<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2019.99048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-94848</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Dermatophytes Species Isolated of HIV-Infected Patients Identified by ITS-RFLP and ITS Region Sequencing from Triangulo Mineiro, Minas Gerais State of Brazil
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thatiana</surname><given-names>Bragine-Ferreira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luiz</surname><given-names>S&amp;eacute;rgio de Lima-J&amp;uacute;nior</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Larissa</surname><given-names>Beatriz Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leonardo</surname><given-names>Eur&amp;iacute;pedes Andrade-Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Delio</surname><given-names>Jos&amp;eacute; Mora</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bruno</surname><given-names>Siqueira Prudente</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kennio</surname><given-names>Ferreira-Paim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabiana</surname><given-names>Almeida Ara&amp;uacute;jo Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luiz</surname><given-names>Ricardo Goulart</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mario</surname><given-names>Le&amp;oacute;n Silva-Vergara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Infectious Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Triangulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Microbiology, Tri&amp;amp;acire;ngulo Mineiro Federal University, Uberaba, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Laboratory of Nanobiotechnology, Institute of Biotechnology, Federal University of Uberl&amp;amp;acire;ndia, Uberl&amp;amp;acire;ndia, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>790</fpage><lpage>803</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Dermatomycoses are a group of diseases worldwide distributed and affect skin, hair and nails. Several fungal species can be envolved and keratinophilic fungi belonging to the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton are very common. These infections are globally distributed and their incidence has progressively increased. Despite their high incidence, few studies have been carried out in HIV-infected patients, regarding frequency, clinical presentations, and species identification. This study aimed to evaluate some epidemiological and clinical aspects of dermatophytosis in HIV-infected patients and to attempt phenotypical and molecular characteristics of their agents. Of 398 patients included, 306 were HIV-infected. Clinical data and samples of skin, hair and nail lesions were simultaneously obtained. The dermatophytes yielded in culture were phenotypically identified and evaluated by ITS-RFLP and ITS (Internal Transcribed Space) sequencing. Dermatophytes frequency in HIV-infected patients with cutaneous lesions was 11.76% similar to the 15.22% observed in non-HIV individuals. 
  Trichophyton rubrum was the most common isolated species in both groups. Throught ITS-RFLP, 29/32 (90.63%) of dermatophytes isolates were identified at the species level. From the 10 isolates randomly selected for ITS sequencing, seven confirmed the ITS-RFLP results while three 
  Trichophyton sp. were not identified as dermatophytes. The identification of these species in HIV-infected patients is highly desirable in order to improve the knowledge of their frequency, geographical distribution and relation to clinical presentation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dermatophytosis</kwd><kwd> Dermatophytes</kwd><kwd> ITS-RFLP</kwd><kwd> ITS-Sequencing</kwd><kwd> HIV-Infected Patients</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Trichophyton rubrum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dermatomycoses are common cutaneous infections of keratinized tissues, caused by several fungal species which invade the corneous layer of skin, hair and nails. Among these, keratinophilic fungi belonging to the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton are very common. These infections are globally distributed and their incidence has progressively increased [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref1">1</xref>] . According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 20% - 25% of the world population has some kind of cutaneous fungal infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>These infections can have acute or chronic clinical presentation, depending on the degree of inflammation and it is hypothesized that these mycoses trend to be more frequent and severe in immunocompromised individuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref6">6</xref>] . The HIV infection is one of the most important risk factors to the occurrence of fungal infections and due to the scarcity of data, the prevalence, clinical features, diagnosis and outcome of the dermatomycosis in HIV-infected individuals are still unclear [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref7">7</xref>] . Moreover, cellular immunity is pivotal in the control of these infections and Th1 and Th2 responses balance can determinate the progression of the infection in such patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The taxonomy of dermatophytes remained confused for a long time, until the discovery of the sexual reproduction in keratinophilic species, which led to the introduction of the biological concept of species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref10">10</xref>] . With the advent of molecular biology, conventional morphological taxonomy was influenced by data obtained DNA sequencing which improved the taxonomic system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref11">11</xref>] . One of the sequencing targets is the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA, which is considered the main barcode of the fungal kingdom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref13">13</xref>] . Furthermore, the sequencing of different genes, specially using the genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition (GCPSR) can be useful to improve fungal diagnosis, biodiversity range, species conservation and taxonomy accuracy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The present report aimed to evaluate some epidemiological and clinical aspects of dermatophytosis in HIV-infected patients and to attempt characterizes phenotipic and molecular aspects of their etiological agents in a teaching hospital from Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Population and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Population</title><p>This study was carried out at the Infectious Diseases Outpatient Unit in a Brazilian Teaching Hospital from August 2014 to December 2015. A total of 398 adult patients of both genders were randomicaly recruited and divided into three groups: I composed by 153 HIV-infected individuals with skin, hair or nail lesions, II composed by 153 HIV-infected without apparent clinical lesions in these sites and III composed by 92 non-HIV-patients with clinical lesions similar to group I seen at the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic of the same hospital. The inclusion criteria were: both genders, age over 18 years, that was receiving antiretroviral therapy and agree to participate of the study. Those who referred antifungal use within 30 days prior to the recruitment or disagreed to participate were excluded.</p><p>Epidemiological and clinical data of the HIV-infected patients with dermatomycosis were registered and a clinical exam was performed. Nail and cutaneous samples were obtained by scraping while hair fragments were obtainied by removing a small amount of hair containing their bulb. Concomitantly, nail scrapings samples of the 153 HIV-infected without clinical lesions were obtained.</p><p>These clinical samples were examined by direct microscopic using potassium hydroxide 20% (KOH) in order to identify fungal structures. Then, they were seeded in Sabouraud Dextrose Agar added with 0.05 mg∙mL<sup>−1</sup> chloramphenicol and Mycosel Agar, incubated at 28˚C &#177; 2˚C and observed for up to 30 days. Identification of the yielded filamentous fungi was carried out using the microculture technique in Potato Dextrose Agar for seven days at room temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Molecular Identification of Isolates</title><p>The DNA extraction was performed by the phenol-chloroform method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref14">14</xref>] . Then, a PCR reaction of the ITS region of ribosomal DNA was performed using ITS-1 and ITS-4 primers as previously described with modifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref15">15</xref>] . Briefly, each reaction contained a final volume of 50 μL with 50 ng of template DNA, 5 μL of the 1X PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 0.1%, 1.5 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>), 0.25 mM dNTP’s (dATP, dCTP, dGTPe dTTP), 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen, Brazil) and 70 pmol of each primer. The PCR was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94˚C (3 min) followed by 29 cycles with denaturation at 94˚C (30 s), association at 57˚C (30 s), extension at 72˚C (45 s) and one cycle 10 minutes at 72˚C.</p><p>Next, the DNA was digested using the restriction enzyme MvaI Fast Digest (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fragments were detected by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel at 80 V for 2 hours. The profiles were visually identified by comparison with the restriction patterns already described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref17">17</xref>] . The strain ATCC MYA4439 of Trichophyton interdigitale was used as a positive control.</p><p>The amplified DNA of ten randomly selected isolates was submitted to the sequencing reaction using the BigDye terminator 3.1 reagent kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences obtained were analyzed in the software Chromas-pro 1.5 and then compared with the available data in the National Center of Biotechnological Information (NCBI—Nacional Center for Biotechnolgy Information), including sequences of reference strains. Multiple alignments were performed in the Clustal W software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref18">18</xref>] . The best model used in the phylogenetic tree was chosen from the software JModel test using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The Tamura Nei substitution model with Gamma distribution was the best model for the aligned dataset and used to construct the phylogenetic tree. The phylogenetic analysis was performed in the MEGA 7.0 software with the Maximum likelihood method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref19">19</xref>] . The Bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was used to support the tree nodes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data analysis was performed using Epi Info software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 7.0, USA) and GraphPad Prism (version 5.0, USA). The verification of normal distribution of the quantitative variables was done by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean &#177; standard deviation and those with ab-normal distribution were expressed in median, with maximum, minimum and percentiles values. Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate the differences and frequencies among groups. Values of p &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p>The project was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Tri&#226;ngulo Mineiro Federal University in Uberaba, Minas Gerais State, Brazil under protocol number: 1716.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Of 306 HIV-infected patients, 178 (58.17%) were male (mean age: 43.86 &#177; 12.24 years) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). Of 153 HIV patients with cutaneous, hair or nails lesions, in 61 (39.87%) at least one fungal structure was observed by direct examination whereas in 72 (47.06%) of cases a positive fungal culture was obtained. The presence of skin, hair or nail lesions was significantly associated with the chance to obtain a positive fungal direct exam or culture (p &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>).</p><p>Of 92 non-HIV patients evaluated, 55 (59.78%) were female (mean age: 52.64 &#177; 13.63 years). Of these, 43 (46.74%) and 48 (52.17%) presented a fungal positive direct exam and culture, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref>).</p><p>Among the recovered fungal isolates, 32 were phenotypically identified as dermatophytes, of which 18 (56.25%) were obtained from HIV-infected patients while the remaining 14 (43.75%) were from non-HIV patients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1).</p><p>The frequency of dermatophytes in HIV-infected patients with clinical lesions (11.76%) was similar to that observed in non-HIV patients (15.22%) (p = 0.4406). Trichophyton rubrum was predominant followed by Trichophyton interdigitale in both groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1).</p><p>Of the 18 HIV-infected patients with dermatophytes isolation, 14 (77.78%) were males (mean age: 48.22 years) while the 9 (64.29%) of the 14 non-HIV patients with isolated dermathophytes were female (mean age: 50.93 years). Most individuals were from urban areas and had a low scholar level. Other epidemiological and clinical data are described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Main demographic, epidemiological and clinical data of the HIV-infected and Non-HIV patient groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected patients (n = 306)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-HIV patients (n = 92)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average (&#177;SD**)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.86 (&#177;12.24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.64 (&#177;13.63)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178 (58.17%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (40.22%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete elementary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (15.06%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4.35%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete elementary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168 (54.90%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (34.78%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete high school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 (14.38%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (34.78%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete high school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (6.54%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (4.35%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete college</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (2.61%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (9.78%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete college</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (1.96%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (5.43%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (4.58%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (6.52%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 (22.22%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (21.74%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (17.32%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (22.83%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (10.31%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (3.26%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (1.63%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.09%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111 (36.27%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (48.91%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (12.42%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.17%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Domicile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275 (89.87%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 (92.39%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (10.13%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (7.61%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swimming/pool practices*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (13.86%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (23.91%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin/nail lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 (100%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous history of skin/nail lesions*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134 (44.23%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (67.39%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159 (52.47%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (30.43%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unknown</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (3.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.17%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Underlying diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 (42.48%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (54.35%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency of the contact with animals*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Common</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157 (51.82%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (38.04%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Often</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (8.58%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (10.87%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occasional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (4.29%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (8.70%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (35.31%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (42.39%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Three patients from the HIV-infected group were excluded due to unavailable data; **SD: standard deviation.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Mycological diagnosis according with the presence or absence of skin, hair or nail lesions in HIV-infected patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Presence of lesions n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absence of lesions n (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KOH+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 (39.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (7.84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KOH−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 (60.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141 (92.16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Culture+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 (47.06)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (20.26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Culture−</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81 (52.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122 (79.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*KOH: potassium hydroxide 20%.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</label><caption><title> Epidemiological and clinical data of patients with positive culture for dermatophytes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected with cutaneous lesions n = 18 (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Non-HIV patient n = 14 (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average (range)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.22 (32 - 63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.93 (37 - 71)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (77.78)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (35.71)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of contact with animals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (55.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Underlying diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (38.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (64.29)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous skin/nail lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (72.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (71.43)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous antifungal therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (44.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (35.71)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (44.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (57.14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not reported</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (11.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.14)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T CD4<sup>+</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (44.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 to 499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (11.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (44.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Viral load (copies of RNA/mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (44.44)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 to 100,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (38.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;100.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (16.67)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NA: not available.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. ITS-RFLP</title><p>Of 32 isolated dermatophytes, 29 (90.63%) were identified at the species level by the ITS-RFLP profiles. All 18 isolates phenotypically characterized as T. rubrum were confirmed by ITS-RFLP. Of the six isolates previously identified as T. interdigitale, four presented the typical profile of this species while two were reclassified as T. rubrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Two isolates previously identified as Microsporum canis and T. verrucosum were confirmed as well (data not shown).</p><p>From the six isolates (D04, D05, D07, D22, D30 and D32) previously identified as Trichophyton sp., three (D04, D30 and D32) were confirmed as T. rubrum by the ITS-RFLP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The remaining isolates did not present any pattern of digestion by this technique.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sequencing of the ITS Region and Phylogenetic Analysis</title><p>Ten (31.25%) of isolates were randomly selected for ITS sequencing. The generated ITS fragments presented approximately 630 bp. Of these, seven (70%) were adequately confirmed being five T. rubrum and two T. interdigitale. The sequences presented 97% to 100% of identity in relation to clinical isolates from USA, Australia, India, China, Russia and Japan.</p><p>The comparison of these sequences with the 29 reference sequences from GenBank, demonstrated that the T. rubrum isolates herein identified appear to have a greater phylogenetic homegeneity in comparison to the CBS 392.58 reference</p><p>strain. Otherwise, the isolates D33 and D38 were grouped together with the anthropophilic strains of T. mentagrophytes complex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The remaining three isolates formerly identified as Trichophyton sp. by their phenotypic aspects were identified within Ascomycetes: Lecanicillium aphanocladii (MH346472), Preussia sp. (MH346502) and Montagnulaceae sp. (MH348207).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Dermatophytes comprise a group of pathogenic filamentous fungi that cause cutaneous mycoses and due to their ubiquity in nature and high transmissibility, the infections caused by these agents are often considered a neglected problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref21">21</xref>] . Currently, HIV infection is considered one of the major global public health problems and a wide gamut of diseases with cutaneous involvement in HIV-infected patients has been already reported. Due to the immunosuppresion, atypical skin lesions can lead to clinical misdiagnosis and treatment difficulties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>The relationship between dermatophytosis and HIV infection remains poorly understood, regarding their frequency, causative species and therapeutical outcome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref24">24</xref>] . Of 306 HIV-infected patients herein evaluated, 50% presented cutaneous, hair or nail lesions, often with atypical and heterogeneous appearance. Despite fungal ethiology had been suspected, other causes should be excluded and for this direct exam, culture and molecular methods are pivotal to improve the diagnosis accuracy and therapeutical decision [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref25">25</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>In the present report, 39.87% and 47.06% of HIV-infected patients with skin, hair or nail lesions presented direct exam and positive fungal culture respectively. Whereas in non-HIV individuals, 46.74% and 52.17% of cases presented direct exam and culture positive respectively. These figures were similar with those</p><p>reported from India, where the positivity rate of direct microscopy and culture were respectively 49% and 51% in 100 non-HIV patients with clinical suspicious of dermatophytosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>The frequency of dermatophytes isolation between HIV-infected patients and non-HIV individuals was similar, a finding in line with another report where 105 HIV-infected patients and 63 non-HIV individuals were evaluated. According to the authors, there was no correlation between the T CD4<sup>+</sup> cell count and the prevalence of dermatophytosis in HIV patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Although the relation of dermatophytosis and HIV-infected patients is still unclear, some authors pointed out an inverse relationship between T CD4<sup>+</sup> cells count and the frequency and extension of cutaneous lesions in these individuals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref9">9</xref>] . Most patients herein evaluated exhibited high T CD4<sup>+</sup> cell counts and undetectable viral load values, which reinforce that they presented adequate adhesion to antiretroviral therapy and partially could explain the low frequency of dermatophytes recovered despite 306 patients were evaluated. Herein and as described for other mycosis, the HIV infection can change the clinical presentation without alters the rate incidence. Maybe, the stratification of CD4<sup>+</sup> values and the inclusion of patients with advanced immunodeficiency could identify different risk categories for dermatophytes infection.</p><p>Regarding the anatomic site, the toenails and feet were the sites where dermatophytes were more frequently isolated. The severity of the nail involvement with chronic and distrophic changes and a poor antifungal response is a common clinical observation in these patients. This finding agrees with literature data and confirms the results from a recent Brazilian survey where onicomycosis and Tinea pedis were the most common clinical pictures in 84 HIV-infected patients evaluated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref27">27</xref>] . In contrast, another study from the same country described a high frequency (70%) of Tinea corporis in 20 HIV-infected patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Most dermatophytes species herein identified belong to the Trichophyton genus which is in line with other reports that point out 90% of the dermatophytosis around the world are caused by species of this genus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref30">30</xref>] . Although T. rubrum is found as the main agent of dermatophytosis in HIV-infected patients, it presents global distribution and also is the most common agent recovered from clinical specimens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>The T. verrucosum isolate was confirmed by ITS-RFLP and recovered from a patient who referred frequent contact with domestic animals. Despite this zoophilic species is an uncommon agent in humans, its isolation could be clinically relevant since it was recovered from an HIV-infected individual. This species has been commonly associated with farm activities and cattle are known as the main infection source. However, accidental transmission can also occur by contaminated objects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>The therapy to superficial mycoses in HIV/AIDS patients is usually started with topical antifungals, whereas the use of systemic drugs is recommended in cases where there is no improvement or when lesions are extensive, deep or widespread. Several reports have pointed out that oral medicaments such as terbinafine, intraconazole or fluconazole are the most appropriate therapeutic options for these individuals. According with other authors, they must be prescribed from two to six weeks except those who present oniocomycosis and require more time of treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref24">24</xref>] . Patients with dermatomycosis herein described received topical or oral itraconazole with clinical remission of their lesions except those who presented nail involvement and exhibited a poor response.</p><p>Despite, culture continues to be one of the most used methods for mycological diagnosis, the ITS-RFLP allowed the identification of 90.63% of the isolated dermatophytes at the species level. The obtained band patterns were variable in size among the different species, which allowed the visual differentiation among T. rubrum, T. interdigitale, M. canis and T. verrucosum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref17">17</xref>] . The T. rubrum complex includes species with different phenotypic characteristics, however this variability has not been homogeneously observed in molecular studies. In these cases, the restriction pattern from other DNA regions or the use of additional enzymes could increase the accuracy of the method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref33">33</xref>] . Recently, a whole-genome analysis showed a clonal population profile of this species, which may explain the genetic homogeneity of the complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref34">34</xref>] . <sup> </sup></p><p>In accordance to the current taxonomy of dermatophytes, the anthropophilic isolates are separated from the zoophilic ones constituting the T. mentagrophytes species complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref11">11</xref>] . The T. interdigitale isolates herein identified presented the same restriction pattern on ITS-RFLP and were grouped together with the anthropophilic ones in the phylogenetic analysis. A recent report with 60 clinical isolates of dermatophytes showed that the most of them belonged to the anthropophilic variant of T. mentagrophytes complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref35">35</xref>] . <sup> </sup></p><p>Despite, the DNA sequencing is a reliable technique for fungal identification species and the ITS region is relatively conserved in dermatophytes species, the combination of different genes sequencing of these species by MLST (Multilocus Sequence Typing) undoubtedly is pivotal to improve their identification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94848-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Despite the low number of isolates evaluated, the results herein showed that identification based on morphological characteristics of dermatophytes species presents high level of complexity and accuracy limitations, although it is still one of the most used method in the context of clinical mycological diagnosis. Otherwise the ITS-RFLP appears to be useful and reliable tool to identify and to differentiate dermatophytes at the species level. In addition, this technique is still cheaper and simpler than any sequencing method, especially when taking into account limited-resource settings.</p><p>Moreover, the sequencing is considered the ideal method to identify the dermatophytes with more precision at the species level and to observe their intraspecific variability. However, logistical and economical issues around the world remain as the main obstacle for its wide implementation as well.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Funding</title><p>This work was supported by Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)-grant #APQ-02633-16. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Ethical Approval</title><p>All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Authors’ Contributions</title><p>T.B.F. and M.L.S.V. conceived the study; T.B.F., L.S.L.J. and B.S.P. collected the data; T.B.F. and L.B.S. performed experiments; T.B.F., L.B.S., L.E.A.S., K.F.P. and M.L.S.V analyzed data; F.A.A.S. and L.R.G. contributed new methods; T.B.F., D.J.M., K.F.P and M.L.S.V. led the writing.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>There are no conflicts of interest to report.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bragine-Ferreira, T., de Lima-J&#250;nior, L.S., Silva, L.B., Andrade-Silva, L.E., Mora, D.J., Prudente, B.S., Ferreira-Paim, K., Santos, F.A.A., Goulart, L.R. and Silva-Vergara, M.L. (2019) Dermatophytes Species Isolated of HIV-Infected Patients Identified by ITS-RFLP and ITS Region Sequencing from Tri&#226;ngulo Mineiro, Minas Gerais State of Brazil. Advances in Microbiology, 9, 790-803. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2019.99048</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Supplementary Material</title><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> List of the of the patients and isolates identified in the study containing the anatomical site, HIV status, CD4+ count, direct microscopy, phenotypic identification, ITS-RFLP and ITS sequencing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Patient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Anatomical site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HIV status</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CD4+ T-cell count</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Direct microscopy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phenotypic identification</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ITS-RFLP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sequencing</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P201</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. verrucosum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. verrucosum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1585</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >arms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >inguinal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >trunk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >fingernails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not digested</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Montagnulaceae sp.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >930</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV-infected</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hands</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not digested</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lecanicillium aphanocladii</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >arms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. canis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. canis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >trunk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not digested</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preussia sp.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >fingernails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P397</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichophyton sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >feet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. interdigitale</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >toenails</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-HIV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T. rubrum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >not sequenced</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NA: Not available.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94848-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ameen, M. (2010) Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections. Clinics in Dermatology, 28, 197-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hube, B., Hay, R., Brasch, J., Veraldi, S. and Schaller, M. (2015) Dermatomycoses and Inflammation: The Adaptive Balance between Growth, Damage, and Survival. Journal de Mycologie M&amp;eacute;dicale, 25, e44-e58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, L.B., de Oliveira, D.B., da Silva, B.V., de Souza, R.A., da Silva, P.R., Ferreira- Paim, K., et al. (2014) Identification and Antifungal Susceptibility of Fungi Isolated from Dermatomycoses. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 28, 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.12151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Criado, P.R., Oliveira, C.B., Dantas, K.C., Takiguti, F.A., Benini, L.V. and Vasconcellos, C. (2011) Superficial Mycosis and the Immune Response Elements. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 86, 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962011000400015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marconi, V.C., Kradin, R., Marty, F.M., Hospenthal, D.R. and Kotton, C.N. (2010) Disseminated Dermatophytosis in a Patient with Hereditary Hemochromatosis and Hepatic Cirrhosis: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Medical Mycology, 48, 518-527. https://doi.org/10.3109/13693780903213512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rouzaud, C., Hay, R., Chosidow, O., Dupin, N., Puel, A., Lortholary, O., et al. (2015) Severe Dermatophytosis and Acquired or Innate Immunodeficiency: A Review. Journal of Fungi, 2, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof2010004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodwell, G.E., Bayles, C.L., Towersey, L. and Aly, R. (2008) The Prevalence of Dermatophyte Infection in Patients Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. International Journal of Dermatology, 47, 339-343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2008.03416.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almeida, S.R. (2008) Immunology of Dermatophytosis. Mycopathologia, 166, 277- 283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-008-9103-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramos, E.S.M., Lima, C.M., Schechtman, R.C., Trope, B.M. and Carneiro, S. (2010) Superficial Mycoses in Immunodepressed Patients (AIDS). Clinics in Dermatology, 28, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kawasaki, M. (2011) Verification of a Taxonomy of Dermatophytes Based on Mating Results and Phylogenetic Analyses. Medical Mycology Journal, 52, 291-295.https://doi.org/10.3314/mmj.52.291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Hoog, G.S., Dukik, K., Monod, M., Packeu, A., Stubbe, D., Hendrickx, M., et al. (2017) Toward a Novel Multilocus Phylogenetic Taxonomy for the Dermatophytes. Mycopathologia, 182, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-016-0073-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irinyi, L., Serena, C., Garcia-Hermoso, D., Arabatzis, M., Desnos-Ollivier, M., Vu, D., et al. (2015) International Society of Human and Animal Mycology (ISHAM)- ITS Reference DNA Barcoding Database—The Quality Controlled Standard Tool for Routine Identification of Human and Animal Pathogenic Fungi. Medical Mycology, 53, 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myv008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Normand, A.C., Packeu, A., Cassagne, C., Hendrickx, M., Ranque, S. and Piarroux, R. (2018) Nucleotide Sequence Database Comparison for Routine Dermatophyte Identification by Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 Genetic Region DNA Barcoding. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 56, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00046-18</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makimura, K., Tamura, Y., Mochizuki, T., Hasegawa, A., Tajiri, Y., Hanazawa, R., et al. (1999) Phylogenetic Classification and Species Identification of Dermatophyte Strains Based on DNA Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer 1 Regions. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37, 920-904.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ansari, S., Hedayati, M.T., Zomorodian, K., Pakshir, K., Badali, H., Rafiei, A., et al. (2016) Molecular Characterization and in Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of 316 Clinical Isolates of Dermatophytes in Iran. Mycopathologia, 181, 89-95.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-015-9941-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elavarashi, E., Kindo, A.J. and Kalyani, J. (2013) Optimization of PCR-RFLP Directly from the Skin and Nails in Cases of Dermatophytosis, Targeting the ITS and the 18S Ribosomal DNA Regions. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7, 646-651. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/5363.2873</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rezaei-Matehkolaei, A., Makimura, K., Shidfar, M., Zaini, F., Eshraghian, M., Jalalizand, N., et al. (2012) Use of Single-Enzyme PCR-Restriction Digestion Barcode Targeting the Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS rDNA) to Identify Dermatophyte Species. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 41, 82-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, S., Stecher, G. and Tamura, K. (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33, 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Rossi, N.M., Peres, N.T. and Rossi, A. (2017) Pathogenesis of Dermatophytosis: Sensing the Host Tissue. Mycopathologia, 182, 215-227.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-016-0057-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhan, P. and Liu, W. (2017) The Changing Face of Dermatophytic Infections Worldwide. Mycopathologia, 182, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-016-0082-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goodman, D.S., Teplitz, E.D., Wishner, A., Klein, R.S., Burk, P.G. and Hershenbaum, E. (1987) Prevalence of Cutaneous Disease in Patients with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or AIDS-Related Complex. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 17, 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(87)70193-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, X.J., Li, H.Y., Chen, D.X., Wang, X.C., Li, Z.C., Wu, Y.S., et al. (2011) Clinical Analysis of Skin Lesions in 796 Chinese HIV-Positive Patients. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 91, 552-556. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, R.A. (2000) Dermatophyte Infections in Human Immune Deficiency Virus (HIV) Disease. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 43, S135- S142. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.110631</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khadka, S., Sherchand, J.B., Pokharel, D.B., Pokhrel, B.M., Mishra, S.K., Dhital, S., et al. (2016) Clinicomycological Characterization of Superficial Mycoses from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Nepal. Dermatology Research and Practice, 2016, Article ID: 9509705. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9509705</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sen, S.S. and Rasul, E.S. (2006) Dermatophytosis in Assam. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 24, 77-78. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.19907</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">da Silva, B.C., Paula, C.R., Auler, M.E., Ruiz Lda, S., Dos Santos, J.I., Yoshioka, M.C., et al. (2014) Dermatophytosis and Immunovirological Status of HIV-Infected and AIDS Patients from Sao Paulo City, Brazil. Mycoses, 57, 371-376.https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, J.E., Neves, R.P., Delgado, M.M., Lima-Neto, R.G., Morais, V.M. and Coelho, M.R. (2015) Dermatophytosis in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection: Clinical Aspects and Etiologic Agents. Acta Tropica, 150, 111-115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Havlickova, B., Czaika, V.A. and Friedrich, M. (2008) Epidemiological Trends in Skin Mycoses Worldwide. Mycoses, 51, 2-15.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01606.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heidrich, D., Garcia, M.R., Stopiglia, C.D., Magagnin, C.M., Daboit, T.C., Vetoratto, G., et al. (2015) Dermatophytosis: A 16-Year Retrospective Study in a Metropolitan Area in Southern Brazil. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 9, 865-871.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Courtellemont, L., Chevrier, S., Degeilh, B., Belaz, S., Gangneux, J.P. and Robert-Gangneux, F. (2017) Epidemiology of Trichophyton verrucosum Infection in Rennes University Hospital, France: A 12-Year Retrospective Study. Medical Mycology, 55, 720-724. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myw142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nenoff, P., Kruger, C., Ginter-Hanselmayer, G. and Tietz, H.J. (2014) Mycology—An Update. Part 1: Dermatomycoses: Causative Agents, Epidemiology and Pathogenesis. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 12, 188- 210. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12245</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa-Orlandi, C.B., Magalhaes, G.M., Oliveira, M.B., Taylor, E.L., Marques, C.R. and de Resende-Stoianoff, M.A. (2012) Prevalence of Dermatomycosis in a Brazilian Tertiary Care Hospital. Mycopathologia, 174, 489-497.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-012-9576-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Persinoti, G.F., Martinez, D.A., Li, W., Dogen, A., Billmyre, R.B., Averette, A., et al. (2018) Whole-Genome Analysis Illustrates Global Clonal Population Structure of the Ubiquitous Dermatophyte Pathogen Trichophyton rubrum. Genetics, 208, 1657- 1669. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.117.300573</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94848-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drira, I., Neji, S., Hadrich, I., Trabelsi, H., Sellami, H., Cheikhrouhou, F., et al. (2014) Polymorphisms in the ITS rDNA Regions for Differentiating Strains of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes Complex in Sfax-Tunisia. Mycoses, 57, 453-459.https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12181</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>