<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2150-4091</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ns.2019.116021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NS-93403</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Predictions of El Ni&amp;#241;o, La Ni&amp;#241;a and Record Low Chicago Temperature by Sunspot Number
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tai-Jin</surname><given-names>Kim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Suwon, Hwasung-City, South Korea</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>06</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>204</fpage><lpage>220</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The El Ni
  
  
  
  n
  
  o Index, defined as 4 intensities (very strong, strong, moderate, weak) in Oceanic Ni&amp;#241;o Index (ONI), was positively correlated with the average sunspot number at each intensity. The La Ni&amp;#241;a Index, defined as 3 intensities (strong, moderate, weak) in ONI, was negatively
  
   correlated 
  
  with the average sunspot number from 1954 to 2017. It appears that very strong El Ni&amp;#241;o events occur frequently during the maximal sunspot number while strong La Ni&amp;#241;a events more often occur during the minimal sunspot number. Since greenhouse-gas is continuously increased, it is therefore proposed that the maximal sunspot number is a major parameter for prediction of El Ni&amp;#241;o while the minimal sunspot number applies in the same way for La Ni&amp;#241;a. El Nino/La Nina events can be classified as four typical cases depending upon the submarine volcanic activities at seamounts in Antarctica and South America. The Sea Surface Temperature (SST) of the South and Central Americas are warmer than SST of East Australian Current (EAC), due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Seamounts and the Ridges in South and Central Americas. This results in the Central Pacific Current (CPC) flowing from east to west due to the second law of thermodynamics for thermal flow from hot source to cold sink. In contrast the opposite direction is made if SST in EAC is warmer than SST in the Central/South American Seamounts and Ridges, due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Antarctic Seamounts and Ridges. Chicago was selected as a case study for the relationship between extreme cold weather conditions and minimal sunspot number. Previous attemp
  t
  s at predicting weather patte
  r
  ns in Chicago have largely failed. The years of the record low temperatures in Chicago were significantly correlated with the years of the minimal sunspot number from 1873 to 2019. It is forecast that there may occur a weak La Ni&amp;#241;a in 2019 and another record low temperature in Chicago in January of 2020 due to the phase of the minimal sunspot number in 2019. It may be possible to predict very strong El Ni
  
  
  
  n
  
  o events with the year of maximal sunspot number as El Ni&amp;#241;o Index (R<sup>2</sup>
   
  =
   
  0.7363) and the years of strong volcanic eruption in the Galapagos Hot Spot (GHS) (R<sup>2</sup>
   
  =
   
  0.9939), respectively. An El Ni&amp;#241;o event is thus expected during the year of strong volcanic eruption in the GHS. Strong La Ni&amp;#241;a events can be expected during the year of minimal sunspot number with La Ni&amp;#241;a Index (R<sup>2</sup>
   
  =
   
  0.9922). Record low temperatures in Chicago can be also predicted (R<sup>2</sup>
   
  =
   
  0.9995) during the year of the minimal sunspot number, as was recently the case in January, 2019.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Prediction</kwd><kwd> El Ni&#241;o</kwd><kwd> La Ni&#241;a</kwd><kwd> Record Low Chicago Temperature</kwd><kwd> Sunspot Number</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The sunspot numbers between 1870 and 2020 are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref1">1</xref>] while the detailed sunspot number between 2000 and 2019 was shown in another work of Hataway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref2">2</xref>]. Ultraviolet radiation increases dramatically during high sunspot activity. The converse is true during minimum sunspot activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref3">3</xref>]. Since 1880 AD, El Ni&#241;o events have occurred roughly every 2 - 7 years with no clear periodicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref4">4</xref>] while the sunspot number (measured in Brussels of Belgium and Ottawa/British Columbia of Canada [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref5">5</xref>]) changes through an average cycle of 11 years with 14 months (1 year and 2 months) standard deviation. Maximal sunspot number causes the highest solar radiation upon the Earth to induce very strong El Ni&#241;o events while the minimal sunspot number provides the lowest solar radiation upon the Earth to induce strong La Ni&#241;a events, as well as the record low temperature in Chicago, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Kim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref5">5</xref>] proposed the minimal sunspot number for prediction of the avian influenza virus outbreak from 1878 to 2016 with high linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9967).</p><p>Kim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref6">6</xref>] also showed that there was a close relationship (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8539) between MERS-CoV in Eastern Mediterrane region and maximal sunspot number from 2012 to 2018.</p><p>The purpose of the present study is to predict important natural phenomena such as El Ni&#241;o and La Ni&#241;a events, and years of the record low Chicago temperature by the sunspot number.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Background</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. El Ni&#241;o and La Ni&#241;a Events</title><p>Every two to seven years, an unusually warm pool of water—sometimes two to three degrees Celsius higher than normal—develops across the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean to create a natural short-term climate change event. This warm condition, known as El Ni&#241;o, spurs extreme weather patterns around the world, from flooding in California to droughts in Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref7">7</xref>]. It happens when Sea Surface Temperature (SST) in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean warm up and the increased ocean surface temperatures influence air and moisture movement around the globe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref8">8</xref>]. El Ni&#241;o is known as an irregularly occurring weather phenomenon created through an abnormality in wind and ocean circulation. While it originates in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean, El Ni&#241;o has wide-reaching effects. In a global context, it affects rainfall, ocean productivity, atmospheric gases and winds across continents. At a local level, it influences water supplies, fishing industries and food sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref9">9</xref>].</p><p>El Ni&#241;o/La Ni&#241;a events apparently play a critical role in the variability of Southern Ocean SST. Higher SST anomalies were observed in El Ni&#241;o years while cooler anomalies were seen during La Ni&#241;a years. During El Ni&#241;o years, the ocean becomes noticeably warmer and the air pressure is high with rainfall and flooding. La Ni&#241;a is essentially the anti-El Ni&#241;o. Instead of warm water and high air pressure, waters are cold and air pressure is low with drought and cold weather. La Ni&#241;a years often cause heavy snowfalls even in parts of the world far away from the Pacific [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref10">10</xref>].</p><p>Gay-Lussac’s law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref11">11</xref>] is given by,</p><p>P H T H = P L T L (1)</p><p>where</p><p>P<sub>H</sub>, P<sub>L</sub> = Pressures at high (El Ni&#241;o) and low (La Ni&#241;a) in the tropical Pacific,</p><p>T<sub>H</sub>, T<sub>L</sub> = Temperatures at high (El Ni&#241;o) and low (La Ni&#241;a).</p><p>An El Ni&#241;o event causes flooding due to T<sub>H</sub> with high evaporated seawater while La Ni&#241;a occurs due to T<sub>L</sub><sub> </sub>with low evaporated seawater. Therefore, if T<sub>H</sub><sub> </sub>of SST is satisfied, pressure becomes high (P<sub>H</sub>) so that the South Equatorial Current flows from the hot source of the east Pacific (P<sub>H</sub>, T<sub>H</sub>) to the cold sink of the west Pacific (P<sub>L</sub>, T<sub>L</sub>), according to the second law of thermodynamics.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Oceanic Ni&#241;o Index</title><p>The Oceanic Ni&#241;o Index (ONI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref12">12</xref>] is defined as the three-month running-mean SST departures from the average in the Ni&#241;o 3.4 region (i.e., 5˚N - 5˚S, 120˚W - 170˚W) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, and is a principal measure for monitoring, assessing, and predicting El Ni&#241;o-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). NOAA operational definitions for El Ni&#241;o and La Ni&#241;a are as follows:</p><p>El Ni&#241;o: characterized by a positive ONI greater than or equal to +0.5˚C.</p><p>La Ni&#241;a: characterized by a negative ONI less than or equal to −0.5˚C.</p><p>By historical standards, to be classified as a full-fledged El Ni&#241;o or La Ni&#241;a episode, these thresholds must be exceeded for a period of at least 5 consecutive overlapping 3-month seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref13">13</xref>]. ONI has become the defacto standard that NOAA uses for identifying El Ni&#241;o (warm) and La Ni&#209;a (cool) events in the tropical Pacific.</p><p>El Ni&#241;o regions in the Pacific were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and defined as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref13">13</xref>]:</p><p>1) El Ni&#241;o (1 + 2) 0˚ - 10˚S, 80˚ - 90˚W east Pacific</p><p>2) El Ni&#241;o (3) 5˚N - 5˚S, 90˚ - 150˚W central Pacific</p><p>3) El Ni&#241;o (4) 5˚N - 5˚S, 150˚ - 160˚W west Pacific.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Galapagos Hot Spot</title><p>The Galapagos Islands are reported to be a “hot spot”, which is a region of high thermic flux due to the presence of a magmatic plume ascending from the earth’s mantle (700 - 3000 km) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref14">14</xref>]. The hot energy side of the internal thermic magma after volcanic eruption in the GHS is transferred to the cold energy side of the undersea seamount of the Carnegie Ridge (CAR), which is a volcanic plateau formed during the eastward movement of the new Nazca Plate over the GHS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref15">15</xref>]. The Galapagos archipelago, which is made up of 13 major volcanic islands, occupies a submerged platform, which rises more than 3 kilometers above the adjacent seafloor. Upwelling within the nutrient-laden Peru Current is responsible for the great biological productivity of the ocean off the coasts of Peru and Chile.</p><p>The trade winds blow from the normally high-pressure area over the eastern Pacific (near Central and South America) to the normally stable low-pressure area over the western Pacific (north of Australia). In the Southern Oscillation, winds across the tropical Pacific reverse direction and blow from west to east.</p><p>During El Ni&#241;o events, the surface ocean around the Galapagos warms substantially and the islands receive significantly more rainfall than in normal years. The warmer water is less nutrient-enriched than the cool waters that normally surround the Galapagos and the marine ecosystem consequently becomes disrupted, resulting in a high mortality rate of coral, seabirds, and marine mammals during the strongest El Ni&#209;o events, such as those in 1982-83 and 1997-98 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref16">16</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Volcanic Seamounts</title><p>The planet’s crust is broken into 17 major rigid tectonic plates while volcanoes and earthquakes are generally found in the plate boundaries at the bottom of the oceans. Therefore, most volcanic activity is submarine, as seen in deep sea hydrothermal (≥350˚C) black smokers vents of volcanic gases at the East Pacific Rise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref17">17</xref>].</p><p>Volcanic gases are commonly composed in the order of H<sub>2</sub>O (37% - 97.1%), CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> (0.50% - 11.8%), H<sub>2</sub>, CO, H<sub>2</sub>S (0.04% - 0.68%), HCl, HF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref18">18</xref>]. Toxic chemicals (SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, HCl, HF, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) from submarine volcanoes have reduced the fishery productivity.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes the Ridge and Basin of South and Central Americas.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. East Pacific and Central American Countries with Volcanoes</title><p>Peru (Humboldt) Current with South Equatorial Current moves away from the sources of volcanoes in the Galapagos Islands, Peru, Chile, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Colombia and Ecuador toward the sink of the west Pacific along trajectories of South Equatorial Current and Equatorial Winds in the equatorial Pacific.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes the East Pacific and Central American Countries with precipitation, area, heat source, volcano, earthquake, and Ridge.</p><p>It is evident that countries in the Equatorial Pacific Ocean located in mixing zones in the Panama Basin among warm (Panama 30˚C, South Equatorial 27˚C) and cold (Peruvian Coastal 16˚C~21˚C, Peruvian Oceanic 9˚C~21˚C, Cromwell 13˚C) currents, showed extensive precipitations; Costa Rica (2926 mm),</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Ridge and basin of South and Central Americas</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Step</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plate/Country</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chile Rise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 45˚S/76 - 104˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca Plate/Antarctic Plate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Juan Fern&#225;ndez Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33˚S/76 - 82˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >900 (3900 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic islands and 11 seamount chains on the Nazca Plate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chile Basin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 32.5˚S/80 - 90˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4800 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chile</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iquique Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 - 28˚S/73 - 79˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peru-Chile Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5 - 22˚S/76.3 - 82˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 (200 km wide)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peru Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peru Basin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14˚S/83˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca Plate/Peru</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecuador Continental Shelf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(200 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca Plate/Ecuador</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecuador Insular Shelf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca Plate/Ecuador</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carnegie Ridge (Galapagos Islands, 13 volcanoes)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 2˚S/81.3 - 85.0˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1350 (300 km wide) (1000 - 3500 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecuador</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocos-Nazca Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 3˚N/94.6 - 96.5˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galapagos (Cocos-Nazca) Spreading Center</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malpelo Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 5˚N/80 - 81˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 km (100 km wide)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carnegie Ridge/Colombia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panama Basin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5˚N/83.3˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(3300 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surrounded by Panama, Colombia, Ecuador</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coiba Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3˚N/81.45˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150 km (100 km wide)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panama</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocos Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 - 8.5˚N/82.8 - 90.3˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 (200 km wide) (1000 - 3000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocos Plate, Costa Rica</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2˚N/96˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Undersea Features</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guatemala Basin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 11˚N/87 - 99˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2600 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocos Plate (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tehuantepec Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3˚N/98˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2000 - 4000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >West Coast Mexico</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >East Pacific Rise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5 - 14˚N/104 - 104.5˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(200 - 700 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gulf of California, Pacific Plate/ North American Plate/ Cocos Plate</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> East Pacific and Central American countries with precipitation, area, heat amount, volcano, earthquake and Ridge</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Precipitation</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Area (km<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Heat Amount</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Volcano Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Earthquake Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ridge</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >During year of 2011 (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#215;10<sup>18</sup> cal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rank</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Costa Rica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2926</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51,100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocos (Costa Rica Province, Cocos Island Province, Southwest Province)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Panama</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coiba</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colombia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2612</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,141,748</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carnegie/Malpelo/ Columbia-Ecuador Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nicaragua</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129,494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nicaraguan fore-arc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecuador</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283,561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carnegie</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guatemala</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,889</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle American Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Honduras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1976</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112,492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle American Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peru</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1738</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,279,999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nazca</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >El Salvador</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1724</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle American Trench</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >756,102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chile Rise</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mexico</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >752</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,972,550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tehuantepec/ East Pacific Rise</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Panama (2692), Columbia (2612), Nicaragua (2391), Ecuador (2087) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). From the steam table [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref19">19</xref>], the difference in the specific volume of water evaporation, between a warm 30˚C and cold 15˚C, is 61 m<sup>3</sup>/kg, which is converted to the rainfall. During El Ni&#241;o, California and the southern United States also tend to receive more rainfall. On the other hand, during past El Ni&#241;o events, Indonesia, Central America and the southern and central Amazon experienced more fire activity than normal due to droughts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref20">20</xref>], the latter being caused by lack of water evaporation forming the rainfall accounting for the total mass balance of water. Heat transport is mainly governed by the status of Humboldt, Panama, Cromwell, and South Equatorial Currents. Heat is delivered in numbered sequence from hot heat countries (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) of Columbia (1), Peru (2), Mexico (3), Chile (4), and Ecuador (5) to the cold sinks of Nicaragua (6), Guatemala (7), Honduras (8), Panama (9), Costa Rica (10), and El Salvador (11) to produce high precipitations by collision between the cold Humbodt Current at 15˚C and the warm Panama Current at 30˚C to have a heat exchange of Q = m C p ( 30 − 15 ) = 15 m ( cal ⋅ g − 1 ) . Heat amount (Q) in calories was determined by multiplication of country area (km<sup>2</sup>) with individual precipitations (mm) to get the mass (m) in gram assuming the water density of 1 g∙cm<sup>−3</sup> which is multiplied by 15 for the final determination of individual heat amount for each country, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Antarctic Currents, Seamounts, and Ridges</title><p>Near the southern extremity of South America, most of the Antarctic Circumpolar Circulation (ACC) flows at 4 km∙h<sup>−1</sup> eastward into the Atlantic (50˚S), but part of it curves toward the left and flows generally northward along the west coast of South America as the Peru Current (40˚S~45˚S). If the length of South American coastline (8409 km) is approximated, the time it takes the Peru Current from the Antarctic to</p><p>reach the Galapagos, is determined at a minimal 2.9 months { = 8409   km 4 km ⋅ h − 1 } ( 24   h ⋅ d − 1 ) ( 30   d ⋅ m − 1 ) with a current speed of ACC (4 km∙h<sup>−1</sup>). If applying the Peru Current speed of 40 cm∙s<sup>−1</sup> (1.44 km∙h<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref21">21</xref>], the required time is 8.1 months { = ( 8409   km ) / 1.44   km ⋅ h − 1 ( 24   h ⋅ d − 1 ) ( 30   d ⋅ m − 1 ) } . Therefore, part of the ACC reaches the equatorial regime in the form of the Peru Current within a period of 2.9 months to 8.1 months.</p><p>During the El Ni&#241;o, warm eastward-flowing waters from the equator dominate the Humboldt Current causing changes such as the increase of water temperature by up to 2˚C to 3˚C, sea-level rises up to 40 to 50 cm and a reduction in the availability of surface nutrients. Such changes have devastating consequences for pelagic fisheries off Chile, Peru and Ecuador, and for the marine fauna that relies on these normally highly productive areas. The El Ni&#241;o event has also been associated with coral bleaching, mortality and changes in the abundance and distribution of seabirds, marine mammals and sea turtles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref22">22</xref>], which might be caused by volcanic activities of Ridge and Rises in Antarctica, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>Submarine volcanism occurs at the Mid Ocean Ridges (MORs), Back-Arc Spreading, Arc Volcanism, and Hotspots. The flux of volcanic CO<sub>2</sub> to the ocean are MORs (27.8%), Back-Arc Basins (37.8), Volcanic Arcs (34.1), Hotspots (0.3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref23">23</xref>]. The temperature of magma is 1200˚C while cold seawater percolates down through the crust to produce black smokers at 350˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref17">17</xref>]. The California Current and Humboldt Current pass through oceanic hotspots with Holocene activity until they join together at the Galapagos Island Hotspots located at the boundaries of Cocos Plate and Nazca Plate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref24">24</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. El Ni&#209;o and La Ni&#209;a Events</title><p>Submarine volcanoes are underwater vents or fissures in the Earth’s surface from which magma can erupt. They are estimated to account for 75% of annual magma output. The vast majority are located near areas of tectonic plate movement, known as ocean ridges. Many submarine volcanoes are seamounts, typically extinct volcanoes that rise abruptly from a seafloor of 1000 - 4000 meters depth. The peaks are often found hundreds to thousands of meters below the surface, and are therefore considered to be within the deep sea. An estimated 30,000 seamounts occur across the globe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref25">25</xref>].</p><p>El Nino/La Nina events can be classified as four typical cases depending upon the submarine volcanic activities at seamounts in Antarctica and South America, as summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>Detailed description of columns in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> are as follows:</p><p>1) Sunspot number in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> is categorized in 4 groups of strong maximal, weak maximal, weak minimal, and strong minimal. The strong maximal group is regarded as the period of the warmest SST due to submarine volcanic eruptions induced by the strong solar radiation. The strong minimal group is regarded as the period of the coldest SST due to lack of submarine volcanic eruptions induced by the weak solar radiation.</p><p>2) Submarine volcanic activities occur (o) or don’t occur (x) at the seamounts of Antarctica (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and South America (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) in conjunction with Rises and Ridges.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Antarctic seamounts and ridges</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Step</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remark</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pacific-Antarctic Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54˚30' - 65˚28S/ 160˚15' - 180˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Southern Extension of East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Pacific Plate/Antarctic Plate)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mid-Atlantic Rise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atlantic Ocean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Southwest Indian Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53˚S/20 - 24˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250 km</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indian Ocean (African Plate/Antarctic Plate)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Southeast Indian Ridge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 62˚S/ 70 - 170˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indian Ocean seafloor (Indo-Australian Plate/Antarctic Plate)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. Tasman Rise (Tasmania Ridge)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 51˚S/ 147 - 150˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(800 - 3000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Southern Ocean, Australia seafloor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Campbell Plateau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50˚40'S/171˚E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(500 - 1000 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >New Zealand (Large submarine plateau)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chatham Rise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39˚50'S - 50˚04'S/ 171˚29' - 178˚03'</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 km (544 - 3735 m depth)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >New Zealand (Productive fishing ground)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marie Byrd Seamount</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114 - 131˚W/ 68 - 71˚S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800 km</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amundsen Sea</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orca Seamount</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62˚S/58˚W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 km wide (500 m height)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bransfield Strait</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Sandwitch Islands (11 volcanic islands)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56˚18' - 59˚27'S/ 26˚23' - 28˚08'W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310 km<sup>2 </sup> (1370 m highest)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Atlantic Ocean/Scotia Sea</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Four typical cases depending upon the submarine volcanic activities at seamounts in Antarctica and South America</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Case</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sunspot Number<sup>1) </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Submarine Volcanic Activity<sup>2)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SST<sup>3)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sea Ice Extent<sup>4)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Krill Abundance<sup>5)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fishery Productivity<sup>6)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >El Ni&#241;o<sup>7)</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >La Ni&#241;a <sup>7)</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ⅰ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong Maximal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antarctica (o) South America (o)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ ↑↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ ↓↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ⅱ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak Maximal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antarctica (x) South America (o)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ ↑↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ ↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ⅲ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak Minimal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antarctica (o) South America (x)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ ↓↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ ↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ⅳ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong Minimal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antarctica (x) South America (x)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓ ↓↓</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ -</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↑ ↑↑</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >↓↓</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>3) Sea surface temperature (SST) of the Equatorial Pacific is dependent upon SST caused by volcanic activities at seamounts in Antarctica (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and South America (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) with Rises and Ridges. SST shows increase (↑), strong increase (↑↑), decrease (↓), and strong decrease (↓↓), strong or weak (↑↓) or (↓↑).</p><p>4) Sea ice extent is dependent upon undersea volcanoes found off the West Antarctic ice sheet of the South Georgia Islands and South Sandwich Island, whose undersea volcanic system generates earthquakes and releases heat into the ice above to destabilize parts of the ice cap [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref26">26</xref>]. Sea ice extent decreases (↓) with undersea volcanic eruption and increases (↑) without undersea volcanic eruption, and is only applicable to Antarctica.</p><p>5) Krill abundance is proportional to sea ice extent during austral winter. It decreases (↓) with volcanic eruptions while melting ice by volcanic heat is increased (↑) with weak volcanic eruption.</p><p>6) Fishery productivity is decreased (↓) or strongly decreased (↓↓) if submarine volcanoes are present and have less phytoplankton growth due to volcanic toxic chemicals (SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S, HCl, HF, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) and further kill fish, bird, turtles and coral reefs. With weak volcanic eruptions in Antarctica fishery productivity is increased (↑) or further strongly increased (↑↑) with weak eruptions at seamounts of South America.</p><p>7) El Ni&#241;o is strong (↑↑) when there are eruptions at the seamounts of Antarctica and South America at the same time, as in Case I. El Ni&#241;o is weak (↑) if the seamounts of South America have eruptions while no eruptions in the Antarctica, as in Case II. La Ni&#241;a is weak (↓) due to cooling by the Peru Current if there is only volcanic eruption in the undersea Antarctica with no volcanic eruptions at the seamounts of South America, as in Case III. There is a strong (↓↓) La Ni&#241;a if neither Antarctica nor South America have any submarine volcanic activities, as in Case IV.</p><p>It is important to note that the extents of El Ni&#241;o or La Nina events are dependent upon the submarine volcanic activities in Antarctica and South America. It can be thus postulated that El Nino and La Nina events are induced by the various degree of volcanic eruptions of seamounts in Antarctica, Central America, South America, and GHS, whose thermal currents toward the east Pacific and the west Pacific can be schematically drawn in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>There are two major currents induced by centrifugal forces of ACC to be perpendicular to two exits: one is East Australian Current (EAC) between Tasmania of Australia and New Zealand while another is</p><p>the Peru Current (PC) along the west coast of South America. The shortest course to reach the central Pacific ocean around the equator is EAC while the slowest course is PC. It appears that the Volcanic activity in the GHS (VGHS) is the key parameter to control the direction of Ocean Surface Current of Central Pacific Current (CPC). If SST of VGHS plus PC is warmer, due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Seamounts and the Ridges in South and Central Americas (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) than SST of EAC, CPC flows from east to west due to the second law of thermodynamics for thermal flow from hot source to cold sink. In contrast the opposite direction is made if SST in EAC is warmer, due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Antarctic Seamounts and Ridges (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), than SST of the sum of VGHS and PC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. El Ni&#241;o Index and La Ni&#241;a Index with Sunspot Number</title><p>When CO<sub>2</sub> is increased, ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) layers in the Poles become thinner so that UV radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref5">5</xref>] upon the Earth is increased. Increased solar radiation during maximal sunspot number [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref6">6</xref>] and enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> emission may induce El Ni&#241;o events through warm SST and strong volcanic eruptions at seamounts in Antarctica, South America, and GHS.</p><p>The El Ni&#241;o Index was plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) with respect to sunspot numbers in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> at each El</p><p>Ni&#241;o Index, defined as 4 degrees (Very Strong 4, Strong 3, Moderate 2, Weak 1) of intensity from data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> while <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7363) was positively plotted with respect to average sunspot number. Due to the industrial development, CO<sub>2</sub> emission is continuously increasing. At minimal sunspot number in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, there is a weak solar radiation to induce cold SST and weak volcanic eruptions at seamounts for La Ni&#241;a. La Ni&#209;a Index, defined as 3 degrees (Strong 3, Moderate 2, Weak 1) from data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> was negatively plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) with respect to sunspot number. The sunspot number at each degree of La Ni&#241;a Index was averaged to get <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) with significant linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9922). It is interesting to note that very strong El Ni&#241;o events occur frequently during the maximal sunspot in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> while strong La Ni&#241;a events happen more often during the minimal sunspot number in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. El Ni&#241;o Event with Volcanic Eruption in Galapagos Hot Spot</title><p>The year of volcanic eruption in the GHS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref27">27</xref>] was correlated with the year of El Ni&#241;o events in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> to get the significant linearity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9939) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. It is evident that an El Ni&#241;o event is significantly dependent upon the volcanic eruption in the GHS. During the El Ni&#241;o years of 1986, 1997, 2003, 2006, and 2014 in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, there were no volcanic eruptions in the aboveground of the GHS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref27">27</xref>]. However, a</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> El Ni&#241;o and La Ni&#241;a years with the sunspot number in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and their intensities based on Oceanic Ni&#241;o Index (ONI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref12">12</xref>] while 4 El Ni&#241;o Index (very strong 4, strong 3, moderate 2, weak 1) and 3 La Ni&#241;a Index (strong 3, moderate 2, weak 1) give the sunspot numbers in parenthesis at each intensity of El Ni&#241;o/La Ni&#241;a events. It appears that very strong El Ni&#241;o events occur frequently during the maximal sunspot number while strong La Ni&#241;a events occur more often during the minimal sunspot number</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >El Ni&#241;o (Sunspot Number)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >La Ni&#241;a (Sunspot Number)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >(El Ni&#241;o Index)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >(La Ni&#241;a Index)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong (3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very Strong (4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate (2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong (3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1952-53 (0.05) 1953-54 (0.05) 1958-59 (0.34) 1969-70 (0.16) 1976-77 (0) 1977-78 (0.03) 1979-80 (0.25) 2004-05 (0.28) 2006-07 (0.05) 2014-15 (0.18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1951-52 (0.05) 1963-64 (0.04) 1968-69 (0.22) 1986-87 (0.04) 1994-95 (0.11) 2002-03 (0.29) 2009-10 (0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1957-58 (0.4) 1965-66 (0.02) 1972-73 (0.15) 1987-88 (0.05) 1991-92 (0.38)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1982-83 (0.38) 1997-98 (0.16) 2015-16 (0.19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1954-55 (0) 1964-65 (0.06) 1971-72 (0.21) 1974-75 (0.03) 1983-84 (0.28) 1984-85 (0.22) 2000-01 (0.27) 2005-06 (0.1) 2008-09 (0.02) 2016-17 (0.04) 2017-18 (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1955-56 (0.05) 1970-71 (0.22) 1995-96 (0.05) 2011-12 (0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1973-74 (0.09) 1975-76 (0) 1988-89 (0.05) 1998-99 (0.1) 1999-00 (0.11) 2007-08 (0.05) 2010-11 (0.02)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Galapagos expedition by an international team led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) revealed 70 unknown seamounts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref28">28</xref>]. Warm SST during El Ni&#241;o event may activate the thermal energy in the submarine seamount for volcanic eruption. Therefore, some of 70 seamounts in the GHS could volcanically erupt to induce El Ni&#241;o events during such vacant years. It may be possible to predict the year of the El Ni&#241;o event if there are volcanic eruptions either from aboveground volcanoes or submarine seamounts in the GHS.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Greenhouse-Gas Induction of El Ni&#241;o</title><p>During the maximal sunspot number, there is an El Ni&#209;o event, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b). As greenhouse-gas increases, the ozone hole deteriorates to induce El Ni&#241;o, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. Since greenhouse-gas continuously increases, it is therefore proposed that the maximal sunspot number is a major parameter for prediction of El Ni&#241;o while the minimal sunspot number works in the same way for La Ni&#241;a, as schematically summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Record Low Temperatures in Chicago with Minimal Sunspot Number</title><p>“Life-threatening” temperatures hit record daily low in Chicago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref29">29</xref>]; Temperature fell to make it the coldest Jan. 30, 2019 in Chicago on record minus 19 degrees, which beats the last record of minus 15 on Jan. 30, 1966. The lowest recorded temperature in Chicago ever is minus 27 degrees in 1985 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref30">30</xref>]. The 3 years of 1966, 1985, and 2019 are expressed in green arrows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> of the sunspot number. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> implies that the year of the lowest record temperatures in Chicago in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> from 1873 to 2019 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93403-ref30">30</xref>] is significantly (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9995) proportional to the year of the minimal sunspot number. Therefore, the lowest</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Years showing the record low temperature in Chicago with the years of minimal sunspot number from 1873 to 2019 and the years of corresponding La Ni&#241;a events</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year of Record Low Temperature in Chicago [ 30 ]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year of Minimal Sunspot Number (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year of Corresponding La Ni&#241;a Event (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February 23, 1873 January 2, 1879 February 8, 1899 January 7, 1912 1926 January 22, 1936 1945 January 29, 1966 January 16, 1977 January 20, 1985 January 19, 1994 February 5, 2007 January 30, 2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1873 1879 1902 1912 1926 1936 1945 1966 1975 1985 1995 2007 2019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >- - - - - - - 1964-65 1974-75 1984-85 1995-96 2007-08 2017-18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>record temperatures can be predicted during the year of minimum sunspot number along with the corresponding La Ni&#241;a events in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>Furthermore, it can be predicted that record low temperatures in Chicago can occur during La Ni&#241;a event, both of which showed good proportionalities; La Ni&#241;a Index, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9922 in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b), and the record low temperature in Chicago, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9995 in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> with the year of minimal sunspot number, respectively.</p><p>It may be possible to predict very strong El Ni&#241;o events with the year of maximal sunspot number as El Ni&#241;o Index (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7363) and the years of strong volcanic eruption in the Galapagos Hot Spot (GHS) (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9939), respectively. An El Ni&#241;o event is thus expected during the year of strong volcanic eruption in the GHS. Strong La Ni&#241;a events can be expected during the year of minimal sunspot number with La Ni&#241;a Index (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9922). Record low temperatures in Chicago can be also predicted (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9995) during the year of the minimal sunspot number, as was recently the case in January, 2019.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The El Ni&#209;o Index, defined as 4 intensities (very strong, strong, moderate, weak) in Oceanic Ni&#209;o Index (ONI), was positively correlated with the average sunspot number at each intensity. The La Ni&#241;a Index, defined as 3 intensities (strong, moderate, weak) in ONI, was negatively correlated with the average sunspot number from 1954 to 2017.</p><p>It appears that very strong El Ni&#241;o events occur frequently during the maximal sunspot number while strong La Ni&#241;a events occur more often during the minimal sunspot number. Since greenhouse-gas continuously increases, it is therefore proposed that the maximal sunspot number is a major parameter for prediction of El Ni&#241;o while the minimal sunspot number serves a predictive role for La Ni&#241;a.</p><p>There can be four typical cases depending upon the submarine volcanic activities at seamounts in Antarctica and South America for the various degrees of El Nino/La Nina events. If Sea Surface Temperature (SST) of South and Central Americas is warmer, due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Seamounts and the Ridges in South and Central Americas than SST of East Australian Current (EAC), Central Pacific Current (CPC) flows from east to west due to the second law of thermodynamics for thermal flow from hot source to cold sink. In contrast the opposite direction is made if SST in EAC is warmer, due to the strong volcanic eruptions in the Antarctic Seamounts and Ridges, than SST in the Central/South American Seamounts and Ridges.</p><p>The years of the record low temperatures in Chicago from 1873 to 2019 were significantly correlated with the years of the minimal sunspot number.</p><p>It is forecast that a weak La Ni&#241;a may occur in 2019 and another record low temperature in Chicago in January of 2020 due to the phase of the minimal sunspot number in 2019.</p><p>It may be possible to predict very strong El Ni&#241;o events with the year of maximal sunspot number as El Ni&#241;o Index (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.7363) and the years of strong volcanic eruption in the Galapagos Hot Spot (GHS) (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9939), respectively. An El Ni&#241;o event is thus expected during the year of strong volcanic eruption in the GHS. Strong La Ni&#241;a events can be expected during the year of minimal sunspot number with La Ni&#241;a Index (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9922). Record low temperatures in Chicago can be also predicted (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9995) during the year of the minimal sunspot number, as was recently the case in January, 2019.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author expresses sincere gratitude to the University of Suwon and G-Land of South Korea for their financial supports. Editing work undertaken by Professor Jonathan Wright is also greatly appreciated.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.93403-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hathaway, D.H. (2010) The Solar Cycle. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 7, 1.  
https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2010-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hathaway, D.H. (2015) The Solar Cycle. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 12, 4.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/lrsp-2015-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">https://www.weather.gov/fsd/sunspots</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, T.J., Prev Philander, S.G. and Fedorov, A. (2003) Is El Ni&amp;#241;o Sporadic or Cyclic? Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 31, 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.31.100901.141255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, T.-J. (2018) Prevention of Avian Influenza Virus by Ultraviolet Radiation and Prediction of Outbreak by Satellite Parameters. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 11, 182-206.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2018.117015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, T.J. (2019) Spanish Flu, SARS, MERS-CoV by CO2 Emission and Maximal Sunspot Number. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 12, 53-75. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2019.121005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NASA TV (2015) El Ni&amp;#241;o Event as Never before.  
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-studying-2015-el-nino-event-as-never-before</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jet Propulsion Laboratory (2016) El Ni&amp;#241;o/La Ni&amp;#241;a Observations.  
https://climatesciences.jpl.nasa.gov/projects/enso</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hille, K. (2015) NASA Maps El Ni&amp;#241;o’s Shift on U.S. Precipitation. NASA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mancero, J. (2017) Climate Change and Galapagos. Galapagos Island.com.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atkins, P. and Paula, J. (2010) Physical Chemistry. 9th Edition, W. H. Freeman Co., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Null, J. (2019) Historic Oceanic Ni&amp;#241;o Index (ONI) &amp; La Ni&amp;#241;a Winter Impacts on United States Weather Patterns. Golden Gate Weather Patterns. https://www.ggweather.com/enso/oni_la_nina.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NOAA (2019) Equatorial Pacific Sea Surface Temperatures.  
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/teleconnections/enso/indicators/sst</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MacDonald, K. (2010) What Is a Hotspot. NOAA Ocean Explorer. https://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov&gt;hotspots</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pedoja, K., et al. (2006) Plio-Quarternary Uplift of the Manta Peninsula and La Plata Island and the Subduction of the Carnegie Ridge, Central Coast of Ecuador. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 22, 1-21.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2006.08.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glynn, P.W. (1988) El Ni&amp;#241;o-Southern Oscillation 1982-1983: Nearshore Population, Community, and Ecosystem Responses. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 309-346.  
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.001521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fornari, D., et al. (2004) Submarine Lava Flow Emplacement at the East Pacific Rise 9&amp;#176;50'N: Implications for Uppermost Ocean Crust Stratigraphy and Hydrothermal Fluid Circulation. Geophysical Monography, 148, 187-218. https://doi.org/10.1029/148GM08</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2011) United States Geological Survey Volcano Hazards Program. 22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balzhiser, R.E., Samuels, M.R. and Eliassen, J.D. (1972) Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics: The Study of Energy, Entropy, and Equilibrium. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perkins, L. (2004) AURA/OMI Tropospheric Ozone on a Flat Map. Scientific Visualization Studio.  
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=3071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Penven, P., et al. (2005) Average Circulation, Seasonal Cycle, and Mesoscale Dynamics of the Peru Current System: A Modeling Approach. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002945</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cucalom, E. (1987) Oceanographic Variability off Ecuador Associated with an El Nino Event in 1982-1983. Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 14309-14322. https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC13p14309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IEA (2009) Greenhouse Gas R &amp; D Programme Assessment of Sub Sea Ecosystem Impacts. Technical Study Report No. 2008/8, IEA Environmental Projects Ltd.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Global CCS Institute (2015) 2.2 Natural Flux of Volcanic CO2 to Ocean Bottom Waters.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitchell, N.C. (2003) Susceptibility of Mid-Ocean Ridge Volcanic Islands and Seamounts to Large-Scale Landsliding. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 2397. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB001997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wadhams, P. (2016) The Global Impacts of Rapidly Disappearing Arctic Sea Ice. YaleEnvironmet360.  
https://e360.yale.edu/features/as_arctic_ocean_ice_disappears_global_ 
climate_impacts_intensify_wadhams</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, T.J. (2018) Mitigation of Ecuadorian Earthquake Impact. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 7, 195-219. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2018.73012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">New Species (2015) Woods Hole Oceanographic Galapagos Expedition Reveals Unknown Seamounts.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Struett, D. (2019) “Life-Threatening” Temperatures Hit Record Daily Low in Chicago. Chicago Sun Times.  
https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/chicago-breaks-daily-record-low-temperature-weather-service</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93403-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2019) Temperature Records, National Weather Service. Chicago.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>