GEPJournal of Geoscience and Environment Protection2327-4336Scientific Research Publishing10.4236/gep.2019.77006GEP-93850ArticlesEarth&Environmental Sciences Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Sediments from Ologe Lagoon, Agbara, Lagos, Nigeria MoyosoluwaOdunayo Adeyemi1JohnsonAdedeji Olusola2OghenemaroAkpobasah1NathanEyituoyo Adidi1RafiuOlaniyi Dada Shelle3Department of Geology, Crawford University, Igbesa, NigeriaDepartment of Geography and Planning Science (Environmental Management Option), Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, NigeriaNigerian Institute for Oceanography and Marine Research (NIOMR), Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria170720190707617319, April 201921, July 2019 24, July 2019© Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 2014This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This study was carried out to assess the level of heavy metals pollution in Ologe Lagoon, Agbara, Lagos, Nigeria. The Lagoon receives effluents from industries in the Agbara Industrial Estate. Cored Soft sediments were retrieved from six random sampling points within the Lagoon and labeled (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6). Subsamples of the sediments were prepared and analyzed for heavy metal concentration. The result from the heavy metal analysis of the sediments shows that average concentration of Mn, Zn, Cr, Ni, Cr, Ni, Co, Cu and Pb in the samples w as 278.1 ppm, 21.7 ppm, 14.2 ppm, 6.6 ppm, 6.4 ppm, 6.4 ppm and 4.4 ppm, respectively. The correlation between the heavy metals varies from 0.71 to 0.98 shows that they have a strongly positive degree of association which suggest s that they are from the same source. The geo-accumulation values for Cu in all stations ranged between (1 - 2.8 ppm) and it can be deduced that the sediments are moderately to strongly polluted. Pb varies between 1 and 2.1 suggesting that the sediments are moderately polluted. Zn exhibits strong pollution levels with a range from 2.5 and 3.5 ppm. Co is moderately polluted with 1.5 - 2.4 while Mn shows the highest level of pollution in all stations with Igeo values ranging between 4.1 and 5.8. This study showed that the Lagoon accumulates heavy metals as a result of anthropogenic activities evident in the dumping of municipal, sewage, industrial waste in the environment and domestic activities such as auto mobile transportation and mechanic repair workshop. Based on sediment quality guidelines, the Ologe Lagoon level of pollution ranged from Cu > Pb > Zn > Ni > Co > Mn > Cr > Al with Mn having the highest level of pollution.

Heavy Metals Wet Environments Geo-Accumulation Index Ologe Lagoon1. Introduction

The rapid growth of industrialization and population in Nigeria has brought about the problem of pollution in the natural environment. Heavy metals are naturally occurring elements with high atomic weight and a density about five times more than that of water (Duffus, 2002) . Heavy metals are toxic and their multiple industrial, domestic, agricultural, medical and technological applications have led to a geometric increase in the ecosystem, especially the wetlands which serve as sinks for pollutants (Ita & Anwana, 2017) . Heavy metals toxicity and distribution in wetlands can disrupt the ecosystem of the soil and that of the aquatic flora and fauna which depend on it and in turn pose a threat to human health (Loizidou et al., 1992) .

Metals such as copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Iron (Fe) and Manganese (Mn) are essential micronutrients required for plant and animal metabolism but can become toxic at high concentrations (Bryan, 1976) . Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg) have a negative effect on the ecosystem; they are highly toxic and rank among the priority metals that are of public health significance (Zheng et al., 2007; Duffus, 2002) . Naturally occurring heavy metals are found throughout the earth’s crust. They are released into the environment from the weathering of rocks. The average concentration of naturally occurring heavy metal in sediments can serve as the baseline level of heavy metal concentration (Smith, 1985; Alloway, 2012; Hariprasad & Dayananda, 2013) . Anthropogenic activities are considered the major sources of heavy metal pollution on the earth surface (Connell et al., 1999; Bosman & Kidd, 2009) . Environmental contamination and human exposure to toxic heavy metals are predominantly as a result of anthropogenic activities such as mining and smelting operations, industrialization, and the domestic and agricultural use of metallic compounds. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the level of heavy metal pollution using sediments from Ologe Lagoon, Lagos State, Nigeria.

2. Materials and MethodsStudy Area

Ologe Lagoon is a freshwater lagoon; it is amongst the four major lagoons in Lagos State, southwestern Nigeria together with Epe, Lekki and Lagos Lagoons. Ologe Lagoon had an area expanse of 9.4 km2 with coordinates between latitudes 6˚27'N and 6˚30'N; longitudes 3˚02'E and 3˚07'E (Figure 1). River Owo is the major source of fresh water and sediments into the lagoon before it discharges into the Atlantic Ocean through the Lagos Harbor and the Badagry Creek (Anetekhai et al., 2007; Kusemiju et al., 2001; Kumolu-Johnson et al., 2010) . The lagoon receives industrial waste and effluents from the Agbara Industrial Estate. The study area has a climate regime with a dominant wet season between March and November with an average rainfall of 154 m. The vegetation is of an equatorial rain forest and characterized by a fresh water mangrove swamp. The vegetation cover remains evergreen throughout the year and is mostly inaccessible.

Soil type is hydromorphic and they are seasonally or permanently water logged. The soil has dull colors, often brown, reddish-brown or dark grey at the surface. Station 1 was situated close to the contact between the Lagoon and the Agbara community. Anthropogenic activities going on in this area include; sand dredging, refuse dumping, and effluents discharge from the industries in Agbara.

3. Methodology3.1. Sample Collection and Preparation

Sampling and collection was carried out within Ologe Lagoon with the use of a boat as a means of transportation. Six sampling points (S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6) were picked within the lagoon and the coordinates were recorded using a Global Positioning System (GPS) Table 1. Bottom sediments from the lagoon were collected with the aid of a soft sediment Piston corer. The retrieved cores (40 cm) were divided at depth of 0 - 10 cm, 10 - 20 cm, 20 - 30 cm and 30 - 40 cm into samples into 4 samples labeled A, B, C and D, respectively. The samples retrieved from the cores were then stored in plastic containers which were adequately labeled and taken to the laboratory for sample preparation. The samples were dried in the open air for 2 weeks in the laboratory, after which they were pulverized using a mortar and pestle. Subsamples of 2 g were collected in well labeled air tight containers before being sent for elemental compositional analyses at Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Limited.

3.2. Geochemical Analysis

Heavy metals in the sediments were determined using Induced Coupled Plasma

Coordinates of the sampling stations in the study area
StationLatitudeLongitude
S16˚29'57.5"3˚6'10.3"
S26˚29'1.9"3˚5'45.3"
S36˚28'34.6"3˚5'32.4"
S46˚28'4.4"3˚5'35.3"
S56˚29'12.32"3˚6'38.7"
S66˚29'12.32"3˚6'38.7"

Emission Spectroscopy/Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-ES/MS). Subsamples with <75 µm fractions were used for the geochemical analysis. About 0.5 g of the pulp was weighed into the digestion flask and mixed with Aqua Regia (mixture of 0.5 ml H2O, 0.6 ml concentrated HNO3 and 1.8 ml concentrated HCl) for about two hours at a temperature of 80˚C to 95˚C. The mixture was cooled and then diluted to 10 ml of de-ionized water to homogenize the liquid. The digestion method using Aqua Regia has been confirmed to be able to leach out all adsorbed metals from sediment without necessarily attacking the silicate structure of the solids. It thus makes it possible to measure the quantity of metals present with greater accuracy and the metals are made easily available for bioaccumulation. This method has the ability to leach sulphides, some oxides and silicates, the mineral phases that are rarely attacked include barite, zircon, monazite, sphene, chromites, garnet, ilmenite, rutile and cassiterite (Scott et al., 1972) .

3.3. Data Analysis

The level of heavy metal contamination in the sediments was assessed with the use of the enrichment factor (EF), Contamination Factor (CF), Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo) as quantitative indices.

3.3.1. Enrichment Factor (EF)

This can be defined as the minimum factor by which the weight percent of elements in a body is greater than the average occurrence of that mineral in the earth’s crust (Sinex & Helz, 1981) . It can be used to compare and contrast different areas. Enrichment factor was used to determine the level of enrichment of Ologe Lagoons sediments. Quality of the sediments from the environment was determined by comparing the metal content in the sediments and the officially permitted levels such as (USEPA, 1999) . The formula is expressed as:

EF = Me / Al ( sample ) Me / Al ( background )

where; Me/Al(sample) represents the metal to Al ratio in the sample of interest and Me/Al(background) is the natural background value of metal to Al ratio. As we do not have metal background values for our study area, we used the values from World Average Shale. Aluminum was selected as the element of normalization because it’s predominant in natural sources of sediments (Tippie, 1984) and Average Shale Values proposed by (Mmolawa et al., 2011) were used as the background values. The classification used is presented in Table 2.

3.3.2 Contamination Factor (CF)

The assessment of the degree of heavy metal contamination in the sediments was carried out using the Contamination Factor (CF) which can be expressed as:

CF = C heavymetal C background

Hakanson (1980) categorized the contamination factor into 6 categories, CF < 1 is low contamination; 1 ≥ CF ≥ 3 is moderate contamination; 3 ≥ CF ≥ 6 is considerable contamination; CF ≥ 6 is very high contamination.

3.3.3. Geo-Accumulation Index (I<sub>geo</sub>)

Geo-accumulation Index as proposed by Muller (1969) was used to classify the degree of heavy metal contamination in the sediments (Table 3). The formula is expressed as:

I geo = log 2 ( C n sample 1.5 ∗ B n background )

Cn = Measured concentration of heavy metals in the soil samples.

Bn = Average shale value.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

The results obtained from geochemical analysis were subjected to statistical treatment. Both univariate and multivariate analysis were done using SPSS (Statistical program for the social scientists) and Microsoft excel.

Correlation and Component Analysis

The importance of Principal Component matrix is for data reduction and also to identify the source of the metals in the sediments, Table 4 showed 2 factors. The first component were sourced from both anthropogenic and geogenic origin due to the fact that certain elements which do not naturally occur in the environment are present alongside those that are naturally deposited, while series 2 shows only geogenic origin due to the fact that the element in this series mostly alkali earth metals which are gotten from calcareous fossil deposit.

Enrichment factor categories (Mmolawa et al., 2011)
Enrichment Factor (EF)Categories
EF < 2Deficiency to minimal enrichment
2 ≤ EF < 5Moderate enrichment
5 ≤ EF < 20Significant enrichment
20 ≤ EF < 40Very high enrichment
EF ≥ 40Extremely high enrichment
 Showing the classification of geo-accumulation index (Muller, 1969)
ValuesQuality
Igeo < 0Unpolluted
0 < Igeo < 1Unpolluted to moderately polluted
1 < Igeo < 2Moderately polluted
2 < Igeo < 3Moderately polluted to highly polluted
3 < Igeo < 4Highly polluted
4 < Igeo < 5Highly polluted to very highly polluted
5 < IgeoVery highly polluted
 Concentration of major and trace elements present in Ologe Lagoon in comparison with other background values
Concentration in reference materials
RangeMean ± SDUCCACCASV
Ca0.02 - 1.30.31 ± 0.352.995.29
Ti0.01 - 0.030.02 ± 0.01
Al0.1 - 1.970.70 ± 0.588.038.42
Na0.01 - 0.250.09 ± 0.08
K0.01 - 0.250.07 ± 0.072.811.08
P0 - 0.080.02 ± 0.02
Mg0.01 - 0.550.16 ± 0.171.323.18
S0.10 - 5.211.25 ± 1.45
Mo0.5 - 73.18.63 ± 19.94
As5.0 - 5.05.00 ± 0.001.51
U0.8 - 13.93.38 ± 4.46
Th0.5 - 7.62.84 ± 2.25
Sr6.0 - 9534.53 ± 25.94
V13 - 6528.75 ± 20.90
La1.2 - 21.27.21 ± 6.08
Cr2.2 - 44.214.22 ± 13.1585185
Ba9 - 10932.78 ± 28.80
Hg0.06 - 0.210.13 ± 0.08
Sc0.5 - 7.52.57 ± 2.00
Tl0.5 - 0.70.60 ± 0.10
Ga5.0 - 7.06.25 ± 0.96
Cu0.5 - 20.96.43 ± 6.20257545
Pb0.7 - 114.49 ± 3.4817820
Zn5.0 - 46.026.44 ± 14.065
Ni0.8 - 21.46.69 ± 6.004410568
Co2.2 - 17.16.44 ± 4.28172919
Mn14 - 1039278.13 ± 343.445001400850
4. Results and Discussions4.1. Geochemical Analysis

The concentration of 30 elements (Ag, As, U, Mo, Cd, Sb, Bi, V, W, Hg, Ti, Ga, Se, K, Ca, P, La, Mg, Ba, Ti, Cr, U, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, Fe. Th, Sr, and Mo) were determined. Thirteen elements had concentrations below detection limits in some sediments samples: Ag (0.5 ppm), As (5 ppm), U (0.5 ppm), Mo (0.5 ppm), Cd (0.5 ppm), Sb (0.5 ppm), Bi (0.5 ppm), V (10 ppm), W (0.5 ppm), Hg (0.05), Ti (0.5 ppm), Ga (5 ppm) and Se (2 ppm). Seven toxic metals (Co, Cu, Cr, Ni, Zn, Mn, and Pb) were considered for the assessment of heavy metal pollution in the lagoon. The statistics of the results of the geochemical analysis of the sediments together with other reference values are presented in Table 4. The heavy metal ranges for the average concentrations in the stations are Cu (2.63 - 18.63 ppm), Pb (2.08 - 9.98 ppm), Zn (15.50 - 45.00 ppm), Ni (2.50 - 17.60 ppm), Co (3.23 - 12.53 ppm), Mn (70.50 - 839.50 ppm) and Cr (4.58 - 39.20 ppm). The order of abundance of heavy metals in the six sample stations are as follows; S1: Mn > Zn > Cr > Cu > Ni > Co > Pb; S2: Mn > Zn > Cr > Co > Ni > Pb > Cu; S3: Mn > Zn > Cr > Co > Cu > Ni > Pb; S4: Mn > Zn > Cr > Co > Pb > Ni > Cu; S5: Mn > Zn > Cr > Cu >Co > Ni > Pb; S6: Mn > Zn > Cr > Ni > Co > Cu > Pb.

In Station 1, Cu and Ni have concentration above the USEPA standards (USEPA, 1999) . A plot showing the distribution of major elements and heavy metals concentration is presented in Figure 2. The plot shows that Station 1 has higher abundance of elements which could be as a result of the proximity of the sampling point to the Agbara industrial estate. The average heavy metal concentrations from the Sampling points were compared with geochemical background values

such as United State Environmental Protection Agency Standard (USEPA, 1999) and the Average Shale Value (Turekian & Wedepohl, 1961) . The concentration of Mn in Station 1 is higher than the global average shale values and the United State Environmental Protection Agency. The enrichment suggests contributions from anthropogenic activities such as smelting and industrial effluents. Pb (avg. 4.49 ppm) has the lowest concentration highest in the sediments.

The correlation exercise shows a strong degree of association between all the elements and Al suggesting that the elements in Ologe Lagoon have a common source except for Ca, Ba and P (Table 5). The principal component analysis is presented in Table 6 and the analysis shows that the elements can be divided into two components. Predominant elements in Component 1 are Al, K, Sc, Cr, Th, Fe, Ni, Cu and S which accounted for a total variance of about 79.71% in the data matrix. The strong degree of association of Component 1 with Fe, Mn and Al suggests that the elements are geogenic in origin and likely product of weathering and erosion of rocks (Mico et al., 2006; Bloomfield et al., 1976) . Component 2 elements are Ba, Ca and P which account for a total variance of about 13.40% and the sources are more likely to be from biological processes in the marine environment.

The concentration distribution of heavy metals across vertical profiles retrieved from cores samples of soft sediments at S1, S2, S3, S4, S5 and S6 within

The correlation of elements in sediments from Ologe lagoon
CuPbNiCoMnFeThCaPLaCrMgBaTiAlKScS
Cu1.0
Pb0.91.0
Ni1.00.91.0
Co0.80.90.81.0
Mn0.90.90.80.71.0
Fe0.90.90.90.90.81.0
Th1.00.81.00.80.80.91.0
Ca0.40.70.40.60.70.50.31.0
P0.60.80.60.70.80.60.50.91.0
La1.00.91.00.80.90.91.00.50.71.0
Cr1.00.91.00.80.80.91.00.30.61.01.0
Mg1.00.91.00.80.90.90.90.50.71.00.91.0
Ba0.20.50.30.50.50.30.10.90.70.30.20.31.0
Ti0.90.70.90.60.70.80.90.20.40.90.90.80.11.0
Al1.00.91.00.80.80.91.00.40.61.01.01.00.20.91.0
K1.00.81.00.70.80.91.00.30.51.01.00.90.10.91.01.0
Sc1.00.91.00.80.80.91.00.40.61.01.00.90.20.91.01.01.0
S0.90.80.90.80.81.00.90.40.50.90.90.90.20.70.90.90.91.0
 Principal component analyses of elements in sediments of Ologe lagoon
ElementsFactor 1Factor 2
Cu0.99
Pb0.740.40
Ni0.97
Co0.680.37
Mn0.700.41
Fe0.91
Th1.04
Ca0.96
P0.340.76
La0.97
Cr1.00
Mg0.91
Ba1.00
Ti0.98
Al1.00
K1.00
Sc1.00
S0.92
Eigenvalues
Total14.352.41
% of Variance79.7113.40
Cumulative %79.7193.11
Total14.095.45

the Ologe lagoon is illustrated in Figure 3. Generally, the heavy metals concentration fluctuated with depth and were observed to be depleted at the shallow depth (0 and 10 cm) in stations S1, S4, S5 and S6 suggesting the impacts of sand dredging activities within the lagoon. Naturally, elements accumulate more within the first 10 cm of the profile, due to adsorption to organic materials and relatively immobility (Ong & Kamaruzzaman, 2009) . Cu, Cr, Mn and Ni were observed to be greatly accumulated at the top of the sediments in the profile S4.

4.2. Contamination Indices in the Sediments4.2.1. Enrichment Factor

Enrichment factor was calculated using Al due to its wide usage as a reference material. The element was also used because it is present in the environment in small quantities (Loska & Wiechula, 2003) . The result of the EF of the sediments classified and presented in Table 7. The result showed that Cr and Cu are

Classification of enrichment factor in heavy metals from Ologe sediments
MeanMinMaxDescription
Cu1.590.803.87minimal to moderately enriched
Pb3.071.826.30minimal to significantly enriched
Zn3.312.056.43moderate to significant
Ni1.030.721.52minimal enrichment
Co5.392.8110.75moderate to significant
Mn3.361.0414.46minimal to significantly enriched
Cr1.751.402.38minimal to moderately enriched

minimal to moderately enriched; Pb and Mn are minimal to significantly enriched; Zn and Co are moderate to significantly enriched while Ni has minimal enrichment. The result for enrichment factor shows the high presence of anthropogenic influence from industrial release of effluents into the Ologe Lagoon agreeing with the work of (Han et al., 2006; Edori & Nna, 2018) .

4.2.2. Contamination Factor (CF)

The contamination factor of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, and Cr for all the samples collected from the lagoon ranged between 0.01 - 0.42, 0.04 - 0.55, 0.05 - 0.51, 0.01 - 0.27, 0.11 - 0.86, 0.02 - 1.22 and 0.02 - 0.44 respectively. The values indicate low contamination of the sediments in the lagoon.

4.2.3. Geo-Accumulation Index (I<sub>geo</sub>)

The Geo-accumulation (Igeo) values for all seven heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn and Cr) in the sediments are presented in Table 8 and classified according to Muller (1969) . The Igeo values for Cu and Pb in the stations ranged between 1 and 2.8 indicating moderately to strongly pollution in the sediments; Zn ranged from 2.5 to 3.5 and suggests a moderate to strong pollution levels; Co also shows a level of pollution of (1.5 - 2.4) making it moderately polluted. Igeo values for Mn indicates extremely pollution in all stations with values ranging between 4.1 and 5.8. Cr showed a moderate to strong level of pollution with values of between 2.2 and 3.5.

Geo-accumulation index of different heavy metals in Ologe lagoon
ElementsIgeo RangeDescription
Cu1 - 2.8From moderately polluted to extremely polluted
Pb1 - 8.7Moderately polluted to extremely polluted
Zn2.5 - 3.5From moderately to Strongly polluted
Ni1.6 - 3.1From moderately polluted to strongly polluted
Co1.5 - 2.4Moderately polluted
Mn4.1 - 5.8From strongly polluted to extremely polluted
Cr2.2 - 3.5From moderately polluted to strongly polluted
5. Conclusion

This study showed that the Lagoon accumulates toxic metals as a result of anthropogenic activities evident in the dumping of municipal and industrial waste and showed that Ologe Lagoon is a major sink for effluents from Agbara Industrial Estate. The heavy metal contents in the Lagoon sediments Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr, Al concentrations were taken in Part per Million (PPM) ratio with an average concentration of metals in each station. Based on Sediment Quality Guidelines, the abundance of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr and Mn in the Ologe Lagoon suggests moderate pollution with only Mn having strongly to extremely polluted values. The anthropogenic sources of this metal include municipal waste discharges, sewage sludge, and mineral processing (smelting). The sediments of Ologe Lagoon have a range of minimal to extremely high enrichment of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr, and Al. Cr showed the highest level of enrichment in Station 1 while other stations were of significant levels of enrichment. The mean values of 7 elements (Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co and Mn) have a strong positive correlation or relationship with each other. The good and strong positive correlations indicate that the heavy metals in Ologe Lagoon might have a common source which is likely anthropogenic origin. The abundance of Mn may be attributed to anthropogenic activities especially from the metal dumps sites and smelting industry. The mean concentration of Mn was more than the sediment quality guidelines thus making it a pollutant to the environment. Environmental monitoring of the Ologe Lagoon is highly recommended.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Adeyemi, M. O., Olusola, J. A., Akpobasah, O., Adidi, N. E., & Shelle, R. O. D. (2019). Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Sediments from Ologe Lagoon, Agbara, Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 7, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2019.77006

ReferencesAlloway, B. J. (Ed.). (2012). Heavy Metals in Soils: Trace Metals and Metalloids in Soils and Their Bioavailability (Vol. 22). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Anetekhai, M. A., Akin-Oriola, G. A., Aderinola, O. J., & Akintola, S. L. (2007). Trace Metal Concentration in Macrobrachium vollenhovenii from Ologe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria. Journal of Afrotropical Zoology, 25-29.Bloomfield, C., Kelso, W. I., & Pruden, G. (1976). Reactions between Metals and Humified Organic Matter. Journal of Soil Science, 27, 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1976.tb01971.xBosman, C., & Kidd, M. (2009). Water Pollution. In H. Strydom, & N. King (Eds.), Environmental Management in South Africa (pp. 630-695). Cape Town: Juta and Company Ltd.Bryan, G. W. (1976). Some Aspects of Heavy Metal Tolerance in Aquatic Organisms. In A. P. M. Lockhood (Ed.), Effects of Pollutants on Aquatic Organisms (p. 193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Connell, D., Lam, P., Richardson, B., & Wu, R. (1999). Introduction to Ecotoxicology (71 p.). Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.Duffus, J. (2002). Heavy Metals—A Meaningless Term. Pure Applied Chemistry, 74, 793-807. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200274050793Edori, O. S., & Nna, P. J. (2018). Determination of Physicochemical Parameters of Effluents at Discharge Points into the New Calabar River along Rumuolumeni Axis, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental and Analytical Toxicology, 8, 585.Hakanson, L. (1980). An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control. A Sedimentological Approach. Water Research, 14, 975-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8Han, Y., Du, P., Cao, J., & Posmentier, E. S. (2006). Multivariate Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Urban Dusts of Xi’an, Central China. Science of the Total Environment, 355, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.026Hariprasad, N., & Dayananda, H. (2013). Environmental Impact Due to Agricultural Runoff Containing Heavy Metals—A Review. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3, 1-6Ita R. E., & Anwana E. D. ,et al. (2017). Geochemical Assessment of Heavy Metal Contamination in Rural and Urban Wetlands in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria New York Science Journal 10, 43-51.Kumolu-Johnson, C. A., Ndimele, P. E., Akintola, S. L., & Jibuike, C. C. (2010). Copper, Zinc and Iron Concentrations in Water, Sediment and Cynothrissa mento (Regan 1917) from Ologe Lagoon, Lagos, Nigeria: A Preliminary Survey. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 35, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2010.466588Kusemiju V., Fadiya A. A., Aderinola O. J., & Akintola S. L. ,et al. (2001). Comparative Analysis of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediments and Tissues of Lumbricus violaceus from Agbara and Iba Streams Nigerian Journal of Research and Review in Science 2, 114-117.Loizidou, M., Haralambous, K. J., & Sakellarides, P. O. (1992). Environmental Study of the Marians Part II. A Study on the Removal of Metals from the Marianas Sediments. Environmental Technology, 13, 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593339209385150Loska, K., & Wiechula, D. (2003). Application of Principal Component Analysis for the Estimation of Source Heavy Metal Contamination in Surface Sediments from Rybnik Reservoir. Chemosphere, 51, 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00187-5Mico, C., Recatala, L., Peris, M., & Sanchez, J. (2006). Assessing Heavy Metal Sources in Agricultural Soils of an European Mediterranean Area by Multivariate Analysis. Chemosphere, 65, 863-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.016Mmolawa K. B., Likuku A. S., & Gaboutloeloe G. K. ,et al. (2011). Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Soils along Major Roadside Areas in Botswana African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 5, 186-196.Muller G. ,et al. (1969). Index of Geoaccumulation in Sediments of the Rhine River Journal of Geology 2, 109-118.Ong, M. C., & Kamaruzzaman, B. Y. (2009). An Assessment of Metals (Pb and Cu) Contamination in Bottom Sediment from South China Sea Coastal Waters, Malaysia. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 1418-1423. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2009.1418.1423Scott, R. O., Ure, A. M., Philp, J. M., Glynn, J. P., McLean, W. R., Stanton, D. L., & West, T. S. (1972). Some Sources of Contamination in Trace Analysis. Proceedings of the Society for Analytical Chemistry, 9, 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1039/sa9720900288Sinex, S. A., & Helz, G. R., (1981). Regional Geochemistry of Trace Elements in Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Geography, 3, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473521Smith, D. (1985). Sources of Heavy Metal Input to the New Zealand Aquatic Environment. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 15, 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.1985.10421714Tippie, V. K. (1984). An Environmental Characterization of Chesapeake Bay and a Frame Work for Action. In V. Kennedy (Ed.), The Estuary as a Filter (pp. 467-487). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405070-9.50028-1Turekian, K. K., & Wedepohl, K. H. (1961). Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earth’s Crust. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 72, 175-192. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[175:DOTEIS]2.0.CO;2USEPA (1999). USEPA Reference Methodology Standard Opening Procedure for the Digestion of Soil/Sediment Sample Using a Hot Plate/Beaker Digestion Technique, Chicago, IL. SW-846.Zheng, N., Wang, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, D., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, S. (2007). Population Health Risk Due to Dietary Intake of Heavy Metals in the Industrial Area of Huludao City, China. Science of the Total Environment, 387, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.07.044