All commercial chemicals were used without further purification. Terephthalic acid (H₂BDC, 99%), Ferric chloride hexahydrat (FeCl₃・6H₂O, 99%), ethanol (99.5%), sodium borohydride (NaBH₄), NaOH, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonicacid) diammonium salt (ABTS) were obtained from BBI (Ontario,Canada). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) experiments were conducted on a D/max-3B spectrometer with Cu Kα radiation. Scans were made in the 2^θ range 3˚ - 40˚ with a scan rate of 10˚ min⁻¹ (wide angle diffraction). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of samples were obtained with a FEI Quanta 200FEG microscope. BET surface areas and pore volumes were measured through nitrogen adsorption/desorption measurements using a Micromeritics Tristar II surface area and porosity analyzer.

The Fe-MIL-101 is synthesized by hydrothermal method using p-dibenzoic acid as ligand iron as metal active center [24]. FeCl₃・6H₂O (0.675 g) was added slowly into DMF (15 mL) solution, followed by adding H₂BDC (0.206 g). The mixture was under continuous mechanical stirring for 10 min at room temperature, and then transferred into a Teon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 110˚C for 20 h. The resulting brown solid was separated from the reaction medium, and purified by using the hot ethanol (70˚C), the purification process was carried out several times, followed by drying in an oven (70˚C, 30 min). The particles were separated by centrifuging and washed with DMF and ethanol to remove any unreacted raw materials.

FeCl₃・6H₂O (0.0195 g) and Fe-MIL-101 (0.4 g) were dissolved in ethanol, stirred at room temperature for 1 h, centrifuged and washed 3 times in ethanol and dried under vacuum at 80˚C to obtain the product 1. NaBH₄ (2 mL, 1.875 mg/mL) solution was added dropwise to the solution of product 1 (product 1:150 mg, ethanol: 10 mL, dichloromethane: 50 mL), stirred at 0˚C under nitrogen for 30 min and then stirred at room temperature for 30 min. The precipitate was collected by centrifuging to obtain the product 1% Fe/Fe-MIL-101.

3% Fe/Fe-MIL-101, 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101, and 8% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 were prepared by changing the amount of FeCl₃・6H₂O added.

The effect of pH, temperature, H₂O₂ concentration and ABTS concentration on the peroxidase-like activity of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was performed in a reaction volume of 3 mL of buffer solution. Buffers used in this experiment were acetate buffer (pH 4.0-6.0) and borate buffer (pH 8.0-10.0). The steady state kinetic assays of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 were carried out by changing the concentration of ABTS at a fixed concentration of H₂O₂ or vice versa at 50˚C. After 5 minutes of reaction, the absorbance of the reaction solution was measured at a wavelength of 420 nm using a Shi-madzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer. The kinetic parameters were calculated based on the equation:

ν = V max ( [ S ] / ( K m + [ S ] ) ) (1)

where ν is the initial velocity, V_max is the maximal velocity, [S] is the concentration of the substrate, and K_m is the Michaelis constant.

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-synthesized Fe-MIL-101 is shown in Figure 1(a). The diffraction peaks all corresponded to the products synthesized in the literature [24] and generally consistent with the pattern calculated from the crystallographic data in this reference. Moreover the diffraction peaks position of obtained Fe/Fe-MIL-101 by different iron loadings are the same as Fe-MIL-101, but the intensity of the diffraction peaks are weaker than

Fe-MIL-101. The adsorption?desorption isotherms of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 are of type I (Figure 1(b)), indicating the presence of a microporous network. Compared with Fe-MIL-101, the BET specific surface area of the experimentally synthesized 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 material decreased from 2737 m²/g to 2148 m²/g, and the pore volume decreased from 0.75 cm³・g⁻¹ to 0.51 cm³・g⁻¹, the average pore size decreased from 2.51 nm to 2.35 nm, the reduction of specific surface area, pore size and pore volume probably due to the blockage of material pores by the loaded iron. SEM images show that 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 has a typical octahedron morphology like Fe-MIL-101 (Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b)), but the surface is rough, and it is obvious that there are small solid iron particles on the surface. All of the results mentioned above confirmed that 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was successfully synthesized.

In order to study the peroxidase-like activity of 1% Fe/Fe-MIL-101, the conventional catalytic oxidation of the peroxidase substrate ABTS in the presence of H₂O₂ was tested. As shown in Figure 3, in the absence and presence of H₂O₂, which displayed a negligible absorption at the maximum absorbance of 420 nm, indicating that ABTS could not be oxidized by H₂O₂ without any catalysts. In contrast, 1%Fe/Fe-MIL-101 could catalyze the oxidation of ABTS by H₂O₂ (Figure 3), with a maximum absorbance at 420 nm, indicating that 1% Fe/Fe-MIL-10 gave higher response and showed catalytic activity toward ABTS oxidation in the presence of H₂O₂.

Table 1 mainly compares the absorbance values of Fe/Fe-MIL-101 with iron loadings at load ratios R = 0.01, R = 0.03 and R = 0.05, R = 0.08, respectively. A significant effect of the load ratio on the absorbance values is visible, the absorbance value are growing with increasing load ratio (R = 0.01 - 0.05), however, the absorbance value is decreasing when the load ratio is increased to 0.08. Since the absorbance value of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was the largest, 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was selected as the experimental object in the next experiment.

The peroxidase-like catalytic activity of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was studied by

selecting the substrates ABTS and H₂O₂ as a model reaction system. The peroxidase-like activity of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 was measured at different pH (3.0-9.0) and various temperature (30˚C - 50˚C) (Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b)). As can be seen from Figure 5, the pH 4.0 and 45˚C were the optimal reaction condition, which are very similar to the values for HRP [25].

We used steady-state kinetics to further study the peroxidase-like catalytic mechanism and kinetic parameters of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101. The kinetic data was collected by changing the concentration of one substrate at a fixed concentration of the other substrate. Within the concentration range of TMB and H₂O₂ used,

typical Michaelis-Menten curves were observed (Figure 5). A Lineweaver-Burk plot can be obtained with a nearly linear relationship (Figure 5(b) and Figure 5(d)), from which important kinetic parameters can be derived (Table 2). The kinetic parameters, such as the Michaelis-Menten constant (K_m) and maximum initial velocity (V_max) were from a Lineweaver-Burk plot. The Michaelis constant, K_m, the smaller the K_m value, the stronger the affinity of the enzyme to the substrate, and the higher the catalytic activity of the enzyme. As shown in Table 2, the K_m value of 5% Fe/Fe-MIL-101 (0.095 mM) with ABTS as the substrate under the optimum conditions (20 mM acetate buffer, pH 4.0) was about 3-fold

lower than HRP (0.319 mM) , and this value is about 108 times less than that of CuO NPs (K_m = 10.28 mM) and about 10-fold lower than Fe-MIL-101 (0.916 mM), indicating a much higher affinity for H₂O₂ than HRP and most of the peroxidase mimetics at pH 4.0.