A first analysis of the scientific work of Giovanni Silio Borremans (1756-1830), an almost unknown physicist from Palermo, is going to be presented. He is not mentioned even in the most recent bibliographical repertories dedicated to scientific personalities who worked in Sicily. The analysis has been facilitated by documents that have been found in the archives in the city of Caltagirone (Sicily); almost all of them are manuscripts which are completely new and un-known to Science historians. This work originated from a study that we completed in 2013 on an important collection of historical scientific instruments, today still preserved in the Physics Museum of the Liceo “Bonaventura Secusio” in Caltagirone, a study that we have already published ( Mantovani & Bartolotta, 2016). The Liceo was founded in 1864 but its history is older and dates back to the late eighteenth century when the ancient Regia Accademia “Ferdinando IV” (later known as Academy of Studies) was reopened to studies in Caltagirone. Our interest in the history of this Academy started when we discovered that the historical collection preserved an important unit of scientific instruments, bought in Paris in the years 1844-1846 from the French instrument maker Louis-Joseph Deleuil (1795-1862). This discovery inspired us to reconstruct the history of the R. Academy of Studies in order to identify the internal organization of its studies. In particular, our main aim was to identify the origins of the experimental physics in the Academy. As part of this latest research we came across the personality of Giovanni Silio Borremans who inaugurated the chair of experimental physics in 1775 and kept it for over fifty years, retiring only in 1826.

In 1570, on the initiative of the senate of Caltagirone a Jesuit boarding school, with the aim of educating the youth1, was created.

The aforementioned school, under the obligations of the “Ratio Studiorum”, was structured in two cycles of studies, the second of which, also known as “General Study”, gave to the student the opportunity to obtain respectively the baccalaureate, the diploma and the doctorate. In 1622, at the Jesuit Lyceo, the “Studia Superiora” were instituted, thanks to a new initiative subsidized by the municipal council of Caltagirone and granted by the king of Spain, Felipe IV, and the boarding school was promoted to University of Studies.

The Lyceo thus came up as a peripheral university department since the attendance of the classes, certified by the dean and the senate of Caltagirone, gave the students the “license of candidacy for doctoral degrees”, that is, a certificate of qualification which allowed the possibility to obtain the doctoral degree at the universities of the kingdom.

In 1628 the Jesuits obtained the addition of two new courses of study, the theological and the philosophical one (Taranto Rosso, 1857: p. 65). It is very likely that the teaching of physical sciences in Caltagirone began in the philosophical course, however, no documentation has emerged.

In 1767 the Jesuits were expelled from Sicily and, in 1768, all their goods, including Caltagirone’s boarding school2, were confiscated by the “Regio Erario”.

After the Jesuits were expelled, for Ferdinand IV’s will, a new project to regulate education, was developed by the bourbon government.

There was the creation of new boarding schools called “Academies of Studies”, some of which were provided with university3 courses, held both by ecclesiastical and laic professors.

Thus, in 1775, the renewed boarding school in Caltagirone was called “Ferdinand IV Royal Academy”4, which will be known in the future as R. Academy of Studies (Figure 1 & Figure 2).

As we will see, this important institution has benefited from subsidies by the city senate for more than eighty years.

Since the beginning, even with economic difficulties, the Jesuit boarding school was able to maintain the capacity to award diplomas and academic grades but, since 1825, the teaching rules have changed. In that year, a plan to reform the studies at all the boarding schools and the academies of the island was elaborated by the “Public Instruction and Education’s Commission” in Palermo.

The reform of the Academies of Siracusa, Trapani, Caltagirone, Piazza Armerina and Acireale primed at the suppression of some disciplines and the separation in individual teaching of these subjects: “physics, arithmetic with elements of algebra and geometry”, “philosophy, algebra and trigonometry”, “oratory and rhetoric” (Taranto Rosso, 1857: p. 88; Crimi, 1981: p. 92). The only structures allowed to confer the doctoral grades became the Universities of Palermo and Catania (Villari, 1980: pp. 41-42) and after fifty years of honourable service, in the field of higher education, the ancient R. Academy of Studies in Caltagirone lost the “Status” of provincial university and was transformed into a secondary school course, preparatory to university studies in the human and scientific fields. It maintained the same “Status” until 1858 when, at the request of the senate of Caltagirone, approved by King Ferdinand II, the Royal Academy was transformed into a new high school, that would have had once again the possibility to award the licence to academic grades for any university of the kingdom. It was called “Liceo Ferdinando” and it was dedicated to King Ferdinand II. The new high school remained active until 1862, when it was definitively suppressed by the Casati law (1859). Going back to 1775, the year of its establishment, the Academy was provided with a new “Studium” and two new teachings were instituted: “Logic and Metaphysics” and “Physics and Sublime Calculus” (Taranto Rosso, 1841: p. 159; Taranto Rosso, 1857: p. 87, notes 73). The Logic and Metaphysics’ chair was assigned to religious Giuseppe Vinciguerra (Narbone & Taranto Rosso, 1871: p. 95), whereas the one of “Physics and Sublime Calculus” was inaugurated by Giovanni Silio Borremans a nineteen years old promising teacher, from Palermo.

About this talented scholar, not mentioned in the most recent historical repertories of the sector5, we have little biographical information. We know about his eulogy, uttered by his friend, the baron Camemi Martino Caldarera (1772-1857), but no trace of the written text has been found. The only information found comes from some manuscript6 documents and from a printed note written in 1841 by his most illustrious student and successor to his teaching post, Professor Emmanuello7 Taranto Rosso8 (Taranto Rosso, 1841: pp. 158-162). Sixteen years later, after that note, Taranto will write these short lines in memory of his beloved teacher:

“Giovanni Silio, brother of the conspicuous Michele and Guglielmo, my predecessor, put the vastness and profoundness of his philosophical and mathematical studies together. A person of rare morality and kindness and a good writer in prose and in poetry both in the Latin and in the Italian language. It is said that he has aroused the vagueness of physical sciences and conspired to forn the culture of amusing letters, during half century, that he spent teaching (Taranto Rosso, 1857: p. 88).

Born in Palermo in 1756 to Maria9 Borremans, Giovanni had four brothers Salvatore, Francesco, Michele e Guglielmo. Among these brothers only Michele and Guglielmo distinguished themselves in their professions10 (Figure 3). During his youth, Giovanni studied in Palermo at the Jesuits archiepiscopal seminary having as his guide, his older brother, Michele, and as schoolmates Gaetano Filangeri and Rosario Gregorio11. By his brothers’ will, he initially devoted himself to the studies of law but, realized a certain aversion to the subject, he directed himself to the study of physics. His brother, Guglielmo Silio Borremans, who will die in Napoli in 1794, took up the mathematician’s career instead, becoming professor at the “Royal Academy” of Trapani, then at the “Nunziatella’s Royal Military Academy” (1787) in Naples. Guglielmo wrote about the living forces, studied ballistics and projectiles’ movement. Domenico Scinà, a physicist

and historian of Sicily, outlining his scientific figure, highlighted two contributions (Scinà, 1859: pp. 340-342). In the first writing Scinà states that Guglielmo went against the teaching of the religious and mathematician Giovanni Battista Nicolai (1726-1793), of the University of Palermo, who insisted on teaching new analysis’ rules by considering as false those established up until that time (Silio Borremans, 1787). As regards the second contribution Scinà highlights that Guglielmo Silio wrote a curious essay about the influence of analysis on political and economic sciences, applied to contraband, in which he demonstrated, using algebra, how the government should prorate punishments to the different kinds of contrabands (Silio Borremans, 1792). After the Jesuits were expelled, the need to reopen the suppressed Jesuit schools was perceived. Due to the existence of numerous vacant tenures, the “Public Education” in Palermo announced various public exams and within them the one of Physics and Mathematics, to the benefit of the newly founded “Royal Academy of Studies” in Caltagirone. Having completed and won the public exams, Giovanni Silio obtained from the government the assignment of reopening the new school of Physics and Superior or Sublime Calculus in Caltagirone.

The new courses started in November 1775. Thus Silio began his teaching of Physics and Sublime Calculus12 with a good annual salary of 180 ducats. After a few years, due to problems with the state budget, his annual salary was decreased to 108 ducats. Despite the pay cut, he continued to teach with great dedication and proficiency, as he always did with perseverance during his fervid educational activity at the Academy that lasted for more than fifty years. During that time, he gave various academic speeches, for example, in July 1778 “On the origin of thunders and lightning” and in August 1783 “On astrology”. During his early years of teaching Silio was a victim of a serious event, that dates some years after 1782 and was narrated by Taranto13 (Taranto Rosso, 1841: p. 159), whose information and details, unfortunately, are almost totally unknown. According to the concise report of his biographer, Silio, had always carried out his teaching with a modern approach against the peripatetic ideas, at that time largely dominant. He was at first discredited for his actions, then defamed and called back in Palermo in front of the “Supreme Deputation of Public Education” and it was presided by Prince of Torremuzza. The Commission, acknowledging the falsity of the accusations, not only recognised the young professor as a good teacher, but also offered him the opportunity to get the physics-mathematic tenure at the University of Palermo, then still vacant. Silio renounced preferring to continue his teaching in Caltagirone, because he loved the city. In 1794, being in Naples, after his brother’s death14, he participated in a competitive exam for the vacant general physics’ position at the University of Catania, passing and winning it. However, the government denied him the position, assigning him only an annual income of 36 onzas, state money, though this would add up to the salary of 60 onzas (Taranto Rosso, 1841: p. 160).

In 1804, with the approval seal of the senate, Silio became a citizen of Caltagirone for his scientific and literary credits. He taught at the academy until February 1826, after then he asked to be relieved from his position in order to work full time on a course of transcendental physics15 (Taranto Rosso, 1841: p. 161) about which, unfortunately, we didn’t find any information among his manuscripts.

On June 23, 1826, he was granted the permission to retire and his exit salary corresponded to 5626 annual onzas, pointing out that 5202 would be deposited by the municipality and 424 by Palermo’s Royal University of Studies16. Three days later the chair of Physics left vacant by Silio was put out to public contest by the Municipality of Caltagirone (Figure 4). During the last years of his life he began composing a written work, “The principles of physics” and, as Taranto

informs, “the first sheet of paper was under the printing press” when Silio died on April 19, 1830¹⁷.

According to some sources, he lived his whole life without fixed abode and was claimed by various noble families from Caltagirone, which hosted him¹⁸.

Learned and of extended erudition, during his 51 years of teaching, Silio formed very many pupils of all social classes, some of which would then distinguish themselves in their professions, such as Baron Cameni or the successor to his post and his main biographer, Emanuele Taranto Rosso.

In his personal library he had hundreds of books on various subjects that he would have liked to donate to Public Library in Caltagirone, which actually didn’t happen because he didn’t leave any will. In addition to physical and mathematical disciplines he also had an interest in economics¹⁹, he knew Latin and Greek very well and loved to compose poetry²⁰. From 1824 he was correspondent member of the Gioenia Academy of Natural Sciences in Catania (Figure 5).

The “corpus” of Silio’s writings is completely hand written. There is only one exception of a printed work, the “Theory on aerostats’ direction”21 (Silio Borremans, 1790), posthumous work of the end of the 1700s, published in 1841, thanks to his biographer Emanuele Taranto Rosso22. In an introduction to the article, the latter informs that the autograph manuscript, without illustrations and in a precarious state of preservation, had been held by his student and friend Baron Camemi, after Silio’s death. The baron reconsidered it when he knew about the invention made by the mechanic and aeronaut Muzio Muzzi from Bologna, who in 1838 had built a particular model of air balloon, with a lenticular form, called “rettiremiga” airship (Figure 6). In addition to it, in the same

note, Taranto affirmed:

“The author [Silio] dictated these thoughts few years after air balloons’ invention, around 1790, at the same time when thanks to illustrious P. Di Clasi, he worked on the new collection of Sicilian pamphlets, and would have liked to include them, but something wrong impeded him from doing it” (Silio Borremans, 1790: p. 162).

In fact, it seems that Silio had sent his work to the priest Salvatore Di Blasi, founder and editor of the “New collection of Sicilian Authors pamphlets”23, from 1788 to 1796, but he didn’t receive any encouraging answer from him because “I didn’t have any other encouragement, apart from a simple approval”. But why was Silio interested in the physics of the aerostats? The history and events of the rettiremigan airship lead us to the end of the 1700s and the numerous attempts, proposal and projects proposed after Montgolfier, to solve the long-standing problem of aerostats’ steering. In fact the balloons were left at the mercy of the atmospheric currents, except for the stages of rising and descent, and without any solution to this pivotal problem, the bright invention risked to remain an end in itself for its undeniable scarce usefulness. Since 1783 the attempts were numerous and lasted throughout the 1800s. Probably Silio was stricken by the very first ascensions in Sicily. Thanks to the gazettes of the time the news of the Montgolfier brothers’ ascension arrived also in Sicily, particularly in Palermo. A French book (Heubach, 1784), printed in Losanna and featured with some illustrations fed the anxious curiosity of the people from Palermo about the new invention. Various attempts to reproduce the invention, described by the French newspapers, were made by the engineers and professors of the university of Palermo but the “taffetevole” balloon, as the chronicles of the time called it, was never able to take off (Scinà, 1827: p. 68).

The venture, thanks to the correct calculation of the weight and the balloon’s structures, was instead accomplished on March 14, 1784 by Prince of Pietraperzia, D. Ercole Michele Branciforti (Cannella, 1784), who later will become Prince of Butera. But almost certainly the venture that mostly inspired Silio’s interest was the one accomplished in 1790 by an intrepid aerostat from Lucca, Vincenzo Lunardi, who had already made thirteen ascensions in Europe (Figure 7). After an unsuccessful attempt, Lunardi, on July 31, 1790, ascended in the sky of Palermo with his aerostatic balloon returning after a flight of almost two hours with a dramatic landing (Pitrè, 1904: pp. 42-43, Vol. II). The compatibility of time between Silio’s work and Lunardi’s ascension and the epilogue of the landing at about thirty kilometres from the departure point due to the aeronaut’s substantial inability to steer flight, could corroborate the hypothesis of a tight relationship between the two events. Unfortunately, Silio’s work lacks explicatory illustrations and as a consequence the airship model turns out to be unclear, even to a careful reading. From a methodological standpoint, he combined principles of physics and mathematics with some analogical models, deduced from everyday experience. The balloon descibed was probably the typical hot-air even if the burner is not described. The new elements introduced by Silio was the shuttle that could be piloted through some hand-driven devices basically deduced by the analogical models of a rowing boat and fishes movement. Fishes move thanks to the tail’s continuous movement. Silio added to the shuttle’s stern a tail-like unit made half of wood and half of “leather”, filled up with hydrogen or “inflammable air” as it was called at the time and that in some way could operate as a wheel. He then added two special oars made half of wood and half of leather

bags filled up with hydrogen to the sides of the shuttle. With regard to the theory of shuttle’s movement through atmospheric currents, Silio opted for an analogical scheme similar to the pneumatic pump, for a possible explanation. According to him, the viscous air currents produced inside the two whirlwind units of a pneumatic pump, produced the same turbulence conditions underwent by the shuttle. This and also the others ideas produced by Silio, clearly outline the heuristic models he used to design the new hot-air balloon. However, as far as the rediscovered manuscripts are concerned, it doesn’t turn out that he tested his project with any real attempt.

Silio didn’t like publishing his researches24 very much. Fortunately, however, his manuscripts were preserved, by his successor to the chair of physics, Taranto Rosso (Figure 8).

A careful and long-lasting archive work has allowed us to identify a big part of those manuscripts²⁵, which also include a limited number of letters (see note 6) coming from his personal correspondence²⁶. They deal with a wide spectrum of scientific problems, but we can also find some poems and philosophical works. Among the scientific manuscripts works of geometry, mathematics and astronomy stand out. Some of these works have come to us in the form of copies dictated by Silio to his most famous pupil, Emanuele Taranto Rosso. It is the case, for example, of the “Treatise of composed equations by the method of Sir D.ⁿ Giovanni Silio, Professor of Physics, and Sublime Calculus at the Royal Academy

of Studies in Caltagirone, 1819-20”²⁷ (Figure 9). However the most significant manuscripts are about the teaching of physics thanks to the presence of manuscripts in the form of notes, lecture and essays, the latter largely incomplete or not found²⁸.

From 1776 to 1805 as regard to the method adopted, Silio made use of dictations in “a refined Latin language” for his students and, after that period, he continued the dictation of his lessons in Italian (Taranto Rosso, 1841: p. 161; Narbone & Taranto Rosso, 1871: p. 111). According to Taranto, Silio used to modify his manuscript work, course after course, in order to consider the changing and tumultuous progresses of the science in his time. Among the numerous manuscripts consulted, the only one that presents a certain completeness and coherence of exposition is the work “Institutiones Physicae Generalis et Particularis29 (Figures 10-13). Reading the index, the work turns out to be divided into two parts philosophiae naturalis institutiones30, organised in twelve chapters31, and Phisica Particularis32, organised in eighteen chapters33.

Comparing the various manuscripts found we understand that the topics treated had to be part of a basic course of physics held by Silio between 1776 and 1805.

This certainty originates from the founding of many copies, often incomplete and written in different styles of the Institutiones Physicae, some of them ascribable to Silio³⁴ himself, others transcribed by his pupils³⁵. The work we consulted consists of about 600 pages and it is structured in definitions, theorems and corollaries according to the method of Newtonian philosophy. It limited, as Euclidean deductive rules used to do, the theory to propositions, but without help from geometry and mathematics.

In the first introductive chapter the nature and the subdivision of physics, the Newtonian rules in philosophy and the reason for setting up experiments are discussed.

In the “corpus” of Silio’s manuscripts, written in Italian, numerous copies of his lessons of physics are also found. Among them a complete manuscript written in 1818 by one of his students³⁶ (Figure 18) and a complete work in two volumes³⁷, dated 1819-1820, (Figure 19) written by his most famous pupil and successor, Emanuele Taranto Rosso stands out. This last work deserves a brief description. The first book is entitled “About Physics that is Natural Philosophy. Treatise on the method of sir D.ⁿ Giovanni Silio, Professor of this science at the Royal Academy of Studies in Caltagirone. Written in Caltagirone by Emmanuele

M.a Taranto Rosso, in the year 1819” (Figure 20). The work consists of about 480 pages. Its structure is still axiomatic and takes inspiration from the Newtonian38 model of the Principia and “from the way of debating using induction, without which no progress could be made in Natural Philosophy” (Silio Borremans, 1819: p. 19). In the introduction the structure of natural philosophy is analytically defined, in its various meanings, as a didactic introduction to the

study of the subject39. The topics, divided into thirteen chapters and in paragraphs, concern the classification and the most common properties of bodies, motion and forces, terrestrial elements and phenomenon, animal breathing and heat, static electricity.

The approach is still that typical of “Physica Generalis” that is, completely qualitative, with brief historical references to the physics of philosophers of ancient times compared to some protagonists of the science of the 1600s and 1700s. In his exposition Silio cites and points out that he knows important scientists of his time as Musschenbroek, Leeuwenhoek, Desaguliers, Hauksbee, Gravesande, Poleni, Franklin e Nollet. Starting from chapter V there are also, scattered and inserted in the text, fifteen illustrations of scientific instruments (Figures 21-23), drew by Taranto Rosso. The last two chapters, of only twenty pages, are about phenomena of static electricity and some simple measuring instruments40 such as Hauksbee’s electrostatic machine, the electrophorus, Leida’s bottles and batteries, the electrometers of Volta, Henley, Cavallo and Bennet, Coulomb’s scale and the electric ringing.

The second book of the work is entitled “Essay about physical-mathematics. Second book of physics by sir D. Giovanni Silio, professor of physics at the Royal Academy of Studies in Caltagirone, 1820” (Figure 24). The manuscript is a remarkable didactic work thanks to its strong mathematical approach⁴¹, a characteristic

that is rarely found in printed works of the time. The essay must be read as a direct testimony of the approach and methods used in teaching physical-mathematics42 in a provincial and decentralized university, as was the R. Academy of Caltagirone, before the reform of 1825. The course remains anchored to the tradition of the end of the 1700s, the so-called “mixed-mathematics” that mainly concerned mechanics, hydrostatics, hydraulics and optics, subjects that had already reached a formal mathematical structured compared to the younger Baconian sciences such as electricity, magnetism and heat. The teaching method was borrowed by that of pure mathematics whose conclusions had axioms and definitions as constructive foundations. Silio, who had the formation of a good mathematician, adopted the same explicative method in his dissertation. The formal structure of the theory, based on definitions, theorems and corollaries, had to bring to indisputable conclusions confirmed by few and selected experimental facts. The manuscript is divided into two parts and is characterized by having a rich iconography of images43 inserted in the text (Figures 25-27), to support calculations and geometrical demonstrations. The first part, of 289 pages, is divided into 27 chapters and is definitely the most interesting of the essay thanks to its strict mathematical approach. It mainly deals with the following subjects: motions and their compositions, gravity, machine’s theory, hydrostatics, hydraulics, levels and aerometer, simple and compound pendulum, central forces, projectiles motion, theory of collisions. In many chapters Silio briefly describes some

experimental facts, of which he demonstrates the theory, then he goes to the direct verification of experiments. Thus in the case of bodies in free fall, due to gravity and of motion “equitably accelerated” Silio asserts:

“The propositions we demonstrated about the space covered by bodies subject to gravity prove to be uniform to experience using machines. You observed that invented by Nollet who was pushed by the example of Gravesande; but the best among those invented is the one of Sir Atwood” (Silio Borremans, 1820: p. 65).

In his accurate exposition of facts Silio would also like to describe the scientific instruments used in the experiments but he lacks the time⁴⁴. With regard to physical quantities and forces, Silio correctly uses the concept of vector, its components and the parallelogram’s rule. For example in the analysis of a body’s motion on an inclined plane he correctly approaches the problem by decomposing the weight force⁴⁵. Interesting is also the chapter dedicated to the general analysis of the central forces in curvilinear motion, separated into centrifugal and centripetal forces⁴⁶. In particularly the study of planets’ motion developed by using the theory of conics, is very accurate. It was a topic that Silio knew very well for having tought it in 1820⁴⁷. The second part of the essay, of 184 pages, is divided into five chapters and is entitled “About the doctrine of light”. The topics treated concern a general introduction to optics, catoptrics, classification of lenses (Figure 28), colours, telescopes, microscopes and some dioptric and catoptric machines. The general approach is quite discursive and certainly less mathematical than the first part of the essay. The geometrical and algebraic demonstrations, with the exception of the theory of lenses, are almost absent. Therefore, theorems are lacking, however a very linear expositive order, through the experienced schema of definitions and corollaries remains. The main value of the exposition lies in the rich apparatus of images drawn manually, they are about eighty, and they really facilitate the comprehension of topics. The chapter dedicated to colours is the most experimental one, because it is based on a detailed description of ten experiments carried out in a darkroom. With the help of a “scioptic ball” Silio studies the phenomena of refraction and dispersion of a solar ray combining prisms, lenses and thin laminas (Figure 29).

The chapter ends with a study extended to the big atmospheric phenomena; he particularly goes into a detailed explanation of the rainbow adducing some historical explication. The last topics treated shows some lacks of text and images and so they are incomplete, as if Silio didn’t have enough time to conclude his course.

For the present work, a large number of unpublished manuscripts have been consulted at the Municipal Library “E. Taranto”, manuscripts room, in Caltagirone. The records related to the whole Silio’s corpus of manuscripts are collected on the shelves VII, XIII, XIV. These are the funds consulted for this study: funds “Randazzini V”, “Taranto’s correspondence”, “Manoscritti Silio Guglielmo Corrispondenza varia”, “Varie Taranto”, “Giovanni Silio’s biographical notes”. In particular, the following manuscripts have been consulted:

Institutiones Physicae Generalis et Particularis. The work has no a title (it was rebuilt thanks to a quotation by Taranto Rosso) and it is not dated (about the end of XVIII century). The work is divided into two parts: Philosophiae Naturalis Institutiones and Phisica Particularis.

Institutiones Physicae Generalis et Particularis. Incomplete copy, dated 1808 by a pupil of Silio, Josephi Strazzuso. The title page of the work contains the following text: “Ex meis manuscriptis D. Joseph Strazzuso. Ex Libris G. S. D^ris Dⁿ Josephi Strazzuso Anno Domini Millesimo octinaentesimo octavo”. On the next page there is the following note: “Cathedram moderante in R. Studiorum Academia Calatagirone Joanne Silio”.

Codice. Della Fisica, o Filosofia Naturale dettata in Caltagirone da D.ⁿ Giovanni Silio nel 1818. Copy of a Silio’s pupil signed “S. M.”. Under the title has been transcribed a poetic “Sonetto”.

Della Fisica ossia Filosofia Naturale Trattato sul Metodo del Signor D.ⁿ Giovanni Silio Professore di essa Scienza nella Regia Accademia de’ Studi di Caltagirone. Tomo Primo. In Caltagirone scritta da Emmanuele M.^a Taranto, e Rosso nell’Anno 1819.

Trattato delle Sezioni Coniche sul metodo del signor D.ⁿ Giovanni Silio Pubblico Professore di Fisica Matematica e Geometria sublimiore nella Regia Accademia de’ Studi della Città di Caltagirone. Nell’Anno del Signore 1820. Per uso di Emmanuele M.^a Taranto e Rosso Discente delle superiori Scienze.

Della Fisico-Matematica Trattato. Tomo Secondo della Fisica del S.^r D. Giovanni Silio Professore di Fisica nella R. Accademia de’ Studi in Caltagirone 1820.

Trattato di Equazioni Composte Secondo il Metodo del Signor D. Giovanni Silio, Professore di Fisica, e Matematica Sublime nella R. Accademia di Caltagirone 1819-20. On the bottom of the page, handwritten, reads: “Da’ Mss di Emmanuello Taranto Rosso”.

(1827-1860), Royal Academy of Studies “Ferdinando” whose organization depends on the Commission of Education and Public Education which is resident in Palermo. Various news about the disciplines imparted in the said Academy and in other institutes; on the teachers ecc., manuscripts (miscellany with spread sheets), “Pubblica Istruzione e Cultura—Reale Accademia degli Studi—Scuole Sussidi e Borse di Studio” n˚ XXXII, fasc. 756, Municipal Library E. Taranto, Caltagirone.

(1831-1837) “Giornale per la R. Accademia degli Studi di Caltagirone incominciando da novembre 1831 sotto la direzione del Sig.r Cav. D. Emanuello Taranto Rosso”; book of bills dated 1/1/1832, manuscripts, room F. A., Shelf XIV, Pal a N. ord. 2.1, Municipal Library E. Taranto, Caltagirone.

(1842-1853), Royal Academy of Studies—Various, manuscripts (miscellany with spread sheets), Records, cat. 9, class 5, fasc. 3, Bibl. XXXII/1-759, Municipal Library E. Taranto, Caltagirone.

(1850), Royal Academy of Studies. Professors: qualifications and titles required, manuscripts (miscellany with spread sheets), Records, cat. 9, class 5, fasc. 3, Municipal Library E. Taranto, Caltagirone.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Mantovani, R., & Bartolotta, D. (2019). A Forgotten Italian Physicist at the Turn of the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: The Sicilian Giovanni Silio Borremans. Advances in Historical Studies, 8, 148-174. https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2019.84012