The incidence of brain metastases (BM) increased these last years. This could be explained by the improvement of brain imaging and systemic treatments [1] [2] . The management of BM is multidisciplinary involving neurosurgeons, neuro-anatomopathologists, oncologists and radiotherapists. In our African context, the main difficulties facing the neurosurgeon in Senegal are the inaccessibility of certain diagnostic means and the limitation of the therapeutic methods. These limits have a significant impact on the treatment, prognosis and outcome of the patients. Few studies have been done on BM in sub-Saharan Africa [3] . The aim of this study was to describe epidemiological, clinical, diagnosis, treatment and outcome features of patients diagnosed with brain metastasis at the neurosurgery department of the “Fann Teaching Hospital of Dakar” (Senegal).

We conducted a retrospective and descriptive study of patients diagnosed with brain tumors and regularly followed at the neurosurgery department of the “CHNU-Fann” from January 2010 to December 2017. The medical records of all the patients with evidence histological diagnosed with BM were reviewed. Patients without histology were excluded. The following data were collected: epidemiologic features (age, gender), clinical features (Karnofsky performance scale index, neurological and extra-neurological signs), investigations (computed tomography scan, brain magnetic resonance imaging, abdomino-pelvic Computed tomography scan, mammography, tumors markers), treatment (surgical extirpation, radiation and chemotherapy treatment), outcome (death, survival). The data collected were entered and analyzed with SPSS version 21.0. software. Ethical permission to conduct this work was obtained from Ethical Committee at Fann Teaching Hospital of Dakar.

In our study, we reviewed 682 medical records of patients with brain tumors, and only 20 showed histological evidence of BM. This makes a frequency of 2.9%. The mean age was 45.45 years. There was a female predominance (70%) (Figure 1).

At the admission, 16 patients with BM had unknown primary cancer. Only 4 patients had a known primary cancer with metachronous BM. These were lung cancer (1), breast cancer (1), colorectal cancer (1) and melanoma (1). The Karnofsky performance scale index was greater than or equal to 70 in 70% of the patients (Table 1). Clinical signs found were: Intracranial hypertension syndrome (headache, vomiting, visual blur) (90%), motor deficit (70%), epilepsy (50%), cerebellar syndrome (20%). The consciousness disorders were found in 7 patients (35%) and 3 of them had a Glasgow score between 12 - 15 and 4 others had a Glasgow score between 8 - 12. Extra neurological signs leading to primary cancer were found in 30%. It was a pulmonary condensation syndrome (15%), breast nodules (10%) and rectal bleeding (5%).

Brain CT scan was performed in all the patients (100%) and a complementary brain MRI in 3 patients. The brain lesions were multiple in 70% of the patients and single in 30%. These brain lesions predominated in the supra-tentorial stage (70%) [Figures 2-4]. The assessment was oriented towards primary cancer in 65% of cases. The histological type of brain metastases was adenocarcinoma (55%) and squamous cell carcinoma (45%). Five types of primary cancers were found: lung cancer (50%), breast cancer (30%), colorectal cancer (10%) [Figure 3], one melanoma (5%) [Figure 5] and one undetermined cancer (5%) (Table 2).

All the patients had been operated; In this case, it was a surgical extirpation in the presence of a large and deleterious mass effect.

In our study, 50% of the patients died 7 days after the surgery, 25% had a survival of 3 months after the surgery and 25% of the patients were lost of sight (Table 1). None of the surviving patients received additional treatment after surgery.

The emergence of new imaging methods (CT scan, MRI) and recent advances in oncology, including the appearance of targeted therapies, have improved the management and the survival of patients with cancer. In a context of remission and better control of the systemic disease, the management of BM is becoming a new issue in order to improve the patient’s quality of life. The frequency of metastases in our series was 2.9%. In a previous study in Dakar, this frequency was 11.8% [4] and similar to that found in several African series [3] [5] [6] [7] . In our regions, this result can be explained by the late management of the patients who often die before the diagnosis and by the delay of the anatomopathological tests results. These results are available 3 to 6 months after the surgical extirpation and the patient has already died. Indeed, extemporaneous exam is not performed in our daily practice. The poor archiving of medical patients records and inadequate health coverage of the population can also explain this BM frequency in our series. However, compared to developed countries where BM are currently considered as a public health problem this BM frequency of our study is low [1] [8] [9] .

In our series, the female predominance joins the results found by some authors [1] [8] [10] . Other authors reported a male predominance [11] , which can be explained by the higher incidence of lung cancer in some countries. Lung cancer is the most common cancer in men [12] , while breast cancer the most common in women [8] [13] . The mean age of patients with BM was 47.45 years old. In many countries in Europe, this mean age is about 60 years [1] [10] . This result is linked to the increased life expectancy in these countries.

In 80% of the patients, BM revealed the disease at the admission namely because our study does not include all the patients who were followed for a primary cancer in oncology and who presented BM subsequently. According to Taillibert et al. [2] , in terms of metastatic delay, BM is more frequent in the advanced and poly metastatic stages of the disease. The number of diagnosed single BM has decreased in recent year in benefit to the diagnosed multiple BM because of the improvement in brain imaging (MRI have a better sensitivity than CT scan) and systematic extension investigations.

In our study, extra neurological signs targeting primary cancer found in only 30% of patients. The poor expression of the primary cancer in metastatic context can be explained by the aggressive nature of this cancer. When BM is the single expression of the primary cancer, some authors [14] associate it with a good prognosis. Only 3 patients performed a brain MRI, which is not ideal because brain MRI is the first-line exam for the diagnosis of BM. Unfortunately, brain MRI remains an expensive exam for the average Senegalese. Imaging showed more patients with single BM (70%) than multiple BM (30%) because our neurosurgery department hospitalizes few patients with multiple BM. In our context, a surgical treatment is rarely offered to patients with multiple BM, they are then offered a palliative treatment in other structures.

The etiological investigations for primary cancer in our patients was limited compared to the standard recommended investigations. It is due to the poor financial status of Senegalese patients as well as our technical platform. The assessment was oriented towards primary cancer in 65% of the patients and this result returns to the sensitivity of the thoraco-abdominopelvic CT which remains the most available exam for the extension assessment in our context. As in our study adenocarcinoma is the most cancer found in the literature [11] . According to a study of ANOCEF [15] , in 54 patients with a known primary cancer and whose CT scan and/or IRM showed BM, a different histology diagnosis was found in 6 of them, which means that although histology is the gold standard diagnosis in cancerology it may have limits.

All the patients were operated but did not received radiation treatment, chemotherapy or targeted therapies, which decrease the success of overall care despite a good surgical treatment. An accessible single BM is optimally treated with surgical extirpation associated with brain radiation treatment, in boot on the lesion focus [16] . Surgical extirpation provides the best results in terms of the local control, quality of life and survival without recurrence [17] . However, recurrence was not to be assessed because of the large number of deaths and the loss of sight. The frequency of death found in our study is consistent with several African series [7] . Nevertheless this frequency remains high compared to data’s found in the literature [1] [16] . In our context, this frequency of death can be related to the absence of chemotherapy and radiation treatment in our patients. However, mortality remains related to the uncontrolled outcome of the primary cancer, the appearance of multiple BM [3] . Thus, it not necessary to propose an extirpation surgery to patients whose life expectancy is less than 3 months.

Five patients (25%) had a survival of 3 months after the surgery. Studies showed that the median of survival is dependent of the primary cancer [1] [2] . For melanoma’s BM, it was ranged from 3 to 6 months before the arrival of targeted therapies, with a 5-year survival rate of around 3%. Nieder et al. [16] found that a median of survival was improved slightly in their patients from 3.02 to 3.9 months after the treatment. Pratic [7] reports that radiation treatment is the best treatment for postoperative BM, and often the only one treatment for multiple BM. About chemotherapy, its efficacy is difficult to assess because it is rarely used in single treatment (often associated with radiation treatment). Taillibert et al. [18] have shown that 50% of patients who do not receive brain prophylactic radiation will develop BM, usually within 2 years, whereas these will only be diagnosed in 33.3% of cases after this radiation, hence the importance of the radiation treatment.

The rate of lost sight is explained by the fact that, culturally, the announcement of the diagnosis of cerebral metastasis is perceived by families as an imminent fatality. Patients with good clinical improvement after surgery no longer find it worthwhile to return to consultation.

The absence of a multidisciplinary consultation meeting and radiation treatment after the diagnosis were factors that limited the enrollment of the patients our study. This is due to the fact that during our study, Senegal had only one oncology service, a service that is outside our hospital. Appointments of radiotherapy are very distant, which further reduces the duration of survival.

The prognosis of the patient with BM is poor when BM is discovered at an advanced stage. Improved screening and diagnostic testing, the use of radiotherapy and other complementary therapies would be excellent support for improving the management of patients with BM. The establishment of a multidisciplinary consultation would be essential.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Thiam, A.B., Mbaye, M., Thioub, M., Kala, R.G.B., Sy, E.H.C.N., Faye, M., Ali, K.D., Ba, M.C. and Badiane, S.B. (2019) Brain Metastases: Epidemiological, Clinical, Diagnosis, Treatment and Outcome Features in Dakar. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, 9, 410-418. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmn.2019.94038