<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ABB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8456</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abb.2019.104007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ABB-92040</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Continuous Fermentation of a Prodigiosin-Producing &lt;i&gt;Serratia marcescens &lt;/i&gt;Strain Isolated from Soil
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Fu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yujuan</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xuehui</surname><given-names>Duan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Huabin</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhixia</surname><given-names>Zhuang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jinhai</surname><given-names>Shen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yangyue</surname><given-names>Pei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Haojia</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meiyu</surname><given-names>Gan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Science and Technology for Inspection, Xiamen Huaxia University, Xiamen, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>108</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A red-pigmented bacterial strain NS-17 was isolated from soil, and physiological and biochemical characteristics and 16S rDNA analysis established this organism as a strain of 
  Serratia marcescens. The red pigment isolated from cells of NS-17 was identified as prodigiosin. By analyzing factors affecting the production of prodigiosin, modified medium and culture conditions were set up, and a continuous fermentation method was carried out to take advantage of the mass production of foam during fermentation. Continuous fermentation was achieved in the following conditions: 32℃, 1:1 ventilation ratio, and medium with a nutrient concentration 5-fold higher than that of the fermentation medium (with half the inorganic salt concentration) supplied as a feed medium at a flow rate of 8 mL/min. For the first time of continuous fermentation of 
  Serratia marcescens coupling with foam flotation, a high yield of prodigiosin was obtained. After 56 h of culturing, the total harvest of cells was enhanced 2.33-fold compared to that of batch fermentation, the total amount of prodigiosin was enhanced 2.70-fold compared to that of batch fermentation, and cells and prodigiosin were concentrated in the efflux broth automatically.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Serratia marcescens&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Prodigiosin</kwd><kwd> Foam</kwd><kwd> Continuous Fermentation</kwd><kwd> Automatic Concentration</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Metabolites of microorganisms represent one of the most important sources of medicines, especially important for the discovery and development of novel pharmaceuticals. Prodigiosin (PG) is a family of natural red pigments extracted from some species of Streptomyces, Serratia, Pseudomonas and other genera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref2">2</xref>] ; these pigments are a kind of typical alkaloid compound produced as a secondary metabolite. Some members of this pigment family have shown a variety of drug activities, such as antibacterial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref3">3</xref>] , antifungal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref4">4</xref>] , antimalarial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref6">6</xref>] , antialgal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref8">8</xref>] , immunomodulating [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref10">10</xref>] and antitumor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref12">12</xref>] activities, displaying important medicinal properties.</p><p>Serratia marcescens is the most widely used PG-producing bacterium due to its high production of both biomass and prodigiosin. The traditional production of PG was by batch fermentation, but the yield was not sufficiently high, and because the fermentation process produces considerable foam, operators must add a large amount of defoamer, which is not conducive to downstream extraction and purification. In this study, a red-pigmented bacterium strain NS-17 isolated from soil was identified as S. marcescens according to its physiological and biochemical characteristics and 16S rDNA sequence, and the red pigment, PG, was characterized by LC/MS, FT-IR and NMR. Willenbacher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref13">13</xref>] and Cui [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref14">14</xref>] got high yield of product by coupling the fermentation process and foam flotation. To improve the yield of PG and to avoid requiring defoamer, the S. marcescens cells were continuously separated from the broth by the foam produced during fermentation, and the efflux broth was collected.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Bacterial Strain and Media</title><p>A red-pigmented bacterium NS-17 was isolated from the soil of the Nanchang area with a nutrient agar plate. NS-17 was incubated in liquid medium containing 4 g of glycerol, 16 g of peptone, 4 g of NaCl and 7 g of KCl at 28˚C and shaken at 160 rpm for 24 h in a shaking incubator.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Identification of NS-17</title><p>Morphological and biochemical tests were done using standard procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref15">15</xref>] . Ultrastructural studies were performed by scanning electron microscopy.</p><p>The 16S rDNA of NS-17 was isolated and sequenced. The sequence was compared with available 16S sequences in GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). A phylogenetic tree was constructed with the Mega program, and 1000 bootstrap resampling was applied to evaluate the robustness of the phylogenetic tree.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Extraction and Isolation of Pigment</title><p>After fermentation, NS-17 cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with distilled water. Acidified ethanol (pH 3.0) was added to the cell mass to extract pigment, and the mixture was centrifuged. The pigment in ethanol was isolated using phase separation with water and chloroform. The chloroform phase containing red pigment was concentrated by rotary evaporation. The red pigment was separated by silica gel column chromatography and eluted with a mixture of hexane: ethyl acetate (2:1, v/v). The concentrated pigment was purified by development in a 1: 8: 1 (v/v) mixture of ligroin: chloroform: methanol using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and then repurified with further TLC (chloroform: acetidin = 2: 1 [v/v]). The isolated pigment was then collected and dissolved in acidified ethanol. The pigments were dried using a vacuum freeze dryer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Characterization of Red Pigments</title><p>The purified pigment was dissolved in ethanol, with pH = 5.0 or 9.0 (adjusted by HCl/NaOH) to analyze the absorption spectra under acidic and basic conditions, and the absorbance at wavelengths 300 - 700 nm of the pigment was scanned under those two pH values.</p><p>The molecular mass of the pigment was determined using an Agilent LC/MS (HPLC: 1200, eluted with a mixture of methanol: 0.1% formic acid [70:30, v/v]; TOFMS: G 6220A , ESI-MS). The <sup>1</sup>H- and <sup>13</sup>C -NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 600 spectrometer (300 MHz), and CDCl<sub>3</sub> was used as the solvent. FT-IR spectra of the pigments were recorded with a Nicolet 5700 FT -IR spectrometer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Optimization of Flask Culture Conditions</title><p>The purified prodigiosin was used to establish a formula between OD<sub>535</sub> and mass concentration.</p><p>The culture broth was mixed with acidic methanol (pH 3.0). The volume of methanol was adjusted according to the OD<sub>535</sub> of the mixture to ensure the optical density was in the range of 0. 2- 1.0.</p><p>Because NS-17 produced minimal pigment in LB broth (the most widely used medium for production of prodigiosin), we tested several media reported for fermentation of prodigiosin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref18">18</xref>] and chose the initial medium as follows: glycerol 4 g/L, peptone 16 g/L, NaCl 3 g/L, and KCl 4 g/L; pH 7.0. The initial culture conditions were as follows: inoculum size: 1.0%, 100 mL of medium in flask (250 mL), culture temperature 28˚C, and rotation speed 160 rpm. The production of prodigiosin was measured after 24 h culture.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Continuous Fermentation</title><p>A 50 L bioreactor was used to perform the continuous fermentation under the optimized conditions of the flask culture with no additional defoamer, and the foam was removed as soon as it reached the top of the bioreactor. A medium with a nutrient concentration 5-fold higher than that of the fermentation medium (with half the inorganic salt concentration) was supplied as a feed medium according to the flow rate of efflux foam. The pH of the broth was automatically adjusted with HCl and NH<sub>4</sub>・OH.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Identification of the Bacterium Strain NS-17</title><p>NS-17 was a gram-negative, subspheroidal or rod-shaped bacterium strain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The colonies of NS-17 on nutrient agar were moist, sticky and spreading, with a metallic luster and irregular margins. The organism could liquefy gelatin and use citrate or acetate as the only carbon source; the phenylalanine deaminase, L-arabinose fermentation, pectate decomposition and H<sub>2</sub>S tests were negative, while the results were positive for DNAase, V. P, lipase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase and aesculin hydrolysis tests. Moreover, NS-17 could use trehalose and D-sorbitol but not malonate or alginate. The physiological and biochemical identification tests suggested bacterium NS-17 to be S. marcescens.</p><p>The 16S rDNA showed the highest similarity to that of S. marcescens and 99% similarity to both S. marcescens L1 (EF 208031) and S. marcescens SA1 (HM 136580). A close evolutionary relationship between NS-17 and some other strains of S. marcescens was revealed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>All the results showed that NS-17 was a member of S. marcescens, and the strain was therefore named S. marcescens NS-17.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Characterization of the Pigment</title><p>Purified Serratia marcescens strain NS-17 was fermented in a shaken flask to produce pigments. After separation with column chromatography and purification by TLC, the red pigment was obtained.</p><p>The UV-Vis spectrum of the pigment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) was similar to the typical spectrum of prodigiosin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref2">2</xref>] . The TOFMS analysis result is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The [M + H] of the pigment was 324.2072, corresponding to C<sub>20</sub>H<sub>25</sub>N<sub>3</sub>O, which is the molecular formula of prodigiosin.</p><p>FT-IR absorption of the pigment in KBr was at ν<sub>max</sub> 3406.91, 2928.02, 2852.17, 1624.86, 1539.83, 1454.07, 1240.98, 1117.75, 1071.29, 960.33 and 772.16. The absorption corresponded to the groups as follows: aromatic NH (3406.91), CH<sub>2</sub> (2928.02 and 2852.17), C = C (1624.86, 960.33 and 772.16), pyrrole skeleton (1539.83 and 1454.07), C-O-C (1240.98, 1117.75 and 1071.29).</p><p>The NMR chemical shifts of the pigment were as follows: <sup>1</sup>H-NMR (CDCl<sub>3</sub>, 600 MHz, ppm) δ 0.905 (3H, m), 1.294 (2H, s), 1.311 (2H, m), 1.522 (2H, t), 2.395 (2H, m), 2.565 (3H, s), 3.996 (3H, s), 6.066 (1H, d), 6.355 (1H, brd), 6.688</p><p>(1H, brd), 6.921 (1H, s), 6.965 (1H, s), 7.091 (1H, d), 12.579 (1H, brs) and 12.731 (1H, brs); and <sup>13</sup>C -NMR (CDCl<sub>3</sub>, 151 MHz, ppm) δ 13.74, 16.96, 22.54, 25.48, 29.71, 31.52, 52.47, 85.86, 108.69, 109.75, 112.32, 120.26, 122.77, 123.62, 124.09, 130.82, 136.22, 138.01, 157.63 and 162.83.</p><p>UV-Vis, TOFMS, FT-IR and NMR analyses suggested that the red pigment isolated from NS-17 was PG. The pigment structure is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Flask Culture</title><p>The strain NS-17 produced minimal red pigment in LB broth, weakly responded to supplementation with Tween-80 and oil and showed a high production of prodigiosin under the temperature of 30˚C - 32˚C, different from most reported S. marcescens strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref19">19</xref>] . The results of single-factor experiments are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, with the maximum values presented in bold. Experiments were carried out according to the order in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> with the factors optimized in the previous steps.</p><p>In the investigated factors and concentrations, the optimal conditions for NS-17 to produce prodigiosin were as follows: maltose 6 g /L; peptone 12 g /L; NaCl 1 g /L; KCl 2 g/L; Tween-80 1% (w/v); soybean oil 4% (w/v); pH of medium 8; inoculum size ≥ 1.5%; volume of medium in a 250 mL flask ≤ 50 mL; rotational rate ≥ 190 rpm; and cultivation temperature 32˚C. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the yield of prodigiosin according to time for an inoculum size of 1.5%, volume of medium of 50 mL and rotational rate of 190 rpm. The concentration of prodigiosin reached a relatively high value (60.51 mg/L) within 32 h of incubation, and the pH of the culture broth was stable at approximately 8.0, which is supposed to be good for the production of prodigiosin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.92040-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Oxygen supply significantly affected the concentration of prodigiosin in investigations of the volume of medium and rotational rate. Sufficient oxygen supplementation was the essential condition for prodigiosin fermentation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Continuous Fermentation</title><p>With a 250 rpm rotor speed and 1:1 ventilation ratio in a bioreactor (GUJS-50L, EASTBIO Ltd., China), a control growth culture was repeated three times under the optimized conditions of the flask culture with 5 g/L of propoxylated glycerin as a defoamer. Group 1 was carried out three times under the same conditions as those of the control group but with no defoamer, and Group 2 was carried out</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Single-factor experiments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1. Carbon sources</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon sources</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glycerol</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean oil</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amidulin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sucrose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tween-80</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2. Maltose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >concentration (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3. Nitrogen sources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen sources</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonium sulfate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ammonium oxalate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peptone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelatin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bean flour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >4. Peptone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >concentration (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5. NaCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >concentration (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >6. KCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >concentration (g/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7. Tween-80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >concentration (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >8. pH of medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >9. Inoculum size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inoculum size (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10. Volume of medium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume (mL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >11. Rotational rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rotational rate (rpm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >12. Cultivation temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PG (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>three times under the same conditions as those of the control group without a defoamer and with a feed medium that had a 5-fold higher nutrient concentration than that of the fermentation medium (with half the inorganic salt concentration) supplied at a flow rate of 8 mL/min according to the flow rate of the efflux foam. After 56 h of fermentation, the production of cells and PG was measured.</p><p>As the results show, the efflux foam contained a mass of cells and PG, and continuous fermentation could be successfully achieved with additional supplementation of medium. The efflux foam liquefied automatically in the collector, and the weight of the efflux broth is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The PG concentrations in the bioreactor and efflux broth are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>.</p><p>Because the process of foam collection was subject to contamination, the continuous fermentation stage of S. marcescens was restricted to less than 72 h, and no contamination occurred in 56 h.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>S. marcescens NS-17 isolated from soil produced a considerable amount of PG in a flask culture under the following conditions: maltose 6 g /L; peptone 12 g /L; NaCl 1 g /L; KCl 2 g/L; Tween-80 1% (w/v); pH 8; inoculum size ≥ 1.5%; and cultivation temperature 32˚C. Based on the foam flotation method, continuous fermentation was performed by removing the foam as soon as it reached the top of the bioreactor; the cells and PG were automatically concentrated in the foam, making the extraction easier and achieving a high production of PG. After 56 h of culture, the total cell harvest was enhanced 2.33-fold compared to that of batch fermentation, and the total amount of prodigiosin was enhanced 2.70-fold compared to that of batch fermentation. However, due to the risk of contamination, long-term culture remains a challenge.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Fujian Education and Scientific Research Project for Young and Middle-aged Teachers (JAT160639 and). We thank Professor Wei from Nanchang University for help in DNA sequencing and for useful discussions.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fu, Q., Xiao, Y.J., Duan, X.H., Huang, H.B., Zhuang, Z.X., Shen, J.H., Pei, Y.Y., Xu, H.J. and Gan, M.Y. (2019) Continuous Fermentation of a Prodigiosin-Producing Serratia marcescens Strain Isolated from Soil. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 10, 98-108. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2019.104007</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.92040-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giri, A.V., Anandkumar, N., Muthukumaran, G. and Pennathur, G. (2004) A Novel Medium for the Enhanced Cell Growth and Production of Prodigiosin from Serratia marcescens Isolated from Soil. BMC Microbiology, 4, 1-10.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-4-11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, M.-J., Bae, J., Lee, D.-S., Kim, C.-H., Kim, J.-S., Kim, S.-W. and Hong, S.-I. (2006) Purification and Characterization of Prodigiosin Produced by Integrated Bioreactor from Serratia sp. KH-95. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 101, 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cang, S., Sanada, M., Johdo, O., Ohta, S., Nagamatsu, Y. and Yoshimoto, A. (2000) High Production of Prodigiosin by Serratia marcescens Grown on Ethanol. Biotechnology Letters, 22, 1761-1765. 
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005646102723</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Someya, N., Nakajima, M., Hirayae, K., Hibi, T. and Akutsu, K. (2001) Synergistic Antifungal Activity of Chitinolytic Enzymes and Prodigiosin Produced by Biocontrol Bacterium, Serratia marcescens Strain B2 against Gray Mold Pathogen, Botrytis cinerea. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 67, 312-317.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castro, A.J. (1967) Antimalarial Activity of Prodigiosin. Nature, 213, 903-904. 
https://doi.org/10.1038/213903a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerber, N.N. (1975) Prodigiosin-Like Pigments. CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 3, 469-485. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408417509108758</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jeong, H., Yim, J.H., Lee, C., et al. (2005) Genomic Blueprint of Hahella chejuensis, a Marine Microbe Producing an Algicidal Agent. Nucleic Acids Research, 33, 7066-7073. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki1016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakashima, T., Miyazaki, Y., Matsuyama, Y., Muraoka, W., Yamaguchi, K. and Oda, T. (2006) Producing Mechanism of an Algicidal Compound against Red Tide Phytoplankton in a Marine Bacterium γ-proteobacterium. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 73, 684-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-006-0507-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Han, S.B., Kim, H.M., Kim, Y.H., et al. (1998) T-Cell Specific Immunosuppression by Prodigiosin Isolated from Serratia marcescens. International Journal of Immunopharmacology, 20, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0192-0561(97)00062-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D’Alessio, R., Bargiotti, A., Carlini, O., et al. (2000) Synthesis and Immunosuppressive Activity of Novel Prodigiosin Derivatives. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 43, 2557-2565. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm001003p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montaner, B. and Pérez-Tomás, R. (2001) Prodigiosin-Induced Apoptosis in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Life Sciences, 68, 2025-2036. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01002-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Llagostera, E., Soto-Cerrato, V., Joshi, R., et al. (2005) High Cytotoxic Sensitivity of the Human Small Cell Lung Doxorubicin-Resistant Carcinoma (GLC4/ADR) Cell Line to Prodigiosin through Apoptosis Activation. Anti-Cancer Drugs, 16, 393-399. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001813-200504000-00005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willenbacher, J., Zwick, M., Mohr, T., Schmid, F., Syldatk, C. and Hausmann, R. (2014) Evaluation of Different Bacillus Strains in Respect of Their Ability to Produce Surfactin in a Model Fermentation Process with Integrated Foam Fractionation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 9623-9632.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6010-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cui, X., Zhang, D., Zheng, H., Wu, Z.-L., Cui, S.-F. and Dong, K. (2014) Study on the Process of Fermentation Coupling with Foam Fractionation and Membrane Module for Nisin Production. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 9, 623-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.1794</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Williams, S.T., Sharpe, M.E. and Holt, J.G. (1989) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thomson, N.R., Crow, M.A., McGowan, S.J., Cox, A. and Salmond, G.P.C. (2000) Biosynthesis of Carbapenem Antibiotic and Prodigiosin Pigment in Serratia Is Under Quorum Sensing Control. Molecular Microbiology, 36, 539-556. 
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01872.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montaner, B., Navarro, S., Piqué, M., et al. (2000) Prodigiosin from the Supernatant of Serratia marcescens Induces Apoptosis in Haematopoietic Cancer Cell Lines. British Journal of Pharmacology, 131, 585-593.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0703614</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slater, H., Crow, M., Everson, L. and Salmond, G.P.C. (2003) Phosphate Availability Regulates Biosynthesis of Two Antibiotics, Prodigiosin and Carbapenem, in Serratia via Both Quorum-Sensing-Dependent and -Independent Pathways. Molecular Microbiology, 47, 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03295.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sole, M., Francia, A., Rius, N. and Lorén, J.G. (1997) The Role of pH in the “Glucose Effect” on Prodigiosin Production by Non-Proliferating Cells of Serratia marcescens. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 25, 81-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00171.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solé, M., Rius, N., Francia, A. and Lorén, J.G. (1994) The Effect of pH on Prodigiosin Production by Non-Proliferating Cells of Serratia marcescens. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 19, 341-344.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00470.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.92040-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solé, M., Rius, N. and Lorén, J.G. (2000) Rapid Extracellular Acidification Induced by Glucose Metabolism in Non-Proliferating Cells of Serratia marcescens. International Microbiology, 3, 39-43.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>