<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJET</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Engineering and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-4222</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjet.2019.74045</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJET-96238</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Application Research of Gravel and Machine-Made Sand along the KKH-2 Project in Pakistan on Asphalt Pavement
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jun</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhiqiang</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Overseas Branch of China Communications Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd., Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Water Conservancy and Architecture, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>622</fpage><lpage>633</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  According to the characteristics of stone along the KKH-2 project in Pakistan, the applicability of gravel and machine-made sand for road engineering was studied. Through investigation, the types of stone along the project were relatively simple, and the stone materials used for road construction were mainly limestone, sandstone and pebbles, and the reserves 
  were
   abundant. The experiment research and analyses comparisons of the parameters and road performance characteristics of natural gravel materials were carried out, and the design parameters and road performance indicators of natural grit in the current code were supplemented and adjusted to make it more suitable for Pakistan to use natural gravel materials for road construction. Thesis combines the project
  , 
  proposing that mechanism sand and natural sand mixed concrete 
  is
   not inferior 
  to
  natural sand mixed concrete in terms of technical performance, and the overall cost is lower than that of natural sand mixed concrete. The research results are of great significance for saving engineering construction costs, ensuring road performance and prolonging service life.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pakistan KKH-2 Project</kwd><kwd> Stone along the Line</kwd><kwd> Machine-Made Sand  Concrete</kwd><kwd> Experimental Research</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Preface</title><p>This paper is based on the Pakistan KKH-2 Takot-Heveriyang Highway Project, which belongs to the Highway between the Haveli and Thakot sections of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, via Abbottabad, Mansehra and Hinkiari. The project area is 860 - 1880 m above sea level. The starting line mileage is K60 + 898.876 - K80 + 318, (ZK80 + 330) (except for ZK73 + 317 - ZK75 + 030 and K73 + 280 - K75 + 015 tunnels), with a total length of 19.419 km. According to preliminary investigations, the types of stone along the project are relatively single. The stone materials that can be used for road construction are mainly limestone, sandstone and pebbles, and the reserves are abundant. Since the choice of road construction materials is directly related to the performance and economy of the road, in order to rationally select local road construction materials, it is necessary to carry out the application research in-depth of the gravel and machine-made sand along the line of the KKH-2 phase Tarcote-Heverly Yang road in the asphalt. The application research in the mixture solves the applicability of the gravel and machine-made sand materials along the line for the sub-layers of the asphalt pavement surface, as well as the deficiencies of production process and quality control of the gravel and machine-made sand materials. It provides technical support for the use of gravel and machine-made sand materials in the construction of the special-Heverly Yang highway project, and provides reference for other engineering construction projects.</p><p>Therefore, under the premise of meeting the design and use requirements, the application research of gravel and machine-made sand along the KKH-2 Tacote-Heverly Yang road in the asphalt pavement surface layer is carried out, following the principle of “depending on local conditions, local materials, convenient construction, and cost savings”，which is of great significance for ensuring project quality and saving construction costs.</p><p>The research content of this paper has certain practical significance for the comprehensive implementation of the road construction principle of “adapting to local conditions and local materials”, and comprehensively promoting the construction of Pakistan’s road network, and especially it has important reference value for Pakistan pavement structure design, engineering construction, maintenance and application of natural gravel, and it is of great significance for effectively utilizing Pakistan’s natural gravel material resources, reducing construction cost and promoting environmental protection.</p><p>The results of the US SHRP program show that the angularity of the fine aggregate significantly affects the VV, VMA, water stability and shear strength of the asphalt mixture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref1">1</xref>]. Anthony D. Staston et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref2">2</xref>] believed that the angularity of fine aggregates had a great influence on the compaction of the pavement during the rolling stage, but had little effect on the compaction of the pavement during the operation period. Breakah [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref3">3</xref>] and Bausano [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref4">4</xref>] studied the influence of fine aggregate angularity on the design life of asphalt pavement. When using the same lithological fine aggregate, the angularity is good, and the pavement design life is long. Otherwise, the pavement design life is short. In addition, they also studied the correlation between angularity and stability, and the results showed that the correlation was good. Moore and Welke et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref5">5</xref>] are consistent with and Breakah and Bausano, and believes that stability and angularity are better correlated. In addition, Han Haifeng and Lv Weimin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref6">6</xref>] of Tongji University have shown that the machine-made sand angularity has an important impact on the water stability of asphalt pavement.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Usage Situation of Machine-Made Sand</title><p>The project site is extremely rich in sand and gravel materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref7">7</xref>]. Natural sand gravel materials have long been used as the base layer for secondary and below roads and the base layer for all grades of roads [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref8">8</xref>]. In recent years, with the rapid development of the economy, higher requirements have been placed on road capacity and pavement performance. In Pakistan, not only high-grade roads, but also many secondary roads have gradually adopted cement-stabilized gravel as the base layer, and the natural gravel that has been used for decades has gradually been eliminated as the secondary road pavement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96238-ref11">11</xref>]. Although the semi-rigid base layer has many advantages, it also has problems such as easy cracking and high cost, and is it necessary to use a semi-rigid base layer for the secondary road? How much load can the graded gravel be used as the base of the pavement? Can we not use it in the secondary road? In order to solve these problems, the research project systematically studies and analyzes the parameters and road performance characteristics of natural gravel materials, and supplements and adjusts the design parameters and road performance indicators of natural grit in the current regulations to make it more suitable for Pakistan’s need to build roads with natural gravel materials.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Research Process</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Concrete Preparation Target</title><p>1) The mixture has good workability, large fluidity, cohesiveness, water retention, self-tightness and other properties. Under the premise of ensuring the quality, the slump value is designed to a maximum value of 230 mm to prevent the temperature of the mixture from being high and the slump loss is too large and the concrete pseudo-condensation phenomenon occurs under high temperature and long-distance pumping conditions. It can also reduce unfavorable factors such as excessive mixing error caused by uneven water content of the material.</p><p>2) Considering the unfavorable factors such as mixing error and the effect of low temperature in winter to reduce the strength of concrete, the natural strength of the prepared concrete specimens must be greater than 90% for 3 days to meet the construction needs of prestressed concrete, and reduce the concrete creep variables to ensure the tensile quality. The 28-day compressive strength of the formulated C30 concrete is not less than 30 MPa.</p><p>3) The retardation time of the prepared mixture meets the construction requirements, and the concrete pouring is 16 - 18 hours according to the pouring amount and the production capacity of the mixing station. The retarding time should not be too long, which will affect the early strength growth of concrete; it should not be too short, because it will affect the quality of concrete.</p><p>4) Select retarding high-efficiency water reducing agent and admixture to improve various properties of concrete, reduce hydration heat, and delay the release rate of hydration heat. The concrete mix ratio design meets the requirements of the design specifications of the anti-seepage concrete mix ratio and improves the crack resistance of the concrete.</p><p>5) Under the premise of ensuring the good working degree of the concrete mixture, the water-to-binder ratio can be reduced as much as possible to improve the strength of the concrete, reduce the shrinkage of the concrete, and reinforce the durability of the concrete.</p><p>6) The concrete elastic modulus Eh is not less than 3.0 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> MPa.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Trial Raw Materials</title><p>According to the above objectives, combined with the C30 grade concrete mix ratio test in the construction site test room, the Best Way low alkali cement with a strength grade of 42.5 is used, and all indicators meet the requirements of Pakistan standards; high quality class II fly ash produced by Tacote Power Plant, Pakistan; S95 grade mineral powder produced in Pakistan, each indicator meets the requirements; The machine-made sand is the coarse sand of Zone I from the Tarcott Stone Field, with a fineness modulus of 3.4 and a stone powder content of 13%; The coarse aggregate is a 5 - 31.5 mm continuous graded gravel in the Tarcott stone field; The admixture is selected from polycarboxylate superplasticizer produced in Pakistan; Use clean groundwater for mixing water. Some of the material pictures are as follows: (Figures 1-4).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Preliminary Determination of C30 Grade Concrete Mix Ratio</title><p>According to the C30 grade concrete reference mix ratio by the laboratory early stage test and machine-made sand replaced in proportion, five ideal C30 grade concretes was initially determined, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The compressive strength of each age of each mix concrete was compared by the following test: (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>The test results show that the optimum replacement rate of the concrete performance of each mix ratio is selected to determine the most economical mix ratio.</p><p>It can be seen from the test results that when the substitution rate of the machine-made sand is between 30% and 50%, the working performance of the concrete is basically the same, but the substitution rate is relatively good at 30%. The main reason is that the machine-made sand particles have more angular edges and the surface is rougher than natural sand. With the increase of the amount of machine-made sand, the frequency of the machine-made sand surface contact with each other increases, which affects the fluidity of the concrete.</p><p>The following is an attempt to replace the natural sand with 50% high stone powder sand to prepare C20 to C50 pumped concrete to see if it can meet the working performance, pouring performance and strength.</p><p>Then try to apply to the C20 to C50 grades of concrete, and compare the corresponding work performance and compressive strength (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> C30 pumping concrete different mechanism sand substitution rate test ratio</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cementitious material (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fine aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Machine-made sand substitution rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coarse aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water reducing agent dosage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >527.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Test results of different machine-made sand substitution rate of C30 pumped concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Workability description</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Slump (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Compressive strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability and better cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability and good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> C20 - C50 pumping concrete 50% machine-made sand substitution rate test ratio</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cementitious material (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fine aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Machine-made sand substitution rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coarse aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water reducing agent dosage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The results showed that:</p><p>When the high stone powder content machine-made sand replaces 50% of the natural sand, in order to make the working performance of the concrete meet the requirements, it is necessary to increase the dosage of the admixture, especially the high-grade concrete. Thus, the cost advantage of using machine-made sand for concrete is compromised and can also cause other problems.</p><p>Therefore, the next step is to pass the high-silver content of the machine-made sand through a 0.630 mm sieve, sieve the stone powder and fine</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Test results of 50% machine-made sand substitution rate of C20 - C50 pumped concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Workability description</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Slump (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Compressive strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, slight bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, no bleeding, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>particles and then test it to see if the amount of admixture can be reduced after the stone powder is reduced, meanwhile the replacement rate is also 50% natural sand (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>The results showed that:</p><p>The high stone powder content factor has a certain influence on the factors affecting the working performance of the concrete prepared by replacing the natural sand with the high sand powder content machine-made sand. However, the mixed concrete work performance issues can be better solved by improving or increasing the amount of the water reducing agent.</p><p>Next, the natural sand was replaced by 30% and 50% substitution rate for medium and low-grade pumping concrete, and the corresponding work performance and compressive strength were compared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p><p>The results showed that:</p><p>For medium and low-grade pumping concrete, the mixed concrete workability is better when we replace 30% natural sand with machine-made sand, and the concrete with 50% substitution rate is relatively poor. Even if the dosage of admixture is increased, it is still impossible to solve the problem of poor compatibility.</p><p>The following experiment was conducted with the use of machine-made sand at 50% and 100% replacement rate for ordinary pavement concrete and low slump concrete (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Machine-made sand substitution rate test after 50% sifting of C20 - C50 pumped concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cementitious material (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fine aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Machine-made sand substitution rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coarse aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water reducing agent dosage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >367.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Test results of machine-made sand substitution rate after 50% sifting of C20 - C50 pumped concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Workability description</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Slump (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Compressive strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability and good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability and good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of sand substitution rate test rates for different machine-made sand of low-grade pumping concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cementitious material (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fine aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Machine-made sand substitution rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coarse aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water reducing agent dosage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >556.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >542.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >528.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Test results of sand substitution rate of different machine-made for low-grade pumping concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Workability description</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Slump (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Compressive strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Machine-made mixed sand test ratio of ordinary pavement concrete and low slump concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cementitious material (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fine aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Machine-made sand substitution rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coarse aggregate (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Water reducing agent dosage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Machine-made mixed sand test results of ordinary pavement concrete and low slump concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Test number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Design strength level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Workability description</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Slump (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Compressive strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Generality</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average fluidity and good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor workability, knotting, bottoming</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, poor cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability, good cohesiveness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good workability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Analysis and Experience of Test Results</title><p>1) The machine-made sand produced in the process of crushed stone production has high content of sandstone powder, poor particle size distribution, and high stone powder content can only be used to prepare concrete less than C30 grade. If the concrete is mixed with machine-made sand natural sand in a ratio of 3:7, the pumped concrete of less than C40 grade can be well prepared.</p><p>2) Replace the natural sand with 30% high stone powder content machine-made sand to prepare pumped concrete. The mechanical properties of the powder are slightly better than pure natural sand due to the filling effect of the stone powder. It is effective to replace natural sand with 50% machine-made sand to prepare ordinary pavement concrete and low slump concrete, and it is not necessary to significantly increase the dosage of admixture, and the economic benefit is obvious.</p><p>3) Using high stone powder content machine-made sand to replace part of natural sand to prepare concrete can not only save natural resources, but also save costs and have significant economic benefits.</p><p>4) In combination with the actual situation in the region, the high stone powder content machine-made sand needs to be properly treated before use to better ensure the quality stability of the machine-made sand.</p><p>5) From the experimental research and experience accumulation, determine the optimal cooperation of mixed sand concrete and pure natural sand concrete, such as the following <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Cost Analysis</title><p>Although the amount of admixture used in the pumping concrete which use mixed sand is improved, the mixed sand is cheaper than the pure natural sand, especially in the low slump concrete and the pavement concrete machine-made sand have a higher substitution rate, and the admixture dosage is basically the same, and the cost advantage is more obvious. The medium and low level pumping concrete can save 3 yuan, and the ordinary road surface and low slump non-pumping concrete can save more than 6 yuan, and the comprehensive economic benefits are obvious (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2).</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Mixing ratio of mixed sand concrete and pure natural sand concrete</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Serial number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Power level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concrete type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Concrete prepared ratio (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slag powder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fly ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Machine-made sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guamite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 3 stone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Admixture dosage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >528.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >556.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >542.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low slump non-pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low slump non-pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pavement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pavement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Concrete cost analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concrete grade</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concrete type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cost (yuan/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Spread (yuan/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand saving cost</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increased cost of water reducer</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(226.5 &#215; 20)/1000 = 4.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.2% = 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(238.5 &#215; 20)/1000 = 4.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.15% = 0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(232.5 &#215; 20)/1000 = 4.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.15% = 0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low slump non-pumping class</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(375 &#215; 20)/1000 = 7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.1% = 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ordinary pavement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(340 &#215; 20)/1000 = 6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310 &#215; 2 &#215; 0.1% = 0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the above table, the price difference per cubic meter of the machine-made sand and the pure natural sand is calculated as 30 yuan/ton; The water reducing agent is calculated at a price difference of about RMB 20/ton.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>1) The machine-made sand produced in the process of crushed stone production has high content of sandstone powder and poor particle-level matching. If the machine-made sand is mixed with natural sand in a ratio of 3:7, the pumped concrete of less than C40 grade can be well prepared.</p><p>2) If machine-made sand mixes with natural sand in a ratio of 1:1, the effect of preparing ordinary pavement concrete and low slump concrete is good, and the dosage of admixture is not obviously increased, and the economic benefit is obvious.</p><p>3) Using high stone powder content machine-made sand to replace part of natural sand to prepare concrete can not only save natural resources, but also save costs and have significant economic benefits.</p><p>4) In combination with the actual situation of the KKH-2 project in Pakistan, the high stone powder content machine-made sand needs to be properly treated before use to better ensure the quality stability of the machine-made sand.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hu, J., Tian, X., Wang, G. and Wang, Z.Q. (2019) Application Research of Gravel and Machine-Made Sand along the KKH-2 Project in Pakistan on Asphalt Pavement. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7, 622-633. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2019.74045</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96238-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SHRP-A-415 (1994) Permanent Deformation Response of Asphalt Aggregate Mixes. N.C.R, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stakston, A.D., Bahia, H.U. and Bushek, J.J. (2002) Effect of Fine Aggregate Angularity on Compaction and Shearing Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 14-24.  
https://doi.org/10.3141/1789-02</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breakah, T.M. and Williams, R.C. (2013) Dynamic Testing of Hot Mix Asphalt for Moisture Susceptibility Assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 636-642.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bausano, J., Post, N.L., Case, S.W. and Lesko, J.J. (2006) Modeling the Remaining Strength of Structural Composite Materials Subjected to Fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue, 28, 1100-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.02.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, J. and Welke, J.E. (2014) Effect of the Physical Properties of Aggregates on Aggregate-Asphalt Bond Measured Using the UCL Method. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, H.F. and Lu, W.M. (2002) Effect of Fine Aggregate Angularity on Performance of Asphalt Mixture. Journal of Tongji University, 30, 302-306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, L.H. (2006) Concrete Materials Science. Hohai University Press, Shanghai.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names> Z.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Experimental Study on the Application of Tailings in Ready-Mixed Concrete</article-title><source> Commercial Concrete</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 42</fpage>-<lpage>46</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names> Z.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2018</year>)<article-title>Application of Machine-Made Sand in Asphalt Pavement Structure Layer</article-title><source> Highway Transportation Technology</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 6</fpage>-<lpage>7</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, T.T. (2009) Application Research of Mechanism Sand in Jicha Expressway. Master Thesis of Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96238-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fang, S.W. (2015) Adaptability of Mechanism Sand in Asphalt Mixture. Master’s Thesis of Chang’an University, Chang’an, 6.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>