The study was conducted at Dirab Experiments and Agricultural Research Station, South of Riyadh (24˚24.6140’N, 46˚39.3960’E; 584 above sea level).

The experimental design was a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) that consists of three blocks (lines of planting). The experimental plot was managed under the corridor of River red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) stands as a natural shade (Figure 1). Instead of the artificial shade, the natural shade was chosen to represent the real condition. Twenty seedlings of Sweet acacia

(Vachellia farnesiana) with relatively similar height and diameter were planted in each block at a 5 × 5 m² spacing in March 2017. Three different treatments were established and categorized into Line 1 (without shade), Line 2 (shade until 09:00 a.m.), and Line 3 (shade until 11:00 a.m.). The stress condition after acclimatization and also summer season (April-October 2017) were important to be considered to make sure the seedling survival and establishment. Therefore, the measurements were started eight months after planting and periodically assessed from November 2017 until April 2018.

Several morphological parameters include the seedling height, the stem diameter, the increment of height and the diameter, the number of branches were measured periodically. Also, the number of fruits was observed following the fruit’s season. Height was measured from the ground to the highest point of the live crown. Stem diameter was measured at 10 cm above the ground surface. While the number of branches was considered by counting only the main branch (its size determined between the size of stem and twigs). The height and diameter increments were calculated from differences between two measurements in the two consecutive sets of values. Two plants from the second- and third-line were excluded from measurements due to some plants in the first-line which perpendicular to the other line was dry.

Data (means ± SD, n = 54) were statistically analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using RCBD with SAS software (SAS Institute, ver. 9.2, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The block efficacy was observed whether significant difference or not. Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at 0.05 level was used to compare the significant difference between the block.

An ample seedling growth variation due to the effect of shading occurred between the lines of planting. In all parameters, the seedling growth was significantly influenced by shading, with F = 7.12; p < 0.00 for height, F = 15.99; p < 0.00 for diameter, F = 7.16; p < .00 for the number of branches, and F = 4.9; p < 0.05 for the number of fruits. Seedling height was lowest in Line 2, differed 1.98% from Line 1 and 5.22% from Line 3 (Figure 2(a)). The diameter was lowest in Line 1, differed 9.21% from Line 2 and 27.91 from Line 3 (Figure 2(b)). The number of branches was drastically declined because of the pruning practices in January 2018. In any case, Line 3 was always highest than the other (Figure 2(c)). Similarly, the number of fruits showed that Line 3 produced more plenty fruits with the difference about 31.75% from Line 2 and 155.4% from Line 1 (Figure 2(d)).

The prior study had been reported that the growth rate of V. farnesiana is strongly limited by drought and to some extent shade (need full sun) [30] . However, the dissimilar result was shown in this study. The seedling growth was significantly increased by shading treatment, even though plant species is categorized as intolerant species. It is not surprising due to the tolerant characteristics may vary as trees age, or if the trees grow on different site or region [28] . Some species might be tolerant for the entire life (e.g. balsam fir), while the other might be more tolerant when either younger (white pine) or older period (black spruce) [31] . Evidence came from the study of the effect of light availability on the growth of underplanted seedlings of Dombey’s beech [32] . That reflected no difference in shade tolerance of this species which is not reliable with prior studies that have described that Dombey’s beech performs to be more successful in the large opening canopy [33] .

Shade basically helps to diminish the amount of solar heat radiation reaching the plants and to protect the plant from the excessive light intensity [34] . The latter aspect is risky to the plant because promoting photo-oxidation which generates a reduction of plant productivity as a result of photo-inhibition [35] . Moreover, shade would affect not only the amount of light received by plants but also alter the microscale conditions, e.g. ground temperature, humidity, air, CO₂ [36] . Then, a relationship might be assumed between drought conditions in the site area which limited the growth of V. farnesiana, with the benefit of shading on plant growth. It expected to influence the plant growth by changing the plant niche and mostly it changes the morphology [37] . For example, biomass allocation could be shifted from belowground part to aboveground part as a strategy of shade-acclimated plants [38] . Thus, the seedling growth under shading might have a favorable condition for supporting their growth and it appeared from the visual appearance of V. farnesiana in this study (Figure 3). The difference of seedling height, however, was not as much increased as that of diameter. It might be happened due to the ability of shade-intolerant species to maintain their height growth under shade condition by expanding the diameter and root growth [39] [40] .

Furthermore, the productivity and fruit size in Line 3 were obviously plentiful and larger than the other lines (Figure 4). Another study on different plant species reported that shade is also believed to slow down the fruit maturation, which in turn outcomes in a better and larger fruit [34] . However, the effects vary and the inconsistency has occurred in several studies. For example, shading had no effects on yield and fruit size of Navel orange, albeit the fruit’s color improved [41] . It might be depended on shade intensity, shading period, local climate, and light requirement [42] [43] . The facilitation effect of shade has recurrently been exhibited in alpine and arid conditions [44] . Generally, the results of this experiment noticeably indicate that an absence of shade does not always represent the most favorable condition, though the species as recognized as shade-intolerant species.

Seedling height (∆H) and diameter (∆D) increment were significantly different following a growth period with the highest were attained by Line 3 (Figure 5). The differences growth pattern exhibited after January 2018 (2 - 3) for both height and diameter. The peak of height increment was in March 2018 (4 - 5), whilst diameter increment reached it in February 2018 (3 - 4). As an additional information, the cold season occurred in November-December 2017 (1 - 2) thereupon time to time start to be warm, the pruning practice was done in January 2018 (2 - 3), the flowering period began in March 2018 (4 - 5), and the fruiting phase appeared in April 2018 (5 - 6). Generally, pruning practice was significantly increased the seedling height and diameter increment about 21.21% and 32.09%, respectively, from the previous month. Yet, the height and diameter increment decreased significantly at the fruiting phase about 28.68% and 39.99%, respectively, from the previous month.

Seasonal differences and dynamic pattern in plant growth, commonly, has been known and it usually fluctuates within a year. Trees rapidly grow at the relative wet and warm season than the dry and cold season [45] . In line with this experiment, the growth of the plant was low during the cold season and starts to increase following the further period (Figure 5). Consequently, the plants require more resources to support their growth. It has been known that the arid ecosystem is occupied by the nutrient-poor soil. The low nutrient availability has been indicated to constraint the ability of plants to utilize light [46] . Here, shade seems to be an important factor to facilitate the plants growing on infertile soil and to avoid the plants exposed to excessive light. Instead, at the fertile soil where the light turns out to be a limiting factor, then competition for soil nutrient may inhibit the ability of plants to concurrently compete for getting the light [47] . Hence, shade treatment will be leading the negative effect on plant growth at the fertile soil [48] .

The practice of pruning was significantly increased tree growth. This result suggests that the pruning treatment as a part of silviculture management strategy may apply to improve tree growth, stand structure, and tree volume, especially to enhance the wood quality by diminishing live crown or branches [49] [50] . In

line with another study, the effect of pruning on diameter growth was higher rather than height growth [50] [51] . Actually, the other factors are needed to get the better understanding, such as leaf area index, leaf physiology, photosynthesis capacity, nutrients, water availability, and crown architecture [52] . Moreover, it might take into account that several studies had been reported there was an inconsistency of the results whether positive [53] , negative [54] , or no effects [55] . It might be happened because of several aspects such as plant species, genetic, site quality, stand structure, pruning techniques, and etc. [50] .

Another phenomenon was observed in this study is the reduction of seedling growth during the fruiting phase. As is well-known, an inverse relationship between vegetative and reproductive growth is commonly detected [56] . There are two factors that have been reported from another study which may relate to this phenomenon. First, vegetative development is reduced by the presence of fruits [57] . The dense fruits can inhibit the shoot number and growth, and vice versa [56] [58] . Second, the fruit loads can alter the source-sink equilibriums and affect the storage or utilization of reserves and carbon allocations [56] . As a brief conclusion, this result indicates that seedling growth is resource-limited due to fruit development. The fruits development as a major resource-demanding sink seems to regulate the utilization and accumulation of reserves thus inhibit the vegetative growth.