<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2019.910053</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-95822</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Composition and Molecular Identification of Bacterial Community in Seawater Desalination Plants
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pilar</surname><given-names>Garcia-Jimenez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marina</surname><given-names>Carrasco-Acosta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carlos</surname><given-names>Enrique Pay&amp;aacute;</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Irina</surname><given-names>Alem&amp;aacute;n L&amp;oacute;pez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Juana</surname><given-names>Rosa Betancort Rodr&amp;iacute;guez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jos&amp;eacute;</surname><given-names>Alberto Herrera Meli&amp;aacute;n</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus de Tafira, Las Palmas, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Water, Instituto Tecnol&amp;amp;oacute;gico de Canarias, Playa de Pozo Izquierdo, Las Palmas, Spain</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus de Tafira, Las Palmas, Spain</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>863</fpage><lpage>876</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Biofouling is an important problem for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane manufacturers. Bacteria are mainly involved in generating fouling and obturating RO membranes. Insights into biofilm bacteria composition could help prevent biofouling, reduce the cost of using RO-fouling membranes and guarantee safe water. Culture-dependent and independent techniques were then performed in order to identify bacteria associated with RO membranes. Bacteria cultures described the presence of six pure colonies, four of which were identified through API testing. Based on 16s rRNA gene analysis, a predominant bacterium was identified and annotated as 
  Sphingomonas sp.  The 16s rRNA gene clone library, on the other hand, showed that the bacterium, 
  Pseudomonas marincola, accounted for nearly 30% of the clone library, while the rest of bacteria were chimeras (62%) and non-representative species (3%). In conclusion, culture-dependent and independent approaches showed that two dominant bacteria were commonly observed in RO desalination membranes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Biofouling</kwd><kwd> Bacteria</kwd><kwd> 16s rRNA</kwd><kwd> Reverse Osmosis Membrane</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Pseudomonas sp. &lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Sphingomonas sp. &lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Sea water desalination is an increasing practice all over the world. Urban populations that live close to coastal areas can acquire significant quantities of fresh water through desalination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref1">1</xref>]. Reverse osmosis (RO) membranes perform an effective desalination method in terms of permeability, packing density, and fouling control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref3">3</xref>]. Conversely, membrane fouling reduces membrane lifetime and increases cost-effective maintenance. In particular, organic fouling could result in water flux decline through RO membranes so complex structures are formed by dissolved organic matters in combination with other substances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref6">6</xref>]. Unlike inorganic fouling caused by salt precipitation, organic fouling consists of marine organisms and their metabolic residues such as extracellular polysaccharides, proteins and lipids. Bacteria cells are enclosed in self-produced extracellular polymeric substances that adhere the bacteria to osmosis membranes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>Bacteria fouling is difficult to eradicate with pre-treatment methods, which has huge implications on operational costs. Several approaches based in dissecting fouled-RO membranes have given greater understanding of the specific origin and composition of biofilms.</p><p>Bacteria analyses of RO membranes have identified bacteria from phyla β-proteobacteria, γ-proteobacteria and α-proteobacteria, with representative genus of Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas and Acidovorax [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref11">11</xref>]. This has allowed science to discover the types of bacteria that adhere, grow and participate in forming the biofilm on RO membranes. Biochemical analysis of fouled-RO membranes has also described conspicuous information on bacteria communities, although only between 0.01% and 3% of the population in natural environments has been described.</p><p>Notwithstanding the above, molecular identification based on 16s rRNA gene and the specific genes that encode both fouling and anti-fouling proteins can also reveal important information and allow for the development of biotechnological applications in the future. We hypothesised that appropriate identification of the dominant bacteria from biofouling, along with the study of gene behaviour has to improve RO-membranes designs in order to prevent biofouling. The objective of this work was to molecularly characterise bacteria associated with several kinds of RO membranes with culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques, based on region 16s rRNA.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Bacteria Detachment Procedure</title><p>Four reverse osmosis membranes were employed for the experiments (Hydranautics SCW4 plus, Dow Filmtec SW30HR LE-400, Nano H<sub>2</sub>O Qfx SW 365 ES and Nitto SWC4+). Each membrane was removed from the pressure vessel once it completed its design life cycle at the desalination plant located on the east coast of Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). The main characteristics of the membrane are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The removed RO membrane was taken apart and opened in the laboratory. The membrane was then laid out and cut in 12 &#215; 12 cm (approx. 8 pieces per</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Main characteristics of reverse osmosis membranes used in this study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Membrane Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Permeate Flow (m<sup>3</sup>d<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salt Rejection (%) Nominal Minimum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Configuration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Membrane Polymer</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nominal Membrane Area: (ft<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SCW4 plus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.8 99.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spiral Wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Composite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyamide 400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydranautics. Nitto Group Co. Teaneck. NJ (USA)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SW30HR LE-400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.80 99.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spiral Wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyamide thin-film composite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dow Filmtec Texas (USA)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qfx SW 365 ES</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.75 99.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8-inch Spiral Wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thin-film composite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NanoH<sub>2</sub>O Inc. Los Angeles, CA (USA)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SWC4+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.8 99.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spiral Wound</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Composite polyamide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitto Group Co. Teaneck, NJ (USA)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>membrane) to identify and characterise the bacteria with a 16s rRNA-molecular marker. These pieces were identified according to the membrane manufacturer and placed into beaker flask containing sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.5).</p><p>Bacteria adhered to pieces of RO membranes were detached using ultrasounds bath, orbital shaking and scraping when required. Ultrasound bath was carried out for 1 min &#215; 5 times each, at room temperature. Then orbital shaking was performed overnight at 23˚C. The pieces of reverse osmosis membranes were always submerged in phosphate buffered saline.</p><p>Two approaches were used for analysing the bacteria, biochemical identification (culture-dependent) and molecular identification (16s rRNA gene, culture-independent). In addition, pure bacteria cultures were also confirmed through 16s rRNA identification.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Bacteria Biochemical Identification</title><p>De-attached bacteria aliquots (200 μl) were plated in four different culture media. These were R2A Agar, seawater supplemented with agar, tryptone yeast agar prepared with seawater and marine agar. All the bacteria plates were then cultivated at 22˚C and all media and reagents were purchased from Scharlab (Barcelona, Spain).</p><p>Bacteria colonies with similar morphologies in terms of shape and colour were isolated from each plate and grown successively to attain the pure culture separately. The pure bacteria cultures were characterised with API 20 NE (BioMerieux, Craponne, France) to identify non-fastidious and non-enteric Gram-negative rods, combining 8 conventional tests and 12 assimilation tests. API 20 NE test were performed according to the instructions of the supplier. In addition, three independent biochemical reactions were performed: Gram staining, catalase and oxidase reagent strips (Scharlab, Barcelona, Spain).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Bacteria Molecular Identification</title><p>In order to characterise the bacteria molecularly, environmental DNA from detached bacteria in the PBS solution was obtained from centrifugation at 15,000 g for 15 min. DNA was also obtained from pure-colonies from bacteria colonies isolated individually in different culture media as previously described. When bacteria biomass needed to be increased, pure colonies were cultivated in sterile PBS solution containing tryptone (10 g∙l<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and yeast extract (5 g∙l<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) at 23˚C for 24 h. The culture was then centrifuged under the experimental conditions described above (i.e. 15,000 g for 15 min) and the resulting pellet was taken as template DNA.</p><p>DNA extraction was performed following the Murray and Thompson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref12">12</xref>] procedure with modifications. DNA from each of the pure colonies and from detached bacteria pellets (sediments) were separately isolated. This way, the bacteria were homogenised in liquid nitrogen and then incubated in 800 μl of isolation solution containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.2), 4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, CTAB (2%, w/v), PVPP (0.1%, w/v), SDS (0.1%, w/v) and mercaptoethanol (2%) in a water bath at 65˚C for 1 h. A volume of chloroform was then added: isoamyl alcohol solution (24:1 v/v) was added and the samples were gently mixed by inversion at intervals of 20 s. The mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm in a Beckman Coulter Allegra X-22R centrifuge (Beckman Coulter Inc. Brea, CA USA). Successive washings with chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1 v/v) solution were performed. The supernatant was then placed in a fresh tube and an equal volume of n-propanol (−20˚C) was added, mixed gently and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 30 min. The resulting pellet, containing DNA was washed with ethanol (80%, v/v, molecular grade), dried and suspended in sterile deionised water. DNA yield was assessed using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, Delaware, USA). All samples were in triplicate. Purity DNA was valued by smear absence migrating on a 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel.</p><p>After several attempts with various 16s rRNA gene primer designs, DNA (90 - 95 ng) was amplified using oligonucleotide pairs, 16s rRNA-F as a forward primer, and 16s rRNA-R as a reverse primer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Amplification was performed in a GenAmp 2400 thermal cycler (PerkinElmer Inc., USA) with 30 cycles consisting at 95˚C for 1 min, 55˚C for 1 min, and 72˚C for 1.5 min, followed by a final extension step of 5 min at 72˚C. Each PCR reaction mixture contained 0.5 U Takara Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Shuzo Co., Shiga, Japan), dNTP, 2.5 mM, Takara Ex Taq PCR buffer with MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 10 &#181;l, forward and reverse primers, 10 &#181;M each and DNA template.</p><p>PCR products were visualised by agarose gel electrophoresis. In addition, amplification products ranging from 800 to 1200 bp were obtained and purified using the QIAEX agarose gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Hilden, Germany). The fragments were then ligated to the pGEM-T-easy cloning vector (Promega, Wisconsin, USA) and cloned in JM109 cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Plasmids were isolated using a plasmid purification kit (Qiagen Inc.). The insert in the plasmid was checked by PCR using primers M13F and M13R (Promega). The insert was then sequenced on both strands</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sequences of the forward (F) and reverse (R) primers, for 16s rRNA gene. Sequences were retrieved from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref14">14</xref>]</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gene</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Primer name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sequence (5'-3')</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >16s rRNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forward Reverse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TTCGGAATAACAGTTG CGGCTGGATCTAAGGA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forward Reverse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG ACG GHT ACC TTG TTA CGA CTT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forward Reverse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Forward Reverse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CCAGCAGCGCTAATACG TACCAGGGTATCTAATCC</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>using an ABI-310 DNA automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and BigDye Terminator v3.1. Nucleotide sequences were submitted to NCBI GenBank BLAST search and identified through similarity values. Alignment of 16s rRNA sequences was performed with ClustalX v.1.7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref15">15</xref>] using the default settings and was further refined by visual inspection. The alignment output was used to generate a phylogenetic tree based on the Maximum Likelihood method and General Time Reversibility model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref16">16</xref>] as implemented in MEGA X [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref17">17</xref>]. The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref18">18</xref>]. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% of the bootstrap replicates collapse. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref18">18</xref>]. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbour-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. A discrete gamma distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences between sites (2 categories (+G, parameter = 0.1000)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The microbial community of biofouling in RO membranes is barely known since many papers are based on bacteria which are easily cultivable on a nutrient rich artificial medium. As a benchmark, this paper focuses on isolates using approaches based on culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques through the clone library. Differences between the four reverse osmosis membranes analysed were not observed.</p><p>Although bacteria were able to grow in all the culture media—namely R2A Agar, seawater supplemented with agar, tryptone yeast agar prepared with seawater, and marine agar-, R2A Agar media showed the highest recovery of bacteria colonies and was used to differentiate bacteria. Thus, six different colonies were characterised and selected in order to obtain pure culture (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Pure colonies (colony number from 1 to 6) cultured on R2A Agar and distinctive morphological characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Colony number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Morphological Characteristics</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White uniform</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White with expansive growth</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transparent</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beige</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Biochemical tests performed with API 20 NE are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Substrate assimilations were read after 24 and 48 h. The results were interpreted after 48 h using the identification software from the BioM&#233;rieux web site [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref19">19</xref>]. When required, API tests were carried out two or three times to corroborate ambiguous sugar results that were inconclusive at 42˚C. The results agreed with those previously reported in bacteria from sugar-starved habitats that were able to develop alternative metabolic pathways for sugars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref20">20</xref>]. The API results also only showed gram-negative bacteria colonies (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Although it was easy to grow the bacteria, the presence of gram-negative bacteria suggested that the natural bacteria communities were not fully represented. Hence, this work was also supported by culture-independent techniques. Khambhaty and Plumb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref21">21</xref>] reported that a culture-based approach favoured the presence of bacteria such as proteobacteria over other bacteria groups. Moreover, over 99% of bacteria in seawater reverse osmosis membranes cannot be cultivated on nutrient rich artificial media [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>Moreover, the API test allowed us to identify four out of six bacteria colonies at species level based on a &gt;90% confidence level reported by the manufacturer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>As <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows, the bacteria species identified were Vibrio metschnikovii, Aeromonas salmonicida ssp. salmonicida w., Brevundimonas vesicularis and Sphingomonas paucimobilis. These biofouling bacteria were reported on the four RO membranes analysed, indicating that they probably adapted to attaching on RO membrane surfaces as they grew on different types of membranes. Although all these species were recognised as marine species, Sphingomonas sp. also constituted the dominant bacteria colonies. Sphingomonas has been described as the dominant bacteria on RO membranes of desalination plants and in water purification processes, as related with the formation of biofilms by this bacterium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref11">11</xref>]. Sphingomonas also facilitates the adherence of other bacteria and encourages the maturing of the biofilm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref23">23</xref>]. Thus, these results open the door to investigating bacteria communities involved in biofouling and their role in triggering a biofilm network.</p><p>Several Sphingomonas colonies were molecularly identified using the 16s rRNA gene. Using maximum likelihood, the analysis recovered a higher resolution</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Biochemical test from API 20 NE (BioMerieux, Craponne, France) in six pure bacteria colonies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >API test</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Bacteria Colonies</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gram</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Catalase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TRP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GLU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >URE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ESC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GEL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PNPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GLU</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ARA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MNE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GNT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MLT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CIT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Taxonomical identification, profile and confidence level, according to API 20 NE, corresponding to 6 pure colonies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Colony number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genus and Specie assignation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Profile</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Confidence level %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vibrio metschnikovii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low discrimination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aeromonas salmonicida ssp salmonicida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brevundimonas vesicularis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acceptable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unacceptable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas paucimobilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Sequences of 16s rRNA-gene sequences corresponding to diverse Sphingomonas strains</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species and strain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accession No.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria phylum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Proteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonadaceae family, Sphingomonas genus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas abaci C42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ575817</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas abaci C42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_042192</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas abaci SS1-08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KU341393</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas adhaesiva IFO 15099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_043391</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas adhaesiva BPM19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF289214</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aerolata R-36940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FR691420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aerolata 1111TES25Y1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LN774415</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aquatilis MPR 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KX110354</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aquatilis S7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KF542913</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas asaccharolytica IFO 15499-T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y09639</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas asaccharolytica Gsoil 130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KY078832</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aurantiaca MA101b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ429236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas aurantiaca MA306a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ429237</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas azotifigens NBRC 15497</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB217471</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas azotifigens NBRC 15497</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB680881</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas desiccabilis CP1D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_042372</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas desiccabilis CP1DT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ871435</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas echinoides S32312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB649019</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas echinoides NRRL B-3126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG745876</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas dokdonensis DS-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_043612</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas dokdonensis DS-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DQ178975</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas mali S32423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB649020</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas mali GM289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB740933</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas molluscorum An 18 ( KMM 3882)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB248285</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas molluscorum EP2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG778708</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas panni T9BP11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JF459953</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas panni L8-752</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ659481</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas panni T9BR13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JF459952</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis JCM 7510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_115615</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis JCM 7510T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D84525</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas paucimobilis BN 2056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG438514</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas paucimobilis MFC-pH7 01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KY434108</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas pituitosa NBRC 102491</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_114119</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas pituitosa EDIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AJ243751</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas pruni NBRC 15498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_113760</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas pruni IFO 15498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_026373</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas soli T5-04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB166883</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas soli NBRC 100801</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AB681244</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas wittichii RW1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_027525</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas wittichii HJX9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KP979540</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sphingomonas sp. MAH-20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MH368767</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other Sphingomonadaceae genera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blastomonas aquatica PE 4-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KJ528316</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and grouped 16s rRNA Sphingomonas with another 43 16s rRNA gene sequences annotated as belonging to this genus (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>There were a total of 1023 positions in the final dataset. The phylogenetic analysis positioned the Sphingomonas sequences, from colonies determined biochemically, within the Shingomonas sp. genus. This result (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) demonstrated that the Sphingomonas obtained in this study could be regarded as representing a species within the genus.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Sequences of 16s rRNA-gene sequences corresponding to diverse Pseudomonas strains</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species and strain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Accession No.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteobacteria phylum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >γ-Proteobacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonadaceae family, Pseudomonas genus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas aeruginosa H8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG706125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas aeruginosa ACa02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KJ754135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas aeruginosa B2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KC633284</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas argentinensis MSS-10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KM280652</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas argentinensis AL243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MG819449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas argentinensis FPBBIH7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KU605764</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas cuatrocienegasensis SR7-86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LN995508</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas cuatrocienegasensis SR7-79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LN995501</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas indica MBK3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF682348</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas indica VITPADJ5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KU598847</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas indica NRCNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MH917935</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas indica NBRC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_114196</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas marincola KMM 3042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_041592</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas marincola K-W14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ799067</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas nitroreducens R5-791</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ659791</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas nitroreducens R5-760-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ659788</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas nitroreducens R5-758-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ659785</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas nitroreducens R1-348</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >JQ659567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas synxantha X3-5-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MK120107</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas synxantha KGGI14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MH079449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas synxantha UCM B-399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MF196188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pseudomonas synxantha IAM 12356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_043425</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other Pseudomonadaceae genera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Azomonas agilis NBRC 102607</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NR_114164</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>On the other hand, sequencing of 16s rRNA gene amplification fragments, assumed as operational taxonomic units (OTU) from independent cultures, revealed forty 16s rRNA gene fragments which were identified. Thirty percent of the total number of amplification fragments (total number of OTU, 40) was related to Pseudomonas species and 3 OTUs to Sphingomonas. The dominance of Pseudomonas may be explained by the association of these organisms with submerged surfaces. The remaining sequences were unrelated to other known bacteria and these were identified as non-representative. A total of 25 OTUs were detected as possible chimeras and were excluded from analysis.</p><p>Evolutionary analysis using the Maximum Likelihood method involved 24 nucleotide sequences (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>) with a total of 687 positions in the final dataset.</p><p>The phylogenetic analysis positioned the Pseudomonas sequences in a clade within Pseudomonas marincola (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Pseudomonas marincola has been recently annotated as a marine species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref22">22</xref>].</p><p>All in all, assuming the criterion for differentiating bacteria with a 16s rRNA gene sequence similarity value of over 95% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref24">24</xref>], the phylogenetic trees of Sphingomonas sp. and Pseudomonas marincola were consistent with the molecular characterisation and their affiliations to the respective genus.</p><p>From an application point of view, it is worth mentioning that Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas have been described as containing an open reading frame coding for enzymes that are necessary for the initial stages of biofilm development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95822-ref13">13</xref>]. Therefore, these molecular identifications open the door to studying the gene expression levels that encode the attachment protein and the biofouling potential of these bacteria. Gene expression levels of fouling and antifouling proteins under different experimental conditions (i.e. high-pressure water, permeate flow) can help to: 1) indicate a functional inclination to form biofilm on a reverse osmosis membrane, 2) discover how the membrane surface is colonised, and 3) determine how extracellular polysaccharides can help to initiate biofilm formation.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, Sphingomonas sp. and Pseudomonas sp. assigned as P. marincola, have been identified on fouled marine reverse osmosis membranes. Culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches (clone library) showed that although the bacteria communities were not all identical, two dominant bacteria were commonly observed on the four RO membranes analysed.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Author’s Contributions</title><p>P.G.J. conceived, designed and wrote the manuscript. M.C.A. conducted the phylogeny analysis. C.E.P and I.L.A. carried out microbiological assays. J.A.H.M. and J.R.B.R. analysed microbiological data. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>This research was supported by the collaboration of Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci&#243;n y Universidades and from the Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. (Grant CGL2016-78442-C2-2-R, GOBESP2017-04 ULPGC) to PGJ, and co-funded by ERDF funds, INTERREG MAC 2014-2020 programme, within the DESAL+ project (MAC/1.1a/094)”. M.C.A was supported by a predoctoral fellowship granted by the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC2016).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Garcia-Jimenez, P., Carrasco-Acosta, M., Pay&#225;, C.E., L&#243;pez, I.A., Rodr&#237;guez, J.R.B. and Meli&#225;n, J.A.H. (2019) Composition and Molecular Identification of Bacterial Community in Seawater Desalination Plants. Advances in Microbiology, 9, 863-876. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2019.910053</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.95822-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fritzmann, C., L&amp;ouml;wenberg, J., Wintgens, T. and Melin, T. (2007) State-of-the-Art of Reverse Osmosis Desalination. Desalination, 216, 1-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rautenbach, R. and Melin, T. (2003) Mebranverfahren: Grundlagen der Modul-und Anlagenauslegung. 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belila, A., El-Chakhtoura, J., Otaibi, N., Muyzer, G., Gonzalez-Gil, G., Saikaly, P.E., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. and Vrouwenvelder, J.S. (2016) Bacterial Community Structure and Variation in a Full-Scale Seawater Desalination Plant for Drinking Water Production. Water Research, 94, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naidu, G., Jeong, S., Kim, S.J., Kim, I.S. and Vigneswaran, S. (2014) Organic Fouling Behavior in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation. Desalination, 347, 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, J. and Schafer, A.I. (2015) Factors Affecting Fluoride and Natural Organic Matter (NOM) Removal from Natural Waters in Tanzania by Nanofiltration/Reverse Osmosis. Science of the Total Environment, 527-528, 520-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, S., Yang, Y., Li, C., Huang, H. and Hou, L.A. (2016) The Effects of Organic Fouling on the Removal of Radionuclides by Reverse Osmosis Membranes. Water Research, 95, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fr&amp;oslash;lund, B., Palmgren, R., Keiding, K. and Nielsen, P.H. (1996) Extraction of Extracellular Polymers from Activated Sludge Using a Cation Exchange Resin. Water Research, 30, 1749-1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(95)00323-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H. and Fang, H.H. (2002) Extraction of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) of Sludges. Journal of Biotechnology, 95, 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00025-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subbiahdoss, G., Zeng, G., Aslan, H., Ege Friis, J., Iruthayaraj, J., Zelikin, A.N. and Meyer, R.L. (2019) Antifouling Properties of Layer by Layer DNA Coatings. Biofouling, 35, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2019.1568417</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivnitsky, H., Katz, I., Minz, D., Volvovic, G., Shimoni, E., Kesselman, E. and Dosoretz, C.G. (2007) Bacterial Community Composition and Structure of Biofilms Developing on Nanofiltration Membranes Applied to Wastewater Treatment. Water Research, 41, 3924-3935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bereschenko, L.A., Heilig, G.H.J., Nederlof, M.M., van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Stams, A.J.M. and Euverink, G.J.W. (2008) Molecular Characterization of the Bacterial Communities in the Different Compartments of a Full-Scale Reverse-Osmosis Water Purification Plant. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74, 5297-5304. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00387-08</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murray, M.G. and Thompson, W.F. (1980) Rapid Isolation of High Molecular Weight Plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 8, 4321-4325. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/8.19.4321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J., Ren, X., Yu, H.W., Kim, S.J. and Kim, I.S. (2010) Membrane Biofouling of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Initiated by Sporogenic Bacillus Strain. Environmental Engineering Research, 15, 141-147. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2010.15.3.141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernbom, N., Ng, Y.Y., Kjelleberg, S., Harder, T. and Gram, L. (2011) Marine Bacteria from Danish Coastal Waters Show Antifouling Activity against the Marine Fouling Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. Strain S91 and Zoospores of the Green Alga Ulva australis Independent of Bacteriocidal Activity. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 8557-8567. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06038-11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nei, M. and Kumar, S. (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. and Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35, 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Api Web, BioM&amp;eacute;rieux, Marcy-l’&amp;Eacute;toile, France. https://apiweb.biomerieux.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Br&amp;auml;sen, C., Esser, D., Rauch, B. and Siebers, B. (2014) Carbohydrate Metabolism in Archaea: Current Insights into Unusual Enzymes and Pathways and Their Regulation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 78, 89-175. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00041-13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khambhaty, Y. and Plumb, J. (2011) Characterization of Bacterial Population Associated with a Brackish Water Desalination Membrane. Desalination, 269, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferguson, R.L., Buckley, E.N. and Palumbo, A.V. (1984) Response of Marine Bacterioplankton to Differential Filtration and Confinement. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 47, 49-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pollock, T.J. and Armentrout, R.W. (1999) Planktonic/Sessile Dimorphism of Polysaccharide-Encapsulated Sphingomonads. Journal of Industrial Microbiology &amp; Biotechnology, 23, 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900710</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95822-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stackebrandt, E. and Goebel, B.M. (1994) Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16s rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 44, 846-849. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-846</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>