<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-1985</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oje.2019.911031</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJE-96127</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Relation Significance between Hydrological Residence Time and Phytoplankton Dynamics in Lake Kinneret (Israel)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moshe</surname><given-names>Gophen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Migal-Scientific Research Institute, Kiryat Shmone, Israel</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>479</fpage><lpage>492</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Long-term data record of Phytoplankton (Peridinium, Cyanophyta, Chlorophyta, Diatoms) dynamics in Lake Kinneret was evaluated comparatively with hydrological parameters. The hydrological features were found to be correlated with algal biomass distribution. Consequently, the best representor of the hydrological trait, Residence Time, is suggested to be a key parameter controlling algal dynamics.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Kinneret</kwd><kwd> Phytoplankton</kwd><kwd> Residence Time</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lake Kinneret and its watershed are a part of the Northern section of the Syrian-African great rift Valley. The Lake Kinneret Watershed area (2730 km<sup>2</sup>), is stretched between 32˚40' and 33˚38' North, 110 km long N-S axis. The Kinneret drainage basin has a high altitude gradient: from +2814 (masl) to −214 m (bsl). Lake Kinneret is situated between latitudes 32˚42'15&quot; North and 32˚53'44&quot; North and longitudes 35˚30'52&quot; and 35˚38'55&quot; East.</p><p>A vast number of scientific papers documenting research about the eco-physiological features of the Phytoplankton in Lake Kinneret were published [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref6">6</xref>]. These studies were mostly focused on the relations between specific chemical (nutrients) and Phytoplankton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref17">17</xref>] or physical conditions, such as temperature and sun radiation or water mass motions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref29">29</xref>], and zooplankton or fish grazing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref22">22</xref>]. Nevertheless, the issue of direct linkage or affinity between hydrological parameters and algal community structure is scarce. Moreover, most of the early studies are aimed directly at the significance of the affinity of the algae to nutrients. The advancement of the investigation processes to a further step of the linkage to hydrology is not very common in earlier studies. The present paper is aimed at an attempt to correlate phytoplankton dynamics to hydrological traits and use the nutrient as a speculative tool for this linkage. The selected parameter from the hydrological trait is Water Residence Time, which is obviously integrated inside the entire water balance frame.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The data sources for this study, 1969-2001, are the followings: Lake Information: LKDB-Lake Kinneret Data Base, Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, IOLR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref1">1</xref>]; Hydrological properties: Mekorot, Water Supply Co. Data evaluations presented in this paper include: Phytoplankton distributed densities and TN (Total Nitrogen) and TP (Total Phosphorus) distribution in the Epilimnion of Lake Kinneret and Hydrological properties: Lake Volume, Total water inflow, WL (Water Level) monthly changes, RT (Residence Time) values. Statistical evaluation methods include simple averaging and Linear (between X-independent and Y-dependant parameters: Y = ax + b; r<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.3, p &lt; 0.01) and Fractional Polynomial Regressions (STATA .9. Reference A-J pp. 357-370).</p><p>Residence Time computation is based on the following equation:</p><p>W = Monthly inflow in mcm per month (10<sup>6</sup> m<sup>3</sup>/month).</p><p>V = Monthly values of lake Volume in mcm ( 10 <sup>6</sup> m <sup>3</sup> ).</p><p>RT = V/W per month in months or years.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>General scheme of temporal (monthly) trend of changes of Phytoplankton dynamics as linearly predicted by Nutrients: Epilimnetic loads of TN and TP, and TN/TP mass ratios in the Epilimnion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); Phytoplankton dynamics influenced by Hydrological properties: Water inflows, and Residence Time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), WL monthly changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Results given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(A) indicate TN stock limitation for Peridinium but not for Cyanophyta, Diatoms and Chlorophyta. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(B) indicates TP stock limitation for Peridinium and Diatoms but not for Chlorophyta. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(C) indicates that the decline of TN/TP mass ratio in the Epilimnion, where Phytoplankton is accommodated, reflects TN decrease and TP elevation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref24">24</xref>], which is a combined condition not favored by all algal groups. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> indicates TN, TP and, to a lesser extent, TN/TP mass ratio elevation predicted responses to the enhancement of Water inflows. It probably characterized the situation during heavy winter floods. RT prolongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) occurs when water inflows decline and, consequently, TN declines and Peridinium, the ultimate consumer of Nitrogen, reduces as well. Moreover, RT prolongation also responded by Diatom’s decline. It is likely that not only does Nitrogen availability decline but also another element deficiency occurs, probably Silica. Diatoms require Silica, and when Silica reduces, Diatoms decline as well. Peridinium and Diatoms are both dependants of outsourcing elemental supply, of Nitrogen and Silica [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref4">4</xref>]. Nevertheless, Chlorophyta</p><p>and Cyanophyta rely on internal or atmospheric dustfall P-supply (Chlorophyta) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref25">25</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref29">29</xref>], or atmospheric N-fixation (Cyanophyta) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96127-ref30">30</xref>]. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> indicates an enhancement of Peridinium and Diatoms in relation to WL and a similar response between WL and RT changes. The elevation of WL is accompanied by shorter RT and vice versa.</p><p>Long-term FP (Fractional Polynomial) evaluation of monthly RT (Residence Time) values indicates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) significant increase since the mid-1970’s from 7.1 to 9.1 years (see methods). This trend of change is likely to be caused by reduction of inflows or decline of outflow accompanied by lake volume elevation</p><p>or a combination of both. The hydrological features of Lake Kinneret are probably indicated as principal conditional parameters affecting Phytoplankton dynamics (Figures 1-3). Moreover, FP evaluation of multi-annual (1969-2001) averages of monthly RT values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) confirm this definition of the natural trend of RT values: trend of multiannual increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) and seasonal prolongation trend from December to September next year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), which corresponds to the natural Hydrological cycle (Figures 5-9): from May, Inflow declines after earlier elevation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), Lake Volume is reduced from September after an earlier increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), trend (FP) of Inflow decline from January to September following earlier increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>), and finally (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) trend</p><p>(not a point value) of WL decline from January to August followed by trend (FP) of increase. The monthly changes of WL were averaged annually, and FP regression was evaluated with the respective RT values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). Heavy floods (inflow) obviously correspond with WL increase (0.31 - 0.49 m/month) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0), while there is more decline in monthly changes in WL, later followed by WL lowering, both of which are related to RT prolongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). RT value longer than 7 years is respectively correlated with lower monthly WL change (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). The natural Hydrological cycle is likely to be in accordance with Phytoplankton dynamics. Therefore, further evaluation is aimed at identifying</p><p>the driving forces that govern the long-term trends that have been presented in Figures 1-3.</p><p>The impact of Hydrology on Nutrients and Phytoplankton Dynamics</p><p>Monthly changes of Epilimnetic TN stock are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. Inflow and WL decline while Lake Volume elevation and RT prolongation (Figures 5-10) are correlated with the Epilimnetic load decline of TN. Results presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 indicate an increase of Epilimnetic TP loads during January-April and gradual decline later on until December and correlated with the temporal level of Hydrological parameters as follows (Figures 5-10): RT prolongation during January-September, shortened later; WL increase during January-May and later decline, which is obviously a similar trend to Lake Volume, WL changes and Inflow fluctuations. The seasonal changes of Epilimnetic TN/TP mass ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3) indicate a decline from January to May and a later elevation. The respective relations between TN, TP and TN/TP mass ratio and Hydrological conditions (extracted as RT length) are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4. The decline of TN/TP Mass ratio is respective to the prolongation of RT length; a steep decline is correlated to a very slight reduction of RT length and a gradual low decrease in RT prolongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4). The higher the RT value is, the lower the Epilimnetic TN/TP mass ratio. Moreover, during the short winter/spring season, the Peridinium bloom is maximal, and P-mediated input is intensive and the change of RT length is minimal due to hydrological enhancement. The decline of TN/TP mass ratio is attributed mostly to phosphorus enhancement. Nevertheless, later on the TN/TP mass ratio decline is also attributed to Nitrogen load decline and RT prolongation caused by diminished Hydrology. The biomass of Peridinium contributes Phosphorus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5) and the Hydrological carrier contributes Nitrogen. The shortest RTs were recorded during the Peridinium bloom onset and</p><p>later when RT length declines, P-mediated Peridinium dissipates, and Epilimnetic stock diminishes. Shortest RTs were recorded during winter, and later in the year RT becomes longer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6).</p><p>Conclusively, algal dynamics relate to RT length as follows (Figures 17-20):</p><p>Peridinium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7): Prolongation of RT corresponds to the reduction of the Peridinium biomass. The prolongation of RT is a signal of Nitrogen availability deficiency and the slight increase of Peridinium biomass during the longest RT, which is probably attributed to Nitrogen input by fixation carried out by Cyanobacteria.</p><p>Diatoms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8): During short RT (1 - 4 years, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8), due to intensive inflows and other Hydrological parameters, Diatom biomass is abruptly enhanced.</p><p>It is suggested that it is due to an external supply of Silica, which is mostly supplied from the drainage basin outsourcing. Later on, when Hydrological features and Silica input diminish, Diatom biomass is reduced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8).</p><p>Cyanophyta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9): A prominent increase of the Cyanophyta Biomass (from 1.9 to 6.3 g/m<sup>2</sup>) was documented in response to RT prolongation from 1 to 15 years accompanied by the decline of Nitrogen availability. It is likely that due to the overcome capability of Nitrogen deficiency by Nitrogen fixation maintained by Cyanophytes. The decline of the competition with Peridinium supports this as well. It is assumed that the minor decline of Cyanophytes biomass during the longest RT is due to the lack of Phosphorus when Peridinium is absent.</p><p>Chlorophyta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0): Results in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0 indicate a prominent increase in the biomass of Chlorophyta when RT becomes longer within the range of below 10 years. When RT is longer, the biomass of Chlorophyta is not enhanced persuasively, reflecting nutrient shortage conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusive Remarks</title><p>Hydrological parameters extracted as Residence time length were indicated as Key factor, which is responsible for the Phytoplankton dynamics in Lake Kinneret. Nitrogen sources are mostly in the drainage basin carried out into the lake by river inflows and Cyanophytes capabilities to maintain atmospheric Nitrogen fixation. Sources of Phosphorus are in the drainage basin, dust deposition and bottom sediments carried into the Epilimnion by Peridinium-mediated cells. The role of Hydrological parameters was found to be, crucially, controlling Phytoplankton dynamics.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Gophen, M. (2019) Relation Significance between Hydrological Residence Time and Phytoplankton Dynamics in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Open Journal of Ecology, 9, 479-492. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2019.911031</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96127-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2018) Ecological Research in the Lake Kinneret and Hula Valley (Israel) Ecosystems. Scientific Research Publishing Inc., Wuhan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serruya, C. (1978) Lake Kinneret, Monographiae Biologicae. Volume 32, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9954-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zohary, T., Sukenik, A., Berman, T. and Nishri, A. (2015) Lake Kinneret: Ecology and Management. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8944-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LKDB (1969-2001) Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, IOLR: Lake Kinneret Data Base and Annual Reports. Mekorot Water Supply Co. Northern Region Monitor Unit 1970-2018. Data Base, Annual Reports. Jordan River Discharges at Gesher Huri (Gesher Ha’Pkak).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. and Gal, I. (1992) Lake Kinneret. Ministry of Defence and Kinneret Authority Publishers, Israel, 335 p. (In Hebrew)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2019) Different Kinneret. Galilee Books Publishers and Migal-Scientific Research Institute, Kiryat Shmona, 158 p. (In Hebrew)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benndorf, J., Boing, W., Koop, J. and Neubauer, I. (2002) Top-Down Control of Phytoplankton: The Role of Time Scale, Lake Depth and Trophic State. Freshwater Biology, 47, 2281-2295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00989.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berman, T. (1970) Phosphtase and Phosphorus Availability in Lake Kinneret. Limnology and Oceanography, 15, 663-674. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1970.15.5.0663</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Falcover, I.B. (2005) Cyanobacterial Toxins of Drinking Water Supplies, Cylindrospermopsins and Microcystins. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2015). The Impact of Available Nitrogen Defficiency on Long-Term Changes in the Lake Kinneret Ecosystem. Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 147-157.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.54013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2015a) Experimental Study of the Aphanizomenon ovalisporum Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in the Sub-Tropical Eu-Meso-Trophic Lake Kinneret (Israel). Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 259-265.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.56020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2015b) Experimental Study of the Aphanizomenon ovalisporum Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in the Sub-Tropical Eu-Meso-Trophic Lake Kinneret (Israel), Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 259-265. 
https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.56020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodhe, W. (1978) Chapter: Peridinium cinctum fa westii, 4: Growth Characteristics. In: Lake Knneret: Monographiae Biologicae, Volume 32, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, London, 275-285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serruya, C. and Berman, T. (1975) Phosphorus and Nitrogen and the Growth of Algae in Lake Kinneret. Journal of Phycology, 121, 155-1632.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serruya, C. and Pollingher, U. (1971) An Attempt at Forecasting the Peridinium Bloom in Lake 3 Kinneret (Lake Tiberias). Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie: Mitteilungen, 19, 277-291. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/05384680.1971.11903936</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, V.H. (1982) The Nitrogen and Phosphorus Dependence of Algal Biomass in Lakes: An Experimental and Theoretical Analysis. Limnology and Oceanography, 27, 1101-1112. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.6.1101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, V.H. (1983) Low Nitrogen to Phosphorus Ratios Favor Dominance by Blue-Green Algae in Lake Phytoplankton. Science, 221, 669-671. 
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.221.4611.669</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berman, T. (1976) Light Penetrance in Lake Kinneret. Hydrobiologia, 49, 41-48. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016166</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rimmer, A., Gal, G., Opher, T., Leschinsky, Y. and Yacobi, Y.Z. (2011) Mechanisms of Long-Term Variations of the Thermal Structure in Awarm Lakw. Limnology and Oceanography, 56, 974-988. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2011.56.3.0974</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Havens, K.E., James, R.T., East, T. and Smith, V.H. (2003) N:P Ratios, Light, Limitation, and Cyanobacterial Dominance in a Subtropical Lake Impacted by Non-Point Source Nutrient Pollution. Environmental Pollution, 122, 379-390. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00304-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serruya, C., Goiphen, M. and Pollingher, U. (1980) Lake Kinneret: Carbon Flow Patternand Ecosystem Management. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 88, 265-302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2014) Competitive Consumption of the Lake Kinneret (Isrel) Plankton by Hypophthalmichthys Molitrix and Sarotherodon galilaeus. Open Journal of Ecology, 4, 532-542. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.49043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M., Smith, V.H., Nishri, A. and Threlkeld, S.T. (1999) Nitrogen Deficiency, Phosphorus Sufficiency, and the Invasion of Lake Kinneret, Israel, by N2-Fixing Cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon ovalisporum. Aquatic Sciences, 61, 293-306. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taranun, Z.E., Gregory, E., Leavitt, P.R., Buchaca, T., Katalan, J., Guilizzoni, P., Lami, A., McGowan, S., Moorhouse, H., Murabito, G., Mark, F.R., Stevenson, A., Thompson, P.L. and Vinerbrook, R.D. (2015) Acceleration of Cyanobacterial Dominance in North Temperate-Subarctic Lakes during the Anthropocene. Ecology Letters, 18, 375-384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ganor, E., Foner, H.A. and Gravenhost, G. (2003) The Amount and Nature of the Dustfall on Lake Kinneret (the Sea of Galilee), Israel: Flux and Fractionation. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 4301-4315.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00455-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nishri, A. (2014) Chapter 19.4.3. Atmospheric Sources: Dry Deposition (Dust). In: Zohary, T., Sukenik, A., Berman, T. and Nishri, A., Eds., Lake Kinneret: Ecology and Management, Springer, New York, 341-346.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishri, A. and Sukenik, A. (2012) Monitoring of Selenium Species in Lake Kinneret and Its Drainage Basin. (In Hebrew)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishri, A, Brenner, I.B., Hall, G.E.M. and Taylor, H.E. (1999) Temporal Variation in Dissolved Selenium in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Aquatic Sciences, 61, 215-233. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s000270050063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishri, A. and Gavrieli, I. (2019) Integrative Approach to the Study of the Impact of Water Bodies in the Hula Valley on Lake Kinneret. 2nd Annual Report Submitted to the Water Authority, IOLR Report No. T8-2019, 22 p. (In Hebrew)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96127-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shapiro, J. (1973) Blue-Green Algae: Why They Become Dominant. Science, 179, 382-384. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4071.382</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>