<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2019.109119</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-95460</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Morphological Diversity within &lt;i&gt;Pterocarpus erinaceus&lt;/i&gt; Poir. (Fabaceae), an Overexploited Species in the Savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koudougnon</surname><given-names>Alice Estère Goba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Léonie</surname><given-names>Clémence Kouonon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouamé</surname><given-names>Guillaume Koffi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Béket</surname><given-names>Sévérin Bony</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Issoumaila</surname><given-names>Diomandé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Raoul</surname><given-names>Sylvère Sié</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire de Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes, UFR Sciences of Nature, Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1675</fpage><lpage>1688</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Pterocarpus erinaceus is a high socio-economic tree of African savannahs. It is overexploited due to technological qualities of its wood, forage value and medicinal uses. The main objective of this study is the assessment of the morphological variability within this species in Cote d’Ivoire, in sight of rational management. Fourteen morphological traits were used to appraise the variability within 144 trees in production from six sites (Yalo, Moyenne Marahou&#233;, Kahanso, Kouassi-Ndawa, Ouarigu&#233; and T&#233;guirdouo). The results indicate that the variability reaches 6.60 for the height of the fruit and 45.99 for the weight of the fruit. The results reveal also that there are three morphological groups of P. erinaceus in Cote d’Ivoire. Of the four traits that revealed a distinction among the three morphotypes, only the width of leaves and the number of leaflets enabled their complete distinction. Trees of group 1 have long leaves with a high number of leaflets and large fruits. Trees of group 2 have small leaves with a reduced number of leaflets and large fruits. Then trees of group 3 have intermediate value of width of leaves and number of leaflet and small fruits. The three morphological groups could be useful for varietal selection of P. erinaceus in Cote d’Ivoire. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Morphological Traits</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Pterocarpus erinaceus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Rational Management</kwd><kwd> Varietal Selection</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The implementation of trees sustainable management and conservation strategy cannot be achieved without a good knowledge of the phenotypic and genotypic variability of the species, enabling individuals’ differentiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref1">1</xref>] . Morphological variability study is appropriate for overall genetic improvement and tree varietal selection activities. It enables the identification of attractive morphological descriptors, identification of traits linked to the origin of seeds sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref2">2</xref>] and possible genetic groups. In C&#244;te d’Ivoire, the variability of woody savannah species is poorly studied, when ecosystems that support them are highly threatened and native species are lost with their gene pools. P. erinaceus, commonly known as African rosewood, Senegal rosewood, African teak, African kino tree, is a species widespread in the savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire. This species, endemic to Guineo-Sudanian and Sudano-Sahelian areas, is multipurpose for local populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref3">3</xref>] . Indeed, it is sought by craftsmen for the manufacture of various musical instruments (balafons, n’goni and djemb&#233;s). It is one of the most widely used woody species in the savannah of C&#244;te d’Ivoire by farmers as forage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref4">4</xref>] . Likewise, the bark, leaves and roots of the tree are used in pharmacopoeia to treat several illnesses including anemia, cough, dysentery, malaria and infant fever [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref7">7</xref>] . This species is sought-after, exploited and threatened in West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref8">8</xref>] for timber and is exported to Asian countries, mainly China. African teak provides a high-value timber for export used in cabinetmaking, building and armaments. For these uses, the species is constantly mutilated and cut in its natural populations without any preservation measures. The high pressure exerted on the populations of P. erinaceus makes it one of the most threatened woody species in the savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire. In addition, studies carried out to date in west Africa on the species have only focused on structural variability and ethnobotany [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref10">10</xref>] and those conducted especially in C&#244;te d’Ivoire are only on germination tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref11">11</xref>] . Considering the threats on this species, it is appropriate to produce reliable data on its morphological variability, what is a prerequisite for detecting outstanding phenotypes and the development of optimal valorization plans and preservation of the species. The objective of the present study was to assess the genetic diversity among populations of P. erinaceus by morphological traits in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Specifically, this involves 1) identifying different morphological groups within P. erinaceus based on morphological traits and 2) determining the discriminating traits of morphological groups of P. erinaceus present in C&#244;te d’Ivoire.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Materials</title><p>P. erinaceus is a leafy arborescent species about 20 m high in a straight shaft. Compound leaves, alternate and imparipinnate consist of 7 to 15 leaflets from oval to elliptical shapes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref12">12</xref>] . The inflorescence is a panicle made up of golden yellow fragrant hermaphroditic flowers. The fruit is an indehiscent pods garlic at maturity, rounded and flat in shape. Straw-coloured fruits contain one or two seeds. The seeds are kidney-shaped and dark brown in colour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Description of the Study Areas</title><p>The study was carried out in the savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire (northern part of the country), the natural distribution area of P. erinaceus. According to variation in climatic factors and vegetations, Sudanian savannah, sub-Sudanian savannah and Guinean savannah can be distinguished [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref13">13</xref>] . In each of these savannahs, two sites were selected to characterize the morphological variability of natural populations of P. erinaceus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>In Sudanian savannah, the sampling sites are the Ouarigu&#233; protected area (58,000 ha) located between 9˚61' and 9˚65' North latitude and between 4˚89' and 4˚96' West longitude and the T&#233;guirdouo site (village to 5 kms from Bouna) located between 9˚25' and 9˚28' North latitude and between 2˚92' and 2˚95' West longitude. The T&#233;guirdouo site is subjected to many pressures including illegal grazing and bushfires. The Ouarigu&#233; protected area is under pressure from human activities such as uncontrolled land clearing and overgrazing. The climate in the area is Sudanese and typified by a long dry season (October to June) and a short rainy season (July to September). The annual rainfall varies from 700 to 1200 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref14">14</xref>] with the intermittent presence of harmattan (fresh and dry wind) from December to February. Temperatures vary from 28˚C to 32˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref13">13</xref>] . The vegetation consists of shrubby and grassy savannah with forest galleries along the watercourses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref13">13</xref>] . The soils are of tropical ferralitic and ferruginous types [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>In sub-Sudanian savannah, the protected areas of Kahanso (7400 ha) located at latitude 9˚17' North and longitude 7˚37' West, and Kouassi-Ndawa located at latitude 8˚13' North and longitude 2˚90' West (300 ha), constitute the sampling sites. The Kahanso site, which is poorly preserved, is typified by the presence of grazing. On the other hand, Kouassi-Ndawa site deprived of all human activities is a well preserved site. These sites are characterized by open forests and wooded savannahs that stretch over ferralitic soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref15">15</xref>] . The climate is Sudano-Guinean, under the influence of the harmattan, with two seasons, a rainy (4 to 5 months) and a dry (7 to 8 months). Annual precipitation ranges from 1200 to 1600 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref14">14</xref>] and occurs mostly during July to September. The temperature varies from 16˚C to 36˚C with an average of 27˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>In Guinean savannah, the Yalo protected area (7˚80' - 8˚10' North latitude and 7˚70' - 8˚12' West longitude) with an area of 26,800 ha and the Moyenne Marahou&#233; protected area in the department of Zuenoula (7˚52' - 7˚80' North latitude and 6˚12' - 6˚30' West longitude) with an area of 38,800 ha were investigated to this study. The protected area of Yalo is an open anthropized forest (Teak reforestation (Tectona grandis) and grazing). The Moyenne Marahou&#233; site is also subject to pressures such as farming, illegal tree logging and carbonization wich is the important activity practiced by the population in this area. The Guinean savannah is the area of the pre-forest sector made of mesophilic (or semi-deciduous) forests and savannahs. The climate is equatorial with a bimodal regime; it consists of two rainy seasons spaced by two dry seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref13">13</xref>] . The average annual rainfall is 1200 mm with an average annual temperature of 27˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref17">17</xref>] . The soils are ferralitic type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sampling Methods</title><p>Individuals of P. erinaceus from the same site were considered as one population, provenance or origin. In each population, trees separate at least 100 m from each other, with a diameter of 1.30 m from the ground (dbh) greater than 30 cm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref19">19</xref>] were selected for organs collection. Each individual is numbered with paint to prevent it from being inventoried twice, then georeferenced using a GPS system (Geographical Positioning System). A total of 144 fruit-trees of P. erinaceus from the six sites following the climatic gradient were sampled in this study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographical coordinates of the six stands of P. erinaceus and the number of trees sampled in C&#244;te d’Ivoire</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types of savannah</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Altitude (m)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Guinean savannah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yalo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.904919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.840648</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >502</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moyenne Marahou&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.609717</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.236031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sub-Sudanian savannah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kahanso</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.285753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.62309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kouassi-Ndawa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.116282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.90282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sudanian savannah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ouarigu&#233;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.614801</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.974909</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >369</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T&#233;guirdouo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.612379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.97574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Collection</title><p>Fourteen quantitative traits were measured on trees, leaves, fruits and seeds of P. erinaceus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref20">20</xref>] . The parameters measured on the productive trees are the diameter at breast height (dbh), the height of the bole and the total height. The heights (total and bole) were measured using a graduated pole. The circumference of the trees was measured with a tape measure. The mensurations on leaves concerned ten leaves per tree. The variables evaluated on the leaves are the length and width of the leaf and the number of leaflets per leaf. On each leaf, three leaflets (basal, medial and apical) were collected for measuring the length and width of the leaflet. The mensurations on leaves and leaflets were made with a graduated ruler and an electronic caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 cm. Fruit characterization was performed on 150 fruits per tree. At the fruit level, height, width and weight were measured. The number of seeds per fruit was counted. For each seed, length, thickness and weight were measured. The length and width of the fruit and seed were measured using an electronic caliper with an accuracy of 0.01 cm. Fruits and seeds were weighed with a 0.1 mg electronic precision scale. The total traits which is using in this study are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Morphological descriptors used to characterize the six populations of P. erinaceus in C&#244;te d’Ivoire</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Traits</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mensuration methods</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tree height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance from the ground surface to the end of the tree top</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bole height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance from the ground surface to the first branch of the tree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter at breast height</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dbh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ratio of the circumference at breast height on π (π = 3.14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of the leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between the point of leaf insertion on the stem and the tip of the apex of the terminal leaflet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of the leaf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lateral distance of the leaf</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of leaflets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total number of leaflets observed on a leaf</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of the leaflet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between the attachment point of the petiolule on the main rib and the end of the leaflet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of the leaflet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Willt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lateral distance of the leaflet</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight of the fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >WFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight of mature fruit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height of the fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between the point of insertion of the fruit on the pedicel and the end of the fruit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Width of the fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >WiFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lateral distance from the fruit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight of the seed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >WSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight of the seed from the mature fruit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Length of the seed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Distance between the two tips of the seed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness of the seed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spread between the two faces of the seed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Analysis</title><p>Several statistical methods were used to evaluate and analyse the structure and distribution of phenotypic variability of P. erinaceus from the collected data. The modalities of the different parameters have been codified for the statistical analyses. The coded data were analyzed using XLSTAT Ecology software version 2018.5, according to the six sites of the three types of savannah. A descriptive statistic was performed to analyze all the variables of the six sites in order to highlight the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), maximum and minimum. The relationships between the quantitative traits were analyzed by submitting a data at a matrix correlation in order to determine the coefficients of correlation. A transformation of the reduced centred variables was performed for multifactor analysis followed by hierarchical ascendant classification (HAC). The discriminant function analysis (DFA) was carried out to structure the P. erinaceus of the trees according to morphological traits. This analysis also revealed the most discriminating traits. A dendrogram from the HAC was constructed using the Unweighted Pair-Group Method with arithmetic Average (UPGMA). A multiple analysis of variance was performed to compare all discriminating morphological traits together then one way analysis of variance (ANOVA 1) were carried out using the means of the discriminating variables to compare the different groups constituted. Significant ANOVA tests were followed by the multiple pair comparison (LSD) Fisher test at the 5% significance threshold.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Global Morphological Characteristics of Pterocrapus erinaceus</title><p>The results of the descriptive statistics carried out with all the morphological traits are in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Of the fourteen morphological traits, seven (diameter at breast height, bole height, leaf length and width, leaflet length and seed length) showed a fairly high variability with CV varying from 15% to 30%. The fruit weight is the most variable trait with CV upper than 45% whereas the fruit height and width are the less variable with CV lower than 10%. The number of leaflets per leaf and seed thickness showed moderate variability (10 &lt; CV &lt; 15).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Structuration of Morphological Variability in Pterocarpus erinaceus</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Analysis of Correlations between Variables</title><p>The correlation matrix of the different variables analyzed is reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The presence of a link between the variables made it possible to retain those that were taken into account in the discriminant function analysis. The examination of the correlation matrix on the entire sample indicates the existence of some correlations strong, positive and very significant between different quantitative traits measured on P. erinaceus. There is a correlation between the leaf length and leaf width (r = 0.762), between leaf width and leaflet length (r = 0.772), between leaflet length and leaflet width (r = 0.809), between fruit width and seed weight (r = 0.701) and between seed weight and seed length (r = 0.772). The fruit</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean values, coefficients of variation (CV) and amplitudes of Pterocarpus erinaceus variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bh (m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dbh (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lle (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wile (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lllt (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Willt (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WFr (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HFr (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WiFr (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WSe (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSe (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSe (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation matrix between the fourteen morphological variables analyzed in the six populations of Pterocarpus erinaceus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dbh</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bh</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Th</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wile</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lllt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Willt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WFr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HFr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WiFr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >WSe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LSe</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TSe</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dbh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.459</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.762*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.603</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.747*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Willt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.637</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.041</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WiFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.054</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.827*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.197</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.863*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.447</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.701*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.085</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.728*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.772*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.329</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*corr&#233;lations significatives et positives.</p><p>weight is correlated positively to three characters that are the fruit width (r = 0.827), the seed weight (r = 0.63) and seed length (r = 0.728). In this case, only one of the variables of these pairs was considered. To avoid redundancy, the number of variables was reduced and five variables (leaf length, leaflet length, fruit width, seed weight and seed length) were removed.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Identification of Pterocarpus erinaceus Groups</title><p>The discriminant function analysis (DFA) was carried out using the mean values of the nine quantitative traits considered. The first factors (axes 1 and 2) of DFA represent the largest part of discrimination, accounting for 95.46% of the total variance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). These first two axes will therefore be used to describe the identified groups. The first axis accounts for 86.85% of the total variability. It is strongly correlated to fruit weight and fruit height. The second axis accounts for only 8.62% of the total diversity. The main contributions to this axis come from two traits: leaf width and the number of the leaflet. Of the fourteen traits studied, four enabled distinghing three groups within population of P. erinaceus in C&#244;te d’Ivoire.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows, in the discriminating factorial plane, the three groups formed by canonical axis 1 and 2. In addition, the hierarchical ascendant classification (HAC) carried out made it possible to group populations of P. erinaceus into relatively homogeneous groups on the basis of their similarities.</p><p>The UPGMA dendrogram highlighted three groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Groups can be distinguished from the truncation point of 117 Euclidean distance units. Based on discriminated traits, the characteristics of the different groups are:</p><p>o Group 1, located in the positive part of axes 1 and 2, consists of the Kouassi-Ndawa trees. This group represents 24.3% of all trees. The trees in this group have the best phenotypic characteristics compared to trees in other groups. Kouassi-Ndawa trees are characterized by large leaves (19.61 &#177; 2.14 cm) with a high number of leaflets (10.48 &#177; 0.90) and large fruits (0.65 &#177; 0.04 g; 69.48 &#177; 2.82 mm of height).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Eigvalues, variance in discriminat function analysis axes 1 and 2 and factorial weights of quantitative variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Axes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eigenvalues</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.169</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variance (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative variance (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dbh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.232</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.721*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.724*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Willt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.515</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HFr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.599*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TSe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.104</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Significant values: variables that contribute most to the formation of axes.</p><p>o Group 2, with 18 individuals (12.5% of total trees), includes trees of Moyenne Marahou&#233;. This group is located in the negative part of axis 1 and positive part of axis 2. Individuals in this group have small leaves (14.87 &#177; 1.32 cm) with a reduced number of leaflets (8.90 &#177; 0.94) and large fruits (0.65 &#177; 0.07 g; 68.44 &#177; 2.68 mm).</p><p>o Group 3 placed in the negative part of axis 2 consist of trees from Yalo, Kahanso, Ouarigu&#233; and T&#233;guirdouo. This group represents 63.2% of the total trees size. This group includes trees with intermediate leaves size (16.44 &#177; 2.23 cm of width; 9.64 &#177; 1.25 leaflets) and small fruits (0.27 &#177; 0.04 g).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Determination of Discriminating Traits of Morphological Groups of Pterocarpus erinaceus</title><p>The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for the parameters of the identified groups showed very highly significant difference (F = 145.2; p = 0.038). The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for each of the four discriminating traits by factorial weight showed a very highly significant difference (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). Of the four distinctive traits, two (leaf width and the number of leaflet per leaf) revealed a complete distinction among the three groups. Regarding leaf width, group 1 has wide leaves (19.61 &#177; 2.14 cm) than those in group 3 (16.44 &#177; 2.23 cm) which are wide than those in group 1 (14.87 &#177; 1.32 cm). In terms of the number of leaflets per leaf, trees in group 2 have a high number of leaflets (10.48 &#177; 0.90) than those in group 3 (9.64 &#177; 1.25) which in turn are smaller than those in group 2 (8.90 &#177; 0.94). Two characteristics (fruit weight and height) revealed a partial distinction among the three groups. Thus, trees in group 1 and 2 are larger (0.65 &#177; 0.04 g and 0.65 &#177; 0.07 g respectively) than those in group 3 (0.27 &#177; 0.04 g). For fruit height, Group 1 and 2 trees have big fruits (69.48 &#177; 2.82 mm; 68.44 &#177; 2.68 mm respectively) than those in group 3 (64.64 &#177; 4.29 mm).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Mean values and standard errors of descriptors of the different groups formed by the discriminant factor analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Groups</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Tests statistiques</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group 1 (N = 35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group 2 (N = 18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Group 3 (N = 91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wile (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.61 &#177; 2.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.87 &#177; 1.32<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.44 &#177; 2.23<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nllt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.48 &#177; 0.90<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.90 &#177; 0.94<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.64 &#177; 1.25<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WFr (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65 &#177; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65 &#177; 0.07<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27 &#177; 0.04<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1059.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HFr (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.48 &#177; 2.82<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.44 &#177; 2.68<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.64 &#177; 4.29<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Morphological Descriptors Variability and Sustainable Conservation of Pterocarpus erinaceus</title><p>Descriptive statistics made from the fourteen morphological traits of P. erinaceus from savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire revealed significant variability for some of the traits studied such as height of the drum, diameter at breast height, weight of the fruit and weight of the seed. This variability could be related mainly to genotypic factors and to a lesser extent to anthropogenic and environmental factors. There is a partial correlation between morphological variables and genetic data in trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref21">21</xref>] . Indeed, morphological characters are markers that reveal important variations between individuals of the same trees population. Thus, they enable to highlight genetic variation related to geographical origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref22">22</xref>] . The variation in morphological traits should be taken into account in the implementation of conservation measures for trees species. Phenotypic variability is essential for the selection of attractive genotypes for domestication purposes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref23">23</xref>] . Intra-specific genetic variation is needed for “plus-trees” based on a large gene pool, assurance of species’ ability to adapt to changes in the environment, to avoid the loss of interesting phenotypes for both local populations’ uses and for wood machining. No scientific large-scale reforestation studies with P. erinaceus have yet been undertaken in C&#244;te d’Ivoire. Through present study, some P. erinaceus trees of attractive and contrasting phenotypes should be used as “plus-trees” for the production of seedlings for the implementation of the species in agroforestry systems for its conservation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Morphological Variability Structure of Pterocarpus erinaceus</title><p>Discrimant factorial analysis and Ward’s ascending hierarchical classification grouped the P. erinaceus individuals sampled in the six studied sites into three morphological groups. Of the fourteen traits used for the distinction among the 144 samples, four were found to be discriminatory. Of the four, two (fruit weight and height) enabled partial distinction among the three groups and the other two (leaf width and number of the leaflet) enabled complete distinction among the three groups. These four morphological descriptors could be used as markers to identify phenotypic groups among individuals of P. erinaceus. This differentiation of P. erinaceus trees could be due to hereditary (genetic) and environmental (origin) factors. These results are consistent with those obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref24">24</xref>] on P. santalinus and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref25">25</xref>] on Adansonia digitata. Apart from the probable effect of ecological factors on the differential vegetative development of the analyzed population of P. erinaceus, the spatial structuring of morphological diversity could be accentuated by the impact of human pressures (farms and pasture) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref20">20</xref>] . In addition, leaf width and number of the leaflet traits can be used as a selection index for an improvement program to increase leaf size for forage production. Based on these results, it is preferable to make a selection from group 1 of P. erinaceus consisting of Kouassi-Ndawa trees for a valuation of the species. Also, individuals from the three contrasting phenotypic groups could be chosen as seed producers to produce plants of different origins and phenotypes for provenance tests in the three types of savannah for varietal selection adapted to each type of savannah for different uses for local populations and industrial exploitation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Discriminating Phenotypic Traits in Pterocarpus erinaceus</title><p>The discriminant factorial analysis identified the most discriminating traits for the morphological characterization of the P. erinaceus populations studied. The first component is defined by the fruit weight and height. Leaf width and number of leaflet contributed to the formation of the second component. The analysis of variance of morphological characteristics indicated a differentiation of the populations studied. It results from these comparative analyses that group 1 trees (Kouassi-Ndawa) in the sub-Sudanian savannah have the phenotypic characteristics of high modalities. However, group 2 trees (Moyenne Marahou&#233;) have small leaves with a reduced number of leaflets and large fruits. Group 3 trees (Yalo, Kahanso, Ouarigu&#233; and T&#233;guirdouo) have the smallest morphological character values. These results could be explained in part by the difference in anthropogenic action on rural populations and to a lesser extent by climatic conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.95460-ref26">26</xref>] . It should be noted that the most sought-after aspect of P. erinaceus in C&#244;te d’Ivoire is its production of wood (construction and export) and leaves (livestock feed). The discriminating traits identified constitute selection markers for routine identification of phenotypes adapted to different savannah ecosystems in C&#244;te d’Ivoire.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The study of the morphological variability of P. erinaceus populations carried out in C&#244;te d’Ivoire showed the existence of three phenotypic groups based on tree, leaf, leaflet, fruit and seed traits. Leaf width and number of leaflets enabled a complete distinction of the three groups. The assessment of morphological variability is an essential link in varietal selection to identify individuals that are in the interests of rural populations and domestication of the species. As part of this study, three groups of trees were defined. P. erinaceus trees from Kouassi-Ndawa (group 1) showed the best morphological characteristics. However, for the preservation of the species evolutionary potential, the three morphological groups must be considered to capture a broader base of the species variability. Morphological traits are not sufficient to capture the maximum diversity for genebank development because most morphological traits are influenced by the environment. Molecular analyses are therefore necessary to better understand the diversity and genetic structure within the sampled populations. Molecular markers will provide a better understanding of the genetic diversity of P. erinaceus. Seeds from the three morphological groups should be used for provenance tests primarily at the Kouassi-Ndawa, Moyenne Marahou&#233; and one Sudanian savannah site.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was carried out as part of a PhD thesis. The authors would like to thank Nangui Abrogoua University and the Soci&#233;t&#233; de D&#233;veloppement des For&#234;ts (SODEFOR) for the access permits to the sites. GOBA Koudougnon Alice particularly thanks the Strategic Support Programme for Scientific Research (PASRES) for funding its thesis work and all the managers and actors of SODEFOR at the sites surveyed.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Goba, K.A.E., Kouonon, L.C., Koffi, K.G., Bony, B.S., Diomand&#233;, I. and Si&#233;, R.S. (2019) Morphological Diversity within Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. (Fabaceae), an Overexploited Species in the Savannahs of C&#244;te d’Ivoire. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 1675-1688. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.109119</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.95460-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houètchégnon, O.T. (2016) Etudes ethnobotaniques, écologiques et morphologiques de Prosopis africana (guill, perrott. et rich.) taubert au Bénin et impacts des changements climatiques sur l’espèce. Thèse de Doctorat Unique, Ecole Doctorale Sciences Agronomique et de l’Eau, Université de Parakou, Bénin, 159 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, D. (2012) Marqueurs moléculaires. Outils de choix pour le génotypage des plantes, in: Les apports de la biologie moléculaire en arboriculture fruitière, 12e colloque sur les recherches fruitières.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arbonnier, M. (2004) Trees, shrubs and lianas of West African dry zones. Cirad, Margraf, MNHN, 574 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silué, N., Fofana, J.I., Silué, S., Diarrassouba, N., Kouassi, A.F. and Kouakou, K. (2014) Identification des espèces ligneuses utilisées dans l’alimentation des bovins dans la région du Poro (nord de la Cote d’Ivoire). Agronomie Africaine, 26, 217-229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouédraogo, N., Hay, A.E., Ouédraogo, J.C.W., Sawadogo, W.R., Tibiri, A., Lompo, M., Nikiema, J.B., Koudou, J., Dijoux-Franca, M.G. and Guissou, I.P. (2017) Biological and Phytochemical Investigations of Extracts from Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. (Fabaceae) Root Barks. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 14, 187-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tittikpina, N.K., Agban, A., Gbogbo, K.A., Hoekou, Y.K., Pereki, H., Batawila, K. and Akpagana, K. (2013) évaluation des propriétés antimicrobiennes de Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir (Faboideae) et Daniellia oliveri (Rolfe) Hutch. et Dalz (Caesalpinoideae), utilisées en médecine traditionnelle au Togo. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7, 1586-1594.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v7i4.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dedehou, V.F.G.N., Olounladé, P.A., Alowanou, G.G., Azando, E.V.B. and Hounzangbé-Adoté, S. (2016) A Review on Medicinal Plants of Parkia biglobosa (Mimosaceae-Fabaceae) and Pterocarpus erinaceus (Leguminosae-Papilionoidea). Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies, 4, 132-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houehanou, D.T., Assogbadjo, E.A., Glèlè, K.R., Kyndt, T., Houinato, M. and Sinsin, B. (2013) How Far a Protected Area Contributes to Conserve Habitat Species Composition and Population Structure of Endangered African Tree Species (Benin, West Africa). Ecological Complexity, 13, 60-68.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rabiou, H., Bationo, B.A., Adjonou, K., Kokutse, A.D., Mahamane, A. and Kokou, K. (2017) Perception paysanne et importance socioculturelle et ethnobotanique de Pterocarpuserinaceus au Burkina Faso et au Niger. Afrique Science, 13, 43-60.  
http://www.afriquescience.info</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Segla, K.N., Adjonou, K., Radji, A.R., Kokutse, A.D., Kokou, K., Rabiou, H., Kamana, P., Bationo, B.A. and Ali-Mahamane, A. (2015) Importance socio-économique de Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. au Togo. European Scientific Journal, 11, 119-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bamba, N., Ouattara, N.D., Konan, D., Bakayoko, A. and Tra Bi, F.H. (2018) Effets de cinq prétraitements sur la germination du vène (Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir., Fabaceae) dans la Réserve du Haut Bandama (Cote d'Ivoire). European Scientific Journal, 14, 438. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n30p438</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Duvall, C.S. (2008) Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. Fiche de PROTA4U. In: Louppe, D., Oteng-Amoako, A.A. and Brink, M., Eds., PROTA Plant Resources of Tropical Africa/Ressources végétales de l’Afrique tropicale, Pays Bas, Wageningen. 
https://uses.plantnet-project.org/f/index.php?title=Pterocarpus_erinaceus_(PROTA)&amp;oldid=115060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2002) Note thématique sur les Ressources Génétiques Forestières. Situation des ressources génétiques forestières de Cote d’Ivoire (zone de savanes). 47 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soro, G.E. (2011) Modélisation statistique des pluies extremes en cote d’ivoire. Thèse unique. (Cote d’Ivoire): Université Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, 173 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roose, E. (1980) Dynamique actuelle d’un sol ferralitique gravillonnaire issu de granité sous culture et sous savane arbustive soudanienne du nord de la Cote d’Ivoire: Korhogo, ORSTROM, 1967-1975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ouattara, D., Kouamé, D., Tiebre, M.S., Kouadio, Y.J.C. and N’guessan, K.E. (2016) Biodiversité végétale et valeur d’usage en zone soudanienne de la Cote d’Ivoire. International Journal Biological and Chemical Sciences, 10, 1122-1138.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v10i3.18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, K.A.G., Koffi, K.K., Ondo-Azi, S.A., Baudoin, J.-P. and Zoro, B.I.A. (2015) Seed Yield Component Identification and Analysis for Exploiting Recombinative Heterosis in Bottle Gourd. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 21, 441-453.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2014.895791</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Perraud, A. (1971) Les sols. In: Avenard, J.-M., Eldin, M., Girard, G., Sircoulon, J., Touchebeuf de Lussigny, P., Guillaumet, J.-L. and Adjanohoun, E., Eds., Le milieu naturel de la Cote d’Ivoire. Travaux et Documents de l’orstom, No. 50, Paris, 269-391.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouyaté, A.M. (2005) Aspects ethnobotaniques et étude de la variabilité morphologique, biochimique et phénologique de Detarium microcarpum Guill. &amp; Perr. au Mali. Thèse de Doctorat, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Belgique, 207 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sourou, K.B.N. (2017) Importance socio-économique et caractérisation structurale, morphologique et génétique moléculaire de Haematostaphis barteri Hook F. (prune rouge) au Bénin. Thèse de Doctorat Unique, Université de Parakou, Ecole Doctorale des Sciences Agronomiques et de l’Eau, Bénin, 147 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kremer, A. (2000) Changements climatiques et diversité génétique. Revue Forestière Francaise, 52, 91. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/5408</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morgenstern, E.K. (1996) Geographic Variation in Forest Trees. Genetic Basis and Application of Knowledge in Silviculture. UBC Press, Vancouver, 209 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gouwakinnou, G.N., Assogbadjo, A.E., Lykke, A.M. and Sinsin, B. (2011) Phenotypic Variations in Fruits and Selection Potential in Sclerocarya birrea subsp. Birrea. Scientia Horticulturae, 129, 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Padmalatha, K. and Prasad, M.N.V. (2007) Morphological and Molecular Diversity in Pterocarpus santalinus L.f: An Endemic and Endangered Medicinal Plant. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science and Biotechnology, 1, 263-273.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouyaté, A.M., Decalluwé, E., Guindo, F., Diawara, H., Diarra, I., N’diaye, I. and Van Damme (2011) Variabilité morphologique du baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) au Mali. Fruits, 66, 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1051/fruits/2011032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.95460-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agbogan, A., Tozo, K., Wala, K., Bellefontaine, R., Dourma, M., Akpavi, S., Woegan, Y.A., Dimobe, K. and Akpagana, K. (2015) Structure des populations de Sclerocarya birrea, Lanneamicrocarpa et Haematostaphis barteri au nord du Togo. Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 25, 3871-3886.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>