 kg urea-N ha⁻¹. Plants treated with 180 kg∙ha⁻¹ urea-N were very dark green, a symptom consistent with excessive N uptake.

Nitrogen treatment did not significantly influence the soil pH (P > 0.1, Table 5), but significantly (P < 0.0001) influenced SOM which ranged 18.5 - 19.7 g∙kg⁻¹. The SOM of the treatments that received 90 and 180 kg PPB-N ha⁻¹ were 19.7 and 19.4 g∙kg⁻¹ respectively and were significantly higher than soil that did not receive any N (SOM = 18.5 g∙kg⁻¹). This is a small increase in SOM, however the amount of PPB applied at those two rates (Table 1) was ≤8480 kg∙ha⁻¹ which is considered a low rate. The observed increase in SOM, brought about by PPB, points to the potential soil health benefits of beneficial use of higher rates of PPB, provided that its C:N ratio can be reduced to control N-immobilization. Nitrogen treatment significantly (P < 0.0001) influenced soil total C and N. Total C in the soil that did not receive any N was 23.6 g∙kg⁻¹ and that of the soil treated with 180 kg N ha⁻¹ by urea or PPB were 33.4 and 36.0 g∙kg⁻¹ respectively. The increase in soil C is consistent with Rotenberg et al. (2005) [30] where application of secondary PB increased soil organic C. Similar to the increase in SOM, amending soil with PPB is a potential means of C sequestration and thus it is environmentally appealing.

^zmeans followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P value = 0.10.

Total N in post-harvest soil samples ranged 1.1 - 2.1 g∙kg⁻¹ where the highest and lowest total N were measured in soil that did not receive any N and soil treated with 180 kg∙ha⁻¹ of PPB-N respectively. The inorganic forms of N (NH₄-N and NO₃-N) were significantly (P < 0.0001) affected by N-treatment. Nitrate-N was the predominant form of soil inorganic N (1.6 - 20.2 mg NO₃-N kg⁻¹) as compared to NH₄-N (0.18 - 2.29 mg NH₄-N kg⁻¹). Soil NH₄-N was highest in soil that was treated with 180 kg∙ha⁻¹ urea-N perhaps as a result of hydrolysis of urea in soil. Nitrate-N concentration was highest in the urea treated soil (14.6 - 20.2 mg NO₃-N kg⁻¹), lowest in soil treated with PPB (1.6 - 2 mg NO₃-N kg⁻¹), and that of soil that did not receive any N was 6.7 mg∙kg⁻¹. The low concentration of NO₃-N in PPB treated soil is another indicator of microbial sequestration of PPB-N.