<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2019.97050</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-94015</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Prevalence of Some Deteriorating Microorganisms in Some Varieties of Cheese
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ayah</surname><given-names>B. Abdel-Salam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Neveen</surname><given-names>S. M. Soliman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Food Hygiene and Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>620</fpage><lpage>630</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <b>Aim:</b>
  <b> </b>
  This work throw
  s
   light on the deteriorating microorganisms in some varieties of cheeses 
  [
  hard cheese 
  (
  Ras cheese
  )
  , and processed cheese
  ]
  . <b>Material and Method: </b>Thirty Ras cheese and processed cheese samples were collected randomly and subjected to chemical &amp; microbiological examination to determine its contamination with deteriorating microorganisms. <b>Results: </b>Chemical examination showed that the mean titratable acidity % of Ras and Processed cheese samples w
  ere
   0.5
   
  &#177; 0.073 and 0.93
  %
   &#177; 0.062%, respectively, while salt % w
  ere
   3.4 &#177; 0.078 and 1.03
  %
   &#177; 0.05%, respectively. Most of samples were contaminated with high numbers of Coliforms, yeast, mold, proteolytic, lipolytic and Enterococci. <b>Conclusion: </b>There are poor hygienic measures during production, processing and handling of cheese.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Titratable Acidity</kwd><kwd> Salt</kwd><kwd> Proteolytic Microorganisms</kwd><kwd> Coliforms</kwd><kwd> Enterococci</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dairy food spoilage varies according to food type, microbial type and numbers that cause changes in color, odor and texture with sliminess, gas and liquid accumulation, microorganisms must multiply and reach “spoilage detection level”. According to the nature of spoilage and types of microbes, the spoilage detection level can range from 10<sup>6</sup> - 10<sup>8</sup> cells/g or /ml.</p><p>Spoilage microorganisms include psychrotrophic bacteria, yeast, mold, hetero fermentative lactobacilli, and spore-forming bacteria. Psychrotrophic bacteria produce extracellular hydrolytic enzymes, and contamination of pasteurized products with these bacteria affect their shelf life. Fungal spoilage of dairy foods is manifested by the presence of a wide variety of metabolic by-products, causing off-flavors, and changes in color or texture. Coliforms, yeast, hetero fermentative lactic acid bacteria and spore-forming bacteria cause gas defects in cheese. There are a wide variety of spoilage microorganisms in dairy foods due to practices used in production, formulation, processing, packaging, storage, distribution, and handling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Fermentation of lactose lower pH acts as a preservative and allows desirable microflora to restrict undesirable microorganisms growth; adding salt to reduce the water activity (aw); packaging with less oxygen and freezing slow spoilage rate of dairy foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>This work was planned to throw light on the deteriorating microorganisms in some varieties of cheeses [hard cheese (Ras cheese), processed cheese].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Collection</title><p>Thirty each of hard cheese (Ras), and processed cheese was randomly collected as sold to consumers from dairy shops in Cairo and Giza governorates.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Chemical Examination</title><p>Titratable acidity percentage was measured according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref2">2</xref>] and NaCl content according to Volhard method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref3">3</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Microbiological Examination</title><p>Preparation of decimal dilutions for the collected samples, Total coliform count with Completed test for E. coli, Total proteolytic count, Lipolytic microorganisms count, Enterococci count, Total Yeast and Total Mold count were examined according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref3">3</xref>] with bio chemical identification of the isolated Coliforms &amp; Enterococci species were examined according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref4">4</xref>] . While yeast species were examined according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref5">5</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Chemical Examination</title><p>Titratable acidity percentage: Increase of titratable acidity is a monitor of freshness and the bacterial activity in milk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref6">6</xref>] . While lower pH of milk to less than 4.6 protects the fermented dairy products from contamination with pathogens and considers safe hygienically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref8">8</xref>] . Data recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> showed that the mean titratable acidity percentage of the examined Ras and Processed cheese samples were 0.5 &#177; 0.073 and 0.93% &#177; 0.062%, respectively. Nearly similar</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analytical results of titratable acidity % &amp; salt % in the examined samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total No. of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; S.E.M.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Titratable acidity percentages</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.073</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93 &#177; 0.062</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Salt percentages</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#177; 0.078</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03 &#177; 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>findings of Ras cheese were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] . Higher results of processed cheese were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref10">10</xref>] . Whereas, lower findings of Processed cheese were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Salt percentage: Salt added is an important step in most cheese varieties; it enhances flavor, draws the whey out of the curd and controls the undesirable microorganisms. The salt content of cheese ranges from about 0.5% to 0.7% (w/w) in acid curd varieties, such as cottage cheese to about 4% to 6% (w/w) in pickled cheeses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref13">13</xref>] . Regarding the salt percentage in examined cheese samples (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), it ranged from 2.8 - 4.7 and 0.51 - 1.4 with a mean value of 3.4 &#177; 0.078 and 1.03% &#177; 0.05% in the examined samples of Ras cheese and Processed cheese, respectively. Nearly similar results in processed cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] . While lower obtaining of Ras cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The variation of salt content in the examined cheese samples is due to the added salt depends on individual dairies, and there is no standard in addition of salt to cheese and the amount of salt relies on discretion of cheese maker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref12">12</xref>] . The high salt content in some examined samples can mask the poor bacteriological quality of the raw milk and prevent gas holes formation and off-flavor especially in summer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Microbiological Examination</title><p>Coliforms contents (MPN/g): Coliform count is an indicator of possible fecal contamination, microbial quality and reflects the hygienic conditions in the food processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref15">15</xref>] . Regarding the results represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, coliform could be detected in all of the examined samples of Ras cheese and Processed cheese, with mean values of 1.2 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup> &#177; 3.3 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> and 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> &#177; 6.5 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> MPN/g in Ras and Processed cheese, respectively.</p><p>Lower results of processed cheese were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] . Lower results</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analytical results of the microbiological parameters in the examined cheese samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total No. of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Positive samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Min.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Max.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean &#177; S.E.M.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Coliform count (MPN/g.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 &#215; 10<sup>11</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup> &#177; 3.3 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> &#177; 6.5 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total proteolytic count (cfu/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4 &#215; 10<sup>11</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup> &#177; 4.5 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> &#177; 2.8 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total lipolytic count (cfu/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 1.2 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> &#177; 5.4 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Enterococci count (cfu/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 7.2 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 2.7 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total yeast count (cfu/g.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> &#177; 5.6 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 1.8 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total mold count (cfu/g.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 6.2 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of Ras cheese were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] . The results revealed that all of the examined Ras cheese and processed cheese contain high numbers of coliform. Egyptian Standards recommend the count should be less than 10 cells/g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref15">15</xref>] , the obtained results makes these cheeses of bad quality and cause losses economically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Isolated coliforms: Biochemical identification of Coliform organisms in Ras cheese, results revealed that Enterobacter intermedius (37.1%) was the most frequent one followed by Citrobacter diversus (16.13%), Citrobacter freundii (12.9%) and Klebsiella oxytoca (11.29%), while E. coli could be detected only in one isolate. Enterobacter intermedius (21.43), E. coli (20%) &amp; Citrobacter freundii (20%) had the highest incidence, then Klebsiella oxytoca (12.86%), Citrobacter diversus (11.4%) and Erwinia chrysanthemi (7.14%) in the examined Processed cheese (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>E. coli was found in Ras cheese and processed cheese with percentages of 1.61 and 20%, respectively. E. coli is due to fecal contamination, indicates that other pathogens of fecal origin may be found [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref19">19</xref>] . Results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> illustrated the serological identification of the suspected isolates of E. coli by slide agglutination test. In Ras cheese, the suspected isolates were negative, while in processed cheese one strain out of 14 strains was positive and classified as E. coli O<sub>25</sub>. Escherichia coli is present in the gastrointestinal tract of man and dairy animals. Milk can be contaminated either directly through animal feces or indirectly through contaminated surrounding environment, workers, and equipments. Most strains of E. coli are harmless commensals; some causes human gastrointestinal disease with mild to severe symptoms that may be fatal in high-risk individuals. Moreover, E. coli was reported for cases of pyelonephritis cystitis, pyelitis, peritonitis and appendicitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Total yeast count: Yeast contamination is economically hazard as it causes</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Incidence of isolated coliforms from the examined samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Isolated Coliform</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ras cheese</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Processed cheese</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citrobacter diversus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Citrobacter freundii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E. coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Enterobacter aerogenes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Enterobacter cloaca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Enterobacter intermedius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erwinia chrysanthemi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Klebsiella oxytoca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. ozaenae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serratia fonticola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serratia rubidaea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Serological identification of suspected E. coli isolates by slide agglutination test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Slide agglutination test</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No. of suspected E. coli</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Type of sample</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serotype</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ve+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ras cheese</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Processed cheese</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>objectionable changes as yeasty flavor and frothy consistency. Some species of yeast cause public hazard as endocarditis, gastrointestinal disturbance, and sometimes, fatal systemic diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref22">22</xref>] . Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> revealed that contaminated yeast could be detected in 30 (100%) and 25 (83.3%) of Ras cheese and Processed cheese, respectively, with mean values of 4.9 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> &#177; 5.6 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> and 2.57 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 1.8 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> cfu/g, respectively. Nearly similar results of Ras cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] , while lower findings were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref23">23</xref>] . Lower results of Processed cheese were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref24">24</xref>] , while higher results were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] . According to the Egyptian standards the count of total viable yeast should not exceed 100 cfu/g in hard cheese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref25">25</xref>] , 100% of Ras cheese samples was disagreed with this standard. This high level may be due to poor hygienic measures during production or using raw materials of bad quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><p>Isolated yeast species: from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the obtained results of cheese proved that C. albicans; C. diddensiae; C. intermedia; C. mesenterica; C. parapsilosis; C. zeylanoides; Cryptococcus curvatus; Debaryomyces hansenii; Db. Accidentalis; Filobasidiumcapsuligenum; Gal. Geotrichum; Geo. fermentans; Kluyveromyces marxianus; Lachanceacidri; Leucosporidiumscottii; P. guilliermondii; Schizosaccharomyces pombe; S’ copsisvini and Zygoascushellenicus were isolated from the examined samples of Ras cheese with concern that Gal. geotrichum (16.98%) and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (15.09%) had the highest incidence among the isolated strains. On Processed cheese, C. albicans (13.34%) was the most frequent one then Schizosaccharomyces pombe (11.13%); C. catenulate (6.67%); Cryptococcus curvatus (6.67%); Kluyveromyces marxianus (6.67%) and Lipomyces lipofer (6.67%). High acidity, low moisture content, storage at low temperature, and high salt concentration enhance growth of yeast. These spoilage yeast cause gas production, discoloration, soften texture, and fruity, bitter or yeasty off flavors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref28">28</xref>] . Candida spp. are the most common fungal infection in immune compromised persons known as candidiasis, which caused by C. albicans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>Total mold count: Presence of mold cause economic losses because it is accompanied by visible spoilage discoloration, off flavor, and rejection of the product, and may be a source of mycotoxins result in outbreaks of human food poisoning and many diseases as cancer, leukemia, and kidney toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref32">32</xref>] . Regarding the data recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> mold was present in 33.3% and 56.67% of the examined Ras cheese and Processed cheese samples, respectively, The counts were ranged from 5 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> - 4 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> and 200 - 10<sup>7</sup> cfu/g, with mean values of 3.6 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> and 6.7 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> &#177; 6.2 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> cfu/g, respectively. Nearly similar</p><p>findings of Processed cheese were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] , while Lower results of Processed cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref24">24</xref>] . Nearly similar findings of Ras cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] . Higher obtaining of Ras cheese was recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref9">9</xref>] , while lower outcomes were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref23">23</xref>] . It was found that 33.3 and 56.67% of the examined Ras cheese and Processed cheese, respectively were highly contaminated with mold and disagree with the Egyptian standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref33">33</xref>] because of the warm weather and inadequate refrigeration, increased species diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref34">34</xref>] . The fungi contributed to poor cleaning and unhygienic measures during production and handling and post processing contamination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Total proteolytic count: Bacillus spp. can survive heat treatment of milk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref38">38</xref>] . They can produce thermo stable hydrolytic enzymes are produced by Bacillus spp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref40">40</xref>] . B. stearothermophilus, B. licheniformis, B. coagulans, B. cereus, B. subtilis and B. circulansare the most commonly isolated species. Moreover, Bacillus species such as B. cereus, B. licheniformis and B. subtilis can produce many types of toxins associated with food borne diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref42">42</xref>] . The proteolytic enzymes may cause undesirable changes in texture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref43">43</xref>] and in flavor (especially bitterness). According to the obtained results in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) it was cleared that proteolytic organisms were present in 30 (100%) and 18 (60%) of the examined Ras cheese and Processed cheese, with a mean count of 5.8 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup> &#177; 4.5 &#215; 10<sup>10</sup> and 6.3 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> &#177; 2.8 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> cfu/g, respectively. Lower results of Ras &amp; Processed cheese were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>Total lipolytic count: Psychrophilic bacteria like Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Alcaligenes and some spore-formers produce extracellular lipase enzyme</p><p>that is adsorbed on milk fat globules and concentrated in the manufactured cheese. These enzymes hydrolyze triglyceride fat constituents of short chain fatty acids, including butyric, caproic, caprylic, and capric acids resulting in unpleasant odors in milk and rancidity in cheese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref45">45</xref>] . Results detected in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> revealed that lipolytic organisms were present in Ras and Processed cheese samples in percentages of 100% and 40%, respectively, with a mean count of 3 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 1.2 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> and 16.8 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> &#177; 5.4 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> cfu/g, respectively. Lower results of Ras &amp; Processed cheese were obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>Total Enterococci count: Enterococci are useful indicator to the hygienic conditions during food manufacture. The presence of specific virulence factors in some strains of Enterococcus faecalis and to a lesser extent in strains of Enterococcus faecium makes them pathogenic to human [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref47">47</xref>] . Using contaminated water supply, equipment and unhygienic conditions during the production, handling, and milk processing are the causes for their presence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref50">50</xref>] . The given results recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> illustrated that Enterococci were isolated from all examined cheese samples with a mean value of 7.7 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 7.2 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> and 4.3 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> &#177; 2.7 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> cfu/g in the examined Ras and Processed cheese samples, respectively. Lower results of Ras cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] . Nearly similar findings of processed cheese were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref17">17</xref>] , whereas lower results were recorded by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref51">51</xref>] .</p><p>Isolated Enterococci: The biochemical identification of Enterococci isolates in the examined cheese samples showed that Ent. durans (22.42%), Ent. ratti (20.69%) and Ent. faecium (17.24%) had the highest incidence, then Ent. faecalis (13.79%), Ent. italicus (13.79%) and Ent. caccae (8.63%) in the examined Ras cheese samples. Ent. durans was the most frequent one in processed cheese samples, followed by Ent. caccae (16.22%), Ent. faecium (10.81%), Ent. ratti (10.81%) and Ent. italicus (8.1%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>Some enterococci of dairy origin have been recorded to the production of bacteriocins (enterocins) which has inhibitory effect to some pathogenic bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella spp.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref52">52</xref>] . Some studies have reported that E. faecium and E. faecalis may be a potential recipient of vancomycin resistance genes, so, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref49">49</xref>] has recommended that E. faecium should not be considered as probiotics for human use. Also, Enterococci are pathogens causing endocarditis, bacteraemia, and urinary tract infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.94015-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Abdel-Salam, A.B. and Soliman, N.S.M. (2019) Prevalence of Some Deteriorating Microorganisms in Some Varieties of Cheese. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 9, 620-630. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2019.97050</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.94015-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sorhaug, T. and Stepaniak, L. (1997) Psychrotrophs and Their Enzymes in Milk and Dairy Products: Quality Aspects. Trends in Food Science &amp; Technology, 8, 35-41.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01006-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Association of Official Analytical Chemists “AOAC” (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th Edition, AOAC International, Rockville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Public Health Association “APHA” (2004) Standard Methods for Examination of Dairy Products. 17th Edition, American Public Health Association, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egyptian Standard (999-2/2005) A: Processed Cheese Specification, Egyptian Organization for Standardization (EOS) and Quality Control. Ministry of Industry, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tayseer, A.S., Mohamed, O.M., Nissreen, H.M. and Haifa, M.O. (2011) Chemical and Microbiological Evaluation of Processed Cheese Available in Khartoum Market, Sudan. American Journal of Food and Nutrition, 1, 28-33.  
https://doi.org/10.5251/ajfn.2011.1.1.28.33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nutting, G., Lomatt, S. and Barber, F. (2009) Estimation of Coliform Bacteria in Ice-Cream. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 7, 196-199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Kadamany, E., Toufeili, I., Khattar, M., Abou-Jawdeh, Y., Harakeh, S. and Haddad, T. (2001) Determination of Shelf Life of Concentrated Yoghurt (Labenah) Produced by In-Bag Straining of Set Yoghurt Using Hazard Analysis. Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 1023-1030. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74162-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Westall, S. and Filtenborg, O. (2010) Yeast Occurrence in Danish Feta Cheese. Journal of Food Microbiology, 15, 215-222.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hidalgo</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Candidiases</article-title><source> Internal Medicine Journal</source><volume> 88</volume>,<fpage> 52</fpage>-<lpage>58</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karakas, R. and Korukluoglu, M. (2006) A Traditional Cheese: Microbiological and Chemical Properties of Sepet Cheese. GIDA/The Journal of Food, 31, 169-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Svensson, B., Ekelund, K., Ogura, H. and Christiansson, A. (2004) Characterization of Bacillus cereus Isolated from Milk Silo Tanks at Eight Different Dairy Plants. International Dairy Journal, 14, 17-27.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(03)00152-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giraffa, G. (2003) Functionality of Enterococci in Dairy Products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 88, 215-222.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00183-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mennane, Z., Faid, M., Lagzouli, M., Ouhssine, M., Elyachioui, M., Berny, E., Ennouali, M. and Khedid, K. (2007) Physico-Chemical, Microbial and Sensory Characterization of Moroccan Klila. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 2, 93-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Committee on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) (1982) Microorganism in Food—Their Significance and Methods of Enumeration. 2nd Edition, Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Buffalo and London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turkoglu, H., Ceylan, Z. and Dayisoylu, K. (2003) The Microbiological and Chemical Quality of Orgu Cheese Produced in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 2, 95-97. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2003.92.94</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esraa, A.G. (2012) Microbiological Evaluation of Soft Cheeses Sold in Beni-Suef Markets. PhD Thesis, Beni Suef University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aya, B.A. (2014) Prevalence of Biological Hazards in Milk and Some Dairy Products in Egyptian Markets. PhD Thesis, Beni Suef University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussein, F.S., El Zubeir, I.M. and Fadlelmoula, A.A. (2011) Quality Evaluation of Imported and Locally Produced Processed Cheese in Sudan. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4, 231-235.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sert, D., Ayar, A. and Akin, N. (2007) The Effects of Starter Culture on Chemical Composition, Microbiological and Sensory Characteristics of Turkish Kasar Cheese during Ripening. Internet Journal of Food Safety, 9, 7-13.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0307.2007.00339.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nour El Dian, M.S.A. and El Zubeir, I.E.M. (2010) Chemical Composition of Processed Cheese Using Sudanese White Cheese. Research Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 5, 31-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Desmarchelier, P. and Fegan, N. (2011) Pathogens in Milk Escherichia coli. In: Fuquay, J.W., Ed., Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 60-66.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374407-4.00393-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jane, M.B. (2010) Microbiological, Physico-Chemical and Sensory Quality Aspects of Dairy Desserts Manufactured from Cottage Cheese. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekram, E.B. and Ibtisam, E.M. (2011) Chemical Composition and Microbial Load of Set Yoghurt from Fresh and Recombined Milk Powder in Khartoum State, Sudan. International Journal of Dairy Science, 6, 172-180.  
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijds.2011.172.180</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salwa, A., Farag, D. and Galal, E. (2012) Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Quality and Safety of Egyptian Kariesh Cheese. The Journal of American Science, 8, 761-766.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ercan, D., Korel, F., Yüceer, Y. and Kinik, O. (2011) Physicochemical, Textural, Volatile, and Sensory Profiles of Traditional Sepetcheese. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 4300-4312. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3941</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vanderzant, C. and Splittstoesser, D. (2005) Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 3rd Edition, APHA Technical Committee on Microbiological Methods for Foods.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varnam, V.H. and Sutherland, P. (2009) Milk and Milk Products Series. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, London, 200-223.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eman, A.H. (2012) Assessment of Hygienic Status of Raw Milk and Some Dairy Products. M.Sc. Thesis, Damanhour University, Damanhour.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warsama, L.M., Ibtisam, E.E. and El Owni, O.A. (2006) Composition and Hygienic Quality of Sudanese Soft Cheese in Khartoum North (Sudan). International Journal of Dairy Science, 1, 36-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, G.M. and Afify, S.I. (2007) Occurrence of Some Pathogenic Microorganisms in Kariesh Cheese and Their Public Health Significance. Beni-Suef Veterinary Med J, 142-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bullerman, L.B. (1980) Incidence of Mycotoxic Molds in Domestic and Imported Cheeses. Journal of Food Safety, 2, 47-58.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.1980.tb00390.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popescu, A. and Angel, E. (2009) Analysis of Milk Quality and Its Importance for Milk Processors. Lucrari Stiintifice Zootehnie SiBiotehnologii, 42, 501-503.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Egyptian Standard (1007-1/2005) B: Hard Cheese Specification, Egyptian Organization for Standardization (EOS) and Quality Control. Ministry of Industry, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montagna, M., Erroi, R., Sanapo, S., Caggiano, G., Bagordo, F. and de Donno, A. (1998) Food Products and Fungal Contamination. Note I. Preliminary Investigation in Commercial Yoghurt. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 39, 68-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohamed, I.H. and Mahgoub, S.A. (2013) Microbiological Characterization of the Egyptian Soft White Cheese and Identification of Its Dominant Yeasts. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 7, 2205-2212.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2013.5368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ELbagory, A.M., Amal, M.E., Hammad, A.M. and Salwa, A.D. (2014) Prevalence of Fungi in Locally Produced Cheese and Molecular Characterization of Isolated Toxigenic Molds. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal, 27, 9-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kheir, S.E.O., El Owni, O.A.O. and Abdalla, M.O.M. (2011) Comparison of Quality of Sudanese White Cheese (Gibnabayda) Manufactured with Solanum dubium Fruit Extract and Rennet. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10, 106-111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonia, A. and Metwalli, A. (2011) Extended Shelf Life of Kariesh Cheese by Natural Preservatives. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 89, 639-649.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, L., Coolbear, T. and Daniel, R. (2003) Detection and Impact of Protease and Lipase Activities in Raw Milk and Milk Powders. International Dairy Journal, 13, 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00171-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, L., Coolbear, T. and Daniel, R. (2004) Characteristics of Proteinases and Lipases Produced by Seven Bacillus sp. Isolates from Milk Powder Production Lines. International Dairy Journal, 14, 495-504.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2003.10.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sperber, W.H. and Doyle, M.P. (2009) Compendium of the Microbiological Spoilage of Foods and Beverages, Food Microbiology and Food Safety. Springer Science-Business Media, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0826-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salih, &amp;#214;., Filiz, Y. and Cihat, O. (2010) Determination of Microbiological Characteristics of Turkish Karin Kaymagi Cheeses Packaged in Different Materials. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 4, 716-721.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dzwolak, W. and Ziajka, S. (1997) Zasady i wdrazanie HACCP w przemysle mleczarskim. Materialy szkoleniowe. ITM ART, Olsztyn.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karima, M.F. (2012) Detection of Food Safety Hazards in Milk and Some Dairy Products. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dogan, B. and Boor, K. (2003) Genetic Diversity and Spoilage Potentials among Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Fluid Milk Products and Dairy Processing Plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 130-138.  
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.1.130-138.2003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laukova, A. and Vlaemynck, G. (2003) Use of Bacterion Preparation with Antimicrobial Activity in Saint-Paulin Cheese. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 47, 497-505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cariolato, G., Andrighetto, C. and Lombardi, A. (2008) Occurrence of Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistances in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Collected from Dairy and Human Samples in North Italy. Food Control, 19, 886-892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.08.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO/WHO (2001) Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Còrdoba, 1-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giraffa, G. (2002) Enterococci from Foods. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 26, 163-171.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00608.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Donnelly, C.W. (2004) Growth and Survival of Microbial Pathogens in Cheese. In: Fox, P.F., et al., Eds., Cheese: Chemistry, Physics and Microbiology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 541-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-558X(04)80081-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metwally, B.N. (2006) Hygienic Quality of Soft Cheese Marketed in Cairo. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.94015-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumarsan, G., Annalvilli, R. and Sivakumar, K. (2007) Psychrotrophic Spoilage of Raw Milk at Different Temperatures of Storage. Journal of Applied Science Research, 3, 1383-1387.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>