Malaria is an infection of public health importance caused by the parasite of the genus Plasmodium. The species of the parasite causing human malaria in Nigeria are Plasmodium falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae and P. knowlesi. P. falciparum is the commonest, implicated in about 97% cases of uncomplicated malaria. It is also the species responsible for most of the severe forms of the disease in Nigeria [1] .

According to the World Malaria Report 2011, estimated 216 million cases of clinical malaria occurred in 2010 resulting in about 655,000 deaths across the globe. Of these deaths, 91% occurred in Africa [2] .

About 2.2 billion people are exposed to malaria every year out of which 300 to 500 million develop the disease. Unfortunately, there were 247 million cases of malaria in 2006, causing nearly 1 million deaths, mostly among African children [3] .

As a major public health problem in Nigeria malaria affects most pregnant women and children under the age of five. It impacts negatively on our economy with about 132 billion Naira loss to treatment and loss of man-hours. African leader’s commitment to fighting malaria gave birth to a commendable launching of the Roll Back Malaria initiative on April 25, 2000. One of the key strategies to malaria control is effective case management. In 2005, the National Malaria Treatment Policy recommended the use of Artemisinin based Combination Therapy. These medicines still remain the most efficacious antimalarial treatments available [1] . Continuous monitoring and evaluation of this regimen are essential to maintaining its effectiveness. This knowledge gap needs to be filled.

Unfortunately, the increasing prevalence of antimalarial drug resistance is a major threat to malaria control globally, especially in resource poor countries like Liberia. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended Artemisinin-based combination therapy for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in endemic countries. The rationale for the combination therapy is to improve the cure rate of malaria infections responding inadequately to monotherapy and possibly to prevent or delay the emergence of resistance strains [4] .

It was exactly in April 2001, that the WHO recommended the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria as well as ensured the highest cure rates and had the potential to reduce the spread of drug resistance [5] .

Artemether-lumefantrine therapy combines the benefits of a rapid short acting schizonticidal effect of artemether with a slower but longer acting schizonticidal effect of lumefantrine, a highly lipophilic aryl amino alcohol [6] [7] [8] .

It has been noted that a 3-day ACT’s treatment course exposes 2 asexual cycles thereby reducing the number of malaria parasites in the body by approximately one hundred million-fold. An important bonus of the artemisinin compounds is their gametocytocidal activity which helps reduce transmissibility as well as decrease malaria incidence in low-transmission settings [9] [10] .

To this end, Abdul and co concluded that to protect drug efficacy of AL, careful periodic monitoring of Artemether-lumefantrine combination therapy is essential to ensure pharmacologic effectiveness and safety in the management of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Liberia and could make a substantial contribution to malaria control generally [8] . This monitoring is lacking in most endemic regions creating a knowledge gap that need to be filled.

Malaria has varied non-specific symptoms including fever, chills, headache, muscular aching, weakness, vomiting, cough, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Other symptoms related to organ dysfunction may supervene, such as acute renal failure, pulmonary oedema, generalized convulsions, circulatory collapse, followed by coma and death. The initial symptoms can be mild, may not easily be linked to malaria [11] .

Despite the non-specific nature of these symptoms, they are the basis for the initial clinical diagnosis of malaria disease. Laboratory diagnosis comes later as confirmatory.

Many studies have reported disparities in the mean fever clearance time in malaria infected subjects. Abdul et al. in Liberia reported 19 hours in Africans as compared to about 28 hours in Asians. This duration is much less than the reports of 26 to 72 hours in other international studies assessing the same Arthermeter-Lumefantrine efficacy. The noted disparities in the two races above may be due to the partial immunity of individual’s resident in Africa resulting in early fever clearance [12] [13] .

However, it is recommended that individuals who experiences fever should immediately inform medical personnel for diagnosis and effective treatment. This may also hold in the case of the possible exposure to malaria infection. Falciparum malaria may be fatal if treatment is delayed beyond 24 h after the onset of clinical symptoms [11] .

In a study to addresses the therapeutic efficacy of ALC for the treatment of P. falciparum malaria in southwestern Ethiopia, Seleshi and co noted that monitoring drug efficacy in a 2-year interval is an important tool for establishing rational anti-malarial drug policies [14] . In that study, 74 (83.1%) of the study subjects achieved fever clearance by day 1, but 5 (5.6%) still had fever at day 2. All study subjects had no fever by day 3.

The study further stated that, ALC has been highly effective in the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria and reducing gametocyte carriage in southwestern Ethiopia years after its introduction in Ethiopia [14] .

Our duty in this research is to reappraise the need for drug monitoring for effectiveness using symptoms clearance following Arthermeter-Lumefantrine combination therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Elele, Rivers State Nigeria. Elele is a high malaria endemic area and its geographical map is represented in Figure 2 [15] .

The data gotten was analyzed, calculated to give the frequencies using SPSS 16.0 full version and Microsoft excel packages. The student t-test was used to calculate the P-value and values of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

A total of 100 malaria confirmed patients both men and women were enrolled for the study which revisited the evaluation of the effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine (ALC) combination in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Elele, Nigeria.

The awareness of the patients to malaria infection was noticed in 100 (100)% of the participating patients (as shown in Table 1).

The knowledge of the participants about the modes of transmission of malaria infection was 70%. A total of 70 patients identified mosquito bite as the mode of transmission. 10 patients (10%) each of the participants identified cold and excessive fatty food as the mode of malaria transmission. Hunger and dirty environment were identified by 7% and 3% of the participating patients respectively (as shown in Table 2).

From the study, the participant’s knowledge of antimalarial drugs which were as follows: Chloroquine 100%; fansidar 98%; quinine 88%; artesunate 62%; artesunate-amodiaquine 41% and artemether-lumefantrine 40% (as shown in Table 3).

While assessing the awareness of the participating patients to Artemisinin-based combination (ACT) antimalarial drugs it was found that, those aware of ACT’s were 50% while those not aware were also 50% (as shown in Table 4).

The types of ACT’s known among the patients and used in the past were as follows: Artesunate (AS)-amodiaquine (AQ) = 41%; Artemether (AM)-lumefantrine

(LU) = 40%, Artesunuate (AS)-Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine (SP) = 38%, Artesunuate (AS)-Mefloquine (MF) = 20% (see Table 5).

The pattern of symptoms the patients presented with on day 0 were as follows: fever 92%; body weakness 90%; headache 85%; malaise 80%; loss of appetite 80%; nausea 72%; vomiting 70%; abdominal pains 50% (as shown in Figure 1).

The pattern of symptoms the patients presented with on day 0 was presented in a table format for further clarification. Fever 92%; body weakness 90%; headache 85%; malaise 80%; loss of appetite 80%; nausea 72%, vomiting 70% and abdominal pains 50%. Others (not shown) were pallor 30%; hepatomegaly and splenomegaly 20% each; while chills and rigor were also 20% each (as shown in Table 6).

The interval between the disappearance of the presenting symptoms and commencement of treatment showed that by day 10 of therapy, fever, vomiting and abdominal pains had disappeared in all the 100 patients, some patients were still complaining of mild: body weakness 40%; headache 2%; malaise 24%; loss of appetite 20% and nausea 10%. By day 14, no symptoms were reported in any of the 100 patients. There was Effective clinical response (ECR) by day 14 of therapy (as shown in Table 7).

This in-vivo study has re-evaluated the effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine combination in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Elele, Nigeria. Although many studies have been conducted in different parts of the world on this topic, to our knowledge this is the only study which enrolled otherwise sick malaria diagnosed patients of both sexes irrespective of races and from 15 years of age. Perhaps also, it is the first study to have analyzed artemether lumefantrine combination effectiveness in this part of the world.

Awareness of the patients on malaria infection was very high as 100 (100)% of the patients were aware of malaria infection. Their knowledge of malaria infection compares to the outcome of a study carried out in the rural communities of Aliero, in Northern Nigeria in which 187 out of 200 respondents (93.5%) admitted been aware of malaria infection [16] .

A significant percentage of our participants demonstrated the correct knowledge of the mode of transmission of malaria infection 70 (70%) by identifying mosquito bite as the mode of malaria transmission, In our study, only 10% each identified cold and excessive fatty food as the mode of transmission. Hunger and dirty environment were identified by 7% and 3% of the patients respectively. Their knowledge of mode of malaria transmission is far better than obtained in the above study where only 22 (11.8%) respondents correctly stated that mosquitoe bite was the mode of malaria transmission [16] . However, our finding was consistent with another study in which 98.2% of the respondents reported mosquito bite as the cause of malaria. Though, in this quoted study, it wasn’t well stated whether it referred to the exact malaria cause or its transmission mode [17] . Still in another study, there was a comparable knowledge of mode of transmission, 66% of the study community related the mode of transmission to the bite of infective mosquitoes though only 43.7% of them believed that malaria could be transmitted from person to person through the bite of mosquitoes [18] .

From our study, we found out that the participants knowledge of antimalarial drugs which were as follows; Chloroquine 100%; fansidar 98%; quinine 88%; artesunate 62%; artesunate-amodiaquine 41% and artemether-lumefantrine 40%. However in another study by Dickson et al., it was reported that antimalarials commonly cited for malaria treatment were chloroquine (26.1%) and nivaquine (14.6%), analgesics; panadol (23%), and paracetamol (12.3%) including native drugs (6.3%) [19] . The high knowledge of Chloroquine (100%), fansidar (98%) and quinine (88%) in our study can be attributed to the fact that they were the foremost antimalarial drugs before the advent of Arthemisinin based therapies.

The finding above had revealed an existing gap in knowledge of arthemisinin combination therapies over seventeen years after WHO recommendation it for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria [6] [7] [8] . To close this gap studies like ours are needed for the continuous monitoring and evaluation of antimalarials especially ACT’s with a view to bettering malaria case management and limiting the emergence of antimalaria drug resistance.

On the various ACT’s known and used by this study community the following result was gotten: Artesunate (AS)-amodiaquine (AQ) = 41%; Artemether (AM)-lumefantrine (LU) = 40%, Artesunuate (AS)-Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine (SP) = 38%, Artesunuate (AS)-Mefloquine (MF) = 20%. The study by Wakgari in Ethiopia, identified modern anti malaria usage as follows: The use of modern drugs for malaria was high (92%) including chloroquine (73.5%) and Sulfadoxine-Pyremethamine (60.6%). In that study, chloroquine was believed to be effective for the treatment of malaria by 59% of the respondents, while the rest responded otherwise, ineffective [18] .

Several years after most malaria endemic countries adopted the use of ACT’s for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria; it is appalling that knowledge and practice of this medication has not reached the desired ebb even among some primary health care providers creating another research gap for exploitation. The Nigerian National Malaria Treatment Policy recommended the use of Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy in 2005, 13 years now [1] . In 2005, Cameroon also adopted ACT’s for malaria treatment, hence a change from chloroquine or amodiaquine monotherapy to artemisinin-based combination therapy (AS/AQ) [19] . While in Malawi Linda et al., reported that due to increased resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), the Ministry of Health, as in many sub-Saharan African countries, changed the malaria treatment policy to use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 2008 [20] .

In another study, Nduka et al. reported that 78% of their respondents were conversant with the ACT’s while 71% of them stock ACTs in their shops. These were Patent Medicine Vendors [21] . In the Malawian study above, most of the participants (95.7%) knew at least one form of ACT, 67.4% reported that different forms of ACT have different characteristics, 77.3% reported that there are special formulations for children. The most commonly mentioned ACT was artemether-lumefantrine (AL), by 94.6% of the participants and 75.0% of the participants indicated that they prefer to prescribe AL. 73.9% of participants had ever received information on ACT. However, only 31.5% had received training on management of malaria using ACT. There were 71.7% respondents who had heard of ACT causing side effects. Only 25.0% of the participants had received training on how to report SAEs. Again this is another research limitation requiring another study on the need to further train the patent medicine vendors on ACT’s use, prescription, side effects etc. [20] .

A study of the pattern of symptoms our patients presented with on day 0 showed that Fever was the most predominant presenting symptom 92%. It was closely followed by body weakness and headache at 90% and 85% respectively. Malaise 80%; loss of appetite 80%; nausea 72%, vomiting 70% and abdominal pains 50%. Others (not shown on Table 6) were pallor 30%; hepatomegaly and splenomegaly 20% each; while chills and rigor were also 20% each. Most studies analyzing malaria symptoms report fever as comparable to ours. In Ethiopia it was reported that majority (86.8%) of the respondents mentioned fever as a symptom of malaria [17] . Other reported symptoms: chills, headache, nausea/vomiting, loss of appetite and body/joint aches were pointed out by 77.3%, 64.8%, 46.7%, 40.8% and 31.5% of the respondents respectively as possible symptoms of malaria in the Ethiopian study. In another Ethiopian study, reports of fever clearance showed that 74 (83.1%) of the study subjects achieved fever clearance by day 1, but 5 (5.6%) still had fever at day 2. All study subjects had no fever by day 3 [14] . In one Northern Nigerian study, the most commonly mentioned symptom was fever with shivering by 122 respondents 65.2% [16] while in a Liberian study on malaria patients of both Asian and African races, fever was present in all subjects (100%) at the time of enrollment from. Other main symptoms were chills, vomiting and headache while Splenomegaly was the leading sign. Thrombocytopenia (less than 150 × 109/l) was present in 33% and 28% of subjects from Asian and African races respectively [8] . In Ethiopia, Fever, headaches, chills and shivering were the most frequently mentioned symptoms of malaria as reported 89.7%, 87.5% and 81.3% of the study subjects respectively [18] .

Since the emergence of some known malaria symptoms (though non specific) are a major reason for most patients to seek medical help, the disappearance of such symptoms also may usher in renewed complete health on those individual. Our patients presented to us with symptoms and signs suggestive of malaria on day 0 as above. For this reason, laboratory diagnosis was done to confirm our preliminary clinical diagnosis of malaria infection before recruitment. The disappearance of these symptoms were thus: on day 10 of therapy, fever, vomiting and abdominal pains had disappeared in all the 100 patients, some patients were still complaining of mild: body weakness 40%; headache 2%; malaise 24%; loss of appetite 20% and nausea 10%. By day 14, no symptoms were reported in any of the 100 patients. There was Effective clinical response (ECR) by day 14 of therapy.

A further statistical interpretation of the disappearance of malaria symptoms among our patients holds that by day 2 of therapy there was significant reduction of some symptoms: fever 52% (56.5) (p < 0.05); headache 70% (82.4) (p < 0.05); malaise 70% (87.5) (p < 0.05), nausea 60% (83.3) (p < 0.05); vomiting 36% (51.4) (p < 0.05); abdominal pain 22% (44.0) (p < 0.05). Significant reduction of some symptoms could only be achieved on day 4: body weakness 80% (88.9) (p < 0.05); loss of appetite 60% (75.0) (p < 0.05).

The relevance of p-value in this study has to do with ascertaining the points (particular day) at which a particular symptom disappearance achieved statistical significant difference, p < 0.05 when compared with its state at presentation on day 0. The disappearance of fever, headache and malaise were noted to be to be statistically significant on day 2 in all the participants (p < 0.05). By definition, the P value, or calculated probability, is the probability of finding the observed, or more extreme, results when the null hypothesis (H₀) of a study question is true – the definition of “extreme” depends on how the hypothesis is being tested. P is also described in terms of rejecting H₀ when it is actually true; however, it is not a direct probability of this state. However, most authors refer to statistically significant as P < 0.05 and statistically highly significant as P < 0.001, that is less than one in a thousand chance of being wrong [22] . A study on efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine in uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Liberia reported a mean fever clearance time in P. falciparum infected subjects of about 19 hours in Africans and 28 hours in Asians. The disparity in these two races may not be unconnected with a higher partial malaria immunity of individual’s resident in Africa that resulted in the early fever clearance. Also the duration is much less than that observed in some of the international studies assessing AL efficacy reported as 26 to 72 hours [8] [23] [24] . From our study, on day 6 of therapy all the patients, 100 (100%) declared that they were already cured (no major symptoms, full activity restored and already back to work and now healthy). This shows a 100% effectiveness/efficacy of the artemether/lumefantrine combination therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria

in Elele, in Rivers State, Nigeria. With the attainment of an Effective clinical response (ECR) by day 14 of therapy: we can deduce that artemether-lumefantrine combination therapy is 100% effective in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Elele Rivers State Nigeria, a high malaria endemic area. The geographical map/location of Elele in Nigeria, the study area is shown in Figure 2.

Artemether-lumefantrine combination therapy has been used in the effective management of uncomplicated malaria in Elele, Nigeria and is capable of making substantial contribution to malaria treatment and control programs. However, for this drug efficacy to be sustained as well as delay/prevent the emergence of resistance strains, continued periodic assessment, monitoring and evaluation of the efficacies and effectiveness of the component drugs especially in high malaria endemic areas need to be of utmost importance to health care providers.

We sincerely wish to thank our children and other family members of ours for their assistance in the course of this study. Our appreciation also goes to express our sincere thanks to our dear patients who volunteered to be part of this study. We also want to use this August medium to appreciate the doctors, midwives, nurses, lab technicians, home-visitors, cleaners, drivers, and logistical and administrative teams of Madonna University Teaching Hospital, Elele for all their assistance during the course of this study.

The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interests.

Chukwu, L.C., Agbasi, P.U., Unekwe, P.C. and Oguwike, F.N. (2019) Revisiting the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Artemether-Lumefantrine Combination in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in Elele, a Malaria Endemic Area in Rivers State Nigeria. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 7, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2019.76005