<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ASM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Sexual Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5191</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/asm.2019.94007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ASM-96096</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Prevalence of Dyspareunia and Its Effect on Sexual Life among Gynaecological Clinic Attendees in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunday</surname><given-names>Uchenna Asogwa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Johnbosco</surname><given-names>Ifunanya Nwafor</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayodele</surname><given-names>Adegbite Olaleye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Darlington-Peter</surname><given-names>Chibuzor Ugoji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chuka</surname><given-names>Nobert Obi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chukwunenye</surname><given-names>Chukwu Ibo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>110</fpage><lpage>119</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: Dyspareunia is one of the most common complaints in gynae-cologic practice with tremendous effect on both quality of life and sexual rela-tionship of women. 
  Objectives: To determine the prevalence of dyspareunia and its effect on sexual life among gynaecology clinic attendees in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki. 
  Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on consenting participants between 12th May 2016 and 25th July 2016. Anonymous self-administered questionnaires were used collection information on dyspareunia and its effect on sexual life at the Gynaecology clinic. The data was analyzed using Epiinfo version 7.1.5. 
  Results: One hundred and four (104) women participated in this study. Most of the women studied were Igbos (95.19%), and were mainly between the age ranges of 21 - 30 years (66.35%). Most of them were married (89.42%), and were also mainly of the Pentecostal denomination (40.78%). The mean age at coitarche was 20.6 &#177; 3.95 years. Prevalence of dyspareunia was 36% and only 16% sought medical help. The various responses to dyspareunia were avoidance of sex 11%, reduced frequency of intercourse 8%, less desire for sex 19%, while majority of women with dyspareunia tolerated it (62%). 
  Conclusion: The prevalence of dyspareunia is high in our society afflicting young women in their reproductive years with associated enormous stress on their sexual life.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Prevalence of Dyspareunia and Its Effect on Sexual Life among Gynaecological Clinic Attendees in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dyspareunia is one of the sexual dysfunctions found among women and it is referred to as painful sexual intercourse and is associated with poor quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref1">1</xref>].<sup> </sup></p><p>Dyspareunia though highly prevalent is under-recognized in practice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref2">2</xref>] The lack of public health information about dyspareunia and the reluctance of health care providers to inquire about sexual problems may contribute to many women delaying treatment for a serious health problem with potential negative biopsychosocial outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>The causes of dyspareunia may be mixed between physiological and psychological, interpersonal and sociocultural causes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref4">4</xref>]. The common physical causes of dyspareunia include interstitial cystitis, pelvic inflammatory disease and chronic pelvic pain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref5">5</xref>]. Psychological causes could result from fear of pain, interpersonal disturbance, sexual abuse, stress and anxiety from work and family responsibilities, concern about about sexual performance, conflicts in relationship with partner, depression, unresolved sexual orientation issues, previous traumatic sexual or physical experience, body image and self-esteem problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref7">7</xref>].</p><p>Female dyspareunia is a serious impairment with prevalence of up to 39.5%, imposing a significant burden on women’s health, relationship and quality of life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref7">7</xref>]. When not in a relationship, dyspareunia may prevent a woman from approaching new partners or starting a new relationship. They may feel ashamed and embarrassed and therefore isolate themselves. It may be the presenting symptom of variety of disease states with components of both physical and organic dysfunction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref18">18</xref>].</p><p>This study aims to determine the prevalence of dyspareunia among women of reproductive age group attending gynaecology clinic. In addition, the effect of dyspareunia on their sexual life will also be sought for. No study of this sort has ever been conducted in this environment, hence the necessity to do so.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Method</title><p>Study Background: Ebonyi state is one of the five states in the South East Geopolitical zone of Nigeria. It has a population of about 2.1 million people and is inhabited mainly by the Igbo speaking community. Majority of the population are rural dwellers and farmers. Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital (formerly known as Federal Teaching Hospital), Abakaliki is located within the centre of the state capital. It receives referral from all parts of the state and neighbouring states of Abia, Benue, Cross-River, and Enugu. The Gynaecology clinic holds daily Mondays through Fridays and is run by consultant Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and resident doctors in the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.</p><p>Study Population: This included all sexually active women between ages of 15 - 60 years who presented at the gynaecology clinic were recruited into the study.</p><p>Study Design: This was a descriptive cross sectional study. Inclusion criteria include: sexually active women in heterosexual relationship. Individuals with chronic conditions like hypertension, diabetes mellitus or on any medication that affects sexual function will be excluded. Chronic alcoholics or those who smoke will be excluded as they affect sexual function in various ways. In addition individuals who decline consent were excluded. The study was done using questionnaire administered in English language (see Appendix 1). The questionnaire was pretested. The first part contained sociodemographic data of participants. Information extracted from the participants includes; Age, marital status, parity, religion, educational attainment, occupation and ethnicity. Participants were also asked questions to determine the prevalence and impact of dyspareunia on their sexual life. Dyspareunia in this study was defined as recurrent or persistent pain during or after sexual intercourse.</p><p>Sample Size Calculation: The sample size for the study was determined using a prevalence rate of 7% found in a study by Nwagha et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref9">9</xref>] in Enugu, Nigeria. N = p(1 − p)z<sup>2</sup>/d<sup>2</sup>. N = sample size, z = z-score, d = desired error margin, p = prevalence. Using 95% confidence interval and prevalence 7%, d = 0.05, z = 1.96, p = 0.07. N = 0.07(1 − 0.07)1.962/0.052 = 100. Sample size = 100% + 20% attrition = 120% Gynaecology clinic attendees.</p><p>Data Analysis: The information obtained was analyzed using EpiinfoTM version 7.1.5 of 2015 CDC Atlanta Georgia USA. Chi-square test was used for proportions. Significance was established at p value of &lt;0.05.</p><p>Ethical Consideration: The ethical clearance for the study was sought and obtained from Research and Ethics Committee of Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total of 120 women were interviewed using the questionnaires. One hundred and four (104/120), 86.7% of the questionnaires were included in the analysis. The rest of them (13.3%) were either not retrieved or had incomplete data. The prevalence of dyspareunia in this study was 37 (36%).</p><p>The sociodemographic data are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Most of the participants were Igbos (95%) within age range 18 - 50 years. Greatest proportion (66.35%) of the respondents was within age range of 21 - 30 years while the least proportion (3.85%) was 41 - 50 years. Most (89.42%) were married and nulliparous (34.62%). Pentecostal denominations had greatest population (40.78%) and the least (3.85%) were Muslims. Most (50%) had tertiary education and were unskilled (42.31%).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the mean age of coitarche as 20.6 &#177; 3.95 years with prevalence of dyspareunia at first sexual intercourse seen in 87.50%. The prevalence of dyspareunia within the past 6 months was 36% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) while only 6 (16.2%) sought medical help. The various responses to dyspareunia were avoidance of sex (11%), reduced frequency of intercourse (8%), and less desire for sex (19%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Majority (62%) of women with dyspareunia lived with condition without medical assistance.</p><p>Prevalence of dyspareunia according to various sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Respondents between the ages of 21 and 30 years and nulliparous women had the highest prevalence of 80% and 57% respectively. When considered based on educational attainment, respondents with only primary education (20) had the highest prevalence of dyspareunia. Participants who were unskilled workers were found to have highest prevalence (17). Demographic characteristics like age, parity, educational attainment and occupation did not show any statistical significance for dyspareunia.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational qualification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No formal education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unskilled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skilled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethnic group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Igbo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hausa/Fulani</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yoruba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Dyspareunia and its effect on sexual life of the study participants</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean age of coitarche (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dyspareunia at coitarche</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dyspareunia within past 6 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effect of dyspareunia on sex within past 6 months</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avoidance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reduced frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less desire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No change</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consulted a Doctor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Condition after consultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Satisfactory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fair</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No change</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Worse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between presence of dyspareunia and sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dyspareunia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No Dyspareunia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational qualification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No formal education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skilled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unskilled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Dyspareunia still remains a common sexual problem of women in our society and constitutes a huge public health concern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref8">8</xref>]. Most cases of dyspareunia appear to be under-reported and many afflicted women are reluctant to discuss their sexual concern with their physician.</p><p>In this study, the prevalence of dyspareunia was 36%. This is higher than prevalence of 7% in Enugu state, Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref9">9</xref>] but however, within the range of prevalence in Turkey 7.8 - 47.2% with 46.9% and 54.5% by Sobhgol et al. in Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref15">15</xref>]. The difference in prevalence between Enugu study and the index study may be due to their different study population characteristics. Enugu study considered women in campus community while the present study surveyed gynaecological clinic attendees with clinical problems. The relatively high prevalence of dyspareunia is not a surprise since most afflicted women scarcely discuss their sexual predicament.</p><p>Among thirty seven (37%) of women with dyspareunia in this study, only 6 (16%) had consulted their doctor on this matter while the remaining 84% never sought for help. This is, however, marginally lower than that in a survey by Danielsson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref16">16</xref>] where 28% of those with dyspareunia consulted their doctors. This attests to the reluctance with which women discuss their sexual difficulty with their caregiver especially in our environment where such discussions may be viewed as a taboo. The respondents who consulted doctors might have done so because of unbearable symptoms or awareness of availability of treatment.</p><p>Following consultation, 4 (64%) was satisfied while the remainder had results ranging from little improvement to no change in their conditions. This agrees with study by Brotto et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref16">16</xref>] where over half of the women (54.8%) reported significant improvement in dyspareunia following treatment. In study by Danielsson et al., 20% recovered after treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Treatments of dyspareunia depend on the underlying causes identified. If it is due to infection antibiotics or antifungals may be necessary. Inflammatory causes may resolve with sitz baths while skin conditions like lichen sclerosus and lichen planus often improve with steroid creams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref17">17</xref>]. Vulva vestibulitis are typically treated using topical oestrogen cream, low-dose pain medications, and physical therapy with biofeedback to lower the muscle tension in the pelvic floor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref18">18</xref>]. Endometriosis may be treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral contraceptive pills, gonadotropin realizing hormone analogue or surgical procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref18">18</xref>]. However, psychological counselling may be all that is needed to address stress or anxiety associated with sexual intercourse without apparent aetiology.</p><p>The response of women with dyspareunia in this survey varied from avoidance 4 (11%), reduced frequency of intercourse 3 (8%), less desire for sex, 7 (19%). In over half 23 (62%), dyspareunia did not alter their sexual life. Brotto et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.96096-ref16">16</xref>] noted 38% avoidance of sexual intercourse. In another study by Glatt et al. 17 48% of the women reported a decrease in sexual frequency and 53.7% reported important adverse effect on their relationships as a result of dyspareunia. The fewer incidence of negative influence of dyspareunia observed in index study might be due to male dominance in our society and the fear of being considered sexually weak.</p><p>An accurate determination of prevalence of dyspareunia is vital in understanding the burdens among women and women with risk factors for prevention efforts. The practicing Gynaecologist should recognize that asking about such difficulties like dyspareunia should be a routine part of clinical practice. The tactful and comfortable discussion of such issues is important in helping the patient maintain good quality of sexual life. Early attention to sexual difficulties may help prevent the development of more severe problems like marital disharmony.</p><p>This study has some limitations. The findings in this survey may not give a broad picture of burden of dyspareunia in our society because the population studied was already perceived to have gynaecological problems. Furthermore, dyspareunia is just one of the gamuts of sexual concerns of women which may coexist and have a synergistic effect on each other thereby influencing the effect of various abnormalities when considered singly.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, dyspareunia is an important sexual dysfunction among women with a high prevalence in our society. Few of the affected women are willing to discuss their problems with their caregiver. The appreciably high improvement following treatment lays credence to the importance of medical consultation for these women. There is a need for a high index of suspicion among caregivers to inquire on possibility of sexual difficulty of their clients since most of them may not initiate the discussion.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Asogwa, S.U., Nwafor, J.I., Olaleye, A.A., Ugoji, D.-P.C., Obi, C.N. and Ibo, C.C. (2019) Prevalence of Dyspareunia and Its Effect on Sexual Life among Gynaecological Clinic Attendees in Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria. Advances in Sexual Medicine, 9, 110-119. https://doi.org/10.4236/asm.2019.94007</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Appendix 1</title><p>Questionaire: To Assess the Prevalence of Dyspareunia and Its Effect on Sexual Life among Gynaecological Clinic Attendees in Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki</p><p>1) Date ____</p><p>2) Age &lt; 20 21 - 30 31 - 40 41 - 50 &gt;50</p><p>3) Marital status. Single married Divorced widowed Married/separated</p><p>4) Parity ______</p><p>5) Religion. Catholic Protestant Muslim Pentecostal Traditional Others</p><p>6) Level of Education. No formal education Primary Secondary, Tertiary</p><p>7) Occupation. Unemployed Unskilled Skilled Professional</p><p>8) Ethnic group. Ibo Hausa/Fulani Yoruba Others</p><p>9) At what age did you have first sexual intercourse?</p><p>10) Was it painful? Yes No</p><p>11) Have you had painful intercourse in the past 6 months? Yes No</p><p>12) What was your response if yes to (11) what was your response to sex? Avoidance Reduce frequency Less desire Had no effect Others (specify)___________________</p><p>13) Did you seek for medical help? Yes No</p><p>14) How did you feel following consultation? Satisfactory good</p><p>Fair No change Worse</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.96096-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fajewonyomi, B.A., Orji, E.O. and Adeyemo, A.O. (2007) Sexual Dysfunction among Female Patients of Reproductive Age in a Hospital Setting in Nigeria. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 25, 101-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donaldson, R.L. and Meana, M. (2011) Early Dyspareunia Experience in Young Women: Confusion, Consequences, and Help-Seeking Barriers. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 814-823. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02150.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saboula, N.E. and Shahin, M.A. (2015) Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Women with Dyspareunia: A Nursing Intervention. IORS Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 4, 81-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sung, S., Jeng, C. and Lin, Y. (2011) Sexual Health Care for Women with Dyspareunia. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 50, 268-274.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2011.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Revicky, V., Mukhopadhyay, S. and Morris, E. (2012) Dyspareunia in Gynaecological Practice. Obstetetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, 22, 148-154.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogrm.2012.02.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jarzabek-Bielecka, G., Radomski, D., Pawlaczyk, M., Friebe, Z. and Biedermann, K. (2010) Dyspareunia a Sexual Problem in Women with Endometriosis. Archives of Perinatal Medicine, 16, 51-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steege, J.F. and Zolnoun, D.A. (2009) Evaluation and Treatment of Dyspareunia. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 113, 1124-1136.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1ba2a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yesim, B.T., Ulku, M.U., Isik, U., Gulsah, B. and Emine, S.G. (2014) Evaluation of Female Sexual Function Index and Associated Factors among Married Women in North Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3, 153-158. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.43815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwagha, U.I., Oguanuo, T.C., Ekwuaazi, K., Olubobokun, T.O., Nwagha, T.U. and Onyebuchi, A.K. (2014) Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction among Females in a University Community in Enugu, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 17, 791-796. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.144401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H., Lee, H. and Chung, Y. (2015) Dyspareunia and Its Comorbidities among Taiwanese Women: Analysis of 2004-2010 Nationwide Health Insurance Database. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 1012-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seehusen, D.A., Baird, D.C. and Bode, D.V. (2014) Dyspareunia in Women. American Family Physician, 90, 465-470.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Furukawa, A.P., Patton, P.E., Amato, P., Li, H. and Leclair, C.M. (2012) Dyspareunia and Sexual Dysfunction in Women Seeking Fertility Treatment. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 1544-1548.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aggarwal, R.S., Mishra, V. and Jasani, A.F. (2013) Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Dysfunction in Infertile Females. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 18, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mefs.2013.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sobhgol, S.S. and Charndabee, S.M. (2007) Rate and Related Factors of Dyspareunia in Reproductive Age Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Impotence Research, 19, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901495</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Danielsson, I., Sjoberg, I., Stenlund, H. and Wikman, M. (2003) Prevalence and Incidence of Prolonged and Severe Dyspareunia in Women: Results from a Population Study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 31, 113-118.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/14034940210134040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lamont, J. (2011) Dyspareunia and Vaginismus. Global Library of Women’s Medicine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glatt, A.E., Zinner, S.H. and Mccormack, W.M. (1990) The Prevalence of Dyspareunia. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 75, 433-436.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.96096-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brotto, L.A., Yong, P., Smith, K.B. and Sadownik, L.A. (2015) Impact of a Multidisciplinary Vulvodynia Program on Sexual Functioning and Dyspareunia. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12718</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>