<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2019.108029</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-94323</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Swallowing Function before and after Subtotal Glossectomy and Reconstruction with a Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap: A Case Report
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kazuhide</surname><given-names>Matsunaga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hirohisa</surname><given-names>Kusuhara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akifumi</surname><given-names>Enomoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Testuji</surname><given-names>Nagata</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takuya</surname><given-names>Yoshimura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akinori</surname><given-names>Takeshita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noritaka</surname><given-names>Isogai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Suguru</surname><given-names>Hamada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Norifumi</surname><given-names>Nakamura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Narikazu</surname><given-names>Uzawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>The 2<sup>nd</sup> Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School &amp;amp; Graduate School of Dentistry Osaka University, Osaka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Field of Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Kagoshima University, Graduate School of
Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nara Hospital Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Nara, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>280</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Purpose: Swallowing function was in a patient with tongue cancer that was evaluated with video fluorography before and after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis muscuocutaneous flap. 
   Materials and Methods: A 41-year-old man underwent subtotal glossectomy and retained the unilateral posterior mylohyoid and unilateral stylohyoid muscles. The structure of the flap was evaluated postoperatively. To assess swallowing function, video fluorography was performed before surgery, 1 month after surgery and 1 year after surgery. Testing involved 1) ability to hold 10 mL of liquid in the oral cavity, 2) epiglottis turnover, 3) the presence of aspiration, 4) hyoid bone movement, and 5) maximum width of the esophageal entrance. 
   Results: The flap was protuberant postoperatively. The patient was able to hold the test diet in the oral cavity before and after surgery. Epiglottis turnover was good before surgery but insufficient after surgery. Aspiration during swallowing was not observed before or after surgery. At rest, the hyoid bone sagged postoperatively, in comparison with preoperatively. Hyoid bone movement and width of the esophageal entrance decreased after surgery; however, they demonstrated gradual recovery. 
   Conclusions: For good postoperative swallowing function after subtotal glossectomy, it is necessary to perform reconstruction with protuberant flap and to retain the suprahyoid muscles as much as possible. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Subtotal Glossectomy</kwd><kwd> Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap</kwd><kwd> Swallowing Function</kwd><kwd> Hyoid Bone Movement</kwd><kwd> Width of the Esophageal Entrance</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is important for reconstructive surgeons to evaluate swallowing function in patients with tongue cancer who have undergone glossectomy and flap reconstruction. We were interested in a reconstructive method that would preserve swallowing function in patients who had undergone more than hemiglossectomy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref3">3</xref>] . We previously reported on postoperative swallowing function in patients who had undergone subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] . We suggested that for good postoperative swallowing and hyoid bone movement after subtotal glossectomy, it is necessary to perform reconstruction with a flap that has sufficient volume and to retain the bilateral stylohyoid muscles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] . However, we had never evaluated preoperative and postoperative serial swallowing function in patients who underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate preoperative and postoperative swallowing function in a patient after such reconstruction. In this study, swallowing function was evaluated with video fluorography in a patient with tongue cancer before and after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Patient</title><p>The patient was a 41-year-old man with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue on the left side (T<sub>4</sub>N<sub>0</sub>M<sub>0</sub>). The patient underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap at Kindai University Hospital, Osaka in 2008. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> lists the details of the surgical procedure. With regard to preservation of the suprahyoid muscles, the patient retained the unilateral posterior mylohyoid and unilateral stylohyoid muscles (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Hyoid bone suspension was not performed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Postoperatively,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Characteristics of a patient who underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Neck dissection</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conserved tongue area</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conserved suprahyoid muscles</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hyoid bone suspension</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral basal tongue (right side)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral mylohyoid (Posterior) Unilateral stylohyoid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the patient did not receive chemotherapy or radiation therapy.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Evaluation of Swallowing Function</title><p>1) Postoperative flap structure</p><p>We evaluated the structure of the flap both 1 month and 1 year after surgery. The flap could be classified as protuberant, semiprotuberant, flat, or depressed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>2) Video fluorography</p><p>Swallowing function was evaluated with video fluorography before surgery, 1 month after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. In the test, the following items were evaluated with a 10 mL of liquid: a) holding the liquid in the oral cavity, b) epiglottis turnover, c) aspiration, d) hyoid bone movement, and e) maximum width of the esophageal entrance.</p><p>To examine the extent of hyoid bone movement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and the maximal widening of the esophageal entrance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), the method of Matsunaga et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref6">6</xref>] was used. Points A and B represented the lower and upper borders of the fourth cervical vertebra, respectively. Points C and C&#162;represented the hyoid bone at rest and at the highest elevation, respectively. Then the distance from point A to point C (line AC) and the distance from point A to point C&#162; (line AC&#162;) were measured (relative to the height of the third cervical vertebra, which on a lateral image was set as 10.0). Angles BAC and BAC&#162; represented the angles when the hyoid bone angle was at rest and at the highest elevation, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the method of assessing the extent of hyoid bone movement. The Y-axis was parallel to the line from point A</p><p>to point B (line AB), and the X-axis was perpendicular to line AB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Line CC’ represented the distance between the position of the hyoid bone at rest and its position at the highest elevation in relation to the height of the third cervical vertebra set, as 10.0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Angle C’CX was the angle of hyoid bone movement (Line CX was a line parallel to the X-axis) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the method of assessing the maximum width of the esophageal entrance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref7">7</xref>] . The maximum width of the esophageal entrance was measured during swallowing in relation to the height of the third cervical vertebra (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>1) Postoperative flap structure</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the intraoral appearance 1 year after surgery. The flap had a protuberant structure postoperatively.</p><p>2) Video fluorography</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the results of testing for ability to diet hold the liquid in the oral cavity, for epiglottis turnover, and for the presence of aspiration.</p><p>1) Holding the liquid in the oral cavity</p><p>Both before and after surgery, the patient was able to hold the liquid in the oral cavity, and flow of the liquid into the pharynx was not observed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>2) Epiglottis turnover</p><p>Epiglottis turnover was good before surgery, however, postoperative epiglottis turnovers were insufficient (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>3) Aspiration</p><p>Aspiration during swallowing was not observed before or after surgery (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>(4)Hyoid bone movement</p><p>The position of the hyoid bone at rest before surgery was different from that after surgery (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The preoperative and postoperative positions of the hyoid bone at the highest elevation, however, were different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The distances of hyoid bone movement before surgery, 1 month after</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Findings on video fluorography</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ability to hold the test food in the oral cavity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Epiglottis turnover</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspiration</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preoperative Postoperative, 1 month Postoperative, 1 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good Good Good</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good Insufficient Insufficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >None None None</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Data for calculation of hyoid bone position</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Position of hyoid bone at rest</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >The position of the hyoid bone at highest elevation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angle BAC (˚)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AC’</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angle BAC’ (˚)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preoperative Postoperative, 1 month Postoperative, 1 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4 29.3 28.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2 77.0 77.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.4 34.9 36.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.2 71.5 70.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>AC: Distance of point C from point A (the longitudinal length of the three cervical vertebra on lateral images was established as 10.0); AC&#162;: Distance of point C&#162; from point A (the longitudinal length of the three cervical vertebra on lateral images was established as 10.0); Angle BAC (˚): The angle of hyoid bone at rest; Angle BAC&#162; (˚): The angle of hyoid bone at highest elevation.</p><p>surgery and 1 year after surgery were 12.3, 6.7, and 8.6, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The angles of hyoid bone movement in anterior and upward directions before surgery, 1 month after surgery and 1 year after surgery were 53.8, 50.0 and 46.1 degree, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). After surgery, the hyoid bone at rest sagged, in comparison with its preoperative position at rest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The hyoid bone</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The extent of hyoid bone movement</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CC’</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Angle C’CX(˚)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preoperative Postoperative, 1 month Postoperative, 1 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3 6.7 8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.8 50.0 46.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>CC’: Distance of hyoid bone movement; Angle C’CX: The angle of hyoid bone movement.</p><p>demonstrated less movement after surgery than before surgery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). However, the hyoid bone movement increased 1 year after surgery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>5) Maximum widths of the esophageal entrance</p><p>The maximum width of the esophageal entrance before surgery, and 1 month after surgery and 1 year after surgery were 9.9, 6.3 and 7.8, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Postoperative maximum widths of the esophageal entrance were smaller than the preoperative widths. However, maximum width of the esophageal entrance 1 year after surgery increased somewhat (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>).</p><p>Swallowing function in the patient remained good 3 years postoperatively. Moreover, till the time of drafting, the patient the patient has survived without recurrence or metastasis.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>It is important to improve postoperative swallowing function after glossectomy and reconstruction of the tongue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref3">3</xref>] . We previously investigated swallowing</p><p>function in patients who had undergone subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap 3 years postoperatively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] . However, we had never evaluated preoperative and postoperative swallowing function, serial change in hyoid bone movement, and width of the esophageal entrance in patients who underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap. In this study, we undertook this evaluation.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Association between Flap Structure and Swallowing Function</title><p>After subtotal glossectomy, it is important to reconstruct the large defect with an appropriate flap to improve or maintain postoperative swallowing function. We previously reported that for good postoperative swallowing after subtotal glossectomy, it is necessary to perform reconstruction with a flap that has sufficient volume [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] . Kimata et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref5">5</xref>] suggested that protuberant and semiprotuberant flaps demonstrated better postoperative swallowing function than did flat or depressed flaps; therefore, the large tongue defect should be reconstructed with the wider and thicker flaps. Chang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref8">8</xref>] suggested that defects after subtotal or total glossectomy should be reconstructed with a thicker and bulkier flap to optimize postoperative speech and swallowing function. The patient in this study, who had undergone reconstruction of a flap with sufficient volume, demonstrated good ability to hold liquid in the oral cavity after surgery, and flow of liquid into the pharynx was not observed after surgery. These findings demonstrate the necessity of reconstruction of a protuberant flap for good postoperative swallowing after subtotal glossectomy. Some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref9">9</xref>] have suggested that functional reconstruction of a flap with both sensory and motor innervation can result in better postoperative swallowing outcomes after subtotal glossectomy. In the future, we hope to examine functional reconstruction of tongue defect with innervated flaps.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Association between Hyoid Bone Movement and Swallowing Function</title><p>With regard to the association between resection of the suprahyoid muscles and hyoid bone movement during swallowing, Fujimoto et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref10">10</xref>] suggested that the hyoid bone movement deceased significantly after resection of the suprahyoid muscles. We reported that after bilateral resection of the anterior and posterior bellies of the digastric, mylohyoid, geniohyoid, and hyoglossus muscles, the forward and upward movement of the hyoid bone was impeded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref11">11</xref>] . However, the degree of the hyoid bone movement during swallowing had not been quantitatively evaluated. Therefore, we evaluated postoperative swallowing function in patents who underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref7">7</xref>] . We found that in patients who have undergone subtotal glossectomy and bilateral neck dissection-, the extent of hyoid bone muvement was definitely smaller than that in patients after only unilateral neck dissection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94323-ref6">6</xref>] . However, we had not quantitatively evaluated changes in hyoid bone movement before and after surgery. In this study, we evaluated change in hyoid bone movement and width of the esophageal entrance in a patient who underwent subtotal glossectomy and bilateral neck dissection. The positions of the hyoid bone at rest were lower after surgery than before surgery because almost all of the bilateral suprahyoid muscles had been resected without hyoid bone suspension. Furthermore, hyoid bone movement and width of the esophageal entrance decreased after surgery; however, they demonstrated gradual recovery, which may have been a result of strengthening of the retained suprahyoid muscles and compensatory reinforcement of the infrahyoid muscles.</p><p>The limitation of this study is that it is a case report; more cases like this should be studied. Furthermore, a comparative study analyzing swallowing function based on hyoid bone suspension in patients who have undergone subtotal glossectomy is needed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In a patient with tongue cancer who underwent subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap, swallowing function evaluated with video fluorography before and after the surgery, our findings showed that for good postoperative swallowing function and hyoid bone movement after subtotal glossectomy, reconstruction should entail the creation of a protuberant flap, and the suprahyoid muscles should be retained as much as possible.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to Enago (http://www.enago.jp/) for the English language review.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Matsunaga, K., Kusuhara, H., Enomoto, A., Nagata, T., Yoshimura, T., Takeshita, A., Isogai, N., Hamada, S., Nakamura, N. and Uzawa, N. (2019) Swallowing Function before and after Subtotal Glossectomy and Reconstruction with a Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap: A Case Report. Surgical Science, 10, 271-280. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2019.108029</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94323-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yokoo, S., Komori, T., Umeda, M., Takenono, I., Hashikawa, K., Hanagaki, H. and Tahara, S. (2001) Functional Reconstruction of Mobile Tongue and Suprahyoid Muscles after Resection of Cancer of the Tongue. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 39, 252-255. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjom.2001.0636</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hsiao, H.T., Leu, Y.S., Chang, S.H. and Lee, J.T. (2003) Swallowing Function in Patients Who Underwent Hemiglossectomy: Comparison of Primary Closure and Free Radial Forearm Flap Reconstruction with Videoflouroscopy. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 50, 450-455. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000044147.09310.E8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engel, H., Huang, J.J., Lin, C.Y., Lam, W., Kao, H.K., Gazyakan, E. and Cheng, M.H. (2010) A Strategic Approach for Tongue Reconstruction to Achieve Predictable and Improved Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 126, 1967-1977. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44742</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsunaga, K., Kusuhara, H., Enomoto, A., Mori, K., Kitano, M., Mukai, T., Shimoide, T., Doi, K., Isogai, N. and Hamada, S. (2017) Swallowing Function in Patients Who Underwent After Subtotal Glossectomy and Reconstruction with a Rectus Abdominis Musculicutaneous Flap. Acta Medica Kindai University, 42, 49-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimata, Y., Sakuraba, M., Hishinuma, S., Ebihara, S., Hayashi, R., Asakage, T., Nakatsuka, T. and Harii, K. (2003) Analysis of the Relations between the Shape of the Reconstructed Tongue and Postoperative Functions after Subtotal or Total Glossectomy. Laryngoscope, 113, 905-909.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200305000-00024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsunaga, K., Oobu, K., Ohishi, M. and Isogai, N. (2004) The Evaluation of Swallowing Function in Unilateral Radical Neck Dissection Cases Using the Picture Analysis Equipment. Analysis about the Position of the Hyoid and Opening of the Esophageal Entrance. The Journal of Japanese Society of Stomatognathic Function, 11, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.7144/sgf.11.35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsunaga, K., Mori, K., Asamura, S., Nagata, T. and Isogai, N. (2008) Swallowing Function in Patients Who Underwent Hemiglossectomy and Reconstruction with a Pectralis Major Myocutaneous Flap. Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons, 33, 829-836. https://doi.org/10.4030/jjcs.33.829</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, E.I., Yu, P., Skoracki, R.J., Lui, J. and Hanasono, M.M. (2015) Comprehensive Analysis of Functional Outcomes and Survival after Microvascular Reconstruction of Glossectomy Defects. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 22, 3061-3069.  
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4386-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ozkan, O., Ozkan, O., Derin, A.T., Bektas, G., Cinpolat, A., Duymaz, A., Mardini, S., Cigna, E. and Chen, H.C. (2015) True Functional Reconstruction of Total or Subtotal Glossectomy Defects Using a Chimeric Anterolateral Thigh Flap with Both Sensorial and Motor Innervation. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 74, 557-564.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182a6add7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujimoto, Y., Hasegawa, Y., Matsuura, H. and Nakayama, B. (1996) A Quantitative Study of Videoflouorography Using a Personal Computer—Analysis of Postoperative Dysphagia of Oral and Orohpharyngeal Cancer Patients. Japanese Journal of Head and Neck Cancer, 22, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.5981/jjhnc1974.22.72</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94323-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsunaga, K., Oobu, K. and Ohishi, M. (2002) The Clinical Study on Pre and Postoperative Swallowing Function in Tongue Cancer Patients. The Japanese Journal of Dysphagia Rehabilitation, 6, 53-64.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>