<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJRad</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Radiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-3024</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojrad.2019.91006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJRad-90836</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Ultrasound Study of First Trimester Bleeding
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mathurin</surname><given-names>Neossi Guena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Florent</surname><given-names>Zilbinkai Alapha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Doris</surname><given-names>Christelle Maleu Kemegne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Achille</surname><given-names>Nkigoum Nana</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Odile</surname><given-names>Fernande Zeh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>Gonsu Fotsing</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Yaounde Gynaecology Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital, Yaounde, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Gyneacology and Obstetrical Service, Ngaoundéré Regional Hospital, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Imaging Service, Ngaoundéré Regional Hospital, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ngaoundéré, Ngaoundéré, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>01</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: Bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy is common and can be a sign of complication that often necessitates obstetric ultrasound for the assessment of the haemorrhage, and of fetal well being. The aim of this study was to determine the causes of first trimester bleeding on obstetrical ultrasound in our area. 
  Method: It was a cross-sectional descriptive study during a six-month period from May to October 2017. All women who referred to the Regional center of medical imaging of Ngaoundere who agreed to participate in the study with first trimester bleeding were evaluated with clinical history and ultrasonography (US). Ultrasonographic exam was done via transabdominal or endovaginal approaches using GE LOGIQ 7 scanner brand. Microsoft Office Excel 2010 and SPHINX V 4.0 were used for data analysis. 
  Results: A total of 121 of pregnant women who presented vaginal bleeding during the first trimester were enrolled into the study. These Ultrasound examinations represented 37.93% of all obstetric ultrasounds in the first trimester. The patients in this study ranged in age from 16 to 47 years with an average of 30 years. 50 (41.32%) were pregnant for the first time and 24 (19.83%) were primiparous. Mean gestational age was 9 weeks with the extremes of 5 and 12 weeks. 97 (80.2%) reported spontaneous bleeding while in 24 (18.8%) bleeding was mostly caused by sexual intercourse 11 (45.8%). Pelvic pain 91 (75.2%) was the most associated sign. 36 (29.8%) patients were diagnosed as threatened abortions. 27 (22.3%) were diagnosed with incomplete abortions. 4 (3.3%) cases showed an ectopic gestation. 9 (7.4%) cases showed complete abortions. Concordance between clinical diagnosis and ultrasound results was 84%. 
  Conclusions: Bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy is common in our area. Ultrasonography occupies a prominent place in the etiological diagnosis of bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy; it is easy to find in most cases a responsible abnormality of bleeding.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bleeding of the First Trimester</kwd><kwd> Pregnancy</kwd><kwd> Ultrasound</kwd><kwd> Etiological Diagnosis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>First trimester bleeding is common in the emergencies and occurs to pregnant women who are 12 weeks or less of amenorrhea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref1">1</xref>] . Spotting is the most common cause of bleeding caused by implantation of the conceptus into the endometrium. The occurrence of first trimester bleeding per vaginum is estimated to be as high as 7% to 24% in early pregnancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref2">2</xref>] . About 50% of first Trimester bleeding lead to miscarriage; the primary causes of first trimester bleeding are spontaneous abortions, ectopic pregnancies, and gestational trophoblastic diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] . The diagnosis is usually clinical, based on physical examination and clinical history and is confirmed by ultrasound. Since its introduction, technology has increased. Endovaginal ultrasonography represented a significant enhancement of this technology decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality. Now it is possible to detect an intrauterine gestational sac as early as five weeks. Clinical history and pelvic examination are often inadequate in assessing the cause and the prognosis. When ultrasonography reveals the nature of the pregnancy (viable/non-viable), unnecessary complications and misdiagnosis in first trimester bleeding can be avoided [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref2">2</xref>] . But the unavailability of ultrasound devices and trained practitioners limit the use of this exam. Therefore this study was undertaken for assessment of bleeding in the first trimester of pregnancy at the Regional Hospital of Ngaoundere to identify the main causes whose knowledge can improve their management even in the absence of ultrasound.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>We carried out a descriptive cross-sectional study. It took place at the Regional Center for Medical Imaging of Ngaoundere Regional Hospital from May to October 2017. This study included all patients up to 12 weeks of gestational age who agreed to participate in the study with first trimester bleeding referred to the center for ultrasonography examination. All patients with non-obstetrical causes of vaginal bleeding and whose records were not complete were excluded. Sampling was consecutive and exhaustive non probabilistic. Data was collected from the radiologist report and request forms of patients. All the patients were scanned using GE LOGIQ 7 Ultrasound. These studies was done using either a 3.5 MHz probe trans abdominal. Transvaginal ultrasonography was performed when the patient’s bladder was empty and when the gestational week was 7 weeks or less, using 4.2 - 6.5 MHz endocavitory probe. The variables studied were age, profession, gravidity, parity, heaviness of bleeding, ultrasound results and concordance rate between clinical diagnosis and ultrasound diagnosis. To determine the amount of bleeding, it is based on the condition of the sanitary napkins during the duration of bleeding, if we observe that a point on the towel, we speak of spotting, if the towel partially soaked, the bleeding is light, if the towel is completely soaked with debortment and blood clots one speaks of heavy bleeding. The concordance rate was calculated as the ratio of the number of ultrasound diagnosis to the number of clinical diagnosis multiplied by one hundred. During ultrasound examination, the following findings was noted like uterine size, presence and location of the gestational sac, crown rump length (CRL), cardiac activity, foetal movements, presence or absence of foetal pole an finally a study of adnexa and presence of any free fluid in the cul-de-sac. All the data collected were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and Sphinx version 4.0 to produce frequency tables and charts. There was cross tabulations to explore relationship between variables. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical Committee of Ngaoundere Regional Hospital</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>One hundred and twenty one (121) women aged between 16 and 47 years old with an average of 30 years were enrolled in this study. The modal age group was 30 to 34 years old representing 31.4% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), Most were housewives 54 (44.6%) and students 22 (18.1%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). 50 (41.32%) were pregnant for the first time and 24 (19.83%) were primiparous. Mean gestational age was 9 weeks with the extremes of 5 and 12 weeks, the 6 to 10 weeks period were predominant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). 97 (80.2%) reported spontaneous bleeding while in 24 (18.8%) bleeding was caused, mostly by sexual intercourses 11 (45.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The 36 (29.8%) patients were diagnosed as threatened abortions. 27 (22.3%) was diagnosed with incomplete abortions. 4 (3.3%) cases showed an ectopic gestation. 9 (7.4%) cases showed complete abortions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>There was a statistically significant relation (p = 0.001) between ultrasonography findings and the heaviness of bleeding (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). There was a statistically significant relation (p = 0.002) between Ultrasonography results and the presence of blood clots and retained product of conception (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). We notice that</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by age group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age group</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤25 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 - 29 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 34 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 - 39 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 44 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥45 y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by profession</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Housewife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dressmaker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teacher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tradeswoman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secretary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Other = cashier, hairdresser, accountant, journalist, veterinary.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patient by gestational age, gravidity and parity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestational age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- ≤6 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 6 to 10 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- 10 to 12 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Primigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Primipara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Multipara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patient by the causes and heaviness of bleeding</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Spontaneous</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Caused</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heaviness of bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Spotting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Heavy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Circumstances of occurrence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Sexual intercourse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Physical effort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >- Other*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Other = road accident, personal hygiene.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Ultrasonography examination findings</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >USG Diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gupta N et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref2">2</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aronu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Priso B et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Present study</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threatened abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 (36%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 (65.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 (27.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (29.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (20%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (6.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (9.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (22.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stopped pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 (20.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (18.2%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (5.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (15.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (12%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (8.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (4.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (7.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ectopic gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (3.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anembryonic gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (12.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (2.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molar pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (2.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (0.8%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of ultrasonography examination by the heaviness of bleeding</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bleeding</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >USG findings</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heavy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spotting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threatened abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stopped pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ectopic gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anembryonic Gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molar pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of ultrasonography results by the presence of blood clots and retained product of conception</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Blood clots</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Retained products of conception</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >USC results</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threatened abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stopped pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ectopic gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anembryonic Gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molar pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>patients with incomplete abortions had blood clots during bleeding. Therefore there is no statistically significant relation between ultrasound results and the existence of retained products of conception (P = 0.056). The confrontation between the clinical diagnosis and the ultrasound results showed a concordance rate of 84% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>A total of 121 of pregnant women who presented vaginal bleeding during the first trimester referred to the center for an ultrasonography examination were enrolled into the study. These ultrasound examinations represented 37.93% of all obstetric ultrasounds in the first trimester, so this is a common pattern of ultrasound. The 121 women in this study ranged in age from 16 to 47 years with an average of 30 years. The target for these disturbances is logically made up of women of childbearing age. Patients aged between 30 and 34 years (31.4%) were more represented. This rate is in accordance with findings reported in similar studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] . Most of them were housewives with a rate of 44.6% comparable to those of Albachar and Diarisso who had found a rate of 49.4% and 69.1% respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref6">6</xref>] . This higher rate of housewives confirms that in our socio-professional structure housewives are the most numerous. Most of them were multigravidas (80.2%) and pimiparous (56.2%). The risk of bleeding increased with a large number of gesture due to dynamic changes of the uterus and cervix which become weak [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref5">5</xref>] . This bleeding occurs at all gestational ages between the implantation of the embryo in the uterus and 12 SA, mostly between 6 - 10 weeks in 75.2% in our serie and 50.8% in that of Boco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref7">7</xref>] . This period which follows the implantation of the conceptus into the endometrium remains fragile.</p><p>In our study, 97 (80.2%) women reported spontaneous bleeding while 24 (18.8%) bleeding were caused, mostly by sexual intercoursies 11 (45.8%). Indeed this period of pregnancy is delicate and the bleeding can occur even if the trauma is minimal.</p><p>The heaviness of bleeding occurring during first trimester pregnancies varies according to the etiology (p = 0.001). Patients with incomplete abortions had such heavy bleeding as those with complete abortions. It is important to estimate the heaviness of bleeding and to look for associated signs in order to assess the</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Confrontation between clinical and USG based diagnosis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Category</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clinical diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >USG diagnosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Normal USG</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threatened abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Incomplete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stopped pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Complete abortions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ectopic gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anembryonic Gestation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molar pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 (84%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (16%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>patient’s hemodynamic status and evoking the etiology. The most common associated sign in our series is pain as and in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>As ultrasonography findings, threatened abortion (29.8%) was the commonest cause of first trimester vaginal bleeding. This similar trend was observed in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref8">8</xref>] . Threatened abortion is the result of marginal abruption with separation of the chorion from the endometrial lining and subchorionic hemorrhage which can lead to an abortion. On ultrasonography, subchorionic hemorrhage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) is either hypoechoic or echoic depending on the age of the blood products at the time of the US examination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>27 (22.3%) women were diagnosed with incomplete abortions. This rate is comparable to that of Yang and al, who found a rate of 23.1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref9">9</xref>] . Persistent vaginal bleeding after an abortion may be due to retained trophoblastic tissue, but these women may also present with symptoms of infection, including pain and fever [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref10">10</xref>] . Findings on US are heterogeneous hypoechoic material in the endometrial cavity consistent of retained trophoblastic tissue and blood clots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>There were 22 (18%) cases of stopped pregnancies (fetal demise). Belley Priso and al found a rate of 20%. As US features, there was an ovular gestational sac containing an embryo with no cardiac activity detected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] . This may occur during the early stages of pregnancies usually under 10 weeks gestational age.</p><p>Bleeding from an ectopic pregnancy is the most dangerous cause of first trimester bleeding. It concerned 3.3% of the cases in our study. Belley and al found a rate of 5.2%. It occurs when the fertilized egg is implanted outside of the uterus, most often in the Fallopian tube. The ultrasonographic finding was the visualization of an annular adnexal mass containing a viable embryo or not (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), sometimes with a hemoperitoneum with an empty uterus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] . The incidence is higher in patients with a history of prior ectopic pregnancy, previous pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal disease, presence of an intrauterine device, and in those undergoing in vitro fertilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>9 (7.4%) were diagnosed as complete abortion. This rate is similar to those of Coulibaly who found a rate of 9.1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref1">1</xref>] . The causes of this are various, the presence of myomas, the genetic abnormalities, the infectious diseases such as malaria. The uterus appears to be empty based on ultrasound evaluation.</p><p>An anembryonic pregnancy (blighted ovum) is an early failure of the embryo to develop within the GS. 3 (2.5%) patients were diagnosed with blighted ovum. Diarisso in 2011 found a rate of 4.3% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref6">6</xref>] . The ultrasonographic finding was the visualization of a gestational sac within the uterus with an irregular contour without embryos which can contain a Yolk sac (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>Molar pregnancy is the most common gestational trophoblastic disease. It results from the fecundation of a single egg with no active nucleus, which means all the chromosomes present in the hydatidiform mole are paternal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref12">12</xref>] . It was diagnosed in one patient (0.8%) which is less than those found in similar studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref7">7</xref>] . Ultrasound examination showed a heterogeneous echogenic endometrial mass with multiple variable-sized cysts (‘‘Swiss cheese’’ or ‘‘snowstorm’’ endometrium) and no visible embryo (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Correct management of cases depends on correct diagnosis. In our study</p><p>concordance between clinical diagnosis and ultrasonographic diagnosis was 84%. 3 (2.5%) cases of anembryonic gestation and 1 (0.8%) case of molar pregnancy were diagnosed based on USG, none of them were diagnosed clinically. This concordance rate in our study is relatively high, but low compared to most studies where the concordance rate varies from 96% to 100% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] , this is certainly due to the disparity in the level of precrisptors which varies from nurse to obstetric gynecologist through midwives. Aronu and al found that the highest concordance between clinical diagnosis and ultrasonographic diagnosis was observed in Obstetrics and Gynecology specialist group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref3">3</xref>] . There was a statistically significant relation (p = 0.001) between ultrasonography findings and the heaviness of bleeding. Patients with incomplete abortions had heavy bleeding than those with complete abortions. While those with stopped pregnancies had a light bleeding even when it’s well known that among intrauterine pregnancies, light bleeding or spotting of short duration does not increase the risk of miscarriage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref13">13</xref>] . There was a statistically significant relation (p = 0.002) between Ultrasonography results and the presence of blood clots and retained product of conception. We noticed that patients with incomplete abortions had blood clots during bleeding. Therefore there is no statistically significant relation between ultrasound results and the existence of retained products of conception (P = 0.056). In normal viable intra uterine pregnancy bleeding was spontaneous or induced coming from the closed cervix. Heavy bleeding occurred mainly in incomplete and complete abortions, while spotting and light bleeding occurred in threatened abortions, viable intra uterine pregnancy and stopped pregnancies. Pelvic pain 91 (75.2%) was the most reported associated sign. In threatened abortions, stopped pregnancies, incomplete and complete abortions, the bleeding was spontaneous which comes from the uterus. Threatened abortions, incomplete abortion, stopped pregnancy, molar pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy were characterized by metrorrhagia, pelvic pain, adnexal mass, an open or not cervix and were confirmed only on ultrasound, which was the only way to diagnose ectopic pregnancy, anembryonic pregnancy, and molar pregnancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90836-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limit of the Study</title><p>Nonspecific sonographic findings in a patient with first trimester bleeding should be correlated with serum beta hCG levels to arrive at an appropriate clinical diagnosis, what is not the case in our study and what makes the diagnosis often difficult. Limitations of this study also include the difficulty to assess the outcome of pregnancies, most of the patients did not come back to attend their prenatal follow-up.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Bleeding in the first trimester pregnancies is a very common obstetrical problem, indeed is a frequent cause for assessing ultrasound scans at the regional hospital of Ngaoundere. It is a source of anxiety both to the patients and the obstetrician. This study shows that it is the common problem in 26 - 34 age pregnant women. The most common causes of first trimester bleeding are threatened abortions, incomplete abortions, stopped pregnancies, complete abortions, ectopic gestation, anembryonic gestation and molar pregnancy. 15.7% of pregnancies with first trimester bleeding are normal. Our study has shown the low concordance between clinical diagnosis and ultrasonographic diagnosis compared to other studies. This highlights the need for availability of ultrasound devices and trained sonographers to guide the clinician for better management of cases.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Neossi Guena, M., Zilbinkai Alapha, F., Maleu Kemegne, D.C., Nkigoum Nana, A., Zeh, O.F. and Gonsu Fotsing, J. (2019) Ultrasound Study of First Trimester Bleeding. Open Journal of Radiology, 9, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojrad.2019.91006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.90836-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulibaly, N. (2010) Study of the First Trimester of Bleeding in the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the Reference Health Center of Commune V of BAMAKO District. End of Study Medicine Thesis, University of Bamako, Mali.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, N., Samariya, M., Choudhary, D., Yadav, K. and Kannoujiya, P. (2016) Ultrasonographic Evaluation of First Trimester Bleeding per Vaginum. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 3085-3087. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162990</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aronu, M.E., et al. (2018) A Review of the Correlation between Clinical Diagnosis and Ultrasound Diagnosis in First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding. Annals of Medical and Health Science Research, 8, 120-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Belley Priso, E., Moifo, B., Zeh, O.F., Nana Njamen, T., Foumane, P., Nguemgne, C., Ayuk, P.A. and Mboudou, E. (2010) Contribution of Emergency Ultrasonography in the Management of Bleeding during the First Trimester of Pregnancy at the Douala General Hospital. African Journal of Medical Imaging, 3, 187-196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albachar, H (2006) Les hémorragies du premier trimestre de la grossesse au centre de sante de référence de la commune VI. Thèse Med, Bamako, No. 203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diarisso, A. (2012) First Trimester Hemorrhages at Nianankorofomba de Segou hospital. End of Study Medicine Thesis, University of Bamako, Mali, 90 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boco, V., Akpovi, J., Takpara, I., Latoundji, M.C., Lantokpode, J.C. and Perrin, R. (1997) Interest of Ultrasound in Metrorrhagia of the First Trimester Pregnancy. Medicine d’Afrique Noire, 44, 97-100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kane, B. (2011) Study of Bleeding in the First Trimester of Pregnancy at the Bougouni Reference Health Center. End of Study Medicine Thesis, University of Bamako, Mali, 117 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, J., Hartmann, K., Savitz, D., Herring, A., Dole, N., Olshan, A., et al. (2004) Vaginal Bleeding During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160, 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh180</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vidya, A., Guruvaj, D., Uma, A. and Rum, N. (2016) Ultrasonographic Evaluation of First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences, 9, 107-111.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dighe, M., Cuevas, C., Moshiri, M., Dubinsky, T. and Dogra. V.S. (2008) Sonography in First Trimester Bleeding. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 36, 352-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levine, D. (2007) Ectopic Pregnancy. Radiology, 245, 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2452061031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasan, R., Baird, D.D., Herring, A.H., Olshan, A.F., Jonsson Funk, M.L. and Hartmann, K.E. (2009) Association between First-Trimester Vaginal Bleeding and Miscarriage. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 114, 860-867. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b79796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90836-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Singh</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Assessment of First Trimester Vaginal Bleeding Using Ultrasound Sonography</article-title><source> Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 54</fpage>-<lpage>56</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>