<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JDM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Diabetes Mellitus</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-5831</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jdm.2019.92006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JDM-92839</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Glycemic Control among Medical Outpatients in Enugu: A Cross Sectional Survey
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Obinna</surname><given-names>Donatus Onodugo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Birinus</surname><given-names>Adikaibe Ezeala-Adikaibe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Obumneme</surname><given-names>Benneth Anyim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pascaline</surname><given-names>Onodugo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ijeoma</surname><given-names>Nnene Anyim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nkeiruka</surname><given-names>Chigekwu Mbadiwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekenechukwu</surname><given-names>Young</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>Abonyi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gideon</surname><given-names>Anigbo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ifeomai</surname><given-names>Ulas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Uzoma</surname><given-names>Chukwunonso Okechukwu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Medicine, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Medicine, Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Pediatrics, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>05</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Diabetes in Nigeria presents a rising public health challenge and many cases are probably undetected. Poor glycemic control is a risk factor to both micro and macro vascular complications of diabetes and a major factor in the burden of the disease world-wide. The aim of the present study was to determine the pattern of glycemic control among adult diabetes patients attending a medical outpatient clinic in Enugu. 
  Methods: Using a semi-structured questionnaire, we conducted a cross sectional descriptive study of patients with diabetes attending the medical out-patient clinic of one of the tertiary Hospitals in Enugu, Nigeria. Good glycemic control was defined as fasting blood glucose of less than 100 mg/dl. Study duration was 6 months. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS software. 
  Results: A total of 119 participants were recruited for the study: 74 (62.2%) females and 45 males (37.8%) with a mean age of 62.2 (11.7) years. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was 138.4 (24.3) mmHg and 81.2 (12.9) mmHg respectively. Eight (6.7%) had a docu-mented history of diabetes-related coma in the past. The mean fasting blood glucose was 127.9 (22.4) mg/dl. Good, fair and poor glycemic control was achieved in 16.8%, 30.3% and 63% (52.9%) respectively. Correlation statistics showed that low level of adherence and abstaining from alcohol/tobacco are correlated with poor glycemic control.
   Conclusion: Majority (52.9%) of patients with diabetes attending a tertiary health center in Enugu, Nigeria has poor glycemic control status. Medication adherence and substance use are correlated with poor control.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Diabetes</kwd><kwd> Glycemic Control</kwd><kwd> Enugu</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Diabetes is a common non-communicable disorder in South East Nigeria with a current prevalence as high as 11% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref1">1</xref>] . Diabetes in the country presents a rising public health challenge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref4">4</xref>] and many cases are probably undetected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref3">3</xref>] . Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for both micro and macro vascular complications of diabetes. It is also a major factor in the burden of the disease and has been documented in several studies from Sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref11">11</xref>] . Poor glycemic control remains a challenge worldwide even in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Good glycemic control has been defined in type 2 diabetes as fasting plasma glucose level of between 80 and 110 mg/dl [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref19">19</xref>] . Poor glycemic control has been related to factors such as modality of treatment, age, gender, access to care, diet, obesity, systolic blood pressure, physical activity and level of knowledge of patients and their care givers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref17">17</xref>] . In many Nigerian communities, there is a high rate of herbal-medication use as well as poor knowledge attitude and practice of diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Documented prevalence of glycemic control varies widely and may reach as high as 79% in some studies depending on methodology used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref25">25</xref>] . In Iran more than 64.4% of the patients have poor overall glycemic control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] . In sub-Saharan Africa including Nigeria this figure has consistently remained high [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref24">24</xref>] . A study from the Niger Delta region of Nigeria reported a rate of 55% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] while others have reported rates ranging from34% - 65.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Although most of these studies used HbA1C in their reports, some also used fasting blood glucose measurements. Fasting blood glucose measurement using glucometers is cheaper and readily available. Furthermore, HbA1c could miss out some patients at high risk for diabetic complications following acute changes in blood glucose levels. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has evaluated glycemic control among people living with diabetes in Enugu south-east Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref11">11</xref>] . The aim of the present study was to determine the pattern of glycemic control among adult diabetic patients attending a medical outpatient clinic in Enugu. Detecting the pattern of glycemic control in a hospital setting will form an important public and patient educational tool aimed at prevention of the complications of diabetes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We conducted a cross sectional descriptive study of patients with diabetes who were attending the medical out-patient clinic of the Enugu State University of Science and Technology Teaching Hospital Enugu, Enugu Nigeria. At the time of the study, the hospital had 350 beds distributed among the various specialties with 50 inpatient beds for adult admissions for medical cases. All consecutive consenting patients with were recruited. Diabetes was considered the primary diagnosis in all cases and any other disease in the patients as a comorbidity. Patients with acute febrile illness, diabetic ulcers, first hospital visit for diabetes or taking steroid were excluded. Patients with symptoms suggestive of acute complications of diabetes were also excluded.</p><p>Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethics committee of the Enugu State University Teaching Hospital. Ethical conduct was maintained during data collection and throughout the research process. Informed consent was obtained from each study participant. Study duration was 6 months (June to November 2013).</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>Data was obtained using a semi-structured questionnaire designed by one of the authors (E_ABA) after reviewing similar studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] . The full methodology of the study has been reported elsewhere (see appendix) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref20">20</xref>] . Data on selected sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle behaviors including smoking, drinking and use of herbal/traditional medicine. Past medical history was obtained from the subjects and confirmed from the case notes. All participants were interviewed in the clinic after they had rested in a sitting position for 5 - 10 minutes. Blood pressure was measured thrice by means of mercury sphygmomanometer (Chris Aloy&#174;) according to the guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref26">26</xref>] . Fasting blood glucose was measured using a glucometer (Fine test premium, Infobia Co. Ltd., Dongan-gu, South Korea) after overnight fasting. Fasting blood glucose was obtained once during recruitment in all the patients.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Definition of Terms</title><p>Diabetes was defined as documented evidence of previous diabetes and/or use of hypoglycemic agents in patients’ case notes. Patients attending their first hospital visit for diabetes were excluded. Fasting blood glucose &lt; 110 mg/dl was considered as good control, 110 - 125 mg/dl as fair and FBS ≥ 126 mg/dl as poor control.</p><p>Weight was measured using a bathroom scale in kilograms. Height was measured in centimeters with the patient standing erect on a flat surface. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (Kg) divided by squared height (m<sup>2</sup>).</p><p>A patient was considered to have hypertension if the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥90 mmHg and/or recorded use of anti-hypertensive drugs. Recent tobacco and alcohol use were defined as use of tobacco in any form and consumption of alcohol within the last 4 weeks. Occupation was defined as the primary job which takes at least 50% of the working hours in a week. Other medical co-morbidities were defined using standard criteria or past medical history diagnosed by a qualified personnel (doctors). Level of education was the individual’s highest educational (formal) attainment.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Instruments</title><p>The Morinsky-Green Medication adherence scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref27">27</xref>] was used to estimate medication adherence. Answers consistent with adherence were scored as 0 and answers consistent with non-adherence were scored as 1. For the purpose of the index study the scores are tallied and graded into high adherence (0 - 2), medium adherence (3 - 5) and low adherence (6 - 8).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Methods</title><p>For database management and statistical analyses, SPSS version23 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA) was used. Data were presented in tables. For continuous variables, mean values and standard deviation were calculated. Rates were expressed as percentages. Categorical values were compared using the Chi Square test. Mean values were compared using the independent t-test. In all, p value of &lt;0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Conclusions were drawn at 95% confidence interval.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title>Characteristics of the Participants<p>A total of 119 cases of diabetes who have attended the clinic at least more than once were recruited for the study. They were made of 74 (62.2%) females and 45 males (37.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The mean age (sd) of the patients was 62.2 (11.7) years with a range of 36 to 89 years. The age distribution is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Males were older than females by 10 years (P &lt; 0.01). Although females were shorter (P &lt; 0.01), they had a higher mean BMI (P &lt; 0.01). Patients came equally from both urban and rural areas. The level of education, occupation and other characteristics of the population are also shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was similar in bother sexes. Medical history showed that most had hypertension 101 (84.9%) and chronic headache 52 (43.7%). Eight (6.7%) had a documented history of diabetes-related coma in the past. Of all comorbidities only Parkinson disease was commoner in males (P = 0.03). Seventeen (14.3%) patients were current tobacco users, 90 (75.6%) used herbal or alternative medicine in one form or the other in the past and 33 (27.7%) used alcohol. Medication adherence measured by the Morinsky-Green Medication adherence scale is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Adherence was similar in males and females (P = 0.6).</p><p>The mean fasting blood glucose is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and the distribution in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Good blood glucose control (&lt;110 mg/dl) was only achieved in 16.8% while another 30.3% had a fair control and 63 (52.9%) achieved poor glycemic control. The distribution of glycemic control was not statistically significant in any of the categories considered (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Correlation statistics using Spearman Rho statistic showed that low level of adherence and abstaining from alcohol/tobacco correlated with poor glycemic control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Patients’ characteristics and other variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Females</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Males</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 (62.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (37.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age, years mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.4 &#177; 11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.2 &#177; 10.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.2 (11.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Height, cm mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.1 &#177; 6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.3 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.7 (7.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight, kg mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.4 &#177; 15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.9 &#177; 11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.4 (13.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Body mass index, kg/m<sup>2</sup> mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6 &#177; 5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1 &#177; 3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.6 (5.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of residence n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (74.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (68.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86 (72.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (31.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (25.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (27.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of education n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (37.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 (42.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (20.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (56.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (29.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (46.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (15.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (54.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (30.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Office workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (29.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (11.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (22.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Business</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (26.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (9.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (19.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (15.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (6.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (12.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artisans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (18.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (7.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (14.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (2.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (10.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peripheral hemodynamics, mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Systolic pressure, mm Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.3 &#177; 25.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.6 &#177; 23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.4 (24.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diastolic pressure, mm Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.6 &#177; 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.5 &#177; 14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.2 (12.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Measurements on blood, mean &#177; sd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose, mg/dl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128 &#177; 22.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.7 &#177; 22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.9 (22.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical history n, (%) Hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (83.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (86.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (84.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chronic headache</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (43.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (44.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (43.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arthritis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (58.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (55.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 (57.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stroke</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (10.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (10.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parkinson’s disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (4.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (15.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (7.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart failure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (11.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (9.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (24.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (12.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (16.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Past History of Diabetic Coma n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (5.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (8.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (6.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lifestyle n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Current use of tobacco, n (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (6.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (26.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Used herbal medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 (77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (73.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 (75.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Use of alcohol,</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (28.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (27.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morinsky Adherence Score n, (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High (0 - 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (62.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (64.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 (63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium (3 - 5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (28.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (31.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (29.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low (6 - 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (9.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (7.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>P-values are for the sex differences.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Level of glycemic control among the participants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Level of control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fair</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (16.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (30.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63 (52.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (22.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (30.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (38.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (13.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (33.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (61.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5 - 24.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (19.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (61.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 - 29.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (26.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (18.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (43.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (37.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age Group (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (12.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (39.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (48.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (24.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (29.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (46.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (26.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (25.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Place of residence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urban</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (36)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (24.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (15.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (60.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (23.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (7.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (69.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (12.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (47.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Working</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (12.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (34.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (52.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (16.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (58.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retired</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (25.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (22.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (51.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Comorbidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None-one</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (17.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (17.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (65.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Two-Three</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (17.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (49.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Four-five</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (13.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (46.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Correlates of good/fair glycemic control in the patients</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R (P-value)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.05 (0.58)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender (male 1, female 0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.01 (0.95)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Body Mass Index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.04 (0.67)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupational status (1 working, 0 not working)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.00 (0.97)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of education (1 primary, 2 secondary, 3 tertiary)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12 (0.18)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residence (1 urban, 0 rural)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 (0.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of adherence (1 high, 2 moderate, 3 low)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Substance use* (2, both, 1 either, 0 none)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.19 (0.04)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Presence of comorbidities (1 yes, 0 no)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06 (0.49)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of coma (1 yes, 0 no)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 (0.58)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Use of alcohol and/or tobacco.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The findings of this study reveal an overall poor glycemic control among medical out-patients in one of the major hospitals in Enugu metropolis. A total of 63 (52.9%) had poor control. Glycemic control was similar in males and females, in all age groups and all categories studied. It was slightly better among rural dwellers. Only the poor medication adherence and non-substance use correlated with poor control.</p><p>Individuals with FBG greater than 125 mg/dl are at greater risk of developing chronic complications of diabetes and other cardiovascular complications like strokes and myocardial infarction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref19">19</xref>] . Therefore, poor glycemic control status in diabetic patients should be considered a target for public health authorities as well as health educationists.</p><p>The rate of poor glycemic control in the index study is within the range reported in Nigeria and the sub-continent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref25">25</xref>] . Unlike in most of these studies, we used fasting blood glucose as an indicator of control instead of HbA1C. Although fasting blood glucose offers only a narrow window into the overall blood glucose level of the patient, it is often the most available method of checking glycemic control in our setting and often more likely to be available at home, health centers and most private hospitals. It therefore forms the basis for day to day management of patients and adjustment of medications.</p><p>Females and younger patients had non-statistical higher rates of poor control. This is similar to previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref29">29</xref>] . The reasons for relationship between age, gender and glycemic control may be multifaceted. Better glycemic control has been associated with the duration of diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref17">17</xref>] and by implication older individuals. Other factors such as multiple comorbidities in older individual, use of multiple medications and hence increased pill burden, dependency and poverty may all be contributory. The high proportion of females reported in this study may be attributed to fact that females were also younger who are known to be less adherent and have poor health seeking behaviour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref31">31</xref>] . The index report is similar to a previous study from Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Rural dwellers also had a non-significant higher rate good glycemic control when compared to urban dwellers. Reasons for this may be attitudinal which may be linked to pressure from family members and relatives to try one cure after the other as well as prevalent poor knowledge and practice of diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] . The non-significant finding between urban and rural dwellers is similar to was reported from other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>There was no significant difference between patients who were employed and those who were not at the time of the study. The relationship between employment status and affordability of health care may not always be straightforward. It is important to remember that most patients in the African context have very high rates of social support and may not be fully responsible for their medical bills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref32">32</xref>] . Furthermore, being actively engaged during working hours may interfere with taking medications especially insulin.</p><p>Similar to other studies BMI did not correlate with glycemic control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] . One suggested reason for the lack of correlation between BMI and glycemic control was the fact that patients with diabetes gain weight with age irrespective of glucose control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Glycemic control also did not differ significantly between patients with different levels of education. Several studies have reported that formal education significantly improves adherence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref34">34</xref>] which may contribute to glycemic control. However, higher level of education does not necessarily enhance the understanding of the disease and its complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>An interesting finding is the negative correlation of substance use (alcohol and tobacco) with poor glycemic control. It is interesting to note that neither of these substances correlated with glycemic control alone but did so when combined. Reasons for this are not clear because of the limitations of the index study. It is an established fact that both tobacco and alcohol may worsen the cardiovascular complications of diabetes just as poor glycemic control. Hence one may be inclined to suggest that those who had poor control and/or who presented with complications were more likely to abstain. In Saudi Arabia, researchers also did not find any correlation between smoking and glycemic control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref16">16</xref>] . The history of previous diabetic coma was recorded in few cases and did not correlate with the level of glycemic control. Diabetic Keto-acidosis has been reported to predict poor long term glycemic control in children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref37">37</xref>] . Previous history of coma in the index study may not only reflect poor control but also severity at diagnosis due to high level of unawareness. Medical comorbidities were common among our patients because of their age distribution. Comorbidities increase pill load leading to drug fatigue and hence non-adherence to medications including anti diabetic drugs. However, there was no correlation between the number of associated comorbidities and level of control which is similar to some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92839-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>Improving glycemic control remains a key factor in the management of diabetes and prevention of complications. In a region with high levels of infectious diseases and growing burden of metabolic disorders the measures towards improving glycemic control cannot be overemphasized. The apparent lack of significant correlates in this study suggests that the answer to this problem may lie elsewhere—patients education and lifestyle changes that are associated with it.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations</title><p>This study has some limitations. First, the time between the previous estimation of FPG and the current FPG was not the same for all patients. Secondly, as previously stated HbA1c is more useful in estimating long term control. Thirdly, our study did not include data on diet and lifestyle changes required in the management of such patients. Furthermore, we recruited patients from a teaching hospital set-up which may include many cases of difficult-to-manage cases as well as complicated cases of diabetes which in turn may limit the generalization of our findings.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>The majority of the patients in the current study had poor glycemic control status. The level of medication adherence and substance use are correlated with poor control. The index study suggests that many factors may be related to glycemic control which may include patients’ education and drug selection. Further research should be conducted to evaluate patient and physician centered factors in glycemic control.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Onodugo, O.D., Ezeala-Adikaibe, B.A., Anyim, O.B., Onodugo, P., Anyim, I.N., Mbadiwe, N.C., Young, E., Abonyi, M., Anigbo, G., Ulasi, I. and Okechukwu, U.C. (2019) Glycemic Control among Medical Outpatients in Enugu: A Cross Sectional Survey. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 9, 50-61. https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2019.92006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.92839-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezeala-Adikaibe, B.A., Mbadiwe, N., Okwara, C., Onodugo, O., Onyekonwu, C., Ijoma, U., Ekenze, O.S., Orjioke, C., Chime, P., Aneke, E., Nwatu, C.B., Young, E. and Anyim, O. (2018) Diabetes and Pre-Diabetes among Adults in an Urban Slum in South East Nigeria. Journal of Diabetes Mellitus, 8, 131-144.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/jdm.2018.84013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ejike, C.E.C.C., Uka, N.K. and Nwachukwu, S.O. (2015) Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adult Nigerians: Prevalence, and Correlations of Blood Glucose Concentrations with Measures of Obesity. African Journal of Biochemistry Research, 9, 55-60.  
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBR2015.0817</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chinenye, S. and Young, E. (2011) State of Diabetes Care in Nigeria: A Review. Nigeria Health Journal, 11, 101-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinjinmi, A.A., Adeyooye, O.A., Akingbade, O.A. and Okerentugba, P.O. (2014) Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Researcher, 6, 73-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ufuoma, C., Godwin, Y.D., Kester, A.D. and Ngozi, J.C. (2016) Determinants of Control among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Niger Delta. Sahel Medical Journal, 19, 190-195. https://doi.org/10.4103/1118-8561.196361</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odili, V.U., Isiboge, P.D and Eregie, A. (2011). Patients’ Knowledge of Diabetes Mellitus in a Nigerian City. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10, 637-642.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v10i5.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Frier, B.M. and Fisher, M. (2010) Diabetes Mellitus. In: Colledge, N.R., Walker, B.R. and Ralston, S.H., Eds., Davidson’s Principles and Practice of Medicine, 21st Edition, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Edin-burgh, 795-833.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-3085-7.00021-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musenge, E.M., Manankov, A., Mudenda, B. and Michelo, C. (2014) Glycaemic Control in Diabetic Patients in Zambia. Pan African Medical Journal, 9, 354.  
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.19.354.5264</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phiri, M.P., Chimwemwe, M.J. and Damson, K. (2014) Prevalence and Correlates of Diabetes Mellitus in Malawi: Population-Based National NCD STEPS Survey. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 14, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-14-41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adebisi</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Glycated Haemoglobin and Glycaemic Control of Diabetics in Ilorin</article-title><source> Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice</source><volume> 12</volume>,<fpage> 87</fpage>-<lpage>91</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otieno, C.F., Kariuki, M. and Nganga, L. (2003) Quality of Glycaemic Control in Ambulatory Diabetics at the Out-Patient Clinic of Kenyatta National Hospital. East African Medical Journal, 80, 406-410. https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v80i8.8731</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okafor, C.I. and Ofoegbu, E.N. (2012) Control to Goal of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors among Nigerians Living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 15, 15-18. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.94089</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntui, I., Udoh, A.E., Esiere, K.-U.S., Essien, O. and Egbe, E.R. (2006) The Pattern of Dietary Habits and Control of Diabetics in Eastern Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 5, 43-45. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2006.43.45</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bi, Y., Zhu, D., Cheng, J., Zhu, Y., Xu, N., Cui, S., Li, W., Cheng, X., Wang, F., Hu, Y., Shen, S. and Weng, J. (2010) The Status of Control: A Cross-Sectional Study of Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus across Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Hospitals in the Jiangsu Province of China. Clinical Therapy, 32, 973-983.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mendes, B.V.A., Fittipaldi, A.S.J., Neves, C.S.R., Celestino, S.R., Chacra, R.A. and Moreira Jr., D.E. (2010) Prevalence and Correlates of Inadequate Glycaemic Control: Results from a Nationwide Survey in 6,671 Adults with Diabetes in Brazil. Acta Diabetologica, 47, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0138-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janghorbani, M. and Amini, M. (2012) Patterns and Predictors of Long-Term Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. International Scholarly Research Network Endocrinology, 2012, Article ID: 526824. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/526824</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Nuaim, A.R., Mirdad, S., Al-Rubeaan, K., Al-Mazrou, Y., Al-Attas, O. and Al-Daghari, N. (1998) Pattern and Factors Associated with Control of Saudi Diabetic Patients. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 18, 109-112.  
https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.1998.109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reisig, V., Reitmeir, P., D&amp;ouml;ring, A., Rathmann, W. and Mielck, A. (2007) Social Inequalities and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes in the German Region of Augsburg: A Cross-Sectional Survey. International Journal of Public Health, 52, 158-165.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-007-5077-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arai, K., Hirao, K., Matsuba, I., Takai, M., Matoba, K., Takeda, H., Kanamori, A., Yamauchi, M., Mori, H. and Terauchi, Y. (2009) The Status of Control by General Practitioners and Specialists for Diabetes in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 15,652 Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 83, 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2008.11.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezeala-Adikaibe, B.A., Mbadiwe, N., Okudo, G., Nwosu, N. and Nwobodo, N. (2017) Factors Associated with Medication Adherence among Hypertensive Patients in a Tertiary Health Center: A Cross-Sectional Study. Achieves of Community Medicine and Public Health, 3, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5479.000021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gudina, E.K., Amade, S.T., Tesfamichael, F.A. and Ram, R. (2011) Assessment of Quality of Care Given to Diabetic Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital Diabetes Follow-Up Clinic, Jimma, Ethiopia. BMC Endocrine Disorders, 11, 19.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-11-19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fox, K.M., Gerber Pharmd, R.A., Bolinder, B., Chen, J. and Kumar, S. (2006) Prevalence of Inadequate Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database: A Series of Retrospective Analyses of Data from 1998 through 2002. Clinical Therapy, 28, 388-395.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yusuff, K.B., Obe, O. and Joseph, B.Y. (2008) Adherence to An-ti-Diabetic Drug Therapy and Self-Management Practices among Type-2 Diabetics in Nigeria. Pharmacy World and Science, 30, 876-883.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-008-9243-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adisa, R., Fakeye, T.O. and Fasanmade, A. (2011) Medication Adherence among Ambulatory Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in a Tertiary Healthcare Setting in Southwestern Nigeria. Pharmacy Practice (Granada), 9, 72-81.  
https://doi.org/10.4321/S1886-36552011000200003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khattab, M., Khader, Y.S., Al-Khawaldeh, A. and Ajlouni, K. (2010) Factors Associated with Poor Control among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Complications, 24, 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Brien, E., Asmar, R., Beilin, L., Imai, Y., Mancia, G., Mengden, T., Meyers, M., Palatini, P., Parati, G., Pickering, T., Redon, J., Staessen, J., Stergiou, G. and Verdecchia, P. (2005) Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for Clinic, Ambulatory and Self Blood Pressure Measurement. Journal of Hypertension, 23, 697-701. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000163132.84890.c4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morisky, D.E., Green, L.W. and Levine, D.M. (1986) Concurrent and Predictive Validity of a Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence. Medical Care, 24, 67-74.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198601000-00007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shani, M., Taylor, T.R., Vinker, S., Lustman, A., Erez, R., Elhayany, A. and Lahad, A. (2008) Characteristics of Diabetics with Poor Control Who Achieve Good Control. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 21, 490-496.  
https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.06.070267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreira Jr., E.D., Neves, R.C., Nunes, Z.O., de Almeida, M.C., Mendes, A.B., Fittipaldi, J.A. and Abian, F.(2010) Control and Its Correlates in Patients with Diabetes in Venezuela: Results from a Nationwide Survey. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87, 407-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2009.12.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boima, V., Ademola, A.D., Odusola, A.O., Agyekum, F., Nwafor, C.E., Cole, H., Salako, B.B., Ogedegbe, G. and Tayo, B.O. (2015) Factors Associated with Medication Nonadherence among Hypertensives in Ghana and Nigeria. International Journal of Hypertension, 2015, Article ID: 205716. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/205716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osamor, P.E. and Owumi, B.E. (2011) Factors Associated with Treatment Compliance in Hypertension in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 29, 619-628. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v29i6.9899</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ekeopara</surname><given-names> C.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>The Impact of the Extended Family System on So-cio-Ethical Order in Igboland</article-title><source> American Journal of Social Issues and Humanities</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 262</fpage>-<lpage>267</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghods, A.J. and Nasrollahzadeh, D. (2003) Noncompliance with Immunosuppressive Medications after Renal Transplantation. Tissue Antigens, 60, 553-553.  
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.00010.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DiMatteo, M.R. (2004) Social Support and Patient Adherence to Medical Treatment: A Meta-Analysis. Health Psychology, 23, 207-218.  
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duca, L.M., Wang, B. and Rewers, A. (2017) Diabetic Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Predicts Poor Long-Term Control. Diabetes Care, 40, 1249-1255.  
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-0558</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khanolkar, A.R., Amin, R., Taylor-Robinson, D., Viner, R.M., Warner, J., Gevers, E.F. and Stephenson, T. (2017) Diabetic Ketoacidosis Severity at Diagnosis and Glycaemic Control in the First Year of Childhood Onset Type 1 Diabetes—A Longitudinal Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, pii: E26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Kebbi, I.M., Ziemer, D.C., Cook, C.B., Miller, C.D., Gallina, D.L. and Philips, L.S. (2001) Comorbidity and Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Achieves of Internal Medicine, 161, 1295-1300. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.161.10.1295</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92839-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greenfield, S., Billimek, J., Pellegrini, F., Franciosi, M., DeBerardis, G., Nicolucci, A., Sherrie, H. and Kaplan, S.H. (2009) Comorbidity Affects the Relationship between Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Diabetes: A Cohort Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 854-860.  
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00005</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>