<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2019.106044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-93037</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Risk Assessment of Mediterranean Sea Waters on Cooling System of Nuclear Power Plant
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>S. Tawfik</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>F.</surname><given-names>S. Tawfik</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Siting &amp;amp; Environmental Department, NRRA, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>05</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>738</fpage><lpage>744</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The study evaluated the impacts such as corrosion and scale formation which may result from, using the once-through pass cooling system of a suggested nuclear power at different selected coastal regions of Alexandria coast. (Abu-Qir, Sidi Kerrir, Estern Harbour, El Max and Sidi Abd Elrhaman). The study had used The Langelier Saturation Index (LSI), which is a measure of a solution’s ability to dissolve or deposit calcium carbonate, which is often used as an indicator of the corrosivity of water. Like the Langelier saturation index, the Ryznar stability index (RSI) is also used to predicate the formation of scale and also the tendency for corrosion due to the concentration of calcium carbonate in the selected water system. Both of the two indexes ((LSI) and (RSI)) had been used to evaluate the internal environmental impact which may be occurred when used once-through pass system is as a cooling method of a coastal pressurized water reactor power plant. The study results showed that the calculated LSI and RSI values for selected regions indicated that, there was a low tendency for scale formation and possibility of corrosion at these selected study areas, so using nickel copper alloys in condenser is recommended to prevent any possibility of attack of corrosion besides the using of chemical treatment method of inlet cooling water system.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cooling Water</kwd><kwd> Corrosion</kwd><kwd> Langelier Saturation Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The consideration of new nuclear power stations is split into two phases. The first phase addresses generic design matters (namely, acceptability of candidate nuclear power station designs) and the second deals with site-specific applications for permits under the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010. Since a large nuclear power plant that utilizes a once-through cooling system may withdraw 800 million to 1 billion gallons of water a day, these plants are usually built next to rivers, lakes, or oceans. As the name implies, once-through cooling uses water per single time to cool and condense steam produced for electricity generation. Water produced from the condensed steam is reused in the generation process, but the water used for cooling is discharged back into the lake, river or ocean, with a temperature increase of up to 30 degrees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref1">1</xref>]. Condenser performance is also reduced by factors such as scale on the outside (steam side) of the tubes and by slime and scale (waterside fouling) inside. These effectively insulate the tube wall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref2">2</xref>]. The widely used Langelier Saturation Index is a useful indicator of carbonate scale formation but it is purely an equilibrium index and gives no indication of how much scale will form, or calcium carbonate will precipitate, in bringing the water to equilibrium. Scaling and corrosion are influenced by pH, hardness, alkalinity, total dissolved solids and temperature so in theory an equilibrium condition can be maintained so that neither occurs. Other problems like the water consumption caused by the evaporation losses of the towers are also the object of controversy at several sites (3). On the other hand using once-through cooling pass may solve some of these problems such as water consumption, which Egypt government is concerned with and the rejection of thermal discharges from cooling towers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref3">3</xref>]. Fouling risk is another environmental impact on nuclear power plant from using sea water as a cooling system, as it is classified as the deposition of marine biological organisms on certain surface called marine bio-fouling or classified as a deposition of chemical compounds such as calcium silicates and calcium carbonates, forming what is called chemical fouling; on the other hand fouling may also defined as (inorganic or organic) chemical formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref4">4</xref>]. The bio-fouling species attached ranged from micro-organisms (bacteria, algae) to macro-organisms (mussels, barnacles, etc.) and particulate fouling. The possibility of fouling formation in seawater medium is increasing due to the increasing of TDS, Alkalinity, salinity and Ca-hardness concentrations, leading to formation of hard insulating layer inside the condensed tubes that cause a problem in heat transfer process in the selected cooling water system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref7">7</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The coasts of Egypt extend over more than 3500 km along the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea. The Mediterranean Alexandria coastal sector extends further eastward from Hammam to Abu Qir. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts resulted from selecting certain sites at the coastal line of Alexandria to see the acceptability of using one of these sites to be used as source of once-through pass cooling system in a pressurized water reactor (PWR) with avoiding any environmental impacts on the suggested cooling water type,field study has been done to select the suggested sites (Abou-Qir, Sidi Kirr, Al Mex, Estern Harbour and Sidi Abd Elrahman), the Abou-Qir geographic coordinates are 31˚18'22.0''N 30˚09'52.0''E, while in Sidi Kirr are 31˚05'21.0''N 29˚35'29.0''E, and Al Mex coordinates with latitude 50.498830 and with longitude 3.611640. on the other hand, the Estern Harbour coordinates arelies between 29˚52'57''E - 29˚54'27''E and 31˚12'00''N - 31˚12'54''N, and Sidi Abd Elrahaman coordinates are 30˚57'59.99&quot;N 28˚43'59.99&quot;E. The Physic-chemical analysis of sea water parameters had been measured (temperature, pH, TDS , Alkalinity, Ca-hardness, and chlorides), volumetrically and gravimetrically, by using the standard methods for water and wastewater examination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref8">8</xref>] , Samples will be taken during six months, started from 2/1/1015 to 3/6/2015, this period help to study the seasonal variations occurred in the selected sites, showing the effects of temperature on pH and other physicochemical variations. Calculation of water saturation depends on measuring of many parameters such as, total alkalinity, pH, and calcium concentration of water. The solubility product leads to oversaturation with respect to CaCO<sub>3</sub> that leads to precipitation of CaCO<sub>3</sub>. Such water will exhibit a tendency to be scale forming. Where the solubility product Ksp is not exceeded the water is under saturated with respect to CaCO<sub>3</sub> and such a water, will tend to scale dissolving. The langlier sauation index ( LSI ) had been used for each site of the selected sites of the Alexandrian costal line, in order to evaluate the corrosion impact which may be occurred when using the once-through pass cooling water system as a cooling source of a pressurized nuclear reactor. In this study using mathematical model to control scale formation problem in suggested cooling water system. The steps of scales formation inside the condenser tubes are not found immediately after passing the supersaturated water through it. The Carbonate scale needs certain conditions to be formed, as it is not enough for the water to be super statured with CaCO<sub>3</sub> until nucleation has occurred. The carbonic species in water is defined by five basic parameters: H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, HCO 3 − , CO 3 2 − , OH<sup>−</sup> and H<sup>+</sup>. Carbon dioxide plays an important role in formation of the carbonic acid (weak acid) in marine water. As CO<sub>2</sub> enter the marine water through different pathways. The carbon dioxide dissolved into water exist not only dissolved CO<sub>2</sub> but also as carbonic acid, H<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, which is then dissociated to H<sup>+</sup> and HCO 3 − . The Langelier saturation index depends on the relation between saturated pH and measured pH in evaluation of water tendency in scale formation and acceptability to corrosion, which help in selection the suitable corrosion and scale formation inhibitor in order to avoid any risk in the selected condenser cooling system the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref9">9</xref>]. The Langelier saturation index = pH – pHs where, pH is the measured water pH and pHs is the pH where the water will be saturated (at equilibrium) with respect to CaCO<sub>3</sub>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref9">9</xref>]. Like the Langelier saturation index, the Ryznar stability index has its basis in the concept of saturation level. The Ryznar stability index depends in its evaluation on the relation between calcium carbonate and scale formation. The Ryznar index takes the form: Ryznar stability index = 2(pHs) – pH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref9">9</xref>]. Tendency of corrosion and scale formation inside the once-through cooling water system can be calculated by using <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Interpretation of Langlier saturation index (6)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quantity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scale forming but non corrosive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slightly Scale forming and Corrosive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Balanced but pitting corrosive possible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 - 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slightly corrosive but non scale forming</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5 - 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serious corrosion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5 to −2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Interpretation of Ryznar stability index (6)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Description</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Quantity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scale intolerable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy scale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light scale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Little scale or corrosion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corrosion significant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 7.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy corrosion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 - 9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corrosion intolerable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> showed that Al has the highest value of Langlier Saturation Index (LSI) in Estern harbor 1.78 while the lowest LSI value at Sidi Abd Elrhaman region with 1.12. On the other hand <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the highest value of Ryznar Stability Index (RSI) was found at Sidi Abd Elrhaman with 5.86 while the lowest RSI values found in Estern Harbor with 5.04, so depending on Langlier stability index or Ryznar stability index the selected sites for suggesting cooling system are with low tendency for scale formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref9">9</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that the calculated LSI values for selected regions are respectively (1.43, 1.58, 131, 1.78 and 1.12) and the calculated RS values are respectively (5.04, 5.24, 5.48, 5.04 and 5.86) all these values indicate that there low tendency for scale formation and possibility of corrosion at these selected areas as showed at <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> (0.5 - 2), On the other hand <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> showed that the degree of scale formation which is light scale (5 - 6) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93037-ref6">6</xref>]. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> showed also that There is ahighly significant t-test +ve correlations (P &lt; 0.01) between Ca-hardness and LSI value which is (+0.127) on the other hand <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> showed that there is There are highly significant t-test highly significance t-test +ve correlations (P &lt; 0.01) between Ca-hardness and RSI value (+0.333) as both LSI and RSI stability indexes have its basis in the concept of saturation level to quantify the relationship between calcium carbonate saturation state and scale formation. All these previous results may support the using of once-through cooling system at those selected sites (Abou-Qir, Sidi Kirr, Al Mex, Estern Harbour and Sidi Abd Elrhaman) as a source of nuclear power plant cooling water besides the using of anticorrosion chemicals in these selected sites</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The mean average values of physicochemical parameters analysis of the selected areas during the period 2/1/1015 to 3/6/2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abou-Qir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Kerir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Estern Harbour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EL max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Abd Elrhaman</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temp ˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >*pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37710</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca-hardness mg/l as CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alkalinity mg/l as CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorides mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19,678</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,880</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated pHs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated LSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated RSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.86</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*pH is not a average value.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation coefficient (r+) between LSI and Ca-hardness values of the selected areas during the period 2/1/1015 to 3/6/2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abou-Qir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Kerir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Estern Harbour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EL max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Abd Elrhaman</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated LSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+0.127</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca-hardness mg/l as CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1222</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T-test for significance of r+, P &lt; 0.001.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation coefficient (r+) between RSI and Ca-hardness values of the selected areas during the period 2/1/1015 to 3/6/2015</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Abou-Qir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Kerir</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Estern Harbour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EL max</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sidi Abd Elrhaman</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calculated LSI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >+0.333</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca-hardness mg/l as CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1222</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>T-test for significance of r+; P &lt; 0.001.</p><p>of cooling water with using nickel copper alloys in condenser material to prevent any attack of corrosion and at selected sites. On the other hand there are another protection methods in case of using once-through cooling system in once-through cooling power plants, such as Abou-Qir and Sidi Kerir steam power stations, like screens and debris filters with different diameters to prevent any debris and fouling accumulation beside the low degree of scale formation which may lead to the decreasing the efficiency of cooling that leads to negative impacts to nuclear power plants operation</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>− Using the once-through pass cooling system is a suitable cooling system of a suggested nuclear power for different selected coastal regions, of Alexandria coast (Abu-Qir, Sidi Kerrir, Estern Harbour, El Max and Sidi Abd Elrhaman) due to the decreases of its possibility of exposure to corrosion and scale formation impacts.</p><p>− The importance of using different corrosion and scale formation indexes (Langelier saturation index and Ryznar stability index) when suggesting a new cooling system of nuclear power plant especially when it is located at coastal area to avoid any environmental impacts may occur on the suggested cooling system.</p><p>− Using nickel-copper alloys in condenser prevents any possibility of attack of corrosion besides using pretreatment methods of cooling water (screens and debris filter) case of using once-through cooling system such as other coastal conventional steam power of Alexandria.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tawfik, M.S. and Tawfik, F.S. (2019) Risk Assessment of Mediterranean Sea Waters on Cooling System of Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Environmental Protection, 10, 738-744. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2019.106044</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.93037-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Union of Concerned Scientists (2011) Nuclear Power and Water. Fact Sheet, UCS, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turnpenny, A.W.H., Coughlan, J., Ng, B., Crews, P., Bamber, R.N. and Rowles, P. (2010) Cooling Water Operation for New Generation of Nuclear Power Stations in the UK. Water Side Drive, Environment Agency, Rio House.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bogh, P. and Bhargava, N. (1974) Combined Dr Y/Wet-Cooling Towers: Their Environmental Promise and Their Problems. Report, IAEA-SH-187/44, International Atomic Energy Authority, 45-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawkes, J.M. (2004) The Simulation and Study of Conditions Leading to Axial Offset Anomaly in Pressurized Water Reactors. Georgia Institute of Technology Master of Science Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bott, T.R. (1995) Heat Exchanger Cleaning. Fouling of Heat Exchangers (Chemical Engineering Monographs), 26, 357-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044482186-7/50017-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdosalehi, E., Banegad, H. and Zare Abyaneh, H. (2009) Conceptual Consideration Concerning water quality of Gezel-Ozan River in Iran. Thirtheenth International Water Technology Conference (IWTC), Hurghada, 12-15 March 209, 333-342.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Saharty, A.A. (2013) Radioactive Survey of Coastal Water and Sediments across Alexandria and Rashid Coasts. The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 39, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2013.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA, AWWA and WPCF (1995) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93037-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Water Cycle (1999) Predictive Modeling of Scale, Corrosion, &amp; Inhibitor Dosages French Creek for Cooling Water. Copyright French Creek Software, Inc., Kimberton.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>