<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1105459</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-93007</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical Characterization of Some Malagasy Rice Varieties. Relationship between Digestibility and Weevil Attack
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rasoazanakolona</surname><given-names>Voahanginirina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Technological Researches Department, National Center Applied for Rural Development, Antananarivo, Madagascar</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>06</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Alkali digestibility and gel consistency of a few Malagasy rice varieties have been studied. As regard the alkali digestibility, results show three types of vari-eties: respectively varieties with low, medium and high alkal
  i digestibility. Homogeneous translucent milled varieties are found to have a long time of un-changeableness at storage (more than two years): they were most of the im-proved irrigated rice. They agreed with low alkali digestibility (score 2 to 3) and they were difficult to be attacked by weevil. Most of the rainfed rice varieties were of intermediate alkali digestibility (score 3 to 5), and they have a semi-translucent caryopsis. High alkali digestibility (score 5.5 to 7) was among heterogeneous caryopsis rice (white belly rice, cracked rice, structured paddy). They are even though in the class of rice easy to cook on culinary considera-tion. They were remarkably easy to be attacked by weevils or fungi. Hybrid 885 retained water in the slot and was breakable as example. About gel con-sistency, most of the varieties were of hard gel consistency (score less than 40 mm). The low gel consistency (score more than 60 mm) was found with par-boiled rice varieties and some varieties such as 27 GM, 28 GM, Manjamena, which reflects a good culinary quality: tenderness longtime after cooking and cooling. In every case, varieties with a low gel consistency and easy to cook are highly sought varieties by urban consumers.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Alkali Digestibility</kwd><kwd> Gel Consistency</kwd><kwd> Structured Paddy</kwd><kwd> Fungi</kwd><kwd> Weevil</kwd><kwd>  Homogeneous</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>This study allows identifying the quick cooking rice varieties in selected varieties and those with soft consistency during cooling after being dry cooked.</p><p>Digestibility in alkali, and gel consistency are two significant characteristics in determining cooking quality of rice. The quick cooking rice has a major role to the burning issue of fuel economy. The soft gel consistency of rice is little known in Madagascar, although expressing the most appreciated quality of cooked rice tender after cooking, by urban consumers.</p><p>Beside these characterizations, our parallel studies have shown relationship between caryopsis tenderness and insect attack on milled rice, but also between fungal attack and furrowed or structured paddy. There was vulnerability of certain varieties to biodegradation: easy attack by weevils or fungi. To identify these two types of relationship, our experience was based on the determination of the alkali digestibility and physical observation of caryopsis grains.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. For Alkali Digestibility Test</title><p>- Milled rice varieties from traditional and improved varieties were used:</p><p>・ Irrigated varieties: MR10734.7.2, MR10734 (Madera), MR10214, MR10253 (Marisika), MR10244 1.2.3, 1.1.1 MR10218, Mahasarika, X265 (Mailaka), 2067, X398 (Tsiresindrano), X372 (Kelimirefaka), X360 (Mahadigny), ON333 (Soafitsanga), Tox V5 (Vesainky), X1816 (FRX 92F3B-14F4BF6), X1818 (FRX 92F3B-6F4BF6), X1832 (IR 70422-99-1-5), X1833 (IR 70423-170-2-3), X1834 (IR 70444-87-2-1), X1842 (RPSC148), Basmati 370, Soameva, hybrid 914, 879 hybrid, hybrid 885, 27GM, 28GM, 18Br,Rojofotsy, Manjamena.</p><p>・ Rainfed varieties: FOFIFA63, FOFIFA133 (Kanto), FOFIFA152 (Meva), FOFIFA153, FOFIFA157 (Malaky), FOFIFA159 (Mahasoa).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. For Gel Consistency</title><p>- Rrigated varieties: Soameva, ON333 (Soafitsanga), X265 (Mailaka), X372 (Kelimirefaka), X360 (Mahadigny), ToxV5 (Vesainky), 27 GM, 28 GM, 18 BR, Rojofotsy, short and sticky rice Tsipala, plain Rojomena, parboiled Rojomena, plain Manjamena.</p><p>- Rainfed varieties: Varieties: plain FOFIFA159 (Mahasoa), parboiled FOFIFA 159 (Mahasoa), 4129 (Meva), FOFIFA157 (Malaky), plain FOFIFA172, parboiled FOFIFA172.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Method</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Alkali Digestibility Test</title><p>The test (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) gives rice caryopsis hardness and its gelatinization temperature. The value was obtained from rice grains (N = 6) soaked in 10 ml of potassium hydroxide 1.7 (w/v) during 23 h at 30˚C in triplicates. Variation was observed with the naked eye according to the following scores [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref1">1</xref>] : 1 = unaffected grain, low alkali value; 2 = swollen grain, low alkali value; 3 = swollen grain, with narrow incomplete collar, intermediate alkali value; 4 = swollen grain with wide complete collar, intermediate alkali value; 5 = split grain with complete collar, intermediate to high alkali value; 6 = dispersed grain merging with collar, high alkali value; 7= completely dispersed and intermingled grain, high alkali value. Lower scores correspond to harder grains. When gelatinization temperature is low [55˚C - 69.50˚C], this agrees with high alkali value (score 6 or 7), the grains are soft. The next scale is [70˚C, 74˚C] for intermediate and [74.5˚C, 80˚C] for high gelatinization temperature which corresponds to hard grains.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Gel Consistency</title><p>The gel consistency was defined by the length of cold gel in a horizontally held test tube for one hour. This was obtained from 100 mg of thin 60 mesh flour put in a test tube 13 &#215; 100 mm, added with 2 ml of 0.2N aqueous potassium and some drops of thymol blue. A glass marble with the test tube width was used to</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Degree of digestion</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of digestion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alkali digestibility</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Score</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Figures</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unaffected grain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swollen grain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swollen grain, with narrow incomplete collar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swollen grain with wide complete collar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Split grain with complete collar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate to high</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dispersed grain merging with collar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Completely dispersed and intermingled grain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/93007x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>cover the solution. The whole was boiled during 8 minutes, and then cooled in an ice bath during 10 minutes before laying the test tubes on millimeter paper.</p><p>The values were classified as follow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref3">3</xref>] : L &gt; 61 mm, soft consistency; 60 &gt; L &gt; 41 mm: medium consistency; L &lt; 40 mm: hard consistency.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Alkali Digestibility</title><p>Alkali digestibility reflects the tenderness of the caryopsis and its easiness to cook. The grains may be speedy or long to cook according to the strength of alkali digestibility. Our test showed a strong alkali digestibility with Marisika, Vesainky, 2067, hybrid 885, Mahasoa (greater than 5): grains were split with a comprehensive and broad collar; their gelatinization temperature is therefore low. These varieties were easy to cook.</p><p>Alkali Digestibility was found average with MR10244 1.2.3, MR10218 1.1.1, Mahasarika, hybrid 879, hybrid 914, Malaky, Kelimirefaka, FOFIFA153, Meva, FOFIFA63, Rojofotsy, (observed values between 4.70 and 3.70): grains swollen with wide complete collar. Most of rainfed analyzed varieties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) were noticed in this average digestibility (average values = 4.03), except the variety Mahasoa (score 5.87). Their pasting temperature was in the intermediate value.</p><p>Regarding to irrigated varieties, we remarked that the caryopsis were homogeneous translucent. Their milled rice benefited to sustainable conservation according to our experiment (more than 2 years). These were: Mahadigny, Tsiresindrano, X1816 (FRX 92F3B-14F4BF6), X1818 (FRX 92F3B-6F4BF6), X1832 (IR 70422-99-1-5), X1834 (IR 70444-87-2-1), X1842 (RPSC148), Soafitsanga, Madera, MR10214, Mailaka; their alkali digestibility was low (2 to 3.17): (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>),</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Rainfed rice alkali digestibility</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF63</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF133</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF152</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF153</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF157</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FFF159</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Irrigated rice alkali digestibility</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M734.7.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M734</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M214</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M253</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M244 1.2.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >M218 1.1.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MHSRK</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X265</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2067</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X398</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X372</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><caption><title> (c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X360</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ON333</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tox V5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1816</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1818</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1832</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1833</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1834</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X1842</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Basm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RJF</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soameva</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_3"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hybr.914</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hybr.879</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hybr.885</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >27GM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >28GM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >18Br</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MjM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RJM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A.D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>therefore, they were with a high gelatinization temperature. These varieties were longer to cook too.</p><p>Interpretation</p><p>The general tendency of the digestibility values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) on the analyzed whitened rice was the intermediate digestibility (score 3 to 5). Few varieties were of high digestibility (score 5.83). The noted results confirmed the proportionality between the digestibility and the homogeneity of the caryopsis: when the rice caryopsis was homogenous, the digestibility with the potassium hydroxide solution 1.7% was weak (score 2 to 3); this fact made the rice sample in good state for much time storage. In the opposite, the heterogeneity gave high digestibility of the rice caryopsis (5 to 7). That referred to varieties difficult to preserve (weevil attack, broken rice, wet rice…). The digestibility was an indicator of the quality to storage of the whitened rice, and of the full rice grain also.</p><p>On the culinary option, the high digestibility of the rice caryopsis however meant that it was interesting in being quickly cooked. On the other side the homogeneous rice caryopsis was proved to give firm and elongated caryopsis on cooking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref3">3</xref>] . So the alkali digestibility also provided an indirect index on the cooking and eating quality, similarly to the results obtained by Chemutai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Gel Consistency</title><p>The advantage of the gel consistency is to get information about the quality of the cooked rice after cooling. Generally, a hard gel consistency variety hardened after being cooked.</p><p>Soameva, Soafitsanga, Malaky, Meva, X265 (Mailaka), X372 (KELIMIREFAKA), X360 (Mahadigny), Basmati 370, Tox V5 (Vesainky), short size Tsipala, FOFIFA 157 (Malaky) were found in this case. Their average values were 30 mm to 40 mm.</p><p>The major values were inferior to 60 mm as seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. So most of the analyzed Malagasy rice varieties were of hard gel consistency; they hardened after cooking and cooling. Some varieties however were exceptions such as those from the Middle-East (27 GM, 28 GM, 18 BR: average value 83 mm), the red improved rice Manjamena (82 mm), the traditional rice Rojomena (65 mm), the traditional sticky rice Tsipala from the North-East (92 mm).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Irrigated rice gel consistency</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Varie-ty</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soam</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ON333</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X265</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X372</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X360</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Basm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ToxV5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RJF</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ShTspl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SticTspl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pl Rjm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >parbRjm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pl Mjm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >27 GM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >28 GM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >18 Br</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G.C. mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Rainfed rice gel consistency</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pl F159</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parb F159</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4129</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F157</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pl F172</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parb F172</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G.C. mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>On the other side, the parboiled rice varieties (parboiled Rojomena, parboiled FOFIFA 159, and parboiled FOFIFA 172) gave an ameliorating cooking and eating quality according to our determination; their gel consistency became at least medium (score value: 70 mm - 60 mm). Parboiled rice got elsewhere enrichment of nutritional values (minerals, proteins, fibers) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Interpretation</p><p>The medium gel consistency (60 mm - 65 mm) of the traditional varieties such as Rojomena and Rojofotsy was a value that would seem to explain the good taste of numerous traditional rice during the sensorial analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref9">9</xref>] . Much more, the varieties 27 GM, 28 GM, 18 Br and Manjamena having values between 60 mm to 95 mm, were tasty and showed remarkably tender cooked rice after cooling. The Manjamena red variety within its soft gel consistency (value reaching 82 mm), confirmed its interest on culinary and nutritional point of view [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref5">5</xref>] . The parboiled varieties (Mahasoa, FOFIFA 172, Rojomena) gave a flow of medium to soft gel consistency (60 mm to 82 mm). This fact confirmed the improvement obtained in the cooking quality of parboiled varieties; the cooled rice after cooking was expected fairly to have moderate or low hardening.</p><p>The soft and medium gel consistency varieties were then interesting index on the culinary aspect and were characterizing elite rice to be developed. Especially when the amylose content was high (≥24%), the soft gel consistency softened the cooked and cooled rice.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Relationship between the Caryopsis Tenderness and Their Attack by Insects</title><p>We have found three types of cultivars according their alkali digestibility: low alkali digestibility rice of score 2 to 3 (most of the irrigated and aromatic rice varieties), intermediate alkali digestibility rice with score 3 to 5 (the rainfed rice varieties, the hybrids and the Middle East rice varieties) and high alkali digestibility rice with score near to 6 till 7 (improved rice as Manjamena, 2067, Vesainky, and defective varieties of rice). The high alkali digestibility generally gave tender caryopsis which implies an easy attack by weevils; the low alkali digestibility was found among aromatic and irrigated varieties which were characterized by totally homogeneous translucency caryopsis, difficult to be attacked by weevils and the intermediate alkali digestibility divided into two groups: the first group was the rainfed varieties and some irrigated ones, which were white belly but possessed homogenous shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), and the second ones were the hybrids with furrowed paddy which owned defective shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>There was easy weevil attack on the milled rice from grain of our following varieties which were of intermediate to high alkali digestibility: Mahasoa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref10">10</xref>] , Marisika [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref10">10</xref>] , 2067, Vesainky (alkali value average was 5.42). These varieties showed faulty feature: white belly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: hybrid 914), cracked caryopsis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: Marisika), wet caryopsis, furrowed caryopsis, structured paddy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: hybrid 879).</p><p>But when alkali digestibility of milled grains was low, we noted more sustainable storage, they were not infected by weevils: Mahadigny, Tsiresindrano, X1816 (FRX 92F3B-14F4BF6), X1818 (FRX 92F3B-6F4BF6), X1832 (IR 70422-99-1-5), X1834 (IR 70444-87-2-1), X1842 (RPSC148), Soafitsanga, Madera, MR10214, Mailaka. These were generally aromatic varieties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.93007-ref11">11</xref>] with totally translucent grain.</p><p>Homogeneity of grain translucency is a criterion of stability and sustainability in the endurance to diseases, to weevils, to broken rice. This gives the rice a superior physico-chemical, nutritive and culinary quality.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Varieties with a Furrowed Structure</title><p>Alkali digestibility of the hybrids 914, 885 and 879 was medium to fairly high (3.70 to 5.83). That meant the caryopsis could be caught by external damages such as weevils, broken rice (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: Marisika), fungi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: Manjopiaka), when the alkali digestibility is near to high (5.83 for Mahasoa, as example).</p><p>The hybrid varieties were examples of cultivars with grooved structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: paddy). Paddy was visibly furrowed. The risk of deterioration occurred at a moisture grabbing the paddy. The acute grooves retained water and caused mold growth that embedded in the grain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>: Manjopiaka); consequently, they reduced the whole-grain yield and increased the chip rate; the molds contaminated the grain at the same time. The hybrid 885 was highly noted susceptible to fungi and mold was on the outer layer of paddy.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusions</title><p>Quick cooking varieties and soft gel consistency are very popular, and have their interest in our urban countries. Varieties with furrowed structure also benefit from being known for orientation of their growing area rather in dry zone.</p><p>As storage case, for water content 12% of the grain, two types of varieties have been found: those of a high translucency and a homogenous caryopsis, rice which was more interesting to preserve; this rice grain was characterized by a fairly weak alkali digestibility. The other type was characterized by heterogeneity of the caryopsis (white belly) or paddy (grooves presence). According to the case, that one could not stand up to damages: weevils, fungi or breaking, especially with a strong alkali digestibility more than 5.5 in the majority.</p><p>Our observation and experiences confirmed that homogeneity traduced an endurance of the variety to damages, and heterogeneity its easiness to deterioration. The alkali digestibility also expressed the degree of endurance of varieties to external damages as above.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Voahanginirina, R. (2019) Physico-Chemical Characterization of Some Malagasy Rice Varieties. Relationship between Digestibility and Weevil Attack. Open Access Library Journal, 6: e5459. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105459</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Abbreviation Used for Varieties</title><p>M734.7.2: MR10734 7.2</p><p>M214: MR10214</p><p>M253: MR10253</p><p>M244: MR10244</p><p>M218 1.1.1: MR10218 1.1.1</p><p>MHSRK: Mahasarika</p><p>Basm: Basmati</p><p>RJF: Rojofotsy</p><p>Hybr.: Hybrid</p><p>MjM: Manjamena</p><p>FFF: FOFIFA</p><p>Soam: Soameva</p><p>Sh.Tspl: shortTsipala</p><p>Stic.Tspl: stickyTsipala</p><p>Pl.Rjm: Plain Rojomena</p><p>Parb.Rjm: parboiled Rojomena</p><p>Pl.Mjm: plain Manjamena</p><p>Pl.F.159: Plain FOFIFA159</p><p>Parb.F159: parboiled FOFIFA159</p><p>F157: FOFIFA157</p><p>Pl.F172: plain FOFIFA172</p><p>Parb.172: parboiled FOFIFA172</p><p>A.D.: alkali digestibility</p><p>G.C.: gel consistency</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.93007-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biswas, S.K. and Juliano, B.O. (1988) Laboratory Parboiling Procedures and Properties of Parboiled Rice from Varieties Differing in Starch Properties. Cereal Chemistry, 65, 417-423.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, S.X., Khush, G.S. and Juliano, B.O. (1991) Genetics of Gel Con-sistency in Rice. Indian Journal of Genetics, 101, 823-829.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De La Cruz, N.M. (1996) IRRI, Rice Quality Testing. Plant Breeding Department, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, 45 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chemutai, L.R., Musyoki, M.A., Kioko, W.F., Murira, K.G. and Piero, N.M. (2016) Physicochemical Characterization of Selected Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Genotypes Based on Gel Consistency and Alkali Digestion. Biochemistry and Analytical Biochemistry, 5, 285. https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1009.1000285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasoazanakolona, V. (2015) Improvement on the Nutritional and Technological Quality of Some Rice Varieties by Parboiling. Activity Report, Technological Research Department, National Center Applied for Rural Development.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campos, F.G. and Logullo Waitzberg, A.G. (2005) Diet and Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence for Etiology and Prevention. Nutriciòn Hospitalaria, 20, 18-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, M.T. and Hord, N.G. (2005) The Role of Dietary Factors in Cancer Prevention: Beyond Fruits and Vegetables. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 20, 451-459.https://doi.org/10.1177/0115426505020004451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lawin, G. (2006) Analyse des déterminants de l’adoption et de la diffusion du dispositif amélioré d’étuvage du riz dans la commune de Glazoue. Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Dipl?me d’Ingénieur Agronome Option, Economie, Socio-Anthropologie et Communication. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasoazanakolona, V. (2005) Organoleptical Analysis on Rice Varieties. Activities Report, Technological Research Department, National Center Applied for Rural Develop-ment.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voahanginirina, R. (2018) Influence of the Use of Capsaicin on the Storage of Rice Grain. Open Access Library Journal, 5, e4833.https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1104833</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.93007-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharp, R.N. (1986) Quality Evaluation of Milled Aromatic Rice from India, Thailand, and the United States. Journal of Food Science, 51, 633-636.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13897.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>