<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Marine Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7384</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojms.2019.92008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMS-91843</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  New Records of Marine Diatoms for the American Continent Found on Stone Scorpionfish Scorpaena mystes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Francisco</surname><given-names>O. López-Fuerte</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>David</surname><given-names>A. Siqueiros-Beltrones</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ulianov</surname><given-names>Jakes-Cota</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arturo</surname><given-names>Tripp-Valdéz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Departamento Académico de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Laboratorio de Sistemas Arrecifales, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento de Plancton y Ecología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Departamento de Pesquerías y Biología Marina, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, La Paz, México</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>02</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>98</fpage><lpage>112</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The survey of new benthic substrata is expected to yield new records of diatom taxa. A particular type of substratum is the skin of the Stone scorpionfish Scorpaena mystes Jordan &amp; Starks, 1895 that, because of its benthic form of life, represents a potential colonizing surface for various organisms, including epizoic and opportunistic diatom taxa (epibiotic community). Thus, a floristic survey of diatoms was carried out by sampling the epibiotic community from S. mystes specimens collected in the east coast of Baja California Sur (Gulf of California). Thirty diatoms are new records for Mexican littorals. Twelve of these taxa had not been hitherto recorded for American coasts. Micrographs, and morphometric and distribution data on these taxa are provided.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Epibiotic</kwd><kwd> Floristics</kwd><kwd> Mexican Littorals</kwd><kwd> Species Richness</kwd><kwd> Stone Scorpionfish</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A recent surge of floristic studies reviews on benthic diatoms from Mexican littorals has yielded an extensive species list [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref1">1</xref>] that has kept on growing on the basis of ex-professo studies, particularly for the Mexican northwestern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref3">3</xref>] . In this way, the survey of new substrata in the Mexican coasts promises still more new records of benthic diatom taxa. In particular, live substrata represent a rich source of epiphytic and epizoic diatoms. The latter comprises a wide array of host species that include invertebrates such as copepods, ciliates, bryozoans, hydrozoans, holothurians and vertebrates such as dolphins, whales, manatees and turtles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref5">5</xref>] . Out of these, the less studied is fish, and most research has been done on freshwater species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref10">10</xref>] . For the marine environment, and in particular for epizoic algae on fish, Ballantine et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref11">11</xref>] carried out the only study with three species of scorpaenids, recording only ten diatom taxa.</p><p>The body form of scorpaenids fishes provides them with camouflage, which is enhanced by skin ornaments, and a brown layer over the skin made from hydrozoans, filamentous algae, diatoms and other organisms that grow mainly on the cephalic region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref12">12</xref>] . Thus, the benthic habit of the stone fish Scorpaena mystes Jordan &amp; Starks, 1895, and its idleness, make it an ideal live substratum for testing various hypothesis on the relation animal host/epizoic diatom, but the scarcity of basic studies such as diatom floristics limits the spectrum of said hypotheses. However, several benefits have been noted for these epizoic diatoms, such as protection against grazing, availability of growing nutritional supplements, and an elevated position that also reduces the risk of being resuspended when growing on sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Current observations by the first author of a rich diatom flora found within the epibiotic community growing on S. mystes suggested that new taxa could be found on this poorly explored substrate. Thus, the objective of this paper is to report new records of diatom taxa for Mexican waters and the American continent from the epibiotic community of S. mystes specimens collected in the central zone of the east coast of the Gulf of California (Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Twenty scorpion-fish specimens were captured during April 2016 off the coast of Santa Rosalia, Baja California Sur, Mexico which is located at 27˚19'N, 112˚15'W (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Fish specimens were caught manually with hand-held spears using semi-autonomous diving equipment (hookah) at an approximate depth of 20 m. Specimens were identified as S. mystes following Grove and Lavenberg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Diatoms and other organisms (macroalgae mainly) were separated from the skin of the fishes using a tooth-brush to generate a compound sample from the twenty specimens. The brushed-off material was placed in a 250 mL flask and preserved in commercial 70% ethanol. Afterwards, in order to eliminate organic matter which would preclude visibility of the diatom frustules, the compound sample was oxidized by adding 3 mL of 70% nitric acid to 2 mL of sample, heating with a burner to boiling point and until emission of gas subsided indicating end of</p><p>reaction (ca. 3 min.). The oxidized sample was rinsed repeatedly with purified water until reaching a circumneutral pH. Then, twelve permanent slides were mounted using Zyrax<sup>&#174;</sup> (RI = 1.7) (made and distributed by Prof. Bill Daily of the University of Pennsylvania).</p><p>The mounted slides were observed under a Zeiss<sup>&#174;</sup> Axio Lab A1 compound microscope (Zeiss, Germany) with phase contrast optics and equipped with a Canon EOS Rebel T5i camera (Canon, Japan). Identification of the taxa was done specifically using the reference that appears in its corresponding description. A formal list of the diatom taxa was constructed following Round et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref17">17</xref>] , and including information on synonymy, references, distribution, and morphometrics, which in several taxa refer to a single found specimen. Nomenclatural updates were done according to AlgaeBase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref18">18</xref>] , the Catalogue of Diatom Names, California Academy of Sciences (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp), and http://www.marinespecies.org/ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Thirty benthic diatom taxa, including species and varieties, are presented here as new records for the Mexican littorals, along with twelve taxa not recorded before for the American continent. These taxa belong to the Bacillariophyceae (21 species), Coscinodiscophyceae (6 species), and Fragilariophyceae (3 species), that comprise nine orders, 14 families and 20 genera, with 30% of the species belonging to Amphora (6) and Navicula (3).</p><p>In what follows, taxonomic data, reference, synonymy, basionym, distribution, morphometric information, and illustrations are provided. Taxa without a previous record in the American continent are designated with an asterisk (*).</p><p>COSCINODISCOPHYCEAE Round &amp; Crawford</p><p>Order Biddulphiales Krieger</p><p>Family Biddulphiaceae K&#252;tzing</p><p>Biddulphia juncta (A. Schmidt) A. Mann* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>M)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 85 &#181;m; width 78 &#181;m; 3 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Triceratium junctum A. Schmidt, Amphipentas juncta (A. Schmidt) De Toni.</p><p>Literature. Schmidt’s Atlas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref20">20</xref>] , pl. 98, Figures 1-3 (as T. junctum A. Schmidt)</p><p>Distribution. Asia (China, Taiwan and Philippine Islands as T. junctum).</p><p>Biddulphiopsis membranacea (Cleve) von Stosch &amp; Simonsen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>J)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 101 &#181;m; width 48 &#181;m; 19 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Basionym. Biddulphia membranacea Cleve.</p><p>Literature. Stidolph et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref20">20</xref>] , pl. 21, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p><p>Distribution. South America (Colombia, Galapagos Islands), Barbados, Oceania (Guam), West Indian Archipelago and Africa (Mozambique).</p><p>Trigonium arcticum (Brightwell) Cleve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>B)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 111 &#181;m; width (side) 104 &#181;m; 19 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Triceratium arcticum Brightwell, Biddulphia arctica (Brightwell) Boyer.</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , pl. 104, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Stidolph et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref20">20</xref>] , pl. 7, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>39-140.</p><p>Distribution. Asia, Europe, Antarctic and subantarctic islands.</p><p>Comments. A marine littoral species, epiphytic or attached to various substrata.</p><p>Order Coscinodiscales</p><p>Family Coscinodiscaceae</p><p>Thalassiosira maculata cf. Fryxell &amp; Johansen (Figures 2C-E)</p><p>Morphometric data. diameter 22 &#181;m; 22 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Hustedt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref22">22</xref>] , p. 112, Figures 26-28, Foged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref23">23</xref>] , pl. 6, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Distribution. Antarctic, Africa.</p><p>Comments. This taxon is considered to be restricted to the southern hemisphere, frequently found in subantarctic and antarctic waters, becoming more abundant southward.</p><p>Shionodiscus bioculatus cf. (Grunow) Alverson, Kang &amp; Theriot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>N)</p><p>Morphometric data. diameter 70 &#181;m; 4 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Coscinodiscus bioculatus Grunow, Thalassiosira bioculata (Grunow) Ostenfeld, Coscinosira bioculata (Grunow) H. Heiden.</p><p>Literature. Hustedt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref24">24</xref>] , p. 331, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>68.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, Asia, Arctic, Canada.</p><p>Order Triceratiales Round &amp; Crawford</p><p>Family Triceratiaceae (Sch&#252;tt) Lemmermann</p><p>Amphitetras subrotundata Janisch (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>A)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 80 &#181;m; width 90 &#181;m; 4 areolae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Schmidt’s Atlas (1874-1959), pl. 99, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>4, Stidolph et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref20">20</xref>] , pl. 5, Figures 108-112.</p><p>Distribution. Asia, Europe, USA, Arctic.</p><p>FRAGILARIOPHYCEAE Round</p><p>Order Ardissoneales Round</p><p>Family Ardissoneaceae Round</p><p>Ardissonea fulgens var. gigantea (Lobarzewsky) De Toni (Figures 2K-2L)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 340 &#181;m; width 13 &#181;m; 18 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Synedra gigantea Lobarzewsky.</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , pl. 79, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> [as Synedra fulgens var. gigantea (Lobarzewsky) H. Peragallo &amp; M. Peragallo], Lobban &amp; Schefter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref20">20</xref>] , pl. 1, 16, Figures 1-2, 6-8.</p><p>Distribution. South America (Brazil), Oceania (Guam), Gulf of Mexico Krayesky et al. 2009.</p><p>Order Rhaphoneidales Round</p><p>Family Rhaphoneidaceae Forti</p><p>Rhaphoneis hungarica Pantocsek (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>F &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>G)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 28.33 &#181;m; width 9.16 &#181;m; 8 - 9 striae radiating in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Sceptroneis hungarica (Pantocsek) G. Andrews.</p><p>Literature. Pantocsek, J. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref25">25</xref>] , Teil I, p. 34; pl. 3, 25, pl. 25, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>24; pl. 3 <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig30"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>0</xref>.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA.</p><p>Order Striatellales Round</p><p>Family Striatellaceae K&#252;tzing</p><p>Grammatophora undulata var. gallopagensis Grunow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>H &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>I)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 125 &#181;m; width 11 &#181;m, Van Heurck [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref26">26</xref>] report 27 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Van Heurck, H. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref26">26</xref>] , pl. 53 bis, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0.</p><p>Distribution. Europe (Belgium).</p><p>Comments. In both data bases consulted, AlgaeBase and Worms the status of this taxon is considered uncertain (unassessed).</p><p>BACILLARIOPHYCEAE Haeckel</p><p>Order Achnanthales Silva</p><p>Family Achnanthaceae K&#252;tzing</p><p>Achnanthes apiculata (Greville) Riaux-Gobin, Comp&#232;re, Hinz &amp; Ector* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>A &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>B)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 28 - 47 &#181;m; width 17 - 26 &#181;m, Rapheless valve: (9) 11 - 12 striae in 10 &#181;m, Raphe valve: 18 - 20 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Stauroneis apiculata Greville</p><p>Literature. Riaux-Gobin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref27">27</xref>] , p. 111; Figures 1, 58-61.</p><p>Distribution. USA. Cuba, Africa.</p><p>Comments. According to Riaux-Gobin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref27">27</xref>] this taxon may belong to the genus, Schizostauron, however, they choose Achnanthes after Ross [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref28">28</xref>] , who</p><p>includes the Schizostauron forms in Achnanthes. Thus, we decided for Achnanthes apiculata, as proposed by Riaux-Gobin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Order Naviculales Bessey</p><p>Family Diploneidaceae D. G. Mann</p><p>Diploneis ingens (A. Mann) Van Landingham* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>A)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 105 &#181;m; width 59 &#181;m; 7 - 8 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Navicula ingens Mann.</p><p>Literature. Mann, A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref29">29</xref>] p. 105; pl. 22, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> (as Navicula ingens Mann).</p><p>Distribution. Philippine Islands.</p><p>Family Amphipleuraceae Grunow</p><p>Halamphora subangularis cf. (Hustedt) Levkov (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>C)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 38 &#181;m; width 9 &#181;m; 9 - 10 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Amphora subangularis Hustedt.</p><p>Literature. Levkov, Z. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref30">30</xref>] , vol. 5, pl. 110, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5; Hustedt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref22">22</xref>] , p. 39, pl. 13: 16-17; Simonsen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref31">31</xref>] , p. 628: 1-2; both as Amphora subangularis Hustedt.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA.</p><p>Comments. Siqueiros Beltrones et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref32">32</xref>] , figure 164, reported a specimen as Amphora angulosa Gregory, albeit for the Pacific coast of the Baja Peninsula that coincides in all morphological traits with Levkov’s description and ours. Hustedt’s description, however, reports 22 - 23 striae/10 &#181;m.</p><p>Family Diadesmidaceae D. G. Mann</p><p>Caloneis egena (A. Schmidt) Cleve (Figures 3F-H)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 25 &#181;m; width 5.8 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Navicula egena A. Schmidt.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 164, pl. 160, Figures 13-14.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, Oceania, Gulf of Mexico, Thailand.</p><p>Caloneis liber var. umbilicata cf. (Grunow) Cleve* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>K)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 145 &#181;m; width 22 &#181;m; 10 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Basionym. Navicula maxima var. umbilicata Grunow.</p><p>Synonyms. Navicula liber var. umbilicata (Grunow) Grunow.</p><p>Literature. Cleve, P. T. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref34">34</xref>] , 26(2): 1-194, p. 55, pl. 5.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, Caribbean sea (Puerto Rico).</p><p>Family Naviculaceae K&#252;tzing</p><p>Navicula halinae Witkowski* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>L)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 68 &#181;m; width 8 &#181;m; 11 - 12 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 281, pl. 130 Figures 1-4.</p><p>Distribution. Africa (Atlantic coast of Namibia).</p><p>Navicula permulsa Hustedt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>M)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 60 &#181;m; width 15 &#181;m; 5 - 6 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Schmidt’s Atlas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref35">35</xref>] , pl. 394, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>2.</p><p>Distribution. South America (Galapagos).</p><p>Comments. Although only the cingular bands are depicted in the plates, complete valves were observed and measured, but could not be found again for photographic recording.</p><p>Navicula transitans Cleve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>D)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 75 &#181;m; width 18 &#181;m; 7 - 8 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 309, pl. 127, Figures 6-8.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, North America (USA, Canada), Indian Ocean, West Africa and Russia.</p><p>Seminavis basilica cf. Danielidis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>M)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 68 &#181;m; width 9 &#181;m; 28 - 30 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m, 30 - 32 ventral striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Danielidis &amp; Mann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref36">36</xref>] , p. 22, Figures 1-19.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA.</p><p>Trachyneis aspera var. robusta (Petit) Cleve* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>F)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 50 - 62 &#181;m; width 20 - 25 &#181;m; 11 - 12 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Stauroneis robusta Petit.</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] : p. 151, pl. 29, Figures 8-9 (as Trachyneis robusta Petit).</p><p>Distribution. Europe (New Zealand, Italy).</p><p>Trachyneis aspera var. oblonga (J. W. Bailey) Cleve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>B)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 168 &#181;m; width 39 &#181;m; 9 - 10 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Basionym. Stauroptera oblonga J. W. Bailey.</p><p>Synonyms. Trachyneis oblonga (J. W. Bailey) H. Peragallo &amp; M. Peragallo, Stauroneis oblonga (Bailey) Ralfs.</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , p. 192, pls. 25-48.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, Canada.</p><p>Family Pleurosigmataceae Mereschowsky</p><p>Gyrosigma hummii Hustedt* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>C)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 99 &#181;m; width 17 &#181;m; 14-15 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Hustedt, F. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref22">22</xref>] , p.33, pl. 10, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Distribution. USA.</p><p>Pleurosigma delicatulum W. Smith* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>K)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 226 &#181;m; width 26 &#181;m; 10 - 11 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Gyrosigma delicatulum (W. Smith) Griffith &amp; Henfrey, Pleurosigma angulatum var. delicatulum (W. Smith) van Heurck.</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , p. 166, pl. 32, Figures 14-15.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA, Canada, South America (Brazil, Colombia) Africa, Asia.</p><p>Pleurosigma patagonicum (Ferrario &amp; Sar) Sterrenburg &amp; Sar var. paucistriatum Sar, Sterrenburg &amp; Sunesen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>E)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 128 &#181;m; width 12 &#181;m; 20 - 21 transversal striae in 10 &#181;m, 16 - 17 oblique striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Sar, E. U, Sterrenburg, F.A.S., A. S. Lavigne &amp; I. Sunesen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref37">37</xref>] . Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 48(1): 17-51.</p><p>Distribution. South America (Argentina).</p><p>Order Surirellales</p><p>Family Surirellaceae K&#252;tzing</p><p>Coronia decora (Br&#233;bisson) Ruck &amp; Guiry (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>H &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>J)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 34 &#181;m; width 35 &#181;m; 7 - 8 ribs in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Campylodiscus decorus Br&#233;bisson.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 412, pl. 214, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, Stidolph (1980), p. 403, pl. 14, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0; Lobban et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref38">38</xref>] , p. 469, pl. 64, Figures 5-6 (in all cases as C. decorus Br&#233;bisson).</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA, South America, Asia, Oceania.</p><p>Order Thalassiophysales D. G. Mann</p><p>Family Catenulaceae Mereschkowski</p><p>Amphora arcus Gregory* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>I &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>J)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 116 - 121 &#181;m; width 5 - 9 &#181;m; 11 - 13 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Sensu Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 129, pl. 165 <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5.</p><p>Distribution. Europe.</p><p>Amphora arcuata A. Schmidt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>O)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 75 &#181;m; width 13 &#181;m; 15 - 16 striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Synonyms. Amphora acuta var. arcuata (A. Schmidt) Cleve.</p><p>Literature. Schmidt et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref35">35</xref>] , pl. 26, Figures 27-29; Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , pl. 49, Figures 27, 28.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, USA, Oceania, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands.</p><p>Amphora compacta A. Mann* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>G)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 174 &#181;m; width 26 &#181;m; 7 - 8 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m, 8 - 9 ventral striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Mann, A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref29">29</xref>] , p. 19; pl. 3, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p>Distribution. Philippine Islands.</p><p>Amphora cymbamphora Cholnoky* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>L)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 9 &#181;m; width 5 &#181;m; 14 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m, 15 - 16 ventral striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 136, pl. 164, Figures 26-28.</p><p>Distribution. Oceania, South Africa, Baltic Sea.</p><p>Amphora formosa var. studeri Janisch* (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>D &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>E)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 71 - 89 &#181;m; width 9 - 13 &#181;m; 14 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m, 13 - 14 ventral striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Basionym. Amphora studeri Janisch</p><p>Literature. Peragallo &amp; Peragallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref21">21</xref>] , p. 214; pl. 47, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8.</p><p>Distribution. Europe.</p><p>Amphora helenensis Giffen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>N)</p><p>Morphometric data. Length 12 &#181;m; frustule width 9 &#181;m; valve width 3 &#181;m; 20 - 21 dorsal striae in 10 &#181;m, 18 - 19 ventral striae in 10 &#181;m.</p><p>Literature. Witkowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref33">33</xref>] , p. 140, pl. 163, Figures 31-33.</p><p>Distribution. Europe, South Africa, Atlantic, Canada, Oceania.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The relative high number of new records for Mexican littorals and those that are new for the whole American continent (12), indicate that much work is yet to be done on floristics of benthic marine diatom. Thus, further surveys that include new substrata where these microalgae may thrive will eventually yield a reliable basis to undertake related studies on ecology and biogeography, both at regional and at worldwide scale. A balance between these findings and an analysis of the overall species richness currently underway, will surely permit addressing questions such as, are exclusively epizoic diatom aggregations lacking on these fish? What characteristics favor the establishment of unique epizoic diatom aggregations? And, how do these rich diatom aggregations compare floristically with hosts from other localities?</p><p>Due to the relevance currently recognized on biodiversity data in terms of conservation policy and potential anthropogenic impact in Mexico and worldwide, species inventories are regaining attention. Studies on benthic diatoms, and in particular those on benthic forms, exhibit an underestimation of their geographic distribution, both regionally and worldwide, that is a function of the lack of research, which undermines the reliability of biogeographical analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref34">34</xref>] . For example, Biddulphia juncta (A. Schmidt) A. Mann (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>M), Achnanthes apiculata (Greville) Riaux-Gobin, Comp&#232;re, Hinz &amp; Ector (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>A, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>B), Diploneis ingens (Mann) Van Landingham (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>A), Amphora compacta A. Mann (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>G), and Navicula permulsa Hustedt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>J) had been recorded for a single continent. Several of these for the Philippine Islands, bringing into mind the observation by Mann [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref29">29</xref>] on the striking similarity between the diatom flora of these islands and the coasts of Campeche, Mexico. His main concern was the remoteness and isolation between these localities. Our study poses similar questions which require ex-professo biogeographical theory.</p><p>Derived from this and other recent efforts on the floristics of benthic diatoms from Mexican coasts, the list of new records incorporated to the overall checklist by L&#243;pez-Fuerte and Siqueiros-Beltrones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref1">1</xref>] has increased substantially up to 88 from 2013 to 2017, and to 329 new regional records for the coasts of the Baja California Peninsula from 1999 to date. On a worldwide basis these inventories account for just &gt;1% of the total diatoms recorded for the whole planet, and around 3.3% of the species recorded for Mexico [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref37">37</xref>] . Thus, if we considered that most of the littorals in Mexico have not been surveyed for benthic diatoms, it is to be expected that the species richness is considerably higher. This may be supported by the fact that the recent new records mentioned above originate from previously unexplored areas, such as the Mexican Caribbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref38">38</xref>] and from the Mexican NW [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref39">39</xref>] , as well as from unexplored substrata such as blades of the kelp Eisenia arborea Areschoug [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91843-ref32">32</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The new records of taxa collected from the skin of the stonefish in this study are more indicative of scarce floristic research than as representatives of an epizoic relation, i.e. a product of an increasing survey comprising many more substrates and regions. Also, they inhabit a compound substrate where the main component is the skin of the fish, but other forms such as macroalgae and invertebrates are surely attached to it and diatoms to them, thus making up an epibiotic community. Moreover, many of the recorded taxa have been observed on other substrata elsewhere and may not be considered epizoic sensu stricto but are opportunistic as are the general natures of benthic diatoms. Notwithstanding the later, said taxa have not hitherto been recorded elsewhere for Mexican littorals and constitute new additions to the benthic diatom flora of the region, inasmuch as many of the recorded taxa have been observed on other substrata found elsewhere.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge the support given by the Universidad Aut&#243;noma de Baja California Sur, for the processing of the samples. FOLF thanks the support of the SNI-CONACYT Programs. The second author (DASB) is COFAA and EDI fellow of the Instituto Polit&#233;cnico Nacional.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>L&#243;pez-Fuerte, F.O., Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A., Jakes-Cota, U. and Tripp-Vald&#233;z, A. (2019) New Records of Marine Diatoms for the American Continent Found on Stone Scorpionfish Scorpaena mystes (Scorpaenidae) in Mexican Shores. Open Journal of Marine Science, 9, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojms.2019.92008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.91843-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-Fuerte, F.O. and Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. (2016) A Checklist of Marine Benthic Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from México. Phytotaxa, 283, 201-258. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.283.3.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Estrada-Gutiérrez, K.M., Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. and Hernández-Almeida, O.U. (2017) New Records of Benthic Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) for Mexico in the Nayarit Littoral. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 88, 985-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.10.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. and Argumedo-Hernández, U. (2017) New Records of Benthic Marine Diatom Taxa for Mexican Littorals. CICIMAR Oceánides, 32, 59-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Tiffany, M.A. (2011) Epizoic and Epiphytic Diatoms. In: Seckbach, J. and Kociolek, J.P., Eds., The Diatom World, Springer, New York, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1327-7_8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Robinson, N.J., Majewska, R., Lazo-Wasem, E.A., Nel, R., Paladino, F.V., Rojas, L., Zardus, J.D. and Pinou, T. (2016) Epibiotic Diatoms Are Universally Present on All Sea Turtle Species. PLoS ONE, 11, e0157011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vinyard</surname><given-names> W.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1953</year>)<article-title>Epizoophytic Algae from Mollusks, Turtles, and Fish in Oklahoma</article-title><source> Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science</source><volume> 34</volume>,<fpage> 63</fpage>-<lpage>65</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nigrelli, R.F., McLaughlin, J.J. and Jakowska, S. (1958) Histozoic Algal Growth in Fish. Copeia, 4, 331-333. https://doi.org/10.2307/1439971</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoffman, G.L. (1976) Parasites of North American Freshwater Fishes. University California Press, Berkeley, 486 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, J.W. and Ballantine, D.L. (1972) Opercular Algal Growth on the Cichlid Fish Tilapia aurea Cultured in Sea Water. Aquaculture, 4, 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(74)90024-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millstein, J. (1998) Observations of Skin Sloughing in the Crested Sculpin (Blepsias bilobus). Copeia, 3, 743-745. https://doi.org/10.2307/1447807</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ballantine, D.L., Navarro, J.N. and Hensley, D.A. (2001) Algal Colonization of Caribbean Scorpionfishes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 69, 1089-1094.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fishelson, L. (1973) Observations on Skin Structure and Sloughing in the Stone Fish Synanceja verrucosa and Related Fish Species as a Functional Adaptation to Their Mode of Life. Zeitschrift fur Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, 140, 497-508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00306676</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Round, F.E. (1981) The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 653 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaevskii, N.A., Kolmakov, V.I., Dubovskaya, O.P. and Klimova, E.P. (2004) Interrelations of Epibiontic Microalgae and Crustacean Zooplankton under Conditions of a Blooming Eutrophic Water Body. Russian Journal of Ecology, 35, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RUSE.0000011107.72097.1c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romagnoli, T., Bavestrello, G., Cucchiari, E., De Stefano, M., Di Camillo, C., Pennesi, C., Puce, S. and Totti, C. (2007) Microalgal Communities Epibiontic on the Marine Hydroid Eudendrium racemosum in the Ligurian Sea, during an Annual Cycle. Marine Biology, 151, 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0487-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grove, J.S. and Lavenberg, R.J. (1997) The Fishes of the Galápagos Islands. Stanford University Press. Stanford, 863 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Round, F.E., Crawford, R.M. and Mann, D.G. (1990) The Diatoms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 747 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guiry, M.D. and Guiry, G.M. (2019) Algaebase. World-Wide Electronic Publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WoRMS Editorial Board (2019) World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stidolph, S.R., Sterrenburg, F.A.S., Smith, K.E.L. and Kraberg, A. (2012) Stuart R. Stidolph Diatom Atlas. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1163</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Peragallo, H. and Peragallo, M. (1897-1908) Diatomées Marines de France et des Districts Maritimes Voisins. In: Tempère, J., Ed., Micrographe-Editeur, à Grez-sur-Loing, 491 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hustedt, F. (1955) Marine Littoral Diatoms of Beaufort, North Carolina. Vol. 6, Bulletin Duke University Marine Station, Duke University Press, Durham, 1-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foged, N. (1975) Some Littoral Diatoms from the Coasts of Tanzania. Cramer. Vaduz, 127 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hustedt, F. (1930) Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: Pascher, A., Ed., Die Süsswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas, Gustav Fischer, Jena. Zweite Auflage. Heft 10. 466 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pantocsek, J. (1886) Beitr&amp;#228ge zur Kenntnis der Fossilen Bacillarien Ungarns. Teil I, Marine Bacillarien. Nagy-Tapolcsány, Buchdrucherei von Julius Platzko, 74 p. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14916</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Heurck, H. (1880) Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Atlas. Ducaju &amp; Cie, Anvers, Belgium, 120 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riaux-Gobin, C., Compère, P., Hinz, F. and Ector, L. (2015) Achnanthes citronella, A. trachyderma comb. nov. (Bacillariophyta) and Allied Taxa Pertaining to the Same Morphological Group. Phytotaxa, 227, 101-119. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.227.2.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, R. (1963) The Diatom Genus Capartogramma and the Identity of Schizostauron. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Botany, 3, 47-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mann</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1925</year>)<article-title>Marine Diatoms of the Philippine Islands</article-title><source> Bulletin of the United States National Museum</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>182</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levkov, Z., Krstic, S., Metzeltin, D. and Nakov, T. (2007) Diatoms of Lakes Prespa and Ohrid (Macedonia). Iconographia Diatomologica, 16, 1-613.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simonsen, R. (1962) Untersuchungen zur Systematik und &amp;#214kologie der Bodendiatomeen der westlichen Ostsee. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, Systematische, Beihefte, 1, 1-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. and Argumedo-Hernández, U. (2014) Quasi Monospecific Proliferation of Pteroncola inane (Giffen) Round (Fragilariales; Bacillariophyceae) on Blades of Eisenia arborea Areschoug. CICIMAR Oceánides, 29, 57-62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Witkowski, A., Lange-Bertalot, H. and Metzeltin, D. (2000) Diatom Flora of Marine Coasts. In: Lange-Bertalot, H., Ed., Iconographia Diatomologica, Koeltz Scientific Books, K&amp;#246nigstein, 1-925.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vanormelingen, P., Cottenie, K., Michels, E., Muylaert, K., Vyverman, W. and de Meester, L. (2008) The Relative Importance of Dispersal and Local Processes in Structuring Phytoplankton Communities in a Set of Highly Interconnected Ponds. Freshwater Biology, 53, 2170-2183.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schmidt, A., Schmidt, M.V., Fricke, F.V., Heiden, H., Muller, O. and Hustedt, F. (1874-1959) Atlas der diatomaceenkunde, Heft 1-120, Tafeln 1-460. Reisland, Leipzig.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fourtanier, E. and Kociolek, J.P. (2017) Catalogue of Diatom Names, California Academy of Sciences. http://research.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mann, D.G. (1999) The Species Concept in Diatoms. Phycologia, 38, 437-495. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-38-6-437.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-Fuerte, F.O., Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. and Hernández-Almeida, O.U. (2013) Epiphytic Diatoms of Thalassia testudinum in Yala-hau Lagoon, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Marine Biodiversity Records, 6, e107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267213000857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91843-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-Fuerte, F.O., Siqueiros-Beltrones, D.A. and Yabur, R. (2015) First Record of Benthic Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae and Fragilariophyceae) from Isla Guadalupe, Baja California, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 86, 281-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2015.04.016</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>