<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-6795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjnst.2020.101001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST-96306</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Elastic Cross Sections for &lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;He + &lt;sup&gt;58&lt;/sup&gt;Ni above the Coulomb Barrier
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Arceo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>Pedraza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luis</surname><given-names>M. Sandoval</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>L.</surname><given-names>A. López</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>C.</surname><given-names>Álvarez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>F.</surname><given-names>Hueyotl-Zahuantitla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ariel</surname><given-names>Flores-Rosas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Luis Raya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jesús</surname><given-names>Martínez-Castro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>CONACYT, México City, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Universidad Politécnica de Pachuca, Pachuca, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facultad de Ciencias en Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Area Académica de Matemáticas y Física, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Centro de Investigación en Computación, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México City, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this work, the elastic cross section is calculated at energies above the Coulomb barrier for 
  <sup>3</sup>He + 
  <sup>58</sup>Ni using a Woods-Saxon potential. The solutions of the radial Schr
  &amp;ouml;dinger equations are calculated numerically and they are introduced in the 
  <em>S</em> matrix, after which the cross section is obtained. The parameters in the potential are adjusted to satisfy known experimental data.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Elastic and Inelastic Scattering</kwd><kwd> Scattering Theory</kwd><kwd> Total Cross Sections</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>We have studied the scattering of nuclei by helium and nickel atoms using the Schr&#246;dinger equation at energies up to 35 MeV for the reaction <sup>3</sup>He + <sup>58</sup>Ni using a radial Woods-Saxon potential. We treated the Schr&#246;dinger equation numerically, for the case of the Woods-Saxon potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref1">1</xref>] ; the parameters for this potential were adjusted to coincide with known experimental data.</p><p>The value of chi-squared was minimized by using a theoretical model and the experimental data from Fujisawa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>]. The parameters thus obtained are used in the Woods-Saxon potential and we compare the results with known experimental data.</p><p>Recently we have results at low energies for the reaction <sup>3,4,6He</sup> + <sup>58</sup>Ni [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref5">5</xref>]. We compare our results for this reaction and show that the Woods-Saxon potential agrees with known experimental data.</p><p>This paper is divided into four sections as follows. In Section 2, we briefly describe the setup; Section 2.1 is dedicated to obtaining the Woods-Saxon potential. In Section 2.2, we discuss the elastic cross section for the scattering of helium by nickel atoms. In Section 3, the obtained results are shown. Finally, in Section 4 we focus on the discussion of our results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Theory</title><p>In this section we describe the procedure used to compute the Woods-Saxon potential produced by a point particle. We then calculate the cross section for the collision of two particles of mass m 1,2 and atomic number Z 1,2 . Our approach to this problem is numerical, and we make the assumption that the interaction of the incident particle with the rest atom can be accounted for by the effective Woods-Saxon potential which we calculate below. We minimize the value of chi squared from the experimental <sup>3</sup>He + <sup>58</sup>Ni data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>] and the parameters we obtain are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Woods-Saxon Potential</title><p>The Woods-Saxon potential is a mean field potential for the nucleons (protons and neutrons) inside the atomic nucleus, which is used to describe approximately the forces applied on each nucleon, in the nuclear shell model for the structure of the nucleus.</p><p>The standard Woods-Saxon potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref1">1</xref>], as a function of the distance r * from the nuclear center, is defined by:</p><p>V ′ ( r * ) = − V 0 1 + exp ( r * − R a ) , a ≪ R (1)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Parameters obtained for the reaction <sup>3</sup>He + <sup>58</sup>Ni</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >E</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >l</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ R</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ 2 / N</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >up to</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1476.904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2871.663</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1526.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3542.422</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174.500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1620.872</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2695.711</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Parameters obtained with the derivative in the complex term of the Woods-Saxon potential for the reaction <sup>3</sup>He + <sup>58</sup>Ni</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >E</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >l</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W 0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >σ T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ 2 / N</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >up to</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(fm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3277.768</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.903</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3046.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.047</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2804.289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.832</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>where V 0 (with dimensions of energy, MeV) represents the potential well depth, a is a length representing the “surface thickness” of the nucleus, and R = r 0 A 1 / 3 is the nuclear radius where r 0 = 1.25   fm and A is the atomic mass number.</p><p>It is interesting to examine the consequences of the radial effective Woods-Saxon potential, V W S ( r * ) , by using both real and imaginary terms in experiments such as scattering events. We do so in the following section, where we include the Coulomb interaction potential V C ( r ) . The total radial effective potential used is</p><p>V ( r ) = V C ( r ) + V W S ( r * ) , (2)</p><p>V ( r ) = 1.44 Z 1 , 2 r − V 0 1 + exp ( r * − R 1 a 1 ) − i W 0 1 + exp ( r * − R 2 a 2 ) . (3)</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, we show the real and imaginary parts of the Woods-Saxon potential.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Schr&#246;dinger Equation with the Woods-Saxon Potential</title><p>In this section we solve the radial Schr&#246;dinger equation using the radial potential (Equation (3)). The Schr&#246;dinger equation is,</p><p>[ − ℏ 2 2 μ ∇ 2 + V ( r ) ] Ψ ( r ) = E Ψ ( r ) , (4)</p><p>where μ = m 1 m 2 m 1 + m 2 is the reduced mass for a two-particle system, E is the</p><p>energy and V ( r ) is the radial effective potential calculated in the previous section.</p><p>We introduce U ( r ) , where</p><p>Ψ ( r ) = Ψ ( r ) = U ( r ) r , (5)</p><p>and the Schr&#246;dinger Equation (4) is solved by the method of separation of variables. For the radial component we obtain</p><p>U ″ l ( r ) + 2 μ ℏ 2 [ E − V ( r ) ] U l ( r ) − l ( l + 1 ) r 2 U l ( r ) = 0. (6)</p><p>The radial equation takes the final form,</p><p>U ″ l ( r ) + 2 μ ℏ 2 [ E − 1.44 Z 1,2 r + V 0 1 + exp ( r * − R 1 a 1 ) + i W 0 1 + exp ( r * − R 2 a 2 ) ] U l ( r ) − l ( l + 1 ) r 2 U l ( r ) = 0. (7)</p><p>The next step is to determine the set of the parameters for the Woods-Saxon potential. In the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref> we show the parameters obtained by minimizing the chi squared value,</p><p>χ 2 = ∑ i = 1 N [ σ t h ( θ i ) − σ e x p ( θ i ) Δ σ e x p ( θ i ) ] 2 . (8)</p><p>The calculations for this analysis were done using the experimental data from Fujisawa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref> we show the parameters obtained by minimizing chi squared and using the experimental data from Fujisawa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>The numerical techniques necessary to solve the Schr&#246;dinger equation with a radial potential are explained in chapter 3, Equation (3.28) of Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref6">6</xref>]. The solutions of U l from Equation (7) are introduced in the S matrix (Eq. 10.58 of Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref6">6</xref>] ), which is,</p><p>S l = U l ( r n − 1 ) r n h l − ( k r n ) − U l ( r n ) r n − 1 h l − ( k r n − 1 ) U l ( r n ) r n − 1 h l + ( k r n − 1 ) − U l ( r n − 1 ) r n h l + ( k r n ) , (9)</p><p>where the S matrix is evaluated in the last two points on a mesh of size δ ( r = 0 , δ , 2 δ , ⋯ , n δ ). U l are the solutions to the Schr&#246;dinger equation with the potential previously calculated and h l are the spherical Hankel functions defined in Eq. 10.52 of Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref6">6</xref>]. The scattering amplitude for a partial wave decomposition in terms of the S matrix is,</p><p>f ( θ ) = 1 2 i k ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( 2 l + 1 ) P l ( cos θ ) ( S l − 1 ) . (10)</p><p>For states with well defined spin and isospin the elastic and total cross section of nucleon-nucleon scattering into a solid angle element d Ω is given by the scattering amplitude f ( θ ) of the reaction</p><p>d σ d Ω = | f ( θ ) | 2 , (11)</p><p>σ T = 4 π k I m [ f ( 0 ∘ ) ] , (12)</p><p>where k is the center-of-mass momentum and f ( 0 ∘ ) is the forward amplitude.</p><p>The reaction cross section is defined as the subtraction from the integral of the elastic cross section from the total cross section,</p><p>σ R ≡ 2 π k 2 ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( 2 l + 1 ) R e ( 1 − S l ) − ∫ σ ( θ ) d Ω     . (13)</p><p>Doing the integration gives</p><p>σ R = 2 π k 2 ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( 2 l + 1 ) R e ( 1 − S l ) − π k 2 ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( 2 l + 1 ) [ | S l | 2 + 1 − 2 R e S l ] , (14)</p><p>σ R = π k 2 ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( 2 l + 1 ) ( 1 − | S l | 2 ) . (15)</p><p>The results from the calculations are shown in the next section.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Elastic Cross Section</title><p>With the analysis performed, we proceed to evaluate numerically the Equations (11)-(12) and (15). We compare the theoretical results with experimental data for elastic cross sections for elastic scattering of helium by nickel atoms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>]. This comparison is made explicitly in Figures 2-5.</p><p>In Figures 2-4 the elastic cross section is analyzed for helium by nickel atoms. We evaluate the elastic cross section at energies from T<sub>Lab</sub> = 24.15, 27.64 and 34.14 MeV considering the radial effective Woods-Saxon potential and setting the parameters to adjust the experimental points (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>).</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> we show the differential cross section at energies above the Coulomb barrier.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the total and reaction cross section for the interaction of helium by nickel atoms. We evaluate the cross sections at energies up to T L a b = 35   MeV considering the radial effective Woods-Saxon potential and setting the parameters to adjust the experimental points (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this work, we present a numerical solution of the radial Schr&#246;dinger equation using a Woods-Saxon potential. We have examined the scattering of helium atoms via nickel. The scattered from alpha particles via nickel atoms was performed and the use of an imaginary term in the Woods-Saxon potential gives a better fit to the experimental data. The parameters for the Woods-Saxon potential were varied until χ 2 was minimized and they are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>. The values obtained are better in comparison to those of the Colorado group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>I-a from Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>] ) at the energies of 24.15, 27.64 and 34.14 MeV.</p><p>Finally, the total cross section and integrated elastic scattering cross section are calculated and compared with experimental data. We obtain excellent agreement with the experimental data of Fujisawa et al. (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96306-ref2">2</xref>] ) for the set of parameters obtained in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was partially supported by FCFM-UNACH. R. Arceo acknowledges the support of the PFCE 2018.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Arceo, R., Pedraza, O., Sandoval, L.M., L&#243;pez, L.A., &#193;lvarez, C., Hueyotl-Zahuantitla, F., Flores-Rosas, A., Raya, G.L. and Mart&#237;nez-Castro, J. (2020) Elastic Cross Sections for <sup>3</sup>He + <sup>58</sup>Ni above the Coulomb Barrier. World Journal of Nu- clear Science and Technology, 10, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2020.101001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96306-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woods, R.D. and Saxon, D.S. (1954) Diffuse Surface Optical Model for Nucleon-Nuclei Scattering. Physical Review, 95, 577-578. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.577</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96306-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujisawa, T., Kamitsubo, H., Wada, T. and Igarashi, M. (1969) Optical-Model Analysis of Elastic Scattering of &lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;He Particles from &lt;sup&gt;58&lt;/sup&gt;Ni at 24.15, 27.64 and 34.14 MeV. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 27, 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.27.278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96306-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jansen, R.H.J., de Heer, F.J., Luyken, H.J., van Wingerden, B. and Blaauw, H.J. (1976) Absolute Differential Cross Sections for Elastic Scattering of Electrons by Helium, Neon, Argon and Molecular Nitrogen. Journal of Physics B, 9, 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/9/2/009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96306-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baron, N., Leonard, R.F. and Stewart, W.M. (1971) Alpha-Gamma Angular Correlations in &lt;sup&gt;12&lt;/sup&gt;C, &lt;sup&gt;24&lt;/sup&gt;Mg, &lt;sup&gt;58&lt;/sup&gt;Ni, and &lt;sup&gt;120&lt;/sup&gt;Sn. Physical Review C, 4, 1159-1173. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.4.1159</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96306-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albinski, J., Budzanowski, A., Dabrowski, H., Rogalska, Z., Wiktor, S., Rebel, H., Srivastava, D.K., Alderliesten, C., Bojowald, J., Oelert, W., Mayer-B &amp;ouml;ricke, C. and Turek, P. (1985) &amp;alpha;-Particle Scattering from Ni Isotopes at E&lt;sub&gt;&amp;alpha;&lt;/sub&gt; = 172.5 MeV. Nuclear Physics A, 445, 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(85)90453-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96306-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibbs, W.R. (2006) Computation in Modern Physics. 3rd Edition, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>