<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2019.106056</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-92999</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Turmeric and Vitamin E on the Performance and Quality of Eggs from White Layers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christine</surname><given-names>Laganá</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Erika</surname><given-names>S. P. Braga Saldanha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Roberto Sartori</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elisabeth</surname><given-names>Gonzales</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Renato</surname><given-names>Luis Luciano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Greice</surname><given-names>Zanatta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vitor</surname><given-names>Barbosa Fascina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios, Polo Regional do Leste Paulista and UPD Brotas, Secretariat of Agriculture and Supply to the State of S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo (SAA), Monte Alegre do Sul, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Advanced Center for Poultry Agribusiness Technological Research of the Biological Institute (SAA), Descalvado, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, State University of S&amp;amp;#227;o Paulo, Botucatu Campus, Botucatu, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>06</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>720</fpage><lpage>726</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A 112-day experiment was conducted to evaluate turmeric and vitamin E levels on the productive performance and quality of hen eggs. A total of 432 20-week-old white layers were used, distributed in an entirely randomized design, in a 4 &#215; 3 factor scheme (turmeric extract levels and vitamin E levels), with 6 repetitions of 6 birds per cage. The treatments consisted of four levels of turmeric extract inclusion (0; 0.1; 0.2 and 0.3) and three levels of vitamin E inclusion (0; 50 and 100 IU/kg). Egg quality was evaluated at each 28-day cycle through the variables specific gravity, yolk percentage, albumen percentage, shell percentage and thickness, Haugh unit, yolk index and staining, and production performance: weight, egg production and mass, feed intake, feed conversion (kg/kg; kg/dz), and mortality. The addition of vitamin E alone worsened feed intake, egg weight and feed conversion of layers. Turmeric added to 100 IU of Vit E improved egg mass indices, Haugh Unit and yolk index and intensified yolk staining. The amount of turmeric used in this experiment was not sufficient to improve the performance or egg quality of the birds.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Plant Extracts</kwd><kwd> Productive Performance</kwd><kwd> Phytogenic Additives</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the commercial posture chain, a great diversity of production systems is found to meet the needs of the market, since the consumer has become increasingly aware of the importance of the relationship between diet and health, which has encouraged researchers and the food industry to develop products enriched with nutrients capable of producing beneficial effects on health.</p><p>There has been progress in research aimed at including viable alternative products, such as plant extracts and vitamins, in the diet of layers, which have been shown to have antimicrobial and antioxidant action and promote improvements in animal performance.</p><p>Curcumin, the main bioactive component of saffron, has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, hepatoprotective, antiviral, anti-carcinogenic and hypolipidemic effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref1">1</xref>] . Due to its biological properties, saffron presents itself as a potential substitute for antibiotics that promote growth.</p><p>The knowledge and understanding of the levels of incorporation of natural antioxidants in layer feed, as well as the reaction mechanisms and control forms for them, are of great economic importance for the food industry.</p><p>The objective was to evaluate the effect of turmeric powder and vitamin E levels on the performance and quality of eggs from light white layers at 20 weeks.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>A total of 432 light layers, Hissex White line 20 weeks old, housed in production cages (100 cm long, 45 cm high and 45 cm deep) with independent front feeders and nipple drinkers were used. The light program adopted was 17 hours daily.</p><p>The experimental design was entirely randomized, in a 4 &#215; 3 factorial (turmeric levels &#215; vitamin E levels), totaling twelve combinations with 6 repetitions of 6 birds each. The treatments consisted of four levels of turmeric rhizome powder inclusion (0; 0.1; 0.2 and 0.3) and three levels of vitamin E inclusion (0; 50 and 100 IU/kg) mixed with a basal ration. The birds received water and feed at will during the entire experimental period, which was composed of four cycles of 28 days each. All rations used were isoenergetic, isoproteic and isoaminoacidic, formulated based on corn, soybean meal and wheat according to the nutritional recommendations proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref2">2</xref>] for the laying phase and differed only in relation to the addition of supplementary vitamin E and turmeric extract.</p><p>The maximum and minimum temperatures were measured with the help of a mini data logger located in a central point of the aviary and were recorded daily at 8 o’clock. The mean temperatures were 22.37˚C &#177; 2.73˚C and 15.22˚C &#177; 4.98˚C for maximum and minimum, respectively. Daily mortality data and the number of whole and broken eggs collected were recorded in a proper form. The birds were fed twice a day and during the day the feeders were homogenized several times.</p><p>Feed intake (g/bird/day), feed conversion (kg/dz), daily egg production (%/bird/day), mean egg weight (g), egg mass (g/bird/day) and egg mass conversion (kg/kg) were evaluated. At the end of each trial period, the quality of the eggs was assessed by breaking two eggs from each plot. Each egg was weighed individually to record yolk and albumen weights. Specific gravity; percentage of yolk, albumen and shell; thickness of shell; Haugh Unit; yolk index and yolk staining through the colorimetric range were verified. Then, the shells were dried in drying ovens at 105˚C for 3 hours and weighed to determine the weight and percentage of the shell.</p><p>The results were tabulated and analyzed by analysis of variance (ANAVA) of the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure with the help of the SAS statistical program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref3">3</xref>] and when significant, the means between treatments were compared by the Tukey test at 5% probability.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Performance</title><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref4">4</xref>] concluded in their study that egg production increased (P &lt; 0.05) with the addition of turmeric powder to laying hen diets. According to the authors, turmeric can improve the performance of the digestive tract in laying hens, resulting in improved egg production. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref5">5</xref>] showed that turmeric affected egg production, but not egg weight.</p><p>In this study, regardless of the addition of turmeric to the feed, in relation to the control group not supplemented, a negative effect of the addition of vitamin E in 100 IU/kg of feed was observed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) on feed intake, egg weight and feed conversion. Lower feed intake was attributed to the detrimental effect of extra vitamin E supplementation on egg weight and feed conversion results. However, the inclusion of vitamin E in the 50 IU/kg feed did not affect the results of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of turmeric levels (0; 0.1%; 0.2% and 0.3%) and vitamin E (0; 50 and 100 IU/kg) on the performance of 20-week-old light white layers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >vitamin E (IU/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >feed intake (g/bird/day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >egg production (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >egg weight (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >egg mass (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >feed conversion ratio (kg feed/dozen egg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >feed conversion ratio (g feed/g egg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >viability (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >96.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.85A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.98AB</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.07A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.57B</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >97.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.90B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >turmeric (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >97.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >96.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >96.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vitamin E</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.209</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >turmeric</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.719</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.505</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.547</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vit E x turmeric</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >n.s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.s.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed with different letters on the line differ from each other by the Tukey test (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>these variables when compared to the negative control. Excess vitamin E in the feed may have caused saturation in the intestinal absorption mechanisms resulting in low feed efficiency.</p><p>For the variable egg mass, there was significant interaction of vitamin E vs. turmeric supplementation, obtaining the worst results when 100 IU/kg of vitamin E was added at any level of turmeric inclusion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Although not significantly different from control (P &gt; 0.05), the lower egg mass result with 100 IU/kg supplementation of vitamin E suggests that the negative effect was exacerbated when turmeric was added. This phytogen has in its composition substances with antioxidant action similar to vitamin E, causing, perhaps, a typical toxicity situation of excess intake of fat-soluble vitamins.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref6">6</xref>] observed that the addition of extra vitamin E and turmeric supplementation to layer feed did not affect the performance of layers. But there was a significant improvement in intake when the feed was added only with l% turmeric. In the present study, the highest level of turmeric used was 0.3%, 70% lower than that reported by the cited authors. Therefore, the turmeric levels used here, regardless of the inclusion of vitamin E, were considered insufficient to obtain positive results similar to those reported by the authors. However, the association of 100 IU/kg of vitamin E with low levels of turmeric inclusion (0.1% to 0.3%) was considered inadequate for laying hens because it impairs egg mass.</p><p>When subjected to heat stress, laying hens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref7">7</xref>] and quails [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref9">9</xref>] supplemented with 250 mg/Kg of vitamin E presented adverse effects of stress on egg production and mass. In the same context, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref10">10</xref>] supplemented the layer feed with 60 IU vitamin E and observed positive effects on feed intake and egg production. It is therefore assumed that only under stressful conditions is extra vitamin E supplementation beneficial and necessary.</p><p>Regarding the supplementation of turmeric extract, regardless of the inclusion of vitamin E, no effect was observed on the performance of laying hens at peak posture.</p><p>The absence of significant influence of phytogenic sources of antioxidants (annato, turmeric, oregano) on the performance of layers is a fact already proven in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Interaction of levels of turmeric powder (0; 0.1; 0. 2 and 0.3%) and vitamin E (0; 50 and 100 IU/kg) for the variable egg mass of white commercial layers at 20 weeks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >vitamin E (IU/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >turmeric (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Egg Mass (g)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.52A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.75A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.72A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.56A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.49AB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.55A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.57B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.87B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.45B</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Upper case letters in the column and lower case letters in the row differ from each other by Tukey’s test (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>However, for broilers, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref13">13</xref>] observed an improvement in performance when they supplemented 0.50% of turmeric to the baseline diet. The authors attributed this effect to the presence of active compounds of turmeric that stimulate the antioxidant activity and the synthesis of proteins of the enzymatic system of the bird.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Egg Quality</title><p>No significant difference was observed between the treatments regarding the specific gravity of the eggs and the percentages of yolk, albumen and shell. However, considering the isolated effect of vitamin E, the values of Haugh unit (HU) and yolk index (YI) differed significantly (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The eggs of the birds fed with the feed with the highest level of vitamin E presented the best results of HU and YI than the other treatments that did not differ significantly from each other. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref10">10</xref>] did not observe significant changes in the yolk index, regardless of the thermal stress applied or the level of vitamin E supplementation, however the authors stated that 60 and 120 IU of vitamin E / kg of feed for birds exposed to heat stress was sufficient to improve the Haugh units to a level similar to that of birds supplemented with 20 IU of vitamin E / kg of feed in thermoneutral environments.</p><p>The high HU values observed are related to the age of the birds. Eggs from young hens usually have higher HU values than eggs from older hens, regardless of diet. The HU values of the eggs analyzed in this experiment are in the range of</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of turmeric levels (0; 0.1%; 0.2% and 0.3%) and vitamin E (0; 50 and 100 IU/kg) on the quality of eggs from 20-week-old white layers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin E (IU/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >specific gravity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >yolk color</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yolk (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Albumen (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >shell (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Haugh unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >yolk index</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.95B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43B</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.75B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43B</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.20A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >turmeric (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.095</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vit E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >turmeric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vit E x turmeric</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by different letters in the column differ from each other by the Tukey test (P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Deployment of the interaction between vitamin E and turmeric powder for the yolk color variable of egg from white commercial layers at 20 weeks of age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >yolk color turmeric (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin E (IU/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.94B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07B</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.26AB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.18B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00B</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.53Aab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.65Aa</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Upper case letters in the column and lower case letters in the row differ from each other by Tukey’s test (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>90, independent of the diets used, indicating excellent quality.</p><p>There was no isolated effect of turmeric powder, disagreeing with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref11">11</xref>] , who obtained positive effects of turmeric supplementation observed in laying hens, which presented higher egg production, higher shell weight, higher percentage of yolk, higher fertility and hatchability, when compared with the control.</p><p>There was significant interaction for yolk color (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The inclusion of turmeric was more efficient as a gem dye when it was included in the diet 100 (IU/kg) of vitamin E.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref1">1</xref>] observed a greater presence of white color in the egg yolks when they replaced 50% of the corn from the layer diet by sorghum and used 2% of dry turmeric rhizome. Also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92999-ref14">14</xref>] concluded that dry turmeric rhizome was not a good pigment for quail egg yolk staining.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The addition of vitamin E alone worsens feed intake, egg weight and feed conversion of layers. Added turmeric to 100 IU vitamin E helps improve egg mass indices, Haugh unit and yolk index and intensify yolk staining.</p><p>Although studies have shown beneficial effects of turmeric/curcumin, the results obtained with the use of turmeric in laying diets were not promising. It is possible that the low bioavailability of curcumin as well as the low concentrations of turmeric rhizome used in this study may have limited the scope of the results. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate higher concentrations of turmeric in the diet, as well as to improve the bioavailability of the plant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Lagan&#225;, C., Saldanha, E.S.P.B., Sartori, J.R., Gonzales, E., Luciano, R.L., Zanatta, G. and Fascina, V.B. (2019) Turmeric and Vitamin E on the Performance and Quality of Eggs from White Layers. Agricultural Sciences, 10, 720-726. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2019.106056</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.92999-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laganá, C., Pizzolante, C.C., Saldanha, E. and Moraes, J.E. (2011) Turmeric Root and Annato Seed in Second-Cycle Layer Diets: Performance and Egg Quality. Brazilian Poultry Science, 13, 171-176.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-635x2011000300002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rostagno, H.S., Albino, L.F.T., Donzele, J.L., Gomes, P.C., Oliveira, R.F., Lopes, D. C. and Euclides, R.F. (2011) Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composi&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o de alimentos e exigências nutricionais de aves e suínos. 3a Edition, UFV, Vi&amp;#231;osa, MG.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982007001000027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS Institute (2002) SAS Start User’s Guide, Version 9. SAS Intitute Inc., Cary, NC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malekizadeh, M., Moeini, M.M. and Ghazi, S.H. (2012) The Effects of Different Levels of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc) and Turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn) Rhizomes Powder on Some Blood Metabolites and Production Performance Characteristics of Laying Hens. Journal Agricultural Science Technology, 14, 127-134.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/jmpr11.1316</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, S.S., Kim, J.M., Kim, E.J., Kim, H.S., Kim, B. and Kang, C.W. (2012) Effects of Dietary Turmeric Powder on Laying Performance and Egg Qualities in Laying Hens. Korean Journal Poultry Science, 39, 27-32.  
https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2012.39.1.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radwan, N.L., Hassan, E.M.Q. and Fayek, H.M. (2008) Effect of Natural Antioxidant on Oxidative Stability of Eggs and Productive and Reproductive Performance of Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 134-150.  
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.134.150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bollengier-Lee, S., Williams, P.E. and Whitehead, C.C. (1999) Optimal Dietary Concentration of Vitamin E for Alleviating the Effect of Heat Stress on Egg Production in Laying Hens. British Poultry Science, 40, 102-107.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669987917</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahin, K., Sahin, N. and Onderci, M. (2002a) Vitamin E Supplementation Can Alleviate Negative Effects of Heat Stress on Egg Production, Egg Quality, and Digestibility of Nutrients and Egg Yolk Mineral Concentrations of Japanese Quails. Research in Veterinary Science, 72, 307-312.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-5288(02)00126-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahin, K., Kucuk, O., Sahin, N. and Mustafa, S. (2002b) Effects of Vitamin C and E on Lipid Peroxidation Status, Serum Hormone, Metabolite, and Mineral Concentrations of Japanese Quails Reared under Heat Stress (34&amp;#176;C). Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 72, 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831.72.2.91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirunda, D., Scheideler, S.E. and McKee, R. (2001) The Efficacy of Vitamin E (DLalpha-Tocopheryl Acetate) Supplementation in Hen Diets to Alleviate Egg Quality Deterioration Associated with Temperature Exposure. Poultry Science, 80, 1378-1383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.9.1378</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radwan, N.L., Hassan, R.A., Qota, E.M. and Fayek, H.M. (2008) Effect of Natural Antioxidant on Oxidative Stability of Eggs and Productive and reproductive Performance of Laying Hens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 134-150.  
https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.134.150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, X., Yang, Z.B., Yang, W.R., Wang, Y., Jiang, S.Z. and Zhang, G.G. (2011) Effects of Ginger Root (Zingiber officinale) on Laying Performance and Antioxidant Status of Laying Hens and on Dietary Oxidation Stability. Poultry Science, 90, 1720-1727. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01280</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raghdad, A. and Al-Jaleel, A. (2012) Use of Turmeric (Curcuma longa) on the Performance and Some Physiological Traits on the Broiler Diets. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 36, 51-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92999-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, W.J., Gouveia, A.B.V.., Souza, F.E., Santos, F.R., Silva, J.M.S. and Minafra, C.S. (2017) Turmeric and Sorghum for Egg-Laying Quails. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 16, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2017.1360160</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>