<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2019.91004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-89318</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Age and Gender Dependent Deposition of Crude Nutrients and Energy in Fast Growing Meat-Type Chickens
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Wecke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Frank</surname><given-names>Liebert</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Division of Animal Nutrition Physiology, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>12</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>50</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Two consecutive growth studies were conducted to investigate the age-dependent 
  nutrient and energy deposition in male and female meat-type chickens (Ross 308) based on feather and feather-free body fraction data 
  determined according to the comparative slaughter technique
  . Birds were reared under standardized housing conditions (15 floor pens per gender, 5 birds per pen). Both the starter (day 1 to 22) and grower diets (day 22 to 36) were based on corn, wheat, soybean meal, soybean protein concentrate and crystalline feed amino acids. Diets were formulated to ensure an equal feed protein quality close to the ideal amino acid ratio by adjusting a constant mixture of the feed proteins. Individual body weight (BW) and feed intake per pen were recorded weekly. At the start (day 1) as well as on a weekly basis until the end of the 5th week, 15 birds per gender 
  (each 3 pens of 5 birds) were selected and euthanized following 24 h feed deprivation. Subsequently, the feathers were manually removed and quantified. Crude nutrient analysed in representative samples of both feather and feather-free 
  body fractions. 
  The nutrient and energy deposition in the bodies of both genders were significantly increased with increasing 
  age 
  (p &lt; 0.001)
  . Male birds deposited significantly higher body protein 
  (p &lt; 0.001)
   and female birds significantly more fat and energy in the whole body 
  (p &lt; 0.001)
   during the entire growth period. In contrast, no differences were found in protein contents of the BW gain between genders dependent on age
   (p &gt; 0.05)
  . However, the protein partitioning in the gain of both analyzed body fractions provided oppositional results. Accordingly, male birds yielded relatively more protein in the feather-free body fraction 
  (p &lt; 0.001) 
  and females relatively more feather protein 
  (p &lt; 0.001) 
  as related to the whole body protein gain.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Growing Chickens</kwd><kwd> Growth Performance</kwd><kwd> Feed Deprivation</kwd><kwd> Empty Body Mass</kwd><kwd> Nutrient Deposition</kwd><kwd> Energy Deposition</kwd><kwd> Feather Protein Deposition</kwd><kwd> Age</kwd><kwd> Gender</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Over generations, poultry breeding has significantly improved performance data for broiler chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref2">2</xref>] . However in more recent years, fast selection progress has played an important role for the market meat yield by increasing the body protein deposition potential of present genotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref3">3</xref>] . As already reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref5">5</xref>] , the body composition of recently produced broiler chickens has changed as compared to birds of earlier decades. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the nutrient content is considerably affected by the age and gender of the birds. Otherwise, research on the nutrient deposition in the whole body and body fractions of modern fast growing meat-type broiler chickens during the entire growth period is scarce. But the estimation of such data is continually required in the field of poultry nutrition in order to provide important information for the further optimization of nutrient supply and utilization.</p><p>Therefore, the present study primarily aimed to evaluate growth performance and feed efficiency data based on a well-balanced experimental feed mixture. The yielded data, completed by earlier published results on the age and gender dependent partitioning of the feather and feather-free body fraction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] and their nutrient contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , have laid the foundations for estimating quantitative nutrient and energy deposition data for male and female birds per life week and growth period.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study was conducted with 90 male and 90 female broiler chickens and performed at the facilities of the Division Animal Nutrition Physiology, Department of Animal Sciences at Georg-August-University Goettingen as approved by the Ethic Committee of the Lower Saxony Federal Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES), Germany. The methodical background has been described in detail in previous publications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] , yet for further understanding the following modifications and additional information applied while working with the data in this study are included.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Animals and Housing</title><p>Freshly hatched meat-type broiler chicks (ROSS 308) were obtained from a commercial hatchery and allocated initially in a large floor pen on wood shavings. During the next day (d1) averaged weight birds were randomly divided into 15 pens per gender (each 5 birds per pen) and kept at environmentally-controlled conditions according to the Ross management recommendations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref7">7</xref>] with unlimited access to feed and water. The growth experiment was divided into a starter (d1 to d22) and grower period (d22 to d36). Further details were already reported elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Diets and Feeding</title><p>The utilized starter and grower diet was based on corn, wheat and soybean meal, soybean protein concentrate and crystalline feed AAs as main ingredients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] . Diet formulation aimed to meet or exceed current nutrient and energy recommendations for growing broiler chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref10">10</xref>] . A constant mixture of utilized protein sources yielded equal feed protein quality during both of the feeding periods. The dietary AA concentrations were adjusted to closely match the ideal AA ratios [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Collection and Sampling</title><p>Both at the start of the experiment and weekly up to the end of the 5th week, 15 male and 15 female chickens (each 3 pens of 5 birds) were separately allocated for body composition analysis. Selected birds had continued free access to drinking water, but were fasted for 24 hours in order to empty their digestive tracts to yield an “empty body mass”. Subsequently, these birds were euthanized by CO<sub>2</sub> inhalation according to applicable German animal welfare regulations. Each sample of quantitatively collected feathers and of feather-free empty body was separately stored in plastic bags at −20˚C for further processing as previously described in detail [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Chemical Analyses</title><p>Feed ingredients, experimental diets and the feather and feather-free empty body samples were analysed in duplicates according to method 3.1 (dry matter; DM) and 8.1 (crude ash; CA) of the German standard procedures of VDLUFA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref12">12</xref>] . N content was measured by method 4.1.2 using the DUMAS principle (LECO TruMac<sup>&#169;</sup>, LECO Instrumente GmbH, M&#246;nchengladbach, Germany) and crude protein (CP) was calculated by a factor of 6.25 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref13">13</xref>] . The crude lipid (CL) content of both broiler body fractions was computed as remaining difference of DM after accounting for CA and CP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Performance Parameters</title><p>Individual body weight (BW) and feed intake (FI) per pen were recorded at weekly intervals during the entire growth trial. Based on these data, the average BW gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR; g FI/g BWG) per week, growth period and gender were estimated. The growth study started with 75 birds per gender, respectively. Based on the utilized comparative slaughter technique, at weekly intervals 30 birds (15 per gender, each 3 pens of 5 birds) were removed for body analysis. Accordingly, the number of birds continuously decreased up to the last experimental period at 5 weeks of age. Considering the already reported mean body nutrient composition of each corresponding reference groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , the nutrient deposition was determined by computing the difference between the crude nutrient content in the whole body of birds (feathers plus feather-free body) reared during the growth study at the end and the start of each week or growth period, respectively.The energy deposition was calculated using the factor 23.7 kJ per g accreted body protein and 39.8 kJ per g accreted body fat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref14">14</xref>] . Additionally, the concentration of nutrients and energy in gained BW was estimated as the accreted amount in g or kJ per bird divided by the realized BWG (in kg/bird) within the individual age periods.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS software package (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA; Version 24.0 for Windows). Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare means of calculated variables depending both on age and gender of broiler chickens as main effects, inclusive of their interactions. Verification of variance homogeneity was evaluated by the Levene-test. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were identified both by Games-Howell and Tukey post-hoc tests.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Based on the already reported age and gender dependent BW development of birds during the entire growth period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , the corresponding mean daily FI, BWG and FCR data are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. For all experimental parameters, highly significant differences (p &lt; 0.001) for age and the interaction between age &#215; gender were detected. This also applies to gender-specific BWG and FCR with advantages for male birds over their female counterparts, respectively. In contrast, no significant feed intake differences (p &gt; 0.05) were observed between both genders.</p><p>Based on these zoo-technical results and the already reported body nutrient composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , the age and gender dependent nutrient and energy deposition data were calculated. The mean daily DM, CP, CL, CA and energy deposition in the whole body of broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) was significantly increased with increasing age from week 1 to week 5 (p &lt; 0.001), respectively. Whereas no gender-specific differences between the values of DM deposition were found (p &gt; 0.05), all crude nutrient and energy deposition data were significantly different between male and female birds (p ≤ 0.001). Accordingly, male chickens yielded higher CP and CA deposition, especially during the last three weeks. In contrast, female chickens developed consistently higher daily CL and energy deposition during the individual age periods as compared to their male counterparts. For all deposition data, significant interactions between age and gender were observed.</p><p>In order to determine the nutrient and energy contents in the gained BW from corresponding empty BW data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , the BW loss of birds during the time of feed deprivation must be predicted. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> summarizes the yielded whole and empty BW data depending on age and gender. As assumed, for both parameters</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Zoo-technical data of broiler chickens per week, growth period and gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age (week)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >n<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Feed intake (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Body weight gain (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Feed conversion ratio (g/g)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2 3 4<sup>2</sup> 5<sup>3</sup> Mean 1 - 3<sup>4</sup> 4 - 5<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 12 9 6 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 55 96 140 185 97 57 160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 61 96 138 170 98 60 154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 46 80 97 125 72 48 110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 49 75 89 107 68 49 98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 1.20 1.19 1.44 1.48 1.28 1.18 1.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 1.24 1.28 1.56 1.59 1.35 1.20 1.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Significance level (p) of two-way ANOVA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (A) Gender (G) A &#215; G</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.078 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.003 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.001 &lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Number of replications (pens of 5 birds) per gender and age period (week), respectively. <sup>2</sup>One male bird died within week 4. <sup>3</sup>Final body weight of male birds was determined 1 d earlier (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). <sup>4</sup>Starter period (d 1 - d 22). <sup>5</sup>Grower period (d 22 - d 36).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean daily nutrient and energy deposition in the whole body of growing meat-type broiler chickens per week, growth period and gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age (week)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >n<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dry matter (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude protein (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude lipids (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude ash (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Energy (kJ/d)<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2 3 4<sup>3</sup> 5<sup>4</sup> Mean 1 - 3<sup>5</sup> 4 - 5<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 12 9 6 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 11.7 22.1 30.8 35.4 20.4 12.7 32.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 14.3 21.7 29.4 36.9 21.5 13.7 33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 7.6 14.9 19.4 24.2 13.5 8.5 21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 9.0 13.4 17.5 20.7 12.8 8.5 19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 3.2 5.3 8.8 8.3 5.2 3.2 8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 4.1 6.6 9.7 14.0 7.2 4.1 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 0.9 1.9 2.6 2.8 1.7 1.0 2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 1.1 1.7 2.1 2.3 1.5 1.1 2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 307 566 810 904 528 327 853</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142 378 579 802 1046 589 366 924</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Significance level (p) of two-way ANOVA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (A) Gender (G) A &#215; G</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.139 0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 0.010</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Number of replications (pens of 5 birds) per gender and age period (week), respectively. <sup>2</sup>Calculated according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref14">14</xref>] , see 2.5. <sup>3</sup>One male bird died within week 4. <sup>4</sup>Final body weight of male birds was determined 1 d earlier (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). <sup>5</sup>Starter period (d 1 - d 22). <sup>6</sup>Grower period (d 22 - d 36).</p><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean whole and empty body weight of growing broiler chickens depending on age and gender<sup>1</sup></title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age (day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Whole body weight (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Empty body weight<sup>2</sup> (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Empty body weight<sup>2</sup> (% of body weight)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 8 15 22 29<sup>3</sup> 36<sup>4</sup> n Mean SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.0 170 437 959 1749 2488 89 966 899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.6 194 516 1045 1655 2438 90 982 854</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8 146 392 872 1632 2297 89 889 836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.0 169 475 964 1534 2279 90 911 799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.9 85.7 89.2 90.9 93.3 92.3 89 90.7 3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.4 87.2 92.2 92.2 92.8 93.4 90 91.7 2.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Significance level (p) of two-way ANOVA</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (A) Gender (G) A &#215; G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001 0.629 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001 0.349 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001 0.003 0.018</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p><sup>1</sup>15 replications per gender and age group, respectively. <sup>2</sup>Body weight following 24 h feed deprivation. <sup>3</sup>One male bird died within week 4. <sup>4</sup>Final body weight of male birds was determined at 35 d of age.</p><p>highly significant differences (p &lt; 0.001) across ages were detected, but no gender-specific differences (p &gt; 0.05) were observed. The empty BW, expressed as a percentage of the whole BW of the “full-fed” birds (free access to feed up to the time of feed withdrawal), varied between 86% and 93%. Following these observations, the mean age dependent live weight loss of birds after 24 h of feed deprivation varied relatively marginally between 7% (d 29) and 9% (d 15), with the exception of d 8. At this age, data for both female and male birds depicted a significantly higher BW loss between 13% and 14% as compared to other age groups. Furthermore, significant interactions for all variables were detected between age and gender.</p><p>Based on the data listed in the previous tables, the age and gender dependent content of crude nutrients and energy in the gained BW of broiler chicken was estimated. All values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) consistently increased with increasing age (p &lt; 0.001); although the corresponding data of male birds at 5 weeks did not exceeded those at 4 weeks. In addition, the individual CA concentrations in the BWG between weeks 3 and 5 underlay only a relatively low variation with slightly numerical advantages for male birds. Nevertheless, highly significant differences between individual values of both gender and the interaction of age x gender were observed (p &lt; 0.001), with the exception of the CP contents in the gain of male and female birds (p &gt; 0.05). In order to explain this observation based on already published data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] , the age and gender dependent partitioning of the yielded protein deposition (PD) in the feather and feather-free body fractions was calculated, additionally. The results summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> explicitly indicate significant gender-specific differences (p &lt; 0.001) between individual daily PD data in both of the body fractions. According to the considerably higher feather proportion in female birds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] , the mean daily PD in feathers of females exceeded the corresponding values of males. Conversely, the PD in the feather-free body of male birds was significantly higher as compared to females, especially at the end of the starter and during the entire grower period. In accordance with the previously mentioned accreted protein in the whole body of birds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), mean daily PD in both of the body fractions increased continuously with increasing age (p &lt; 0.001). Equally, the feather protein proportion in the BWG for both genders was consistently increased by a factor of 4 from week 1 to 5, with superior results for female birds (p &lt; 0.001). In the present study, the protein gain in the feather-free body also significantly increased with age, but only up to the age of 4 weeks and only by a factor of 1.2 with higher values for male birds.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the body weight gain (BWG) of fast growing meat-type broiler chickens depending on age period and gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age (week)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >n<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Dry matter (g/kg BWG)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude protein (g/kg BWG)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude lipids (g/kg BWG)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Crude ash (g/kg BWG)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Energy (MJ/kg BWG)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2 3 4<sup>2</sup> 5<sup>3</sup> Mean 1 - 3<sup>4</sup> 4 - 5<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 12 9 6 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224 257 276 317 283 284 263 299</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237 292 289 331 346 315 282 339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151 167 187 199 194 188 176 196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147 184 178 197 194 187 175 195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 70 66 91 66 73 66 78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 85 88 110 131 106 85 121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 21 23 27 23 23 22 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 23 23 24 22 22 22 23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75 6.72 7.07 8.33 7.23 7.35 6.78 7.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33 7.75 7.74 9.05 9.79 8.63 7.52 9.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Significance level (p) of two-way ANOVA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (A) Gender (G) A &#215; G</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.076 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Number of replications (pens of 5 birds) per gender and age period (week), respectively. <sup>2</sup>One male bird died within week 4. <sup>3</sup>Final body weight of male birds was determined 1 d earlier (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). <sup>4</sup>Starter period (d 1 - d 22). <sup>5</sup>Grower period (d 22 - d 36).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Daily protein deposition (PD) and protein gain as related to BWG in the feather and feather-free body fraction of growing broiler chickens depending on age period and gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age (week)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >n<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mean body weight (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PD in feathers (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >PD in feather-free body (g/d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Feather protein (g/kg BWG)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Feather-free body protein (g/kg BWG)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2 3 4<sup>2</sup> 5<sup>3</sup> Mean 1 - 3<sup>4</sup> 4 - 5<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 12 9 6 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111 337 787 1422 2107 1267 551 1773</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125 376 812 1386 2082 1242 558 1754</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 0.35 1.32 1.69 3.08 1.26 0.59 2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 0.74 1.20 2.31 3.42 1.57 0.70 2.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72 7.27 13.62 17.70 21.16 12.24 7.87 19.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11 8.26 12.15 15.19 17.25 11.19 7.84 16.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78 7.68 16.46 17.38 24.62 17.50 12.30 21.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.80 15.07 16.04 26.02 32.06 22.96 14.45 29.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.5 158.9 170.0 182.0 169.2 170.3 163.3 175.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.8 169.1 162.3 171.3 161.4 163.8 161.0 165.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="10"  >Significance level (p) of two-way ANOVA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Age (A) Gender (G) A &#215; G</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 0.640 &lt;0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;0.001 &lt;0.001 &lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Number of replications (pens of 5 birds) per gender and age period (week), respectively. <sup>2</sup>One male bird died within week 4. <sup>3</sup>Final body weight of male birds was determined 1 d earlier (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). <sup>4</sup>Starter period (d 1 - d 22). <sup>5</sup>Grower period (d 22 - d 36). BWG = Body weight gain.</p><p>To better illustrate, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> depicts the relative partitioning of the protein gain in feathers of male and female birds at different age periods. The graph clearly demonstrates the progressively increasing of PD data in the feather fraction during the entire growth period associated with higher values for females. Accordingly, during the age period of 4 to 5 weeks a proportion between 13 and more than 16 percent of the whole daily PD was accreted in the feather of female broiler chickens.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>During the entire experimental period, the mean daily FI of male birds was in line with the performance objectives of the Ross 308 broiler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref15">15</xref>] . However, female birds continuously yielded superior FI levels during weeks 2 to 5 as compared to these recommendations, but no significant gender specific effect (p &gt; 0.05) was obtained in the present study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Except for week 1, the observed mean daily BWG of both genders was in parts considerably higher than recommended [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref15">15</xref>] . The initially superior growth rate of females compared to male birds was likely the consequence of their slightly higher hatch weight and their higher feed intake during the first 2 weeks. The observed zoo-technical results had an advantageous impact on FCR data, especially during the last 3 weeks of the experimental period. As expected, the FCR of male birds was significantly better (p = 0.001) than that of females, and with increasing age inferior FCR results (p &lt; 0.001) were yielded for both genders.</p><p>As already reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] , it is well-known that the body composition of growing broiler chickens can be altered through the modulation of the dietary protein and energy supply as well as by animal-specific factors of influence. Similar effects could be expected for nutrient and energy deposition being dependent on the level of protein and energy intake. Lowering dietary CP in the feed has been shown to significantly increase body fat deposition in broiler chickens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref21">21</xref>] . Even when trials have included protein reduced diets with supplemented free AA, an observed significant increase in fat deposition could not be prevented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref22">22</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref27">27</xref>] . Similarly, the PD was not or only slightly influenced by these experimental conditions. In contrast, significantly higher body protein was accumulated with diets balanced according to the recommended AA requirement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref27">27</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref35">35</xref>] .</p><p>All these observations underline the importance of accurately formulating diets to ensure an ideal dietary AA balance according to the real requirement dependent on age and gender. By feeding such diets, the entire growth period of up to 5 weeks lead to male broiler chickens depositing on average between 11 and 13 g protein per day in the whole body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref36">36</xref>] . These results as well as the data (6 to 9 g PD per day) derived for the starter period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref33">33</xref>] are closely aligned to our estimated values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Further literature data relating to the nutrient and energy deposition in broiler chickens are not comparable because in such studies usually shorter BW ranges and different feeding strategies, including marginal and excessive nutrient supply, was examined. Therefore, in the majority of these investigations lower body protein and extremely variable body fat resp. body energy contents were obtained [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref40">40</xref>] as compared to our observed age and gender dependent deposition data. Predominantly, these results were attributed to the lower performance potential of earlier broiler genotypes or to the different genetic predisposition of growing chickens under study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref43">43</xref>] . However, in the literature it has been clearly documented that higher body fat deposition in birds was induced through higher energy supply (e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref44">44</xref>] . For example, as compared to our mean value for male birds and the entire growth period of 5 weeks, a markedly higher body energy deposition has been reported exceeding 600 kJ/d [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref35">35</xref>] or 700 kJ/d [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, the observations that female broilers accumulate significantly more body fat and lower body protein than their male counterparts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref42">42</xref>] , as indicated by our data (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), show that the gender of birds must be taken into account when nutrient deposition in the body of birds is being evaluated. Likewise, the observed influence that the deposition of protein, fat and energy significantly increased with increasing age confirmed results of other investigations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref46">46</xref>] . Regarding the body CA deposition, it can be stated that given the relatively limited data found in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref36">36</xref>] our observations are within range of expected results.</p><p>In order to estimate the nutrient and energy content in the gain of birds based on BW data observed in growth experiments, the difference between the individual empty BW as a reference for the nutrient composition and the whole BW prior to feed withdrawal must be estimated. In the present experiment a mean BW loss between 7% and 9% after 24 hours feed deprivation as related to the BW (live weight at free access to feed) immediate prior to feed withdrawal was calculated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In contrast, for birds both of both genders at the age of 8 d a range from 13% to 14% BW loss was recorded. This divergent result for these very young chickens is not described in the literature, but could be possibly attributed to the role of the yolk sac during the first week in a chicken’s life. Generally, the BW loss of birds is predominantly affected by the emptying of the digestive tract, and increases progressively with the time of feed deprivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref47">47</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref60">60</xref>] .</p><p>Consistent with our experimental approach, after a fasting period of 24 h without access to feed, the BW loss of broiler chickens at market age has been shown to vary between 6% and 10% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref61">61</xref>] . Our study reports values in reasonably good agreement with this range. However despite this narrow range, even slightly lower (below 6% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref53">53</xref>] ) and higher values (at about 13% after 16 h feed deprivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref53">53</xref>] ) of BW loss have been reported. The reasons of this extremely high variability are multifaceted. Alone, the definitions of BW loss do not remain consistent, and therefore comparable, throughout the literature. This may often have to do with variable conditions pre- and post-fasting or them not being described in full detail. Furthermore, the BW loss following feed deprivation depends considerably on holding conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref62">62</xref>] and the age of the birds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref60">60</xref>] . Additionally, it is also affected by the gender [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref63">63</xref>] , whereby higher weight loss for male chickens has been detected. The influence of the latter two factors was confirmed by our results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>); although other studies have reported no effect of sex on BW loss after feed deprivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref55">55</xref>] . Finally, different transit times of the feed through the gastrointestinal tract dependent on ingredient composition, dietary quality and the level of individual feed intake prior to feed deprivation must be taken into account.</p><p>The derived protein composition of the BWG of birds during the entire growth period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) is in good agreement with the summarized overview of GRRS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] and with more recent literature values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref64">64</xref>] , which indicate a range between 156 to 202 g CP/kg BWG from 1 to 5 weeks of age. Nie&#223; et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref26">26</xref>] even found values of up to 212 g protein per kg weight gain in male broiler chickens during the grower period from 21 to 42 d of age. In the German recommendations for poultry nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] no different protein content in the BWG between male and female birds was documented, and this recommendation can be considered advisable given our insignificant gender dependent data (p &gt; 0.05). In contrast, our calculated CL contents in the gained BW are considerably lower, especially for male broiler chickens, as compared with the reported data between 100 to 168 g CL/kg BWG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref64">64</xref>] . The literature values for female birds were superior to male birds, yet markedly higher (115 to 189 g CL/kg BWG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] ) than those listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>In the present study, the quantitative protein gain, both in feathers and feather-free body components, consistently increasing with age also conformed with previous literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref66">66</xref>] . However, Gous et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref42">42</xref>] and Bonato et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref67">67</xref>] have postulated that the rate of feather protein gain during growth is higher than that for body protein. As already discussed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref5">5</xref>] , the partitioning of protein in muscle tissues, organs and feathers is differentiates as age advances. Although the fresh feather mass represents only a small part of the empty BW (2% to 4% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref6">6</xref>] ), the contribution of feather protein deposition in proportion to the total body protein deposition ranged accordingly (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) from average 4.6% during week 1 (mean BW = 120 g) to an average of 14.6% during week 5 (mean BW = 2100 g). These data are in good agreement with values between 7.0% and 18.8% feather protein in the accreted whole body protein of 1 - 5 week old birds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref9">9</xref>] or a deposited proportion of 11% to 13% feather protein during the starter and grower period, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref32">32</xref>] . Therefore, it can be concluded from our results that the relative proportion of PD in the feather-free body (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) as well as in individual organs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref32">32</xref>] decreases with increasing age.</p><p>Despite comparable protein contents in the BWG for both genders, differences were found in the partitioning of the accreted amount of feather and feather-free body protein. Female birds deposited more protein absolutely in their feather fraction and had significantly more feather protein per unit BWG as compared to males. These results can be attributed to the relatively higher proportion of the feather fraction and the lower feather-free body fraction in female birds with increasing age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Beside this gender-specific difference, it must be taken into account that the nutrient supply preferentially impacts on feather growth, feather N content and feather protein gain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref68">68</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref69">69</xref>] resulting in a considerably higher “luxury deposition” of protein in the feather fraction of birds receiving the highest protein supply [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.89318-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The results of our present investigation indicated that the mean daily nutrient and energy deposition in the whole body of Ross 308 broiler chickens was significantly increased with increasing age from week 1 to week 5. Male birds achieved significantly higher body CP and CA deposition, especially during the last 3 weeks. In contrast, female birds contained consistently higher CL and energy deposition in the whole body during the weekly growth periods.</p><p>Throughout the study, the CP composition of the BWG was remained insignificant between both genders, but the protein partitioning in the feather and feather-free body fraction provided oppositional results. Male chickens yielded higher quantities of protein in the feather-free body and females had relatively more feather protein in the gained BW. Consequently, the feather protein percentage must be supposed as a variable parameter, especially during the rapid growth period of birds. These characteristics should be carefully considered in AA requirement studies because both protein fractions exhibit marked differences in the composition of individual AAs.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wecke, C. and Liebert, F. (2019) Age and Gender Dependent Deposition of Crude Nutrients and Energy in Fast Growing Meat-Type Chickens. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 9, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2019.91004</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.89318-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R. and Qureshi, M.A. (2003) Carcass Composition and Yield of 1957 Versus 2001 Broilers When Fed Representative 1957 And 2001 Broiler Diets. Poultry Science, 82, 1509-1518. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.10.1509</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schmidt, C.J., Persia, M.E., Feierstein, E., Kingham, B. and Saylor, W.W. (2009) Comparison of a Modern Broiler Line and a Heritage Line Unselected Since the 1950s. Poultry Science, 88, 2610-2619. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liebert, F. (2017) Further Progress Is Needed in Procedures for the Biological Evaluation of Dietary Protein Quality in Pig and Poultry Feeds. Archives Animal Breeding, 60, 259-270. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-60-259-2017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wecke, C., Khan, D.R., Sünder, A. and Liebert, F. (2018) Age and Gender Dependent Nutrient Composition of Feather and Feather-Free Body Fractions in Meat-Type Chickens. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8, 74-86.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.81006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wecke, C., Khan, D.R., Sünder, A. and Liebert, F. (2018) Age and Gender Dependent Amino Acid Concentrations in the Feather, Feather-Free and Whole Empty Body Protein of Fast Growing Meat-Type Chickens. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8, 223-238. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.83017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wecke, C., Khan, D.R., Sünder, A. and Liebert, F. (2017) Age and Gender Depending Growth of Feathers and Feather-Free Body in Modern Fast Growing Meat-Type Chickens. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 7, 376-392.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2017.74029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aviagen (2014) Ross Broiler Management Handbook. Aviagen Group, Huntsville. 
http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-Broiler-Handbook-2014i-EN.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NRC (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised Edition, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GRRS (German Recommendations for Requirement Standards) Gesellschaft für Ernahrungsphysiologie, Ausschuss für Bedarfsnormen (1999) Empfehlungen zur Energieund Nahrstoffversorgung der Legehennen und Masthühner (Broiler). DLG-Verlags-GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aviagen (2014) Ross 308 Broiler: Nutrition Specifications. Aviagen Group, Huntsville. 
http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-308-Broiler-Nutrition-Specs-2014r17-EN.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wecke, C. and Liebert, F. (2013) Improving the Reliability of Optimal In-Feed Amino Acid Ratios Based on Individual Amino Acid Efficiency Data from N Balance Studies in Growing Chicken. Animals, 3, 558-573.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3030558</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naumann, C. and Bassler, R. (1976-2004) Die chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln. [The Chemical Analysis of Feedstuffs.] Methodenbuch, Vol. III, VDLUFA-Verlag, Darmstadt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Commission of the European Communities (2009) Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 Laying Down the Methods of Sampling and Analysis for the Official Control of Feed. Official Journal of the European Union, L54/1-L54/130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Fuller, M.F., Ed. (2004) The Encyclopedia of Farm Animal Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993690.0000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aviagen (2014) Ross 308 Broiler: Performance Objectives. Aviagen Group, Huntsville. 
http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-308-Broiler-PO-2014-EN.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerum, J. and Kirchge&amp;beta;ner, M. (1978) Protein, Fat and Energy Deposition of Two Weeks Old Broilers with Varying Energy and Protein Supply. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 42, 22-28. (In German)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirchge&amp;beta;ner, M., Roth-Maier, D.A. and Gerum, J. (1978) Body Composition and Nutrient Deposition of 3-5 Week Old Broilers with Varying Energy and Protein Supply. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 42, 62-69. (In German)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jackson, S., Summers, J.D. and Leeson, S. (1981) Effect of Dietary Protein and Energy on Broiler Carcass Composition and Efficiency of Nutrient Utilization. Poultry Science, 61, 2224-2231. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0612224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosebrough, R.W. and Steele, N.C. (1985) Energy and Protein Relationships in the Broiler. 1. Effect of Protein Levels and Feeding Regimens on Growth, Body Composition, and In Vitro Lipogenesis of Boiler Chicks. Poultry Science, 64, 119-126. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0640119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geraert, P.A., Macleod, M.G., Larbier, M. and Leclercq, B. (1990) Nitrogen Metabolism in Genetically Fat and Lean Chickens. Poultry Science, 69, 1911-1921.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0691911</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aletor, V.A., Hamid, I.I., Nie&amp;beta;, E. and Pfeffer, E. (2000) Low-Protein Amino Acid-Supplemented Diets in Broiler Chickens: Effects on Performance, Whole-Body Composition and Efficiencies of Nutrient Utilization. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80, 547-554.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(200004)80:5&lt;547::AID-JSFA531&gt;3.0.CO;2-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Summers, J.D. and Leeson, S. (1985) Broiler Carcass Composition as Affected by Amino Acid Supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 65, 717-723.  
https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas85-084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fancher, B.I. and Jensen, L.S. (1989) Influence on Performance of Three to Six-Week-Old Broilers of Varying Dietary Protein Contents with Supplementation of Essential Amino Acid Requirements. Poultry Science, 68, 113-123.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0680113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deschepper, K. and De Groote, G. (1995) Effect of Dietary Protein, Essential and Non-Essential Amino Acids on the Performance and Carcase Composition of Male Broiler Chickens. British Poultry Science, 36, 229-245.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bregendahl, K., Sell, J.L. and Zimmerman, D.R. (2002) Effect of Low-Protein Diets on Growth Performance and Body Composition of Broiler Chicks. Poultry Science, 81, 1156-1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.8.1156</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nie&amp;beta;, E., Hamid, I.I. and Pfeffer, E. (2003) Effect of Non Essential Amino Acid Supply on the Deposition of Protein and Lipids in Broiler Chicks. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 67, 167-174.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fatufe, A.A. and Rodehutscord, M. (2005) Growth and Body Composition, and Marginal Efficiency of Methionine Utilization Are Affected by Nonessential Amino Acid Nitrogen Supplementation in Male Chicken. Poultry Science, 84, 1584-1592.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.10.1584</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velu, J.G., Scott, H.M. and Baker, D.H. (1972) Body Composition and Nutrient Utilization of Chicks Fed Amino Acid Diets Containing Graded Amounts of Either Isoleucine or Lysine. The Journal of Nutrition, 102, 741-748.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/102.6.741</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sibbald, I.R. and Wolynetz, M.S. (1986) Effects of Dietary Lysine and Feed Intake on Energy Utilization and Tissue Synthesis by Broiler Chicks. Poultry Science, 65, 98-105. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0650098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holsheimer, J.P. and Ruesink, E.W. (1993) Effect on Performance, Carcass Composition, Yield, and Financial Return of Dietary Energy and Lysine Levels in Starter and Finisher Diets Fed to Broilers. Poultry Science, 72, 806-815.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0720806</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, H.M. III and Baker, D.H. (1999) Maintenance Sulfur Amino Acid Requirements of Young Chicks and Efficiency of Their Use for Accretion of Whole-Body Sulfur Amino Acids and Protein. Poultry Science, 78, 1418-1423.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.10.1418</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eits, R.M., Kwakkel, R.P., Verstegen, M.W.A., Stoutjesdijk, P. and De Greef, K.H. (2002) Protein and Lipid Deposition Rates in Male Broiler Chickens: Separate Responses to Amino Acids and Protein-Free Energy. Poultry Science, 81, 472-480.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.472</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fatufe, A.A., Timmler, R. and Rodehutscord, M. (2004) Response to Lysine Intake in Composition of Body Weight Gain and Efficiency of Lysine Utilization of Growing Male Chickens from Two Genotypes. Poultry Science, 83, 1314-1324.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.8.1314</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neumann, C., Velten, S. and Liebert, F. (2018) The Graded Inclusion of Algae (Spirulina platensis) or Insect (Hermetiaillucens) Meal as a Soybean Meal Substitute in Meat Type Chicken Diets Impacts on Growth, Nutrient Deposition and Dietary Protein Quality Depending on the Extent of Amino Acid Supplementation. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8, 163-183. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.82012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velten, S., Neumann, C., Schafer, J. and Liebert, F. (2018) Effects of the Partial Replacement of Soybean Meal by Insect or Algae Meal in Chicken Diets with Graded Amino Acid Supply on Parameters of Gut Microbiology and Dietary Protein Quality. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 8, 259-279.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2018.83020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muhl, A. and Liebert, F. (2007) Growth, Nutrient Utilization and Threonine Requirement of Growing Chicken Fed Threonine Limiting Diets with Commercial Blends of Phytogenic Feed Additives. The Journal of Poultry Science, 44, 297-304.  
https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strohschneider, R. (1981) Feed Protein and Amino Acid Utilization in Growing Chickens Depending on Dietary Protein Content. PhD Thesis, Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen, 135.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahaner, A. and Leenstra, F. (1992) Effect of High Temperature on Growth and Efficiency of Male and Female Broilers from Lines Selected for High Weight Gain, Favourable Feed Conversion, and High or Low Fat Content. Poultry Science, 71, 1237-1250. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0711237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liebert</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Influence of Different Energy Supply on Nutrient and Energy Utilization of Broilers</article-title><source> Archiv für Geflügelkunde</source><volume> 59</volume>,<fpage> 269</fpage>-<lpage>273</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Webel, D.M., Johnson, R.W. and Baker, D.H. (1998) Liposaccharide-Induced Reductions in Body Weight Gain and Feed Intake Do Not Reduce the Efficiency of Arginine Utilization for Whole-Body Protein Accretion in the Chick. Poultry Science, 77, 1893-1898. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1893</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leclercq, B., Chagneau, A.M., Cochard, T. and Khoury, J. (1994) Comparative Responses of Genetically Lean and Fat Chickens to Lysine, Arginine and Non-Essential Amino Acid Supply. I. Growth and Body Composition. British Poultry Science, 35, 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669408417735</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gous, R.M., Moran Jr., E.T., Stilborn, H.R., Bradford, G.D. and Emmans, G.C. (1999) Evaluation of the Parameters Needed to Describe the Overall Growth, the Chemical Growth, and the Growth of Feathers and Breast Muscles of Broilers. Poultry Science, 78, 812-821. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.6.812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopez, G., de Lange, K. and Leeson, S. (2007) Partitioning of Retained Energy in Broilers and Birds with Intermediate Growth Rate. Poultry Science, 86, 2162-2171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boekholt, H.A., van der Grinten, P., Schreurs V.V.A.M., Los, M.J.N. and Leffering, C.P. (1994) Effect of Dietary Energy Restriction on Retention of Protein, Fat and Energy in Broiler Chickens. British Poultry Science, 35, 603-614.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669408417725</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1980) Production and Carcass Characteristics of the Broiler Chicken. Poultry Science, 59, 786-798. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590786</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xi, P.B., Yi, G.F., Lin, Y.C., Zheng, C.T., Jiang, Z.Y. Vazques-Anon, M., Song, G.L. and Knight, C.D. (2007) Effect of Methionine Source and Dietary Crude Protein Level on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Nutrient Retention in Chinese Color-Feathered Chicks. Asian-Austalasian Journal of Animal Science, 20, 962-970.  
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.962</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smidt, M.J., Formica, S.D. and Fritz, J.C. (1964) Effect of Fasting Prior to Slaughter on Yield of Broilers. Poultry Science, 43, 931-934.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0430931</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haseler, F. and Requart, E. (1968) Studies on the Influence of Different Fasting intervals on the Slaughtering Results of Chicken Broilers. Archiv für Geflügelzucht und Kleintierkunde, 17, 269-290. (In German)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wabeck, C.J. (1972) Feed and Water Withdrawal Time Relationship to Processing Yield and Potential Fecal Contamination of Broilers. Poultry Science, 51, 1119-1121. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0511119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veerkamp, C.H. (1978) The Influence of Fasting and Transport on Yields of Broilers. Poultry Science, 57, 634-638. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0570634</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Summers, J.D. and Leeson, S. (1979) Comparison of Feed Withdrawal Time and Passage of Gut Contents in Broiler Chickens Held in Crates or Litter Pens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 59, 63-66. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fletcher, D.L. and Rahn, A.P. (1982) The Effect of Environmentally Modified and Conventional Housing Types on Broiler Shrinkage. Poultry Science, 61, 67-74.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0610067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jensen, L.S., Cervantes, H.M. and Takahashi, K. (1984) Liver Lipid Content in Broilers as Affected by Time without Feed or Feed and Water. Poultry Science, 63, 2404-2407. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0632404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benibo, B.S. and Farr, A.J. (1985) The Effects of Feed and Water Withdrawal and Holding Shed Treatments on Broiler Yield Parameters. Poultry Science, 64, 920-924. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0640920</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veerkamp, C.H. (1986) Fasting and Yield of Broilers. Poultry Science, 65, 1299-1304. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0651299</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rasmussen, A.L. and Mast, M.G. (1989) Effect of Feed Withdrawal on Composition and Quality of Broiler Meat. Poultry Science, 68, 1109-1113.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0681109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lyon, C.E., Papa, C.M. and Wilson Jr., R.L. (1991) Effect of Feed Withdrawal on Yields, Muscle pH, and Texture of Broiler Breast Meat. Poultry Science, 70, 1020-1025. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0701020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papa, C.M. (1991) Lower Gut Contents of Broiler Chickens Withdrawn from Feed and Held in Cages. Poultry Science, 70, 375-380. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0700375</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buhr, R.J., Northcutt, J.K., Lyon, C.E. and Rowland, G.N. (1998) Influence of Time off Feed on Broiler Viscera Weight, Diameter, and Shear. Poultry Science, 77, 758-764. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.5.758</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Northcutt, J.K., Buhr, R.J., Berrang, M.E. and Fletcher, D.L. (2003) Effects of Replacement Finisher Feed and Length of Feed Withdrawal on Broiler Carcass Yield and Bacteria Recovery. Poultry Science, 82, 1820-1824.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.11.1820</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warriss, P.D., Wilkins, L.J., Brown, S.N., Phillips, A.J. and Allen, V. (2004) Defaecation and Weight of the Gastrointestinal Tract Contents after Feed and Water Withdrawal in Broilers. British Poultry Science, 45, 61-66.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166041668879</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, T.C., Schultz, C.D., Reece, F.N., Lott, B.D. and McNaughton, J.L. (1983) The Effect of Extended Holding Time, Temperature, and Dietary Energy on Yields of Broilers. Poultry Science, 62, 1566-1571. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moran Jr., E.T. and Bilgili, S.F. (1990) Processing Losses, Carcass Quality, and Meat Yields of Broiler Chickens Receiving Diets Marginally Deficient to Adequate in Lysine Prior to Marketing. Poultry Science, 69, 702-710.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690702</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conde-Aguilera, J.A., Cobo-Ortega, C., Tesseraud, S., Lessire, M., Mercier, Y. and van Milgen, J. (2013) Changes in Body Composition in Broilers by a Sulphur Amino Acid Deficiency during Growth. Poultry Science, 92, 1266-1275.  
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hurwitz, S., Sklan, D. and Bartov, I. (1978) New Formal Approaches to the Determination of Energy and Amino Acid Requirements of Chicks. Poultry Science, 57, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0570197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakomura, N.K., Silva, E.P., Dorigam, J.C.P., Gous, R.M. and St-Pierre, N. (2015) Modeling Amino Acid Requirements of Poultry. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 24, 267-282. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfv024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonato, M.A., Sakomura, N.K., Gous, R.M., Silva, E.P., Soares, L. and Peruzzi, N.J. (2016) Description of a Model to Optimise the Feeding of Amino Acids to Growing Pullets. British Poultry Science, 57, 123-133.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1127892</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wylie, L.M., Robertson, G.W. and Hocking, P.M. (2003) Effects of Dietary Protein Concentration and Specific Amino Acids on Body Weight, Body Composition and Feather Growth in Young Turkeys. British Poultry Science, 44, 75-87.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.89318-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Urdaneta-Rincon, M. and Leeson, S. (2004) Effect of Dietary Crude Protein and Lysine on Feather Growth in Chicks to Twenty-One Days of Age. Poultry Science, 83, 1713-1717. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.10.1713</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>