<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJMB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Molecular Biology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-6620</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajmb.2019.92005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJMB-91794</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modification of Periodate Oxidation Method to Produce HRP-IgG Conjugate and Test its Stability Overtime
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nataliia</surname><given-names>Pavliuchenko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Victoria</surname><given-names>Hazarnian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcel</surname><given-names>Bassil</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Rafic Hariri University Campus, Hadath, Lebanon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Biotechnology Department, Benta Pharma Industries, Dbayeh, Lebanon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>16,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Goat anti-Rabbit Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) secondary conjugate was produced using a modified periodate oxidation method. The obtained conjugate was tested in the quality control techniques of therapeutic proteins. To determine the working dilution, titration of the prepared conjugate was performed in Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and found to be 1:5000. This dilution was further tested in Western Blot analysis. The secondary conjugate was kept at 4&amp;#176;C for one month and its stability was verified by Western Blot and Indirect ELISA techniques. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Antibody</kwd><kwd> Conjugation</kwd><kwd> Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)</kwd><kwd> Indirect ELISA</kwd><kwd>  Periodate-Mediated Glycoprotein Oxidation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Primary and secondary antibodies are used for detection and quantification of antigens in immunoassays such as ELISA, Western Blotting and immunohistochemistry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref1">1</xref>] . Antibodies can be labeled with a variety of molecules such as biotin, fluorescent tags, radioactive molecules, and enzymes such as Horseradish Peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase, glucose oxidase, and β-galactosidase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref4">4</xref>] . Horseradish Peroxidase is the most common enzyme used for conjugation because it is a small molecule, not expensive, stable and highly detectable chromogenic, chemiluminescent and fluorogenic substrates are available [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Many HRP-IgG conjugation methods are available, such as glutaraldehyde, cyanuric chloride, p-benzoquinone, maleimide methods, periodate oxidation, etc. Some of the advantages of using periodate oxidation method are as follows: it is a simple and cheap method that results in many aldehyde groups available for coupling, and also no side reactions are present, and antibodies can be used without previous modification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Conjugation of enzymes to antibodies involves the formation of a stable, covalent linkage between the two molecules; such coupling is achieved using a cross-linking agent, which reacts with the functional groups present in both enzymes and antibodies. Functional groups in proteins include amino, imino, hydroxyl, thiol and phenol groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Periodate mediated conjugation of HRP to the antibody (first described by Nakane and Kawaoi, 1974) is one of the most popular, simple methods to prepare conjugates that can be used in enzyme immunoassays. This method is based on Sodium periodate oxidation of carbohydrate side chains of HRP, followed by activation of Schiff base between activated peroxidase and amino groups of the antibody. The stable conjugate formed is after the reduction of the Schiff base by Sodium Borohydride [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Enzyme-labeled antibodies can be used in the pharmaceutical industry for the quality control of therapeutic proteins, such as Erythropoietin.</p><p>In this study, Goat anti-Rabbit antibodies were labeled with Horseradish peroxidase using periodate oxidation method. Micro-concentration of HRP-Sodium Periodate solution was done to remove the excess of periodate in order to simplify and accelerate the first step of conjugation. The reduction of the Schiff base of HRP-IgG conjugate by Sodium Borohydride was tested by incubating the solution for 90 minutes and overnight before final dialysis of labeled Ab. The Western Blot and ELISA results showed no significant difference between conjugates stabilized for 90 minutes and overnight.</p><p>In addition, the results obtained from Indirect ELISA and Western Blot techniques of Erythropoietin, using conjugated secondary antibodies showed that prepared conjugates were effective and stable for 1 month at +4˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Purification of IgG</title><p>Antibodies from lyophilized Goat Anti-Rabbit serum were manually purified by affinity chromatography using Pierce™ Chromatography Cartridges Protein G (Thermo Scientific). IgGs were eluted by Glycine buffer (pH 2.5) followed by pH adjustment with Tris-HCl (1 M, pH 8.5), and obtained fractions were stored at −20˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref10">10</xref>] . Two fractions (20 mg/ml and 8.23 mg/ml) were tested in SDS-PAGE, and one fraction (20 mg/ml) was chosen for the conjugation process.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. IgG Purity by SDS-PAGE</title><p>SDS-PAGE in reducing conditions was performed to assure that no degradation occurred during the storage of purified antibodies. Briefly, one control (dialyzed against PBS) and two purified IgG fractions were tested. Samples were mixed with 2&#215; reducing Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad) and boiled for 5 min. Electrophoresis was done in a 10% SDS-PAGE gel using Mini-Protean&#174; Tetra Vertical Electrophoresis Cell (Bio-Rad) at 170 V for 90 minutes. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (Bio-Rad).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Determining the Concentration of the Antibody</title><p>The measurement of the IgG fraction absorbance was performed by Double Beam Spectrophotometer 6850 (Jenway&#174;), with a reading range between 250 - 400 nm. IgG sample was diluted 20 times with ddH2O and the absorbance was measured against ddH2O. IgG concentration was calculated using the extinction coefficient of goat IgG.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Dialysis of Antibodies Used for Conjugation</title><p>Dialysis of the antibody sample was performed using Micro Float-A-Lyzer&#174; Dialysis Device, (8 - 10 kDa MWCO Spectra/ Por). 150 &#181;L of antibody sample was mixed with 50 &#181;L of Carbonate buffer (10 mM, pH 9.5) and dialyzed against 1 L of Carbonate buffer (10 mM, pH 9.5) at +4˚C with three buffer changes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Determining the Concentration and Amount of Antibody after Dialysis</title><p>Absorbance of dialyzed antibodies was measured to determine the final amount of the IgG to be used for conjugation. IgG sample was diluted 10 times in Carbonate buffer (10 mM, pH 9.5) and the absorbance was measured against Carbonate buffer (10 mM, pH = 9.5). IgG concentration was calculated using the extinction coefficient of goat IgG.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. SDS-PAGE of Dialyzed IgG</title><p>To confirm that no degradation occurred during dialysis, SDS-PAGE in reducing and non-reducing conditions was done.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. HRP-IgG Conjugation</title><p>Conjugation was performed using a 1:1 (w/w) ratio of HRP:IgG by modified periodate-mediated oxidation method. 100 &#181;L of freshly prepared 0.1 M Sodium (meta) periodate (Sigma-Aldrich S1878) solution was added to 500 &#181;L of Horseradish peroxidase solution (4 mg/mL), type VI-A (Sigma-Aldrich P6782); the color changed from reddish brown to green. The solution was stirred gently on a shaker for 20 minutes at room temperature in dark. To remove the excess of periodate, micro-concentration of the periodate-HRP solution was performed using Omega™ membrane Nanosep&#174; Centrifugal Devices (MWCO 10 K, Pall) at 8000 rpm for 3 &#215; 10 minutes. Sodium acetate buffer (1 mM, pH 4.4) was added to a final volume of 250 &#181;L and the pH was adjusted to 9.5 by adding 10 &#181;L of Sodium Carbonate buffer (0.2 M, pH 9.5). IgG solution (~2 mg/250 &#181;L) was added to the activated HRP solution. The mixture was stirred gently on a shaker for 2 hours at room temperature. 50 &#181;L of freshly prepared 0.1 M Sodium Borohydride (Sigma-Aldrich 213462) solution was added to the HRP-IgG mixture. The sample was divided into two fractions: the first fraction (250 &#181;L) was incubated with sodium borohydride for 90 minutes at room temperature with gentle shaking, and the second fraction (250 &#181;L) was incubated with sodium borohydride overnight at +4˚C. Both fractions were later dialyzed against 1 &#215; PBS (pH 7.2) at +4˚C. The volume retrieved after dialysis from both methods was 100 &#181;L HRP-IgG conjugate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Titration of the Conjugate</title><p>Indirect ELISA was carried out by coating the microplate with 1 &#181;g/100 &#181;L/well of Erythropoietin in Carbonate buffer (0.1 M, pH = 9.6) and the plate was incubated at +4˚C overnight. The next morning, the coating buffer was discarded and 200 &#181;L of blocking solution 1% BSA in PBST (PBS, pH 7.2 with 0.05% Tween-20) was added, the microplate was covered and kept at room temperature for 2 hours. Then, the blocking buffer was discarded and 100 &#181;L of primary rabbit polyclonal anti-Erythropoietin antibodies (1 mg/mL diluted 1:10,000 in PBST) were added into wells A to E. 100 &#181;L of PBST was added into well F which was used as a Blank. The microplate was incubated at 37˚C. After 2 hours, manual wash with PBST was performed three times and 100 &#181;L of secondary antibodies (either stabilized for 90 minutes or overnight with sodium borohydride) were added to A to F wells as follows: 1:200, 1:1000, 1:5000, 1:10,000, 1:20,000, and 1:50,000.</p><p>The microplate was incubated at 37˚C for 1 hour, and then washed manually five times with PBST. 100 &#181;L TMB (Sigma T0440) was added and the microplate was kept at room temperature for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 100 &#181;L of stopping solution (1 M HCl), and the Optical Density was read at 450 nm via Spectramax 340PC384 Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices).</p></sec><sec id="s2_9"><title>2.9. Western Blot Analysis of Erythropoietin</title><p>Erythropoietin (10 &#181;g/well) was loaded into 14% SDS-PAGE gel in reducing and non-reducing conditions. Reducing samples were boiled for 5 minutes. The proteins were transferred on a nitrocellulose membrane by semi-dry Western Blot technique using Trans-Blot&#174; Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad) at 25 V, 1.3 A, 45 min. The membrane was blocked by 5% BSA at +4˚C overnight. The blocking solution was discarded and 10 mL primary rabbit polyclonal anti-Erythropoietin antibodies (1 mg/mL diluted 1:10,000 in PBST) solution was added and incubated at room temperature for 2 hours with agitation. The membrane was washed three times with PBST and 10 mL of secondary antibody solution (1:5000 in PBST of both conjugates either stabilized for 90 minutes and overnight with sodium borohydride) was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with agitation. The membrane was washed three times with PBST and stained with TMB (Sigma T0565) for the membranes for 20 minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_10"><title>2.10. One-Month Stability</title><p>Indirect ELISA and Western Blot analysis were performed to test the stability of Goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies conjugates at working dilution 1:5000. For Indirect ELISA, two conjugates were used as positive controls: conjugates from June 2017 and October 2017 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref10">10</xref>] , both prepared using Lightning-Link&#174; HRP antibody labeling kit and diluted 1:5000 in LifeXtend solution (Expedeon).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>SDS-PAGE was done to determine the purity of two eluted fractions of antibodies in reduced conditions. The results showed two bands of each loaded IgG fraction and control sample of molecular weights ~25 and 50 kDa which correspond to the light and heavy chains of antibodies, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Measurement of IgG absorbance before dialysis was performed by spectrophotometer at λ = 278 nm and concentration was calculated using the formula: Cmg/ml = Abs278/1.3 &#215; dilution factor (where 1.3 is the extinction coefficient of goat IgG), the sample was diluted 20 times. Abs278 = 1.381 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The Concentration of IgG was 21.25 mg/ml.</p><p>The concentration of IgG after dialysis was calculated using measured Abs at 278 nm, C = 8.37 mg/ml.</p><p>SDS-PAGE results of dialyzed IgG showed that no degradation occurred during dialysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The optimum dilution of HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG was determined in Indirect ELISA and found to be 1:5000 for both conjugates, whether stabilized for 90 minutes or incubated overnight with Sodium Borohydride. Absorbance readings of Endpoint Assay are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Western Blot analysis revealed thick bands of non-reducing and reducing samples of Erythropoietin (30.5 kDa) incubated with HRP-IgG conjugate stabilized 90 minutes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>: Lanes 2-5) and HRP-IgG conjugate stabilized overnight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>: Lanes 6-7).</p><p>Also after protein transfer, nitrocellulose membrane stained with Ponceau Red showed bands corresponding to Erythropoietin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)), whereas no bands were present on SDS-PAGE gel stained with CBB, which confirms that the transfer was successful (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Optical density results for titration of prepared conjugates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >G</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dilution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:5000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:10,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:20,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1:50,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OD450 Row 1 (Conjugate Stabilized 90 min)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.705</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.568</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.146</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OD450 Row 2 (Conjugate Stabilized Overnight)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.798</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.160</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Indirect ELISA results confirmed that conjugates either stabilized for 90 minutes or overnight with Sodium Borohydride are stable after 1 month at +4˚C. Optical Density was measured using TMB as a substrate and the results of Endpoint Assay were determined on ELISA microplate reader. Absorbance readings are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Optical density results of one-month stability of the conjugates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary Conjugates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >In-House 90min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >In-House 90min</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >In-House Overnight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >In-House Overnight</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absorbance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.677</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary Conjugates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June 2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June 2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >October 2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >October 2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blank</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absorbance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.944</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>For the one-month stability Western Blot analysis revealed bands of non-reducing and reducing samples of Erythropoietin (30.5 kDa), whether membrane was incubated with HRP-IgG conjugate stabilized 90 minutes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a): Lanes 2-5) or HRP-IgG conjugate stabilized overnight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b): Lanes 6-7).</p><p>Also, after protein transfer, nitrocellulose membrane stained with Ponceau Red showed bands corresponding to Erythropoietin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)), whereas no bands were present on SDS-PAGE gel stained with CBB, which confirms that the transfer was successful (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Affinity purified Goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used for this research. SDS-PAGE was performed to assure that no degradation occurred during the storage of antibodies. The difference in the number of bands is attributed to sample preparation, which involves breakage of disulfide bonds of the antibody using 2-mercaptoethanol. The fact that no additional bands were observed confirms that there was no degradation of antibodies. These results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) comply with the study done by Ezzatifar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Before proceeding with conjugation, the antibodies were dialyzed against Carbonate buffer (10 mM, pH 9.5) at +4˚C overnight, as was done by Tijssen et al. in their experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref6">6</xref>] , in contrast to other studies which used fractionation of sera with sodium sulfate, followed by passage through a diethylaminoethyl cellulose column by Yoshitake et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Tijssen et al. and Boorsma et al. performed purification of HRP by chromatofocusing then ion exchange chromatography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref6">6</xref>] and by gel filtration on Sephadex G-25 and Ultrogel AcA-44 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref13">13</xref>] , respectively, before proceeding with the oxidation step. Whereas, in this research no purification was required because Peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich) Type VI-A, isolated from horseradish roots (Amoraciarusticana) essentially salt free, was used.</p><p>SDS-PAGE results of dialyzed IgG in reducing and non-reducing conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), verified that antibodies were not degraded. In non-reducing conditions only one band of high molecular weight (MW) appeared which refers to the IgG molecule and in reducing conditions two bands of MW 50 kDa and 25 kDa appeared, which correspond to heavy and light chains of antibodies, respectively.</p><p>Nakane and Kawaoi used FDNB to prevent self-coupling of activated HRP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref7">7</xref>] . In this study this step was skipped, since HRP has few lysine molecules, which is helpful in limiting unwanted self-coupling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref11">11</xref>] . Also, the periodate solution provides a slightly acidic medium which prevents the self-coupling of HRP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>According to the protocol of Eivazi et al., Sodium Periodate was added to the solution of HRP and kept at room temperature for 20 minutes in a dark place. To remove the excess of periodate after activation of HRP, micro-concentration was done instead of dialysis against Acetate buffer performed by Beyvazi et al., Eivazi et al. and Ezzatifar et al., or through Sephadex G-25 performed by Tijssen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Solution of antibodies dialyzed against Carbonate buffer was added to the activated HRP solution and the mixture was kept at room temperature for 2 hours. Sodium Borohydride was added to the HRP-IgG solution and incubated either for 90 minutes, or overnight, unlike Ramesh Kumar K et al. who stabilized conjugate for 10 min at room temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref16">16</xref>] . Finally, the conjugates were dialyzed against PBS at +4˚C overnight as per protocol of Nakane and Kawaoi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The titer of conjugates was determined by Indirect ELISA. The results showed that the optimum dilution of HRP-IgG conjugates prepared either by stabilization for 90 minutes or overnight with Sodium Borohydride was 1:5000 with an Optical Density of 0.9 and 0.996, respectively. Although the dilutions of the conjugates resembled the preparations by Eivazi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91794-ref15">15</xref>] , however, optimum titer obtained was different.</p><p>Indirect ELISA was also performed to test the one-month stability of the conjugates. HRP-IgG conjugates, stabilized for 90 minutes or overnight with Sodium Borohydride and stored at +4˚C showed Optical Density readings of 1.656, 1.525 and OD<sub>450</sub> 1.677, 1.629, respectively. Those readings were compared to the readings of the blank with OD<sub>450</sub> 0.091, 0.102 (where no primary antibodies were added) and the two positive controls with OD<sub>450</sub> 3.277, 3.057 (June 2017 conjugates) and OD<sub>450</sub> 1.944, 2.019 (October 2017 conjugate). All the above results confirm that both conjugates were stable.</p><p>Western Blot results of Erythropoietin, under reducing and non-reducing conditions, using conjugated secondary antibodies either stabilized for 90 minutes or overnight with Sodium Borohydride, showed that both conjugates were effective, since clear bands of Erythropoietin were visualized on the nitrocellulose membrane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Western Blot of Erythropoietin, under reducing and non-reducing conditions, was also performed to test the stability of the conjugates after 1 month, using conjugated secondary antibodies stabilized for 90 minutes or overnight with Sodium Borohydride and stored at +4˚C. The results showed that both conjugates were still effective since clear bands of Erythropoietin were visualized on the nitrocellulose membrane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Antibodies can be labeled with a variety of molecules. Enzymes are the most useful tags to label antibodies since obtained conjugates can be used to detect and quantify protein of interest using analytical techniques such as ELISA and Western Blot. Therefore, enzyme-labeled antibodies can be used in the pharmaceutical industry for the quality control of therapeutic proteins.</p><p>In-house conjugate of horseradish peroxidase with goat polyclonal antibodies was produced by a modified process of the previously described periodate oxidation method. Conjugate titration was performed in Indirect ELISA, where the optimum dilution for HRP-IgG conjugate was determined as 1:5000. Functionality of prepared conjugates was also tested by semi-dry Western Blot technique of the Erythropoietin, using TMB as substrate. The prepared conjugates were stored at +4˚C and were re-tested after one month in Indirect ELISA and Western Blot techniques. All results were satisfying.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pavliuchenko, N., Hazarnian, V. and Bassil, M. (2019) Modification of Periodate Oxidation Method to Produce HRP-IgG Conjugate and Test its Stability Overtime. American Journal of Molecular Biology, 9, 52-63. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajmb.2019.92005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.91794-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Making Antibody Labeling Easier. Guide to Antibody Labeling and Detection Methods. INNOVA.https://www.biomol.de/dateien/protocols/Innova/Innova--Antibody-Labeling-Guide.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antibody Labeling: Types of Labels. Advansta. https://advansta.com/wikis/antibody-labeling-types-labels</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, S., Batra, S. and Jain, M. (2014) Antibody Labeling with Radioiodine and Radiometals. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1141, 147-157.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0363-4_9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Behrens, C. and Liu, B. (2014) Methods for Site-Specific Drug Conjugation to Antibodies. MAbs, 6, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.4161/mabs.26632</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nigel, C.V. (2004) Horseradish Peroxidase: A Modern View of a Classic Enzyme. Phytochemistry, 65, 249-259.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tijssen, P. and Kurstak, E. (1984) Highly Efficient and Simple Methods for the Preparation of Peroxidase and Active Peroxidase-Antibody Conjugates for Enzyme Immunoassay. Analytical Biochemistry, 136, 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90243-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakane, P. and Kawaoi, A. (1974) Peroxidase-Labeled Antibody: A New Method of Conjugation. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 22, 1084-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/22.12.1084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avrameas, S., Ternynck, T. and Guesdon, J. (1978) Coupling of Enzymes to Antibodies and Antigens. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 8, 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.1978.tb03880.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ausubel, F.M., Brent, R., Kingston, R.E., Moore, D.D., Seidman, J.G., Smith, J.A. and Struhl, K. (2003) Immunology. In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Wiley, Hoboken, 1647.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bassil, M., Pavliuchenko, N. and Raya, E. (2018) Syringe Purification and HRP-Conjugation of Goat IgGs Used in Quality Control of Erythropoietin. Journal of Applied Biotechnology, 6, 11-18.https://doi.org/10.5296/jab.v6i2.12829</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezzatifar, F., Majidi, J., Baradaran, B., Maleki, L.A., Abdolalizadeh, J. and Yousefi, M. (2015) Large-Scale Generation and Characterization of Anti-Human IgA Monoclonal Antibody in Ascitic Fluid of Balb/c. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 5, 97-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoshitake, S., Imagawa, M., Ishikawa, E., Niitsu, Y., Urushizaki, I., Nishiura, M., Kanazawa, R., Kurosaki, H., Tachibana, S., Nakazawa, N. and Ogawa, H. (1982) Mild and Efficient Conjugation of Rabbit Fab’ and Horseradish Peroxidase Using Maleimide Compound and Its Use for Enzyme Immunoassay. Journal of Biochemistry, 92, 1413-1424. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a134065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boorsma, D.M. and Streefkerk, J.G. (1979) Periodate or Glutaraldehyde for Preparing Peroxidase Conjugates? Journal of Immunological Methods, 30, 245-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beyvazi, K., Hampton, S., Kwasowski, P., Fickling, S., Marks, V. and Clift, R. (1987) Comparison of Horseradish Peroxidase and Alkaline Phosphatase-Labelled Antibodies in Enzyme Immunoassays. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 24, 145-152.https://doi.org/10.1177/000456328702400204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eivazi, S., Majidi, J., Maleki, L., Abdolaizadeh, J., Yousfi, M., Ahmadi, M., Dadashi, S., Moradi, Z. and Zolali, E. (2015) Production and Purification of a Polyclonal Antibody against Purified Mouse IgG2b in Rabbits towards Designing Mouse Monoclonal Isotyping Kits. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 5, 109-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91794-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramesh Kumar, K., Xiavour, S., Latha, S., Kumar, V. and Sukumaran (2014) Anti-Human IgG-Horseradish Peroxidase Conjugate Preparation and Its Use in ELISA and Western Blotting Experiments. Journal of Chromatography and Separation Techniques, 5, 211.https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7064.1000211</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>