<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMN</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-0569</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmn.2019.92011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMN-91416</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Congenital Depressed Skull Fracture Lifting with Suction Cup: A Therapeutic Alternative to Surgery
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>André</surname><given-names>Tokpa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Louis</surname><given-names>Derou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Konan</surname><given-names>Serge Yao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oka</surname><given-names>Dominique N’dri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Neurosurgery, Teaching Hospital of Yopougon, Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Neurosurgery, Teaching Hospital of Bouaké, Bouaké, Cote d’Ivoire</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>115</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Congenital skull fractures of newborn are rare and create medico-legal problems. Their management is controversial. Between surgery considered too aggressive and uncertain conservative attitude, reduction by suction cup or breast pump is an alternative. The authors report their experience through a case of successful resolution of a congenital depressed skull fracture using a suction cup in a newborn at 13 day of life followed by a literature review. This technique avoids the usual complications of surgery and reduces the anxiety of parents related to surgery. It also avoids the anxiety of having a newborn with a recessed skull and a conservative attitude with uncertain outcome.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Congenital Skull Fracture</kwd><kwd> Depressed Skull Fracture</kwd><kwd> Suction Cup</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Depressed skull fracture in “Ping-Pong” is specific to newborn and infant because of the elasticity of the developing bone that allows an indentation without rupture.</p><p>It usually occurs after traumatic birth. However, they can occur during the antenatal period. The diagnosis is often made at birth and gives rise to serious problem of medical liability. In fact, it is impossible in case of obstetric maneuvers or associated instrumental extraction, to distinguish spontaneous depressed skull fractures from those induced by trauma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref1">1</xref>] , even if these last ones are significantly more likely associated to intracranial lesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The treatment of these depressed skull fractures is controversial. It differs according to the authors. Indeed, some authors propose a surgical abstention considering the possibility of spontaneous resolution; others on the other hand suggest a surgical management. Between these two modalities, there is lifting by suction maneuver, especially with a suction cup or a breast pump. We report our experience of congenital depressed skull fracture lifting with suction cup. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate the validity of a procedure that could be performed with a minim risk on patient by avoiding more aggressive surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Case Report</title><p>A male infant was born at 37 weeks of gestation by caesarean section due to presence of a placenta praevia. His mother was 30 years old and primiparous. Birth weight was 3600 g and head circumference at birth was 33 centimeters. The presentation was cephalic. The Apgar score was respectively 9, 9 and 10 in one, five and ten minutes. The pregnancy history was without any particularity. There was no mention of abdomino-pelvic trauma nor uterine myoma. A left parietal skull depression of 5 centimeters in diameter and 3 cm in depth was noted at birth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). There was no edema or subcutaneous hematoma with regard to depression. The anterior fontanel was normal. No sign of intracranial hypertension were detected.</p><p>The obstetrician requested a neurosurgery opinion. The CT-scan confirmed the depressed skull fracture without associated parenchymal lesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). We initially opted for conservative management and explained to the family the possibility of spontaneous resolution. However, one week after birth, parents consult again and express their anxiety. This led us to propose lifting the depressed skull fracture by using a suction cup at 13 days of life.</p><p>The suction cup was placed over the depressed region for obtaining the airtight seal between the scalp and the cup (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). A gradual aspiration was carried out until the depressed skull fracture is reduced. The maneuver was performed under general anesthesia.</p><p>In addition, there was a swelling at the site of application of the suction cup after the procedure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The newborn was discharge the day after.</p><p>The controls 3 months and one year later showed integral resolution and normal psychomotor development. There was no notion of epileptic seizure.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion</title><p>Congenital depression of the skull is relatively rare. Their incidence is estimated between 1 and 3 per 10,000 live births [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref3">3</xref>] . During the last ten years, 16 cases of congenital depression of the skull have been published (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This injury is a source of anxiety for parents. Congenital discomfort is the result of excessive and/or prolonged pressure on the skull during intra-uterine life or delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref4">4</xref>] . There are multiple causes, including maternal abdominopelvic trauma, forceps use, uterine fibroids, vicious fetal presentations, fetal skull compression by the</p><p>limbs, the head of a twin, or maternal bone structures such as L5 vertebra, promontory, pubic symphysis and ischium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref6">6</xref>] . These discomforts are not favored by maternal age, parity, gestational age, type of delivery, and fetal weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The consequences of these skull depressions seem to be mainly aesthetic. On the 16 cases collected in the literature these last 10 years, no case of sensitivo-motor deficit or psychomotor disorder was reported. It was believed for a long time that patients with congenital skull depression had an increased risk of seizures. In addition, some authors have expressed the concern that the pressure exerted by depression on the brain parenchyma may cause functional brain damage, a decrease in cerebral blood flow, and epileptogenic foci thus explaining the value of surgical treatment.</p><p>However, several studies since the 1960s have shown that for children without neurological sequelae or radiographic evidence of intracranial injury, there was no difference between surgically and non-surgically treated patients in terms of future neurological damage or epileptics seizures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>From then on, the surgical lifting which was for long time the rule is increasingly questioned, reinforced by the numerous cases of spontaneous reduction reported.</p><p>Spontaneous resolution can occur because the newborn and the infant skull are thin and flexible thus it can be remodeled [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Among the 16 cases published these past 10 years, 9 were treated surgically and 7 were conservatively. This shows that surgery still have an important place in the management of this lesion. This surgery is also a source of anxiety for parents just like having a newborn with down skull. The outcome of the conservative attitude is uncertain with a period of spontaneous resolution up to 6 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref10">10</xref>] . On the other hand, there is little information to help clinicians to accurately predict which depressed skull fracture will reduce spontaneously. Usually, larger and deeper depressions are dealt more aggressively. However, the treatment remains uncodified.</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Reports in literature</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gestational age at birth</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal associated pathology with pregnancy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of delivery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skull depression dimension</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Neurological manifestation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Follow-up outcome</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fantacci C and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref5">5</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >elective cesarean section at the request of the parturient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery at 3rd day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >immediate full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gezmu AM and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref6">6</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for seat presentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 3 cm depth: 2.5 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery at 8th day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >immediate full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agrawal S K and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 4 cm depth: 1 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution in 6 months</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huang Y and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref3">3</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for (occipitotransvers position)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 5 cm depth: 2 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution in 4 months</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tovar-Spinoza ZS and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HIV Infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery at 13th day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >immediate partial resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dharmaraj S T and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for failure of work progression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 6 cm depth: 2 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery at 2 week of life</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suneja U and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref15">15</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for fetal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 4.5 cm depth: 0.5 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Arifin MZ and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >occurrence of epileptic seizure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full reduction</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >born at term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 2 cm depth: 2 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aliabadi H and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref7">7</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for failure of work progression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Basaldella L and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref17">17</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for failure of work progression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution in 8 month</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for failure of work progression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution in 8 month</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Staels W and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref18">18</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery assisted by suction cup</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 4 cm depth: 0.5 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery due to an associated cerebral contusion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preston D and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref19">19</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >28 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >38 weeks + 4 days</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >high blood pressure and pre-eclampsia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >caesarean section for fetal distress</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >diameter: 3 cm depth: 3 cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >none</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >conservative</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution in 6 month</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Veeravagu A.<sup> </sup>and col. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 weeks + 5 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginal delivery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >unspecify</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >none</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >full resolution</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Between surgical treatment considered too aggressive for a newborn child with a potentially self-limiting lesion and uncertain conservative treatment, vacuum reduction with a suction cup or breast pump is an alternative. This last therapeutic treatment which can be done without general anesthesia, is less aggressive and allows an immediate resolution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref12">12</xref>] . It helps avoid thereby the most common complications of surgery, including infection, bruising and blood loss. The breast pump seems more advantageous than the suction cup. Indeed the transparency of the breast pump allows observing in real time the lifting of the depression. Moreover it seems less aggressive than metal suction cup. In addition, it seems less aggressive than the metal suction cup. Therefore it avoids the temporary marks left on the scalp by the vacuum metal like in our case [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.91416-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Skull Congenital depression, although rare and usually benign, still raises problems of therapeutic management because it is not yet codified. Between conventional surgical treatment, considering too aggressive and conservative attitude long and uncertain, we suggest the technique of reduction by suction cup or breast pump which is a less aggressive and effective alternative.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tokpa, A., Derou, L., Yao, K.S. and N’dri, O.D. (2019) Congenital Depressed Skull Fracture Lifting with Suction Cup: A Therapeutic Alternative to Surgery. Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery, 9, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmn.2019.92011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.91416-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chauvet, A., Boukerrou, M., Nayama, M., Dufour, P. and Puech, F. (2005) Traumatismes craniens obstétricaux spontanés: Mythe ou réalité [Spontaneous Intrauterine Depression Skull: Myth or Reality]? Gynécologie Obstétrique &amp; Fertilité, 33, 582-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.06.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dupuis, O., Silveira, R., Dupont, C., et al. (2005) Comparison of “Instrument-Associated” and “Spontaneous” Obstetric Depressed Skull Fractures in a Cohort of 68 Neonates. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 192, 165-170.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Y.J., Zhuang, J.W., Chen, Y.Z. and Li, W.Z. (2016) Congenital Skull Depression in a Newborn. Delivered by Cesarean Section due to Continued Occipitotransverse Position: Case Report and Short Communication. International Journal of Neurology and Neurotherapy, 3, Article ID: 054.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ben-Ari, Y., Merlob, P., Hirsch, M. and Reisner, SH. (1986) Congenital Depression of the Neonatal Skull. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 22, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(86)90073-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fantacci, C., Massimi, L., Capozzi, D., Romano, V., Ferrara, P. and Chiaretti, A. (2015) “Spontaneous” Ping-Pong Fracture in Newborns: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Signa Vitae, 10, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.22514/SV101.042015.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gezmu, A.M. and Mazhani, L. (2017) A Case Report of Significant Congenital Depressed Skull Fracture after Cesarean Section Delivery. African Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 16, 123-125. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajmhs.ajmhs_28_17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aliabadi, H., Miller, J., Radnakrishnan, S., Mehta, A.I., Thomas, K., Selznick, L., Goldberg, R., Grant, G. and Fuchs, H. (2009) Spontaneous Intrauterine “Ping-Pong” Fracture: Review and Case Illustration. Neuropediatrics, 40, 73-75.  
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1234108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steinbok, P., Flodmark, O., Martens, D. and Germann, E.T. (1987) Management of Simple Depressed Skull Fractures in Children. Journal of Neurosurgery, 66, 506-510. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1987.66.4.0506</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agrawal, S.K., Kumar, P. and Sundaram, V. (2010) Congenital Depression of the Skull in Neonate: A Case of Successful Conservative Management. Journal of Child Neurology, 25, 387-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809338520</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanlon, L., Hogan, B., Corcoran, D. and Ryan, S. (2006) Congenital Depression of the Neonatal Skull: A Self Limiting Condition. BMJ Journals, 91, F272.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.082347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mastrapa, T.L., Fernandez, L.A., Alvarez, M.D., Storrs, B.B. and Flores-Urueta, A. (2007) Depressed Skull Fracture in Ping Pong: Elevation with Medeva Extractor. Child’s Nervous System, 23, 787-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0354-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saunders, B.S., Lazoritz, S., McArtor, R.D., Marshall, P. and Bason, W.M. (1979) Depressed Skull Fracture in the Neonate. Report of 3 Cases. Journal of Neurosurgery, 50, 512-514. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1979.50.4.0512</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tovar-Spinoza, Z.S. and Kim, P.D. (2012) Congenital Depressed Skull Fracture in the Absence of Trauma: Case Report and Literature Review. Research and Reports in Neonatology, 2, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRN.S29666</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dharmaraj, S.T., Embleton, N.D., Jenkins, A. and Jones, G. (2009) Depressed Skull Fracture in a Newborn Baby. BMJ Journals, 94, F137.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.148718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suneja, U., Prokhorov, S. and Rajegowda, B. (2015) Depressed Skull Fracture in a Term Newborn Infant. Pediatrics and Therapeutics, 5, i109.  
https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0665.1000i109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arifin, M.Z., Gill, A.S., Anwar, A.D., Djuwantono, T. and Faried, A. (2013) Spontaneous Depressed Skull Fracture during Vaginal Delivery: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review. Indian Journal of Neurotrauma, 10, 33-37.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnt.2012.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Basaldella, L., Marton, E., Bekelis, K. and Longatti, P. (2011) Spontaneous Resolution of Atraumatic Intrauterine Ping-Pong Fractures in Newborns Delivered by Cesarean Section. Journal of Child Neurology, 26, 1449-1451.  
https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073811410058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Staels, W., Lefevere, J., Decaluwe, W., Vantomme, N. and Philippe, G. (2012) Pingpong Skull Fracture in the Newborn: To Treat or Not to Treat? Journal du Pédiatre Belge, 14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Preston, D., Jackson, S. and Gandhi, S. (2015) Non-Traumatic Depressed Skull Fracture in a Neonate or “Ping Pong” Fracture. BMJ Case Reports, 2015, bcr2014207077. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2014-207077</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.91416-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veeravagu, A., Azad, T.D., Jiang, B. and Edwards, M.S.B. (2018) Spontaneous Intrauterine Depressed Skull Fracture: Report of 2 Cases Requiring Neurosurgical Intervention and Literature Review. World Neurosurgery, 110, 256-262.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.029</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>