<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2018.913077</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-89349</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Low Temperature Performance Prediction Model of Cold-Filled SMA-13 Asphalt Mixture
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhaohui</surname><given-names>Sun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Simeng</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shang</surname><given-names>Ma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shuai</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Yueyang Maritime Bureau of the People’s Republic of China, Yueyang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Liaoning Provincial Transportation Development Center, Shenyang, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>The Transportation Engineering School, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>13</issue><fpage>1066</fpage><lpage>1072</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Sets of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture were designed by means of orthogonal design method. The bending and low temperature creep tests of the cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture were carried out. The related models of the fractal dimension and the road performance evaluation index including low temperature bending failure strain ε
  <sub>B</sub> and bending strength RB are established by using fractal theory. The model can be used to predict the low temperature performance of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture according to the design gradation, which can reduce the test workload and improve the working efficiency, so as to provide the reference for engineering design.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Low Temperature Performance</kwd><kwd> Prediction Model</kwd><kwd> Cold-Filled SMA-13 Asphalt Mixture</kwd><kwd> Fractal Dimension</kwd><kwd> Evaluation Index</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The heat compensation method is not suitable for construction in a humid, low temperature environment and pollutes the environment. On the basis of the previous research results at home and abroad, the research group, combined with the characteristics of climate, transportation and materials in Northeast China, independently research and develop cold-filled asphalt mixture suitable for the freezing period and with good road performance. Cold-filled asphalt mixture low-temperature performance is an important component of road performance, especially for the northeastern region. If the correlation model between cold-filled asphalt mixture fractal dimension and low temperature performance evaluation index can be established, the low temperature performance of cold-filled asphalt mixture can be predicted through the gradation fractal dimension to reduce the amount of test work. Based on the correlation analysis between the fractal dimension and the evaluation index of low temperature performance, the low temperature performance prediction model is established and the low temperature performance prediction model of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture is recommended through the comparison of multiple models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref1">1</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Raw Material Performance Test</title><p>Liaohe petroleum asphalt grade A No. 90, which is widely used in the northeast of China and the basic performance test results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref2">2</xref>] .<sup> </sup></p><p>The coarse aggregate of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture use basalt gravel produced by Jilin Dawan Quarry. The basic performance test results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The fine aggregate should be clean, dry, no weathering, no impurities, and appropriate particle size distribution. Fine aggregate use mechanism sand from limestone produced by Liaoyang Xiaotun Yongli quarries. The basic performance test results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>Lignin fiber was used, the basic performance test results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>The variation coefficient of test data in Tables 1-4 is less than 15%.</p><p>24 sets of cold-filled asphalt additive preparation schemes were designed, which were combined with matrix asphalt, thinner and mineral materials to form cold-filled asphalt mixture. The compaction, looseness and low-temperature workability test were tested to select the optimal one. No. 16 cold-filled asphalt liquid was selected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref4">4</xref>] . The raw materials used in the test are all in line with the requirements of the road.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Cold-Filled Asphalt Mixture Design</title><p>The aggregate gradation design scheme and the optimum oil-stone ratio of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> No. 90 Class A asphalt test results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Test items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Test value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specification requirements</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Penetration (25˚C, 100 g, 5 s) 0.1mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 - 100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ductility (15˚C) cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Softening Point (R &amp; B)˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Penetration index PI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.5 - 1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >60˚C Dynamic viscosity (Pa・s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Wax content distillation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Flash point COC (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥243</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Solubility</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥99.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Film heating test 163˚C, 5 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quality loss (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penetration ratio 25˚C (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ductility 10˚C, 5 cm/min (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Basalt coarse aggregate technical index</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Material specification (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 - 16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >9.5 - 13.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4.75 - 9.5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Technical index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard value</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Test value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crushing value (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apparent relative density (T/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water absorption rate (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consistency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤12</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Content of needle and sheet granular (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.075 Particle content (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The technical index of limestone fine aggregate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Material specification (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2.36 - 4.75</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 - 2.36</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 1.18</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Technical index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard value</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Test value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apparent relative density (T/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.687</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.734</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Content of clay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The technical index of lignin fiber</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Test items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Test results</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber length</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;6 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;6 mm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18% &#177; 5%, Non volatile matter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PH value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil absorption rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥5 times quality of fiber</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5% (Quality calculation)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relative density</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Test results</p><p>Trabecular bending test at a temperature of −10˚C were done according to the Standard Test Method of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011). The experimental results and the corresponding fractal dimensions of the low temperature stability for cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89349-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Model building</p><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> that the range of fractal dimension satisfying the low-temperature bending strain is D = 2.5484 - 2.6122, D<sub>c</sub> = 2.0172 - 2.1676, D<sub>f</sub> = 2.6695 - 2.8772.</p><p>The ternary linear regression model is established through taking ε<sub>B</sub> as the dependent variable, taking D, D<sub>c</sub>, D<sub>f</sub> as the independent variables.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The scheme of gradation design of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="11"  >Percentage of quality pass (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oil-stone ratio</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.04</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The fractal dimension of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture and the low temperature test data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gradation number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average maximum load (N)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average span deflection (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bending strain ε<sub>B</sub> (με)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bending strength Mpa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0965</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7723</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5958</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7640</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5643</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7826</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6695</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14201</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8325</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9868</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18666</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0378</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8772</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7224</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5959</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7193</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5489</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7769</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7959</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7833</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SMA13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10639</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5873</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7722</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: The second group of bending strain ε<sub>B</sub> data in the table is subject to further determination. The variation coefficient of test data in the table is less than 15%.</p><p>The correlation model of the bending strain and the fractal dimension is established by the regression analysis, as is shown in Formula (1).</p><p>ε<sub>B</sub> = −432953 − 20571.98D + 99964.86 D<sub>nc</sub> + 104839.34 D<sub>f</sub> (1)</p><p>Regression coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.956.</p><p>The ternary linear correlation models of bending strain and three fractal dimensions are established, the correlations of data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> are analyzed by using SPSS software to obtain the correlation between the bending strain and fractal dimension, as is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>.</p><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, the correlation sequence of low temperature bending strain ε<sub>B</sub> and the fractal dimension D, D<sub>C</sub>, D<sub>f</sub> from large to small is D<sub>f</sub> &gt; D &gt; D<sub>C</sub>, indicating that the relation between the aggregate fractal dimension and bending strain is relatively large, the correlation between ε<sub>B</sub> and D<sub>C</sub> is relatively small.</p><p>The correlation model of ε<sub>B</sub> and D<sub>f</sub> is established, as is shown in the formula (2).</p><p>ε<sub>B</sub> = −115184 + 46204D<sub>f</sub> (2)</p><p>Regression coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.790.</p><p>The correlation model of ε<sub>B</sub> and D, D<sub>f</sub> is established, as is shown in the Formula (3).</p><p>ε<sub>B</sub> = −333868 + 104099D + 28508D<sub>f</sub> (3)</p><p>Regression coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.998.</p><p>Similarly, the ternary linear regression models of bending strength is established, as is shown in the Formula (4).</p><p>RB = 59 + 22.55D − 26.96D<sub>c</sub> − 21.19D<sub>f</sub> (4)</p><p>Regression coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.940.</p><p>For the correlation between the bending failure strength and the fractal dimension, the data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> are analyzed by SPSS software. The relationship between the bending failure strength R<sub>B</sub> and the fractal dimension is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between low temperature bending failure strain and fractal dimension of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>B</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>B</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.651</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.818</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between low temperature bending strength and fractal dimension of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>B</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>B</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.413</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.468</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>c</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.791</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.791</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> The prediction model comparison of bending strain and bending strength for cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Model No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Model expression</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regression coefficient R<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>B</sub> = −432953 − 20571.98D + 99964.86D<sub>c</sub> + 104839.34D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.956</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>B</sub> = −115184 + 46204D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.790</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε<sub>B</sub> = −333868 + 104099D + 28508D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>B</sub> = 59 + 22.55D − 26.96D<sub>c</sub> − 21.19D<sub>f</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.940</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> that the correlation between the bending strength R<sub>B</sub> and the fractal dimension D<sub>C</sub> of the coarse aggregate gradation is relatively large. Therefore, a correlation model between the bending strength and the fractal dimension D<sub>C</sub> can be established. But the regression coefficient is low.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Model Selection</title><p>As described above, a correlation model of low-temperature bending strain, bending strength and fractal dimension is established, and the results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>.</p><p>It can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> that the prediction accuracy of model 1, 3 and 4 is relatively high, and the model 1 and 3 are recommended as the prediction model of low temperature bending strain and the model 4 is recommended as the prediction model of low temperature bending strength through multi-model comparison.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The correlation model recommended between the fractal dimension and the evaluation index of low temperature performance can be used to predict the low temperature performance of cold-filled SMA-13 asphalt mixture according to the design gradation, which can reduce the test workload and improve the working efficiency.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was financially supported by Liaoning Provincial Expressway Operation Management Co., Ltd.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sun, Z.H., Wang, S.M., Ma, S. and Liu, S. (2018) Low Temperature Performance Prediction Model of Cold-Filled SMA-13 Asphalt Mixture. Materials Sciences and Applications, 9, 1066-1072. https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2018.913077</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.89349-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, Z.H. (2017) Asphalt Mixture Mix Design Method. People’s Communications Publishing Co., Ltd., Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89349-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering. JTGE20-2011, Occupation Standard of the People’s Republic of China.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89349-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Test Methods of Aggregate for Highway Engineering. JTGE42-2005, Occupation Standard of the People’s Republic of China.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89349-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Q. (2017) Cold-Filled Asphalt Mixture Design Method. Master Thesis, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89349-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, Z.H., Yu, Q.B., Wang, T.B., Yu, B.Y., Zhu, G.Q. and Ma, J. (2014) The Effect of Asphalt and Aggregate Gradation on the Low-Temperature Performance of Asphalt Mixtures for Intermediate and Underlying Course. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 505-506, 251-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89349-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Highway Science Research Institute and Ministry of Communications Technical Specifications for Construction of Highway Asphalt Pavements. JTGF40-2004.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>