<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2019.107088</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-94082</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Influence of Agitation Rate on the Growth of MD2 Pineapple Protocorm-Like Bodies and Shoots in Liquid-Shake Culture
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zuraida</surname><given-names>Ab Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hartinee</surname><given-names>Abbas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayu</surname><given-names>Nazreena Othman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>Zaliha Wan Sembok</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>School of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Horticulture Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Sintok, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1233</fpage><lpage>1238</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of agitation rate on the increase in fresh weight of MD2 pineapple protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) and shoots cultured in liquid medium. PLBs were cultured in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks (7 g per flask) containing MS medium and plant growth regulators (1.5 mg/L 6-Benzylaminopurine, BAP and 0.2 mg/L 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid, NAA). The orbital shaker was set at speeds of 50, 80, 100, 120, and 150 rpm. After 40 days, the cultures shaken at 80 rpm showed the highest fresh weight and the highest number of shoots at 76 g and 41 shoots, respectively. A comparative study of agitation found that 80 rpm was the best speed which enhanced both PLB and shoot formation. The findings in the present study would be helpful in setting up large-scale 
  in vitro
   mass propagation of MD2 pineapple.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pineapple MD2</kwd><kwd> Micropropagation</kwd><kwd> Liquid-Shake Culture</kwd><kwd> Agitation Rate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A lack of plant material is a major problem faced by the Malaysian pineapple industry. This is due to the continued growth of pineapple cultivation areas and the increasing demand for MD2 plant materials. In conventional pineapples breeding, the selection method is tedious and needs several generations of backcrossing to develop a stable cultivar with desired traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref1">1</xref>] . The pineapple (Ananas comosus), a tropical species, is the most economically significant plant in the family Bromeliaceae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref3">3</xref>] . The plants begin flowering after five to ten months and set fruit in the following six months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref4">4</xref>] . The pineapple is a major tropical fruit in terms of world production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref5">5</xref>] , with the MD2 variety being among the highly commercialized cultivars especially popular in the European Union market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref6">6</xref>] . The National Key Economic Area (NKEA) under Malaysia’s Permanent Food Production Area has listed MD2 as one of the top seven tropical fruits in terms of production output in Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The variety, a deep golden fruit, is in high demand owing to its aroma, blemish-free flesh and high sugar content, besides being rich in vitamins A, B, and C, ripening evenly and having a long shelf life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref9">9</xref>] . Pineapples can be cultivated from cuttings obtained from the top of the fruit. Micropropagation of MD2 pineapple has also been reported through direct in vitro micropropagation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref8">8</xref>] and indirect regeneration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref1">1</xref>] . Multiple plantlets can be produced in vitro using liquid-shake culture, this approach attaining an increase of up to four-fold as compared with culture on solid medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref10">10</xref>] . The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of agitation rate of the orbital shaker on MD2 pineapple propagation and quality, and to compare these results with those obtained with cultures on solid medium.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>MD2 Pineapple suckers were used in this study. The pieces of MD2 pineapple suckers approximately 25 - 30 cm were used as explants for in vitro culture. The pineapple leaf blade removed, the inside of the explant was trimmed to 5 - 8 cm. It was followed by washed thoroughly in running tap water and detergent. The explant then immersed in fungicide (5% w/v Benlate) for one hour and rinsing with sterile distilled water. The explants were immersed in CloroxTM (5.25% sodium hypochlorite) at 50% (v/v) for 15 minutes then followed by soaking in 20% (v/v) CloroxTM for 10 mins. The explant was then rinsed thrice with sterilized distilled water, which all the procedure conducted in a laminar flow chamber. The sterilized explants were then cut to 1 - 2 cm pieces as described by Zuraida et al. (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Sterilized explants were cultured on solid Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref11">11</xref>] ) that was supplemented with 30 mg/L sucrose, 5 mg/L benzyl aminopurine (BAP) and 0.3% agar. The cultures were maintained in the medium for three months before sub-culturing on to fresh medium at monthly intervals. After a further three months, the microshoots obtained were maintained in the Murashige and Skoog (MS) liquid medium that was supplemented with 30 mg/L sucrose, 1 mg/L benzyl aminopurine (BAP) and 0.1 mg/L 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) for three months before sub-culturing into fresh medium at monthly intervals. After a further three months, the protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) obtained were transferred on to liquid medium in 250 ml shaking flasks, oscillating at 120 rpm to obtain the plant material</p><p>used in the study. After a month, most of the treatment showed increasing in.</p><p>In each treatment, 7 g pineapple PLBs were cultured in 250 ml flasks containing MS liquid medium supplemented with 1.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L NAA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)). The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8, then autoclaving at 121˚C for 15 mins. The cultures of PLBs were placed on orbital shakers set at different rates of agitation, i.e. 50, 80, 100, 120, and 150 rpm. Solid medium (SL) cultures and static liquid cultures with no shaking (SLC) were used as controls. All cultures were maintained in the growth room at 25˚C under cool-white fluorescent lighting (12 hours light/darkness). Measurements were expressed as total fresh weight (PLBs and plantlets) and the number of shoots produced after 40 days in culture. Total fresh weight was recorded after the samples were dried on filter paper for 1 hour to remove surface water. A completely randomized design was adopted, with 10 flasks used for each treatment. The means and standard deviations (indicated as &#177; values) were calculated for the treatment responses. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>After forty days of cultivation in liquid medium containing 1.5 mg/L BAP and 0.2 mg/L NAA, the PLBs in all shaking treatments showed increases in growth. The highest total fresh weight of 76 g was obtained with shaking at 80 rpm. One third of the cultures in this treatment produced shoots that were characterized by intense green coloration and well-developed expanded leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)). The PLBs obtained with this treatment were bigger than those in the other treatments, showed clumping and produced more shoots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(e), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(f)). Cultures that were shaken at a lower rate (50 rpm) or higher rate (100 rpm) produced 63 g and 61 g of tissue fresh weight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Both the 50 rpm and 100 rpm treatments also produced shoots, whereas few shoots were produced when the PLBs were cultured in flasks shaking at 120 rpm, and none at 150 rpm. The highest number of offshoots (41 per flask) was obtained in cultures shaken at 80 rpm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Shaking at 120 rpm resulted in the production of more PLBs that appeared fresh and green (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(g)). PLBs in flasks shaken at 150 rpm turned brown due to the presence of phenolics, but were still growing well nonetheless (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(h)). The control cultures on solid medium and on</p><p>unshaken liquid medium showed growth rates lower than those of the shaken cultures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). These controls produced some shoots, but fewer in number than from cultures shaken at 50 or 80 rpm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Liquid culture systems tend to enhance growth and propagation as compared with solid medium cultures. According to Zuraida et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref10">10</xref>] , liquid-shake cultures are better at producing multiple shoots as compared with solid medium cultures. The continuous shaking or a rotary shaker probably facilitates increased uptake of the nutrients in the medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref13">13</xref>] . Hamid et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref1">1</xref>] reported that the highest number of pineapple shoots obtained on solid MS medium containing 3 mg/L BAP + 1 mg/L NAA was only 15. Hence, the liquid medium with shaking at 80 rpm used in the present study performed far better in shoot multiplication. In vitro growth, multiplication and elongation of Celastrus bolivitianum have also been observed to be improved in liquid culture as compared with solid medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref14">14</xref>] . The improved growth in liquid system may be attributed to the absence of interfering impurities from agar and the better availability of water and nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94082-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Liquid-shake culture systems are conducive to the development of MD2 pineapple PLBs and shoots. Such a system is suitable for the tissue culture of MD2 pineapple for rapid and efficient clonal propagation. This finding suggested to great potential for upscaling the production of MD2 pineapple using liquid culture in the bioreactor system.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI) for providing financial support under the RMK11 Research Grant.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rahman, Z.A., Abbas, H., Othman, A.N. and Sembok, W.Z.W. (2019) Influence of Agitation Rate on the Growth of MD2 Pineapple Protocorm-Like Bodies and Shoots in Liquid-Shake Culture. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 10, 1233-1238. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.107088</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94082-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamid, N.S., Bukhori, M.F.M. and Jalil, M. (2013) Direct and Indirect Plant Regenerations of Pineapple var. MD2 (Ananas comosus L.). Malaysian Applied Biology Journal, 42, 61-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morton, J.F. (1987) Pineapple, Ananas comosus.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge, G. and Leal, F. (2003) Morphology, Anatomy, and Taxonomy. In: Bartholomew, D.P., Paull, R.E. and Rohrbach, K.G., Eds., The Pineapple: Botany, Production, and Uses, CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Birgit, B. (2010) Pineapple Growing. http://tropicalpermaculture.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAOSTAT (2010) Tropical Fruits. http://www.fao.org/3/y5143e/y5143e1a.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2006) Pineapple News. Newsletter of the Pineapple Working Group, International Society for Horticultural Science.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malaysian Pineapple Industry Board. http://www.mpib.gov.my</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Danso, K.E., Ayeh, K.O., Oduro, V., Amiteye, S. and Amoatey, H.M. (2008) Effect of 6-Benzylaminopurine and Naphthalene Acetic Acid on in Vitro Production of MD2 Pineapple Planting Materials. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3, 614-619.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akbar, M.A., Karmarka, B. and Roy, S. (2003) Callus Induction and High Frequency Plant Regeneration of Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.). Plant Tissue Culture, 13, 109-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, Z.A., Abbas, H. and Othman, A.N. (2018) Rapid Micropropagation of MD2 Pineapple (Ananas comosus L.) Using the Temporary Immersion Systems (TIS) and Liquid-Shake Culture (LSC). Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 8833-8836.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-497. 
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akin-Idowu, P.E., Solomon Akinyemi, S.O. and Olubunmi Ibitoye, D. (2014) Influence of Medium Type and Growth Regulators on in Vitro Micropropagation of Pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.), var. Smooth cayenne). African Journal of Plant Science, 8, 450-456. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2014.1184</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ziv, M (2005) Simple Bioreactors for Mass Propagation of Plants. In: Hvoslef-Eide, A.K. and Preil, W., Eds., Liquid Culture Systems for in Vitro Plant Propagation, Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3200-5_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vyas, S., Rao, M.S., Suthar, R.K. and Purohit, S.D. (2008) Liquid Culture System Stimulates in Vitro Growth and Shoot Multiplication in Four Medicinally Important Plants. Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Science and Biotechnology, 2, 96-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94082-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etienne, H. and Berthouly, M. (2002) Temporary Immersion Systems in Plant Micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 69, 215-231. 
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015668610465</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>