<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2019.1010045</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-95777</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Temperature-Programmed Reduction and Dispersive X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of CeO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-Based Nanopowders for Intermediate-Temperature Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Anodes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marina</surname><given-names>S. Bellora</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joaqu&amp;iacute;n</surname><given-names>Sacanell</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cristi&amp;aacute;n</surname><given-names>Huck-Iriart</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anal&amp;iacute;a</surname><given-names>L. Soldati</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Susana</surname><given-names>A. Larrondo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diego</surname><given-names>G. Lamas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>CONICET/Laboratorio de Cristalograf&amp;amp;iacute;a Aplicada, Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnolog&amp;amp;iacute;a, Universidad Nacional de General San Mart&amp;amp;iacute;n, San Mart&amp;amp;iacute;n, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Instituto de Nanociencia y Nanotecnolog&amp;amp;iacute;a (INN), CNEA-CONICET, San Mart&amp;amp;iacute;n and San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento de F&amp;amp;iacute;sica de la Materia Condensada, Gerencia de Investigaci&amp;amp;oacute;n y Aplicaciones, Centro At&amp;amp;oacute;mico Constituyentes, Comisi&amp;amp;oacute;n Nacional de Energ&amp;amp;iacute;a At&amp;amp;oacute;mica, San Mart&amp;amp;iacute;n, Argentina</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>UNIDEF-CONICET-MINDEF, Departamento de Investigaciones en S&amp;amp;oacute;lidos, CITEDEF, Villa Martelli, Argentina</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>10</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>631</fpage><lpage>642</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this work, we study the influence of the average crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of CeO
  <sub>2</sub>-based nanomaterials. Samples were prepared from commercial Gd
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>-, Sm
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>- and Y
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>-doped CeO
  <sub>2</sub> powders by calcination at different temperatures ranging between 400&#176;C and 900&#176;C and characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and BET specific surface area. The reducibility of the samples was analyzed by temperature-programmed reduction and 
  in situ dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques. Our results clearly demonstrate that samples treated at lower temperatures, of smallest average crystallite size and highest specific surface areas, exhibit the best performance, while Gd
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>-doped ceria materials display higher reducibility than Sm
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>- and Y
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>-doped CeO
  <sub>2</sub>.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Crystallite Size</kwd><kwd> CeO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-Based Nanomaterials</kwd><kwd> Sm&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cerium oxide (CeO<sub>2</sub>) has been studied for many years and it is still the focus of great attention due its wide range of possible applications. It is used in three-way catalysts (TWCs) for the elimination of toxic auto-exhaust gases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref2">2</xref>] low-temperature water-gas shift (WGS) reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref4">4</xref>], oxygen sensors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref6">6</xref>], oxygen permeation membrane systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref8">8</xref>] and solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref12">12</xref>], among others.</p><p>In all the aforementioned applications, there is a growing interest in the study of nanostructured materials, in which an improved surface-to-volume ratio can be obtained. This interest is founded in the consequent substantial reduction in the energy for defect formation occurs in nanocrystalline CeO<sub>2</sub>, that leads to a high degree of non-stoichiometry and electronic carrier generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref13">13</xref>] both beneficial for redox, catalytic and transport properties. For example, CeO<sub>2</sub>-based nanoceramics exhibit enhanced ionic conductivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref14">14</xref>], which is very important for their application as SOFC electrolytes.</p><p>Although the benefit of the use of nanostructured materials has already been pointed out by several authors, the studies of this type of materials from the basic point of view to understand the mechanisms underlying the different processes of catalysis are scarce. In recent years, our research groups have investigated CeO<sub>2</sub>-based and NiO/CeO<sub>2</sub>-based catalysts by dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy (DXAS) under different atmospheres and reaction conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref18">18</xref>]. Samples with different morphologies were analyzed, finding that CeO<sub>2</sub>-based materials with small average crystallite size and high specific surface area exhibit the best properties, reaching high reducibility and excellent methane conversion for intermediate temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>In this work, we analyzed the redox behavior of nanocrystalline Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> (GDC, SDC and YDC, respectively) powders. We used conventional laboratory temperature programmed reduction (TPR) and combined those results with an in-situ DXAS study under diluted hydrogen atmosphere, in order to gain further insight on the redox properties of the systems. The samples were treated at different temperatures, between 400˚C and 900˚C to analyze the influence of the crystallite size.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Procedure</title><p>Samples were prepared from nanocrystalline commercial (Nextech Materials) Ce<sub>0.8</sub>Gd<sub>0.2</sub>O<sub>1.9</sub> (GDC), CeO<sub>2</sub>-10 mol% Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (Ce<sub>0.82</sub>Sm<sub>0.18</sub>O<sub>1.91</sub>, SDC) and CeO<sub>2</sub>-10 mol% Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (Ce<sub>0.82</sub>Y<sub>0.18</sub>O<sub>1.91</sub>, YDC) powders. They were calcined at 400˚C, 650˚C and 900˚C in order to study the influence of the average crystallite size.</p><p>X-ray powder diffraction (XPD) was performed in a Brucker D8 Discover DaVinci diffractometer (Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil) operated with Cu-Kα radiation at 40 kV and 30 mA, a Ni filter and a Lynx-eye detector, in Bragg-Brentano configuration. Experimental data were collected in the angular 2θ range of 20˚ - 140˚ with a step size of 0.02˚ and a time per step of 1 s. The average crystallite sizes of the crystalline phases were determined for all the samples using the Scherrer equation.</p><p>Specific surface area was evaluated by means of N<sub>2</sub>-physisorption with a Quantachrome Corporation Autosorb-1 equipment. Samples were previously degassed with pure He at 90˚C during 12 h. Results were obtained using the five-point Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method.</p><p>Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) experiments were performed using a Philips CM 200 UT microscope operated at 200 kV. The microscope was equipped with ultratwin objective lens and an EDAX spectrometer for chemical analysis by EDS. Powdered samples were suspended in isopropyl alcohol, ultrasonicated for 2 minutes and deposited in Cu/ultrathin hollow carbon TEM grids (Ted Pella).</p><p>Hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were performed in a Micromeritics Chemisorb 2720 equipment to study sample reducibility. The mass employed for each experiment was of 80 mg. Prior to TPR tests, samples were pretreated in He at 300˚C during 30 min to remove any adsorbed species on the solid surface. TPR was carried out with a 50 cm<sup>3</sup> (STP) min<sup>−1</sup> (5 vol.% H<sub>2</sub>/Ar) flow from room temperature up to 800˚C following a heating ramp of 10˚C min<sup>−1</sup>. Hydrogen uptake was estimated using a Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) previously calibrated.</p><p>Dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy (DAXS) study was performed at the D06A-DXAS dispersive beamline of the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS, Campinas, Brazil). A Si (111) monochromator was used altogether with a CCD detector to collect the absorption spectrum in transmission mode. Self-supporting discs were prepared by mixing the sample powder with boron nitride that has no significant absorption in the energy ranges used. The catalyst mass in the discs was calculated in order to obtain a total absorption ratio of 1.5. Sample discs were located in a sample-holder with a thermocouple attached to it. The sample holder was placed in a quartz reactor, with inlet and outlet gas lines, and located in a furnace with temperature control. Inlet gas composition was set with a gas-mixing station provided with mass flow controllers and exit composition was assessed with a Pfeiffer Omnistar mass spectrometer.</p><p>We followed the evolution of DXAS spectra as function of temperature at the L<sub>3</sub>-edge of Ce under diluted H<sub>2</sub>(5% in He), in order to determine the Ce<sup>3+</sup>/ Ce<sup>4+</sup> proportion. The temperature range was of 400˚C - 800˚C. CeO<sub>2</sub> and Ce(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O were also measured as standards. Ce<sup>3+</sup>/Ce<sup>4+</sup> proportion was obtained by means of linear least square procedures using Python scripting.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>X-ray diffraction patterns for the samples calcined at 400˚C are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. All of them display the expected fluorite-type crystal structure with no sign of any impurity. The nanostructured character of the powders is evidenced by their wide Bragg peaks.</p><p>Samples of the three compounds were treated at different temperatures, in order to obtain powders with different particle sizes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> displays the X-ray</p><p>diffraction patterns for YDC nanopowders treated at 400˚C, 650˚C and 900˚C. As expected, the broadening of Bragg peaks decreases for increasing calcination temperature because samples treated at higher temperatures are formed by larger crystallites. The average crystallite sizes (D) determined from the Scherrer equation for all samples are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Crystallite sizes range from around 5 to ~50 nm. In particular, the SDC sample treated at 900˚C, is formed by crystallite significantly larger than GDC and YDC samples calcined at the same temperature.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> displays selected TEM images taken from several samples treated at 650˚C. From those images, it can be observed that particle sizes are of the same order of magnitude of crystallite sizes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), thus indicating that particles</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Average crystallite size in nm determined using Scherrer equation for all the samples studied in this work</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >400˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >650˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >900˚C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36(3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48(4)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36(3)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>are single crystals. This feature was also observed for samples treated at 400˚C and for samples treated at 900˚C, as exemplified in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> for the SDC system. From the morphological point of view, it can be seen that the particles display polygonal shapes in samples treated at higher temperatures.</p><p>The dependence of the average crystallite size as a function of calcination temperature is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, where it can be seen that crystallite growth is less significant in GDC and YDC compared to SDC. In any case, in undoped ceria the effect is more prominent than that observed in the present work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref21">21</xref>]. This is a consequence of the inhibition produced by the solute drag model due to a space charge effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref22">22</xref>]. Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> is known as one of the most efficient inhibitors of grain boundary mobility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95777-ref20">20</xref>], here we show that Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> has a very similar effect.</p><p>The values of BET specific surface area of the samples are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. As it can be observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, there is a marked correlation between SSA and average crystallite size, showing inverse trends for increasing calcination temperature.</p><p>The temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of samples calcined at</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> BET specific surface area in m<sup>2</sup>/g for all samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >400˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >650˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >900˚C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >YDC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>650˚C are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The TPR signal, directly related with hydrogen consumption, is presented as a function of the temperature of the sample. The</p><p>curves do not present the same shape, position and height of the maximum. It is clearly observed that the main peak for all samples is close to 500˚C, while a secondary peak is detected around 770˚C. The main peak corresponding to the GDC sample, notably occurs at a lower temperature than those corresponding to YDC and SDC, indicating that the first is more efficient for hydrogen oxidation than the other two. Besides, SDC sample is slightly better than YDC one considering their reducibility, in view of the lower temperature at which hydrogen consumption is triggered. No significant difference is observed between the secondary peak of the three samples. The same trend was observed for samples treated at 400˚C and 900˚C. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b) we show the hydrogen consumption as a function of temperature in which the overall picture is clarified. Indeed, hydrogen consumption of GDC triggers at significantly lower temperature and is higher in the whole temperature range, than that corresponding to SDC and YDC, which are both very similar.</p><p>We also studied the influence of the average crystallite size on the reducibility of the samples. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a) displays the TPR profiles for the YDC system as an example. It can be observed that the temperature of the main peak decreases with increasing calcination temperature, thus indicating that samples of lower</p><p>average crystallite size are more efficient than those with larger particles. The same overall trend is observed for the other two systems (not shown). Regarding hydrogen consumption (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)), it can be noticed that it is enhanced in the sample treated at 400˚C, confirming again the enhanced reducibility of samples with smallest crystallites.</p><p>The above results regarding the influence of crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of the samples were further confirmed by using the DXAS technique under diluted H<sub>2</sub> atmosphere (5 mol% H<sub>2</sub>/He). The experimental procedure was designed in order to mimic the conditions of the laboratory TPR experiments. For example, DXAS data taken at the Ce L<sub>3</sub>-edge for the SDC nanopowder calcined at 400˚C is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>, displaying the evolution as a function of temperature. At room temperature, two peaks characteristic of Ce<sup>4+</sup> are detected, while one peak corresponding to Ce<sup>3+</sup> becomes more prominent at high temperatures. By measuring DXAS data corresponding to Ce<sup>3+</sup> and Ce<sup>4+</sup> standards and using a linear combination procedure, it was possible to determine the Ce<sup>3+</sup> fraction as a function of temperature for all the samples.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> displays the Ce<sup>3+</sup> fraction (α<sub>Ce</sub><sup>3+</sup>) as a function of temperature for GDC, SDC and YDC samples treated at 400˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)) and 650˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). As it can be observed that the largest values of α<sub>Ce</sub><sup>3+</sup> were exhibited by</p><p>GDC for both sets samples (calcined at 400˚C and 650˚C), clearly indicates its higher reducibility compared to SDC and YDC systems, in excellent agreement with TPR results.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this work, we analyzed by the effect of average crystallite size and dopant oxide on the reducibility of CeO<sub>2</sub>-based nanopowders by temperature-programmed reduction and dispersive X-ray absorption spectroscopy techniques.</p><p>We obtained samples formed by single-crystalline particles of controlled grain size, ranging between 4 to around 50 nm of diameter. The addition of Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> or Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> has shown to inhibit grain growth more efficiently than Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>Our results obtained from combined TPR and in situ DXAS, evidenced that:</p><p>- Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-doped ceria display better reducibility than Y<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>- and Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-doped ceria.</p><p>- Reducibility is enhanced in the samples formed by small sized crystallites.</p><p>Even though all the materials studied in this work exhibited good properties and, therefore, are likely to be used as anodes of intermediate-temperature SOFCs, Gd<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>-doped CeO<sub>2</sub> nanopowders presented the best performance and are more promising for applications.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The present work was partially supported by the Brazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory (LNLS, Brazil, proposals DXAS-10900, XAFS1-13662 and XAFS1-15360), Agencia Nacional de Promoci&#243;n Cient&#237;fica y Tecnol&#243;gica (Argentina, PICT 2015 No. 3411 and PICT 2016 No. 1921) and CAPES-MinCyT bilateral cooperation. The authors thank Prof. M&#225;rcia Fantini for her help during X-ray powder diffraction and DXAS measurements and for her valuable comments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bellora, M.S., Sacanell, J., Huck-Iriart, C., Soldati, A.L., Larrondo, S.A. and Lamas, D.G. (2019) Temperature-Programmed Reduction and Dispersive X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies of CeO<sub>2</sub>-Based Nanopowders for Intermediate-Temperature Solid-Oxide Fuel Cell Anodes. Materials Sciences and Applications, 10, 631-642. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2019.1010045</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.95777-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trovarelli, (1996) Catalytic Properties of Ceria and CeO2-Containing Materials. Catalysis Reviews, 38, 439-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614949608006464</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaspar, J., Fornasiero, P. and Graziani, M. (1999) Use of CeO2-Based Oxides in the Three-Way Catalysis. Catalysis Today, 2, 285-298.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00510-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Q., Weber, A. and Flytzani-Stephanopoulo, M. (2001) Nanostructured Au-CeO2 Catalysts for Low-Temperature Water-Gas Shift. Catalysis Letters, 77, 87-95.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012666128812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H. and Flytzani-Stephanopoulo, M. (2003) Active Nonmetallic Au and Pt Species on Ceria-Based Water-Gas Shift Catalysts. Science, 301, 935-938.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1085721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beie, H.J. and Gn&amp;ouml;rich, A. (1991) Oxygen Gas Sensors Based on CeO2 Thick and Thin Films. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 4, 393-399.https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-4005(91)80141-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jasinski, P., Suzuki, T. and Anderson, H.U. (2003) Nanocrystalline Undoped Ceria Oxygen Sensor. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 95, 73-77.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00407-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stoukides, M. (2000) Solid-Electrolyte Membrane Reactors: Current Experience and Future Outlook. Catalysis Reviews, 42, 1-70.https://doi.org/10.1081/CR-100100259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yin, X., Hong, L. and Liu, Z.L. (2006) Oxygen Permeation through the LSCO-80/ CeO2 Asymmetric Tubular Membrane Reactor. Journal of Membrane Science, 268, 2-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steele, C.H. (2000) Appraisal of Ce1yGdyO2-y/2 Electrolytes for ITSOFC Operation at 500 &amp;deg;C. Solid State Ionics, 129, 95-110.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00319-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, S.D., Vohs, J.M. and Gorte, R.J. (2000) Direct Oxidation of Hydrocarbons in a Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Nature, 404, 265-267. https://doi.org/10.1038/35005040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, W., Hui, R. and Roller, J. (2010) Cathode Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: A Review. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 14, 1125-1144.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-009-0932-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, W. and Stimming, U. (2007) Recent Anode Advances in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Journal of Power Sources, 171, 247-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuller, H.L. (2000) Ionic Conduction in Nanocrystalline Materials. Solid State Ionics, 131, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00629-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellino, M.G., Lamas, D.G. and Wals&amp;ouml;e de Reca, N.E. (2006) Enhanced Ionic Conductivity in Nanostructured, Heavily Doped Ceria Ceramics. Advanced Functional Materials, 16, 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200500186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimicz, M.G., Larrondo, S.A., Prado, R.J. and Lamas, D.G. (2012) Time-Resolved in Situ XANES Study of the Redox Properties of Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 Mixed Oxides. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37, 14881-14886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimicz, M.G., Prado, F.D., Soldati, A.L., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2015) XPD and XANES Studies of Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 Nanocatalysts under Redox and Catalytic CH4 Oxidation Conditions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 119, 19210-19217. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05253</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimicz, M.G., Prado, F.D., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2017) In-Situ XANES and XPD Studies of NiO/Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 IT-SOFCs Anode Nanomaterial as Catalyst in the CPOM Reaction. Applied Catalysis A: General, 542, 296-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.05.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toscani, L.M., Zimicz, M.G., Martins, T.S., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2018) In Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of CuO-NiO/CeO2-ZrO2 Oxides: Redox Characterization and Its Effect in Catalytic Performance for Partial Oxidation of Methane. RSC Advances, 8, 12190-12203. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA01528G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bacani, R., Toscani, L.M., Martins, T.S., Fantini, M.C.A., Lamas, D.G. and Larrondo, S.A. (2017) Synthesis and Characterization of Mesoporous NiO2/ZrO2-CeO2 Catalysts for Total Methane Conversion. Ceramics International, 43, 7851-7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.03.101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, P.-L. and Chen, I.W. (1996) Grain Growth in CeO2: Dopant Effects, Defect Mechanism, and Solute Drag. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 79, 1793- 1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb07997.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inaba, H., Nakajima, T. and Tagawa, H. (1998) Sintering Behaviors of Ceria and Gadolinia-Doped Ceria. Solid State Ionics, 106, 263-268.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00496-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95777-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H.K. and Uhlmann, D.R. (1976) Introduction to Ceramics. 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, 456.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>