Vitakrisaurus saraiki has circular elongated cylinder type dorsal centrum jointed on all dorsal length with neural arch (while dorsal centra of Vitakridrinda is rectangular and elongated while the dorsal centrum of Rajasaurus is tall); Vitakrisaurus has transverse process on upper part of caudal centrum and extends into neural arch like Rajasaurus while Vitakridrinda has oval shaped transverse process which did not contact with neural arch and located on upper part of posterior articular ring on anterior caudal centrum. Neural arch on anterior caudal is forwardly inserted while in Rajasaurus the neural arch covers all along the dorsal surface of centrum. Vitakrisaurus did not have ventral keel in dorsal and caudal centra while Rajasaurus and Rahiolisaurus had ventral keel. Vitakrisaurus neural canal is dorsoventrally compressed while Rajasaurus it is circular shaped; Vitakrisaurus has well developed chevron facets in anterior/mid caudals while Rajasaurus has no chevron facets. Vitakrisaurus anterior and midcaudal vertebrae have posterior yard on posterior uncover part of dorsal aspect of centrum surrounded by laterally and posteriorly thin boundary wall while this yard is not found in Rajasaurus thick bones of manus/hand; Metacarpal I is short and thick, metacarpal II and metacarpal III are thick, long and subequal; manual phalanges are thick; and manual ungual/claw I is thick and slightly recurved downward.

Vitakrisaurus saraiki has dorsal centrum which is circular, amphicoelous, slightly waisted with lateral feeble fossa. Vitakridrinda has rectangular and elongated dorsal centrum, while Rajasaurus has tall dorsal centrum. The dorsal centrum in Vitakridrinda and Vitakrisaurus has no ventral keel. In Rajasaurus, Rahiolisaurus and Nhandumirim, a longitudinal keel is present on ventral surface of centrum. The dorsal centrum in Rajasaurus is spool-shaped, with its articular faces deeper than broad. Vitakrisaurus has circular elongated cylinder type dorsal centrum jointed on all dorsal length with neural arch. Vitakrisaurus has transverse process on upper part of caudal centrum and extended into neural arch as Rajasaurus, while Vitakridrinda has oval shaped transverse process, not contacted with neural arch and located on upper part of posterior articular ring on anterior caudal centrum. Neural arch on anterior caudal is forwardly inserted while in Rajasaurus the neural arch cover all along the dorsal surface of centrum. Vitakrisaurus have well developed chevron facets in anterior/mid caudals. Rajasaurus has no chevron facets. In Vitakrisaurus neural canal is dorsoventrally compressed, transversely oval shaped in anterior and middle caudal vertebrae. In Rajasaurus neural canal is circular shaped. In Vitakrisaurus anterior and midcaudal vertebrae have posterior yard on the posterior vacant/uncover part of dorsal aspect of centrum. This yard is surrounded laterally and posteriorly by thin boundary wall. Vitakrisaurus have leg bones with thin peripheral bone on the central hollow cavity. Vitakridrinda has thick peripheral bones on central hollow cavity. The hand/manus has three preserved digits. The metacarpal I is the smallest while Metacarpal II is largest and metacarpal III is relatively intermediate. The metacarpal I is expanded at proximal and distal ends, while in the middle constricted. The metacarpal II is the longest and also thickest. The metacarpal III is intermediate in length, thicker than metacarpal I and metacarpal II. The metacarpal I (7 mm wide, 21 mm long) is short and thick, metacarpal II and metacarpal III are thick, long and subequal. Manual phalanx I is thick and long while reducing length and increasing count from digit I to digit II and then to digit III. Manual ungual/claw I is thick and slightly recurved downward.