<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2020.101001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-96414</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Supplemental Calcium Levels on Feedlot Growth Performance and Dietary Net Energy Utilization during the Receiving Feeding Period of Calf-Fed Holstein Steers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>L.</surname><given-names>Buenabad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B.</surname><given-names>C. Latack</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>A. Zinn</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto de Ciencias Agrícolas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>University of California Cooperative Extension, Holtville, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Ninety-six calf-fed Holstein steer (127 kg) were used to evaluate the influence of supplemental dietary calcium (Ca) on growth-performance, and dietary net energy (NE) utilization during the initial 112-d of receiving period. Treatments consisted of steam flake corn-based growing-finishing diets supplemented with limestone to achieve 0.60%, 0.70%, 0.80%, or 0.90% dietary Ca (DM basis). Morbidity was low (6.3%) and it was not affected (P &gt; 0.87) by dietary treatments. During the initial 84-d period (181 kg average BW), increasing dietary Ca did not influence (P &gt; 0.10) DMI, ADG, gain efficiency or observed/expected DMI. Observed DMI was 19% greater than expected based on diet formulation and growth. Estimated metabolizable protein and methionine supply during the initial 84-d period averaged 92% and 79% of the required, respectively. The apparent decrease in efficiency of energy utilization in the present study is in close agreement with previous studies involving calf-fed Holstein steers in the early growing phase fed conventional growing-finishing diet that is otherwise deficient in metabolizable amino acids. Thus, it is considered that the anticipated growth-performance responses to dietary Ca treatments may have been masked by expected inefficiencies due to metabolizable amino acid deficiency. During the final 28-d period (256 kg of average BW), increasing supplemental Ca reduced feed intake (linear effect, P = 0.04) and enhanced gain efficiency (linear effect, P = 0.03). During this period, predicted ([1] Level 1) metabolizable protein and methionine supply were 110% and 94% of the required, respectively. Nevertheless, improvements in gain efficiency during the final 28-d period with increasing levels of supplemental Ca were not sufficient to influence (P &gt; 0.10) overall 112-d growth-performance. It is concluded dietary Ca requirements of calf-fed Holstein steers during the initial 112-d feeding period appear to be secondary to deficiencies of conventional steam-flaked corn-based diets in meeting metabolizable amino acid requirements. However, when those requirements are met during the early growing phase, gain efficiency responses are optimized at approximately 0.90% dietary Ca.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Holstein</kwd><kwd> Feedlot</kwd><kwd> Performance</kwd><kwd> Calcium</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The effect of supplemental Ca on feedlot growth-performance of yearling cattle has been inconsistent. In some instances, dietary levels over a wide range (0.3% to 1.8%) did not affect performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref4">4</xref>]. However, in other trials, dietary Ca levels greater than 0.7% enhanced ADG and gain efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref6">6</xref>]. Studies evaluating the calcium (Ca) requirements of calf-fed Holstein steers have not been previously reported. Calf-fed Holstein steers are typically fed a single diet formulation throughout the entirety of the feedlot growing-finishing period. Based on factorially estimated Ca requirements for maintenance and gain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref1">1</xref>], the average Ca requirement for the 310 to 340-d feedlot period in Holstein steers fed a steam flaked corn-based diet is 0.57% of diet DM. However, due to their comparatively high potential for growth, the factorially derived average Ca requirement during the initial growing phase (initial 112 d on feed) is much greater (≈0.90% of diet DM). Gain efficiency (ADG/DMI) of calf-fed Holstein steers during this initial 112-d period is typically less than 87.5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref8">8</xref>] of expected based on diet energy density and DMI. The basis of the inefficiencies on dietary NE utilization is not clear but seems to be the result of several factors involved such as metabolizable amino acids supply [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref9">9</xref>] or dietary Ca level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref6">6</xref>]. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the influence of dietary calcium level on growth-performance of calf-fed Holstein steers fed a conventional steam flaked corn-based diet during the initial 112 d on feed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Animal care and handling techniques were approved by the University of California Animal Care and Use Committee.</p>Feedlot Growth Performance<p>Ninety-six calf-fed Holstein steer (127 &#177; 8 kg) were used to evaluate the effect of Ca supplementation on initial 112-d feedlot growth-performance, and dietary energetics. Treatments consisted of steam-flaked corn-based growing-finishing diets supplemented to provide 0.60%, 0.70%, 0.80%, or 0.90% Ca (DM basis). Dietary treatments evaluated in this study were formulated to provide 100%, 115%, 131% or 146% of Ca requirements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref10">10</xref>]. Calves originating from Tulare, California were received at the University of California Desert Research Center, Holtville, CA on January 23, 2018. Upon arrival, calves were vaccinated for IBR, BVD, PI<sub>3</sub>, and BRSV (Bovi-shield<sup>&#210;</sup> Gold One Shot, Zoetis Animal Health, New York, NY), clostridials (Ultrabac<sup>&#210;</sup> 7, Zoetis Animal Health, New York, NY), treated for parasites (Dectomax<sup>&#210;</sup> Injectable, Zoetis Animal Health, New York, NY), and injected with 500,000 IU vitamin A (Vital EA-D, Stuart Products, Amarillo, TX). Steers were allowed ad libitum access to water and dietary treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Fresh feed was provided twice daily. Weight gain was based on initial off-truck shrunk weight and 112-d final weight reduced 4% to adjust for digestive tract fill. Energy gain (EG, Mcal/d) was calculated by the equation:</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of experimental diets (% DMB)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Calcium supplementation level<sup>1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Item</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Ingredient, % DM</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudangrass hay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tallow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molasses, cane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distillers Grain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Steam flaked corn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limestone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dicalcium phosphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium oxide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rumensin 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0165</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Nutrient composition, DM basis (tabular values, NRC, 1996)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DRY MATTER, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEm, Mcal/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEg, Mcal/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rumen DIP, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rumen UIP, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ether extract, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nonstructural CHO, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NDF, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfur, %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>EG = 0.0557 W 0.75 &#215; ADG 1.097 , (1)</p><p>where EG is the daily deposited energy, and W is the body weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref11">11</xref>]. Maintenance energy (EM, Mcal/d) was calculated by the equation:</p><p>EM = 0.086 W 0.75 (2)</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref14">14</xref>]. From the derived estimates of energy required for maintenance and gain, the NE<sub>m</sub> and NE<sub>g</sub> values of the diet were obtained using the quadratic formula:</p><p>x = ( − b − b 2 − 4 a c ) / 2 c , (3)</p><p>where x = diet NE<sub>m</sub>, Mcal/kg,</p><p>a = − 0.41 EM , (4)</p><p>b = 0.877 EM + 0.41 DMI + EG , (5)</p><p>c = − 0.877 DMI , (6)</p><p>and</p><p>NE g = 0.877 NE m − 0.41 (7)</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref15">15</xref>]. Expected DMI (expDMI) was estimated accordingly:</p><p>exp DMI = ( 0.0557 W 0.75 &#215; ADG 1.097 / tNE g ) + ( 0.086 W 0.75 / tNE m ) , (8)</p><p>where tNE<sub>m</sub> and tNE<sub>g</sub> are tabular NE values of the diet based on formulation ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref1">1</xref>]; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The trial was analyzed as a randomized complete block design experiment, considering initial shrunk weight groupings for blocks, and pen as experimental unit (Statistix 10, Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL), according to the following statistical model:</p><p>Y i j = μ + B i + T j + ε i j , (9)</p><p>where μ is the common experimental effect, B<sub>i</sub> represents initial weight block effect, T<sub>j</sub> represents dietary treatment effect, and ε<sub>ij</sub> represents the residual error. Treatment effects were evaluated by means of orthogonal polynomials.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Observed dietary calcium levels were 91%, 93%, 98% and 112% of expected based on diet formulation and tabular values for feed ingredients ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref10">10</xref>]; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) for the 0.60%, 0.70%, 0.80% and 0.90% Ca treatments, respectively.</p><p>The vast majority (98% to 99%) of empty body Ca is located in bone tissue, the remaining distributed in extracellular fluids and soft tissues where it plays basic physiological roles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref19">19</xref>]. Studies with young calves between 30 and 180 days indicate that body Ca concentration increases 3-fold (from 0.015 to 0.044 g/d per kg BW; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref20">20</xref>]). Another study observed that empty body Ca content is influenced by the rate of gain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref21">21</xref>]. In growing bulls from 200 to 350 kg, increasing rate of gain from 0.9 to 1.2 kg/d decreased empty body Ca from 15.0 to 12.7 g/kg empty body weight (reflecting differences rate of growth effects on bone:lean ratio). Current estimates of Ca requirements for maintenance (0.0154 g/kg BW) and growth (0.07 g/kg protein gain) were established by converting estimated absolute Ca requirements to dietary Ca assuming a 50% true absorption of dietary Ca [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref17">17</xref>]. However, there have been no rigorous attempts to define the calcium requirements of cattle based on growth performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref18">18</xref>], and those available are not sufficiently consistent to justify specified factorial allowances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Treatment effects on growth-performance of calf-fed Holstein steers are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Morbidity during the study was low, averaging 6%, and was</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Influence of Ca level on growth-performance and dietary energetics of calf-fed Holstein steers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Dietary Ca, %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Expected Ca level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linear</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quadratic</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyzed Ca level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.555 &#177; 0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.654 &#177; 0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.786 &#177; 0.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.010 &#177; 0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Days on Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pen replicates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >1 - 84 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADG, kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMI, kg/d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain:Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Dietary NE, Mcal/kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintenance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Observed/expected DMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >85 - 112 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADG, kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMI, kg/d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain:Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Dietary NE, Mcal/kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintenance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Observed/expected DMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >1 - 112 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight, kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADG, kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DMI, g/d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain:Feed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Dietary NE, Mcal/kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintenance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Observed/expected DMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>not affected (P &gt; 0.87) by dietary treatments. During the initial 84-d period (181 kg average BW), increasing dietary Ca did not influence (P &gt; 0.10) DMI, ADG, gain efficiency or observed/expected DMI. Observed DMI was 19% greater than expected based on diet formulation and growth. The ratio of observed/expected dietary NE is a sensitive indicator of metabolizable amino acids deficiencies, particularly methionine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref22">22</xref>]. The observed decrease in efficiency of energy utilization in the present study is in close agreement with previous studies involving calf-fed Holstein steers in the early growing phase fed conventional growing-finishing diet that is otherwise deficient in metabolizable amino acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref24">24</xref>]. In these studies, between 91% and 95% of the variation in observed vs. expected DMI was explained by limiting metabolizable amino acid supply. In the present study, estimated metabolizable protein and methionine supply during the initial 84-period averaged 92% and 79% of required, respectively. Thus, it is considered that the anticipated growth-performance responses to dietary Ca treatments may have been masked by expected inefficiencies due to metabolizable amino acid deficiency.</p><p>During the final 28-d period (256 kg of average BW), increasing supplemental Ca reduced DMI (linear effect, P = 0.04; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and enhanced gain efficiency (linear effect, P = 0.03; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). These improvements were reflected in an 8% enhancement (linear effect, P = 0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) in estimated efficiency of energy utilization. During this period predicted ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref1">1</xref>] Level 1) metabolizable protein and methionine supply were 110% and 94% of required, respectively. Nevertheless, improvements in gain efficiency during the last 28-d period with increasing levels of supplemental Ca were not sufficient to influence (P &gt; 0.10) overall 112-d growth-performance.</p><p>There were no treatment effects (P &gt; 0.10) on ADG. Although, even at the lowest dietary Ca level (0.60%), overall (112-d) ADG averaged 1.34 kg/d, 7%</p><p>greater than projected based on the generalized equation for non-implanted calf-fed Holstein steers (1.24 kg/d; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96414-ref25">25</xref>]).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Implications</title><p>Dietary Ca requirements of calf-fed Holstein steers during the initial 112-d feeding period appear to be secondary to deficiencies of conventional steam-flaked corn-based diets in meeting metabolizable amino acid requirements. However, when those requirements are met during the early growing phase, gain efficiency responses are optimized at approximately 0.90% dietary Ca.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This project was supported through University of California Agricultural Experiment Station with Hatch funding from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (CA-D-ASC-6578-H).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Buenabad, L., Latack, B.C. and Zinn, R.A. (2020) Effect of Supplemental Calcium Levels on Feedlot Growth Performance and Dietary Net Energy Utilization during the Receiving Feeding Period of Calf-Fed Holstein Steers. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.101001</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96414-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (2000) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th Update Edition. The National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Russell, J.R., Young, A.W. and Jorgensen, N.A. (1980) Effect of Sodium Bicarbonate and Limestone Addition to High Grain Diets on Feedlot Performance and Ruminal and Fecal Parameters in Finishing Steers. Journal of Animal Science, 51, 996-1002. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1980.514996x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huntington, G.B. (1983) Feedlot Performance, Blood Metabolic Profile and Calcium Status of Steers Fed High Concentrated Diets Containing Several Levels of Calcium. Journal of Animal Science, 56, 1003-1011. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.5651003x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinn, R.A. and Shen, Y. (1996) Interaction of Dietary Calcium and Supplemental Fat on Digestive Function and Growth Performance in Feedlot Steers. Journal of Animal Science, 74, 2303-2309. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.74102303x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinn, R.A., Shen, Y., Barajas, R., Monta&amp;#241;o, M., Alvarez, E. and Ramirez, E. (1997) Effects of Dietary Calcium Levels on Growth-Performance and Digestive Function in Cattle Fed a High-Fat Finishing Diet. Proceedings, 48, 181.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plascencia, A., Alvarez, E.G., Monta&amp;#241;o, M., Salinas-Chavira, J. and Zinn, R.A. (2009) Effects of Dietary Calcium Levels on Growth-Performance and Digestive Function in Cattle Fed a High-Fat Finishing Diet. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 36, 179-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2009.9707055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinn, R.A., Calderon, J.F., Corona, L., Plascencia, A., Monta&amp;#241;o, M.F. and Torrentera, N. (2007) Phase Feeding Strategies to Meet Metabolizable Amino Acids Requirements of Calf-Fed Holstein Steer. The Professional Animal Scientist, 23, 336-339. https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30986-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montano, M.F., Plascencia, A., Salinas-Chavira, J., Torrentera, N. and Zinn, R.A. (2017) Influence of Level and Form of Supplemental Zinc on Feedlot Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Calf-Fed Holstein Steers. The Professional Animal Scientist, 33, 651-658. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2017-01640</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klemesrud, M.J., Klopfenstein, T.J., Stock, R.A., Lewis, A.J. and Herold, D.W. (2000) Effect of Dietary Concentration of Metabolizable Lysine on Finishing Cattle Performance. Journal of Animal Science, 78, 1060-1066. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7841060x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (1996) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle, 7th Edition, The National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (1984) Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 6th Edition, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garrett, W. (1971) Energy Efficiency of Beef and Dairy Steers. Journal of Animal Science, 31, 452-456. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1971.323451x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (1988) Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 6th Revised Edition, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fox, D.G. and Black, J.R. (1984) A System for Predicting Body Composition and Performance of Growing Cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 58, 725-739. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.583725x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinn, R.A. and Shen, Y. (1998) An Evaluation of Ruminally Degradable Intake Protein and Metabolizable Amino Acid Requirements of Feedlot Calves. Journal of Animal Science, 76, 1280-1289. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651280x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hunt, S.M. and Groff, J.L. (1990) Advanced Nutrition and Human Metabolism. West Publishing Company, St. Paul, MN, 226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edition, National Academy of Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suttle, N.F. (2010) Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 4th Edition, CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845934729.0000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watson, A.K., Hales, K.E., Hersom, M.J., Horn, G.W., Wagner, J.J., Krehbiel, C.R., McCurdy, M.P. and Erickson, G.E. (2018) Mineral Retention of Growing and Finishing Beef Cattle Across Different Production Systems. The Professional Animal Scientist, 34, 250-260. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2017-01672</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hansard, S.L., Comar, C.L. and Plumlee, M.P. (1954) The Effect of Age Upon Calcium Utilization and Maintenance Requirements in the Bovine. Journal of Animal Science, 13, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1954.13125x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwarz, F.J., Heindl, U. and Kirchgessner, M. (1995) Contents and Deposition of Major Minerals in Tissues and in the Whole Bodies of Growing Young Bulls German Simmental Breed. Arch Fur Tierernaehrung, 48, 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450399509381839</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zinn, R.A. and Owens, F.N. (1993) Ruminal Escape Protein for Lightweight Feedlot Calves. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 1677-1687. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7171677x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montano, M.F., Tejada, W., Salinas, J. and Zinn, R.A. (2016) Metabolizable Amino Acid Requirements of Feedlot Calves. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 6, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2016.62019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torrentera, N., Carrasco, R., Salinas-Chavira, J., Plascencia, A. and Zinn, R.A. (2017) Influence of Methionine Supplementation of Growing Diets Enriched with Lysine on Feedlot Performance and Characteristics of Digestion in Holstein Steer Calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 30, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96414-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torrentera, N., Barreras, A., Gonzalez, V., Plascencia, A., Salinas, J. and Zinn, R.A. (2016) Delay Implant Strategy in Calf-Fed Holstein Steers: Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45, 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1210012</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>