<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Diabetes Mellitus</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5831</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jdm.2019.93014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JDM-94528</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Mycotic Infections in Diabetic Patients in Casablanca
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Annelie</surname><given-names>Kérékou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siham</surname><given-names>El Aziz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alihonou</surname><given-names>Dédjan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asma</surname><given-names>Chadli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>Farouqi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic Diseases Department, Ibn Rochd University Hospital Center of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition Department CNHU-HKM, Cotonou, Bénin</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>08</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>146</fpage><lpage>151</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Introduction: The diabetes constitutes the factor risk of mycotic infections. The pathogenic agents depend on the climate, geography and the migration. The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of the mycotic infections within the hospitalized diabetic patients, to describe their localization and identify the responsible germs. Patients and methods: It is about a descriptive and retrospective study conducted from November 2015 to March 2016 in endocrinology office at CHU Ibn Roch of Casablanca. It was included all diabetic patients hospitalized with whom mycotic infection has been suspected. Results: In total 350 diabetic patients have been hospitalized during the period of research. A mycotic infection has been suspected in 138 patients corresponding to the prevalence of 39.4 percent. The means localizations of mycotic infections were feet (intertrigos: 38.4%), onychomycosis (29%), vulvovaginal (21.7%) and mouth (oral candidiasis: 13.3%). The most frequent pathogenic agents were dermatophytes (
  <em>Trichophyton rubrum</em>: 61%, 
  <em>Trichophyton mentagrophytes</em>: 6.3%) and 
  <em>Candida albicans</em> (23.1%). The direct test and the culture were negative in 7.3%. Conclusion: One-third of the diabetic patients showed a mycotic infection. The feet, constitute the predilection localization of mycotic infections in the diabetic. The dermatophytes and Candida albicans constitute the most frequent pathogenic agents found in our study.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mycotic</kwd><kwd> Infection</kwd><kwd> Diabetes</kwd><kwd> Dermatophytes</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The diabetes constitutes a contributing factor to mycotic infections. This is due to altered powers of phagocytosis and chemotaxis of white blood cells. The infections frequently described are the orodigestive candidiasis, the intertrigos, the onychomycosis, the perleches, the vulvovaginitis, the balanites and the paronychia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref1">1</xref>] . Onychomycosis prevalence reaching 26 to 35 percent in the diabetic patients, higher than in non diabetics. An intertrigo is estimated to 32 percent in the diabetic population against 7 percent in non-diabetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref2">2</xref>] . The relative risk of onychomycosis is estimated between 1.5 and 2.8 according to the studies in the diabetics on relation with the general population and the risk of intertrigo at 2.3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref3">3</xref>] . The pathogenic agents depend on the climate, geography and the migration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref4">4</xref>] . The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of the mycotic infections within the hospitalized diabetic patients, to describe their localization and identify the responsible germs.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>It is about a descriptive and retrospective study conducted from November 2015 to March 2016 in endocrinology office at CHU Ibn Roch of Casablanca.</p><p>It was included all diabetic patient hospitalized with whom mycotic infection has been suspected. The samples are taken in parasitology laboratory. The variable studied concerned the clinic signs, their localization, the paraclinics data. The data collection has been done with questionnaire and statistical analysis with software SPSS 20.0</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Socio-demographic characteristic</p><p>In total 350 diabetic patients have been hospitalized during the period of research (6 months). A mycotic infection has been suspected in 138 patients corresponding to the prevalence of 39.4 percent. The average age was 50 &#177; 8 years and a sex-ratio (H/F) of 0.64. Antecedent of mycotic infection has been found in 50 percent of patients. The mean duration of diabetes was 13 &#177; 5 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Clinical aspects</p><p>In 138 patients the intertrigos were found in 53 patients (38.4 percent), the onychomycosis in 40 patients (29 percent), an association of intertrigos and onychomycosis in 23 patients (16.6), the oral candidiasis in 17 patients (13.3 percent), the vulvovaginitis in 12 female patients (21.7 percent), the mycosis of large folds (under breast and or inguinal) in 11 patients (7.99 percents), an association of vulvovaginitis and mycosis of the large folds in 10 female patients(7.2 percent), the urinary tract infection in three female patients (2.17 percents), digestive candidiasis revealed in the gastroscopy in two patients (1.4 percents) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>The mycosis is not linked to the sex as it shows the value of chi carre = 0.2562 (p = 0.6128), also the mycotic infection is not associated to a particular type of diabete (p = 0.2568).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows a macerated intertrigo responsible of an erysipelas and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows an oral candidiasis.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristic of diabetics patients suspected with mycotic infection</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diabete type 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diabete type 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex-ratio H/F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11/9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43/75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6128</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HbA1c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2 &#177; 1.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8 &#177; 2.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2568</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of diabetes (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antecedent of mycotic infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Localization of mycosis infection</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Localization of mycosis infection</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequence</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intertrigo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Onychomycosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oral candidiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vulvo-vaginitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >mycosis of large folds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >urinary tract infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >digestive candidiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Association Vulvo-vaginitis and mycosis of large folds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Association Onychomycosis and intertrigo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Paraclinic aspects</p><p>They were all in chronic imbalance glycemy with an average hemoglobin glycated of 10.5 &#177; 2 percent.</p><p>By the lack of means, it is only in 95 patients that we have been able to realize a mycological test. The Trichophyton rubrum was identified in 58 patients (61 percents), the Trichophyton mentagrophytes in 6 patients (6.3 percents), the Candida albicans in 23 patients (23.1 percents) and the Candida parapsilosis in two patients (2.1 percents).</p><p>The direct test and the culture were negative in seven patients (7.3 percent). It therefore appears that the confirmation rate is 92.6 percent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The mean age of our study population is 50 &#177; 8 years and this is due to the predominance of the type 2 diabetic patients. This mean age is inferior to what found by El F&#233;kih N and al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref5">5</xref>] and Gupta A.K et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref3">3</xref>] which were respectively 55 &#177; 8 years and 56.1 &#177; 7 years.</p><p>J. Fergermann and al have estimated at least the third of diabetic patients who would present an onycomychosis which corroborate our results in which 29% of the patients show an onychomycosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In our study the mycosis is not linked to the sex whereas Eckhard M and al have found that foot mycosis infections are more frequent in males [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The mycotic infection is not associated to a particular diabete in our research.</p><p>The mean duration of diabetes was 13 &#177; 5 years in our research which is similar to 15.3 &#177; 1.2 years found by Gupta A.K and al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The most frequent localizations of mycosis are the inter toe space and the nail which correspond with the results of El F&#233;kih and al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref5">5</xref>] . The intertrigo constitutes the veritable gaterway for the bacterial infections potentially serious such as the erysipelas, the cellulitis and the fasciitis.</p><p>Our research reveals the rate of suspicions of mycosis infection at 39.4percent, inferior to the rates of 46 percent and 53.7 percent found respectively by Gupta and al and El F&#233;kih and al.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Results of mycological test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T rubrun</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T mentagrophytes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C albicans</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C parasilosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sterile</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intertrigo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Onychomycosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oral candidiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vulvovaginitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mycosis of large folds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urinary tract infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive candidiasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (61%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (6.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (23.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (2.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (7.3%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Abbreviation: T = trichophyton C = candida.</p><p>The rates of confirmation of mycotic infections in our study are 92.6 percent (88/95) comparable to that of El F&#233;kih and al who have confirmed the mycotic infection in 81 patients over the 86 patients suspected of mycotic infection. Our rate is superior to that of Gupta A. K and al who have confirmed the mycosic infection in 144 patients over 253 patients suspected.</p><p>In our research the dermatophytes are the pathogenic agents most frequents in mycotic infection of feet. This is similar to results of a lot of authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref8">8</xref>] . The Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Candida albicans appears to be more common in the mucosa in our study, which is comparable to the results of Jhugroo C et al., who found that mycotic infections in the mouth of the diabetic were due mainly to Candida albicans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The glycemic imbalance noticed in our patients could explain itself by the fact they have been hospitalized in the framwork of glycemic imbalance or of a diabete decompensation. This glycemic imbalance is seen in most study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94528-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>One third of the diabetic patients showed a mycotic infection. All the diabetics’ patients presenting a mycotic infection were in chronic glycemic imbalance. The feet constitute the predilection localization of mycotic infections in the diabetic. The dermatophytes constitute the most frequent pathogenic agents found.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>K&#233;r&#233;kou, A., El Aziz, S., D&#233;djan, A., Chadli, A. and Farouqi, A. (2019) Mycotic Infections in Diabetic Patients in Casablanca. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 9, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2019.93014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94528-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senet, P. and Chosidow, O. (2002) Manifestations cutanéomuqueuses du diabète. Encycl Méd Chir (Editions Scientifiques et Médicales Elsevier SAS, Paris, tous droits réservés), Endocrinologie-Nutrition, 5 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yosipovitch, G., Hodak, E., Vardi, P., Shraga, I., Karp, M., Sprecher, E., et al. (1998) The Prevalence of Cutaneous Manifestations in DM Patients and Their Association with Diabetes Risk Factors and Microvascular Complications. Diabetes Care, 21, 506-509. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.4.506</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, A.K. and Humke, S. (2000) The Prevalence and Management of Onychomycosis in Diabetic Patients. European Journal of Dermatology, 10, 379-384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faergemann, J. and Baran, R. (2003) Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Onychomycosis. British Journal of Dermatology, 149, 1-4. 
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.149.s65.4.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Fékih, N., Fazaa, B., Zouari, B., et al. (2009) Les mycoses du pied chez le diabétique: études prospectives de 150 patients. Journal de Mycologie Médicale, 19, 29-33. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2008.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eckhard, M., Lengler, A., Liersch, J., Bretzel, R.G. and Mayser, P. (2011) Fungal Foot Infections in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Results of Two Independent Investigations. Mycoses, 50, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2007.01425.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cathcart, S., Cantrell, W. and Elewski, B.E. (2009) Onychomycosis and Diabetes. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venerology, 23, 1119-1122. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03225.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, A.K., Jain, H.C., Lynde, C.W., et al. (1997) Prevalence and Epidemiology of Unsuspected Onychomycosis in Patients Visiting Dermatologists’ Offices in Ontario, Canada: A Multicenter Survey 2001 Patients. International Journal of Dermatology, 36, 783-787. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00349.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poradzka, A., Jasik, M., Karnafal, W. and Fiedor, P. (2013) Clinical Aspects of Fungal Infections in Diabetes. Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica-Drug Research, 70, 587-596.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gulcan, A., Gulcan, E., Oksuz, S., Sahin, I. and Kaya, D. (2011) Prevalence of Toenail Onychomycosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Evaluation of Risk Factors. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 101, 49-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94528-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jhugroo, C., Divakar, D.D., Jhugroo, P., et al. (2019) Characterization of Oral Mucosa Lesions and Prevalence of Yeasts in Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Study. Microbial Pathogenesis, 126, 363-367.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.028</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>