<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4717</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijaa.2019.91002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJAA-90161</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Early Solar System Solar Wind Implantation of 7Be into Calcium-Alumimum Rich Inclusions in Primitive Meteortites
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Glynn</surname><given-names>E. Bricker</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Physics, Purdue University Northwest, Westville, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>12</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The one time presence of short-lived radionuclides (SLRs) in Calcium-Aluminum Rich inclusions (CAIs) in primitive meteorites has been detected. The solar wind implantation model (SWIM) is one possible model that attempts to explain the catalogue of SLRs found in primitive meteorites. In the SWIM, solar energetic particle (SEP) nuclear interactions with gas in the proto-solar atmosphere of young stellar objects (YSOs) give rise to daughter nuclei, including SLRs. These daughter nuclei then may become entrained in the solar wind via magnetic field lines. Subsequently, the nuclei, including SLRs, may be implanted into CAI precursors that have fallen from the main accretion flow which had been destined for the proto-star. This mode of implanting SLRs in the solar system is viable, and is exemplified by the impregnation of the lunar surface with solar wind particles, including SLRs. X-ray luminosities have been measured to be 100,000 times more energetic in YSOs, including T-Tauri stars, than present-day solar luminosities. The SWIM scales the production rate of SLRs to nascent SEP activity in T-Tauri stars. Here, we model the implantation of 
  <sup>7</sup>Be into CAIs in the SWIM, utilizing the enhanced SEP fluxes and the rate of refractory mass inflowing at the X-region, 0.06 AU from the proto-Sun. Taking into account the radioactive decay of 
  <sup>7</sup>Be and spectral flare variations, the 
  <sup>7</sup>Be/
  <sup>9</sup>Be initial isotopic ratio is found to range from 1 &#215; 10
  <sup>&amp;minus;5</sup> to 5 &#215; 10
  <sup>&amp;minus;5</sup>.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Radio-Nuclide</kwd><kwd> 7Be</kwd><kwd> Early Solar System</kwd><kwd> Solar Wind</kwd><kwd> CAI</kwd><kwd> Solar Wind  Implantation Model</kwd><kwd> X-Wind</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Studies report evidence for the one-time presence of SLRs, through decay product systematics, including <sup>10</sup>Be, <sup>26</sup>Al, <sup>36</sup>Cl, <sup>41</sup>Ca, and <sup>53</sup>Mn, in CAIs in primitive carbonaceous meteorites at the nascence of the solar system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref1">1</xref>] . The possible origins of these SLRs are widely varied and include stellar sources (AGB Stars, Wolf-Rayet stars, nova, and super nova) and energetic particle interaction, from either SEPs, or galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). Bricker &amp; Caffee [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref3">3</xref>] proposed the solar wind implantation model (SWIM) for the incorporation of <sup>10</sup>Be and <sup>36</sup>Cl into CAIs early in primitive meteorites.</p><p>In the SWIM, the SLRs come into existence via SEP nuclear reactions in the proto-solar atmosphere of the young Sun, characterized by X-ray emissions orders of magnitude greater than main sequence stars. Studies of the Orion Nebulae indicate that pre-main sequence (PMS) stars exhibit X-ray luminosity, and hence SEP fluxes on the order of ~10<sup>5</sup> over contemporary SEP flux levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref4">4</xref>] . The irradiation produced SLRs are then trapped by magnetic field lines, and these solar wind SLRs eventually impregnate CAI precursors. This mode of production of SLRs, entrainment of SLRs in the solar wind, and implantation of SLR into solar system material is seen in the implantation of solar wind particles, e.g. <sup>10</sup>Be [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref6">6</xref>] and <sup>14</sup>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref7">7</xref>] , on the Moon.</p><p><sup>10</sup>Be is produced via SEP spallation reactions, with oxygen serving as the chief target particle in the SWIM. Similar to <sup>10</sup>Be, <sup>7</sup>Be, half-life of 53 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref8">8</xref>] , is also primarily produced through SEP nuclear reactions with oxygen as the primary target particle, and <sup>7</sup>Be has also recently been detected in stellar photospheres [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref9">9</xref>] In addition, the one-time presence of <sup>7</sup>Be has been measured in CAIs in primitive meteorites (through the study of Li, the decay product of <sup>7</sup>Be, systematics) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref11">11</xref>] . Owing to the 53 day half-life, local irradiation is the only possible operation pathway for <sup>7</sup>Be production. As such, the large difference in half-lives between <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>10</sup>Be is of interest in terms of chronological processes associated with early solar system and CAI formation and evolution.</p><p>In this work, we consider the possible incorporation of <sup>7</sup>Be into CAIs in primitive carbonaceous meteorites in the SWIM. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> below characterizes berylliumisotopes found in CAIs.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Solar Wind Implantation Mode</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Synopsis</title><p>In the SWIM, SLRs are produced in the solar nebula via SEP nuclear reactions on gaseous target material in the solar atmosphere ~4.6 Gyr, during the formation</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Beryllium isotopes found in CAIs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nuclide</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Half-life</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial Isotopic Ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Radionuclide (g<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>7</sup>Be</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref10">10</xref>] 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#215; 10<sup>13 </sup> 5.3 &#215; 10<sup>13 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>10</sup>Be</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> yr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4 &#215; 10<sup>12 </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Radionuclide content in g<sup>−1</sup> calculated from initial isotopic ratio and <sup>9</sup>Be content in ppb. The <sup>9</sup>Be content in CAIs is estimated 100 ppb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>of the solar system. These newly produced nuclei are incorporated in the solar wind. The SLRs flow along magnetic field lines in the solar wind, and this particle flow intersects with materials which have fallen out of the main accretion flow, which was headed to hot-spots on the Sun. At the intersection of outflowing SLRs, and inflowing fallen CAI precursor material, the SLRs may become impregnated into the inflowing materials. The fundamental geometry for the implantation process described above and transportation of implanted CAIs to the asteroid zone can be gleaned from the X-wind model of Shu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref18">18</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> below illustrates of the basic magnetic field geometry, <sup>7</sup>Be production via SEP flaring activity, and subsequent implantation into CAI-precursor material from the main funnel flow onto the proto-Sun.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Refractory Mass Inflow Rate</title><p>The effective refractory mass inflow rate, S, i.e. the refractory mass that falls from the main funnel flow which was accreting onto the star at the X-region, is calculated from equation (1):</p><p>S = M ˙ D ⋅ X r ⋅ F (1)</p><p>where M ˙ D is disk mass accretion rate, X<sub>r</sub> is the cosmic mass fraction, and F is the fraction of material that enters the X-region from the main funnel flow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref19">19</xref>] . For M ˙ D , we adopt 1 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup>. Disk mass accretion rates range from ~10<sup>−7</sup> to ~10<sup>−10</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup> for T Tauri stars from 1 - 3 Myr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref20">20</xref>] , whereas embedded class 0 and class I PMS stars have mass accretion rates of ~10<sup>−5</sup> to ~10<sup>−6</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref21">21</xref>] . Here we adopt for M ˙ D , a rate 1 &#215; 10<sup>−7</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup>, corresponding to class II or III PMS stars. From Lee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref19">19</xref>] we utilize a cosmic mass fraction, X<sub>r</sub><sub>,</sub> and fraction of refractory material fraction F, of 4 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> and 0.01, respectively, in our model. X<sub>r</sub> represents the fraction of refractory content in the inflowing material, and F represents the fraction of inflowing mass that does not accrete onto the proto-sun. The choice 0.01</p><p>maximizes F, and corresponds to all the mass which comprises the planets falling from the accretion flow. F = 0.01 is the preferred value of Lee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref19">19</xref>] in their model. (See Lee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref19">19</xref>] for a detailed discussion of X<sub>r</sub> and F) Employing Equation (1) and the parameters detailed above, we find the rate at which this refractory material reaches the x-region, called here the refractory mass inflow rate, S, is 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup> g s<sup>−1</sup>. In consideration of the extreme values of, S, S could be two orders of magnitude greater if the accretion rates of ~10<sup>−5</sup> to ~10<sup>−6</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup>, or S could also be four orders of magnitude less if the mass accretion rate was ~10<sup>−8</sup> to 10<sup>−10</sup> solar masses year<sup>−1</sup> and F ~0.0001.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Effective Ancient Production Rate</title><p>The effective ancient <sup>7</sup>Be outflow rate, P in units of s<sup>−1</sup>, is given by:</p><p>P = p ⋅ f (2)</p><p>where p is the ancient production rate and f is the fraction of the solar wind <sup>7</sup>Be that enters the CAI-forming region; f = 0.1. (See Bricker &amp; Caffee [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref3">3</xref>] for a discussion of factor f). The <sup>7</sup>Be production rate is calculated assuming that SEPs are characterized by a power law relationship:</p><p>d F d E = k E − r (3)</p><p>where r ranges from 2.5 to 4. For impulsive flares, i.e. r = 4, we use <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0.1 and <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0.3, and for gradual flares, i.e. r = 2.5, we use <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0. For all spectral indices, we assume α/H = 0.1. Contemporary SEP flux rates at the Sun-Earth distance of 1 AU are ~100 protons cm<sup>−2</sup>&#215;s<sup>−1</sup> for E &gt; 10 MeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref22">22</xref>] . We assume an increase in ancient particle fluxes over the current particle flux of ~4 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref4">4</xref>] , yielding an energetic particle flux rate of 3.7 &#215; 10<sup>12</sup> protons cm<sup>−2</sup>&#215;s<sup>−1</sup> for E &gt; 10 MeV at the surface of the proto-Sun.</p><p>The production rates for cosmogenic nuclides can be calculated via:</p><p>p = ∑ i N i ∫ σ i j d F ( E ) d E j d E (4)</p><p>where i represents the target elements for the production of the considered nuclide, N<sub>i</sub> is the abundance of the target element (g&#215;g<sup>−1</sup>), j indicates the energetic particles that cause the reaction, σ i j ( E ) is the cross section for the production of the nuclide from the interaction of particle j with energy E from target i for</p><p>the considered reaction (cm<sup>2</sup>), and d F ( E ) d E j d E is the differential energetic particle</p><p>flux of particle j at energy E (cm<sup>−2</sup>&#215;s<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref22">22</xref>] . We assume gaseous oxygen target particles of solar composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>The cross-section we use to calculate <sup>7</sup>Be production from protons and <sup>4</sup>He pathways is from Sisterson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref24">24</xref>] , and the cross-section we use for production from <sup>3</sup>He is from Gounelle et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref25">25</xref>] . The Sisterson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref24">24</xref>] cross-section is experimental obtained, and the Gounelle et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref25">25</xref>] cross-section is a combination of experimental data, fragmentation and Hauser-Feshbach codes. The uncertainty associated with model codes are at best a factor of two. Taking into account both target abundance and nuclear cross-sections, the reaction with oxygen as the target is the primary production pathway. Any other nuclear reaction would add little to the overall <sup>7</sup>Be production rate. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the nuclear reactions considered in the calculations.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The content of <sup>7</sup>Be found in refractory material, in atoms g<sup>−1</sup>, predicted by SWIM is given by:</p><p>N 7 Be = P S = p ⋅ f M ˙ D ⋅ X r ⋅ F (5)</p><p>where P is given atoms s<sup>−1</sup> and S is given in g&#215;s<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>Using the refractory mass inflow rate, S, of 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup> g&#215;s<sup>−1</sup> from Equation (1), and calculations of P, the effective ancient <sup>7</sup>Be outflow rate, from Equation (2) &amp; Equation (4), we determine the content of <sup>7</sup>Be in CAIs in atoms g<sup>−1</sup> using Equation (5), and find the associated isotopic ratio for different flare parameters given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> depicts the <sup>7</sup>Be isotopic ratio predicted by the SWIM from SEPs.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Similar to <sup>10</sup>Be, the primary target for SEP production of <sup>7</sup>Be is oxygen. As such, the SEP origin of <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>10</sup>Be are uniquely intertwined. The estimated <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>10</sup>Be production ratio from MeV SEPs in the early solar system is estimated to be ~70 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref14">14</xref>] . Using the production rate from Equation (4) and the production rate for <sup>10</sup>Be from Bricker &amp; Caffee [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref2">2</xref>] from SEP interaction with oxygen targets, we obtain a production ratio of ~50, which is similar to Leya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref14">14</xref>] . It would then be expected that the original ratio of <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be found in CAIs would be ~50 times greater than the <sup>10</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio, assuming the simple SWIM mechanism described above. Using 9.5 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref13">13</xref>] as the canonical <sup>10</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio, the <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio would scale to 4.8 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup>. We find this ratio is reproducible within a factor of ~5, the uncertainty associated with SWIM, for spectral indices r &gt; 3.2. The SWIM can account for the scaled up <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> below details the ratio of <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be from SWIM to 4.8 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup>.</p><p>Experimentally obtained measurements for the original <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio in CAIs are limited and a matter of considerable debate. Limited experimentally determined values for the ratio range from about 1.2 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref11">11</xref>] to 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90161-ref10">10</xref>] . The experimentally obtained ratios are at least a factor of 10 less than SWIM</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nuclear reactions considered in this paper</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>16</sup>O(p, x)<sup>7</sup>Be</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>16</sup>O(<sup>3</sup>He, x)<sup>7</sup>Be</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>16</sup>O(<sup>4</sup>He, x)<sup>7</sup>Be</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Predicted <sup>7</sup>Be content in CAIs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Flare Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >atoms g<sup>−1</sup> (in CAIs)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Isotopic Ratio</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p = 2.7, <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#215; 10<sup>16</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p = 4, <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p = 4, <sup>3</sup>He/H = 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#215; 10<sup>15</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 &#215; 10<sup>−1</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>calculations, and also a factor of at least 10 less than the scaled up <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be found from scaling the canonical <sup>10</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio to <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>10</sup>Be production rates. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> depicts the ratio of SWIM obtained ratio to the canonical <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio.</p><p>Clearly, some other mechanism is needed to explain the overproduction of the</p><p><sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be ratio, both in terms of SWIM calculations and the scaling of the <sup>10</sup>Be/<sup>9</sup>Be to relative <sup>7</sup>Be and <sup>10</sup>Be production rates.</p><p>An assumption of SWIM is that radionuclides are produced via SEP interaction and then immediately incorporated into CAI precursor materials. With a half-life of 53 days, it is possible that some temporal evolution occurs before <sup>7</sup>Be becomes implanted. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows days to canonical ratio for spectral index.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows that with a delay on the order of ~100 days from the time of production of <sup>7</sup>Be to implantation in to CAI precursor materials, the canonical ratio is replicated. Taking into account the time from production of the radionuclide to implantation into CAI precursors, i.e., two half-lives of <sup>7</sup>Be, explains the deficit in <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>10</sup>Be measured ratio in comparison to the <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>10</sup>Be production ratio. It is possible and likely for nuclei to have some finite residence time in the photosphere. Calculations of this residence time have not been performed and are beyond the scope of this paper. Our ad hoc choice of two half-lives of residence time for <sup>7</sup>Be was to explain the <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>10</sup>Be measured ratio in comparison to the <sup>7</sup>Be/<sup>10</sup>Be production ratio.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bricker, G.E. (2019) Early Solar System Solar Wind Implantation of <sup>7</sup>Be into Calcium-Alumimum Rich Inclusions in Primitive Meteortites. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2019.91002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.90161-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounelle, M., Chaussidon, M. and Montmerle, T. (2007) Irradiation in the Early Solar System and the Origin of Short-Lived Radionuclides. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339, 885-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.09.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bricker, G.E. and Caffee, M.W. (2010) Solar Wind Implantation Model for 10Be in CAIs. Astrophysical Journal, 725, 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/443</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bricker, G.E. and Caffee, M.W. (2013) Incorporation of 36Cl in Calcium-Aluminum-Rich Inclusions in the Solar Wind Implantation Model. Advances in Astronomy, 2013, Article ID: 487606. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/487606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feigelson, E.D., Garmire, G.P. and Pravdo, S.H. (2002) Magnetic Flaring in the Pre-Main-Sequence Sun and Implications for the Early Solar System. Astrophysical Journal, 572, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1086/340340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishiizumi, K. and Caffee, M.W. (2001) Beryllium-10 from the Sun. Science, 294, 352-354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062545</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bricker, G.E. (2013) Calculation of 10Be and 14C in the Solar Atmosphere: Implication for Solar Flare Spectral Index. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3, 17-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2013.32A003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jull, A.J.T., Lal, D., McHargue, L.R., Burr, G.S. and Donahue, D.J. (2000) Cosmogenic and Implanted Radionuclides Studied by Selective Etching of Lunar Soils. Nuclear Instruments &amp; Methods in Physics Research Section B, 172, 867-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(00)00232-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaeger, M., Wilmes, S., K&amp;ouml;lle, V., Staudt, G. and Mohr, P. (1996) Precision Measurement of the Half-Life of 7Be. Physical Review, C54, 423-424. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.54.423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandzhavidz, N., Ramaty, R. and Kozlovsky, B. (1997) Solar Atmospheric and Solar Flare Accelerated Helium Abundances from Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy. Astrophysical Journal, 489, L99-L102. https://doi.org/10.1086/310965</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaussidon, M., Robert, F. and McKeegan, K. (2006) Li and B Isotopic Variations in an Allende CAI: Evidence for the In Situ Decay of Short-Lived 10Be and for the Possible Presence of the Short-Lived Nuclide 7Be in the Early Solar System. Geochimica et Cosmochimiva Acta, 70, 224-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.08.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, R. and Marhas, K. (2018) Fossil Record of 7Be and 10Be in a Cai: Implications for the Origin and Early Evolution of Our Solar System. 81st Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society, Moscow, 22-27 July 2018, Article ID: 6125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishiizumi, K., Imamura, M., Caffee, M., Southon, J., Finkel, R. and McAnich, J. (2007) Absolute Calibration of 10Be AMS Standards. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 258, 403-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.01.297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McKeegan, K., Chaussidon, M. and Robert, F. (2000) Incorporation of Short-Lived 10Be in a Calcium-Aluminum-Rich Inclusion from the Allende Meteorite. Science, 289, 1334-1337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1334</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leya, I., Wieler, R. and Halliday, A.N. (2003) The Predictable Collateral Consequences of Nucleosynthesis by Spallation Reactions in the Early Solar System. Astrophysical Journal, 594, 605-616. https://doi.org/10.1086/376795</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duprat, J. and Tatischeff, V. (2008) On Non-Thermal Nucleosynthesis of Short-Lived Radionuclei in the Early Solar System. New Astronomy Reviews, 52, 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2008.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, F.H., Shang, H. and Lee, T. (1996) Toward an Astrophysical Theory of Chondrites. Science, 271, 1545-1552. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5255.1545</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, F.H., Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E. and Lee, T. (1997) X-Rays and Fluctuating X-Winds from Protostars. Science, 277, 1475-1479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5331.1475</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, F.H., Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E. and Lee, T. (2001) The Origin of Chondrules and Refractory Inclusions in Chondritic Meteorites. Astrophysical Journal, 548, 1029-1050. https://doi.org/10.1086/319018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, F.H., Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E. and Rehm, K.E. (1998) Protostellar Cosmic Rays and Extinct Radioactivities in Meteorites. Astrophysical Journal, 506, 898-912. https://doi.org/10.1086/306284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calvet, N., Briceno, B., Hernandez, J., Hoyer, S., Hartmann, L., Sicila, Megeath, S.T. and D’Alessio, P. (2005) Disk Evolution in the Orion OB1 Association. Astronomical Journal, 129, 935-946. https://doi.org/10.1086/426910</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ward-Thompson, D. (1996) The Formation and Evolution of Low Mass Protostars. Astrophysics &amp; Space Science, 239, 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00653775</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Reedy, R.C. and Marti, K. (1991) Solar-Cosmic-Ray Fluxes during the Last 10 Million Years. In: Sonnet, C.P., Giampapa, M.S. and Mathews, M.S., Eds., The Sun in Time, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 260-287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lodders, K. (2003) Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements. The Astrophysical Journal, 591, 1220-1247. https://doi.org/10.1086/375492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sisterson, J., et al. (1997) Measurement of Proton Production Cross Sections of 10Be and 26Al from Elements Found in Lunar Rocks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 123, 324-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00409-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90161-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounelle, M., Shu, F.H., Shang, H., Glassgold, A.E., Rehm, K.E. and Lee, T. (2006) The Irradiation Origin of Beryllium Radioisotopes and Other Short-Lived Radionuclides. The Astrophysical Journal, 640, 1163-1189. https://doi.org/10.1086/500309</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>