<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2019.1010134</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-96135</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Plant Growth Hormones and Liquid Fertilizer on Rooting and Tuberization of Yam (&lt;i&gt;Dioscorea rotundata&lt;/i&gt; Poir.) Vine Cuttings
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dibi</surname><given-names>Konan Evrard Brice</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouakou</surname><given-names>Amani Michel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amari</surname><given-names>Ler-Ogn Dadé Georges Elisée</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brouth</surname><given-names>Lorng Jean Bernard</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dossou-Aminon</surname><given-names>Innocent</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Essis</surname><given-names>Brice Sidoine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N’zue</surname><given-names>Boni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dick</surname><given-names>Acka Emmanuel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Root and Tuber Crops Program, Food Crops Research Station, National Centre for Agronomic Research-CNRA, Bouake, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Faculty of Science and Technology of Dassa, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Biosciences Training and Research Unit, Felix Houphouet-Boigny University, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1903</fpage><lpage>1920</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Vine cutting is an effective solution to solve the problem of seed availability in yam cultivation. This study was conducted to improve the recovery and rooting rate of vine cuttings of 
  Dioscorea 
  rotundata
  . Two-node cuttings from five (5)
  -
  month-old hybrid plants were grown in liquid media consisting of phytohormones (AIA<sub>3</sub> and GA<sub>3</sub>) and liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8) at different concentrations. Observations were made weekly from the 21st day after transplanting and focused on the survival rate of the cuttings, the number of roots emitted and the number of minitubers initiated. The results obtained showed a significant effect of the different growing media on the survival rate, rooting and production of minitubers. The best survival rates were obtained for cuttings grown in NPK (8-8-8) at 0.25% (100%) and AIA<sub>3</sub> at 25 ppm (93.3%). The highest average
  s
   root number w
  as
   recorded with growing media containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 (20.3) and 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> (17.7). Growing media with 0.25% NPK (8-8-8) and 25 ppm AIA<sub>3 </sub>provided the highest average numbers of minitubers initiated, respectively 5 and 4.6. Growing medium containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 has been identified as the one that allows better roots emission and minitubers production by yam vines cuttings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Yam</kwd><kwd> Vine Cutting</kwd><kwd> Yam Seed</kwd><kwd> Growing Medium</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Dioscorea rotundata&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Yam (Dioscorea spp.) of the Dioscoreaceae family, is a tuber crop with high nutritional, economic and socio-cultural importance in the tropical world and especially in West Africa where more than 90% of world production is recorded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref3">3</xref>]. In this region of Africa, yam trade accounts for about 32% of farmers’ income [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref4">4</xref>]. It is a financial source for a significant portion of small producers, especially women, who are mainly involved in production, processing and marketing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, yam is the leading food crop with an estimated production of more than 7.148 million tons in 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref4">4</xref>]. It is the staple food for more than 56% of the Ivorian rural population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref6">6</xref>]. It is consumed in several forms: boiled, crushed, stewed, roasted and fried. Two species contribute mainly to production: Dioscorea rotundata, a species native to West Africa and Dioscorea alata native to Southeast Asia and introduced into Africa during the 16th century [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Yam tubers are intended for two types of use. They can be directly consumed or used as planting material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref10">10</xref>]. Yam is mainly vegetatively propagated using whole tubers or different portions of tubers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref12">12</xref>]. This vegetative propagation technique has the disadvantage that a significant portion of the harvest is saved as seed for new cultivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref13">13</xref>]. This reduces the proportion of production available for food. On average, it is estimated that 25% to 50% of the yam harvest is converted back into seed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>The availability and cost of yam seeds have thus been identified as a major limiting factor for the expansion of yam cultivation. Indeed, yam seeds are not only expensive, but also scarce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref17">17</xref>]. They represent 40% to 60% of the total variable cost of yam production and are also bulky [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref20">20</xref>]. These constraints are attributed to the relatively low multiplication rate of yams, which varies from 4 to 8, as opposed to 300 for cereals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>In addition, the increase in demographic and land tenure pressure in C&#244;te d’Ivoire is leading to a very high demand for yam seeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref23">23</xref>]. It is, therefore, necessary to reduce the pressure due to the demand for seed on ware yams and to solve the seed shortage caused by the consumption of tubers. Thus, other methods of yam propagation that do not require the use of tubers or a large quantity of tubers are necessary.</p><p>Yam vine cuttings to obtain seeds are a promising alternative [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref12">12</xref>]. This technique has been tested with some success with D. alata and D. rotundata. Survival rates of 30% to 80% and average numbers of minitubers of 0.5 to 2 have been recorded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref24">24</xref>]. However, the survival rate, rooting and production of minitubers remain generally low and unstable for D. rotundata, the most popular and commercialized species in Africa. These rates have varied from 40% to 80% on low soil or carbonized rice husk environments and are not under control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref26">26</xref>]. The aeroponics method that gives better results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref11">11</xref>] requires the use of advanced equipment that everyone cannot afford. However, a simple nursery phase in a liquid nutrient medium could significantly increase the survival rates of cuttings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref27">27</xref>]. To improve the rooting of yam vine cuttings, some works with varying results have been carried out using auxins or synthetic hormones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref29">29</xref>], natural hormones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref31">31</xref>] and inorganic fertilizer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>].</p><p>The objective of this study is to develop a simple and effective technique for D. rotundata yams vine cuttings. Specifically, the effect of two types of phytohormones (Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Gibberellic Acid) and a liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8) on the survival rate, rooting and tuberization of vine cuttings are tested.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The work was carried out at the Food Crops Research Station (SRCV) of the National Center for Agronomic Research (CNRA) located in Bouake in central C&#244;te d’Ivoire (7˚46' north latitude, 5˚06' west longitude and 376 m of altitude). The climate in the study area is tropical, humid and bimodal with two rainy seasons (March-June and September-October) and two dry seasons (November February and July-August). The average annual rainfall is between 700 and 1100 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref33">33</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Plant Material</title><p>The plant material consisted of vine cuttings of yam hybrids of the species Dioscorea rotundata. The plants are derived from the germination of seeds obtained from intraspecific crossbreeding at the Food Crops Research Station (SRCV).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Establishment</title><p>The experiment was carried out in a room in 250 ml glass jars placed on a workbench. The jars containing the growing media were arranged in a complete randomized block system with 3 replicates and 37 treatments. The treatments consist of the different liquid growing media tested (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). They are represented by 3 jars containing a medium and constituting the elementary plot. Five (5) cuttings were transplanted per jar, for a total of 15 cuttings per medium (treatment) and per repetition.</p><p>The jars were placed in the room under a 12-hour photoperiod at a temperature between 24˚C and 28˚C and a relative humidity between 60% and 62%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Growing Media</title><p>Hormonal solutions of Indole-3-Acetic Acid (AIA<sub>3</sub>) and Gibberellic Acid (GA<sub>3</sub>) were each prepared at the initial concentration of 100 ppm. Daughter solutions of different concentrations: 25; 50 and 75 ppm for AIA<sub>3</sub> and 2.5; 5 and 7.5 ppm for GA<sub>3</sub> were obtained after diluting the stock solutions in distilled water.</p><p>Three doses of a liquid fertilizer NPK (8-8-8) at 0.25; 0.50% and 0.75% were obtained by diluting 2.5; 5 and 7.5 ml of the fertilizer product in a final volume of 1l distilled water.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Growing media and their composition</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Composition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="9"  >Simple growing media (AIA<sub>3</sub>; GA<sub>3</sub>; NPK 8-8-8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25% NPK (8-8-8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5% NPK (8-8-8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75% NPK (8-8-8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="28"  >Composed growing media (AIA<sub>3</sub> + GA<sub>3</sub> + NPK (8-8-8))</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3 </sub>+ 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Hormonal solutions (25; 50 and 75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>; 2.5; 5 and 7.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub>) and doses of NPK 8-8-8 (0.25%; 0.50% and 0.75%) were put separately in jars to form different simple growing media. Growing media composed of mixtures of the different concentrations of hormonal solutions with the doses of liquid fertilizer, have also been developed. Each jar contained 125 ml of the final growing medium solution (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Sampling, Preparation and Transplanting of Cuttings</title><p>Vine cuttings with two nodes were collected with scissors from five (5) month old yam hybrids of D. rotundata growing in a screen house. They were soaked in water during transportation to the growing room to avoid dehydration. Seventy five percent (75%) of the cuttings were stripped of their leaves to reduce leaf transpiration. One of the leaves at the top was left in place to allow breathing and photosynthetic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref34">34</xref>]. The transplanting was carried out by plunging the basal part (basal node) of the cuttings into the different growing media contained in the glass jars.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Collection</title><p>Observations and measurements were made weekly from the 21st day after transplanting. They focused on the survival rate of vine cuttings, the number of roots emitted (primary and secondary roots) and the number of minitubers initiated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The one-factor analysis of variance was performed using STATISTICA version 7.1 software. The Newman-Keuls mean comparison test was applied at the 5% threshold in cases significant effects were observed between treatments.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The results recorded concern the survival rate and the number of roots and minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in the different growing media (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effects of Different Growing Media on the Survival Rate of Cuttings</title><p>For media containing AIA<sub>3</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), the highest survival rate value was 93.3%. It was recorded with the growing medium containing the lowest concentration of AIA<sub>3</sub> (A1 = 25 ppm). This rate is significantly different (p = 0.00) from those recorded with media with concentrations (A2 and A3) of 0; 50 and 75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>. For these concentrations, the exercise rates are 40%, 73.3% and 60% respectively. No significant differences were noted between media at 50 and 75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>The highest average survival rate for GA<sub>3</sub>-based media was 60% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). It was obtained with the lowest concentration (G1) which is 2.5 ppm. This survival rate is about the double and significantly different (p = 0.00) from those of cuttings grown in media (G2 and G3) containing 5 and 7.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> as well as in the control medium containing only water (C).</p><p>For media containing liquid fertilizer NPK 8-8-8 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), a significant effect (p = 0.01) was also observed between them. The lowest dose of liquid fertilizer (D1) of 0.25% resulted in a 100% survival rate. With media D2 and D3 containing 0.5% and 0.75% respectively, the survival rates were lower (60%).</p><p>The average survival rates of cuttings are significantly different in growing media composed of combinations of hormonal solutions (AIA<sub>3</sub> and GA<sub>3</sub>) and liquid fertilizer NPK 8-8-8 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Growing media B2 (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK), B11 (50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8) and B22 (75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25% NPK 8-8-8) showed the highest survival rates of 66.6%; 62.4% and 60.0% respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effects of Different Growing Media on Root Emission of Cuttings</title><p>The average number of roots assessed 21 days after transplanting the cuttings was higher (11.7) with the medium containing the lowest dose of AIA<sub>3</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) which was 25 ppm (A1). At this date, treatments A2 (50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>), A3 (75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>) and the control (C = without auxin) have induced 6, 4 and 3.3 roots per cuttings respectively. Subsequently, root numbers increased in all media. The values recorded 35 days after transplanting the cuttings were 17.7, 14, 10.3 and 6.7 respectively for growing media A1, A2, A3 and the control.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Survival rates means of vine cuttings in growing media consisting of mixtures of hormonal solutions (AIA<sub>3</sub> and GA<sub>3</sub>) and liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Composition</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Survival rates means (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.6a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0cde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.4a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6cde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA3 + 7.5 GA3 + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0e</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.6bcde</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Survival rates means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p><p>The growing medium with the lowest concentration of gibberellin G1 (2.5 ppm of GA<sub>3</sub>) and the control medium without this hormone induced the highest mean root numbers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). For these media, the values increased from 5.3 and 4 respectively on the 21st day after transplanting the cuttings to 6.3 on the 35th day. In other respects, the lowest average numbers of roots emitted by yam cuttings were recorded in the case of G2 (5 ppm of GA<sub>3</sub>) and G3 (7.5 ppm of GA<sub>3</sub>) treatments. For the latter media, the values ranged from 2.7 to 4 and 1.3 to 3 roots on average from day 21 to day 35 after transplanting.</p><p>Between the 21st and 35th days after transplanting the cuttings, the average number of roots formed varied from 12 to 20.3 in medium D1 (0.25% NPK) and from 9.3 to 17.7 on average in medium D2 (0.5% NPK) and D3 (0.75% NPK). The average number of roots of cuttings in water (control) increased from 4 to 6.3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>For the combination of the 3 products, 21 days after transplanting, yam vine cuttings emitted a greater number of roots in B2 medium (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8) than in other combined media (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). However, on average 7.5 and 6.5 roots were emitted by the cuttings respectively in the media B11 (50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8) and B22 (75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25% NPK 8-8-8). On the thirty-fifth day after transplanting, the highest numbers of roots emitted by cuttings were 16.5 in B2 medium (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8) and 9.5 in B3 medium (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75% NPK 8-8-8) and B22 (75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25% NPK 8-8-8).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Roots numbers means observed on yam vine cuttings at different dates after transplanting into growing media consisting of mixtures of hormonal solutions (AIA<sub>3</sub> and GA<sub>3</sub>) and liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Compositions</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Number of roots</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Days after transplanting</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5abc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5bc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >0.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Roots numbers means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effects of Different Growing Media on the Number of Minitubers Initiated</title><p>Cuttings transplanted into growing media containing 25 and 50 ppm of AIA<sub>3</sub> initiated on average 4.6 and 3.6 minitubers respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). These numbers of minitubers are the double of those initiated in growing media containing 75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> and in the control medium.</p><p>On media containing GA<sub>3</sub>, there was no significant difference for the production of minitubers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Indeed, cuttings grown in media containing 2.5 and 5 ppm of GA<sub>3</sub> produced an average of one (01) minitubert. Cuttings grown in the medium containing 7.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> and in the control medium did not produce any minituber.</p><p>The average numbers of minitubers produced by the cuttings are significantly different between growing media containing different doses of liquid fertilizer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The largest numbers of minitubers were produced in media D1 at 0.25% NPK (5.0 &#177; 0.0) and D3 at 0.75% NPK (4.0 &#177; 1.1). Cuttings grown in medium D2 containing 0.5% NPK produced an average of 3.3 &#177; 0.3 minitubers. The cuttings did not produce any minitubers in the water control medium.</p><p>A significant difference (p = 0.00) is noted between the different growing media containing a mixture of the three (3) types of elements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). The average number of minitubers (3.0 &#177; 0.0) obtained in B2 medium (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8) was the highest. The cuttings transplanted into the B6 medium (25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75% NPK 8-8-8), had an average number of minitubers of 2.0 &#177; 0.5. The other combinations of media produced one or no minitubers.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Number of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in growing media containing different concentrations of indole-3-acetic acid (AIA<sub>3</sub>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compositions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of minitubers initiated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#177; 0.3a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.6a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,6 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Minitubers numbers means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Number of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in growing media containing different concentrations of gibberellic acid (GA<sub>3</sub>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compositions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of minitubers initiated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Minitubers numbers means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Number of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in growing media containing different concentrations of liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compositions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of minitubers initiated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25% NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5% NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 0.3ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75% NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0 &#177; 1.1a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Minitubers numbers means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Number of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in growing media consisting of mixtures of hormonal solutions (AIA<sub>3</sub> and GA<sub>3</sub>) and liquid fertilizer (NPK 8-8-8)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growing media</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compositions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of minitubers initiated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 &#177; 0.0a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 1.3ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 &#177; 0.5ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 1.3ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 &#177; 0.8ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 + 0.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.5b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 2.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#177; 0.6ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.25 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.3ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 AIA<sub>3</sub> + 7.5 GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.75 NPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#177; 0.0ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 &#177; 0.0b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Minitubers numbers means followed by the same letter in a column are not significantly different at a probability threshold of 5%, according to the Newman-Keuls mean comparison test.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Among all the growing media tested, the best survival rates of Dioscorea rotundata vine cuttings were obtained in media containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 (100%), 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> (93.3%), 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK (66.6%) and 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> (60%). It appears that the survival rates in media containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 and 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> respectively are higher than those obtained by Igwilo (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref35">35</xref>] and Dibi et al. (2014) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref25">25</xref>] on solid media consisting of coarse construction sand and carbonized rice husks. Indeed, these authors reported survival rates of 71% and 68% respectively. In addition, AIA<sub>3</sub> favoured root development in D. rotundata vine cuttings. Indole-3 acetic acid (AIA<sub>3</sub>) is an auxin which is a plant growth hormone essential for plant development. Also known as cuttings hormone, auxin acts at a high concentration (between 10-8 and 10-3 g&#183;L<sup>−1</sup>) on rhizogenesis, promoting the appearance of roots on cuttings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref36">36</xref>]. The liquid growing medium containing mineral elements such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) at a rate of 0.25% favored the survival of vine cuttings of Dioscorea rotundata. In fact, the positive action of mineral elements on the development of yam vine cuttings has been reported by several authors. According to Otoo et al. (2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref22">22</xref>], in general, improving the nutritional status of mother plants through nutrient supplementation (NPK 15-25-8) before cutting vines has improved survival rates by more than 16% and ensures good subsequent development of minitubers. It has also been found that spraying urea on vine cuttings of Dioscorea alata facilitates rooting, increases the size of the minitubers and increases the number of roots per cut; but the survival rate decreases with increasing urea concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>]. The average survival rate of vine cuttings in the growing medium containing 2.5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> (60%) is similar to that obtained by Behera et al. (2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>]. These authors obtained survival rates of 60.02% for Dioscorea alata vine cuttings when dipped in a solution containing 10 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> followed by NPK (100-100-100) on a solid medium consisting of a mixture of sand and cow dung.</p><p>The rooting is an essential parameter in the management of cuttings. It is observed 15 days to 3 weeks on average after transplanting vine cuttings of the species D. rotundata and D. cayenensis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref37">37</xref>]. This is confirmed by Ayankanmi et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref38">38</xref>] who found the formation of roots of vine cuttings from two clones of D. rotundata three weeks after transplanting onto a medium containing sand. In addition, Igwilo (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref35">35</xref>] reported that after 14 days, cuttings of the Obiaoturugo variety (D. rotundata) showed a high rooting rate. In our study, the highest mean root number was recorded with growing media containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 (20.3), 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> (17.7) and mixed media 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK (16.5). These environments favored the increase in the number of roots from the 21st day to the 35th day. These average numbers of roots of cuttings are similar to those obtained by other authors. Work by Acha et al. (2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref28">28</xref>] showed that auxin (AIA<sub>3</sub>) induced an increase in the number of roots of vine cuttings of 10 cultivars of D. rotundata from 15 to 30 days after transplanting. It induces the formation of new roots by overcoming root apical dominance resulting from the cytokinin effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref39">39</xref>]. Behera et al. (2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>] showed that treatment with 2% urea increased the number of roots per cut (38.16%) on the 20th day after transplanting. The results obtained in our study corroborate those of Igwilo (2003) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref35">35</xref>]. According to these authors, the use of a hormonal solution composed by 50 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>, 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> and 10 ppm Benzyladenin increases the number of roots per vine cuttings of D. rotundata. However, the average number of roots of cuttings in GA<sub>3</sub>-based growing media would be lower than that of the control because the concentrations of GA<sub>3</sub> used would appear low to induce an increase in the number or growth of roots. However, the root numbers obtained with 2.5 ppm gibberellic acid are higher than those obtained by Behera et al. (2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>] who found that with 1 ppm GA<sub>3</sub>, the root number per cut can be improved.</p><p>The average numbers of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings in the different growing media at 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub>, 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 and the medium containing 25 ppm AIA<sub>3</sub> + 5 ppm GA<sub>3</sub> + 0.5% NPK 8-8-8 are 4.6 &#177; 0.3 ; 5.0 &#177; 0.0 and 3.3 &#177; 0.0 respectively. These numbers of minitubers obtained are higher than those reported by Dibi et al. (2014) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref25">25</xref>] which were 1.03 &#177; 0.3 and 1.73 &#177; 0.86. Ayankanmi et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref38">38</xref>] also obtained poorer results on a rice husk-based growing medium with 0.6 and 0.7 per cut. These differences could be due to the types of media used. The nutrient richness of the medium, its texture and structure influence the formation and development of minitubers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref22">22</xref>]. In this study, liquid media were fortified with growth hormones and nutrients, while most authors used solid media based on soil and carbonized rice husks. GA<sub>3</sub> growing media produced very little or no minitubers. No significant differences were observed between the numbers of minitubers initiated by cuttings in GA<sub>3</sub>. Our results are in line with those of Kefi et al. (1995) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref40">40</xref>] who reported that gibberellic acid inhibits tuberization in yams. This is confirmed by Behera et al. (2009) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref32">32</xref>] who found no significant difference between the numbers of minitubers initiated by vine cuttings treated with different concentrations of gibberellic acid.</p><p>The nature and age of the mother plants of the cuttings used could also explain the differences in results observed from one experimenter to another [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref24">24</xref>]. In this study, vine cuttings were collected from seedlings of 5-month-old grown in a screen house. Other authors have used vitro-plants as mother plants or yam plants grown in the field, whose age varied from 2 to 5 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96135-ref38">38</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The growing media used in this work produced average survival rates of Dioscorea rotundata vine cuttings between 60% and 100% and average root numbers between 5.3 and 17.7. Growing medium containing 0.25% NPK 8-8-8 has been identified as the one that allows better survival rate, root emission and minituber production by yam vine cuttings. As this nutrient compound is cheaper and more accessible, it is possible to improve the survival rate and rooting of vine cuttings that will allow the production of yam seeds without the use of tubers. However, for the standardization of this technic for yam vine cuttings, further studies will have to be carried out, including the definition of the stage and conditions for transplanting vine cuttings from the nursery room to the field.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the National Centre for Agronomic Research (CNRA-C&#244;te d’Ivoire) for facilities to operate the research. They are also thankful to Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation who funded this study through “AfricaYam Project”. CNRA research technicians, involved in the project are acknowledged. They thank International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) for the partnership.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Brice, D.K.E., Michel, K.A., Elis&#233;e, A.L.-O.D.G., Bernard, B.L.J., Innocent, D.-A., Sidoine, E.B., Boni, N. and Emmanuel, D.A. (2019) Effect of Plant Growth Hormones and Liquid Fertilizer on Rooting and Tuberization of Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.) Vine Cuttings. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 1903-1920. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.1010134</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96135-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharjee, R., Gedil, M., Sartie, A., Otoo, E., Dumet, D., Kikuno, H. and Asiedu, R. (2011) Dioscorea. In: Kole, C., Ed., Wild Crop Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources: Industrial Crops, Springer, Berlin, 71-96.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21102-7_4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denis, C. (2015) Influence des premiers stades de croissance sur la variabilité du rendement parcellaire de deux espèces d’igname (Dioscorea spp.) cultivées en Afrique de l’Ouest. Sciences agronomiques et écologiques, Thèse de Doctorat de l’Institut des Sciences et Industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement, Paris, 174 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faostat (2019) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2019. Production: Crops. http://faostat.fao.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chukwu, G.O. and Ikwelle, M.C. (2000) Yam: Threats to Its Sustainability in Nigeria. In: Palawija News: The CGPRT Centre Newsletter, Vol. 17, the Centre, 20-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asiedu, R. (2003) Yam in West Africa: Production and Collaborative Research. Agronomie Africaine, Numéro Special, 4, 173-176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EASA (2009) Evaluation approfondie de la sécurité alimentaire EASA des ménages ruraux en Cote d’Ivoire. Ministère de L’Agriculture, Octobre 2009.  
http://www.ins.ci/n/templates/docss/secualim_ruraux.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayensu, E.S. and Coursey, D. (1972) Guinea Yams. The Botany, Ethnobotany, Use and Possible Future of Yams in West Africa. Economy and Botany, 26, 301-318.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860700</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doumbia, S., Touré, M. and Mahyao, A. (2006) Commercialisation de l’igname en Cote d’Ivoire: état actuel et perspectives d’évolution. Cahiers Agricultures, 15, 273-277.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doumbia, S., Koko, L. and Aman, S. (2014) L’Introduction et la diffusion de la variété d’igname C18 en région centre de Cote d’Ivoire. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 80, 7121-7130. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v80i1.2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craufurd, P., Battey, N., Ile, E. and Asiedu, R. (2006) Phases of Dormancy in Yam Tubers (Dioscorea rotundata). Annals of Botany, 97, 497-504.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aighewi, B.A., Asiedu, R., Maroya, N. and Balogun, M. (2015) Propagation Methods to Raise the Production of Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir). Food Security, 7, 823-834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0481-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dibi, K.E.B., Kouakou, A.M., Camara, B., N’zué, B. and Zohouri, G.P. (2016) Inventaire des méthodes de production de semenceaux d’igname (Dioscorea spp): Une revue de la littérature. Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 29, 4496-4514.  
http://www.m.elewa.org/JAPS/2016/29.1/1.Dibi.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hahn, S.K. (1995) Yams: Dioscorea spp. (Dioscoreaceae). In: Smartt, J. and Simmonds, N.W., Eds., Evolution of Crop Plants, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, 112-120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okoli, O.O. and Akoroda, M.O. (1995) Providing Seed Tubers for the Production of Food Yams. African Journal of Root and Tuber Crops, 1, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hinvi, J.C. and Nonfon, R. (2000) La production et la commercialisation des semenceaux d’igname à Ouaké (Bénin): Une nécessité de plus en plus incontournable. In: Dans Ebet, A.W. and Djinandou, I.K., Eds., L’igname et la pomme de terre en Afrique de L’Ouest, Actes de séminaire, WASDU, Accra, 81-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiwachi, H., Kikuno, H. and Asiedu, R. (2005) Micro Tuber Production Using Yam (D. rotundata) Vines. Tropical Science, 45, 163-169.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ts.22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ironkwe, A.G., Asiedu, R. and Unamma, R.P. (2007) Adoption of Yam Minisett Technology by Women Farmers in Abia State, Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Research, 7, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasr.v7i2.2863</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nweke, F.I., Ugwu, B.O., Asadu, C.L.A. and Ay, P. (1991) Production Cost in the Yam Based Cropping Systems of Southeastern Nigeria. RCPM Research Monograph, No. 6. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, 29 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manyong, V.M., Asiedu, R. and Olaniyan, G.O. (2001) Farmers’ Perception of, and Actions on, Resource Management Constraints in the Yam Based Systems of Western Nigeria. Root Crops in the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops—Africa Branch, Cotonou, 11-17 October 1998, 156-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aighewi, B.A., Akoroda, M.O. and Asiedu, R. (2002) Seed Yam (D. rotundata, Poir) Production, Storage and Quality in Selected Yam Zones of Nigeria. African Journal of Root and Tuber Crops, 5, 20-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alvarez, M.N. and Hahn, S.K. (1984) Seed Yam Production. Tropical Root Crops: Production and Uses in Africa, Proceedings of 2nd Triennial Symposium of ISTRC-AB, Ottawa, 129-132.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otoo, E., Anyakanmi, T.G., Kikuno, H. and Asiedu, R. (2016) In Vivo Yam (Dioscorea spp.) Vine Multiplication Technique: The Plausible Solution to Seed Yam Generation Menace. Journal of Agricultural Science, 8, 76-86.  
https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v8n2p88</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dao, D. (2003) Transfert de technologie de conservation en milieu rural et étude économique de la filière igname dans un bassin de production au nord de la Cote d’Ivoire, cas de Dikodougou. Thèse de Doctorat unique, Université de Cocody, Abidjan, 136 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kikuno, H., Matsumoto, R., Shiwachi, H., Youohara, H. and Asiedu, R. (2007) Comparative Effects of Explants Sources and Age of Plant on Rooting, Shooting and Tuber Formation of Vine Cutting of Yams. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 51, 71-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dibi, K., Kouakou, A.M., Yéo, T.J., Fofana, I., N’Zué, B. and Brou, Y.C. (2014) Effects of Planting Modes on Yam (Dioscorea rotundata, Poir and Dioscorea alata L.) Vine Cuttings for Mini Tubers Production. International Journal of Sciences, 3, 1-8.  
https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/578</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gbadamosi, A.E., Ajayi, A.T. and Osekita, O.S. (2019) Vine Cutting Propagation in Four Varieties of Yam (Dioscorea Species) Using Different Planting Media. Ife Journal of Science, 21, 441-449. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijs.v21i2.17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellefontaine, R., Meunier, Q., Ichaou, A., Morin, A., Mapongmetsem, P.M., Belem, B., Azihou, F., Houngnon, A. and Abdourhamane, H. (2018) La régénération par graines et Par multiplication végétative à faible coot (drageons et boutures de segments de racine). CIRAD Montpellier, 463 p.  
https://agritrop.cirad.fr/587606/1/ID587606.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Acha, I.A., Shiwachi, H., Asiedu, R. and Akoroda, M.O. (2004) Effect of Auxins on Root Development in Yam (Dioscorea rotundata) Vine. Tropical Science, 44, 80-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ts.140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kikuno, H., Muamba, K., Shiwachi, H., Micho, O. and Asiedu, R. (2006) Minituber Production of Yam (D. rotundata) Using Vines. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 50, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agele, S.O., Ayankanmi, T.G. and Kikuno, H. (2010) Effects of Synthetic Hormone Substitutes and Genotypes on Rooting and Mini Tuber Production of Vines Cuttings Obtained from White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata, Poir). African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 4714-4724.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uyoh, E.A., Ita, E.E., Essien, M., Ewona, E.A.F. and Binang, M. (2016) Effect of Synthetic Hormone Substitutes on Rooting of Vine Cuttings in Water Yam (Dioscorea alata L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 7, 1372-1379.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.79130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Behera, K., Debashrita, P. and Sahoo, S. (2009) Effect of GA3 and Urea Treatments on Improvement of Microtuber Production and Productivity Material in Greater Yam (Dioscorea alata L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici, 37, 81-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akassimadou, E.F. and Yao-Kouamé, A. (2014) Caractéristiques morpho-pédologiques et potentiels d’un sol de bas-fond secondaire développé sur granito-gneiss en région de savane guinéenne (Centre de la Cote d’Ivoire). Journal of Applied Biosciences, 79, 6968-6982. https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v79i1.17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Behera, K., Sahoo, S., Trinanth, M. and Debashrita, P. (2009) Response of Vine Cuttings to Rooting in Different Months in Three Dioscorea Species. Nature and Science, 7, 48-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Igwilo, N. (2003) Presence of Axillary Bud and Application of Plant Growth Hormones on Rooting and Tuberization of Yam (Dioscorea spp) Vine Cuttings. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2, 128-130. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjass.v2i2.2222</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Madder, A., Devreese, B., Lusching, C., Friml, J. and Hilson, P. (2012) Secretory Peptides Regulate Auxin Carrier Turnover during Plant Gravitropic Responses. Developmental Cell, 22, 678-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.02.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buffard, M. and Touré, B. (1982) Multiplication des végétative par bouturage de cultivars appartenant au complexe Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata. Fonds documentaire, ORSTOM, 235-249.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayankami, T., Agele, S. and Kikuno, H. (2010) Effects of Synthetic Hormone Substitutes and Genotypes on Rooting and Mini Tuber Production of Vines Obtained from White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata, Poir). African Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 4714-4724.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonio, G. and Juan, C. (1996) Les hormones végétales. Pour la Science, 228, 42-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96135-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kefi, S., Read, P., Pavalista, A. and Kachman, S. (1995) The Effect of Different Concentration of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) and Kinetin on in Vitro Tuberization of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Horticultural Science, 30, 752-758.  
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.4.752C</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>