1. Introduction

FNS

Food and Nutrition Sciences

2157-944X

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/fns.2019.1010089

FNS-96078

Articles

Biomedical&Life Sciences

Effect of Antimicrobial Myrrh on the Color and Viscosity of Plain Yogurt over Its Shelf Life

Mohammed

Alhejaili

¹Douglas

Olson

¹Kayanush

Aryana

¹^*

School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA

11102019

10101236124217, September 201927, October 2019 30, October 2019

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Myrrh , commercially available as a brown powder , is a natural flavoring substance approved for food use by US Food and Drug Administration and has antibacterial and antifungal activity against pathogens. The objective was to determine the effect of myrrh on the color (L*, a*, b*, C*, h*) and viscosity of yogurt over refrigerated storage. Myrrh dispersion was prepared and incorporated at a 1% v/v level into yogurt . A control with no myrrh was also prepared. Three replications were conducted. At a usage level of 1% v/v, myrrh influenced the color attributes L*, a* and h* but did not influence the viscosity of the plain yogurts.

Antimicrobial Fermented Myrrh

1. Introduction

Myrrh is extracted from Commiphora trees of the Burseraceae family (Commiphora species are small trees or shrubs with short, thorny branches). Commiphora myrrha is a variable species found in southern Arabia and northeast Africa as far south as northeast Kenya. Genus Commiphora comprises more than 200 species [1] . Myrrh is composed of essential oil (2% - 10%), ethanol-soluble resin (25% - 40%), and water-soluble gum (30% - 60%) [1] .

Extracts from many types of plants have been used as flavoring and seasoning agents in foods and beverages and also as folk medicines and food preservatives since ancient time. Myrrh is a safe, natural flavoring substance approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [2] . It adds characteristic flavor and prolongs the shelf life of foods by their antioxidant, bacteriostatic, and bactericidal activity [3] . Myrrh has considerable antibacterial and anti-fungal activity [2] and is used to cure variety of diseases. Myrrh alongside with honey and bee propolis can help to cure chronic non-healing wounds such as diabetic foot disease [2] . The traditional way of taking myrrh as a medicine to treat sore throat and a cold was by adding 4 oz. (113 g) of boiled water to a third teaspoon (1.67 mL) of myrrh. This was followed by consuming a teaspoon (1.67 mL) of myrrh dispersion every day.

Myrrh is commercially available as a brown powder. To our knowledge, there has not been much research performed on myrrh in foods. Myrrh could play a role in safer and increased shelf life yogurts. Whether myrrh has color and viscosity altering effects on yogurt are not known. The objective of this research was to study the effect of myrrh on the color and viscosity of yogurt over its shelf life.

2. Materials and Methods2.1. Preparation of the Myrrh

The myrrh powder (Embalee Mond Trading Company, West Toronto, Ontario, Canada) was dissolved in boiling distilled water to make 10% (w/v) dispersion. The suspension of myrrh was set for an hour at room temperature to cool down. The suspension was centrifuged (3677 g, 5 mins, 20˚C; Centrifuge, Fisher Scientific Accuspin 400, Osterode, Germany). Myrrh is composed of 97% insoluble matter that remained at the bottom of the tube and 3% soluble in the supernatant which was used. Myrrh supernatant was diluted to make 1% (v/v) dispersion to mimic traditional medicinal use concentrations. The control had no myrrh.

2.2. Preparation of Yogurt

Yogurts were manufactured at the Louisiana State University creamery. Whole milk (7.57 L) was heated to 85˚C and held for 30 mins, followed by lowering the temperature to 41˚C. Warm milk was inoculated with 2 mL each of freshly thawed pure cultures of Streptococcus thermophilus ST-M5 and Lactobaciulls bulgaricus LB-12 (Chr. Hansen, Milwaukee, WI) respectively at 0.03% (v/v). This was followed by adding 0% (control) and 1% (v/v) of myrrh dispersion with agitation. After mixing, yogurt mixes were poured into 355 ml Reynolds RDC212-Del-Pak Combo-Pak containers (Alcoa, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and incubated at 40˚C to pH 4.6 before cooling to 4˚C. Control yogurt had no myrrh. Yogurts were manufactured in triplicate.

2.3. Color Measurements

The L* (whiteness to blackness), a* (redness to greenness), b* (yellowness to blueness), C* (chroma) and h* (hue angle) values of the yogurts were determined with a HunterLab MiniScan XE Plus spectrophotometer (HunterLab, Reston, VA, USA) using Universal software (HunterLab, Reston, VA, USA). The spectrophotometer was calibrated with white and black tiles and used at D65 illuminant and 10˚ observer. Five measurements were taken and averaged for each sample at approximately 5˚C ± 1˚C. Color measurements were obtained at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 weeks of storage.

2.4. Apparent Viscosity

The apparent viscosity of the yogurts was measured using a viscometer (Brookfield model DV-II+ with Helipath) (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories Inc., Stoughton, MA) according to [4] with some modifications. Temperatures of yogurts measured were 5˚C ± 1˚C. A T-C spindle was used at 30 rpm. Data points were acquired using the Wingather 32 software (Brookfield Engineering Laboratories Inc.) and 100 data points were averaged per replication. Three replications were conducted.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed as a randomized block design with repeated measures using Proc GLM of SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Differences of least squares means were used to determine significant differences at P < 0.05 for main effects (myrrh and storage time) and the interaction effect (myrrh * storage time).

3. Results and Discussion3.1. Color3.1.1. L* (Lightness to Darkness)

The L* values of the myrrh and control yogurts throughout 5 wks of storage are shown in Figure 1. The time effect and the interaction effect (myrrh * time) was not significant, but the treatment myrrh effect was significant (Table 1) and (Table 2). The L* of control yogurt remained steady throughout the 5 wks while the L* of myrrh yogurt increased by about 2 units throughout the 5 wks storage. The lightness of the control yogurt when it was fresh and throughout 5 wks of storage was higher than myrrh yogurts. The lightness of myrrh treatment slightly increased which may be because of the degradation of myrrh dispersion throughout 5 wks storage time. According to [5] who incorporated myrrh essential oils into cheese reported that the control cheeses with

Table 1 The P-values for myrrh, time and interactions for the colors of yogurts containing myrrh and control

Effect	L*	a*	b*	C*	h*
Myrrh	0.0032	0.0001	0.3505	0.4662	0.0034
Time	0.7631	0.1851	0.9820	0.9743	0.4221
Interaction (myrrh * time)	0.6688	0.2219	0.6869	0.6850	0.5992

Table 2 Means for the colors of myrrh and control as influenced by myrrh

Effect	L*	a*	b*	C*	h*
Control	95.0700^a	−0.8980^a	10.2300^a	10.2773^a	94.9080^a
Myrrh	93.2900^b	−0.5760^b	10.3673^a	10.3847^a	92.4947^b

^abMeans not containing a common letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).

no myrrh essential oils had the highest whiteness values in fresh cheeses and over the cheese storage period compared to cheeses containing myrrh essential oils.

3.1.2. a* (Red-Green Axis)

The a* (redness to greenness) values of the myrrh and control yogurts throughout 5 wk of storage are shown in Figure 2. The interaction effect (myrrh * time) and the main effect of time were not significant, but there was a significant effect for treatment myrrh (Table 1 and Table 2). The control yogurt a* values remained steady throughout the 5 wk whereas the myrrh yogurt values decreased from week 1 to week 5. The a* value of the myrrh treated yogurts showed significant decrease in the first wk, then remained stable for the remaining 4 wks. This indicated the possibility of myrrh degradation in the first week within the yogurts.

3.1.3. b* (Yellow-Blue Axis)

The b* (yellowness to blueness) of the myrrh and control yogurts throughout 5 wk of storage is shown in Figure 3. There was no significant difference between the control and myrrh, and the main effect of time and the interaction effect of myrrh * time was not significant (Table 1 and Table 2). Reference [5] studied the effect of essential oils extracted from myrrh on process cheese spreads and reported that the yellowish parameter (b*) was higher than the reddish parameter (a*) in their processed cheeses. We obtained similar results for myrrh powder suspensions in yogurt.

3.1.4. C* (Chroma/Saturation)

The C* (Chroma) of the myrrh and control yogurts throughout 5 wks of storage is shown in Figure 4. There was no significant difference between control and myrrh, and the main effect of time and the interaction effect of myrrh * time was not significant (Table 1 and Table 2).

3.1.5. h* (Hue)

The h* (hue) of the myrrh and control yogurts throughout 5 wks of storage is shown in Figure 5. The hue for the control yogurt remained steady throughout the 5 wks whereas the hue for the myrrh yogurt increased from week 1 to week 2. The interaction effect (myrrh * time) and time effect were not significant, but there was a significant effect for treatment (Table 1 and Table 2).

3.2. Apparent Viscosity

The apparent viscosity values for myrrh and control yogurts over their shelf life are shown in Figure 6. The interaction effect (myrrh * time) was not significant. Also, the main effect of treatment myrrh and main effect of time were not significant. The

antimicrobial myrrh, did not appear to have caused any change in the casein micelle matrix structure, hence no change in the viscosity of the plain yogurts.

4. Conclusion

The antimicrobial myrrh influenced the color, but not the viscosity of the plain yogurts. Hence myrrh is recommended for use in a berry or fruit flavored yogurt where myrrh color contribution would be masked by the berry or fruit colors in the yogurt.

Acknowledgements

Support of the LSU AgCenter and USDA Hatch funds is appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Alhejaili, M., Olson, D. and Aryana, K. (2019) Effect of Antimicrobial Myrrh on the Color and Viscosity of Plain Yogurt over Its Shelf Life. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 10, 1236-1242. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.1010089

References1

Hanuš, L.O., Řezanka, T., Dembitsky, V.M. and Moussaieff, A. (2005) Myrrh-Commiphora Chemistry. Biomedical Papers, 149, 3-28. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2005.001

Lotfy, M., Badra, G., Burham, W. and Alenzi, F. (2006) Combined Use of Honey, Bee Propolis and Myrrh in Healing a Deep, Infected Wound in a Patient with Diabetes Mellitus. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 63, 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2006.11732742

Kim, S.Y., Kang, D.H., Kim, J.K., Ha, Y.G., Hwang, J.Y., Kim, T. and Lee, S.H. (2011) Antimicrobial Activity of Plant Extracts against Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh Lettuce. Journal of Food Science, 76, M41-M46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01926.x

Olson, D.W. and Aryana, K.J. (2008) An Excessively High Lactobacillus acidophilus Inoculation Level in Yogurt Lowers Product Quality during Storage. LWT—Food Science and Technology, 41, 911-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.05.017

Mohamed, A.G., Abbas, H.M., Kassem, J.M., Gafour, W.A. and Attalah, A.G. (2016) Impact of Myrrh Essential Oil as a Highly Effective Antimicrobial Agent in Processed Cheese Spreads. International Journal of Dairy Science, 11, 41-51. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2016.41.51