<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2019.1010135</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-96142</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Study of Radio-Sensitivity of Strawberry Runners &lt;i&gt;cv. Fortuna&lt;/i&gt; under Moroccan Conditions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aicha</surname><given-names>El Oualkadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Mouhib</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Badr</surname><given-names>Hajjaj</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Regional Agricultural Research Center of Tangier, National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Tangier, Morocco</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1921</fpage><lpage>1931</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In recent years
  ,
   strawberry is being successfully cultivated in Loukkos perimeter of Morocco and a wide range of varieties are being grown. The strawberry crop also generates 3 million working days per year. In fact, all plants are imported and prices are exorbitant. Varietal improvement is essential if a new impetus is to be given to the morocco strawberry. We have accordingly started a mutation breeding program by bud irradiation. Strawberry runners of cv
  .
   Fortuna
   were exposed to increasing doses of acute gamma rays. The physiological effects induced by irradiation were evaluated from cutting survival and growth. It has been determined that the doses of gamma and the varieties used are significant on the number of surviving plants and plant growth parameters. It was determined that low doses gamma irradiation respectively affected plant height, leaf length, leaf width and the number of leaves. These results allowed us, in the first instance, to fix the optimal dose range for cutting irradiated at 62 Grays.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Strawberry</kwd><kwd> Radiosensitivity</kwd><kwd> Gamma Ray</kwd><kwd> Runner</kwd><kwd> Mutation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Strawberries (Fragaria spp.) are a member of the Rosaceae family and native from Europe, which scattered almost all over the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref1">1</xref>] . Strawberry varieties which widely consumed and desired by the people community is a sweet, brightly colored, and large of strawberry variety. Strawberry fruits have short shelf life due to high perishability and are susceptible to mechanical injury, physiological disorders, water loss, and decay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref2">2</xref>] . In Morocco but its cultivation started only towards the end of the Seventies, in the two irrigated perimeters of Gharb-Loukkos and of Souss-Massa region. According to data of the ministry for Agriculture of Morocco, Area of this crop increased over the years, to reach approximately 3660 ha during the year 2016-2017, from which 80% are localized on the level of the area Tangier-Tetouan-Al Hoceima (Loukkos). The main destination for Moroccan strawberries remains the European Union, with 95% of the volume exported. Spain and France, Morocco’s main partners, together with the United Kingdom account for almost 90% of the market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref3">3</xref>] . The most cultivated varieties in Morocco are of California origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref4">4</xref>] . In morocco, producers are opening up to more tasteful varieties to meet a growing market demand. Overall, the varieties used are much the same as in the Huelva area (Spain), but with different propositions: Festival, Splendor, Fortuna, San Andreas, Sabrina, Ventana, Sabrossa, Lusa, Benicia and other varieties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref5">5</xref>] . The increase in the number of hectares planted with strawberries (Camarosa, Festival, Splendor and Fortuna varieties) in Morocco has been more than significant in recent years. This increase is mainly due to the increased demand for the product. Fortuna is a cultivar of short duration published by the Strawberry Variety Development Program of the University of Florida. Selected for early maturity, fruit quality and productivity, the variety is adapted to high value-added production, fresh market and winter production areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref6">6</xref>] . It took less than 500 cold hours to develop and produce properly. It is advisable to cultivate in temperate and continental climates with winters.</p><p>The strawberry generates high economic value goods and employment. However, many growers deplore a limited varietal choice, the lack of a local repository on the behavior of the varieties and their production potential, the heavy dependence of producers of foreign nurserymen on supply of plants and access to high-performance varieties. The creation of new strawberry cultivars adapted to Moroccan soil can solve the country dependence on plant import, which can improve the country’s economic balance.</p><p>Mutation improvement is an effective approach to producing varieties with improved traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref7">7</xref>] , is a genetic improvement technique that can give birth, or contribute, to the development of varieties tolerant to biotic and abiotic stress. Although there are several techniques used for mutation breeding, gamma ray technique is one of the most physical mutagens used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref9">9</xref>] . Physical mutagens such as gamma rays are less risky to health than chemical mutagens because they require no application to remove mutagen from the material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref10">10</xref>] , because they are non-toxic and do not require detoxification after implementation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref11">11</xref>] . Nowadays, the number of cultivars derived from mutation induction increases constantly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref13">13</xref>] . Several new cultivars have developed in Coriander [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref14">14</xref>] tomatoes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref16">16</xref>] Anthurium and mungbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref17">17</xref>] by using gamma rays. Gamma rays as an ionizing radiation affect plant growth and development by inducing cytological, biochemical, physiological and morphological changes in cells and tissues via producing free radicals in cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The most important point in mutation studies is to determine the appropriate dose for the species. Regression in growth parameters in the seedling obtained from radiation-treated seeds is usually an indicator of what the plant was damaged genetically. The LD50 dose should be determined to detect the most appropriate mutation dose [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref21">21</xref>] . In order to determine the appropriate dose, the first generational seedlings (M1) and untreated seedlings are compared in terms of plant growth parameters and survival percentages [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref11">11</xref>] . This data is used to determine the dose of LD50.</p><p>Therefore, this study aims to determine the optimum dose of gamma rays for improving leaf length, leaf width, plant height and survival rate of strawberry runners cv Fortuna under Moroccan conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The Larache experimental station of INRA Tangier is located in Larache city, Morocco. It is dedicated to supporting agricultural development in the irrigated area of Loukkos, Morocco. It mainly houses research on strawberry, small red berries and horticultural crops. This research station covers 4.8 ha including 0.8 ha of greenhouses. Strawberry cultivars are grown in greenhouses and were planted with 4 complete random blocks. Each elementary parcel is made up of a ridge 60 meters long and 7 meters wide with four rows spaced 60 cm. The space between two ridges is 70 cm.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Material</title><p>The Fortuna cv strawberry was selected in this study. Plant runners of these strawberry cultivars were used as the experimental materials. Plants runner were taken from the strawberry field in mid-October 2018 and irradiated immediately by <sup>60</sup>Co-gamma ray in the National Institute of Agricultural Research Center of Tangier, morocco. The dosages were 0 Gy (non-irradiation), 20 Gy, 40 Gy, 60 Gy, 80 Gy and 100 Gy. There were 80 plant runners per treatment, and all treatments were repeated four times. After the irradiation treatment, plant runners were planted immediately in the field and conventionally managed. The death rate and the change of the leaf length, leaf width, plant height of the treated runner plants were investigated in mid-April 2019. The leaf length, leaf width and plant height were measured according to description and data standard of strawberry germplasm resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref22">22</xref>] . The death rate of the plant runners was expressed by the number of the dead plant runners divided by the number of the treated runner plants. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Each box containing 20 plants was considered as a single experimental unit that was further replicated four times.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Statistical analysis of variance was carried out by software SPSS &#174; version 20.0. The mean difference of the study parameters among the treatments was adjusted by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effects on Death Rate of Plant Runners</title><p>The death rate of the runner plant is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Gamma-rays in different doses affected the vegetative growth parameters in different ways. Rate of surviving plants reduced when dose rate increased. Radio-sensitivity of runners on the same cultivar was different. Results show that the death rate of the runner plant of Fortuna strawberry cultivar was higher remarkably in control treatment than in all treatment, and the death rate was between 27.85% and 74.84% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). There was significant difference in death rate of the runner plants irradiated by four different doses and there was no significant difference in the dose 40 Gy and 60 Gy. However, the death rate of the plant runners of Fortuna strawberry cultivar was higher remarkably with 20 Gy, 40 Gy and 60 Gy than in 80 Gy, and there was no significant difference between 40 Gy and 60 Gy. The death rate of runner plants of Fortuna strawberry cultivar was low with 100 Gy.</p><p>The correlation between radiation dose and cumulative percent of bud was r = −0.96 (with P value = 0.002). The equation of related regression based on radiation dose is Y = 90.21 − 0.59X (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Based on the minimum level of 50% of runner surviving compared to control, lead us to locate the optima radiation dose between 60 and 65 Gy for the Fortuna strawberry cultivar. The yield of runner surviving of these treatments was satisfactory since the rate of survival was ranged from 27.85% to 87.5%.</p><p>As a result, GR 50 dose for the application of mutation breeding of Fortuna strawberry cultivar under Moroccan condition was determined as 62 Gy. The strawberry is an herbaceous fruit tree; the complete strawberry runner plant consists of root, stem and leaf. It has no obvious branch and bud, its bud hides in the stem. Thus, the stem of strawberry runner plants is similar to the branch of woody fruit tree [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref24">24</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref26">26</xref>] found GR50 dose to be 20 - 25 Gy on woody cutting of grape variety.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of gamma ray irradiation to strawberry cultivar on death rate (%) of runner plant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dosage (Gray)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Death Rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.64 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.07 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.64 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.92 cd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.85 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p (α = 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Significant differences within the same column and means followed by the same letter do not differ at Pα ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan test.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref27">27</xref>] observed a higher percentage of survival at lower doses and poor survival at higher doses in all the generations of Calendula officinalis. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref28">28</xref>] found the reduction survival of plants after exposure to gamma rays with the increase of dose in Rudbeckia laciniata. A similar trend has also been reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref29">29</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref30">30</xref>] also reported the decrease in ability to produce shoots on increasing the radiation dose in Lonicera species. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref31">31</xref>] reported the inhibitory effects of higher doses of gamma rays on strawberry cultures.</p><p>The application of high doses of gamma rays negatively influenced plant development, as in many studies previously done in different species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref35">35</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effects on Plant Runners Growth</title><p>The survival of plant runners grew further after they were planted in the field, but the plant height, leaf length, leaf width and the number of leaves of the survival of plant runners had changed compared with the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). However, the change was different according to irradiation dosage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The dose 20 Gy recorded significantly maximum plant height (11.61 cm). The minimum plant height (2.03 cm) was recorded by the dose of 100 Gy. The height plant was higher significantly similar in dose 20 Gy and 40 Gy, and significantly lower similar in dose 60 Gy and 80 Gy. The dose 100 Gy shows the very less height of plant.</p><p>The increased plant vigor caused by irradiation could be explained by stimulation of biosynthesis of some amino acids like Lysine and phenylalanine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref36">36</xref>] , modification of some enzymes activity such Polyphenol oxidase, catalases and peroxidases which are great in the leaf of treated plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref40">40</xref>] for increase of primary biochemical processes, uptake of mineral nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref41">41</xref>] and photosynthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref42">42</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref31">31</xref>] reported the inhibitory effects of higher doses of gamma rays on strawberry plant. He found that the number of roots per shoot decreased at higher gamma dosage (10 KR and 15 KR).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of gamma ray irradiation to Fortuna strawberry cultivar on growth of plant runners</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dosage (Gray)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Height (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf Length (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf Width (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Leaves</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.28 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.92 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.61 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.11 ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.68 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.95 bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.63 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.77 c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.21 bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78 d</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p (α = 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The same letter within the same column and means do not differ at Pα &gt; 0.05 according to Duncan test.</p><p>Leaf number is important for photosynthesis and it differed significantly ranging from 5.78 to 20.11. The dose 20 Gy shows the highest number of leaves (20.11) and lower number for leaves was at 100 Gy doses. The doses 40 Gy and 80 Gy were not significantly different but in the number of leaves were significantly different in other doses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Leaf length and leaf width from each irradiated plant were studied (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In the leaf length and leaf width the dose 20 Gy show the higher value 5.03 cm and 4.26 cm respectively, the lowest value for these two parameters was observed for 100 Gy dose. In leaf width, we distinguish three groups significantly different; the dose 20 Gy and 40 Gy are not significantly different also from the dose 60 and 80 Gy they are not significantly different, only the dose 100 Gy was significantly different from all the doses. The leaf length only the dose 20 Gy and 40 Gy they are significantly not different. In this study, the gamma ray influences the leaf length and leaf width (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Numerous investigators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref46">46</xref>] have presented results which indicate that cells are more vulnerable to radiation at certain stages in mitosis. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref47">47</xref>] obtained the number of leaves vitro plant varying from 60.52 to 49.00 in different germplasm, which was higher to the findings of the present study. But the finding about leaves plant reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref48">48</xref>] was lower than the present study. They found that the number of leaves ranged from 3.33 to 6.33 plants under irrigation in semi-arid region of Punjab, which might be due to the genetic as well as the environmental effect. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref49">49</xref>] obtained a variation in leaf number among cultivars during the later part of the season and found that cv. “Bolero” and “Everest” produced the highest and “Elsanta” the least number of leaves plant. Another study revealed a significant variation in leaves plant among strawberry germplasm and recorded 4.6 to 9.8 leaves plant at 86 days after planting in Cambridge.</p><p>Stimulatory effects of low doses of gamma rays on strawberry can be related to hypothesis that the low dose irradiation induce growth stimulation by changing the hormonal signaling network in plant cells or increase the anti-oxidative stress capacity of the cells to easily overcome the stress factors such as fluctuations of light intensity and temperatures in the growth condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref50">50</xref>] . In contrast, the high dose irradiation that caused growth inhibition has been ascribed to the cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase during somatic cell division and/or various damages in the entire genome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref51">51</xref>] .</p><p>Since it is possible to alter growth rate without altering radio-sensitivity at the same time, it is no longer sufficient to say that an organism is more susceptible because it is growing rapidly or because it contains cells in mitosis. It would appear that growth, as defined, is the result of a condition which determines radio-sensitivity, rather than the cause of it. It is probably more nearly correct to say that growth activity and radio-sensitivity depend on a common physiological condition in the organism-one that remains unchanged although growth may be stopped by lowering temperature.</p><p>Stems of strawberry plants were observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The strawberry plant from doses 20 Gy 40 Gy and 60 Gy show a higher number of stems in a plant like plant control. But in the plant irradiated with 80 Gy and 100 Gy, the number of stems</p><p>in a plant was lower. The character of plant robustness was influenced by the anatomical structure of the stem. This is due to the fact that strawberries are a dicotyledonous plant whose stems are subjected to secondary growth by having a lateral meristem. Additionally, the clustering life from of strawberries also supports the robustness of their stems. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96142-ref52">52</xref>] stated that phenotypic appearances could be controlled by the genetic properties of the plant itself, which are the responses to the interaction with environmental factors.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, it was aimed to determine the morphological changes occurring in strawberry runners cv Fortuna exposed to gamma irradiation (60 Co) and to determine the proper irradiation dose for mutation breeding studies. Results show that the doses applied in the study do not affect growth in strawberry runners cv Fortuna but they cause significant differences in the number of surviving plants. In this study, it was also found that the optimal irradiation dose for strawberry runners cv Fotuna was 62 Gray under Moroccan condition. Finally, results show that the radiation sensitivity of the cultivars is different by examining the surviving plants and plant growth parameters. This has once again proved that it is necessary to carry out dose determination study before starting large-scale studies.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to all technicians of INRA Larache research station for providing necessary facilities for conducting this research work.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>El Oualkadi, A., Mouhib, M. and Hajjaj, B. (2019) Study of Radio-Sensitivity of Strawberry Runners cv. Fortuna under Moroccan Conditions. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 1921-1931. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.1010135</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96142-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santosa, A.A. (2011) Pengelolaan Pembibitan Stroberi Di Vin’s Berry Park, Cisarua, Bandung Barat, Jawa Barat. Naskah Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 6 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caner, C., Aday, M.S. and Demir, M. (2008) Extending the Quality of Fresh Strawberries by Equilibrium Modified Atmosphere Packaging. European Food Research and Technology, 227, 1575-1583.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-008-0881-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonyme (2014) Note from the Red Fruits Sector. Ministry of Agriculture and Maritime Fisheries—Directorate of Strategy and Statistics. Strategic Note No. 100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Atta Aly, M. and Ezzat, M.A. (1999) Reducing Quality Loss of Strawberries during Local Marketing and Exportation by Using Different Cool Chains. In: Gerasopoulos, D., Ed., Post-Harvest Losses of Perishable Horticultural Products in the Mediterranean Region, CIHEAM-IAMC, Cahiers Options Méditerranéennes No. 42, Chania, 35-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maghreb Agriculture (2017) Professional Journal of the Fruit and Vegetable, Cereal and Livestock Sectors. No. 102 March.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonyme (2018) Fortuna&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt; Brand (Florida Fortuna Variety). EMCO CAL.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahloowalia, B.S., Maluszynski, M. and Nichterlein, K. (2004) Global Impact of Mutation-Derived Varieties. Euphytica, 135, 187-204.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000014914.85465.4f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagel, Z., Peskircioglu, H. and Tutluer, M.I. (2003) Nükleer tekniklerin bitki islahinda kullanilmasi. VIII. In Ulusal nükleer bilimler ve teknolojileri kongresi. 8th National Congress of Nuclear Science and Technology, Kayseri, 15-17 ekim 2003, s: 14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagel, Z., Tutluer, M.I., Peskircioglu, H., Kantoglu, Y. and Kunter, B. (2009) Nohutta Mutasyon Islahi. X. In Ulusal nükleer bilimler ve teknolojileri kongresi. 8th National Congress of Nuclear Science and Technology, 6-9 Ekim 2009, 313-320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, S.J., Khan, H.U., Khan, R.D., Iqbal, M.M. and Zafar, Y. (2000) Development of Sugarcane Mutants through in Vitro Mutagenesis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3, 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2000.1123.1125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mba, C. (2013) Induced Mutations Unleash the Potentials of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Agronomy, 3, 200-231.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3010200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hearn, C.J. (2001) Development of Seedless Grapefruit Cultivars through Budwood Irradiation. Hortscience, 20, 84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maluszynski, M., Ahloowalia, B.S. and Sigurbjornsson, B. (1995) Application of in Vivo and in Vitro Mutation Techniques for Crop Improvement. Euphytica, 85, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023960</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salve, K.M. and More, A.D. (2014) Effect of Gamma Radiation on Seed Germination, Seedling Height and Seedling Injury in Coriandrum sativum Linn. International Journal of Life Sciences, 2, 223-225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sikder, S., Biswas, P., Hazra, P., Akhtar, S., Chattopadhyay, A. and Badigannavar, A.M. (2013) Induction of Mutation in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by Gamma Irradiation and EMS. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 73, 392-399. https://doi.org/10.5958/j.0975-6906.73.4.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Puchooa</surname><given-names> D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>In Vitro Mutation Breeding of Anthurium by Gamma Radiation</article-title><source> International Journal of Agriculture and Biology</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 11</fpage>-<lpage>20</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangsiri, C., Sorajjapinun, W. and Srinivesc, P. (2005) Gamma Radiation Induced Mutations in Mungbean. Science Asia, 31, 251-255.  
https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2005.31.251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gunckel, J.E. and Sparrow, A.H. (1961) Encycl. Plant Physiology. In: Ruhland, W., Ed., Ionizing Radiation: Biochemical, Physiological and Morphological Aspects of Their Effects on Plants, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 555.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, J.H., Baek, M.H., Chung, B.Y., Wi, S.G. and Kim, J.S. (2004) Alterations in the Photosynthetic Pigments and Antioxidant Machineries of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Seedlings from Gamma-Irradiated Seeds. Journal of Plant Biology, 47, 314-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wi, S.G., Chung, B.Y., Kim, J.H., Baek, M.H., Yang, D.H., Lee, J.W. and Kim, J.S. (2005) Ultrastructural Changes of Cell Organelles in Arabidopsis Stem after Gamma Irradiation. Journal of Plant Biology, 48, 195-200.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030408</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Predieri, S. (2001) Mutation Induction and Tissue Culture in Improving Fruits. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 64, 185-210.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010623203554</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, M.Z. (2006) Description and Data Standard of Strawberry Germplasm Resources. Chinese Agri. Publishing House, Beijing, 56-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 640 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, W.M., Zhao, M.Z., Wang, Z.W., Qian, Y.M. and Yuan, J. (2009) The Study of the Irradiation Effect on Runner Plants of Strawberry with 60Co-Gamma Ray. VI International Strawberry Symposium, Vol. 842, 597-600.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.842.127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El oualkadi, A., Sbaghi, M. and Mouhib, M. (2018) Application of Mutagenic Radiation and Research the Optimal Doses of Induction of Bud Break and Vegetative Growth in the Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology, 3, 1028-1031.  
https://doi.org/10.22161/ijeab/3.3.40</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ponnusswani, V., Irulappan, I. and Arumugan, G. (1992) Sensitivity of Muscat Grape Cutting to Gamma Irradiation South India. Horticulture, 39, 317-318.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiwari, A.K. and Kumar, V. (2011) Gamma Ray Induced Morphological Changes in Pot Marigold (Calendula officinalis). Progressive Agriculture, 11, 99-02.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shukla, R., Nath, P., Jugran, H.M. and Gupta, M.N. (1986) Studies on Gamma Radiation of Rudbeckia laciniata cv. “Golden Glow”. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture and Biology, 15, 207-210.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, P.J., Ganapathi, T.R., Suprasanna, P. and Bapa, V.A. (2007) Effect of Single and Recurrent Gamma Irradiation on in Vitro Shoot Cultures of Banana. International Journal of Fruit Science, 7, 47-57.  
https://doi.org/10.1300/J492v07n01_05</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cambecedes, J., Duron, M., Decourtye, L. and Jalouzot, R. (1992) Methodology of In Vitro Irradiation from Lonicera Species, Mutant Description and Biochemical Characterization. Acta Horticulturae, 320, 119-126.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1992.320.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, S.M. (1997) Creation of Variability by Mutation and Tissue Culture for Improving Plants. Acta Horticulturae, 447, 69-77.  
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.447.6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Girisha, B.R. (1993) Breeding for Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guene) Resistance in Brinjal (S. Melongena L.) through Interspecific Hybridization and Mutation. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arunal, J., Prakash, M. and Sunil Kumar, B. (2010) Studies on Effect of Physical and Chemical Mutagens on Seedling Charecters in Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). International Journal of Current Research, 3, 38-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monica, S. and Seetharaman, N. (2015) Effect of Gamma Irradiation and Ems in M1 Generation of Garden Bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet var. Typicus cv. CO (GB) 14]. International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Studies, 2, 59-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velu, S., Mullainathan, L. and Arulbalachandran, D. (2012) Induced Morphological Variations in Cluster Bean (Cyamopsistetra gonoloba (L.) Taub). International Journal of Current Trends in Research, 1, 48-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonov, M., Velichov, P., Tsonev, T.S. and Angelov, M. (1989) Effect of Gamma and Laser Irradiation on Maize Seeds and Plants. ESNA, 20th Annual Meeting, Wageningen, 44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lage, L.S.C. and Esquibel, M.A. (1997) Growth Stimulation Produced by Methylene Blue Treatment in Sweet Potato. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 48, 77-81.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005767407230</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghiorghita, A.G.I., Toth, E.T. and Popescu, T.T. (1985) The Influence of Physiological Stage of Seeds at the Irradiation Moment on the Effects Induced by Small Doses of Gamma Rays 60Co in Triticum aestivum. Romanian Journal of Biology Series of Plant Biology, 30, 151-158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freidman, S.T. (1985) Pre-Sowing Radiation Stimulation of Crop Seeds. ESNA Newsletter, Warszawa, 126-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grossman, H.H. and Craig, R. (1982) The Effect of Gamma Irradiation of Seeds on Germination and Plant Morphology of Pelargonium hortorum L.H. Bailey. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Sciences, 107, 72-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Al-Oudat</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1990</year>)<article-title>Effect of Low Dose Gamma Irradiation on Onion Yield</article-title><source> Annals of Biology</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 61</fpage>-<lpage>67</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonov, M. (1985) Effect of Gamma Irradiation and Storage Duration of Maize Seeds on Certain Biochemical Changes in the Grain. Pasteniev. D. Nauki, 19-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mottram, J.C. (1913) On the Action of Beta and Gamma Rays of Radium on the Cell in Different States of Nuclear Division. Archives of Middlesex. Hospital, 30, 98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Regaud, C. (1923) About the Duration of Application in Brachytherapy and the Practical Value of Karyokinetics Index. Bulletin of the Association: France for the Study of Cancer, 12, 482.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strangeways, T.S.P. and Hopwood, F.L. (1926) The Effects of X-Rays upon Mitotic Cell Division in Tissue Cultures in Vitro. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 100, 283. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1926.0050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vintermberger, P. (1928) On Variations of Radiosensitivity during the First Segmentation Mitoses in the Egg of Rana fusca. Society Biology Report, 98, 532.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, S.M.L. (2011) Production Technology of Strawberry in Bangladesh. PhD Thesis, Department of Horticulture, BSMRAU, Salna, Gazipur, 49-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asrey, R. and Singh, R. (2004) Evaluation of Strawberry Varieties under Semi-Arid Irrigated Region in Punjab. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 61, 122-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pérez de Camacaro, M.E., Camacaro, G.J., Hadley, P., Battey, N.H. and Carew, J.G. (2002) Pattern of Growth and Development of the Strawberry Cultivars Elsanta, Bolero and Everest. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science, 127, 901-907. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.6.901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wi, S.G., Chung, B.Y. and Kim, J.S. (2007) Effects of Gamma Irradiation on Morphological Changes and Biological Responses in Plants. Micron, 38, 553-564.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2006.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Preussa, S.B. and Britta, A.B. (2003) A DNA-Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint. Arabidopsis. Genetics, 164, 323-334.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96142-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murti, R.H., Kim, H.Y. and Yeoung, Y.R. (2012) Morphological and Anatomiscal Characters of Ploidy Mutants of Strawberry. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14, 204-210.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>