<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AiM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Microbiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3402</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aim.2018.812070</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AiM-89597</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degradation by Endophytic Fungi from the Ecuadorian Amazon
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernando</surname><given-names>Marín</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hugo</surname><given-names>Navarrete</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexandra</surname><given-names>Narvaez-Trujillo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Biological Sciences, PUCE, Quito, Ecuador</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Center for Research on Health in Latin America (CISeAL), College of Exact and Natural Sciences, PUCE, Quito, Ecuador</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1029</fpage><lpage>1053</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The capacity of 133 fungal endophyte isolates for degrading petroleum hydrocarbons was evaluated. The endophytes were isolated from leaf and stem tissues from 23 plants collected in a natural habitat contaminated with crude oil in southwestern Ecuador. Their capacity for hydrocarbon biodegradation was tested by an 
  in vitro colorimetric qualitative test during 10 days, using the Minimal Salt Medium and crude oil as the carbon source. Taxonomic identification of the endophytic fungi that showed bioactivity in the qualitative test was carried out by analysis of the ITS gene of the region 18S of the rDNA. Endophytes showed the best results in the previous qualitative test where selected for a quantitative 
  in vitro test for 30 days. Residual hydrocarbons were tracked by infrared spectroscopy (IR) and gas chromatography (GC) with a flame ionization detector. The maximum removal rates of total petroleum hydrocarbons were 99.6% (IR) and 99.8% (GC), corresponding to fungi of the genus 
  Verticillium sp. and 
  Xylaria sp. 1 respectively. This is the first report of biodegradation of crude oil hydrocarbons by endophytic fungi in a tropical ecosystem. The results suggest these fungal isolates are potential hydrocarbon biodegraders that could be used in bioremediation processes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fungal Endophyte</kwd><kwd> Biodegradation</kwd><kwd> Bioremediation</kwd><kwd> Hydrocarbon</kwd><kwd> Infrared Spectroscopy</kwd><kwd> Gas Chromatography</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Petroleum is a non-renewable resource of economic importance for several countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref1">1</xref>] , including Ecuador. However, crude oil exploitation is a highly contaminant industry. Water and soil pollution might occur in any stage of production. In a highly biodiverse country, as Ecuador, the impact on habitats for local flora and fauna is concerning, in addition to the effects on people’s health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHs) are categorized into four broad classes of chemical compounds, namely, the aliphatic, aromatic, resin-based, and asphaltene-based hydrocarbons. Each group possesses different physicochemical characteristics and susceptibility to degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>All hydrocarbon compounds derived from petroleum sources are generally described as total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and are categorized as aromatic, aliphatic, resin-based and asphaltene-based hydrocarbons. Aliphatic hydrocarbons correspond to linear or cyclic hydrocarbon chains of variable size and structure. It is widely studied for their uses as fuels and solvents. Aromatic hydrocarbons have a variable structure, size and complexity and range from monocyclic structure compounds to compounds formed by long and complex chains, constituted by aromatic rings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref6">6</xref>]. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been mostly studied, because some of them constitute a wide variety of products of biological, chemical and industrial importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref6">6</xref>]. However, they are also among the pollutants with the greatest biological impact due to their carcinogenic and mutagenic effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref9">9</xref>]. Degradation of these different compounds is highly related to their physical chemical characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Microbial groups, such as bacteria, yeast, and fungi have been identified as principal agents in the degradation of PHs, even though their degradation efficiencies are varying. However, bacteria are the most active and primary degraders of spilled oil in the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref13">13</xref>]. Remediation techniques have been developed using microorganisms, such as bacteria, yeast and fungi, with varying degradation efficiencies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref14">14</xref>]. It is generally suggested that these microorganisms have the metabolic capacity to use hydrocarbons as a carbon source [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref15">15</xref>]. Also phytoremediation is considered as cost-efficient and eco-friendly and can be implemented after an initial degradation either by bioremediation or physical, chemical and thermal processes.</p><p>Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons using native bacterial and fungal isolates from the Ecuadorian soil microbiome has been previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref14">14</xref>]. Generally, bioremediation techniques rely on bacteria given their rapid reproduction cycles, their voracity and the facilities for the study of their metabolic pathways [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref17">17</xref>]. However, recently various studies have reported fungal organisms that exceed bacterial capacities in hydrocarbon biodegradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>]. Fungi are used due to their particular metabolic capacities, which mediate the transformation of a wide variety of organic compounds to less complex compounds that are later incorporated into their metabolisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref20">20</xref>] ; these processes are facilitated due to the characteristics of their complex enzymatic system and their vigorous hyphae growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref21">21</xref>]. Thus, they offer an undeniable potential for their use in bioremediation processes, accordingly, the study of the diversity and identification of species and fungal strains of biotechnological utility should be a priority in an avid field of constant innovation such as environmental bioremediation.</p><p>In recent years, endophytic fungi have generated major attention in the scientific community due to their wide diversity and particular metabolic capacities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref22">22</xref>]. These microorganisms colonize plant tissues, without causing damage or apparent symptoms of disease in their host [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref24">24</xref>]. They are located in the intercellular spaces and the symplast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref25">25</xref>]. Plant and fungi coexist, establishing between them a mutualistic interaction, dependent on the virulence of the fungus and the defenses of the plant. Both elements are influenced by environmental factors and the developmental stage of each organism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref27">27</xref>].</p><p>Plant-endophyte interaction, be it with bacterial or fungal endophytes, generally improve plant adaptation to the environment by increasing tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress, changes in temperature and salinity, development of resistance to diseases, herbivory, insects, nematodes, bacteria and other pathogenic fungi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref28">28</xref>]. The development of resistance to normally lethal or highly hazardous pollutants, such as crude oil, occurs when plants are able to metabolize harmful compounds by extracellular enzymes secreted by endophytic fungi, this process could be developed inside the plant or at soil level by enzymatic secretion through the root [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref29">29</xref>].</p><p>In Ecuador, main oil reservoirs are found in the Cretaceous Hollin and Napo geological formations in the Oriente basin. The Oriente basin, which covers about 100,000 km<sup>2</sup>, lies between the Andes on the west and the Guyana shield on the east. The basin extends northward into the Putumayo basin in Colombia, and southward into the Maranon basin in Peru [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref30">30</xref>]. The principal reservoir, the Lower Cretaceous Hollin Formation is characterized by structurally controlled oil accumulations found in the Cretaceous sandstones of this formation. Geochemical analyses indicate that the oil migrated into these structures from Cretaceous source rocks in the eastern Cordillera and southernmost Oriente basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref31">31</xref>]. The oil is trapped in structures of Cretaceous-Oligocene age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref32">32</xref>]. On the Hollin-Loreto roadway that connects Ecuador’s capital city, Quito, to the Ecuadorian Amazon basin, outcrops can be observed with these oil accumulations. Various plant species have colonized, adapted and proliferated successfully in habitats contaminated with petroleum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref33">33</xref>] , with this consideration in mind, the vegetation found on the outcrops on the Hollin-Loreto roadway most probably exhibit similar adaptive features.</p><p>Therefore, the exploration and identification of the endophytic fungal diversity these plants harbor could lead to the discovery of fungi with metabolic capacities to biodegrade petroleum hydrocarbons by using these as a carbon source, facilitating the adaptation and host plants survival to adverse conditions. These findings could contribute to the innovation and development of new technologies for environmental bioremediation.</p><p>This study is primarily aimed to describe plant fungal endophytic diversity of plant communities in a tropical lowland ecosystem exhibiting long term petroleum contamination, as well as to evaluate petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation capacities of the endophytic fungi isolated from plants adapted to crude oil contaminated habitats.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling Site and Plant Collection</title><p>The collection site is located at the locality “Las Minas” Km 10.1 roadway Holl&#237;n-Loreto, Napo Province, Ecuador (0˚42'39.63&quot;S, 77˚44'33.13&quot;W). The zone is contaminated with crude oil from natural springs. Botanical samples for taxonomic identification were collected from plants growing on oil outcrops. Leaves and stems samples were collected in zip-lock bags from each plant for endophytic fungi isolation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Endophytic Fungi Isolation from Plant Tissues</title><p>Stem samples were surface sterilized and segments of each stem tissue were removed by longitudinal cuts and incubated in Petri dishes with Water Agar (WA) and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA 1:10), at room temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref34">34</xref>]. Leaf samples were sterilized, then cut into small quadrangular fragments (0.5 mm<sup>2</sup>) and incubated in Petri dishes with Malt Extract Agar (MEA 1:10) at room temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref27">27</xref>]. Each fungus isolated from stem and leaf tissues were transferred to Petri dishes with the 1X PDA by the terminal hyphae method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref34">34</xref>] , where it remained in culture for seven days.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Qualitative Oil Degradation Essays by Endophytic Fungi</title><p>To determine hydrocarbon degradation bioactivity by the endophytic fungal isolates colorimetric tests were carried out on 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks, with 50 ml Minimum Salts Medium (MSM) enriched with 1% crude oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref35">35</xref>] as a carbon source, Tween<sup>&#210;</sup>80 as surfactant and Dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCFIF) as metabolic activity indicator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>]. Three agar plugs (1 cm<sup>2</sup>) with individual fungi from axenic cultures of seven days growth were added to the culture medium. This assay was incubated at room temperature, with continuous agitation at 180 rpm during the entire experimental time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>]. The reduction of culture medium, hence usage of petroleum hydrocarbons, were evidenced by gradual color change of the medium over a 10 day period, from deep blue to colorless, these results were tabulated estimating the degree of clarification of the culture media [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>]. Additionally, a negative control was carried out using a non-petroleum tolerant fungus. All essays were carried out in triplicate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Quantitative Degradation Essays and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation by Infrared Spectroscopy and Gas Chromatography</title><p>The endophytic fungi that showed the highest levels of clarification in the qualitative essays were selected for these essays. Three endophyte fungus plugs (1 cm<sup>2</sup>) from axenic cultures of seven days growth were added to 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks with 50 ml of MSM enriched with 1% crude oil and Tween<sup>&#210;</sup>80 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref35">35</xref>]. The assay was incubated at room temperature with continuous agitation at 180 rpm during the entire assay. The amount of persistent hydrocarbon in the medium was evaluated after 30 days incubation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref35">35</xref>]. Additionally, a negative control without endophyte was carried out. All the essays were carried out in triplicate. To determine hydrocarbon removal rate, residual petroleum oil were extracted from the culture medium and subjected to a Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis using infrared (IR) spectroscopy at PUCE’s Center for Environmental and Chemical Services (CESAQ-PUCE).</p><p>Five endophytes with the best results by IR quantification were selected for evaluation of hydrocarbon degradation capacity by gas chromatography (GC). This new hydrocarbon degradation test was carried out in the same conditions as described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref35">35</xref>]. Once the experiment concluded, the mycelium was removed from the liquid phase by filtration. A liquid-liquid ultrasound assisted extraction was performed with the liquid phase, with 6 ml of dichloromethane (DCM) and 5 ml of culture medium, sonicated with a Branson<sup>&#210;</sup>3800 water bath for three periods of 5 min each. The organic phase was recovered after the mixture decantation with two additional portions of DCM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref36">36</xref>]. The recovered phase was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, concentrated with a rotary evaporator and the resulting volume was adjusted to 2 ml with DCM. The final extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) (Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph), with flame ionization detector (FID), Agilent DB-TPH capillary column (30 m &#215; 320 μm &#215; 0.25 μm). The injector and detector temperatures were 250˚C and 320˚C, respectively. The programmed parameters were 40˚C for 1 min, a ramp from 40˚C to 220˚C with increments of 8˚C/min. The final temperature of 220˚C was maintained for 1 min. The control sample was prepared with 2 ml of DCM.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Taxonomic Identification of Endophytic Fungi</title><p>The taxonomic identity of the endophytes classified as degraders in the qualitative assays was determined by sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the 5.8S gene of ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Thus, DNA extractions were performed with Chelex<sup>&#210;</sup> 100 in accordance with previously reported procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref38">38</xref>]. Subsequently, the extracted DNA was amplified using the primers ITS1 (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref39">39</xref>]. The Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a 50 μl mixture containing 10 μl of Green GoTaq<sup>&#210;</sup> Flexi Buffer 1X, 5 μl of MgCl<sub>2</sub> (25 mM), 1 μl of dNTPs (10 mM), 2.5 μl of each primer (ITS1 and ITS4) (30 μM), 5 ηg/μl of the template, 0.5 μl of Taq polymerase (5 units/μl) and 23.5 μl of Milli-Q<sup>&#210;</sup> autoclaved water. PCR amplifications were performed using the following protocol: 1 min initial denaturation at 95˚C; 30 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 95˚C, 30 sec primer annealing at 55˚C and 1 min extension at 72˚C; 5 min extension at 72˚C and a final holding at 4˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref40">40</xref>] , the resulting amplicons were sequenced at Macrogen<sup>&#210;</sup> (Seoul, South Korea).</p><p>For phylogenetic identification of endophytic fungi, the consensus sequences were analyzed by comparing them with other ITS sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI GenBank<sup>&#210;</sup>) database using the Basic Local Alignment Sequence Tool fornucleotide (BLASTn) search. For taxonomic identification, the highest homology sequences obtained by the BLASTn search were used in alignment with the consensus sequences using the bioinformatic software Muscle (Multiple sequence alignment by log-expectation) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref41">41</xref>]. Finally, a phylogenetic tree of maximum likelihood was constructed with 130 sequences from the isolated fungi, using the bioinformatic program RAxML (Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref42">42</xref>] applying the nucleotide substitution model GTR ɣ (General Time Reversible) and 1000 bootstrap replicates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref43">43</xref>] ; Spizellomyces punctatus (Chytridiomycota) was used as external group.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>A natural-logarithm transformation was used to normalize the TPH (ppm) quantification data distribution, corroborated with a Shapiro-Wilk test (p &lt; 0.05). Subsequently, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with the IR TPH quantification data and a Tukey multiple comparison test was performed (p &lt; 0.05). The data analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS, version 22).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Plant Sample Identification</title><p>A total of 23 plants were collected at “Las Minas” sit developing on rocky substrates exhibiting crude oil or on mud (mixture of crude oil, earth and water). The 23 plants were classified in 12 angiosperm families, 1 gymnosperm and 1 bryophyte (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The botanical samples were taxonomically identified by the Pontificia Universidad Cat&#243;lica del Ecuador Herbarium (HQCA) staff. Among the angiosperms, the families Melastomataceae, Boraginaceae and Poaceae are predominant in the area, reaching together 70% of the vegetation present, while the rest of vegetation is represented by the families Rubiaceae, Gunneraceae and Urticaceae, among others (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Two botanical samples were not identified due to the limited material collected; in both cases the plants were unique individuals and exhibited reduced size.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Endophytic Fungi Isolation</title><p>A total of 156 endophytic fungi were isolated from stem and leaf samples obtained from the 23 plant specimens collected; these 156 isolates were grouped into 133 morphotypes.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Qualitative Oil Degradation Essays by Endophytic Fungi</title><p>The qualitative tests showed several endophytic isolates with crude oil degrading</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Taxonomic identification of the collected plants and number of endophytes isolated per plant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Endophytes isolated</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MELASTOMATACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GLEICHENIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gleichenia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARATTIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marattia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POLYPODIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polipodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ORCHIDACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >LYCOPODIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lycopodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BORAGINACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MELASTOMATACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conostegia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CYPERACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BRYOPHYTA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BORAGINACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MELASTOMATACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Miconia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >crassa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GUNNERACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unidentified</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EUPHORBIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Croton</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >URTICACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cecropia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >maxima</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BIGNONIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jacaranda</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RUBIACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FM023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >POACEAE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>capacities (40% of the isolates) while the remaining fungi none showed any growth in the culture media (60% of the isolates). The parameter evaluated was the culture medium clearance degree, according to visual observation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In these essays, 10 fungi completely cleared the medium before the 10 days established to conclude the test. The remaining fungi showed partial or null changes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Quantitative Essays and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Determination</title><p>The fungi with the best qualitative assay performance (10 endophytes) were subjected to a test that allows quantification of petroleum hydrocarbons in the culture medium at the beginning and at the end of the essay. Among the fungi with better performance are Clonostachys sp. 2, Aspergillus sp., Verticillium sp.,</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Positive results of endophytic fungi for hydrocarbon qualitative biodegradation essays. Clarification level: mild (+), medium (++), total (+++)</title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Result</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clarification level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N4992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >19</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5037</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >++</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5088</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N4995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >++</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive partial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 days</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Colletotrichum sp. 1, Phomopsis sp. 1 and Xylaria sp. 1, all of them with a hydrocarbon removal rate average higher than 90% at the end of the essay. However, individuals with lower degrading capacities such as Clonostachys sp. 1, Colletotrichum sp. 2, Colletotrichum sp. 3 and Saccharicola sp. 1, with degradation levels higher than 31% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The TPH results obtained previously by IR quantification were corroborated by a new TPH analysis quantified by GC and carried out only with the fungi that showed the best results (5 endophytes) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The TPH evaluation by GC allowed the identification of aliphatic compounds (octane, nonane, undecane, dodecane and tetradecane) and aromatics (1,2,3-trimethylbenzene, trans-decahydro naphthalene, 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene and pentamethylbenzene) in the control samples. While the culture media where the endophytic fungi were incubated showed that most of the compounds detected in the controls were completely degraded by the fungi Aspergillus sp. and Xylaria sp. 1. The fungi Clonostachys sp. 2, Verticillium sp. and Colletotrichum sp. 1 showed total degradation of the compounds identified in the controls with the exception of n-nonane that showed partial degradation to the controls (14%, 15% and 19% respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Taxonomic Identification of Endophytic Fungi</title><p>A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was generated with 53 endophytic fungi that showed hydrocarbon-degrading bioactivity in the qualitative essays, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The phylogenetic analysis showed a total diversity of three phyla, subdivided in 5 classes, 12 orders, 17 families and 14 genera. The majority of fungal isolates belong to the Ascomycota phylum (94.3%), which represents the dominant lineage. The most abundant class is Sordariomycetes, with 81% of the isolates. The greatest number of fungal isolates are classified within the Diaporthales and Xylariales orders, 26% and 22% of the isolates respectively. Within the Diaporthales</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Hydrocarbon removal rates quantified by infrared spectroscopy (IR) and gas chromatography (GC)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Endophyte</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >IR</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CG</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Removal rate%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Removal rate%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Verticillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Quantification of persistent petroleum hydrocarbons in the culture medium by gas chromatography (GC) after 30 days of incubation with endophytic fungi</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Verticillium sp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus sp.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Retention time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Area</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-octane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.675</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93,622</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-nonane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,2,3-trimetil bencene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34,895</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trans-decahidro naftalene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >1,2,4,5-Tetrametil bencene</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >11.003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >28,923</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-undecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-dodecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.482</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124,133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pentametil bencene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204,225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >n-tetradecane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.868</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241,542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>order, the family Diaporthaceae is mostly represented by the genus Diaporthe, with 4.5% of isolates. Within the Xylariales order, the family Xylariaceae stands out as the only representative, whose members belong to the genus Xylaria. Colletotrichum, genus belonging to the Glomerellaceae family, highlights for being the most represented with 5.3% of the fungal isolates. Two isolates only could be identified upto order level, one isolate until class level and one at family level. The endophytic fungus Sordariomycetes sp. did not show close homology to any identified specimen at a higher taxonomic level than class. Xylariales sp., Pleosporales sp. and Pyriculariaceae sp. isolates showed a 90%, 94% and 91% BLAST homology level based, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The Shapiro-Wilk test showed a normal distribution of the transformed data, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, demonstrating the existence of highly significant differences (p &lt; 0.01) between groups (endophytes versus control). The Tukey multiple comparison analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) showed differences between endophytes, constituting homogeneous subgroups based on the degree of variability of the means of each treatment. Three subgroups were established; the first subgroup, comprising the five performing endophytes was selected for an additional trial with CG.</p><table-wrap-group id="5"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Taxonomic identification of 53 hydrocarbon-degrading endophytic fungi isolates. Abreviations: Collection of endophytes Quito-Cat&#243;lica (CEQCA), percentaje of identity (ID), query cover percentaje (QC)</title></caption><table-wrap id="5_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ID (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >QC (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genus and species (BLAST)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Established ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N4992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe passiflorae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N4995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma viride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hypocreaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cytospora sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Verticillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Verticillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plectosphaerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys rosea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bionectriaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bionectriaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria adscendens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coprinellus disseminatus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coprinellus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psathyrellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria discolor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coniella sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coniella sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Schizoparmaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariales sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariales sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cytospora sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis asparagi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe nothofagi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum taiwanense</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe australafricana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="5_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >18</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5042</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >99</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >100</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum kahawae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleosporales sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pleosporales sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lophiostomataceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neopestalotiopsis protearum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsis sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsidaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nemania sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria plebeja</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp. 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5060</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lophiostomataceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5063</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum kahawae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola bicolor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lophiostomataceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe citri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe stewartii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthe sp. 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria enteroleuca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyriculariaceae sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyriculariaceae sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pyriculariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5088</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cercospora sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mycosphaerellacae sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mycosphaerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria berteri</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsis sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsis sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsidaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum Karstii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Umbelopsis ramanniana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mucoraceae sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mucoraceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nemania sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diaporthaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nemania sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum lindemuthianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glomerellaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neopestalotiopsis clavispora</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsis sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pestalotiopsidaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylariaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus esclerotiorum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichocomaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cytospora sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valsaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spadicoides sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helmisthosphaeriaceae sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Helminthosphaeriaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyporus tricholoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyporus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyporaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium chrysogenum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichocomaceae</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEQCA-N5122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sordariomycetes sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sordariomycetes sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Tukey multiple comparisons analysis with the results of the quantification of HTP by infrared spectroscopy</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Endophyte</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Subgroup</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharicola sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phomopsis sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2433</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clonostachys sp. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colletotrichum sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9667</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1633</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylaria sp. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Verticillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6800</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8433</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.054</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.088</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Plant adaptation to highly contaminated habitats is restricted to a handful of species that tolerate such conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref44">44</xref>]. Evidence has shown that endophytes contribute to plant adaptation to stress conditions, stimulating growth, productivity, carbon sequestration and tolerance to contaminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref45">45</xref>].</p><p>Deng and Cao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref45">45</xref>] suggested that the degree of substrate contamination by hydrocarbons negatively affect plant species diversity and abundance. However, the sampling site of this study exhibits geological oil outcrops with typical Amazonian tropical humid forest vegetation developing in situ, turning this area into a point of interest for the diversity study and capabilities of endophytic fungi from plants adapted to this type of habitat.</p><p>The endophytic fungi isolates were subjected to in vitro tests to evaluate their hydrocarbon biodegradation capacity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref18">18</xref>]. The qualitative essays showed the hydrocarbon biodegradation potential of 53 endophytic fungi, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The essays are based on the fact that during microorganisms’ oxidation reactions, electrons are transferred to an electron acceptor such as oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>), nitrates ( NO 3 − ) or sulfates ( SO 4 2 − ) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref47">47</xref>]. By incorporating an electron accepting reagent into the culture medium, such as DCPIP, it is possible to demonstrate the organisms’ capacities to use petroleum hydrocarbons as a carbon source through the DCPIP color change, from blue (oxidized) to colorless (reduced) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref48">48</xref>]. This redox technique demonstrates that 53 fungal isolates possess the ability to degrade crude oil. Within these 53 endophytes, a subgroup composed of 10 individuals presented outstanding results in the qualitative essays, clarifying completely the culture medium in less time than established for the essay (&lt;10 days) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>With exception of plant families Orchidaceae sp. and Poaceae sp., all the collected plants have fungal organisms with variable capacities to degrade hydrocarbons in this essay. Evidence obtained by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref49">49</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref50">50</xref>] demonstrates the plant endophytic composition could be affected by contaminants, stimulating the proliferation of organisms tolerant to these conditions. Interestingly, the plants with the highest number of endophytic isolates, Marattia sp. (Marattiaceae) and FM006 (unidentified), with 12 and 10 isolates respectively, correspond to plants with the highest number of fungi with hydrocarbon biodegradation capacities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), this results support the hypothesis that endophytes contribute to a better adaptation of the host plant to contaminated substrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>Twenty-three plant samples were collected in the site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), including stem and leaves samples. The families Melastomataceae, Boraginaceae and Poaceae stood out for their predominance in the area, representing up to 70% of the species present in the area.</p><p>To a lesser degree, individuals from the families Rubiaceae, Gunneraceae and Urticaceae were found. A previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref33">33</xref>] reported several families in common with this study (Melastomataceae, Boraginaceae, Poaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Bignoniaceae and Rubiaceae) as common species in the tropical Ecuadorian rainforest but evidenced an abnormally higher abundance of them in contaminated secondary forest in contrast to unpolluted secondary forest and pristine forest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref33">33</xref>]. In our study the predominant families were Melastomataceae, Rubiaceae, Fabaceae and Euphorbiaceae. The marked predominance of the individuals of the family Melastomataceae could demonstrate a relationship between the family and the colonization of this type of habitat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref33">33</xref>]. Likewise, the highest number of fungal endophytes were isolated from plants species of the Melastomataceae, Marattiaceae, Polypodiaceae and Euphorbiaceae which may indicate a strong interaction between the plant and the fungal endophytes, similar to bacteria that are in intimate association with plants which are known to consume alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbon exudates granting them the capacity to in degrade organic contaminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref51">51</xref>].</p><p>A total of 133 endophytic fungi were isolated from stem and leaf tissues of 23 plants species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These figures are congruent with the suggestion that Ecuadorian endophytes are hyperdiverse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref52">52</xref>]. The taxonomic positions of 53 fungi were established through a phylogenetic analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The phylogenetic tree shows the four phyla in the fungi kingdom, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Zygomycota and Spizellomyces punctatus (phylum Chytridiomycota) as outgroup. The analysis shows that most of the isolated ascomycetes constitute the orders Diaporthales, Xylariales and Glomerellales.</p><p>Within the order Diaporthales 14 fungi isolates belonging to three families were identified: Diaporthaceae, Valsaceae and Schizoparmaceae. Among the 14 isolates of the order Diaporthales, the endophyte Phomopsis sp. 1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) showed a hydrocarbon removal rate of 90.7%. Biodegradation of phenanthrene and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid has been reported by fungi from the genus Phomopsis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref54">54</xref>] ; however, this is the first report of crude oil biodegradation for fungi from the genus.</p><p>Within the Xylariales order, 12 fungi were identified, 11 belonging to the family Xylariaceae and 1 identified until order level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Among the 12 individuals, the endophyte Xylaria sp. 1 showed a hydrocarbons removal rate of 98.8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Pyrene and benzopyrene biodegradation has been reported by Xylaria regalis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref55">55</xref>] but there are no reports to crude oil biodegradation.</p><p>The order Glomerellales groups 8 fungi, all belonging to the family Glomerellaceae and the genus Colletotrichum (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Within this order, three individuals with hydrocarbon removal rates ranging from 70.4% to 97.5% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Colletotrichum gleosporoides is known to produce extracellular lipases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref56">56</xref>] , enzymes that have been widely studied for their ability to degrade hydrocarbons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref58">58</xref>].</p><p>However, when submitting Colletotrichum gleosporoides to hydrocarbon biodegradation essay the lipase production capacity was inhibited, possibly due to the impact of the toxic experimental conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref58">58</xref>].</p><p>The order Hypocreales has three identified isolates; the hydrocarbon removal rate to Clonostachys sp. 1 was 31.5% and 97.4% to Clonostachys sp. 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). There are no previous reports about hydrocarbon biodegradation by individuals from the genus Clonostachys. But, metabolic capacities studies with individuals from the genus Clonostachys determine zearalenones biodegradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref59">59</xref>].</p><p>Aspergillus sp. showed a removal rate of 97.6% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Previous studies conducted with free-living fungi reported the capacities of Aspergillus fumigatus and Penicillium chrysogenum for the production of laccases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref58">58</xref>] , family of enzymes that are actively involved in the hydrocarbons biodegradation processes by oxidizing them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref58">58</xref>]. Additionally, there are biodegradation reports of phenanthrene, pyrene and benzopyrene by Aspergillus niger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref60">60</xref>]. Biodegradation of fluoranthene by Penicillium sp., Pyrene by Penicilliumjanczewskii and P. janthinellum and crude oil by Penicillium sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref62">62</xref>]. These works results were obtained with free-living fungi but, belong to the same genus of the endophytes of our study, thus believe the enzymes involved in hydrocarbon biodegradation processes could be the same ones already reported.</p><p>The order Pleosporales is represented by four fungi, three belong to the genus Saccharicola, family Lophiostomataceae (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The endophyte Saccharicola sp. 1 showeda hydrocarbon removal rate of 78.9% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This is the first report of hydrocarbon biodegradation by a fungus from the genus Saccharicola (97% ID). However, the production of extracellular protease enzymes has been confirmed in individuals of the genus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref63">63</xref>] , additional studies have identified fungal proteases due to their hydrolytic activity could participate in hydrocarbon degradation processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref58">58</xref>].</p><p>Quantification of TPH by IR is based on the measurement of the absorbed energy to produce stretching and bending vibrations of the molecules. The different functional groups and bond types absorb radiation at different frequencies and intensities. The absorption intensity is directly proportional to the bonds number. This is correlated to the hydrocarbons concentration present in the sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref64">64</xref>]. These results were compared with a control sample to establish the hydrocarbon removal rates.</p><p>Previous studies with the same hydrocarbon biodegradation methodology using free-living mushrooms, reported removal rates ranges from 14.9% to 43.4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref35">35</xref>]. In this study we obtained variable degradation rates, from 31.5% (minimum), to 99.6% (maximum) of hydrocarbon removal, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The analysis also determined a high variation (degradation capacity) among the tested endophytes. The replicates of the trials showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p>Additionally, Tukey multiple comparisons analysis grouped the endophytes that showed statistically homogeneous performances among themselves, establishing 3 subgroups, the first subgroup agglutinates the five endophytes with the best performances (Xylaria sp. 1, Clonostachys sp. 2, Colletotrichum sp. 1, Verticillium sp. and Aspergillus sp.) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). In order to corroborate the results obtained with the best five endophytes, a new analysis was carried out, quantifying the hydrocarbon present in the culture medium by GC. In this TPH quantification method, a mobile phase (inert gas N<sub>2</sub>) and a stationary phase (capillary column) are used to separate the hydrocarbon mixture from the samples in their individual components, carried by the mobile phase through the stationary phase. The separation is carried out by a combination of factors including the boiling point, polarity and affinity differences between the different hydrocarbons and the column, making the concentrations estimation had a greater accuracy and allows establish differences between the quantification methods used.</p><p>Removal rates may be affected by several factors, including the test temperature. In the present study, the tests were carried out at a temperature of 23˚C in absence of an incubator with agitation, but evidence shows that the optimum temperature for carrying out this type of essays ranges between 28˚C and 31˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref66">66</xref>] , suggesting the results could be improved modifying the experimental temperature.</p><p>Another factor was the addition of a surfactant to the culture medium. There are studies where the culture medium was not supplemented with a surfactant to emulsify the mixture between crude oil and water, making the biodegradation process even more complex for the evaluated microorganisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref67">67</xref>]. In this case, Tween<sup>&#210;</sup>80, the surfactant used in this study, is nontoxic and a stimulant of manganese peroxidase production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref68">68</xref>] ; the results obtained indicate that it was the appropriate reagent to optimize the enzymatic activity without toxic effects.</p><p>The crude concentration evaluated in this study was 1%; further studies could evaluate the performance of these endophytic fungi at higher concentrations, the optimum concentrations for fungi range between 1% and 5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref69">69</xref>]. The crude oil concentration used is determinant to obtain optimal results. Evidence provided by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref70">70</xref>] shows that the degradation percentage of a bacterial consortium culture decreased from an initial 78% to 52% by increasing the crude oil concentration from 1% to 10%.</p><p>The results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> demonstrate the enormous potential of isolated fungi to eventual uses in the bioremediation field. Six fungi (Xylaria sp. 1, Clonostachys sp. 2, Colletotrichum sp. 1, Verticillium sp., Aspergillus sp. and Mucoraceae sp.) showed removal rates higher than 90%, under the tested conditions, are highly encouraging results for a fungal assay and even more in the case of endophytic fungi.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref50">50</xref>] isolated endophytic bacteria from roots of plants that growing in a contaminated with crude oil environment and evaluated the capacities to biodegrade crude by bacterial isolates at 1% concentration; obtaining similar hydrocarbon removal rates to those obtained in this study. The isolated Streptomyces sp. HIh9 showed a 97.5% hydrocarbon removal rate after 7 days of incubation, while in our study the endophyte fungus Verticillium sp. showed 99.64% after 30 days of incubation, which evidences that plants harbor endophytic contaminant degrading organisms as adaptation mechanism to hostile habitats, due to the plant alone is unable to metabolize these compounds. This study demonstrates the potential for using fungal endophytes in biodegradation of crude oil, either through biotechnological applications or by improving phytoremediation strategies aiding plants to tolerate contaminant-induced stress, especially in countries with economies based on fossil fuel exploitation.</p><p>Petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation is a complex process, depending on the crude oil nature, composition, environmental conditions and soil microbial community. The presence of hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms is an adaptive response to the environmental contamination conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89597-ref71">71</xref>]. Adaptation mechanisms include selective enrichment and genetic changes that stimulate the complex hydrocarbon biodegradation. The plants forced to develop in this environment stimulate the growth of hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms to detoxify the plant from substances that normally could not be processed by itself. Fifty-three hydrocarbon-degrading endophytic fungi were isolated from plants growing in crude oil contaminated soils at Ecuadorian Amazon. We identified six endophytic fungi that showed Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon removal rates higher than 90% after 30 days of incubation. The endophyte Xylaria sp. 1 showed the best TPH removal rate 98.78% (IR) and 99.8% (CG).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Diversity of fungal endophytes determined in this study supports previous reports of hyperdiversity of this group of microorganisms in Ecuador. Our results suggest that bioremediation processes could potentially use hydrocarbon-degrading endophytic fungi isolated from native plant species growing in natural oil outcrops. These may also be used in support of phytoremediation strategies at later stages of remediation of contaminated sites given that the endophytes isolated from these plant species may present long-term adaptation mechanisms that can improve colonization of contaminated habitats, as well as uptake by plant species.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to acknowledge financial support of this research by the Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador. Plant and endophyte collections were carried out through the Ecuadorian Ministry of the Environment permit 001-14 IC-MC-DBN/MA. We thank Elisa Jara, School of Chemical Sciences at PUCE and the Center of Environmental and Chemical Services of the PUCE (CESAQ-PUCE) for assistance in the evaluation of hydrocarbon biodegradation. Special thanks to Carolina Portero for technical assistance and Javier Carvajal for valuable comments.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mar&#237;n, F., Navarrete, H. and Narvaez-Trujillo, A. (2018) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degradation by Endophytic Fungi from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Advances in Microbiology, 8, 1029-1053. https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2018.812070</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.89597-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fontaine, G. (2013) Sobre Bonanzas y Dependencia: Petróleo y Enfermedad Holandesa en el Ecuador. íconos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales,13, 102-110.https://doi.org/10.17141/iconos.13.2002.628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">San Sebastian, M. and Hurtig, A. (2004). Oil Exploitation in the Amazon Basin of Ecuador: A Public Health Emergency. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 15, 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892004000300014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jadoon, S., Amin, A.A., Malik, A. and Khalel, H. (2016) Effects of Crude Oil Contamination under the Controlled Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of Water in Khurmala and Guwayar, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Journal of Pollution Effeccts and Control, 4, 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, S., Jyot, J., Kuhad, R.C. and Lal, B. (2001) Evaluation of Inoculum Addition to Stimulate in Situ Bioremediation of Oily-Sludge-Contaminated Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 1675-1681. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.4.1675-1681.2001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sugiura, K., Ishihara, M., Shimauchi, T. and Harayama, S. (1996) Physicochemical Properties and Biodegradability of Crude Oil. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 31, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950961r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tisot, B. and Welte, D. (2013) Biological Productivity of Modern Aquatic Environments. Springer Science &amp; Business Media, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peltonen, K. and Kuljukka, T. (1995) Air Sampling and Analysis of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Journal of Chromatography, 710, 93-108.https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)00207-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hurtig, A.K. and San Sebastián, M. (2002) Geographical Differences in Cancer Incidence in the Amazon Basin of Ecuador in Relation to Residence near Oil Fields. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31, 1021-1027.https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.5.1021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cuadras, A., Ramírez, N., Rovira, E., Marcé, R. and Borrull, F. (2012) Evaluación del Riesgo Asociado a la Exposición de Hidrocarburos Aromáticos Policíclicos en la Salud de la Población Residente Alrededor del Complejo Químico de Tarragona. Revista de Salud Ambiental, 12, 14-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raju, M.N. and Scalvenzi, L. (2018) Petroleum Degradation: Promising Biotechnological Tools for Bioremediation. In Recent Insights in Petroleum Science and Engineering. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, S., Jyot, J., Kuhad, R.C. and Lal, B. (2001) Evaluation of Inoculum Addition to Stimulate in Situ Bioremediation of Oily-Sludge-Contaminated Soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 1675-1681.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.4.1675-1681.2001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sugiura, K., Ishihara, M., Shimauchi, T. and Harayama, S. (1996) Physicochemical Properties and Biodegradability of Crude Oil. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 31, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1021/es950961r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, R., Shahzad, S. and Choudhary, M. (2010) Communities of Endophytic Fungi in Medicinal Plant Withania somnifera. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42, 1281-1287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maddela, N.R., Scalvenzi, L. and Venkateswarlu, K. (2017) Microbial Degradation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Crude Oil: A Field-Scale Study at the Low-Land Rainforest of Ecuador. Environmental Technology, 38, 2543-2550.https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1270356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hammel, K.E. (1995) Mechanisms for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Degradation by Ligninolytic Fungi. Environmental Health Perspectives, 103, 41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pieper, D.H. and Reineke, W. (2000) Engineering Bacteria for Bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 11, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00094-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reda</surname><given-names> A.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Bacterial Bioremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Heavy Oil Contaminated Soil</article-title><source> Journal of Applied Sciences Research</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 197</fpage>-<lpage>201</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Nasrawi, H. (2012) Biodegradation of Crude Oil by Fungi Isolated from Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegradation, 3, 147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cerniglia, C.E. (1997) Fungal Metabolism of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Past, Present and Future Applications in Bioremediation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology &amp; Biotechnology, 19, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jim.2900459</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pointing, S. (2001) Feasibility of Bioremediation by White-Rot Fungi. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 57, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530100745</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drevinskas, T., Mickien&amp;#279;, R., Maru&amp;#353;ka, A., Stankevi&amp;#269;ius, M., Tiso, N., Mika&amp;#353;auskait&amp;#279;, J. and Stankevi&amp;#269;ien&amp;#279;, A. (2016) Downscaling the in Vitro Test of Fungal Bioremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Methodological Approach. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 408, 1043-1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-9191-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schulz, B., Boyle, C., Draeger, S., R&amp;#246;mmert, A.K. and Krohn, K. (2002) Endophytic Fungi: A Source of Novel Biologically Active Secondary Metabolites. Mycological Research, 106, 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756202006342</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnold, E.A. (2007) Understanding the Diversity of Foliar Endophytic Fungi: Progress, Challenges, and Frontiers. Fungal Biology Reviews, 21, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2007.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kusari, S., Hertweck, C. and Spiteller, M. (2012) Chemical Ecology of Endophytic Fungi: Origins of Secondary Metabolites. Chemistry &amp; Biology, 19, 792-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strobel, G.A. and Daisy, B. (2003) Bioprospecting for Microbial Endophytes and Their Natural Products. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 67, 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.67.4.491-502.2003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schulz, B., R&amp;#246;mmert, A.K., Dammann, U., Aust, H.J. and Strack, D. (1999) The Endophyte-Host Interaction: A Balanced Antagonism? Mycological Research, 103, 1275-1283. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756299008540</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodriguez, R.J., White, J.F., Arnold, A.E. and Redman, R.S. (2009) Fungal Endophytes: Diversity and Functional Roles. New Phytologist, 182, 314-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaul, S., Gupta, S., Ahmed, M. and Dhar, M.K. (2012) Endophytic Fungi from Medicinal Plants: A Treasure Hunt for Bioactive Metabolites. Phytochemistry Reviews, 11, 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-012-9260-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jordahl, J.L., Foster, L., Schnoor, J.L. and Alvarez, P.J. (1997) Effect of Hybrid Poplar Trees on Microbial Populations Important to Hazardous Waste Bioremediation. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16, 1318-1321. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shanmugam, G., Poffenberger, M. and Toro Alava, J. (2000) Tide-Dominated Estuarine Facies in the Hollin and Napo (“T” and “U”) Formations (Cretaceous), Sacha Field, Oriente Basin, Ecuador. AAPG Bulletin, 84, 652-682.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dashwood, M.F. and Abbotts, I.L. (1990) Aspects of the Petroleum Geology of the Oriente Basin, Ecuador. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 50, 89-117. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1990.050.01.06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Canfield, R.W., Bonilla, G. and Robbins, R.K. (1982) Sacha Oil Field of Ecuadorian Oriente. AAPG Bulletin, 66, 1076-1090.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arellano, P., Tansey, K., Balzter, H. and Tellkamp, M. (2017) Plant Family-Specific Impacts of Petroleum Pollution on Biodiversity and Leaf Chlorophyll Content in the Amazon Rainforest of Ecuador. PLoS ONE, 12, e0169867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strobel, G.A., Dirkse, E., Sears, J. and Markworth, C. (2001) Volatile Antimicrobials from Muscodor albus, a Novel Endophytic Fungus. Microbiology, 147, 2943-2950. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-11-2943</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maddela, N., Scalvenzi, L., Pérez, M., Montero, C. and Gooty, J. (2015) Efficiency of Indigenous Filamentous Fungi for Biodegradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Medium and Soil: Laboratory Study from Ecuador. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 95, 385-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1605-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boonchan, S., Britz, M.L. and Stanley, G.A. (2000) Degradation and Mineralization of High-Molecular-Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Defined Fungal-Bacterial Cocultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 1007-1019. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.3.1007-1019.2000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bucheli, E., Gautschi, B. and Shykoff, A. (2000) Host Specific Differentiation in the Anther Smut Fungus Microbotryum violaceum as Revealed by Microsatellites. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 13, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00160.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camacho, F.J., Gernandt, D.S., Liston, A., Stone, J.K. and Klein, A.S. (1997) Endophytic Fungal DNA, the Source of Contamination in Spruce Needle DNA. Molecular Ecology, 6, 983-987. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00266.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">White, T.J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. and Taylor, J.W. (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Gene for Phylogenetics. In: Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J. and White, T.J., Eds., PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Acadamic Press, New York, 315-322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bascom-Slack, C., Arnold, A. and Strobel, S. (2012) Student-Directed Discovery of the Microbiome and Its Products. Science, 338, 485-486. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment with High Accuracy and High Throughput. Nucleic Acids Research, 32, 1792-1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stamatakis, A. (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Analyses with Thousands of Taxa and Mixed Models. Bioinformatics, 22, 2688-2690. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gladden, J.M., Allgaier, M., Miller, C.S., Hazen, T.C., VanderGheynst, J.S., Hugenholtz, P., Simmons, B.A. and Singer, S.W. (2011) Glycoside Hydrolase Activities of Thermophilic Bacterial Consortia Adapted to Switchgrass. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 5804-5812. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00032-11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lundberg, D.S., Lebeis, S.L., Paredes, S.H., Yourstone, C., Gehring, J., Malfatti, S., Tremblay, J., Engelbrektson, A., Kunin, V., del Rio, T.G., Edgar, R.C., Eickhorst, T., Ley, R.E., Hugenholtz, P., Tringe, S.G. and Dangl, J.F. (2012) Defining the Core Arabidopsis thaliana Root Microbiome. Nature, 488, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, Z. and Cao, L. (2017) Fungal Endophytes and Their Interactions with Plants in Phytoremediation: A Review. Chemosphere, 168, 1100-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutchins, S.R., Sewell, G.W., Kovacs, D.A. and Smith, G.A. (1991) Biodegradation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Aquifer Microorganisms under Denitrifying Conditions. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 25, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00013a005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beller, H.R., Grbi&amp;#263;-Gali&amp;#263;, D. and Reinhard, M. (1992) Microbial Degradation of Toluene under Sulfate-Reducing Conditions and the Influence of Iron on the Process. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 58, 786-793.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanson, K.G., Desai, J.D. and Desai, A.J. (1993) A rapid and Simple Screening Technique for Potential Crude Oil Degrading Microorganisms. Biotechnology Techniques, 7, 745-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peng, A., Liu, J., Gao, Y. and Chen, Z. (2013) Distribution of Endophytic Bacteria in Alopecurus aequalis Sobol and Oxalis corniculata L. from Soils Contaminated by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. PLoS ONE, 8, e83054. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baoune, H., El Hadj-Khelil, A.O., Pucci, G., Sineli, P., Loucif, L. and Polti, M.A. (2018) Petroleum Degradation by Endophytic Streptomyces spp. Isolated from Plants Grown in Contaminated Soil of Southern Algeria. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 147, 602-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lumactud, R. and Fulthorpe, R.R. (2018) Endophytic Bacterial Community Structure and Function of Herbaceous Plants from Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contaminated and Non-Contaminated Sites. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 1926. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01926</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rundell, S.M., Spakowicz, D.J., Narváez-Trujillo, A. and Strobel, S.A. (2015) The Biological Diversity and Production of Volatile Organic Compounds by Stem-Inhabiting Endophytic Fungi of Ecuador. Journal of Fungi, 1, 384-396. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof1030384</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, L.S., Dai, C.C., Zhao, Y.T., Zhao, M., Yong, Y.H. and Wang, X.X. (2007) The Degradation of Phenanthrene by Endophytic Fungi Phomopsis sp. Single and Co-Cultured with Rice. China Environmental Science-Chinese Edition, 27, 757.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Dai, C.C. and Ju, Q. (2011) Biodegradation of 4-Hydroxybenzoic Acid by Phomopsis liquidambari. Applied Soil Ecology, 51, 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, S.C., Chen, M.K., Wei, D.L. and Cheng, M.K. (2007) Isolation and Characterization of a Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-Degrading Enzyme from Xylaria regalis. Fungal Science, 22, 25-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balaji, V. and Ebenezer, P. (2008) Optimization of Extracellular Lipase Production in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides by Solid State Fermentation. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 1, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bezalel, L., Hadar, Y. and Cerniglia, C.E. (1997) Enzymatic Mechanisms Involved in Phenanthrene Degradation by the White Rot Fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 2495-2501.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balaji, V., Arulazhagan, P. and Ebenezer, P. (2014) Enzymatic Bioremediation of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by Fungal Consortia Enriched from Petroleum Contaminated Soil and Oil Seeds. Journal of Environmental Biology, 35, 521-529.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takahashi-Ando, N., Ohsato, S., Shibata, T., Hamamoto, H., Yamaguchi, I. and Kimura, M. (2004) Metabolism of Zearalenone by Genetically Modified Organisms Expressing the Detoxification Gene from Clonostachys rosea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 3239-3245. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3239-3245.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sack, U., Heinze, T.M., Deck, J., Cerniglia, C.E., Cazau, M.C. and Fritsche, W. (1997) Novel Metabolites in Phenanthrene and Pyrene Transformation by Aspergillus niger. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63, 2906-2909.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giraud, F., Guiraud, P., Kadri, M., Blake, G. and Steiman, R. (2001) Biodegradation of Anthracene and Fluoranthene by Fungi Isolated from an Experimental Constructed Wetland for Wastewater Treatment. Water Research, 35, 4126-4136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00137-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cerniglia, C.E. and Sutherland, J.B. (2010) Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Fungi. In: Timmis, K.N., Ed., Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2079-2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alberto, R.N., Costa, A.T., Polonio, J.C., Santos, M.S., Rhoden, S.A., Azevedo, J.L. and Pamphile, J.A. (2016) Extracellular Enzymatic Profiles and Taxonomic Identification of Endophytic Fungi Isolated from Four Plant Species. Genetics and Molecular Research: GMR, 15, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korda, A., Santas, P., Tenente, A. and Santas, R. (1997) Petroleum Hydrocarbon Bioremediation: Sampling and Analytical Techniques, in Situ Treatments and Commercial Microorganisms Currently Used. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 48, 677-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530051115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umanu, G. and Dodo, D.S. (2013) Assessment of Oil-Eating Fungi Isolated from Spent Engine Oil Polluted Soil Environments. The Pacific Journal Science and Technology, 14, 609-616.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, G.O., Fufeyin, P.T., Okoro, S.E. and Ehinomen, I. (2015) Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation &amp; Biodegradation, 3, 28-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hidayat, A. and Tachibana, S. (2013) Crude Oil and n-Octadecane Degradation Under Saline Conditions by Fusarium sp., F092. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 29-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, J., Cong, J., Zhou, J. and Gao, S. (2008) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Biodegradation and Extracellular Enzyme Secretion in Agitated and Stationary Cultures of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20, 88-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60013-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, S., Nomura, N., Nakajima, T. and Uchiyama, H. (2012) Case Study of the Relationship between Fungi and Bacteria Associated with High-Molecular-Weight Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Degradation. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 113, 624-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.01.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, K.S.M., Rahman, T.J., Kourkoutas, Y., Petsas, I., Marchant, R. and Banat, I.M. (2003) Enhanced Bioremediation of n-Alkane in Petroleum Sludge Using Bacterial Consortium Amended with Rhamnolipid and Micronutrients. Bioresource Technology, 90, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00114-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89597-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leahy, J.G. and Colwell, R.R. (1990) Microbial Degradation of Hydrocarbons in the Environment. Microbiological Reviews, 54, 305-315.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>