<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1105852</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-96141</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Provider-Initiated Counselling and Testing Approach: 90-90-90 Goal Achievement. Kenya Referral General Hospital Assessment
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilunga</surname><given-names>Tshikele Anderson</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Banza</surname><given-names>Mwanabute</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Malulu</surname><given-names>Kabwe Djaile</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kayembe</surname><given-names>Mashika Anselme</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kampetenga</surname><given-names>Tshitenga Serges</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Umba</surname><given-names>Mbuzi Ambroise</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Matungulu</surname><given-names>Matungulu Charles</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mwarabu</surname><given-names>Much’apa Bienfait</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilunga</surname><given-names>Kandolo Simon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kabyla</surname><given-names>Ilunga Benjamin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Leprosis and Tuberculosis, Central Kongo, The Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>MD, MPH, Provincial Coordinator, HIV/AIDS, Kasai Province, The Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff6"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, The Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>School of Public Health, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, The Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Higher Institute of Medical Technique, Manono, The Democratic Republic of Congo</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>igher Institute of Medical Technique, Manono, The Democratic Republic of Congo
H</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Despite the prevention efforts of past decades, the prevalence of HIV infection continues to grow. An estimated 46 million people were living with HIV/AIDS worldwide by the end of 2005. The HIV pandemic has become a major public health and development problem around the world. Our goal is to contribute to the knowledge of serology status and early care. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study on the PITC approach. Our study covered 1140 cases detected at HGR Kenya from 01 January to 31 December 2018. The data were collected on the basis of the PITC register. 
  SPSS software version 23 was used for data analysis. Results: The male sex was more associated with positive serology (P-value: 0.0007), single men and married men were more likely to be infected than others. September had more new cases tested than the other months. The proportion of tested positive (141 peresonnes) is 12.3%. Of the 141 HIV positives, 100% were put on ART and among them 72.9% achieved suppression of viral charge (less than 1000 copies/ml of blood). Conclusion: PITC is necessary and should be systematically, at all gateways offered to all patients with an HIV risk factor, to boost testing and knowledge of HIV status, by combining Communication for behaviour change and Information Education and Communication through the communication channels adapted to the en-vironment, we mention churches, political mornings, youth movements, community relays.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PITC</kwd><kwd> HIV</kwd><kwd> Kenya</kwd><kwd> Referral</kwd><kwd> General Hospital</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). For more than 15 years, the HIV/AIDS pandemic has been raging around the world. Despite the prevention efforts of past decades, the prevalence of HIV infection continues to grow. An estimated 46 million people were living with HIV/AIDS worldwide by the end of 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref1">1</xref>]. The HIV pandemic has become a major public health and development problem around the world. Women and children as well as key populations are the most vulnerable targets.</p><p>In recent years, there has been a marked increase in global commitment and action against the HIV pandemic and a significant increase in the resources devoted to it. In June 2006, the United Nations General Assembly endorsed the continued expansion of HIV prevention, care and support with the aim of achieving as close as possible universal access to HIV here in 2030 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Despite recent progress, according to the UNAIDS report, 2019 is estimated around the world:</p><p>- 37.9 million [32.7 million - 44.0 million] people worldwide were living with HIV.</p><p>- 23.3 million [20.5 million - 24.3 million] people have access to treatment.</p><p>- 1.7 million [1.4 million - 2.3 million] people newly infected with HIV.</p><p>- 770,000 [570,000 - 1.1 million] people have died of AIDS-related illnesses.</p><p>In sub-Saharan Africa, at the end of 2016, about 36.7 million people were living with HIV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>The context of screening for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has evolved in response to new conditions of patient care and changes in screening policy. Screening for HIV infection is one of the major challenges in controlling the epidemic and plays a key role in optimizing the benefits of caring for people with the disease and controlling the epidemic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref4">4</xref>].</p><p>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a major public health and development challenge in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (EGPAF, 2016). At the end of 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that about 36.7 million people were living with HIV, including 25.6 million in the African region. HIV is transmitted through the exchange of various body fluids such as blood, breast milk, semen and vaginal secretions from infected persons. In children, vertical transmission (mother-child) of HIV is the main route of infection in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>It should be noted that the DRC conducted in 2017 a serosurveillance pass in 60 sites spread throughout the country. This survey gave the current seroprevalences of HIV/AIDS and syphilis among pregnant women aged 15 - 49 seen in the CPN services respectively 2.77% for HIV and 2.12% for syphilis.</p><p>Also, it should be noted, as part of the stratification of the response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic and STIs to achieve control of the HIV epidemic by the year 2020 and the Elimination of AIDS as a public health problem by 2030, the NAPS has embarked on the implementation of differentiated models based on the prioritization approach of HIV/AIDS intervention zones and STDs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref6">6</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>The study’s source population consists of all new cases received for consultation regardless of the reason and identified by the provider’s initiative (PITC) as well as voluntarily tested clients (VCT) at the General Hospital of Kenya.</p><p>The data were collected from the 2018PITC.</p><p>Our sampling is exhaustive and its size is 1140 HIV-tested clients at the Kenya general referral hospital for the duration of our study, from 01 January to 31 December 2018.</p><p>The collected data were encoded, entered with the Excel software, then processed and analyzed using the SPSS 23. Excel 2010 software was used to arrange tables and charts before being exported to Word.</p><p>Chi-square, OR and p-value were used as statistical tests.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The male sex is the majority with 53% against the female sex (47%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>I).</p><p>The median age is 34 years (&#177;15.9), the minimum age and the maximum age being respectively 1 and 85 years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>I).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>II shows that 80% of positive test respondents come from the Kenya Health District, compared to 18.4% from other Health Districts.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>I</label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sexe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>II</label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by source</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SITE</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >OUT THE SITE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >886</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(81.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(77.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >FROM THE SITE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(18.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(22.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The majority of respondents were screened in September, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>II).</p><p>Our survey shows that 51.8% of respondents infected with HIV/AIDS are believers in the Protestant church, 41.1% of Catholic believers, and 7.1% who do not belong to any religion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>III).</p><p>7039 new cases consulted, 1140 (16.2%) patients were tested for HIV against 5899 (83.8%) who were not (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>IV).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>V shows that 82.4% of the respondents were screened during PITC and 17.6% during the VCT.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VI shows that among the socio-professional categories surveyed infected by HIV/AIDS, housewives are more infected with a proportion of 46.8% against 9.9% of civil servants.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>III reveals that 88% of the screeners were seronegative, and 12% were HIV positive.</p><p>Sex is related to test result (P-value: 0.0007) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VII).</p><p>We observe that single respondents and married couples are much more likely to be infected with HIV than divorced (p &lt; 0.05), but there is no statistically significant relationship between widowed and divorced. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VIII).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>III</label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by source religion</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >RELIGION</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >460</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >518</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(41.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(46.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(51.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Without Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(7.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>IV</label><caption><title> Distribution of patients consulted and screened for HIV</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Patient having been tested</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequencies</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>V</label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by screening mode</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SCREENING MODE</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >VCT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201 (17.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(17.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(82.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >PITC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >939 (82.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(11.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(88.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VI</label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by occupation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >PROFESSION</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >TOTAL</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servants</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (9.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95 (9.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 (46.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261 (26.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jobless</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (21.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352 (35.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liberal sector</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (22%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291 (29.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >322</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VII</label><caption><title> Association between sex and HIV test outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SEX</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Chi2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >451</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(60.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(45.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (39.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >548 (54.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VIII</label><caption><title> Association between marital status and HIV test outcome</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >MARITAL STATUS</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >RESULT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Chi2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >POSITIVE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NEGATIVE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >MARRIED</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >534</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(7.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(92.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SINGLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >17,1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.0000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(23.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(76.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >WIDOWER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(12.0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(88.0%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >DIVORCED</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(34.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(65.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>This chart shows that among the 7039 cases received in medical consultations, 1140 clients were tested and 141 HIV positives or 34% were aware of their result test in care facilities and were all put on ART or 100%. Of these, 140 were able to access viral test 6 months after treatment. And out of 140 PLHIV, 102 reached the suppression of the viral load or 72.9% at a threshold of less than 1000 copies/ml (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>IV).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>I indicates that male sex is the majority with 53% against the female sex (47%). Our results are different from those found in a study on voluntary HIV testing among children under 15 in four VCT community centres in four health District in the Lubumbashi city of DRC (Lubumbashi, Ruashi, Kampemba and of Kenya) where the female sex was predominant (52%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref7">7</xref>]. They are also different from those found by Clouse in South Africa where female patients were in the majority (66.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>In 56% of the cases, respondents aged between 25 and 49 years were in the majority with a median age of 34 (&#177;15.9), the minimum age and the maximum age being respectively 1 and 85 years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>I). MWISONGO found that the age of the respondents between 25 and 35 years represented 50% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref9">9</xref>]. In South Africa, the age group between 18 and 29 years was in the majority (39.5%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>In 80% of the cases, the positive test came from the Kenya Health District, compared to 18.4% from other Health districts (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>II). In Zimbabwe, a study showed a significant link between positive serology to HIV and off-site residents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>The majority of respondents were screened in September (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>II) (58%). Our results are different from those of the Usaid report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref11">11</xref>] where the percentage of clients who benefited from PITC in a HGR of Upper Katanga following the initiation of the PITC to new gateways from January to June 2016 reveals that the month of June recorded more cases of screening (50.2%), followed by May (26.8%) while the low screening rate was observed in January (7.4%).</p><p>Our survey shows that 51.8% of respondents infected with HIV/AIDS are believers in the Protestant church, 41.1% of Catholic believers, and 7.1% who do not belong to any religion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>III). DZAH et al. found that in Ghana, Christians accounted for 94.6%, Muslim 5.1% and 0.3% are animists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref12">12</xref>]. Muslims were also in the majority in Sami’s study in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>IV reveals that 82.4% of the surveyed were screened by PITC with a seropositivity of 11.3% and 17.6% by VCT. Our results are different from those in Zimbabwe where the detection rate by provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) was 21.7% with a seropositivity of 0.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref10">10</xref>]. In Botswana, a survey shows that 81% of the participants are extremely favourable to PITC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref14">14</xref>]</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VI shows that among the socio-professional categories surveyed infected by HIV/AIDS, housewives are more infected with a proportion of 46.8% against 9.9% of civil servants. In Ethiopia, government officials were more exposed (OR2.7, 95% CI: 4.5 - 14.4) to HIV infection than other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>Seroprevalence in our series was 12% were seropositive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>III). In a study conducted in Durban (South Africa), Ramirez-Avila reported a seroprevalence of 17% (95% CI: 11% - 25%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref15">15</xref>].</p><p>In Harare (Zimbabwe), Bandasona found a low seroprevalence of 2.7% (95% CI: 2.2% - 3.1%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Sex is related to the test result (P-value: 0.0007). The male sex was 11.4 times related to the seropositivity due to HIV than the female sex (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VII). Our results are contrary to those of Sami [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref13">13</xref>] who did not find a statistically significant relationship between sex and seropositivity (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.75 - 1.6).</p><p>We observe that single respondents and married couples are much more likely to be infected with HIV than divorced (p &lt; 0.05), but there is no statistically significant relationship between widowed and divorced (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>VIII). Our results meet those found by Sami [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref13">13</xref>] in Ethiopia, where married women were more likely to be infected than others (OR2, 9 and CI 1.5 - 5.5). In South Africa, Bassett found that unmarried men were at highest risk for HIV [odds ratio (OR) 6.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.45 to 23.55], followed by unmarried women (OR 5.90, 95% CI 3.25 to 10.70) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Antiretroviral Therapy Cascade and Targets 90-90-90</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>IV shows that among the 7039 cases received in medical consultations, 1140 clients were tested and 141 people living with HIV or 34% were aware of their serostatus in care facilities and were all put on ART or 100%. Of these, 140 were able to access viral load 6 months after treatment. And out of 140 people living with HIV, 102 reached the suppression of the viral load or 72.9% at a threshold of less than 1000 copies/ml.</p><p>Our results are different from those of Adawaye, Aubry, Kalla and Kampo et al. who found that the proportion of detectable plasma viral charge (90.6%) was higher in patients on ART for 7 to 12 months than in those under treatment for 6 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96141-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study of 1140 patients screened (VCT, PITC) at the Kenya General hospital from 01 January to 31 December 2018. 1140 individuals were included in our study. A total of 7039 new cases in consultation were reported during our study, which gives a test acceptability rate equal to 16.2% and a seropositivity of 12.3% with 75.2% screened by PITC.</p><p>The male sex was the majority (53%) and September saw more new cases (57.9%).</p><p>The CDV approach has shown its limitations in that it has not made it possible to reach a large number of the screened patients at the end of an early start on anti-retroviral treatment. Hence, to achieve the UN/AIDS 90-90-90 goals by 2020, the PITC approach was introduced to boost testing and knowledge of HIV status in health facilities by 9% of new cases across all the entrance doors. Good counseling is essential to further persuade patients to accept this IPPC approach.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Anderson, I.T., Mwanabute, B., Djaile, M.K., Anselme, K.M., Serges, K.T., Ambroise, U.M., Charles, M.M., Bienfait, M.M., Simon, I.K. and Benjamin, K.I. (2019) Provider-Initiated Counsel- ling and Testing Approach: 90-90-90 Goal Achievement. Kenya Referral General Hos- pital Assessment. Open Access Library Jour- nal, 6: e5852. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105852</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96141-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OMS (1998) Elargir la riposte mondiale au VIH SIDA pour une action mieux dirigée. 1-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2007) Guide du conseil et du dépistage du VIH à l’initiative du soignant dans les établissements de santé.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ONUSIDA (2018) Statistiques mondiales sur le Vih en 2018.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carole</surname><given-names> E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Rapport ONUSIDA sur l’épidémie mondiale de sida 2013</article-title><source> Onusida</source><volume> 26</volume>,<fpage> 22</fpage>-<lpage>23</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EGPAF (2016) Disclosure of HIV Status Toolkit for Pediatric and Adolescent Populations. Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PNLS (2019) PNLS: Rapport Annul 2018. RDC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dieudonné, M., Olivier, T.-N., Francoise, L.-N., Oscar, M.-K., Jean-Baptiste, K.S. and Stanis, O.-W. (2017) Séroprévalence et facteurs associés à l’acceptation du Conseil et Dépistage Volontaire du VIH chez l’enfant à Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo Seroprevalence. Pan African Medical Journal, 8688, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clouse, K., Hanrahan, C.F., Bassett, J., Fox, M.P., Sanne, I. and Van Rie, A. (2014) Impact of Systematic HIV Testing on Case Finding and Retention in Care at a Primary Care Clinic in South Africa. Tropical Medicine &amp; International Health, 19, 1411-1419. https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.12387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mwisongo, A., Mehlomakhulu, V., Mohlabane, N., Peltzer, K., Mthembu, J. and Van Rooyen, H. (2015) Evaluation of the HIV Lay Counselling and Testing Profession in South Africa. BMC Health Services Research, 15, Article No. 278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0940-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bochner, A.F., et al. (2019) Strengthening Provider-Initiated Testing and Counselling in Zimbabwe by Deploying Supplemental Providers: A Time Series Analysis. BMC Health Services Research, 19, Article No. 351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4169-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Usaid (2016) Amélioration de la qualité des soins et traitement hiv/sida en république démocratique du Congo (RDC). Paquet des changements expérimentés par les équipes d’amélioration de la qualité du collaboratif VIH/sida en RDC fy15-16. Projet de l’Application de la.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dzah, S.M., Tarkang, E.E., Lutala, P.M., Sciences, B., Sciences, A. and Tarkang, E. (2014) Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding HIV/AIDS among Senior High School Students in Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis, Ghana. African Journal of Primary Health Care &amp; Family Medicine, 11, e1-e11. https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdurahman, S., Seyoum, B., Oljira, L. and Weldegebreal, F. (2015) Factors Affecting Acceptance of Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counseling Services among Outpatient Clients in Selected Health Facilities in Harar Town, Eastern Ethiopia. HIV/AIDS, 7, 157-165. https://doi.org/10.2147/HIV.S81649</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiser, S., Heisler, M., Leiter, K., Percy-de Korte, F., Tlou, S. and DeMonner, S. (2006) Routine HIV Testing in Botswana: A Population-Based Study on Attitudes, Practices, and Human Rights Concerns. PLOS Medicine, 3, 261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lynn, R.-A., Farzad, N., Deirdre, S., Siphesihle, P. and Janet, G. (2014) The Acceptability and Feasibility of Routine Pediatric HIV Testing in an Outpatient Clinic in Durban, South Africa. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 32, 1348-1353. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e31829ba34b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bandason, T., et al. (2013) Burden of HIV among Primary School Children and Feasibility of Primary School-Linked HIV Testing in Harare, Zimbabwe: A Mixed Methods Study. AIDS Care, 25, 1520-1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.780120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bassett, I.V., et al. (2008) Routine, Voluntary HIV Testing in Durban, South Africa: Correlates of HIV Infection. HIV Medicine, 9, 863-867. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00635.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adawaye, C. (2014) Nouvelles approches genotypiques pour le monitoring de resistance du VIH aux ARV dans les pays à ressources limités.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aubry</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Infection par le VIH/SIDA et tropique</article-title><source> Médecine Tropicale</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>4</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalla, G., Assoumou, M.O., Kangaing, N., Monebenimp, F. and Mpopi, F. (2015) Impact du traitement antiretroviral sur le profil biologique des enfants VIH positifs suivis au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Yaoundé au Cameroun. Pan African Medical Journal, 20, 159. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.20.159.4677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96141-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kampo, D. (2014) Bases moléculaires de la resistance de VIH-1 de sous-types non B aux nouveaux antiretroviraux (phdthesis). Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, VI.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>