<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2150-4091</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ns.2019.115014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NS-92314</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Simulation Analysis of Surface Roughness for Milling Process
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jixuan</surname><given-names>Yuan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhenjiu</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Shenzhen Institute of Information Technology, Shenzhen, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>05</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Surface roughness is one of the most important evaluation indexes in machine cutting. In order to analyze how the tool path affects the roughness of the surface after milling, series of simulations are implemented in MasterCAM. We set up the same processing conditions with same parameters such as speed, material and feed rate etc. in these simulations, but different processing paths are used. We choose three paths: the parallel milling along the X-Y axis direction, the parallel milling along the Z-X or Z-Y axis direction and the streamline processing in the simulations. At the same time, end miller, arc miller and ball miller are respectively selected in the software. So there are totally 9 simulations of the milling process
   that
   are performed. Then the experimental cutting processes are performed correspondingly and the surface roughness and the accuracy are measured. The results show that the milling effect of the arc is better and the waste is minimal in the parallel milling along the Z-X or Z-Y axis direction with the end mills.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Surface Roughness</kwd><kwd> Tool Path</kwd><kwd> Machining Accuracy</kwd><kwd> Milling</kwd><kwd> Simulation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The processing of the injection mold needs milling, grinding, EDM, and light etching process, etc., but the CNC milling process is still the fastest and the most economical way of achieving the main structure and shape of the molds. Lots of papers are focusing on the milling processing of the injection mold, for example, many researches are devoted to studying the relations between the processing quality and the machining speed and feed rate [1-3], and also many studies are devoted to analyzing the difference of the dry milling and wet milling, which can markedly affect the processing quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92314-ref4">4</xref>], and many researches are focusing on studying that the different processing path can shorten the processing time and markedly increase the processing efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92314-ref5">5</xref>]. MasterCAM is an widely used CAD/CAM software which can benefit the design and process the mould and die [6-10], but many studies are always focusing on using the MasterCAM to realize the automatic programming [6,7]. Also, the technological parameters are studied for finding the most reasonable process parameter setting, so that the processing speed of the part can be improved markedly [8,9], and one aspect of the process setting is the tool path [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92314-ref10">10</xref>]. But these studies have not performed more comprehensive analysis about the tool path’s effect on the mold processing.</p><p>This paper focuses on the finish milling of the mold surfaces, the comprehensive analysis and comparison of the surface milling by using different processing paths that are performed to achieve the high precision and the machining quality. Research achievements will be used in the milling of the inner fillet of master mold or the outer arc of the mold heart. The analysis and comparison realized by experimental machining and measurement can prove that the high precision and quality can be obtained in the injection mold milling.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Arc contour machining simulation</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Simulation of the Basic Parameter Settings</title><p>In the computer-aided manufacturing software such as Master CAM, the effects of the different processing paths are compared in the same speed, tools, materials and other conditions.</p><p>1) Setting the basic operating parameters</p><p>The size of workpiece and the coordinate frame are set already which can determine the moving scope of the physical tool; correspondingly, the boundary, NC machining scope and the working scope can be determined by the setting of the original point and corner. The work setting dialog box in Master CAM is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Concretely, the size of workpiece is 10 mm, 10 mm and 20 mm respectively in the direction of X, Y and Z; the origin of the workpiece is (0, 0, 0); the option of the tool path planning includes “output the operation comments to NCI”, “generate tool paths immediately”, “save the tool paths into MC9” and “assign the tool number in sequence”; in the setting of cutter compensation number, the “increase” is chosen and both of the length and radius of cutter are set as 0; in the computation of feed rate, the option “according to the cutter” is chosen, and the maximum speed is 5000 RMP; the material of workpiece is ALUMINUM mm-2024; the post-processors is MPFAN.</p><p>2) Parameters setting of surface finish</p><p>Surface finish is the final cutting process which can definitively determine the quality. The most important cutting parameters are the tool form, the feed rate, the tool lifting speed, the tool down speed and the spindle speed, etc. In addition, the setting of the finishing parameters consists of the maximum cutting distance and the overall cutting error settings. The tool parameter settings of the surface finishing are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, and the processing parameter table of this test is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Processing parameters table</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tool size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Φ 8 mm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feed rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 mm /min</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Down speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 mm /min</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lifting speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600 mm /min</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spindle speed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500 rpm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum cutting distance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 mm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Test of Machining Ways</title><p>Using the different tools, the simulations are carried out according to various processing paths in Master CAM, such as the parallel milling along the X-Y axis, the parallel milling along the Z-X or Z-Y axis to the milling and the streamline processing. After the processing surfaces and the processing parameters are set, the tool paths are automatically calculated by MasterCAM. The path planning graph is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The administrator device can be used to set the plane and the parameters, and finally the solid cutting simulation is carried out to verify the setting.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Simulation Results</title><p>According to the simulation results, the best three methods, the parallel milling along the X-Y axis, the parallel milling along the Z-X or Z-Y axis and the streamline processing are chosen as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The simulation results are shown in Figures 5-10. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> is the result for the parallel milling of the end mill along the Z-X axis and the Z-Y axis, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> is the result for the streamline processing of the end mill, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> is the result for the parallel milling of the ball mill along the Z-X axis and the Z-Y axis direction, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> is the result for the streamline processing of the ball mill, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> is the result for the parallel milling of the arc mill along the Z-X axis and the Z-Y axis, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 is the result for the streamline processing of the arc mill.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Machining experiments of arc contouring</title><p>All the cutting processes are simulated successfully, so the NC programs can be obtained by using the MasterCAM according to the corresponding parameters set in the simulations. The code generated by MasterCAM is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. After the file conversion has finished, the practical cutting processes are performed by using a CNC milling machine, and totally 9 samples (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) are processed in accordance with the processing conditions in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Roughness measurement of milling surface</title><p>By use of a surface profiler, the roughness of the samples obtained from the practical cutting processes is measured. The measurement results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Obviously, sample 4, sample 3 and sample 7 have better surface roughness than others, and the sample 1 has the worst surface roughness.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions and discussion</title><p>According to the measurement results of the surface profiler machined by using the program generated by Master CAM, the path of parallel milling along Z-X axis can obtain the best surface roughness. But</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sample processing conditions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Processing conditions</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of end mill along Z-X axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of end mill along Z-Y axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Streamline processing of end mill</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of ball mill along Z-X axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of the ball mill along Z-Y axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Streamline processing of ball mill</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of arc mill along Z-X axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parallel milling of arc mill along Z-Y axis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Streamline processing of arc mill</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Value of surface roughness measurement (unit: μm)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >First measured value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Second measured value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Third measured value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >average value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.577</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.212</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.716</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.801</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.575</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.648</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.587</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.522</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.529</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.798</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.904</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.209</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.326</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.642</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.881</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.672</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.732</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the simulation results show that the machining process will result in over-cutting if the processing condition in Case 4 is selected. Because the Master CAM calculates the processing path without the consideration of the cutter radius of the ball mill, this processing condition is not preferred. Therefore, by use of the parallel milling of the end mill along the Z-X or Z-Y axis, the arc quality is better than others, and the waste is minimal. These research results can guide the practices in milling of the inner fillet of the master mold, the outer arc of the mold heart and the injection mold, which can greatly benefit the precision and quality.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The financial support of the project by Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan (No. JCYJ20170817112916883; JCYJ20160307101647019) and Shenzhen Institute of Information and Technology Project (No. ZY201708) is acknowledged.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.92314-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, Q.F. and Wang, X.J. (2008) High-Speed Tool Steel Hardened Stainless Steel Milling Process. Machinery Design &amp; Manufacture, 2008, 108-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y.Y., Zhao, P., Wang, Z. and Liu, K.C. (2008) Application of High-Speed Milling Technology in Die &amp; Mold Manufacture. Die &amp;Mould Manufacture, 2008, 71-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Z.P. and Zhang, Z.G. (2006) High-Speed Milling Process and Applied Instances for Die &amp; Mold. Die &amp; Mould Manufacture, 2006, 75-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, L. and Lian, L.C. (2008) Application and Key Technologies of Die &amp; Mould High Speed Milling. Development &amp; Innovation of Machinery &amp; Electrical Products, 21, 170, 177-178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, Z.G. and He, Q.G. (2007) The Process of Using HSM in Plastic Bottle Manufacturing. Mechanical Engineer, 2007, 115-116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names> X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Four-Axle Linkage NC Machining of Lamina Part Based on MasterCAM</article-title><source> Die and Mould Technology</source><volume> 2015</volume>,<fpage> 54</fpage>-<lpage>57</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lu</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>NC Machining of Complex Die-Casting Die Based on MasterCAM</article-title><source> Die &amp; Mould Manufacture</source><volume> 2015</volume>,<fpage> 62</fpage>-<lpage>65</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.P. and Ma, C.L. (2015) CNC Machining of Phone Convex Model Based on MasterCAM. Machine Building &amp; Automation, 2015, 52-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qian, C.H. and Qian, Y.L. (2010) NC Machining Technology of Flow Injection Mold Based on MasterCAM and UG. Mechanical Engineer, 2010, 94-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92314-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, Z.B. and Qin, Y.F. (2011) Research on Integrated Technique of Digital Design and Machining Simulation for Plastics Injection Mould. Machine Tool &amp; Hydraulics, 39, 121-124.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>