<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2019.107063</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-94055</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Method Development and Validation for the Quantification of Acrylamide in Potato Chips and Other Locally Available Food by LC-MS/MS in Bangladesh
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mala</surname><given-names>Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Moniruzzaman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mamudul</surname><given-names>Hasan Razu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Designated Reference Institute for Chemical Measurements (DRiCM), Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>876</fpage><lpage>892</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A sensitive, precise, accurate and simple in house validated Liquid Chromatography and Tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) analytical method was developed for the quantification of acrylamide in potato chips, a probable carcinogenic and neurotoxic compound in fried food items. Acrylamide was extracted and cleaned up by QuEChERS method, then analyzed by triple qu
  adrupole mass spectrophotometer using positive electrospray-ionization
   mode and d3-Acrylamide internal standard. The analyte and internal standard were separated on a 
  reversed
  -
  phase
   C18 column (100
   
  &#215;
   
  2.0
   
  mm, 2.5
   
  μm) by gradient elution with water and methanol containing 0.1% formic acid as mobile phase. The analytical method was fully validated by assessment of linearity, specificity, precision, accuracy, selectivity and robustness with relative standard deviation of less than 4%. The calibration curves were found linear with correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) of 0.9997 over the concentration range 5
   
  -
   
  500
   
  μg/L. The recoveries of Acrylamide in the concentration of 250, 400, and 500
   
  μg/L were 97% to 104%. Based on 
  the 
  signal
   to noise ratio, the lower limit of detection (LOD) and lower limit of quantification (LOQ) were achieved 2.0
   
  μg/L and 4.0
   
  μg/L respectively. The proposed method was also applied 
  to
   other available most popular 24 types of food (265 number of sample) first time in Bangladesh. The highest level of acrylamide has been found in fried products with the range of 197.04 μg/L to 114.63 μg/L, protein
  -
  rich
   food lies between 79.76 to 89.14 μg/L whereas baked food products exhibited less content in the range of 35.23 to 51.17 μg/L.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>LC-MS/MS</kwd><kwd> Acrylamide</kwd><kwd> Linearity</kwd><kwd> Accuracy</kwd><kwd> Precision</kwd><kwd> LOD</kwd><kwd> LOQ</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Food habits are changing rapidly due to variations of lifestyles, economies and global culture. Fried food items have gained its popularity among various age people, especially young generation because of its short time of preparation and consumption. To obtain acceptable food products, it is necessary to maintain nutrients like minerals, carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins, enzymes, etc. But, nutrients may be destroyed or lost when foods are processed because of their sensitivity to heat, light, oxygen, pH of the solvent or a combination of these [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref1">1</xref>] . Even some protein quality, micronutrients, vitamin and amino acid can be reduced during frying of food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref2">2</xref>] . Furthermore, to give satisfying taste and crunch to fried foods by using hydrogenated oils may influence the risk of several diseases like obesity, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, type-2 diabetes and heart disease, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref4">4</xref>] . Recently, another concern with fried food is acrylamide, a food born chemical that forms naturally when cooked at high temperatures, believed to be metabolized to glycidamide and is a potential mutagen and as well as a reproductive toxicant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref5">5</xref>] . At the beginning of the millennium in April 2002, the Swedish National Food Authority and the Stockholm University have first reported acrylamides formation in fried foods particularly in carbohydrate-rich products during processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref6">6</xref>] . Many agencies like The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1994), The U.S. National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) and The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have reported acrylamide as “probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref7">7</xref>] , “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref8">8</xref>] and “likely to be carcinogenic to humans” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref9">9</xref>] , respectively; while The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have warned that the unintentional contaminant acrylamide in certain foods might be of public health concern since it has been shown to cause cancer in animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref10">10</xref>] . Acrylamide(C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>5</sub>NO; 2-propenamide), is a colorless, non-volatile crystalline solid, soluble in water and has molecular weight of 71.08 kDa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref12">12</xref>] is formed in food at high temperature through Millard Reaction, where reducing sugar such as glucose, fructose and asparagine, an amino acid; are believed to be the major precursors. A salient reaction pathway has been proposed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref15">15</xref>] . In absence of asparagine, acrolein and acrylic acid, that are produced by degradation of lipids (triglycerides) due to high temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref17">17</xref>] , and ammonia play the same role in lipid-rich foods to form acrylamide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Among different validated analytical methods, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are found to be prominent for the estimation of acrylamides in various foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref21">21</xref>] . Elimination of potential matrix interferences by Solid phase extraction (SPE) cleanup step; reduction of ion suppression by APCI mode and no requirements of derivatization have given major advantage in LC-MS/MS over GC-MS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref22">22</xref>] . Moreover, studies conducted by different countries like Sweden, China, Hong Kong, Austria and Turkey [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref27">27</xref>] in surveying</p><p>acrylamide content in various food products. However, no such study has ever been conducted in any food products in Bangladesh. Therefore, regarding the above circumstance the objective of the study was to develop a validated LC-MS/MS method for the determination of acrylamide in potato chips and other locally available foods.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Standards and Chemical</title><p>Reference standard of Acrylamide (purity of 99.9%) and isotope labelled internal standard (IS) of Acrylamide d3 were purchased from Scharlu and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. Methanol (MS Grade, purity of 99.9%), Acetonitrile (MS Grade, purity of 99.9%), Hexane (HPLC grade, purity of 97.09%) and Sodium Chloride (reagent grade, purity of 99.5%) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. Formic acid (purity of 98%) analytical grade was purchased from BDH England, Magnesium Sulphate (purity of 99%) purchased from Merck, Primary secondary amine (PSA) procured from Agilent Technologies and highest purity demineralized water was used unless mentioned otherwise.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. General Equipment</title><p>Metler Toledo analytical AL204 balance used from (China), Hwashin sonicator bath power sonic 505 and Vortex mixer 250VM (Korea), Hermle labortechnik GmbH Centrifuge Z206A (Germany), Bibby Scientific Block heater SBH130D/3 (UK), Whatman syringe filter 0.22 &#181;m (UK) were used.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. LC-MS/MS System</title><p>A quaternary liquid chromatographic system (Nexera X2 series) with a triple quadruple mass spectrometer-mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray interface and lab solution software (LCMS-8050, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) were used in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. LC Condition</title><p>For acrylamide analysis Phenomenex C-18 (100 &#215; 2.0 mm, 2.5 &#181;m) column was used which maintained at 40˚C; mobile phase was mixture of two solution with gradient elution mode: B%: 1% (0 to 4.4 min)-80% (4.5 to 5.4 min)-1% (5.5 to 10 min) and delivered at flow rate of 0.2 mL/minutes; chromatographic injection volume was 10 &#181;L and the retention time of acrylamide was about 1.8 minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. MS Conditions</title><p>The MS acquisition parameters were as follows: Run time: 10 minutes; Ion polarity: positive ion mode; ion source: atmospheric pressure electrospray ionisation; Capillary voltage (kV): 4.0; Block temperature: 400˚C; Dessolvation line temperature: 200˚C; CID gas: Argon (270 kPa), Nebulizing gas flow: N2, 1.5 L/min; Drying gas flow: N2, 10.0 L/min; Heating gas flow: 10 L/min; Interface temperature: 300˚C; mass spectrum scan range (m/z): 10 - 200 Da where protonated precursor ions of acrylamide and acrylamide-d<sub>3</sub> (IS) was m/z 72.1 and m/z 75.1 respectively. Two multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) transitions of acrylamide and acrylamide-d<sub>3</sub> were selected using a dwell time of 100 milli second as quantifier and confirmation ions as shown in below <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Preparation of Mobile Phase</title><p>Water and 0.1% formic acid in methanol were used as mobile phase. Both the solutions were degassed by sonication using ultra sonic bath and filtered through 0.22 &#181;m filter membrane using the Millipore filtration unit.</p><sec id="s2_6_1"><title>2.6.1. Preparation of Stock Solution</title><p>1000 mg/L of acrylamide standard and 1.0 mg/L of IS stock solution were prepared standard in water. Both the solutions were sonicated for 10 minutes and stored at 2˚C - 8˚C for further preparation of calibration solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6_2"><title>2.6.2. Preparation of Intermediate Stock Solution</title><p>Intermediated stock solution of 10 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L of acrylamide and IS respectively were prepared by appropriate dilution of stock solutions with water.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) Transition of Acrylamide and IS</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >MRM (m/z)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >CID Voltage (V)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Q1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Q3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Acrylamide-d<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.1 &gt; 58.0*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.1 &gt; 30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Acrylamide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.1 &gt; 55.0*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.1 &gt; 27.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−30</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*MRM transition as quantifier.</p><p>These were also undergone sonication for 10 minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6_3"><title>2.6.3. Preparation of Working Solution</title><p>1000 &#181;g/L, 800 &#181;g/L, 500 &#181;g/L, 200 &#181;g/L, 100 &#181;g/L, 20 &#181;g/L &amp; 10 &#181;g/L of acrylamide and 100 &#181;g/L of IS standard were prepared by appropriate dilution of intermediated stock solutions. Prepared IS standard solution was added to each acrylamide standards in 50:50 ratio to prepare 500 &#181;g/L, 400 &#181;g/L, 250 &#181;g/L, 100 &#181;g/L, 50 &#181;g/L, 10 &#181;g/L and 5 &#181;g/L acrylamide calibration solutions where 50 &#181;g/L of IS was present in each of those. All the calibration standards were sonicated for 10 minutes in ultrasonic bath and then injected into LC-MS/MS for analysis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Sample Preparation</title><p>A modified QuEChERS procedure was adopted in acrylamide extraction. Accurately weighed 2 grams of crushed powder sample were weighed accurately and taken into a 50 mL centrifuge tube in which 5 mL hexane, 10 mL water and 10 mL acetonitrile were introduced. Vigorously vortexed and shook for 2 minutes. The purpose of hexane was to defat the samples and to remove oils &amp; non-polar components. Then Q-sep Q 100 Packet extraction salt (containing 4 g MgSO<sub>4</sub> and 0.5 g NaCl) and additional 4 g of MgSO<sub>4</sub> was added to absorb the water completely. Vortexed and shook again for another 5 minutes. 2 mL extract from the bottom layer was transferred into another 20 mL centrifuge tube were 100 mg primary secondary amine (PSA) was added to remove organic acids. Vortexed for 1 minute and then centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 10 minutes. 1 mL aliquot was collected and evaporated to dryness under N2 stream. The dried sample was reconstituted with 1 ml of water and filtrated through 0.22 &#181;m syringe filter. Then prepared sample solution and 100 ppb of IS was mixed in 50:50 ratio in a vial. This reconstituted solution and 100 &#181;g/L IS mixed in 50:50 ratio was injected into LC-MS/MS for the determination of acrylamide in the sample.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Method Validation</title><p>The validation of LC-MS/MS method is performed using blank sample of potato chips as per guidelines of International Conference on Harmonization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref28">28</xref>] with various parameters such as Specificity, Linearity, Precision, Accuracy, LOD, LOQ and Robustness.</p><sec id="s2_8_1"><title>2.8.1. Specificity or Selectivity</title><p>Selectivity of this method was demonstrated by making 5 &#181;g/L and 250 &#181;g/L acrylamide standard with acetonitrile instead of water and then analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The % RSD of retention time and area from six repeated injections at each concentration was calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8_2"><title>2.8.2. Linearity</title><p>Linearity was carried out at seven concentration levels ranging from 5 to 500 &#181;g/L. A calibration curve was obtained by plotting the peak area vs. concentration. The % RSD from three repeated injections at each concentration and % y-intercept bias was calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8_3"><title>2.8.3. Accuracy</title><p>The accuracy of the method was evaluated at three concentration levels of acrylamide (250, 400 and 500 &#181;g/L) by spiking into samples. The % recoveries reflect an average of six analyses at each concentration and % RSD was reported.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8_4"><title>2.8.4. Precision</title><p>Precision was measured as intra-day precision (repeatability) and inter-day precision (reproducibility) of working standard. The intra-day and inter-day precision of the method was demonstrated by injection (in six analyses) of the standard on two consecutive days and % of RSD was calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8_5"><title>2.8.5. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)</title><p>The LOD and LOQ of the method were estimated on the basis of signal-to-noise ratio 3:1 and 10:1, respectively by injection series of diluted solution of known concentration. The % RSD from the six repeated injections was calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8_6"><title>2.8.6. Robustness</title><p>Robustness was studied at seven different concentration of acrylamide with change in some parameters such as column temperature, column type, injection volume and analyst. Percentage (%) RSD from six repeated injections at each concentration under change condition was calculated.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Quantification of Acrylamide in Different Types of Foods</title><p>Besides method validation, 24 types of food total 265 items of different batches represent the whole population, manufactured by different companies without revealing their names were collected in mid April 2017 from the local market randomly and prepared according to section 2.6 for quantification of acrylamide.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results &amp; Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Method Development and Optimization</title><p>Chromatographic conditions like mobile phase composition, injection volume, flow rate and column oven temperature were optimized for better quantification of acrylamide in complex food matrix. Acrylamide exhibits both weakly acidic and basic properties. However, solubility varies considerably in polar and unipolar solvents whereas acrylamide is extremely high soluble in water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref30">30</xref>] and became fully protonated in the mobile phase. Method development under gradient conditions with different proportions of organic modifier was tried with change of flow rates for good separation of acrylamide. Finally, the mentioned composition of mobile phase and elution mode at flow rate 0.2 mL/min was found satisfactory. The optimized 10 μL injection volume, Phenomenex C-18 column and 40˚C column oven temperature returned the best result in separation of matrix with very little interferences and elution at about 1.8 minutes.</p><p>Atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization used as ion source for the determination of acrylamide, gave high intensity and good linearity of calibration curve. The parent and product ions were first optimized by injecting a 500 &#181;g/L standard solution of acrylamide in both positive and negative polarity mode. Due to protonation and use of formic acid in mobile phase, the intensity was much higher in positive mode. Quantification of acrylamide was performed by using optimized MRM mode for consistent and adequate response where most abundant product ions m/z 55.0 and m/z 27.1 for the case of acrylamide precursor ion m/z 72.1 were observed by employing 16 eV and 22 eV collision energy, respectively. On the other side product ions at m/z 58.0 and m/z 30.1 was observed in the case of acrylamide-d<sub>3</sub> (IS) precursor m/z 75.1 by applying 15 eV and 24 eV collision energy, respectively. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> represent the total ion chromatogram and mass spectra of product inos for acrylamide and acrylamide-d<sub>3</sub> (IS), respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Method Performance Characteristics/Validation</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Linearity</title><p>A seven-point calibration curve was constructed by plotting triplicate injected acrylamide concentration versus area over the range of 5 to 500 &#181;g/L with a mean correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) was 0.9997. The % RSD values of the repeated injection are &lt;2% within each concentration and the Y-intercept bias is less than 2% which explains excellent linearity of the curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Precision</title><p>The precision was evaluated as the repeatability by calculating the percent relative</p><p>standard deviation (% RSD) for six determinations each for seven different solutions which were analyzed by three different analysts on the same day (Intra-day) and on the three different days (Inter-Day) as well (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Since the % RSD value is within the acceptable norms (&lt;5) obtained for Intra-day and Inter-day at seven different concentrations, it can be said that the proposed method can be implemented for analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Accuracy</title><p>The accuracy of the method was assessed by spiking different known concentration of acrylamide standard solution into sample. Standard solution of 250 &#181;g/L, 400 &#181;g/L and 500 &#181;g/L was spiked into previously analyzed sample contained 7.05 &#181;g/L acrylamide. The calculated and observed concentration of acrylamide was compared and recoveries of each spiked levels were determined (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). It was found that the recoveries and % RSD for different spiked concentration laid</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Precision studies for acrylamide determination</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Standard Conc. (&#181;g/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Intra-day precision</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Inter-day precision</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean observed conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% RSD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean observed conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean observed conc. (&#181;g/L) (3 days)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% RSD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean % RSD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.804</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.871</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.977</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.716</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >10.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >9.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.169</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.730</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.779</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >50.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >49.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.287</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.643</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.984</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >98.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >99.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.248</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.587</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.142</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >250</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >247.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.28</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >248.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >247.42</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.368</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.25</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.521</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.833</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >395.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >393.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >393.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.522</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >394.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.890</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >496.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >486.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >480.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.532</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.338</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analyst-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >473.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.338</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Accuracy studies for acrylamide determination</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Acrylamide standard Conc.(&#181;g/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Observed Conc. of Acrylamide standard (&#181;g/L) (n = 3)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Analyte Conc. in sample (&#181;g/L)(n = 6)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total Conc. (Analyte Conc. in sample + Acrylamide standard Conc.) (&#181;g/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Observed Conc. in sample after spiking (&#181;g/L) (n = 6)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Recovery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% RSD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >7.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >272.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >398.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >410.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >489.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >496.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >511.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>between the range of 96% - 105% and 0.8 - 1.1, respectively; which is within the acceptable norms signifying the accuracy of the method.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. Selectivity</title><p>Selectivity of this method was demonstrated in the presence of acetonitrile instead of water. Six repeated injections of 5 &#181;g/L and 250 &#181;g/L of acrylamide standard prepared in acetonitrile along with 50 &#181;g/L IS were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. A slight change at elution time (1.7 minutes) of acrylamide was observed with % RSD of only 0.17 to 0.23, which demonstrates that the method is selective and interferences free (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_5"><title>3.2.5. LOD &amp; LOQ</title><p>LOD (Limit of Detection) is the lowest detectable but not quantifiable target analyte concentration and LOQ (Limit of Quantitation) is the lowest quantifiable concentration of target analyte with acceptable precision; was determined by considering signal to noise ratio (S/N) of the strongest mass transition with respect to background noise obtained from the blank (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3:1 was taken for LOD whereas it was 6:1 for LOQ. Based on this ratio, the LOD and LOQ for acrylamide were obtained as 2.0 &#181;g/L and 4.0 &#181;g/L respectively with %RSD less than 5 for six replicates.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_6"><title>3.2.6. Robustness</title><p>By analyzing seven different concentration of acrylamide with change in some parameters such as column temperature, column type, injection volume and different analyst; the robustness of method was determined (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Robustness studies for acrylamide determination under changed conditions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Acrylamide standard concentration (&#181;g/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Developed method</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Change in operational method</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Column (Shim-pack XR-ODS II, C18, 2.0 mm &#215; 100 mm, 2.2 &#181;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Column temparature (35˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Injection volume (10 &#181;l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Analyst II</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Conc. (&#181;g/L) (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RSD %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >496.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >480.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >497.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >497.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >497.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>acrylamide content obtained by the developed method and that obtained under the mentioned change conditions, remained almost the same with % RSD less than 4.0 in every case.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Quantification of Acrylamide in Other Foods</title><p>The developed validate method of acrylamide quantification in potato chips by LC-MS/MS was also applied to analyze in other 265 food items like french fry, beef tikka, peyaju, chicken grill, flour chips, potato Biscuits, chanachur, cheese, puffs, coffee candy, chicken fry, puri, shik kabab, fuska, bread, brinjal fry, nut without shell, nut with shell, chicken nuggets etc. as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> and the frequency distribution of acrylamide content in foods is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. 77% of the analyzed samples have returned positive levels of acrylamide ranging</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The acrylamide contents in foods using LC/MS/MS methods</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Number of Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples positive</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Level of Acrylamide (&#181;g/L)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potato chips</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >French fry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beef tikka</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peyaju</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chicken grill</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flour chips</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potato Biscuits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chanachur</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cheese puffs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coffee candy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chicken fry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Puri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shik kabab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fuska</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bread</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brinjal fry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nut without shell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nut with shell</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chicken nuggets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish fry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egg fry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boiled egg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cake</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biscuit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.80</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>from 19.33 to 197.04 μg/L, among which 54% were found to be more than 100 μg/L. Average acrylamide content in Chanachur was found to be lowest (19.33 μg/L) while in processed and cooked food like potato chips, french fries, Beef tikka, Peyaju, Chicken grill, Flour chips, Chicken fry, Shik kabab, fuska, Fish fry, Egg fry, Brinjal it was highest with average values of 20.43 - 197.04 μg/kg.</p><p>Acrylamide contents in baked products except for biscuit and other food items like cheese puffs, coffee candy, nut without shell, nut with shell, chicken nuggets and boiled egg were found to be below the detection limit. Levels of acrylamide in protein-rich food (79.76 - 89.14 &#181;g/L) were higher than that of baked food products (35.23 - 51.17 &#181;g/kg) indicating the occurrence of the acrylamide contamination due to cooking procedures.</p><p>Previous research also supports the above statement, that acrylamide may be</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Ranges of acrylamide in various food products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref32">32</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Acrylamide Range (&#181;g∙Kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potato chips</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117 - 2762</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >French Fries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 1352</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Breads &amp; bakery products</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 364</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chocolate products</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 909</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nuts &amp; nut butters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 - 457</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein foods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 116</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Canned fruit &amp; vegetables</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>formed due to the differences in cooking and processing parameters, methods, type and quality of raw materials, as well as formulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref31">31</xref>] . The quantification of acrylamide investigated for the very first time in Dhaka, Bangladesh in different food was found to be within range and also reported by United States Food and Drug Administration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>Though there is a declaration regarding daily allowable limit of acrylamide uptake (0.3 - 0.8 &#181;g/kg body weight) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94055-ref33">33</xref>] , the allowable limit of acrylamide formation in food is yet to be set. It is high time to investigate current food processing practices or to develop new food processing techniques so that the acrylamide formation in food products can be minimized for the sake of public health especially for our future generations.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The developed LC-MS/MS method for the determination of acrylamide is simple, rapid, sensitive accurate and precise and can be applicable for routine analysis. The method is mainly applicable for starch-based products but can also be adopted for other sample matrices as well. Participation in Proficiency Testing might help to get a clear view about the applicability of this method. Besides, the highest acrylamide levels were found in fried products, such as potato chips, french fries, chicken grill and sheikh kabab, which indicated the general risk on public health due to toxicity of acrylamide from foods. This investigation supplied important information on acrylamide in food for public health experts, food policy makers and consumers. Further research is suggested to find out the correlation among temperature, sugar and asparagine, and also to minimize the acrylamide formation during the processing of food.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are great full to all employee of Designated Reference Institute for Chemical Measurements (DRiCM) for their cordial help during analysis. Additionally, M. Bruno, Mohammad Mizanur Rahman and Abdullah-al-Mamun are acknowledged for reviewing the paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>All of the authors are employees of Designated Reference Institute for Chemical Measurements. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Khan, M., Moniruzzaman, Md. and Razu, M.H. (2019) Method Development and Validation for the Quantification of Acrylamide in Potato Chips and Other Locally Available Food by LC-MS/MS in Bangladesh. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 10, 876-892. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2019.107063</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94055-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Harris, R.S. (2014) General Discussion on the Stability of Nutrients. In: Karmas, E. and Harris, R.S., Eds., Nutritional Evaluation of Food Processing, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7030-7_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikanone, C.E.O. and Oyekan, P.O. (2014) Effect of Boiling and Frying on the Total Carbohydrate, Vitamin C and Mineral Contents of Irish (Solanun tuberosum) and Sweet (Ipomea batatas) Potato Tubers. Nigerian Food Journal, 32, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30115-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henry, C.J.K. (1998) Impact of Fried Foods on Macronutrient Intake, with Special Reference to Fat and Protein. Grasas y Aceites, 49, 336-339. https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.1998.v49.i3-4.736</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahill, L.E., Pan, A., Chiuve, S.E., Sun, Q., Willett, W.C., Hu, F.B. and Rimm, E.B. (2014) Fried-Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Study in 2 Cohorts of Men and US Women. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100, 667-675. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.084129</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barber, D.S., Hunt, J.R., Ehrich, M.F., Lehning, E.J. and Lo Pachin, R.M. (2011) Metabolism, Toxicokinetics and Hemoglobin Adduct Formation in Rats Following Subacute and Subchronic Acrylamide Dosing. Neurotoxicology, 22, 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-813X(01)00024-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tareke, E., Rydberg, P., Karlsson, P., Erickson, S. and Tornqvist, M. (2001) Analysis of Acrylamide, a Carcinogen Formed in Heated Foodstuffs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 4998-5006. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020302f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) (1994) Acrylamide in “IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans”. Volume 60 Some Industrial Chemicals, Lyon, 389-433.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NTP (2011) Report on Carcinogens. 12th Edition, U.S. National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EPA (2011) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): Acrylamide (CASRN 79-06 1). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC. http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0286.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization (2005) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (Summary and Conclusions) Sixty-Fourth Meeting. Rome, 1-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashoor, S.H. and Zent, J.B. (1984) Maillard Browning of Common Amino Acids and Sugars. Journal of Food Science, 49, 1206-1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb10432.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eriksson, S. (2005) Acrylamide in Food Products: Identification, Formation and Analytical Methodology. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Environmental Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zyzak, D.V., Sanders, R.A., Stojanovic, M., Tallmadge, D.H., Eberhart, B.L., Ewald, D.K., Gruber, D.C., Morsch, T.R., Strothers, M.A., Rizzi, G.P. and Villagran, M.D. (2003) Acrylamide Formation Mechanism in Heated Foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 4782-4787. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034180i</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amrein, T.M., Bachmann, S., Noti, A., Biedermann, M., Barbosa, M.F., Biedermann-Brem, S., Grob, K., Keiser, A., Realini, P., Escher, F. and Amado, R. (2003) Potential of Acrylamide Formation, Sugars, and Free Asparagine in Potatoes: A Comparison of Cultivars and Farming Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 5556-5560. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034344v</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yaylayan, V. and Stadler, R.H. (2005) Acrylamide Formation in Food: A Mechanistic Perspective. Journal of AOAC International, 88, 262-267.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umano, K. and Shibamoto, T. (1987) Analysis of Acrolein from Heated Cooking Oils and Beef Fat. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 35, 909-912. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00078a014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gertz, C. and Klostermann, S. (2002) Analysis of Acrylamide and Mechanisms of Its Formation in Deep-Fried Foods. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 104, 762-771. https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-9312(200211)104:11&lt;762::AID-EJLT762&gt;3.0.CO;2-R</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Becalski, A., Lau, B.P.Y., Lewis, D., Seaman, S.W., Hayward, S., et al. (2004) Acrylamide in French Fries: Influence of Free Amino Acids and Sugars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 3801-3806. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0349376</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasuhara, A., Tanaka, Y., Hengel, M. and Shibamoto, T. (2003) Gas Chromatographic Investigation of Acrylamide Formation in Browning Model Systems. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 51, 3999-4003. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0300947</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ono, H., Chuda, Y., Ohnishi-Kameyama, M., Yada, H., Ishizaka, M., Kobayashi, H. and Yoshida, M. (2003) Analysis of Acrylamide by LC/MS/MS and GC/MS in Processed Japanese Foods. Food Additives &amp; Contaminants, 20, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0265203021000060887</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrzejewski, D., Roach, J.A.G., Gay, M.L. and Musser, S.M. (2004) Analysis of Coffee for the Presence of Acrylamide by LC/MS/MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 1996-2002. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0349634</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pittet, A., Perisset, A. and Oberson, J.M. (2004) Trace Level Determination of Acrylamide in Cereal-Based Foods by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1035, 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Svensoon, K., Abramsson, L., Becker, W. and Glynn, A. (2003) Dietary Intake of Acrylamide in Sweden. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 41, 1581-1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00188-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, W.C., Hsiao, S.W., Chou, S.S., Sun-Hwang, L., Lu, T.J. and Yeh, A.I. (2006) Determination of Acrylamide in Chinese Foods by GC-Ion Trap MS Using 2-Bromopropenamide and 2-Bromopropenamide-13C3. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 14, 207-214.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leung, K.S., Lin, A., Tsang, C.K. and Yeung, S.T.K. (2003) Acrylamide in Asian Foods in Hong Kong. Food Additives &amp; Contaminants, 20, 1105-1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030310001620414</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murkovic, M. (2004) Acrylamide in Austrian Foods. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, 61, 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2004.02.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senyuva, H.Z. and G&amp;#246;kmen, V. (2005) Survey of Acrylamide in Turkish Foods by an In-House Validated LC-MS Method. Food Additives &amp; Contaminants, 22, 204-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030512331344178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guidelines on Validation of Analytical Procedure: Methodology Q2R1 (2005) International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Commission of the European Communities, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Cyanamid Co. (1969) Chemistry of Acrylamide, Bulletin PRC 109. Process Chemicals Department, American Cyanamid Co., Wayne, 1-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Habermann, C.E. (1991) Acrylamide. In: Kroschwitz, J.J., Howe-Grant, M. and Kirk Othmer, E., Eds., Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition, Vol. 1, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 251-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olmez, H., Tuncay, F., Ozcan, N. and Demirel, S. (2008) A Survey of Acrylamide Levels in Foods from the Turkish Market. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 21, 564-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2008.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition [FDA/CFSAN] (2002) Exploratory Date on Acrylamide in Foods. United States Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94055-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) FAO/WHO Consultations on the Health Implications of Acrylamide in Foods. Summary Report of a Meeting Held in Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>