<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Acoustics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-5786</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oja.2018.84006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJA-90137</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparison of Threshold Power between Methylene Blue Degradation and KI Oxidation Reaction Using Ultrasound
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daisuke</surname><given-names>Kobayashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chiemi</surname><given-names>Honma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hideyuki</surname><given-names>Matsumoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Katsuto</surname><given-names>Otake</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atsushi</surname><given-names>Shono</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Applied Chemistry, Tokyo Denki University, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Renewable Energy Research Center, Department of Energy and Environment, Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Koriyama, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>61</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Ultrasound is used in various chemical reaction processes, and these reactions are influenced by ultrasonic frequency. A threshold power is required for the ultrasonic degradation reaction and oxidation reaction caused by hydroxyl radicals, and the cavitation threshold power is also influenced by frequency generally. In this study, the effects of frequency on the threshold power of methylene blue degradation and KI oxidation were investigated in the range between 22.8 kHz and 1640 kHz. The threshold power of KI oxidation reaction increased with increasing frequency. This phenomenon well agrees with previous study, and it is revealed that the generation of 
  I&lt;sup&gt;-&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;sub style=&quot;margin-left:-5px;&quot;&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; ion is caused by oxidation reaction of I
  <sup>ˉ</sup> ions with hydroxyl radicals. On the other hand, the threshold power of methylene blue degradation reaction was not affected by frequency. The ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue is considered to be caused by hydroxyl radicals, and there is a linear relationship between degradation rate constant and sonochemical efficiency value. However, it is guessed that the degradation of methylene blue is occurred inside cavitation bubble by pyrolysis at high frequency regions.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Degradation</kwd><kwd> Methylene Blue Degradation</kwd><kwd> KI Oxidation</kwd><kwd> Frequency</kwd><kwd>  Threshold Power</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently, ultrasound is used in various applications, and a frequency between 20 kHz and 2 MHz is mainly used in chemical reaction process such as synthesis of fine particles and decomposition of hazardous organic compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref1">1</xref>] . The efficiency and rate of reaction in an ultrasonic field are influenced by frequency. In general, the maximum sonochemical effect caused by a cavitation has been observed around 300 kHz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref17">17</xref>] , and sonochemical efficiency value (SE<sub>KI</sub>) has been proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref18">18</xref>] . SE<sub>KI</sub> is often useful for evaluating the effect of frequency on sonochemical reaction rate quantitatively.</p><p>In our previous study, the effects of frequency on ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue as a model hazardous organic compound have been investigated, and a simple model for estimating the apparent degradation rate constant using SE<sub>KI</sub> value, ultrasonic power, initial concentration, and sample solution volume is proposed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref16">16</xref>] . Moreover, it is observed that a threshold power is required for degradation reaction to progress, and frequency has less influence on threshold power for degradation reaction of methylene blue. In general, cavitation threshold power is influenced by frequency, because the ultrasonic frequency is increased so the rarefaction phase shortens and it is necessary to increase the ultrasonic power to maintain an equivalent amount of cavitational energy in the system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref1">1</xref>] . The cavitation threshold power has been investigated by observable secondary effects, such as microstreaming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref19">19</xref>] , free radical generation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref20">20</xref>] , and so on. For example, ten times more ultrasonic power is required to make water cavitate at 400 kHz than at 10 kHz. On the other hand, the results of our previous study do not agree with conventional phenomenon. However, the effects of frequency and reactant on threshold power have not been investigated well.</p><p>In this study, the ultrasonic degradation reaction of methylene blue and ultrasonic oxidation reaction of KI were carried out, and the effects of ultrasonic frequency and power on degradation rate constant of methylene blue and generation rate of I 3 − ion were examined. In addition, the effects of frequency on the threshold power of methylene blue degradation reaction and KI oxidation reaction were compared, and the effects of ultrasound on these two reactions were investigated.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Procedure</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Methylene Blue Degradation Reaction</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the complete experimental apparatus. A stainless steel vibration plate with an attached PZT transducer (Honda Electronics Co., Ltd.) was installed in the center of a bath at its bottom. The diameter of the vibration plate was 100 mm; the diameters of 22.8 and 127 kHz transducers were 45 mm each, whereas those of 490, 940, and 1640 kHz transducers were 50 mm each. The transducers were driven by a power amplifier (1040L, E&amp;I), which in turn was driven by a continuous sinusoidal wave produced using a signal generator (WF1974, NF Corp.). The effective electric power input to the transducer was calculated from the voltage at both ends of the transducer, and the current was</p><p>measured using both an oscilloscope (TDS3012C, Tektronix Inc.) and a current probe (TCP202, Tektronix Inc.). A glass reactor with variable vertical position was located in the center of the vibration plate. The diameter and approximate volume of the reactor were 85 mm and 10<sup>−3</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The temperature of the ultrasonic bath was maintained constant by circulating thermostat water.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the experimental conditions for methylene blue degradation. Process variables were defined as follows: the ultrasonic frequency (f), ultrasound output power (P), initial methylene blue concentration (C<sub>0, MB</sub>), distance between the ultrasonic transducer and bottom of the reactor (L<sub>1</sub>), distance between the ultrasonic transducer and level of the water bath (L<sub>2</sub>), and irradiation time (t). The volume of the sample solution (V) and temperature of the water bath (T) were maintained constant. Before ultrasonic irradiation, the sample solution and remaining space in the reactor were deoxygenated with a nitrogen gas flow for 20 min at 298 K. After de-oxygenation, the sample was irradiated with ultrasound under a continuous nitrogen gas flow (0.1 L/min).The wavelength of ultrasound depended on ultrasonic frequency, and reaction field is influenced by irradiation distance. Therefore, the reaction was carried out at the optimum condition for various frequencies. Moreover, the temperature of water bath increased by ultrasonic irradiation. Thus, the temperature of the water bath was maintained by circulation of thermostatic water.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. KI Oxidation Reaction</title><p>The experiment was carried out using the same apparatus as methylene blue degradation reaction. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows experimental conditions for KI oxidation. The initial KI concentration was defined as C<sub>0,KI</sub>, and other process variables were the same as the above mentioned methylene blue degradation reaction.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Analysis</title><p>After ultrasonic irradiation, the methylene blue concentration (C<sub>MB</sub>) was determined by measuring absorbance of the sample at a wavelength of 665 nm using a UV-Vis spectrometer (Agilent 8453, Agilent Technologies). The measured</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The experimental conditions of methylene blue degradation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ultrasonic power</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reactor’s position</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial concentration of methylene blue</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Irradiation time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample volume</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>0,MB</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[kHz]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[W]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mm]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mm]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[K]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mol/L]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[min]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[L]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >298</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.00001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The experimental conditions of KI oxidation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ultrasonic power</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reactor’s position</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial concentration of KI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Irradiation time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample volume</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >L<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>0,KI</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[kHz]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[W]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mm]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mm]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[K]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[mol/L]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[min]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[L]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >298</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>absorbance was converted to a concentration value using a standard curve for methylene blue.</p><p>The concentration of I 3 − ion, which was generated by oxidation reaction of I<sup>−</sup> ion, was also analyzed by measuring absorbance of the sample at a wavelength of 355 nm using a UV-V is spectrometer (ε = 26303 L/mol cm).</p><p>The ultrasonic power level in the reactor was measured by a calorimeter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref21">21</xref>] . Equation (1) gives the calculated ultra-sonic output power (P).</p><p>P = ( d T / d t ) &#215; c p &#215; M (1)</p><p>Here, c<sub>p</sub> was the heat capacity of water, M was the mass of water, T was the temperature of the sample solution, and t was the ultrasonic irradiation time. Ion exchanged water was used as the sample solution (volume, 0.1 L).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect of Ultrasonic Irradiation Conditions on Methylene Blue Degradation</title><p>From the results of our previous study, the apparent rate constant of ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue was evaluated using a pseudo-first-order reaction model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref16">16</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the effect of ultrasonic power on the apparent degradation rate constant in the range of frequency of 22.8 kHz and 1640</p><p>kHz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref15">15</xref>] . The effects of frequency on degradation rate constant have been discussed in our previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref16">16</xref>] . It is also observed that the degradation rate constant increases with ultrasonic power, and there is a linear relationship between degradation rate constant and power at every frequency (22.8 kHz, 127 kHz, 490 kHz, 940 kHz, and 1640 kHz). Henglein and Gutierrez have investigated the sonication of aqueous KI, and reported that the initial response of iodine yield appears to proportional to power, but this effect is reduced beyond 40 W and drops dramatically above 100 W [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref22">22</xref>] . The degradation rate constant appears to proportional to power, because the ultrasonic power in this study is less than 20 W. In addition, a threshold power is existed for degradation reaction to progress, and it is found that the threshold power is not affected by ultrasonic frequency.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Ultrasonic Irradiation Conditions on KI Oxidation</title><p>When ultrasound was irradiated into an aqueous KI solution, I<sup>−</sup> ions were oxidized to give I<sub>2</sub>. When excess I<sup>−</sup> ions were present in solutions, I<sub>2</sub> reacts with the excess I<sup>−</sup> ion to form I 3 − ion. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the effect of ultra-sonic power on the generation rate of I 3 − ion at the frequencies of 127, 490, and 1640 kHz. The generation rate of I 3 − ion was influenced by ultrasonic frequency, and the generation rate at 127 and 490 kHz was higher than that at 1640 kHz. These phenomena also agree with previous reported results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref18">18</xref>] . It is also observed that the generation rate increases with ultrasonic power, and there is a linear relationship between generation rate and power at every frequency. Moreover, a threshold power is also existed for oxidation reaction to progress, and it is found that the threshold power is affected by ultrasonic frequency.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Frequency on Threshold Power</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the effect of ultrasonic frequency on the threshold power of methylene blue degradation and KI oxidation reaction. In the KI oxidation reaction</p><p>process, the ultrasonic frequency affects the threshold power, and the threshold power increases with increasing frequency. This phenomenon well agrees with previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref1">1</xref>] . Thus, it is clarified that the generation of I 3 − ion was caused by oxidation reaction of I<sup>−</sup> ions with hydroxyl radicals.</p><p>On the other hand, in the methylene blue degradation reaction process, it is observed that the threshold power is not affected by frequency, and the threshold power is almost same value in every frequency, and it is about 2 W. When the frequency is lower than 130 kHz, the values of threshold power of KI oxidation reaction and methylene blue degradation reaction are almost same. However, when the frequency is higher than 500 kHz, the value of threshold power of KI oxidation is higher than that of methylene blue degradation, and the difference becomes large with increasing frequency. In our previous study, there is a relationship between SE<sub>KI</sub> value and degradation rate constant of methylene blue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref16">16</xref>] . In addition, it has been reported that the ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue is enhanced by TiO<sub>2</sub> particle addition under dark condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref25">25</xref>] , and the presence of TiO<sub>2</sub> particle accelerates the generation of hydroxyl radicals during ultrasonic irradiation even in the absence of UV irradiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref26">26</xref>] . Moreover, it has been also reported that the ultrasound and TiO<sub>2</sub> particle exhibit synergistic effects in the degradation of azo dye of acid orange 8, and the origin of the synergistic effect is considered to be the formation of additional hydroxyl radicals by TiO<sub>2</sub> particle from the extra hydrogen peroxide produced by ultrasound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90137-ref27">27</xref>] . From the results of these studies, it is suggested that the degradation of methylene blue by ultrasound is caused by hydroxyl radicals, and the threshold power in the ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue increases with increasing frequency. However, the threshold power did not increase with increasing frequency. Therefore, it is guessed that the mechanism of degradation of methylene blue changes with frequency. When the frequency is lower than 130 kHz, the degradation of methylene blue is mainly occurred around cavitation bubbles by hydroxyl radicals. On the other hand, when the frequency is higher than 500 kHz, it is guessed that the degradation of methylene blue is occurred inside cavitation bubble by pyrolysis. However, this hypothesis has not been clarified yet. It is necessary to divide the degradation mechanism into hydroxyl radical decomposition and pyrolysis. Therefore, the effect of radical scavenger addition on the ultrasonic degradation of methylene blue will be investigated for various frequencies in the future.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The ultrasonic degradation reaction of methylene blue and ultrasonic oxidation reaction of KI were carried out by various frequencies in the range between 22.8 kHz and 1640 kHz. The threshold power was required for both degradation reaction and oxidation reaction. The threshold power of KI oxidation reaction increased with increasing frequency, and the threshold power of methylene blue degradation reaction was not affected by frequency. The mechanism of KI reaction was the oxidation reaction of I<sup>−</sup> ions with hydroxyl radicals. The degradation of methylene blue was also caused by hydroxyl radicals. However, the degradation of methylene blue was occurred inside cavitation bubbles by pyrolysis, when the frequency was higher than 500 kHz.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kobayashi, D., Honma, C., Matsumoto, H., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2018) Comparison of Threshold Power between Methylene Blue Degradation and KI Oxidation Reaction Using Ultrasound. Open Journal of Acoustics, 8, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.4236/oja.2018.84006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.90137-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mason, T.J. (2000) Sonochemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pétrier, C., Jeunet, A., Luche, J.-L. and Reverdy, G. (1992) Unexpected Frequency Effects on the Rate Oxidative Processes Induced by Ultrasound. Journal of American Chemical Society, 114, 3148-3150. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00034a077</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Entezari, M.H. and Kruus, P. (1994) Effect of Frequency on Sonochemical Reactions. I: Oxidation of Iodide. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 1, S75-S79. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4177(94)90001-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pétrier, C., Lamy, M.-F., Francony, A., Benahcene, A. and David, B. (1994) Sonochemical Degradation of Phenol in Dilute Aqueous Solutions: Comparison of the Reaction Rates at 20 and 487 kHz. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 98, 10514-10520. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100092a021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pétrier, C. and Francony, A. (1997) Ultrasonic Waste-Water Treatment: Incidence of Ultrasonic Frequency on the Rate of Phenol and Carbon Tetrachloride Degradation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 4, 295-300.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(97)00036-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mark, G., Tauber, A., Laupert, R., Schuchmann, H.-P., Schulz, D., Mues, A. and von Sonntag, C. (1998) OH-Radical Formation by Ultrasound in Aqueous Solution—Part II: Terephthalate and Fricke Dosimetry and the Influence of Various Conditions on the Sonolytic Yield. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 5, 41-52.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(98)00012-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kojima, Y., Koda, S. and Nomura, H. (2001) Effect of Ultrasonic Frequency on Polymerization of Styrene under Sonication. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 8, 75-79.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(00)00064-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beckett, M.A. and Hua, I. (2001) Impact of Ultrasonic Frequency on Aqueous Sonoluminescence and Sonochemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105, 3796-3802. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003226x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lesko, T., Colussi, A.J. and Hoffmann, M.R. (2006) Sonochemical Decomposition of Phenol: Evidence for a Synergistic Effect of Ozone and Ultrasound for the Elimination of Total Organic Carbon from Water. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 6818-6823. https://doi.org/10.1021/es052558i</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asakura, Y., Nishida, T., Matsuoka, T. and Koda, S. (2008) Effects of Ultrasonic Frequency and Liquid Height on Sonochemical Efficiency of Large-Scale Sonochemical Reactors. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 15, 244-250.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.03.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sáez, V., Esclapez, M.D., Bonete, P., Walton, D.J., Rehorek, A., Louisnard, O. and González-Garcia, J. (2011) Sonochemical Degradation of Perchloroethylene: The Influence of Ultrasonic Variables, and the Identification of Products. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 18, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.03.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Son, Y., Lim, M., Khim, J., Kim, L.-H. and Ashokkumar, M. (2012) Comparison of Calorimetric Energy and Cavitation Energy for the Removal of Bisphenol—A: The Effects of Frequency and Liquid Height. Chemical Engineering Journal, 183, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, B., Cho, E., Park, H. and Khim, J. (2011) Sonophotocatalytic Destruction of Chloroform: Comparison of Processes and Synergistic Effects. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 50, 07HE10. https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.50.07HE10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, D., Honma, C., Suzuki, A., Takahashi, T., Matsumoto, H., Kuroda, C., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2012) Comparison of Ultrasonic Degradation Rates Constants of Methylene Blue at 22.8 kHz, 127 kHz, and 490 kHz. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 19, 745-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, D., Honma, C., Matsumoto, H., Takahashi, T., Kuroda, C., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2014) Kinetics Analysis for Development of a Rate Constant Estimation Model for Ultrasonic Degradation Reaction of Methylene Blue. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 21, 1489-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.12.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, D., Honma, C., Matsumoto, H., Takahashi, T., Shimada, Y., Kuroda, C., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2014) Effect of Ultrasonic Frequency and Initial Concentration on Degradation of Methylene Blue. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 53, 07KE03. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.53.07KE03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dolores, R., Raquel, S. and Adianez, G.-L. (2015) Sonochemical Synthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Loaded with Folate and Cisplatin: Effect of Ultrasonic Frequency. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 23, 391-398.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.08.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koda, S., Kimura, T., Kondo, T. and Mitome, H. (2003) A Standard Method to Calibrate Sonochemical Efficiency of an Individual Reaction System. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 10, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(03)00084-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elder, S.A. (1959) Cavitation Microstreaming. The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 31, 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907611</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carmichael, A.J., Mossoba, M.M., Riesz, P. and Christman, C.L. (1986) Free Radical Production in Aqueous Solutions Exposed to Simulated Ultrasonic Diagnostic Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 33, 148-155. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26807</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Contamine, R.F., Wilhelm, A.M., Berlan, J. and Delmas, H. (1995) Power Measurement in Sonochemistry. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2, S43-S47.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4177(94)00010-P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henglein, A. and Gutierrez, M. (1990) Chemical Effects of Continuous and Pulsed Ultrasound: A Comparative Study of Polymer Degradation and Iodide Oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 94, 5169-5172.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/j100375a073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, D., Shimakage, K., Honma, C., Matsumoto, H., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2015) Effect of Particle Addition on Ultrasonic Degradation Reaction Rate. Open Journal of Acoustics, 5, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.4236/oja.2015.53006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Honma, C., Kobayashi, D., Matsumoto, H., Takahashi, T., Kuroda, C., Otake, K. and Shono, A. (2013) Effect of Particle Addition on Degradation Rate of Methylene Blue in an Ultrasonic Field. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 52, 07HE11.  
https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.52.07HE11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shimizu, N., Ogino, C., Dadjour, M.F. and Murata, T. (2007) Sonocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue with TiO2 Pellets in Water. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 14, 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2006.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shimizu, N., Ogino, C., Dadjour, M.F., Ninomiya, K., Fujihira, A. and Sakiyama, K. (2008) Sonocatalytic Facilitation of Hydroxyl Radical Generation in the Presence of TiO2. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 15, 988-994.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90137-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selli, E. (2002) Synergistic Effects of Sonolysis Combined with Photocatalysis in the Degradation of an Azo Dye. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 4, 6123-6128.  
https://doi.org/10.1039/b205881b</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>