<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ABB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8456</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abb.2019.108019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ABB-94724</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Evaluation of Fluorescent Stains for Viability Assessment of the Potato Cyst Nematodes &lt;i&gt;Globodera pallida&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;G. ellingtonae&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Syamkumar</surname><given-names>Sivasankara Pillai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Louise-Marie</surname><given-names>Dandurand</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>08</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>258</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Potato cyst nematodes (PCNs), 
  Globodera pallida
   and 
  Globodera
   
  rostochiensis
  , are quarantine pests of potato which cause significant damage to production and farm gate revenue worldwide.
   
  Accurately assessing viability of PCN eggs is important for eradication and management programs. The goal of this study was to develop a quick and reliable fluorescent staining method to evaluate viability of G. pallida and Globodera
   
  ellingtonae
   eggs. The staining efficiency of eight fluorescent stains w
  as
   evaluated using G. pallida eggs
   
  compared
   with the conventional Meldola’s Blue (MB) staining method. The staining efficiency of the fluorescent stains ranged from 80.33 &#177; 2.99 (Sytox Green) to 100% (Acridine Orange) for non-viable eggs. Two stains were further evaluated for their efficiency in assessing viability of encysted eggs from five different greenhouse-reared G. pallida cyst sources
   
  which contained both viable and non-viable eggs. For the G. pallida cyst sources, viability ofencysted eggs w
  ere
   estimated to be 41.02 &#177; 3.81
   
  to 62.66
  %
   &#177; 3.12% when stained with Acridine Orange (AO) and 79.52
  %
   &#177; 1.54% viability for G. ellingtonae.
   
  Both staining time and stain concentration were significant for staining efficiency of released and encysted eggs. Staining time and concentration were optimized for released eggs at 4 h at 10 μg/ml and for encysted eggs 
  at
   16 h at 25 μg/ml respectively for AO. Fluorescent stains accurately and rapidly assessed percent egg viability and were determined to be as sensitive as a seven-day incubation with the Meldola’s Blue staining method.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Globodera pallida</kwd><kwd> Globodera ellingtonae&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Nematode Viability Assessment</kwd><kwd> Fluorescent Stains</kwd><kwd> Meldola Blue</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Biotrophic cyst nematodes are amongst the most economically damaging pests to cropping systems worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref1">1</xref>]. The potato cyst nematodes (PCNs) Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens and Globodera rostochiensis (Wollenweber) Behrens have been estimated to cause 9% potato yield loss in the UK [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref3">3</xref>]. Both G. pallida and G. rostochiensis originated in South America and spreaded to nearly all major potato growing regions of the world. Because of the ease of spread, and economic importance, potato cyst nematodes are listed as quarantine pests and subjected to strict regulation in many countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>In the United States, G. pallida was discovered in Idaho in 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref6">6</xref>] and is a regulated pest by the United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services (USDA-APHIS) and by the Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref8">8</xref>]. A current map of the infestation in Idaho is available through the USDA-APHIS website: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/nematode/pcn). Phytosanitary regulations restrict potato cultivation or any other host crop in an infested field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref7">7</xref>]. It takes only two cysts from two different soil samples with one of the cysts containing viable PCN eggs for the ﬁeld to be considered infested. Infested ﬁelds are eligible to have some restrictions lifted when no viable eggs are no longer detected by the Meldola’s Blue viability staining method and potato bioassays detect no reproduction of PCN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref7">7</xref>]. One challenge for G. pallida control is the ability of encysted eggs to remain viable in soil for long periods (over 20 years) of time, and their capacity to infect potato after a long quiescent stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref11">11</xref>] thus making control by crop rotation difficult.</p><p>Quantifying viability of G. pallida eggs is important for both effective management, as well as eradication programs. Unfortunately, no efficient methods except time consuming and labor-intensive staining and microscopic evaluation of nematodes are available for this purpose. The conventional method of viability assessment of PCN is performed by using vital stains, such as Meldola’s Blue and Nile Blue A [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref14">14</xref>]. The Meldola’s Blue method is recommended by the Canada and United States guidelines on surveillance and phytosanitary actions for the G. pallida and G. rosctochiensis and also by the European Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) for routine assays of population densities from soil samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref7">7</xref>]. But this method requires 7 days for adequately staining the eggs. Besides the use of vital stains, in vitro egg hatching assays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref15">15</xref>] are also used for assessing egg viability, but this method does not account for unhatched eggs that may be viable but in diapause [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref16">16</xref>].</p><p>Fluorescent dyes are seldom used for assessing nematode egg viability, but they are extensively used for precisely diagnosing cell viability and cell deaths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref20">20</xref>]. Both cell permeant and non-permeant fluorescent dyes are available for assessing cell viability and differential staining of live and dead cells. The cell permeant dyes can freely diffuse through the membranes of live cells and the non-permeant fluorescent dyes can only diffuse through compromised cell membranes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref21">21</xref>]. The fluorescent dyes offer higher photo stability and brightness compared to non-fluorescent stains and do not require prolonged incubation time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref22">22</xref>]. For nematodes, the success of staining methods depends on the stain permeability through its cuticle and lipoprotein membrane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref23">23</xref>]. The permeability is compromised by age, environmental factors such as temperature, chemical nematicides, nematode pathogens etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref24">24</xref>]. In an earlier attempt, Perry and Feil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref25">25</xref>] used the fluorescent dye, acridine orange (AO) to determine the viability of G. rostochiensis, and Twomey et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref26">26</xref>] used AO as an indicator of egg permeability in G. rostochiensis caused by contact with potato root diffusate. Similarly, AO has been used for distinguishing live and dead eggs of Heterodera glycines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref27">27</xref>] and to study the relationship between juvenile hatching and fluorescence of H. glycines eggs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref28">28</xref>]. More recently Hajihassani and Dandurand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref29">29</xref>] assessed the fluorescent dyes Sytox Green and Sytox Live/Dead green kit staining for viability staining of G. pallida for large particle flow cytometry.</p><p>In the present study, cell impermeant fluorescent stains were assessed for PCN egg viability. The goal of this study was to develop a fast and reliable fluorescent staining method for the evaluation of PCN egg viability. The effectiveness of the fluorescent stains was compared with the classic Meldola’s Blue staining method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Potato Cyst Nematode Cysts</title><p>Two Globodera species, G. pallida and G. ellingtonae were used for the study. Five different greenhouse reared cyst sources (A-E) from Idaho population of G. pallida reared on two different susceptible potato cultivars Desir&#233;e or Russet Burbank were used. Cysts were extracted from the soil by using an elutriator 16 weeks after infestation and planting and the harvested cysts were stored at 4˚C until experimental use [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref31">31</xref>]. Morphological and molecular species confirmation of the G. pallida cyst was conducted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref32">32</xref>]. Globodera ellingtonae cysts were provided by Dr. Inga Zasada (USDA-ARS, Corvallis, Oregon).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Fluorescent Stains and Microscopy</title><p>Eight cell impermeant fluorescent stains, Acridine Orange (AO), Laser Dye Styryl 751 (LDS 751), SYTO Orange 81, SYTO Orange 82, SYTO Orange 83, SYTO Orange 84, SYTO Orange 85 and Sytox Green were used to assess the PCN egg viability. All fluorescent stains were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eugene, Oregon, USA. The vital stain Meldola’s Blue (8-dimethylamino-2,3-benzophenoxazine hemi (zinc chloride) salt) used for the evaluation of fluorescent staining method was procured from Spectrum Chemical, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.</p><p>Examination of stained eggs was conducted using a Leica DMi8 fluorescent microscope (Leica microsystems CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a metal halide light (Lumen 200 Fluorescence Illumination Systems, Prior Scientific Inc., Rockland, MA, USA) source. A manual filter turret with filter cubes, 4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI) (Ex:390/70-DC:455-EM:470), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Ex:470/40-DC:495-EM:525/50), Rhodamine (Ex:546/10-DC:560-EM:585/40) and Y5 (Ex:620/60-DC:660-EM:700/76) were used for visualizing different stains with varying fluorescent emission optima. Meldola’s Blue stained eggs were analyzed under bright field. Fluorescence data for each stain were calculated and the fluorescent microscope is calibrated with focal check fluorescence microscope test slide #3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Photographs were taken in a darkened room at either 5&#215;, 10&#215; or 20&#215; magniﬁcation with a Leica DFC 450 digital camera and processed with Leica Application Suite (LAS) software.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Optimization of Stains for PCN Egg and Cyst Staining</title><p>To optimize the staining protocol 20 surface sterilized and presoaked (24 h in water) G. pallida cysts were used for each stain. The cysts were transferred to a 2 ml eppendorf tube with 50 &#181;l Barnstead GenPure water (Barnstead GenPure UV-TOC xCAD plus, Thermo electron LRD GmbH, Stockland 3, Germany), crushed using a Tenbroeck all glass tissue homogenizer (Fisher Scientific, USA). The egg suspension was allowed to settle for 5 minutes at room temperature and then centrifuged at 4800 g for 3 minutes at 4˚C using a refrigerated tabletop centrifuge (Eppendorf centrifuge 5810R, Eppendorf AG, 22331, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was removed and eggs resuspended in 1.5 ml GenPure water. Four different concentrations of stains, 5, 10, 25 and 50 &#181;g/ml, for AO and LDS 751; and 5, 10, 25 and 50 &#181;M/ml concentration of SYTO Orange 81 - 85 and Sytox Green stains were used. All stain dilutions were made using sterile GenPure water. For the optimization of stains, G. pallida eggs were heat killed using a modified method of Christoforo et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref33">33</xref>]. The freed eggs were heat treated for 2 h at 70˚C using a heating block and subsequently cooled on an ice before staining. For each concentration, 100 &#181;l egg suspensions with an equal volume of staining solution were pipetted into 1.5 ml eppendorf tube and incubated in the dark at room temperature. Evaluation of staining efficiency was conducted at 1, 2, 4 and 8 h incubation times. To remove the residual stain, 50 &#181;l of the egg suspension was centrifuged at 4800 g for 3 minutes and washed with 100 &#181;l of GenPure water. The pelleted eggs were re-suspended in 10 &#181;l of GenPure water and dispensed to a glass slidefor microscopic examination. An average of 65 eggs was counted for each replicate with three replicates per treatment, and the experiment was repeated. Fluorescent egg percentage was calculated by using the formula: % fluorescent eggs = (stained eggs/(stained + non-stained eggs)) &#215; 100.</p><p>Two stains, AO and LDS 751 from the above experiment were further evaluated for application in staining eggs from whole G. pallida and G. ellingtonae cysts. Whole heat killed (cysts were incubated in boiling water for 7 minutes and cooled on an ice bath) cysts from source A were incubated in dark at room temperature for 4, 8, 16 and 24 h in 10, 25 and 50 &#181;g/ml concentration of AO and 25, 50 and 100 &#181;g/ml final concentration of LDS 751. Thirty-six cysts for each treatment were stained and eggs from nine cysts were evaluated for each time interval at each concentration. The cysts were crushed, washed to remove excess stain and released eggs were re-suspended in 50 &#181;l of GenPure water. Three-10 &#181;l aliquots containing about 140 eggs per aliquot for each treatment were dispensed into a glass slide, visualized and scored under the microscope. The experiment was repeated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. PCN Viability Assessment Using Fluorescent Stains</title><p>Five different G. pallida and one G. ellingtonae cyst source was tested using AO and LDS 751 for viability assessment using the optimized staining parameters. Eggs that remained encysted from cyst sources were fluorescently stained and compared with Meldola’s Blue staining assay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref13">13</xref>]. Surface sterilized, presoaked cysts from each source were replicated 5 times for each treatment, and the experiment was repeated. After staining, cysts from each replicate were crushed, washed to remove excess stain, re-suspended in 50 ul of GenPure water, and a 10 &#181;l aliquot containing an average of 158 eggs were dispensed and counted. Heat killed cysts from each cyst source were used as the positive control. Viability by Meldola’s Blue stain was assessed after 7-day incubation time. Percent egg viability was calculated using the formula: % viability of eggs = (Non-stained Eggs/(Stained eggs + Non-stained eggs)) &#215; 100.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>To evaluate the staining efficiency of the vital fluorescent stains a randomized complete design (RCD) of 9 stains, 4 different optimization times at 4 different concentrations of the stains were analyzed with the generalized linear mixed model (Proc GLIMMIX) procedure of SAS statistical package [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref34">34</xref>] assuming a binomial distribution for the number of stained eggs and a logit link function. The different stains, stain concentrations and staining times were treated as fixed effects and the significance of main (percent staining) and interaction effect (interaction of stain, concentration, stain* concentration) over time were tested. The level of significance was set for p ≤ 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Staining Efficiency of Heat Killed Eggs</title><p>All fluorescent stains tested indicated a non-viable egg population of 80% or more, whereas Meldola’s Blue indicated an average 51.5% non-viable population. Non-viable eggs intensely fluoresced green when stained with Sytox green or AO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); red when stained with LDS 751; or orange when stained with the SYTO Orange series. Empty eggs were easily distinguished from intact eggs as the eggshell membrane of an empty egg was stained leaving a hollow transparent eggshell which was easily distinguished under the microscope (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In our study, non-viable eggs were clearly distinguished from live as the dead eggs</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Acridine orange stained G. pallida eggs. The dead eggs are characterized by the deeply stained green fluorescent color whereas the live eggs with no intense fluorescence. The live eggs and empty eggs shells were distinguished by the granularity (absence of internal structures for the empty eggshell). Scale bar = 50 μM.</p><p>consistently gave a maximum fluorescent detection value of 255 whereas the live eggs have a mean value &lt; 80 using LAS software.</p><p>All fluorescent stains required 4 h of staining and no increase in efficiency after 8 h of incubation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). Among the various stains tested, AO was the most efficient stain, as 87.61% &#177; 1.12% non-viable eggs were stained after 4 h at the lowest concentration tested (5 &#181;g/ml); and 100% of the non-viable eggs were stained after 4 h at 25 &#181;g/ml concentration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). When AO was used at higher concentrations (25 &amp; 50 &#181;g/ml), additional washing was required to remove high fluorescence from the background. An average of 98. 45% &#177; 0.86% of non-viable eggs were stained by LDS 751 (25 &#181;g/ml) in 4 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). SYTO Orange series 81 through 85, and Sytox Green stains (50 &#181;M/ml) were less efficient as only 83% - 93% of the non-viable, heat-killed eggs were stained after incubation for 4 h (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). Increased concentration of SYTO stains and incubation time did not increase staining efficiency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the fluorescence of G. pallida eggs and juveniles stained with the fluorescent dyes AO, LDS 751 and SYTO Orange 85 with the control Meldola’s Blue stain. The interaction between staining time, concentration and stain*concentration *time was significant (p ≤ 0.0001). The interaction of concentration of stains and staining time on percent staining of released non-viable G. pallida egg is provided as supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S2.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Staining Efficiency of Heat Killed Cysts</title><p>Efficiency of two stains, AO and LDS 751 was further evaluated to estimate the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Percent staining efficiency of eight fluorescent stains and Meldola’s Blue on G. pallida eggs*</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stain</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Conc.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Staining percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Acridine Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.98 &#177; 2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.20 &#177; 1.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.61 &#177; 1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.93 &#177; 1.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.82 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.24 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.45 &#177; 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.56 &#177; 0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.84 &#177; 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.79 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.73 &#177; 0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.05 &#177; 0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >LDS 751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.30 &#177; 2.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.19 &#177; 2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.47 &#177; 3.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.01 &#177; 2.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.62 &#177; 3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.85 &#177; 1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.94 &#177; 2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.63 &#177; 1.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.45 &#177; 2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.29 &#177; 0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.93 &#177; 0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.84 &#177; 0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.56 &#177; 2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.45 &#177; 1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.45 &#177; 0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.10 &#177; 1.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTO Orange 81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.94 &#177; 2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.03 &#177; 2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.63 &#177; 4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.06 &#177; 2.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.35 &#177; 1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.90 &#177; 2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.09 &#177; 3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.62 &#177; 1.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.23 &#177; 2.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.69 &#177; 1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.15 &#177; 1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.72 &#177; 1.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.80 &#177; 2.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.26 &#177; 2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.83 &#177; 1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.90 &#177; 1.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTO Orange 82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.28 &#177; 2.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.26 &#177; 2.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.76 &#177; 1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.38 &#177; 2.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.20 &#177; 2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.65 &#177; 1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.16 &#177; 4.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.68 &#177; 1.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.02 &#177; 1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.67 &#177; 1.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.42 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.73 &#177; 1.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.22 &#177; 1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.24 &#177; 1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.92 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.77 &#177; 1.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTO Orange 83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.24 &#177; 2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.64 &#177; 2.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.91 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.41 &#177; 1.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.08 &#177; 1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.85 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.16 &#177; 1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.79 &#177; 1.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.41 &#177; 1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.99 &#177; 0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.34 &#177; 1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.95 &#177; 0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.85 &#177; 3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.33 &#177; 2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.43 &#177; 2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.89 &#177; 1.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTO Orange 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.76 &#177; 2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.60 &#177; 2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.57 &#177; 2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.57 &#177; 2.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.69 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.73 &#177; 1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.47 &#177; 3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.75 &#177; 1.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.00 &#177; 3.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.69 &#177; 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.76 &#177; 1.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.85 &#177; 1.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.08 &#177; 3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.28 &#177; 1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.93 &#177; 1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.92 &#177; 2.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTO Orange 85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.89 &#177; 2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.38 &#177; 3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.43 &#177; 2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.86 &#177; 0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.66 &#177; 1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.22 &#177; 1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.17 &#177; 1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.15 &#177; 0.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.36 &#177; 1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.29 &#177; 2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.09 &#177; 2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.20 &#177; 1.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.28 &#177; 1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.18 &#177; 0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.28 &#177; 1.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.14 &#177; 1.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >SYTOX Green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.41 &#177; 1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.17 &#177; 2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.65 &#177; 0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.62 &#177; 2.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.67 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.99 &#177; 3.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.33 &#177; 3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.83 &#177; 3.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.48 &#177; 1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.40 &#177; 1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33 &#177; 1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.80 &#177; 1.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;M</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.43 &#177; 2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.37 &#177; 1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.23 &#177; 1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.33 &#177; 2.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meldola’s Blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05% w/v</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.04 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.88 &#177; 1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.08 &#177; 1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.62 &#177; 1.43</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values are means of two independent experiments with three replicates each followed by standard errors.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</label><caption><title> Staining efficiency of AO and LDS 751 on G. pallida cysts*</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Stain</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Conc.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Staining percent</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 h</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Acridine Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.06 &#177; 1.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.18 &#177; 0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.71 &#177; 1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.88 &#177; 1.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.90 &#177; 0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.01 &#177; 1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.03 &#177; 0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.63 &#177; 0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00 &#177; 00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >LDS 751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.22 &#177; 2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.40 &#177; 1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.17 &#177; 2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.95 &#177; 2.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.70 &#177; 1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.60 &#177; 1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.94 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.11 &#177; 0.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.28 &#177; 1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.30 &#177; 0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.58 &#177; 0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.15 &#177; 0.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meldola’s Blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05% w/v</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.96 &#177; 1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.06 &#177; 2.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.04 &#177; 2.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.99 &#177; 1.95</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values are means of two independent experiments with three replicates each followed by standard errors.</p><p>percentage of non-viable, heat killed G. pallida encysted eggs. No difference was found in the efficiency of these two stains whether eggs were released or remained encysted prior to staining. However, a significantly greater percentage of eggs were stained when AO was used compared to LDS 751 or Meldola’s Blue. Unlike free eggs, whole cysts required higher concentrations of both AO and LDS 751 (25 &#181;g/ml, and 50 &#181;g/ml respectively). Only 93.7% of the non-viable, heat killed eggs were stained at 10 &#181;g/ml concentration in 16 h but increased to 100% when a 25 &#181;g/ml AO concentration was used. The percent non-viable eggs stained with LDS 751 was 86.1% when using a concentration of 25 &#181;g/ml while increasing the concentration to 50 &#181;g/ml resulted in a 95.9% staining efficiency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2). A significant interaction between staining time, concentration and stain*concentration *time was found (p ≤ 0.0001) (supplementary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S3 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S4).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</label><caption><title> Comparison of percent viability of 5 G. pallida cyst sources and the G. ellingtonae assayed using AO, LDS 751 and MB staining methods</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conc.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GP Source A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GP Source B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GP Source C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GP Source D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GP Source E</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GE</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acridine Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.02 &#177; 3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.36 &#177; 3.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.46 &#177; 3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.85 &#177; 5.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.66 &#177; 3.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.52 &#177; 1.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDS 751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.34 &#177; 1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.20 &#177; 1.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.53 &#177; 4.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.89 &#177; 3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.20 &#177; 3.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.25 &#177; 1.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meldola’s Blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05% w/v</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.21 &#177; 6.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.00 &#177; 1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.58 &#177; 4.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.95 &#177; 5.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.55 &#177; 4.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.10 &#177; 1.10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Values are means of two independent experiments with three replicates each followed by standard errors. GP—G. pallida, GE—G. ellingtonae.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</label><caption><title> Interaction of different G. pallida cyst sources and stains on assessing viability</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Viability assessment method</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stain Conc.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percent viability</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acridine Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.47 &#177; 1.43 a*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDS 751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.63&#177; 1.43 a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Meldola’s Blue</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05% w/v</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.66 &#177; 1.43 b</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*The data is based on 5 different G. pallida cyst sources and means with different letters are significantly different as determined by Tukey’s HSD comparison testat p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Comparison of Fluorescent Stains vs Meldola’s Blue for Assessing PCN Egg Viability</title><p>Viability assays using either AO or LDS 751 were compared to the Meldola’s Blue protocol. Egg viability of the five greenhouse reared G. pallida cysts sources ranged from 41.0% &#177; 3.8% (Source A) through 62.3% &#177; 3.1% (Source E) when stained with AO; 47.3% &#177; 1.3% through 65.2% &#177; 3.4% when stains with LDS 751; and 39.2% &#177; 6.2% to 52.6% &#177; 4.0% with Meldola’s Blue staining (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3). The interaction between cyst sources and stain was not significant (p ≥ 0.15) which indicates that the cyst sources responded similarly to each viability assessment method. However, the type of stain used had a significant effect on the percent viability assessment (p ≤ 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Accurate determination of PCN egg viability is important in estimating the potential crop loss due to a nematode infestation and for appropriate regulatory and/or management actions. Even though several staining methods are in use for the detection of PCN egg viability, use of a vital stain and its visual observation is considered to be the most accurate, reliable and widely accepted method for viability assessment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref33">33</xref>]. The current vital stain used for viability assessment of PCN, Meldola’s Blue, has an incubation of 7 days for adequate staining of eggs. This is time consuming and can skew in favor of a non-viable population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref35">35</xref>]. This method is also unsuccessful for staining aged specimens, typically producing yellow-colored specimens, and in some cases, specimens may be partially stained in either the head area or at the tail end [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref12">12</xref>]. The eight fluorescent stains examined in this study indicate that the use of fluorescent stains is reliable for PCN egg viability assessment.</p><p>Acridine Orange is a powerful stain to measure cells undergoing apoptosis and useful in fixed tissues and cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref36">36</xref>]. Twomey et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref26">26</xref>] used the fluorescent stain AO as an indicator of egg permeability triggered by potato root diffusate in a closely related PCN species G. rostochiensis. In the present study, almost 100% of the heat killed G. pallida and G. ellingtonae eggs were stained by AO which is in agreement with Twomey et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref26">26</xref>]. Staining with AO accurately estimated non-viable eggs for both G. pallida and G. ellingtonae. Meyer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref24">24</xref>] reported that AO is useful for distinguishing between viable and non-viable Heterodera glycines eggs. LDS 751 stained over 98% of the heat killed eggs within 4 h. LDS 751 undergoes fluorescence enhancement upon binding to nucleic acids but with negligible fluorescent enhancement upon binding to proteins used to discriminate intact and damaged cells. The non-viable eggs with compromised membrane allowed the dye to effectively stain the eggs a deep read color with minimal egg membrane staining. In addition, LDS 751 is used for the differentiation of apoptotic from non-apoptotic cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref37">37</xref>]. This property of the LDS 751 stain can be further exploited for staining an aging population of viable G. pallida eggs. Since both AO and LDS 751 are fixable nucleic acid stains, these stains will be more stable with little or no photo bleaching over time.</p><p>The SYTO family of fluorescent stains exhibits 450 to 1000 fold fluorescence enhancement upon binding nucleic acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref22">22</xref>] and are extensively used to determine viability/apoptosis of various cell lines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref37">37</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref39">39</xref>]. The comparatively high staining efficiency of the SYTO stains can be exploited for viability assessment of PCN under laboratory conditions. The low cytotoxic effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref39">39</xref>] of the SYTO stains may be an advantage for using in downstream processing, such as hatching assays. However, one disadvantages of the SYTO stains is their sensitivity to storage conditions compared to the other fluorescent stains. In a previous study, Hajihassani and Dandurand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref29">29</xref>] used Sytox Green stain for fluorescent staining and sorting of G. pallida using flow cytometer observed an increased viability of eggs upon increasing the incubation time. The study also reported a 7% - 14.6% greater viability estimate of G. pallida eggs than Meldola’s Blue staining. A loss of fluorescence for the SYTO stains subsequent to the initiation of apoptotic cascade is well documented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref41">41</xref>]. Self-quenching of SYTO molecules during cell death can result in loss of fluorescence and an overestimation of the viability. Apoptotic chromatic condensation, decrease in the number of SYTO binding sites as the chromatin condensation and/or RNA degradation during apoptosis, alterations in binding of SYTO to mitochondrial DNA and decrease in mitochondrial uptake of SYTO molecules, the loss of plasma membrane integrity during the celldeath can all be possible reasons for the fluorescence loss by SYTO stains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref38">38</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94724-ref44">44</xref>].</p><p>Results from this study clearly demonstrate that fluorescent stains can reliably assess viability of both G. pallida and G. ellingtonae. The fluorescent stains assessed required minimal staining time compared to the Meldola’s Blue staining. Use of fluorescent stains can be further developed for fluorescence-based high throughput sorting of PCN life stages such as assessing viability of field derived encysted eggs through use of automated cell imaging systems and/or large particle flow cytometers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge Dr. Inga Zasada (USDA-ARS, Corvallis) for providing G. ellingtonae cysts, William Price, Director of Statistical Programs, University of Idaho for his statistical data analysis advice, and members of PCN Laboratory Amanda Gray &amp; Emily Forsberg at the University of Idaho for their help.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pillai, S.S. and Dandurand, L.-M. (2019) Evaluation of Fluorescent Stains for Viability Assessment of the Potato Cyst Nematodes Globodera pallida and G. ellingtonae. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 10, 244-258. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2019.108019</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Supplementary</title><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> Effect of concentration of stains on percent staining of released non-viable G. pallida eggs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.32 &#177; 1.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.63 &#177; 0.46<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.31 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.25 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDS751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.83 &#177; 1.55<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.38 &#177; 1.42<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.93 &#177; 0.92<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.49 &#177; 0.80<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SYTO81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.82 &#177; 1.25<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.62 &#177; 1.85<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.48 &#177; 1.33<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.45 &#177; 1.22<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SYTO82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.67 &#177; 1.20<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.57 &#177; 1.86<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.25 &#177; 1.35<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.15 &#177; 1.20<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SYTO83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.98 &#177; 1.50<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.13 &#177; 1.58<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.87 &#177; 1.11<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.35 &#177; 0.98<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SYTO84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.86 &#177; 1.37<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.22 &#177; 1.82<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.72 &#177; 1.25<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.36 &#177; 1.11<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SYTO85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.78 &#177; 1.54<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.43 &#177; 1.34<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.08 &#177; 0.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.08 &#177; 0.86<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sytoxgreen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.95 &#177; 1.50<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.64 &#177; 1.72<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.90 &#177; 1.12<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.35 &#177; 1.13<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.87 &#177; 1.14<sup>f</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T grouping for stain least squares means (Alpha = 0.05). A single standard concentration (0.05% w/v) of the MB stain is used for the study. LS-means with the same letter are not significantly different.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S2</label><caption><title> Effect of staining time on percent staining of released non-viable G. pallida eggs across the different concentrations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.50 &#177; 1.15<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.51 &#177; 1.37<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.24 &#177; 1.06<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.66 &#177; 0.97<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.61 &#177; 1.17<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.15 &#177; 1.29<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.14 &#177; 0.86<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.69 &#177; 0.88<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.91 &#177; 1.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.93 &#177; 1.29<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.95 &#177; 0.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.36 &#177; 0.71<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.86 &#177; 1.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.86 &#177; 1.31<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.69 &#177; 0.79<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.69 &#177; 0.73<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T grouping for time least squares means (Alpha = 0.05). LS-means with the same letter are not significantly different.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S3</label><caption><title> Effect of concentration of stains on percent staining of encysted non-viable G. pallida eggs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.11 &#177; 0.71<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.86 &#177; 0.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.66 &#177; 0.23<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDS751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.35 &#177; 1.08<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.43 &#177; 0.63<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.08 &#177; 0.56<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.81 &#177; 1.20<sup>c</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T grouping for stain least squares means (Alpha = 0.05). LS-means with the same letter are not significantly different. A single standard concentration (0.05% w/v) of the MB stain is used for the study.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S4</label><caption><title> Effect of staining time on percent staining of encysted non-viable G. pallida eggs across the different concentrations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#181;g/ml</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#181;g/ml</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.48 &#177; 1.67<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.21 &#177; 1.15<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.92 &#177; 0.90<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.74 &#177; 1.39<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.93 &#177; 0.76<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.74 &#177; 0.60<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.10 &#177; 1.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.30 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.38 &#177; 0.37<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.76 &#177; 0.99<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.05 &#177; 0.43<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.06 &#177; 0.43<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T grouping for time least squares means (Alpha = 0.05). LS-means with the same letter are not significantly different.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94724-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nicol, J.M., Turner, S.J., Coyne, D.L., Nijs, L., Hockland, S. and Maafi, Z.T. (2011) Current Nematode Threats to World Agriculture. In: Jones, J., Gheysen, G. and Fenoll, C., Eds., Genomics and Molecular Genetics of Plant-Nematode Interactions, Springer, Dordrecht, 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0434-3_2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Turner, S.J. and Evans, K. (1998) The Origins, Global Distribution and Biology of Potato Cyst Nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis (Woll.) and Globodera pallida (Stone). In: Marks, R.J. and Brodie, B.B., Eds., Potato Cyst Nematodes: Biology, Distribution and Control, CABI, Wallingford, 7-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Turner, S.J. and Rowe, J.A. (2006) Cyst Nematodes. In: Perry, R.N. and Moens, M., Eds., Plant Nematology, CABI, Wallingford, 91-122.  
https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845930561.0091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Seehofer</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Council Directive 2007/33/EC of 11 June 2007 on the Control of Potato Cyst Nematodes and Repealing Directive 69/465/EEC</article-title><source> Official Journal of the European Union</source><volume> 156</volume>,<fpage> 12</fpage>-<lpage>22</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hockland, S., Niere, B., Grenier, E., Blok, V.C., Phillips, M.S., DenNijs, L., Anthoine, G., Pickup, J. and Viaene, N. (2012) An Evaluation of the Implications of Virulence in Non-European Populations of Globodera pallida and G. rostochiensis for Potato Cultivation in Europe. Nematology, 14, 1-13. 
https://doi.org/10.1163/138855411X587112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hafez, S.L., Sundararaj, P., Handoo, Z.A., Skantar, A.M., Carta, L.K. and Chitwood, D.J. (2007) First Report of the Pale Cyst Nematode, Globodera pallida, in the United States. Plant Disease, 91, 325. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-91-3-0325B</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2014) Canada and United States: Guidelines on Surveillance and Phytosanitary Actions for the Potato Cyst Nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida.  
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/nematode/downloads/potato_guidelines.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kooliyottil, R., Dandurand, L.M., Govindan, B.N. and Knudsen, G.R. (2016) Microscopy Method to Compare Cyst Nematode Infection of Different Plant Species. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 7, 311-318. 
https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2016.76029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grainger, J. (1964) Factors Affecting the Control of Eelworm Diseases. Nematologica, 10, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1163/187529264X00574</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jones</surname><given-names> F.G.W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1970</year>)<article-title>The Control of the Potato Cyst-Nematode</article-title><source> Journal of the Royal Society of Arts</source><volume> 118</volume>,<fpage> 179</fpage>-<lpage>199</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turner, S.J. (1996) Population Decline of Potato Cyst Nematodes (Globodera rostochiensis, G. pallida) in Field Soils in Northern Ireland. Annals of Applied Biology, 129, 315-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1996.tb05754.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogiga, I.R. and Estey, R.H. (1974) The Use of Meldola Blue and Nile Blue a, for Distinguishing Dead from Living Nematodes. Nematologica, 20, 271-276. 
https://doi.org/10.1163/187529274X00302</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shepherd, A.M. (1962) New Blue R, a Stain that Differentiates between Living and Dead Nematodes. Nematologica, 8, 201-208.  
https://doi.org/10.1163/187529262X00431</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Shepherd, A.M. (1986) Extraction and Estimation of Cyst Nematodes. In: Southey, J.F., Ed., Laboratory Methods for Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes, HMSO Books, Norwich, 31-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devine, K.J., Byrne, J. and Jones, P.W. (2001) In Vitro Studies on the Relative Availability and Mobility in Soil of Natural Hatching Factors for the Potato Cyst nematodes, Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida. Nematology, 3, 75-83. 
https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101300106919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devine, K.J. and Jones, P.W. (2001) Effects of Hatching Factors on Potato Cyst Nematode Hatch and In-Egg Mortality in Soil and in Vitro. Nematology, 3, 65-74. 
https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101300106900</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens, N.H. and Reutelingsperger, C.A. (1995) Novel Assay for Apoptosis: Flow Cytometric Detection of Phosphatidylserine Expression on Early Apoptotic Cells Using Fluorescein Labelled Annexin V. Journal of Immunological Methods, 184, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(95)00072-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foglieni, C., Meoni, C. and Davalli, A.M. (2001) Fluorescent Dyes for Cell Viability: An Application on Prefixed Conditions. Histochemical Cell Biology, 115, 223-229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engin, U., Ceyda, A., Ferda, A., Elif, I. and Yusuf, Y. (2011) A Glance at the Methods for Detection of Apoptosis Qualitatively and Quantitatively. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 36, 261-269.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Gurtu, V., Kain, S.R. and Yan, G. (1997) Early Detection of Apoptosis Using a Fluorescent Conjugate of Annexin V. Biotechniques, 23, 525-531. 
https://doi.org/10.2144/97233pf01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lulevich, V., Shih, Y.P., Lo, S.H. and Liu, G.Y. (2009) Cell Tracing Dyes Significantly Change Single Cell Mechanics. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 113, 6511-6519.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8103358</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, I. and Spence, M. (2010) The Molecular Probes Handbook. A Guide to Fluorescent Probes and Labeling Technologies. 11th Edition, Life Technologies, 1060 p, Carlsbad, CA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perry, R.N., Wharton, D.A. and Clarke, A.J. (1982) The Structure of the Eggshell of Globodera rostochiensis (Nematoda: Tylenchida). International Journal for Parasitology, 12, 481-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(82)90080-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, S.L.F., Sayre, R.M. and Huettel, R.N. (1988) Comparisons of Selected Stains for Distinguishing between Live and Dead Eggs of the Plant Parasitic Nematode Heterodera glycines. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 55, 132-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perry, R.N. and Feil, R.J. (1986) Observations on a Novel Hatching Bioassay for Globodera rostochiensis Using Fluorescence Microscopy. Revue de Nematology, 9, 280-282.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Twomey, U., Warrior, P., Kerry, B.R. and Perry, R.N. (2000) Effects of the Biological Nematicide DiTerra, on Hatching of Globodera rostochiensis and G. pallida. Nematology, 2, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854100509114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donald, P.A. and Niblack, T.L. (1994) Distinguishing between Viable and Nonviable Heterodera Glycines Eggs. Journal of Nematology, 26, 596-598</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charlson, D.V., Harkins, K.R. and Tylka, G.L. (2008) Relationship between Juvenile Hatching and Acridine Orange Fluorescence of Heterodera Glycines Eggs. Nematology, 10, 603-610. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854108785787181</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hajihassani, A. and Dandurand, L.M. (2018) An Improved Technique for Sorting Developmental Stages and Assessing Egg Viability of Globodera pallida Using High-Throughput Complex Object Parametric Analyzer and Sorter. Plant Disease, 102, 2001-2008. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-17-1428-RE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hominick, W.M., Forrest, J.M.S. and Evans, A.A.F. (1985) Diapause in GloboderaRostochiensis and Variability in Hatching Trials. Nematologica, 31, 159-170. 
https://doi.org/10.1163/187529285X00210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dandurand, L.M. and Knudsen, G.R. (2016) Effect of the Trap Crop Solanum sisymbriifolium and Two Biocontrol Fungi on Reproduction of the Potato Cyst Nematode, Globodera pallida. Annals of Applied Biology, 169, 180-189. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Skantar, A.M., Handoo, Z.A., Carta, L.K. and Chitwood, D.J. (2007) Morphological and Molecular Identification of Globodera pallida Associated with Potato in Idaho. Journal of Nematology, 39, 133-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christoforou, M., Pantelides, I.S., Kanetis, L., Ioannou, N. and Tsaltas, D. (2014) Rapid Detection and Quantification of Viable Potato Cyst Nematodes Using qPCR in Combination with Propidium Monoazide. Plant Pathology, 63, 1185-1192. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12193</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS Institute (2011) The SAS System for Windows. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kroese, D., Zasada, I.A. and Ingham, R.E. (2011) Comparison of Meldola’s Blue Staining and Hatching Assay with Potato Root Diffusate for Assessment of Globodera sp. Egg Viability. Journal of Nematology, 43, 182-186.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plemel, J.R., Caprariello, A.V., Keough, M.B., Henry, T.J., Tsutsui, S., Chu, T.H., Schenk, G.J., Klaver, R., Yong, V.W. and Stys, P.K. (2017) Unique Spectral Signatures of the Nucleic Acid Dye Acridine Orange Can Distinguish Cell Death by Apoptosis and Necroptosis. The Journal of Cell Biology, 216, 1163-1181. 
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201602028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frey, T. (1995) Nucleic Acid Dyes for Detection of Apoptosis in Live Cells. Cytometry, 21, 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990210307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poot, M., Gibson, L.L. and Singer, V.L. (1997) Detection of Apoptosis in Live Cells by MitoTrackerTM Red CMXRos and SYTO Dye Flow Cytometry. Cytometry, 27, 358-364. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19970401)27:4&lt;358::AID-CYTO7&gt;3.0.CO;2-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wlodkowic, D., Skommer, J. and Pelkonen, J. (2007) Towards an Understanding of Apoptosis Detection by SYTO Dyes. Cytometry Part A, 71A, 61-72. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20366</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wlodkowic, D. and Skommer, J. (2007) SYTO Probes: Markers of Apoptotic Cell Demise. Current Protocols in Cytometry, 42, 7.33.1-7.33.12. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0733s42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eray, M., Matto, M., Kaartinen, M., Andersson, L. and Pelkonen, J. (2001) Flow Cytometric Analysis of Apoptotic Subpopulations with a Combination of Annexin V-FITC, Propidium Iodide and SYTO 17. Cytometry, 43, 134-142. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0320(20010201)43:2&lt;134::AID-CYTO1028&gt;3.0.CO;2-L</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Zandvoort, M.A., de Grauw, C.J., Gerritsen, H.C., Broers, J.L., oudeEgbrink, M.G., Ramaekers, F.C. and Slaaf, D.W. (2002) Discrimination of DNA and RNA in Cells by a Vital Fluorescent Probe: Lifetime Imaging of SYTO13 in Healthy and Apoptotic Cells. Cytometry, 47, 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10076</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broxterman, H.J., Schuurhuis, G.J., Lankelma, J., Oberink, J.W., Eekman, C.A., Claessen, A.M., Hoekman, K., Poot, M. and Pinedo, H.M. (1997) Highly Sensitive and Specific Detection of P-Glycoprotein Function for Haematological and Solid Tumour Cells Using a Novel Nucleic Acid Stain. British Journal of Cancer, 76, 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1997.503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94724-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sparrow, R.L. and Tippett, E. (2005) Discrimination of Live and Early Apoptotic Mononuclear Cells by the Fluorescent SYTO 16 Vital Dye. Journal of Immunological Methods, 305, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2005.07.017</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>