<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9423</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/pp.2019.1011041</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">PP-96293</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effectiveness of the Experimental Fosfatriclaben in Comparison with Two Commercial Fasciolicides in Cattle
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tania</surname><given-names>Rojas-Campos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yolanda</surname><given-names>Vera-Montenegro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Miguel</surname><given-names>Flores-Ramos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rafael</surname><given-names>Castillo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alicia</surname><given-names>Hernández-Campos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Froylán</surname><given-names>Ibarra-Velarde</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Facultad de Química, Departamento de Farmacia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Departamento de Parasitología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>498</fpage><lpage>506</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The aim of the present study was to compare the fasciolicidal efficacy in cattle of an experimental water-soluble compound, named fosfatriclaben, a prodrug of triclabendazole, with two commercial fasciolicides. For this, twenty-four cross mixed milking cows, aged between 1 to 3 years, naturally infected with 
  <em>Fasciola hepatica</em>, were used. To apply the treatment, animals were divided into 4 groups of 6 animals each being ranked according to their fecal fluke-egg count from the highest to the lowest number of eggs. The compounds were administered in the groups with a single dose. Group 1 (G1) was treated with 6 mg/kg/IM of fosfatriclaben, G2 was treated with triclabendazole at 12 mg/kg/PO; G3 was treated with 5% closantel at 10 mg/kg/SC and G4 was administered with 5 mL/IM of deionized water and served as untreated control. Fecal samples were analyzed on days—8, 0 (treatment day), 7, 14, 21 and 28 to count the number of fasciola eggs before and after the treatment using the sedimentation test. The efficacy was assessed as the percentage of fluke-egg reduction on treated groups relative to the untreated control. The resulting data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test, using the statistical IBM SPSS 24.0 (2016) program. Results indicated a fluke-egg reduction of 100% for fosfatriclaben along the study; triclabendazole showed an efficacy of 99.7% - 100% from day 7 to day 28. In the case of closantel, values from 98.8% to 99.6% were recorded from day 7 to day 28. No statistical differences between treatments were observed (P &lt; 0.05). It was concluded that the experimental fosfatriclaben administered at 6 mg/kg/IM to naturally infected cattle exerted a fasciolicidal efficacy similar to the drugs of choice for the treatment of fasciolosis (triclabendazole) when administered at 12 mg/kg/ PO, and closantel injected at 10 mg/kg/SC.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Fasciola hepatica&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Prodrug</kwd><kwd> Triclabendazole</kwd><kwd> Closantel</kwd><kwd> Cattle</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Fasciolosis is a zoonotic parasitic disease of worldwide distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref1">1</xref>] caused by the liver fluke Fasciola hepatica which affects different kind of animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref2">2</xref>]. Its relevance relies in huge economic losses in cattle production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref4">4</xref>]. Among different drugs used to treat this disease, triclabendazole has shown high efficacy against young and adult stages with a wide margin of safety when applied by the oral route [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref6">6</xref>]. Closantel is also a fasciolicide of choice; in addition, it also kills nematodes such as Haemonchus contortus, and the fly Oestrus ovis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>Recently our research group has synthesized a new water-soluble triclabendazole prodrug, named fosfatriclaben. This new compound increased the aqueous solubility 88,000-fold with respect to its precursor compound (triclabendazole) and allowed the formation of an aqueous solution for IM administration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref9">9</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>In this work, we present the fasciolicidal efficacy of the fosfatriclaben compared with two commercials well known fasciolicides in naturally infested cattle.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Location</title><p>The present study was carried out during the month of march, 2019, in a farm named “Mi Alma” located at approximately 150 km from Mexico City.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Animals</title><p>Twenty-four cross mixed adult bovines, both sexes, aged between 1 to 3 years, naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica were used. Food was provided as a balanced feed containing oats, alfalfa and ensilage. Water was available ad libitum.</p><p>The animals were previously selected on day 8 as positive to fasciola-eggs</p><p>using the traditional sedimentation test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref10">10</xref>]. Shortly, feces were collected directly from the rectum and thoroughly homogenized to place 5 g in a glass using tap water. The mixture was placed in a beaker and sifted with the aid of a plastic sieve. After 10 min repose, the supernatant was decanted and fulfilled again with tap water. The process was repeated until the sediment was observed clean. The final sediment was observed under stereoscopic microscope to carry out the fluke-egg counting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>The animals were identified by ear tag.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Conduction of the Study</title><p>To apply the treatment, animals were divided into 4 groups of 6 animals each being ranked according to their fecal-egg count from the highest to the lowest number of eggs.</p><p>Group 1 (G1) was treated with 6 mg/kg of the experimental water-soluble fosfatriclaben injected once by the IM route. G2 was treated with triclabendazole (Fasimec<sup>&#174;</sup> Elanco Australasia) given once at 12 mg/kg/PO; G3 was treated with 5% closantel<sup>&#174;</sup> (Closantil-Chinoin) at 10 mg/kg/SC and G4 was the control group and it was injected with 5 mL of deionized water.</p><p>Fecal samples were analyzed by the sedimentation test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref10">10</xref>], on days −8, 0 (day of treatment), 7, 14, 21 and 28 to count the number of eggs present in each one of the experimental animals, following the guide for evaluation of anthelmintics suggested by the World Association for Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref12">12</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Assessment of Efficacy</title><p>The efficacy was calculated as the percentage of fluke-egg reduction on the treated groups, relative to the untreated control, according to the following formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Efficacy = Arithmetic   mean   number   of   fluke   eggs   ( Control ) − Arithmeticmeannumber   of   fluke   eggs   ( Treated ) Arithmeticmeannumberof   flukeeggs   ( Control ) &#215; 100</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The obtained data were compared between the experimental groups using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. They were analyzed with the statistical IBM SPSS 24.0 (2016) software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref13">13</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the coprological analyses in which the total and mean number of fluke-eggs, observed in the experimental groups.</p><p>The percentage of efficacy exerted by fosfatriclaben, triclabendazole and closantel, at 7, 14, 21 and 28 days post-treatment is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Fosfatriclaben showed 100% reduction of eggs from day 7 to day 28; triclabendazole dosed orally showed an efficacy of 99.7% at day 7, and 100% from day 14 to day 28.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage of fluke-egg reduction before and after treatment with fosfatriclaben compared with two commercial fasciolicides in cattle naturally infected with Fasciola hepatica</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Group (n = 6)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Compound and route of administration</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dose rate (mg/Kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Days of fecal sampling</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Fosfatriclaben (IM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Efficacy (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Triclabendazole (PO)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Efficacy (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Closantel (SC)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Efficacy (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Control group</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >untreated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >760</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*day of treatment.</p><p>Finally, closantel showed values between 98.8% and 99.7% in the study. No significant differences were observed when the experimental treated groups were compared (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>It is well known that an experimental compound should have high solubility, suitable chemical stability and neutral pH to be adequate for intramuscular application [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref14">14</xref>]. This could be of great value in veterinary medicine, since it is common to prefer the parenteral treatment application considering the different advantages such as easy of treatment, decreasing stress of the animals, decreasing danger to the operator, the bioavailability of the drug is faster than oral-dosing products. In fact, it is a good advantage since the drug applied intramuscularly reaches the site of action without passing by the gastrointestinal barriers which may affect the drug bioavailability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Another important point is that the injectable drugs require less active ingredient to provoke a clinical effect and therefore less quantity of compound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>It is important to know that fosfatriclaben uses only half of the dose (6 mg/kg/ IM) to achieve 100% egg reduction, in comparison with its precursor triclabendazole (12 mg/kg/PO). This can be considered relevant since the environment could be less contaminated.</p><p>In 2014, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref14">14</xref>] described the synthesis of a benzimidazole derivative named alfa-pro the compound being highly soluble in water. This compound was initially tested under in vitro conditions rendering 100% efficacy against newly excysted flukes. Afterwards, the authors tested the compound in artificially infected sheep at a dose of 4 mg/kg/IM removing 87.8% of flukes. Recently, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref17">17</xref>] determined the effective dose of the alfa-pro against immature and adult Fasciola hepatica in experimentally infected sheep. This benzimidazole soluble drug cleared 97.6%, 98.5% and 98.8% of adult flukes when administered at 6, 8 and 10 mg/kg/IM, respectively, and 81.2% at 6 mg/kg/IM against 5-week-old flukes.</p><p>Considering that nowadays the bioavailability of benzimidazoles have increased tremendously, and been aware of the great potential of triclabendazole as fasciolicide, it was decided to create the new fosfatriclaben for parenteral use expecting to obtain similar efficacy to its oral precursor (triclabendazol) with the advantage of using half of the dose required to remove adult and juvenile flukes.</p><p>Wood et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref11">11</xref>] mentioned that studies like this in which the fluke-egg reduction is evaluated, give valuable information in cattle, even when the number of adult flukes removed is unknown. Unfortunately, critical tests in cattle involving sacrifice are very expensive to run, therefore the alternative to assess egg-reduction in cattle is widely accepted and considered of a great value.</p><p>On the other hand, no significant differences were observed between treatments (P &lt; 0.05), indicating that possibly fosfatriclaben, applied once by the intramuscular route to cattle is as effective as its precursor triclabendazole (PO), recognized to date as the most effective and safer fasciolicidal agent. However, is important to note that not in all cases triclabendazole has removed 100% of flukes, perhaps this is in part because of the appearance of resistance to this drug in different parts of the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref20">20</xref>].</p><p>It is important to emphasize that none of the other commercial fasciolicides tested were able to remove fluke eggs at 100% along period of the experiment.</p><p>Different studies have demonstrated the high fasciolicidal efficacy exerted by closantel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref21">21</xref>]. However, this drug only exerts high efficacy to flukes older than 6 weeks of age. Certainly, this confer the probability to the remaining flukes after treatment could be continue maturing to produce more eggs.</p><p>In coincidence with data obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref22">22</xref>] who treated 41 cows with closantel at 5 mg/kg/SC; then, they found fluke-eggs 3 weeks after the treatment.</p><p>In addition, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96293-ref23">23</xref>] observed fluke-eggs after treatment with closantel, obtaining 72% and 92% of efficacy. Nevertheless, closantel is still being well recognized as a good fasciolicide and it also shows good efficacy against other parasites such as Haemonchus contortus and Oestrus ovis.</p><p>In contrast to this situation, fosfatriclaben at present reaches up to 100% efficacy since as a new experimental drug is used in a very limited manner.</p><p>Results obtained in this study suggest that the experimental fosfatriclaben is a good candidate to be consider for the treatment of fasciolosis in cattle. Further studies will determine the real potential of this experimental drug indicated for parenteral use in sheep and cattle.</p><p>At present, this drug is under different biological tests aimed to know the mode of action, drug stability as well as the withholding period. This compound is patented by the Mexican Institute for Industrial Protection (Instituto Mexicano de la Protecci&#243;n Industrial) (MX2014014417A) and it also obtained the patent of USA (US10239842 B2).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The experimental fosfatriclaben, a highly water-soluble prodrug, administered at 6 mg/kg/IM to naturally infected cattle exerted similar fasciolicidal efficacy to its precursor triclabendazole when it is dosed at 12 mg/kg/PO, and closantel injected at 10 mg/kg/SC.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by UNAM-PAPIIT-IT201018. M. Flores-Ramos is very grateful to Direcci&#243;n General de Asuntos del Personal Acad&#233;mico (DGAPA, UNAM) for the Postdoctoral fellowship granted. The authors are indebted to Laboratorios Loeffler for kind donation of triclabendazole. The authors are grateful to the owners of the farm “Mi Alma”, for permission to use their cattle.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Availability of Data and Material</title><p>All datasets are included in this manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Funding</title><p>The present study was carried out thanks to the project PAPIIT-DEGPA-UNAM No. RT201018.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Contributors</title><p>MFR, RC, AHC contributed with the synthesis of the fosfatriclaben, manuscript revision and discussion. All other authors contributed to the study design, carried out the field study, performed laboratory analysis, collaborated with results interpretation, data analysis, manuscript revision and discussion: Performed statistical data analysis and suggested the experimental design: FIV, YVM, and Wrote the paper: FIV with input from YVM Grant funding: FIV. All authors supervised the experimental procedures, read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Animal Research</title><p>The work was carried out adhering to the guidelines of the Institutional Committee for Use and Care of Experimental Animals of the institution, according to the Mexican Official Regulation NOM-062-ZOO-1999 and Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments guidelines was followed.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rojas-Campos, T., Vera-Montenegro, Y., Flores-Ramos, M., Cas- tillo, R., Hern&#225;ndez-Campos, A. and Ibarra- Velarde, F. (2019) Effectiveness of the Experimental Fosfatriclaben in Comparison with Two Commercial Fasciolicides in Cattle. Pharmacology &amp; Pharmacy, 10, 498-506. https://doi.org/10.4236/pp.2019.1011041</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96293-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soliman, F.M. (2008) Epidemiological Review of Human and Animal Fascioliasis in Egypt. Journal of Infect Developing Countries, 2, 182-189.https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.260https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19738348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gil, L.C., Díaz, A., Rueda, C., Martínez, C., Castillo, D. and Apt, W. (2014) Fascioliasis hepática humana: Resistencia al tratamiento con triclabendazol. Revista Médica de Chile, 142, 1330-1333. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872014001000014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bennett, R., Christiansen, K. and Hadley, R. (1999) Preliminary Estimates of the Direct Cost Associated with Endemic Diseases of Livestock in Great Britain. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 39, 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(99)00003-3https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10327436</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaplan, R.M. (2002) Fasciola hepatica: A Review of the Economic Impact in Cattle and Considerations for Control. Veterinary Therapeutics, 2, 40-50.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19753697</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boray, J.C., Crowfoot, P.D., Strong, M.B., Allison, J.R., Schellenbaum, M., Von Orelli M. and Sarasin, G. (1983) Treatment of Immature and Mature Fasciola hepatica Infections in Sheep with Triclabendazole. Veterinary Record, 113, 315-317.https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.113.14.315https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6649348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibarra, V.F., Montenegro, C.N., Vera, M.Y., Castillo, B.R., Hernández, C.A. and Ochoa, G.P. (2002) Comparative Efficacy of an Experimental Fasciolicide, Triclabendazole and Closantel in Cattle Naturally Infected with Fasciola hepatica. Veterinaria México, 33, 237-245. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/vetmex/vm-2002/vm023c.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rothwell, J. and Sangster, N. (1997) Haemonchus contortus: The Uptake and Metabolism of Closantel. International Journal of Parasitology, 27, 313-319.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(96)00200-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matos, V., Rodríguez, D., Alfonso, P., Martín, J., Mengana, E., Pérez, E., Moya, S. and Matos, K. (2011) Antiparasitic Efficacy of Ivermectin and Closantel in Naturally oestrus ovis Infested Sheeps. Revista de Salud Animal, 33, 184-189.http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0253-570X2011000300007&amp;lng=es&amp;tlng=es</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flores-Ramos, M., Ibarra-Velarde, F., Jung-Cook, H., Hernández-Campos, A., Vera-Montenegro, Y. and Castillo, R. (2017) Novel Triclabendazole Prodrug: A Highly Water Soluble Alternative for the Treatment of Fasciolosis. Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 27, 616-619.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodríguez, V.R., Galera, C. and Amira, L. (2015) Técnicas diagnósticas en Parasitología Veterinaria. 2da Edición, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wood, I.B., Amaral, N.K., Bairden, K., Duncan, J.L., Kassai, T. and Malone, J.B. (1995) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) Second Edition of Guidelines for Evaluating the Efficacy of Anthelmintics in Ruminants (Bovine, Ovine, Caprine). Veterinary Parasitology, 58, 181-213.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(95)00806-2https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7571325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marchiondo, A.A., Holdsworth, P.A., Fourie, L.J., Rugg, D., Hellmann, K., Snyder, D.E. and Dryden, M.W. (2013) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) Second Edition: Guidelines for Evaluating the Efficacy of Parasiticides for the Treatment, Prevention and Control of Flea and Tick Infestations on Dogs and Cats. Veterinary Parasitology, 194, 84-97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.02.003https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23741753</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics Para Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flores, R.M., Ibarra, V.F., Hernández, C.A., Vera, M.Y., Jung, C.H., Cantó, A.G.J., Del Rivero, L.M. and Castillo, R. (2014) A Highly Water Soluble Benzimidazole Derivative Useful for the Treatment of Fasciolosis. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 24, 5814-5817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.10.017https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25455496</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Spahn, J.D. and Szefler S.J. (2008) Chapter 16, Pharmacology of the Lung and Drug Therapy. In: Taussig, L.M. and Landau, L.I., Eds., Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, 2nd Edition, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, 219-233.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-032304048-8.50020-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sumano, L., Ocampo, C. and Gutiérrez, O. (2015) Farmacología Veterinaria. Mc Graw Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibarra, F., Vera, Y., Quiroz, H., Cantó, J., Castillo, R., Hernández, A. and Ochoa, P. (2018) Determination of the Effective Dose of an Experimental Fasciolicide in Naturally and Experimentally Infected Cattle. Veterinary Parasitology, 120, 65-74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.12.005https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15019144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romero, J., Villaguala, C., Quiroz, F., Landaeta-Aqueveque, C., Alfaro, G. and Pérez, R. (2019) Flukicide Efficacy against Fasciola hepatica of Triclabendazole and Nitroxynil in Cattle of the Central Valley of Chile. Revista Brasileira de Parasitología Veterinaria, 28, 164-167. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-296120180089https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892461</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stevenson, C.R., Mahoney, R.H., Fisara, P., Strehlau, G. and Reichel, M.P. (2002) The Efficacy of Formulations of Triclabendazole and Ivermectin in Combination against Liver Fluke (Fasciola hepatica) and Gastro-Intestinal Nematodes in Cattle and Sheep and Sucking Lice Species in Cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal, 80, 698-701. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2002.tb11303.xhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12465830</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vera, M.Y., Ibarra, V.F., Quiroz, R.H., Hernández, C.A. and Castillo, R. (2003) Field Trial on the Efficacy of an Experimental Fasciolicide Compared with Some Commercial Compounds in Naturally Infected Cattle. Parasitology Research, 91, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-003-0901-yhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12844256</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fairweather, I. and Boray, J.C. (1999) Fasciolicides: Efficacy, Actions, Resistance and Its Management. Veterinary Journal, 158, 81-112. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.1999.0377https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10489266</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shin, S.S., Lee, C.G., Cho, S.H., Kim, J.T. and Wee, S.H. (1995) Efficacy of Closantel for the Treatment of Naturally-Acquired and Experimentally Induced Fasciola hepatica Infections in Cattle. Korean Journal of Veterinary Research, 35, 347-352. http://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO199524457071152.page</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96293-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Novobilsky, A. and H&amp;ouml;glund, J. (2015) First report of Closantel Treatment Failure against Fasciola hepatica in Cattle. International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance, 5, 172-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.07.003https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448903</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>